Turns in transmembrane helices: determination of the minimal length of a "helical hairpin" and derivation of a fine-grained turn propensity scale.

We have recently reported a first experimental turn propensity scale for transmembrane helices. This scale was derived from measurements of how efficiently a given residue placed in the middle of a 40 residue poly(Leu) stretch induces the formation of a "helical hairpin" with two rather than one transmembrane segment. We have now extended these studies, and have determined the minimum length of a poly(Leu) stretch compatible with the formation of a helical hairpin. We have also derived a more fine-grained turn propensity scale by (i) introducing each of the 20 amino acid residues into the middle of the shortest poly(Leu) stretch compatible with helical hairpin formation, and (ii) introducing pairs of residues in the middle of the 40 residue poly(Leu) stretch. The new turn propensities are consistent with the amino acid frequencies found in short hairpin loops in membrane proteins of known 3D structure.     

Insertion and hairpin formation of membrane proteins: a Monte Carlo study.

Some particular effects of a lipid membrane on the partitioning and the concomitant folding processes of model proteins have been investigated using Monte Carlo methods. It is observed that orientational order and lateral density fluctuations of the lipid matrix stabilize the orientation of helical proteins and induce a tendency of spontaneous formation of helical hairpins for helices longer than the width of the membrane. The lateral compression of the lipids on a hairpin leads to the extrusion of a loop at the trans side of the membrane. The stability of the hairpin can be increased by the design of appropriate groups of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues at the extruded loop. It is shown that in the absence of lipids the orientation of proteins is not stable and the formation of hairpins is absent. Some analogies between the formation of helical hairpins in membranes and the formation of hairpins in polymer liquid crystals are discussed. The simulations indicate that the insertion process follows a well-defined pattern of kinetic steps.     

Roles of Glu 349 and Asp 352 in membrane insertion and translocation by diphtheria toxin.

Acidic conditions within the endosomal lumen induce the T domain of receptor-bound diphtheria toxin (DT) to insert into the endosomal membrane and mediate translocation of the toxin's catalytic domain to the cytosol. A conformational rearrangement in the toxin occurring near pH5 allows a buried apolar helical hairpin of the native T domain (helices TH8 and TH9) to undergo membrane insertion. If the inserted hairpin spans the bilayer, as hypothesized, then the two acidic residues within the TL5 interhelical loop, Glu 349 and Asp 352, should become exposed at the neutral cytosolic face of the membrane and reionize. To investigate the roles of these residues in toxin action, we characterized mutant toxins in which one or both acidic residues had been replaced with nonionizable ones. Each of two double mutants examined showed a several-fold reduction in cytotoxicity in 24-h Vero cell assays (sixfold for E349A + D352A and fourfold for E349Q + D352N), whereas the individual E349Q and D352N mutations caused smaller reductions in toxicity. The single and double mutations also attenuated the toxin's ability to permeabilize Vero cells to Rb+ at low pH and decreased channel formation by the toxin in artificial planar bilayers. Neither of the double mutations affected the pH-dependence profile of the toxin's conformational rearrangement in solution, as measured by binding of the hydrophobic fluorophore, 2-p-toluidinyl-naphthalene 6-sulfonate. The results demonstrate that, although there is no absolute requirement for an acidic residue within the TL5 loop for toxicity, Glu 349 and Asp 352 do significantly enhance the biological activity of the protein. The data are consistent with a model in which ionization of these residues at the cytosolic face of the endosomal membrane stabilizes the TH8/TH9 hairpin in a transmembrane configuration, thereby facilitating channel formation and translocation of the toxin's catalytic chain.     

Modeling a conformationally sensitive region of the membrane sector of the fungal plasma membrane proton pump

A molecular model for transmembrane segments 1 and 2 from the fungal proton pumping ATPase has been developed, and this structure is predicted to form a helical hairpin loop structure in the membrane. This region was selected because it is highly conformationally active and is believed to be an important site of action for clinically important therapeutics in related animal cell enzymes. The hairpin loop is predicted to form an asymmetric tightly packed structure that is stabilized by an N-cap between D140 and V142, by hydrogen bonding between residues in the turn region and the helices, and by - interactions between closely apposed aromatic residues. A short four-residue S-shaped turn is stabilized by hydrogen bonding but is predicted to be conformationally heterogeneous. The principal effect of mutations within the hairpin head region is to destabilize the local close packing of side groups which disrupts the pattern of hydrogen bonding in and around the turn region. Depending on the mutation, this causes either a localized or a more global distortion of the primary structure in the hairpin region. These altered structures may explain the effects of mutations in transmembrane segments 1 and 2 on ATP hydrolysis, sensitivity to vanadate, and electrogenic proton transport. The conformational sensitivity of the hairpin structure around the S-turn may also account for the effects of SCH28080 and possibly ouabain in blocking ATPase function in related animal cell enzymes. Finally, the model of transmembrane segments 1 and 2 serves as a template to position transmembrane segments 3 and 8. This model provides a new view of the H⁺-ATPase that promotes novel structure/function experimentation and could serve as the basis for a more detailed model of the membrane sector of this enzyme.     

Definition of membrane topology and identification of residues important for transport in subunit a of the vacuolar ATPase

Subunit a of the vacuolar H(+)-ATPases plays an important role in proton transport. This membrane-integral 100-kDa subunit is thought to form or contribute to proton-conducting hemichannels that allow protons to gain access to and leave buried carboxyl groups on the proteolipid subunits (c, c', and c″) during proton translocation. We previously demonstrated that subunit a contains a large N-terminal cytoplasmic domain followed by a C-terminal domain containing eight transmembrane (TM) helices. TM7 contains a buried arginine residue (Arg-735) that is essential for proton transport and is located on a helical face that interacts with the proteolipid ring. To further define the topology of the C-terminal domain, the accessibility of 30 unique cysteine residues to the membrane-permeant reagent N-ethylmaleimide and the membrane-impermeant reagent polyethyleneglycol maleimide was determined. The results further define the borders of transmembrane segments in subunit a. To identify additional buried polar and charged residues important in proton transport, 25 sites were individually mutated to hydrophobic amino acids, and the effect on proton transport was determined. These and previous results identify a set of residues important for proton transport located on the cytoplasmic half of TM7 and TM8 and the lumenal half of TM3, TM4, and TM7. Based upon these data, we propose a tentative model in which the cytoplasmic hemichannel is located at the interface of TM7 and TM8 of subunit a and the proteolipid ring, whereas the lumenal hemichannel is located within subunit a at the interface of TM3, TM4, and TM7.     

Helix packing moments reveal diversity and conservation in membrane protein structure

Helical membrane proteins are more tightly packed and the packing interactions are more diverse than those found in helical soluble proteins. Based on a linear correlation between amino acid packing values and interhelical propensity, we propose the concept of a helix packing moment to predict the orientation of helices in helical membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes. We show that the helix packing moment correlates with the helix interfaces of helix dimers of single pass membrane proteins of known structure. Helix packing moments are also shown to help identify the packing interfaces in membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane helices, where a single helix can have multiple contact surfaces. Analyses are described on class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with seven transmembrane helices. We show that the helix packing moments are conserved across the class A family of GPCRs and correspond to key structural contacts in rhodopsin. These contacts are distinct from the highly conserved signature motifs of GPCRs and have not previously been recognized. The specific amino acid types involved in these contacts, however, are not necessarily conserved between subfamilies of GPCRs, indicating that the same protein architecture can be supported by a diverse set of interactions. In GPCRs, as well as membrane channels and transporters, amino acid residues with small side-chains (Gly, Ala, Ser, Cys) allow tight helix packing by mediating strong van der Waals interactions between helices. Closely packed helices, in turn, facilitate interhelical hydrogen bonding of both weakly polar (Ser, Thr, Cys) and strongly polar (Asn, Gln, Glu, Asp, His, Arg, Lys) amino acid residues. We propose the use of the helix packing moment as a complementary tool to the helical hydrophobic moment in the analysis of transmembrane sequences.     

Isolated transmembrane helices arranged across a membrane: computational studies.

A computational procedure for predicting the arrangement of an isolated helical fragment across a membrane was developed. The procedure places the transmembrane helical segment into a model triple-phase system 'water-octanol-water'; pulls the segment through the membrane, varying its 'global' position as a rigid body; optimizes the intrahelical and solvation energies in each global position by 'local' coordinates (dihedral angles of side chains); and selects the lowest energy global position for the segment. The procedure was applied to 45 transmembrane helices from the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas viridis, cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans and bacteriorhodopsin. In two thirds of the helical fragments considered, the procedure has predicted the vertical shifts of the fragments across the membrane with an accuracy of -0.15 +/- 3.12 residues compared with the experimental data. The accuracy for the remaining 15 fragments was 2.17 +/- 3.07 residues, which is about half of a helix turn. The procedure predicts the actual membrane boundaries of transmembrane helical fragments with greater accuracy than existing statistical methods. At the same time, the procedure overestimates the tilt values for the helical fragments.     

Helix kinks are equally prevalent in soluble and membrane proteins

Helix kinks are a common feature of α‐helical membrane proteins, but are thought to be rare in soluble proteins. In this study we find that kinks are a feature of long α‐helices in both soluble and membrane proteins, rather than just transmembrane α‐helices. The apparent rarity of kinks in soluble proteins is due to the relative infrequency of long helices (≥20 residues) in these proteins. We compare length‐matched sets of soluble and membrane helices, and find that the frequency of kinks, the role of Proline, the patterns of other amino acid around kinks (allowing for the expected differences in amino acid distributions between the two types of protein), and the effects of hydrogen bonds are the same for the two types of helices. In both types of protein, helices that contain Proline in the second and subsequent turns are very frequently kinked. However, there are a sizeable proportion of kinked helices that do not contain a Proline in either their sequence or sequence homolog. Moreover, we observe that in soluble proteins, kinked helices have a structural preference in that they typically point into the solvent. Proteins 2014; 82:1960–1970. © 2014 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Inter-helical hydrogen bond formation during membrane protein integration into the ER membrane

Recent work has shown that efficient di- or trimerization of hydrophobic transmembrane helices in detergent micelles or lipid bilayers can be driven by inter-helix hydrogen bonding involving polar residues such as Asn or Asp. Using in vitro translation in the presence of rough microsomes of a model integral membrane protein, we now show that the formation of so-called helical hairpins, two tightly spaced transmembrane helices connected by a short loop, can likewise be promoted by the introduction of Asn-Asn or Asp-Asp pairs in a long transmembrane hydrophobic segment. These observations suggest that inter-helix hydrogen bonds can form within the context of the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum, implying that hydrophobic segments in a nascent polypeptide chain in transit through the Sec61 channel have immediate access to a non-aqueous subcompartment within the translocon.     

Thermostability of membrane protein helix-helix interaction elucidated by statistical analysis

A prerequisite for the survival of (micro)organisms at high temperatures is an adaptation of protein stability to extreme environmental conditions. In contrast to soluble proteins, where many factors have already been identified, the mechanisms by which the thermostability of membrane proteins is enhanced are almost unknown. The hydrophobic membrane environment constrains possible stabilizing factors for transmembrane domains, so that a difference might be expected between soluble and membrane proteins. Here we present sequence analysis of predicted transmembrane helices of the genomes from eight thermophilic and 12 mesophilic organisms. A comparison of the amino acid compositions indicates that more polar residues can be found in the transmembrane helices of thermophilic organisms. Particularly, the amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid replace the corresponding amides. Cysteine residues are found to be significantly decreased by about 70% in thermophilic membrane domains suggesting a non-specific function of most cysteine residues in transmembrane domains of mesophilic organisms. By a pair-motif analysis of the two sets of transmembrane helices, we found that the small residues glycine and serine contribute more to transmembrane helix-helix interactions in thermophilic organisms. This may result in a tighter packing of the helices allowing more hydrogen bond formation.     

Analysis and prediction of helix-helix interactions in membrane channels and transporters

Membrane proteins span a large variety of different functions such as cell-surface receptors, redox proteins, ion channels, and transporters. Proteins with functional pores show different characteristics of helix-helix packing as other helical membrane proteins. We found that the helix-helix contacts of 13 nonhomologous high-resolution structures of membrane channels and transporters are mainly accomplished by weakly polar amino acids (G > S > T > F) that preferably create contacts every fourth residue, typical for right-handed helix crossings. There is a strong correlation between the now available biological hydrophobicity scale and the propensities of the weakly polar and hydrophobic residues to be buried at helix-helix interfaces or to be exposed to the lipids in membrane channels and transporters. The polar residues, however, make no major contribution towards the packing of their transmembrane helices, and are therefore subsumed to be primarily exposed to the polar milieu during the folding process. The contact formation of membrane channels and transporters is therefore ruled by the solubility of the residues, which we suppose to be the driving force for the assembly of their transmembrane helices. By contrast, in 14 nonhomologous high-resolution structures of other membrane protein coils, also large and polar amino acids (D > S > M > Q) create characteristic contacts every 3.5th residues, which is a signature for left-handed helix crossings. Accordingly, it seems that dependent on the function, different concepts of folding and stabilization are realized for helical membrane proteins. Using a sequence-based matrix prediction method these differences are exploited to improve the prediction of buried and exposed residues of transmembrane helices significantly. When the sequence motifs typical for membrane channels and transporters were applied for the prediction of helix-helix contacts the quality of prediction rises by 16% to an average value of 76%, compared to the same approach when only single amino acid positions are taken into account.     

Influence of proline residues in transmembrane helix packing

Integral membrane proteins often contain proline residues in their alpha-helical transmembrane (TM) fragments, which may strongly influence their folding and association. Pro-scanning mutagenesis of the helical domain of glycophorin A (GpA) showed that replacement of the residues located at the center abrogates helix packing while substitution of the residues forming the ending helical turns allows dimer formation. Synthetic TM peptides revealed that a point mutation of one of the residues of the dimerization motif (L75P) located at the N-terminal helical turn of the GpA TM fragment, adopts a secondary structure and oligomeric state similar to the wild-type sequence in detergents. In addition, both glycosylation mapping in biological membranes and molecular dynamics showed that the presence of a proline residue at the lipid/water interface has as an effect the extension of the helical end. Thus, helix packing can be an important factor that determines appearance of proline in TM helices. Membrane proteins might accumulate proline residues at the two ends of their TM segments in order to modulate the exposition of key amino acid residues at the interface for molecular recognition events while allowing stable association and native folding.     

Mutational analysis of tetracycline resistance protein transmembrane segment insertion

The tetracycline resistance proteins (TetA) of gram-negative bacteria are secondary active transport proteins that contain buried charged amino acids that are important for tetracycline transport. Earlier studies have shown that insertion of TetA proteins into the cytoplasmic membrane is mediated by helical hairpin pairs of transmembrane (TM) segments. However, whether helical hairpins direct spontaneous insertion of TetA or are required instead for its interaction with the cellular secretion (Sec) machinery is unknown. To gain insight into how TetA proteins are inserted into the membrane, we have investigated how tolerant the class C TetA protein encoded by plasmid pBR322 is to placement of charged residues in TM segments. The results show that the great majority of charge substitutions do not interfere with insertion even when placed at locations that cannot be shielded internally within helical hairpins. The only mutations that frequently block insertion are proline substitutions, which may interfere with helical hairpin folding. The ability of TetA to broadly tolerate charge substitutions indicates that the Sec machinery assists in its insertion into the membrane. The results also demonstrate that it is feasible to engineer charged residues into the interior of TetA proteins for the purpose of structure-function analysis.     

Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins

Helix-helix interactions are important for the folding, stability, and function of membrane proteins. Here, two independent and complementary methods are used to investigate the nature and distribution of amino acids that mediate helix-helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins. The first method characterizes the packing density of individual amino acids in helical proteins based on the van der Waals surface area occluded by surrounding atoms. We have recently used this method to show that transmembrane helices pack more tightly, on average, than helices in soluble proteins. These studies are extended here to characterize the packing of interfacial and noninterfacial amino acids and the packing of amino acids in the interfaces of helices that have either right- or left-handed crossing angles, and either parallel or antiparallel orientations. We show that the most abundant tightly packed interfacial residues in membrane proteins are Gly, Ala, and Ser, and that helices with left-handed crossing angles are more tightly packed on average than helices with right-handed crossing angles. The second method used to characterize helix-helix interactions involves the use of helix contact plots. We find that helices in membrane proteins exhibit a broader distribution of interhelical contacts than helices in soluble proteins. Both helical membrane and soluble proteins make use of a general motif for helix interactions that relies mainly on four residues (Leu, Ala, Ile, Val) to mediate helix interactions in a fashion characteristic of left-handed helical coiled coils. However, a second motif for mediating helix interactions is revealed by the high occurrence and high average packing values of small and polar residues (Ala, Gly, Ser, Thr) in the helix interfaces of membrane proteins. Finally, we show that there is a strong linear correlation between the occurrence of residues in helix-helix interfaces and their packing values, and discuss these results with respect to membrane protein structure prediction and membrane protein stability.     

Structure-function correlates of Vpu,a membrane protein of HIV-1

Vpu, a membrane protein from human immunodeficiency virus-1, folds into two distinct structural domains with different biological activities: a transmembrane (TM) helical domain involved in the budding of new virions from infected cells, and a cytoplasmic domain encompassing two amphipathic helices, which is implicated in CD4 degradation. The molecular mechanism by which Vpu facilitates virion budding is not clear. This activity of Vpu requires an intact TM helical domain. And it is known that oligomerization of the VPU TM domain results in the formation of sequence-specific, cation-selective channels. It has been shown that the channel activity of Vpu is confined to the TM domain, and that the cytoplasmic helices regulate the lifetime of the Vpu channel in the conductive state. Structure-function correlates based on the convergence of information about the channel activity of Vpu reconstituted in lipid bilayers and on its 3-D structure in membranes by a combination of solution and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy may provide valuable insights to understand the role of Vpu in the pathogenesis of AIDS and for drug design aimed to block channel activity.     

Structural analysis of synthetic peptide fragments from EmrE,a multidrug resistance protein,in a membrane-mimetic environment

EmrE, a multidrug resistance protein from Escherichia coli, renders the bacterium resistant to a variety of cytotoxic drugs by active translocation out of the cell. The 110-residue sequence of EmrE limits the number of structural possibilities that can be envisioned for this membrane protein. Four helix bundle models have been considered [Yerushalmi, H., Lebendiker, M., and Schuldiner, S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31044-31048]. The validity of EmrE structural models has been probed experimentally by investigations on overlapping peptides (ranging in length from 19 to 27 residues), derived from the sequence of EmrE. The choice of peptides was made to provide sequences of two complete, predicted transmembrane helices (peptides H1 and H3) and two helix-loop-helix motifs (peptides A and B). Peptide (B) also corresponds to a putative hairpin in a speculative beta-barrel model, with the "Pro-Thr-Gly" segment forming a turn. Structure determination in SDS micelles using NMR indicates peptide H1 to be predominantly helical, with helix boundaries in the micellar environment corroborating predicted helical limits. Peptide A adopts a helix-loop-helix structure in SDS micelles, and peptide B was also largely helical in micellar environments. An analogue peptide, C, in which the central "Pro-Thr-Gly" was replaced by "(D)Pro-Gly" displays local turn conformation at the (D)Pro-Gly segment, but neither a continuous helical stretch nor beta-hairpin formation was observed. This study implies that the constraints of membrane and micellar environments largely direct the structure of transmembrane peptides and proteins and study of judiciously selected peptide fragments can prove useful in the structural elucidation of membrane proteins.     

Hydrophobic helical hairpins: design and packing interactions in membrane environments

Helix-helix interactions within membranes are dominated by van der Waals packing motifs and side chain-side chain hydrogen bond formation, which act in tandem to determine the residues that comprise the interface between two given helices. To explore in a systematic manner the tertiary contacts between transmembrane helices, we have designed and expressed in Escherichia coli highly hydrophobic helix-loop-helix constructs of prototypic sequence K(1)KKKKKKFAIAIAIIAWAX(19)AIIAIAIAIKSPGSKIAIAIAIIAZ(44)AWAIIAIAIAFKKKKKKK(62), where "small" (Ala) and "large" (Ile) residues were used to maximize the tertiary contact area. Evidence that the two transmembrane (TM) segments in the AI construct contain an interface conducive for folding into a hairpin structure was obtained from the results that (i) the single TM AI(pep) peptide derived from the AI hairpin forms SDS-resistant dimers on PAGE gels and (ii) the corresponding sequence forms a strong dimer when examined in vivo in TOXCAT assays. Site-directed mutagenesis of AI hairpins was carried out to incorporate each of the 20 commonly occurring amino acids at X positions. Analysis on Western blots using an oligomerization assay in 12% NuPage-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) indicated that mutants with X = E, D, Q, R, N, H, and K largely formed SDS-resistant dimers-which likely correspond to H-bonded four-helix bundles-while all the others (e.g., X = F, W, L, I, M, V, C, Y, A, T, S, G, and P) remained monomeric. Systematic studies of X/Z double mutants indicated that formation of hairpin dimers is the result of the disruption of stabilizing interactions between the antiparallel helices within the AI construct. The overall results suggest that, in situations where hydrophobic van der Waals packing energy between helices is sufficient to prevent significant rotation about the major axes of interacting helices, intrahairpin side chain-side chain H-bond formation will occur mainly when pairs of polar residues are interfacially located and proximal. Knowledge of the relative contributions of these forces should be of value, for example, in clarifying the context--and the structural consequences--of disease-related mutations.     

How hydrophobic is alanine?

By a number of measures, alanine is poised at the threshold between those amino acids that promote the membrane integration of transmembrane alpha-helices and those that do not. We have measured the preference of alanine to partition into the lipid-water interface region over the central acyl chain region of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane both by its ability to promote the formation of so-called helical hairpins, i.e. a pair of transmembrane helices separated by a tight turn, and by mapping the position relative to the membrane of the lumenal end of a transmembrane alpha-helix that ends with a block of 10 alanines. Both measures show that Ala has a weak but distinct preference for the interface region, which is in agreement with recent biophysical measurements on pentaeptide partitioning in simple water-lipid or water-octanol systems (Jayasinghe, S., Hristova, K., and White, S. H. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 312, 927-934). Considering the complexity of the translocon-mediated insertion of membrane proteins into the ER, the agreement between the biochemical and biophysical measurements is striking and suggests that protein-lipid interactions are already important during the very early steps of membrane protein assembly in the ER.     

Empirical lipid propensities of amino acid residues in multispan alpha helical membrane proteins

Characterizing the interactions between amino acid residues and lipid molecules is important for understanding the assembly of transmembrane helices and for studying membrane protein folding. In this study we develop TMLIP (TransMembrane helix-LIPid), an empirically derived propensity of individual residue types to face lipid membrane based on statistical analysis of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. Lipid accessibilities of amino acid residues within the transmembrane (TM) region of 29 structures of helical membrane proteins are studied with a spherical probe of radius of 1.9 A. Our results show that there are characteristic preferences for residues to face the headgroup region and the hydrocarbon core region of lipid membrane. Amino acid residues Lys, Arg, Trp, Phe, and Leu are often found exposed at the headgroup regions of the membrane, where they have high propensity to face phospholipid headgroups and glycerol backbones. In the hydrocarbon core region, the strongest preference for interacting with lipids is observed for Ile, Leu, Phe and Val. Small and polar amino acid residues are usually buried inside helical bundles and are strongly lipophobic. There is a strong correlation between various hydrophobicity scales and the propensity of a given residue to face the lipids in the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer. Our data suggest a possibly significant contribution of the lipophobic effect to the folding of membrane proteins. This study shows that membrane proteins have exceedingly apolar exteriors rather than highly polar interiors. Prediction of lipid-facing surfaces of boundary helices using TMLIP1 results in a 54% accuracy, which is significantly better than random (25% accuracy). We also compare performance of TMLIP with another lipid propensity scale, kPROT, and with several hydrophobicity scales using hydrophobic moment analysis.     

Lipid-destabilizing properties of the hydrophobic helices H8 and H9 from colicin E1

Colicins are toxic proteins produced by Escherichia coli that must cross the membrane to exert their activity. The lipid insertion of their pf domain is linked to a conformational change which enables the penetration of a hydrophobic hairpin. They provide useful models to more generally study insertion of proteins, channel formation and protein translocation in and across membranes. In this paper, we study the lipid-destabilizing properties of helices H8 and H9 forming the hydrophobic hairpin of colicin E1. Modelling analysis suggests that those fragments behave like tilted peptides. The latter are characterized by an asymmetric distribution of their hydrophobic residues when helical. They are able to interact with a hydrophobic/hydrophilic interface (such as a lipid membrane) and to destabilize the organized system into which they insert. Fluorescence techniques using labelled liposomes clearly show that H9, and H8 to a lesser extent, destabilize lipid particles, by inducing fusion and leakage. AFM assays clearly indicate that H8 and especially H9 induce membrane fragilization. Holes in the membrane are even observed in the presence of H9. This behaviour is close to what is seen with viral fusion peptides. Those results suggest that the peptides could be involved in the toroidal pore formation of colicin E1, notably by disturbing the lipids and facilitating the insertion of the other, more hydrophilic, helices that will form the pore. Since tilted, lipid-destabilizing fragments are also common to membrane proteins and to signal sequences, we suggest that tilted peptides should have an ubiquitous role in the mechanism of insertion of proteins into membranes.