Dynamic regulation of mitotic ubiquitin ligase APC/C by coordinated Plx1 kinase and PP2A phosphatase action on a flexible Apc1 loop

The anaphase‐promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), a multi‐subunit ubiquitin ligase essential for cell cycle control, is regulated by reversible phosphorylation. APC/C phosphorylation by cyclin‐dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) promotes Cdc20 co‐activator loading in mitosis to form active APC/C‐Cdc20. However, detailed phospho‐regulation of APC/C dynamics through other kinases and phosphatases is still poorly understood. Here, we show that an interplay between polo‐like kinase (Plx1) and PP2A‐B56 phosphatase on a flexible loop domain of the subunit Apc1 (Apc1‐loop⁵⁰⁰) controls APC/C activity and mitotic progression. Plx1 directly binds to the Apc1‐loop⁵⁰⁰ in a phosphorylation‐dependent manner and promotes the formation of APC/C‐Cdc20 via Apc3 phosphorylation. Upon phosphorylation of loop residue T532, PP2A‐B56 is recruited to the Apc1‐loop⁵⁰⁰ and differentially promotes dissociation of Plx1 and PP2A‐B56 through dephosphorylation of Plx1‐binding sites. Stable Plx1 binding, which prevents PP2A‐B56 recruitment, prematurely activates the APC/C and delays APC/C dephosphorylation during mitotic exit. Furthermore, the phosphorylation status of the Apc1‐loop⁵⁰⁰ is controlled by distant Apc3‐loop phosphorylation. Our study suggests that phosphorylation‐dependent feedback regulation through flexible loop domains within a macromolecular complex coordinates the activity and dynamics of the APC/C during the cell cycle.     

Histone Chaperone NAP1 Mediates Sister Chromatid Resolution by Counteracting Protein Phosphatase 2A

Chromosome duplication and transmission into daughter cells requires the precisely orchestrated binding and release of cohesin. We found that the Drosophila histone chaperone NAP1 is required for cohesin release and sister chromatid resolution during mitosis. Genome-wide surveys revealed that NAP1 and cohesin co-localize at multiple genomic loci. Proteomic and biochemical analysis established that NAP1 associates with the full cohesin complex, but it also forms a separate complex with the cohesin subunit stromalin (SA). NAP1 binding to cohesin is cell-cycle regulated and increases during G2/M phase. This causes the dissociation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) from cohesin, increased phosphorylation of SA and cohesin removal in early mitosis. PP2A depletion led to a loss of centromeric cohesion. The distinct mitotic phenotypes caused by the loss of either PP2A or NAP1, were both rescued by their concomitant depletion. We conclude that the balanced antagonism between NAP1 and PP2A controls cohesin dissociation during mitosis.     

SGO1C is a non-functional isoform of Shugoshin and can disrupt sister chromatid cohesion by interacting with PP2A–B56

Shugoshin (SGO1) plays a pivotal role in sister chromatid cohesion during mitosis by protecting the centromeric cohesin from mitotic kinases and WAPL. Mammalian cells contain at least 6 alternatively spliced isoforms of SGO1. The relationship between the canonical SGO1A with shorter isoforms including SGO1C remains obscure. Here we show that SGO1C was unable to replace the loss of SGO1A. Instead, expression of SGO1C alone induced aberrant mitosis similar to depletion of SGO1A, promoting premature sister chromatid separation, activation of the spindle-assembly checkpoint, and mitotic arrest. In disagreement with previously published data, we found that SGO1C localized to kinetochores. However, the ability to induce aberrant mitosis did not correlate with its kinetochore localization. SGO1C mutants that abolished binding to kinetochores still triggered premature sister chromatid separation. We provide evidence that SGO1C-mediated mitotic arrest involved the sequestering of PP2A–B56 pool. Accordingly, SGO1C mutants that abolished binding to PP2A localized to kinetochores but did not induce aberrant mitosis. These studies imply that the expression of SGO1C should be tightly regulated to prevent dominant-negative effects on SGO1A and genome instability.     

The Aurora kinase Ipl1 maintains the centromeric localization of PP2A to protect cohesin during meiosis

Homologue segregation during the first meiotic division requires the proper spatial regulation of sister chromatid cohesion and its dissolution along chromosome arms, but its protection at centromeric regions. This protection requires the conserved MEI-S332/Sgo1 proteins that localize to centromeric regions and also recruit the PP2A phosphatase by binding its regulatory subunit, Rts1. Centromeric Rts1/PP2A then locally prevents cohesion dissolution possibly by dephosphorylating the protein complex cohesin. We show that Aurora B kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Ipl1) is also essential for the protection of meiotic centromeric cohesion. Coupled with a previous study in Drosophila melanogaster, this meiotic function of Aurora B kinase appears to be conserved among eukaryotes. Furthermore, we show that Sgo1 recruits Ipl1 to centromeric regions. In the absence of Ipl1, Rts1 can initially bind to centromeric regions but disappears from these regions after anaphase I onset. We suggest that centromeric Ipl1 ensures the continued centromeric presence of active Rts1/PP2A, which in turn locally protects cohesin and cohesion.     

Drosophila Dalmatian combines sororin and shugoshin roles in establishment and protection of cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion is crucial to ensure chromosome bi‐orientation and equal chromosome segregation. Cohesin removal via mitotic kinases and Wapl has to be prevented in pericentromeric regions in order to protect cohesion until metaphase, but the mechanisms of mitotic cohesion protection remain elusive in Drosophila. Here, we show that dalmatian (Dmt), an ortholog of the vertebrate cohesin‐associated protein sororin, is required for protection of mitotic cohesion in flies. Dmt is essential for cohesion establishment during interphase and is enriched on pericentromeric heterochromatin. Dmt is recruited through direct association with heterochromatin protein‐1 (HP1), and this interaction is required for cohesion. During mitosis, Dmt interdependently recruits protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) to pericentromeric regions, and PP2A binding is required for Dmt to protect cohesion. Intriguingly, Dmt is sufficient to protect cohesion upon heterologous expression in human cells. Our findings of a hybrid system, in which Dmt exerts both sororin‐like establishment functions and shugoshin‐like heterochromatin‐based protection roles, provide clues to the evolutionary modulation of eukaryotic cohesion regulation systems.     

Shugoshin regulates cohesion by driving relocalization of PP2A in Xenopus extracts

Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by cohesin. At the onset of mitosis, most cohesin dissociates from chromatin with the exception of a small population, present along chromosome arms and enriched at centromeres. A protein known as shugoshin (Sgo) is essential to maintain arm and centromeric cohesion until the onset of anaphase in transformed human cells, but not in other organisms like Drosophila or mouse. We have used Xenopus egg extracts to further explore this issue. Chromosomes assembled in extracts depleted of Sgo have little or no cohesin at centromeres and display centromeric cohesion defects. Unlike transformed human cells, however, arm cohesion is maintained in the absence of Sgo. Furthermore, Sgo depletion impairs the prophase dissociation of cohesin. This phenotype can be rescued by inhibition of PP2A. The protein phosphatase interacts with Sgo and accumulates at centromeres in mitosis in a Sgo-dependent manner. We propose that Sgo drives relocalization of PP2A from arms to centromeres and, in this way, coordinates release of arm cohesin with protection of centromeric cohesin in mitosis. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Human Bub1 defines the persistent cohesion site along the mitotic chromosome by affecting Shugoshin localization

Shugoshin (Sgo) proteins constitute a conserved protein family defined as centromeric protectors of Rec8-containing cohesin complexes in meiosis . In vertebrate mitosis, Scc1/Rad21-containing cohesin complexes are also protected at centromeres because arm cohesin, but not centromeric cohesin, is largely dissociated in pro- and prometaphase . The dissociation process is dependent on the activity of polo-like kinase (Plk1) and partly dependent on Aurora B . Recently, it has been demonstrated that vertebrate shugoshin is required for preserving centromeric cohesion during mitosis ; however, it was not addressed whether human shugoshin protects cohesin itself. Here, we show that the persistence of human Scc1 at centromeres in mitosis is indeed dependent on human Sgo1. In fission yeast, Sgo localization depends on Bub1, a conserved spindle checkpoint protein, which is enigmatically also required for chromosome congression during prometaphase in vertebrate cells. We demonstrate that human Sgo1 fails to localize at centromeres in Bub1-repressed cells, and centromeric cohesion is significantly loosened. Remarkably, in these cells, Sgo1 relocates to chromosomes all along their length and provokes ectopic protection from dissociation of Scc1 on chromosome arms. These results reveal a hitherto concealed role for human Bub1 in defining the persistent cohesion site of mitotic chromosomes.     

Sororin loads to the synaptonemal complex central region independently of meiotic cohesin complexes

The distribution and regulation of the cohesin complexes have been extensively studied during mitosis. However, the dynamics of their different regulators in vertebrate meiosis is largely unknown. In this work, we have analyzed the distribution of the regulatory factor Sororin during male mouse meiosis. Sororin is detected at the central region of the synaptonemal complex during prophase I, in contrast with the previously reported localization of other cohesin components in the lateral elements. This localization of Sororin depends on the transverse filaments protein SYCP1, but not on meiosis‐specific cohesin subunits REC8 and SMC1β. By late prophase I, Sororin accumulates at centromeres and remains there up to anaphase II. The phosphatase activity of PP2A seems to be required for this accumulation. We hypothesize that Sororin function at the central region of the synaptonemal complex could be independent on meiotic cohesin complexes. In addition, we suggest that Sororin participates in the regulation of centromeric cohesion during meiosis in collaboration with SGO2‐PP2A.     

A kinase‐dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting mitotic centromere cohesion

Sister‐chromatid cohesion mediated by the cohesin complex is fundamental for precise chromosome segregation in mitosis. Through binding the cohesin subunit Pds5, Wapl releases the bulk of cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase, whereas centromeric cohesin is protected from Wapl until anaphase onset. Strong centromere cohesion requires centromeric localization of the mitotic histone kinase Haspin, which is dependent on the interaction of its non‐catalytic N‐terminus with Pds5B. It remains unclear how Haspin fully blocks the Wapl–Pds5B interaction at centromeres. Here, we show that the C‐terminal kinase domain of Haspin (Haspin‐KD) binds and phosphorylates the YSR motif of Wapl (Wapl‐YSR), thereby directly inhibiting the YSR motif‐dependent interaction of Wapl with Pds5B. Cells expressing a Wapl‐binding‐deficient mutant of Haspin or treated with Haspin inhibitors show centromeric cohesion defects. Phospho‐mimetic mutation in Wapl‐YSR prevents Wapl from binding Pds5B and releasing cohesin. Forced targeting Haspin‐KD to centromeres partly bypasses the need for Haspin–Pds5B interaction in cohesion protection. Taken together, these results indicate a kinase‐dependent role for Haspin in antagonizing Wapl and protecting centromeric cohesion in mitosis.     

A potential role for human cohesin in mitotic spindle aster assembly

The cohesin multiprotein complex containing SMC1, SMC3, Scc3 (SA), and Scc1 (Rad21) is required for sister chromatid cohesion in eukaryotes. Although metazoan cohesin associates with chromosomes and was shown to function in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during interphase, the majority of cohesin was found to be off chromosomes and reside in the cytoplasm in metaphase. Despite its dissociation from chromosomes, however, microinjection of an antibody against human SMC1 led to disorganization of the metaphase plate and cell cycle arrest, indicating that human cohesin still plays an important role in metaphase. To address the mitotic function of human cohesin, the subcellular localization of cohesin components was reexamined in human cells. Interestingly, we found that cohesin localizes to the spindle poles during mitosis and interacts with NuMA, a spindle pole-associated factor required for mitotic spindle organization. The interaction with NuMA persists during interphase. Similar to NuMA, a significant amount of cohesin was found to associate with the nuclear matrix. Furthermore, in the absence of cohesin, mitotic spindle asters failed to form in vitro. Our results raise the intriguing possibility that in addition to its well demonstrated function in sister chromatid cohesion, cohesin may be involved in spindle assembly during mitosis.     

Shugoshin protects cohesin complexes at centromeres

The different regulation of sister chromatid cohesion at centromeres and along chromosome arms is obvious during meiosis, because centromeric cohesion, but not arm cohesion, persists throughout anaphase of the first division. A protein required to protect centromeric cohesin Rec8 from separase cleavage has been identified and named shugoshin (or Sgo1) after shugoshin ("guardian spirit" in Japanese). It has become apparent that shugoshin shows marginal homology with Drosophila Mei-S332 and several uncharacterized proteins in other eukaryotic organisms. Because Mei-S332 is a protein previously shown to be required for centromeric cohesion in meiosis, it is now established that shugoshin represents a conserved protein family defined as a centromeric protector of Rec8 cohesin complexes in meiosis. The regional difference of sister chromatid cohesion is also observed during mitosis in vertebrates; the cohesion is much more robust at the centromere at metaphase, where it antagonizes the pulling force of spindle microtubules that attach the kinetochores from opposite poles. The human shugoshin homologue (hSgo1) is required to protect the centromeric localization of the mitotic cohesin, Scc1, until metaphase. Bub1 plays a crucial role in the localization of shugoshin to centromeres in both fission yeast and humans.     

Regulation of mitotic chromosome cohesion by Haspin and Aurora B

In vertebrate mitosis, cohesion between sister chromatids is lost in two stages. In prophase and prometaphase, cohesin release from chromosome arms occurs under the control of Polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora B, while Shugoshin is thought to prevent removal of centromeric cohesin until anaphase. The regulatory enzymes that act to sustain centromeric cohesion are incompletely described, however. Haspin/Gsg2 is a histone H3 threonine-3 kinase required for normal mitosis. We report here that both H3 threonine-3 phosphorylation and cohesin are located at inner centromeres. Haspin depletion disrupts cohesin binding and sister chromatid association in mitosis, preventing normal chromosome alignment and activating the spindle assembly checkpoint, leading to arrest in a prometaphase-like state. Overexpression of Haspin hinders cohesin release and stabilizes arm cohesion. We conclude that Haspin is required to maintain centromeric cohesion during mitosis. We also suggest that Aurora B regulates cohesin removal through its effect on the localization of Shugoshin.     

Sororin actively maintains sister chromatid cohesion

Cohesion between sister chromatids is established during DNA replication but needs to be maintained to enable proper chromosome–spindle attachments in mitosis or meiosis. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin, but also depends on cohesin acetylation and sororin. Sororin contributes to cohesion by stabilizing cohesin on DNA. Sororin achieves this by inhibiting WAPL, which otherwise releases cohesin from DNA and destroys cohesion. Here we describe mouse models which enable the controlled depletion of sororin by gene deletion or auxin‐induced degradation. We show that sororin is essential for embryonic development, cohesion maintenance, and proper chromosome segregation. We further show that the acetyltransferases ESCO1 and ESCO2 are essential for stabilizing cohesin on chromatin, that their only function in this process is to acetylate cohesin''s SMC3 subunit, and that DNA replication is also required for stable cohesin–chromatin interactions. Unexpectedly, we find that sororin interacts dynamically with the cohesin complexes it stabilizes. This implies that sororin recruitment to cohesin does not depend on the DNA replication machinery or process itself, but on a property that cohesin acquires during cohesion establishment.     

Gain of PITRM1 peptidase in cortical neurons affords protection of mitochondrial and synaptic function in an advanced age mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

Mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the early pathological features of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Accumulation of cerebral and mitochondrial Aβ links to mitochondrial and synaptic toxicity. We have previously demonstrated the mechanism by which presequence peptidase (PITRM1)‐mediated clearance of mitochondrial Aβ contributes to mitochondrial and cerebral amyloid pathology and mitochondrial and synaptic stress in adult transgenic AD mice overexpressing Aβ up to 12 months old. Here, we investigate the effect of PITRM1 in an advanced age AD mouse model (up to 19–24 months) to address the fundamental unexplored question of whether restoration/gain of PITRM1 function protects against mitochondrial and synaptic dysfunction associated with Aβ accumulation and whether this protection is maintained even at later ages featuring profound amyloid pathology and synaptic failure. Using newly developed aged PITRM1/Aβ‐producing AD mice, we first uncovered reduction in PITRM1 expression in AD‐affected cortex of AD mice at 19–24 months of age. Increasing neuronal PITRM1 activity/expression re‐established mitochondrial respiration, suppressed reactive oxygen species, improved synaptic function, and reduced loss of synapses even at advanced ages (up to 19–24 months). Notably, loss of PITRM1 proteolytic activity resulted in Aβ accumulation and failure to rescue mitochondrial and synaptic function, suggesting that PITRM1 activity is required for the degradation and clearance of mitochondrial Aβ and Aβ deposition. These data indicate that augmenting PITRM1 function results in persistent life‐long protection against Aβ toxicity in an AD mouse model. Therefore, augmenting PITRM1 function may enhance Aβ clearance in mitochondria, thereby maintaining mitochondrial integrity and ultimately slowing the progression of AD.     

PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation

Loss of sister-chromatid cohesion triggers chromosome segregation in mitosis and occurs through two mechanisms in vertebrate cells: (1) phosphorylation and removal of cohesin from chromosome arms by mitotic kinases, including Plk1, during prophase, and (2) cleavage of centromeric cohesin by separase at the metaphase-anaphase transition. Bub1 and the MEI-S332/Shugoshin (Sgo1) family of proteins protect centromeric cohesin from mitotic kinases during prophase. We show that human Sgo1 binds to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). PP2A localizes to centromeres in a Bub1-dependent manner. The Sgo1-PP2A interaction is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation in human cells. Depletion of Plk1 by RNA interference (RNAi) restores centromeric localization of Sgo1 and prevents chromosome missegregation in cells depleted of PP2A_Aalpha. Our findings suggest that Bub1 targets PP2A to centromeres, which in turn maintains Sgo1 at centromeres by counteracting Plk1-mediated chromosome removal of Sgo1.     

Drosophila cohesins DSA1 and Drad21 persist and colocalize along the centromeric heterochromatin during mitosis

Sister chromatid cohesion in eukaryotes is maintained mainly by a conserved multiprotein complex termed cohesin. Drad21 and DSA1 are the Drosophila homologues of the yeast Scc1 and Scc3 cohesin subunits, respectively. We recently identified a Drosophila mitotic cohesin complex composed of Drad21/DSA1/DSMC1/DSMC3. Here we study the contribution of this complex to sister chromatid cohesion using immunofluorescence microscopy to analyze cell cycle chromosomal localization of DSA1 and Drad21 in S2 cells. We observed that DSA1 and Drad21 colocalize during all cell cycle stages in cultured cells. Both proteins remain in the centromere until metaphase, colocalizing at the centromere pairing domain that extends along the entire heterochromatin; the centromeric cohesion protein MEI-S332 is nonetheless reported in a distinct centromere domain. These results provide strong evidence that DSA1 and Drad21 are partners in a cohesin complex involved in the maintenance of sister chromatid arm and centromeric cohesion during mitosis in Drosophila.