A role for the distal carboxyl tails in generating the novel pharmacology and G protein activation profile of mu and delta opioid receptor hetero-oligomers

Opioid receptor pharmacology in vivo has predicted a greater number of receptor subtypes than explained by the profiles of the three cloned opioid receptors, and the functional dependence of the receptors on each other shown in gene-deleted animal models remains unexplained. One mechanism for such findings is the generation of novel signaling complexes by receptor hetero-oligomerization, which we previously showed results in significantly different pharmacology for mu and delta receptor hetero-oligomers compared with the individual receptors. In the present study, we show that deltorphin-II is a fully functional agonist of the mu-delta heteromer, which induced desensitization and inhibited adenylyl cyclase through a pertussis toxin-insensitive G protein. Activation of the mu-delta receptor heteromer resulted in preferential activation of Galpha(z), illustrated by incorporation of GTPgamma(35)S, whereas activation of the individually expressed mu and delta receptors preferentially activated Galpha(i). The unique pharmacology of the mu-delta heteromer was dependent on the reciprocal involvement of the distal carboxyl tails of both receptors, so that truncation of the distal mu receptor carboxyl tail modified the delta-selective ligand-binding pocket, and truncation of the delta receptor distal carboxyl tail modified the mu-selective binding pocket. The distal carboxyl tails of both receptors also had a significant role in receptor interaction, as evidenced by the reduced ability to co-immunoprecipitate when the carboxyl tails were truncated. The interaction between mu and delta receptors occurred constitutively when the receptors were co-expressed, but did not occur when receptor expression was temporally separated, indicating that the hetero-oligomers were generated by a co-translational mechanism.     

Evidence for a mu-delta opioid receptor complex in CHO cells co-expressing mu and delta opioid peptide receptors

Based on non-competitive binding interactions we suggested that mu and delta receptors associate as a mu/delta receptor complex in rat brain. We hypothesized that the same non-competitive binding interactions observed in rat brain will be seen in CHO cells that co-express mu and delta receptors, but not in cells that express just mu or delta receptors. We used CHO cells expressing the cloned human mu receptor, cloned human delta receptor, or cloned mouse delta/human mu ("dimer cell"). Cell membranes were prepared from intact cells pretreated with 100nM SUPERFIT. [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding assays followed published procedures. SUPERFIT, a delta-selective irreversible ligand, decreased [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to delta receptors by approximately 75% and to mu receptors by approximately 50% in dimer cells. SUPERFIT treatment did not decrease [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to mu cells. The IC(50) values observed in SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells were: [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin (1820nM) and morphine (171nM). Saturation binding experiments with SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells showed that [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin (5000nM) was a competitive inhibitor. In contrast, morphine (1000nM) lowered the B(max) from 1944fmol/mg to 1276fmol/mg protein (35% decrease). Both [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin and morphine competitively inhibited [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to SUPERFIT-treated mu cells. The results indicate that the mu-delta opioid receptor complex defined on the basis of non-competitive binding interactions in rat brain over 20 years ago likely occurs as a consequence of the formation of mu-delta heterodimers. SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells may provide a useful model to study the properties of mu-delta heterodimers.     

Internalization and recycling of human mu opioid receptors expressed in Sf9 insect cells

Internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the mu-opioid receptor, largely depend on agonist stimulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of some GPCRs has been shown to mediate receptor desensitization, resensitization, and down-regulation. In this study, we investigated whether different mu opioid agonists displayed different effects in receptor internalization and recycling, the potential mechanisms involved in ohmefentanyl-induced internalization process. In transfected Sf9 insect cells expressing 6His-tagged wild type mu opioid receptor, exposure to 100 nM ohmefentanyl caused a maximum internalization of the receptor at 30 min and receptors seemed to reappear at the cell membrane after 60 min as determined by radioligand binding assay. Ohmefentanyl-induced human mu opioid receptor internalization was concentration-dependent, with about 40% of the receptors internalized following a 30-min exposure to 1 microM ohmefentanyl. 10 microM morphine and 1 microM DAMGO could also induce about 40% internalization. The antagonist naloxone and pretreatment with pertussis toxin both blocked ohmefentanyl-induced internalization without affecting internalization themselves. Incubation with sucrose 0.45 M significantly inhibited ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of the mu receptor. The removal of agonists ohmefentanyl and morphine resulted in the receptors gradually returning to the cell surface over a 60 min period, while the removal of agonist DAMGO only partly resulted in the receptor recycling. The results of this study suggest that ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of human mu opioid receptor in Sf9 insect cells occurs via Gi/o protein-dependent process that likely involves clathrin-coated pits. In addition, the recycling process displays the differential modes of action of different agonists.     

In Vivo Delta Opioid Receptor Internalization Controls Behavioral Effects of Agonists

Background

GPCRs regulate a remarkable diversity of biological functions, and are thus often targeted for drug therapies. Stimulation of a GPCR by an extracellular ligand triggers receptor signaling via G proteins, and this process is highly regulated. Receptor activation is typically accompanied by desensitization of receptor signaling, a complex feedback regulatory process of which receptor internalization is postulated as a key event. The in vivo significance of GPCR internalization is poorly understood. In fact, the majority of studies have been performed in transfected cell systems, which do not adequately model physiological environments and the complexity of integrated responses observed in the whole animal.

Methods and Findings

In this study, we used knock-in mice expressing functional fluorescent delta opioid receptors (DOR-eGFP) in place of the native receptor to correlate receptor localization in neurons with behavioral responses. We analyzed the pain-relieving effects of two delta receptor agonists with similar signaling potencies and efficacies, but distinct internalizing properties. An initial treatment with the high (SNC80) or low (AR-M100390) internalizing agonist equally reduced CFA-induced inflammatory pain. However, subsequent drug treatment produced highly distinct responses. Animals initially treated with SNC80 showed no analgesic response to a second dose of either delta receptor agonist. Concomitant receptor internalization and G-protein uncoupling were observed throughout the nervous system. This loss of function was temporary, since full DOR-eGFP receptor responses were restored 24 hours after SNC80 administration. In contrast, treatment with AR-M100390 resulted in retained analgesic response to a subsequent agonist injection, and ex vivo analysis showed that DOR-eGFP receptor remained G protein-coupled on the cell surface. Finally SNC80 but not AR-M100390 produced DOR-eGFP phosphorylation, suggesting that the two agonists produce distinct active receptor conformations in vivo which likely lead to differential receptor trafficking.

Conclusions

Together our data show that delta agonists retain full analgesic efficacy when receptors remain on the cell surface. In contrast, delta agonist-induced analgesia is abolished following receptor internalization, and complete behavioral desensitization is observed. Overall these results establish that, in the context of pain control, receptor localization fully controls receptor function in vivo. This finding has both fundamental and therapeutic implications for slow-recycling GPCRs.     

Internalization dissociates β2-adrenergic receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) self-associate as dimers or higher-order oligomers in living cells. The stability of associated GPCRs has not been extensively studied, but it is generally thought that these receptors move between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments as intact dimers or oligomers. Here we show that β(2)-adrenergic receptors (β(2)ARs) that self-associate at the plasma membrane can dissociate during agonist-induced internalization. We use bioluminescence-resonance energy transfer (BRET) to monitor movement of β(2)ARs between subcellular compartments. BRET between β(2)ARs and plasma membrane markers decreases in response to agonist activation, while at the same time BRET between β(2)ARs and endosome markers increases. Energy transfer between β(2)ARs is decreased in a similar manner if either the donor- or acceptor-labeled receptor is mutated to impair agonist binding and internalization. These changes take place over the course of 30 minutes, persist after agonist is removed, and are sensitive to several inhibitors of arrestin- and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The magnitude of the decrease in BRET between donor- and acceptor-labeled β(2)ARs suggests that at least half of the receptors that contribute to the BRET signal are physically segregated by internalization. These results are consistent with the possibility that β(2)ARs associate transiently with each other in the plasma membrane, or that β(2)AR dimers or oligomers are actively disrupted during internalization.     

Agonist-dependent dissociation of oligomeric complexes of G protein-coupled cholecystokinin receptors demonstrated in living cells using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer.

Dimerization of some G protein-coupled receptors has recently been demonstrated, but how widespread this phenomenon might be and its functional implications are not yet clear. We have utilized biophysical and biochemical techniques to evaluate whether the type A cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor can form oligomeric complexes in the plasma membrane and the impact of ligand binding and signaling on such complexes. We investigated the possibility of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) between receptor constructs that included carboxyl-terminal tags of Renilla luciferase or yellow fluorescent protein. Indeed, co-expression of these constructs in COS cells resulted in the constitutive presence of a significant BRET signal above that in a series of controls, with this signal reduced by co-expression of competing non-tagged CCK receptors. The presence of an oligomeric complex of CCK receptor molecules was confirmed in co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Occupation of CCK receptors with agonist ligands (CCK or gastrin-4) resulted in the rapid reduction in BRET signal in contrast to the enhancement of such a signal reported after agonist occupation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. These effects on CCK receptor oligomerization were concentration-dependent, correlating with the potencies of the agonists. A smaller effect was observed for a partial agonist, and no effect was observed for antagonist occupation of this receptor. Agonist-induced reduction in BRET signal was also observed for pairs of CCK receptors with a donor-acceptor pair situated in other positions within the receptor. Manipulation of the phosphorylation state of CCK receptor using protein kinase C activation with phorbol ester or inhibition with staurosporine had no effect on the basal level or agonist effect on CCK receptor oligomerization. This provides the first evidence for CCK receptor oligomerization in living cells, with insights that the active conformation of this receptor dissociates these complexes in a phosphorylation-independent manner.     

Caveolin-1 and -2 in the Exocytic Pathway of MDCK Cells

Abstract. We have studied the biosynthesis and transport of the endogenous caveolins in MDCK cells. We show that in addition to homooligomers of caveolin-1, heterooligomeric complexes of caveolin-1 and -2 are formed in the ER. The oligomers become larger, increasingly detergent insoluble, and phosphorylated on caveolin-2 during transport to the cell surface. In the TGN caveolin-1/-2 heterooligomers are sorted into basolateral vesicles, whereas larger caveolin-1 homooligomers are targeted to the apical side. Caveolin-1 is present on both the apical and basolateral plasma membrane, whereas caveolin-2 is enriched on the basolateral surface where caveolae are present. This suggests that caveolin-1 and -2 heterooligomers are involved in caveolar biogenesis in the basolateral plasma membrane. Anti–caveolin-1 antibodies inhibit the apical delivery of influenza virus hemagglutinin without affecting basolateral transport of vesicular stomatitis virus G protein. Thus, we suggest that caveolin-1 homooligomers play a role in apical transport.     

Recycling and resensitization of delta opioid receptors

Exposure to opioids results in the activation of opioid receptors; this is followed by receptor endocytosis. Previously, we showed that delta opioid receptors undergo rapid agonist-mediated internalization and that mutations in the C-tail result in a substantial loss of agonist-mediated internalization. In this study, we investigated the fate of receptors following rapid internalization. We found that the majority of the wild type receptors recycled back to the surface after acute agonist treatment. The kinetics of internalization and recycling of the receptor were virtually identical to the kinetics of internalization and recycling of the radiolabeled agonist. In contrast, the kinetics of internalization and recycling of a C-tail mutant receptor were substantially altered, suggesting an involvement of the C-tail in the recycling process. It is possible that in addition to agonist-mediated internalization, opioid receptors undergo constitutive, agonist-independent internalization. We directly examined this possibility using an antibody-prebinding assay. The wild type delta opioid receptors exhibited agonist-independent internalization via the clathrin-coated pit pathway. We also examined the role of receptor internalization and recycling in the modulation of its function by quantitating the level of opioid-stimulated phosphorylation of MAP kinase (MAPK) under conditions of receptor internalization and recycling. We found that agonist treatment caused a rapid increase in the level of phosphorylated MAPK that was rapidly desensitized. The removal of the agonist, which results in receptor recycling, led to the resensitization of the receptor, as evidenced by the agonist's ability to reinduce MAPK phosphorylation. Mutant receptors that underwent rapid recycling exhibited enhanced resensitization, suggesting a role for receptor recycling in the resensitization process. Taken together, these results indicate that agonist-mediated internalization and recycling modulate opioid receptor function and that the receptor C-tail plays an important role in both processes.     

Proteasome involvement in agonist-induced down-regulation of mu and delta opioid receptors

This study investigated the mechanism of agonist-induced opioid receptor down-regulation. Incubation of HEK 293 cells expressing FLAG-tagged delta and mu receptors with agonists caused a time-dependent decrease in opioid receptor levels assayed by immunoblotting. Pulse-chase experiments using [(35)S]methionine metabolic labeling indicated that the turnover rate of delta receptors was accelerated 5-fold following agonist stimulation. Inactivation of functional G(i) and G(o) proteins by pertussis toxin-attenuated down-regulation of the mu opioid receptor, while down-regulation of the delta opioid receptor was unaffected. Pretreatment of cells with inhibitors of lysosomal proteases, calpain, and caspases had little effect on mu and delta opioid receptor down-regulation. In marked contrast, pretreatment with proteasome inhibitors attenuated agonist-induced mu and delta receptor down-regulation. In addition, incubation of cells with proteasome inhibitors in the absence of agonists increased steady-state mu and delta opioid receptor levels. Immunoprecipitation of mu and delta opioid receptors followed by immunoblotting with ubiquitin antibodies suggested that preincubation with proteasome inhibitors promoted accumulation of polyubiquitinated receptors. These data provide evidence that the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway plays a role in agonist-induced down-regulation and basal turnover of opioid receptors.     

In-vitro investigation of oxazol and urea analogues of morphinan at opioid receptors

A series of 2-amino-oxazole (7 and 8) analogs and 2-one-oxazole analogs (9 and 10) were synthesized from cyclorphan (1) or butorphan (2) and evaluated in-vitro by their binding affinity at mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors and compared with their 2-aminothiozole analogs 5 and 6. Ligands 7-10 showed decreased affinities at kappa and mu receptors. Urea analogs (11-14) were also prepared from 2-aminocyclorphan (3) or 2-aminobutorphan (4) and evaluated in-vitro by their binding affinity at mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. The urea derived opioids retained their affinities at mu receptors while showing increased affinities at delta receptors and decreased affinities at kappa receptors. Functional activities of these compounds were measured in the [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay, illustrating that all of these ligands were kappa agonists. At the mu receptor, compounds 11 and 12 were mu agonist/antagonists.     

Prejunctional effects of opioids in the perfused mesentery of the rat and rabbit: interactions with alpha 2-adrenoceptors.

Prejunctional effects of opioids were examined in the perfused mesentery of two species: the rat and rabbit. Use of agonists selective for subtypes of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors produced no effect on contractile responses to adrenergic nerve stimulation in the rat perfused mesentery, except for small effects of the kappa agonist EKC, which may be non specific. In contrast, mu, delta and kappa receptors appear to be present in the rabbit. The mu selective agonist, DAMGO, kappa agonist, ethylketocyclazocine, and delta agonists, DPDPE and [Leu5]-enkephalin, all produced significant inhibition of contractile responses to transmural nerve stimulation. The inhibitory effect was greatest for ethylketocyclazocine. To test the possibility that prejunctional activation of alpha 2 adrenoceptors with endogenous norepinephrine might decrease the activity of prejunctional opioid receptors in the rabbit, inhibitory effects of delta and kappa selective agonists were tested in the presence of 10(-7) M yohimbine. Inhibitory responses of the kappa selective agonist ethylketocyclazocine were enhanced, while that of delta selective agonists [Leu5]-enkephalin and DPDPE remained unchanged when yohimbine was present. Thus, the effects of opioids vary and depend on the tissue and receptor subtypes they act upon. Furthermore, the enhanced inhibitory effect of opioid receptor activation in the presence of yohimbine is not found for all opioid receptors.     

Orexin-1 receptor-cannabinoid CB1 receptor heterodimerization results in both ligand-dependent and -independent coordinated alterations of receptor localization and function

Following inducible expression in HEK293 cells, the human orexin-1 receptor was targeted to the cell surface but became internalized following exposure to the peptide agonist orexin A. By contrast, constitutive expression of the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor resulted in a predominantly punctate, intracellular distribution pattern consistent with spontaneous, agonist-independent internalization. Expression of the orexin-1 receptor in the presence of the CB1 receptor resulted in both receptors displaying the spontaneous internalization phenotype. Single cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer imaging indicated the two receptors were present as heterodimers/oligomers in intracellular vesicles. Addition of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR-141716A to cells expressing only the CB1 receptor resulted in re-localization of the receptor to the cell surface. Although SR-141716A has no significant affinity for the orexin-1 receptor, in cells co-expressing the CB1 receptor, the orexin-1 receptor was also re-localized to the cell surface by treatment with SR-141716A. Treatment of cells co-expressing the orexin-1 and CB1 receptors with the orexin-1 receptor antagonist SB-674042 also resulted in re-localization of both receptors to the cell surface. Treatment with SR-141716A resulted in decreased potency of orexin A to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1/2 only in cells co-expressing the two receptors. Treatment with SB-674042 also reduced the potency of a CB1 receptor agonist to phosphorylate ERK1/2 only when the two receptors were co-expressed. These studies introduce an entirely novel pharmacological paradigm, whereby ligands modulate the function of receptors for which they have no significant inherent affinity by acting as regulators of receptor heterodimers.     

Transmembrane segment peptides can disrupt cholecystokinin receptor oligomerization without affecting receptor function

Oligomerization of the G protein-coupled cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor has been demonstrated, but its molecular basis and functional importance are not clear. We now examine contributions of transmembrane (TM) segments to oligomerization of this receptor using a peptide competitive inhibition strategy. Oligomerization of CCK receptors tagged at the carboxyl terminus with Renilla luciferase or yellow fluorescent protein was quantified using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Synthetic peptides representing TM I, II, V, VI, and VII of the CCK receptor were utilized as competitors. Of these, only TM VI and VII peptides disrupted receptor BRET. Control studies established that the beta2-adrenergic receptor TM VI peptide that disrupts oligomerization of that receptor had no effect on CCK receptor BRET. Notably, disruption of CCK receptor oligomerization had no effect on agonist binding, biological activity, or receptor internalization. To gain insight into the face of TM VI contributing to oligomerization, we utilized analogous peptides with alanines in positions 315, 319, and 323 (interhelical face) or 317, 321, and 325 (external lipid-exposed face). The Ala317,321,325 peptide eliminated the disruptive effect on CCK receptor BRET, whereas the other mutant peptide behaved like wild-type TM VI. This suggests that the lipid-exposed face of the CCK receptor TM VI most contributes to oligomerization and supports external contact dimerization of helical bundles, rather than domain-swapped dimerization. Fluorescent CCK receptor mutants with residues 317, 321, and 325 replaced with alanines were also prepared and failed to yield significant resonance transfer signals using either BRET or a morphological FRET assay, further supporting this interpretation.     

A membrane network of receptors and enzymes for adenine nucleotides and nucleosides

Most cells express more than one receptor plus degrading enzymes for adenine nucleotides or nucleosides, and cellular responses to purines are rarely compatible with the actions of single receptors. Therefore, these receptors are viewed as components of a combinatorial receptor web rather than self-dependent entities, but it remained unclear to what extent they can associate with each other to form signalling units. P2Y(1), P2Y(2), P2Y(12), P2Y(13), P2X(2), A(1), A(2A) receptors and NTPDase1 and -2 were expressed as fluorescent fusion proteins which were targeted to membranes and signalled like the unlabelled counterparts. When tested by FRET microscopy, all the G protein-coupled receptors proved able to form heterooligomers with each other, and P2Y(1), P2Y(12), P2Y(13), A(1), A(2A), and P2X(2) receptors also formed homooligomers. P2Y receptors did not associate with P2X, but G protein-coupled receptors formed heterooligomers with NTPDase1, but not NTPDase2. The specificity of prototypic interactions (P2Y(1)/P2Y(1), A(2A)/P2Y(1), A(2A)/P2Y(12)) was corroborated by FRET competition or co-immunoprecipitation. These results demonstrate that G protein-coupled purine receptors associate with each other and with NTPDase1 in a highly promiscuous manner. Thus, purinergic signalling is not only determined by the expression of receptors and enzymes but also by their direct interaction within a previously unrecognized multifarious membrane network.     

Morphine tolerance in mice changes response of heroin from mu to delta opioid receptors

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.     

Modifications of the cyclic mu receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et): effects on opioid receptor binding and activation.

The previously described cyclic mu opioid receptor-selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et) (JOM-6) was modified at residues 1 and 3 by substitution with various natural and synthetic amino acids, and/or by alteration of the cyclic system. Effects on mu and delta opioid receptor binding affinities, and on potencies and efficacies as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, were evaluated. Affinities at mu and delta receptors were not influenced dramatically by substitution of Tyr1 with conformationally restricted phenolic amino acids. In the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, all of the peptides tested exhibited a maximal response comparable with that of fentanyl at the mu opioid receptor, and all showed high potency, in the range 0.4-9nM. However, potency changes did not always correlate with affinity, suggesting that the conformation required for binding and the conformation required for activation of the opioid receptors are different. At the delta opioid receptor, none of the peptides were able to produce a response equivalent to that of the full delta agonist BW 373,U86 and only one had an EC50 value of less than 100nM. Lastly, we have identified a peptide, D-Hat-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et), with high potency and > 1,000-fold functional selectivity for the mu over delta opioid receptor as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay.     

Phosphorylation of the delta-opioid receptor regulates its beta-arrestins selectivity and subsequent receptor internalization and adenylyl cyclase desensitization

In the current study, we investigated the role of receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestins in delta-opioid receptor (DOR) signaling and trafficking by using a DOR mutant in which all Ser/Thr residues in the C terminus were mutated to Ala (DTS). We demonstrated that the DOR agonist D-[Pen(2),Pen(5)]enkephalin could induce receptor internalization and adenylyl cyclase (AC) desensitization of DTS, but with comparatively slower kinetics than those observed with wild type DOR. Blockade of the internalization of DTS by the dominant-negative mutant dynamin, dynamin K44E, did not affect AC desensitization. However, depletion of beta-arrestins almost totally blocked both internalization and AC desensitization of DTS. A BRET assay suggested that DOR phosphorylation promotes receptor selectivity for beta-arrestin 2 over beta-arrestin 1. Furthermore, in mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells lacking either beta-arrestin 1 (beta arr1(-/-)) or beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr2(-/-)), agonist-induced DTS desensitization and internalization were similar to that observed in wild type MEFs. In contrast, although DOR internalization decreased in both beta arr1(-/-) MEFs and beta arr2(-/-) MEFs, DPDPE-induced DOR desensitization was significantly reduced in beta arr2(-/-) MEFs, but not in beta arr1(-/-) MEFs. Additionally, the BRET assay suggested that depletion of phosphorylation did not influence the stability of the receptor-beta-arrestin complex. Consistent with this observation, DTS did not recycle after internalization, which is like wild type DOR. Taken together, these results indicate that receptor phosphorylation confers DOR selectivity for beta-arrestin 2 without affecting the stability of the receptor-beta-arrestin complex and the fate of the internalized receptor.     

Constraints on GPCR Heterodimerization Revealed by the Type-4 Induced-Association BRET Assay

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest and most pharmacologically important family of cell-surface receptors encoded by the human genome. In many instances, the distinct signaling behavior of certain GPCRs has been explained in terms of the formation of heteromers with, for example, distinct signaling properties and allosteric cross-regulation. Confirmation of this has, however, been limited by the paucity of reliable methods for probing heteromeric GPCR interactions in situ. The most widely used assays for GPCR stoichiometry, based on resonance energy transfer, are unsuited to reporting heteromeric interactions. Here, we describe a targeted bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay, called type-4 BRET, which detects both homo- and heteromeric interactions using induced multimerization of protomers within such complexes, at constant expression. Using type-4 BRET assays, we investigate heterodimerization among known GPCR homodimers: the CXC chemokine receptor 4 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. We observe that CXC chemokine receptor 4 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors can form heterodimers with GPCRs from their immediate subfamilies but not with more distantly related receptors. We also show that heterodimerization appears to disrupt homodimeric interactions, suggesting the sharing of interfaces. Broadly, these observations indicate that heterodimerization results from the divergence of homodimeric receptors and will therefore likely be restricted to closely related homodimeric GPCRs.     

Side chain to side chain cyclization of an enkephalin analog results in loss of opioid receptor selectivity

The cyclic enkephalin analog H-Tyr-D-Lys-Gly-Phe-Glu-NH2 (I) and the structurally related open chain analogs H-Tyr-D-Nle-Gly-Phe-Gln-NH2 (II) and H-Tyr-D-Lys(For)-Gly-Phe-Abu-NH2 (III) were tested in mu and delta opioid receptor-representative binding assays and bioassays. Whereas both linear analogs showed a pronounced preference for mu receptors over delta receptors, the conformationally restricted cyclic peptide I was found to be unselective. This finding represents the first reported example of a peptide cyclization resulting in a loss of receptor selectivity. From this and earlier studies, it was concluded that the receptor selectivity of cyclized peptide analogs relative to that of their linear correlates may depend on the size and relative rigidity of their ring structures.