Host selection by the heteronomous hyperparasitoid Encarsia pergandiella: multiple-choice tests using Bemisia argentifolii as primary host

The ovipositional patterns of the heteronomous hyperparasitoid Encarsia pergandiella Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in the presence of its primary host Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), and in the presence or absence of conspecific and heterospecific secondary hosts (Encarsia formosa Gahan andEretmocerus mundus Mercet; Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) were examined to assess host species preferences. Host preferences by heteronomous hyperparasitoids may affect the relative abundance of co-occurring parasitoid species and may influence host population suppression by the parasitoid community. Four combinations of hosts were tested: (1) B. argentifolii, E. mundus, and E. formosa, (2) B. argentifolii, E. formosa, and E. pergandiella, (3) B. argentifolii, E. mundus, and E. pergandiella, and, (4) B. argentifolii, E. mundus, E. formosa, and E. pergandiella. Arrays of hosts (24) were constructed in Petri dishes using leaf disks, each bearing one host. Thirty arrays of each host combination were exposed to single females for 6 h. All hosts were dissected to determine number of eggs per host. Encarsia pergandiella parasitized E. formosa hosts as frequently as E. mundus hosts. However, E. pergandiella parasitized either of these heterospecific hosts more frequently than conspecific hosts in treatments including two secondary host species. When a third parasitoid species was included in host arrays, E. pergandiella parasitized conspecific hosts as frequently as heterospecific hosts. Developmental stage of the hosts did not significantly influence host species selection by E. pergandiella. Our results indicate that host selection and oviposition by heteronomous hyperparasitoids like E. pergandiella, vary with the composition of hosts available for parasitization, and suggest a preference for heterospecific over conspecific secondary hosts.     

Foraging behaviour of the whitefly parasitoidEncarsia formosa on tomato leaflets

IndividualEncarsia formosa parasitoids were observed continuously until the parasitoids flew away, either on clean tomato leaflets, on leaflets with honeydew, or on leaflets with unparasitized and parasitized whitefly larvae. Encounters with unparasitized and parasitized whitefly larvae, and contact with honeydew arrested the parasitoids on the leaflet. The walking speed increased linearly from 0.179 to 0.529 mm/s between 15 and 25–30°C. The walking activity showed another relationship with temperature: it was below 10% at 15 and 18°C, and increased to about 75% at 20, 25 and 30°C. It was not affected by host encounters or by 1 to 4 ovipositions. The total handling time of hosts was between 1.8–21.8% of the total time on the leaflet. Self-superparasitism was not observed. Conspecific-superparasitism did occur in 14% of the encounters with hosts containing a parasitoid egg, but was not observed anymore when the parasitoid egg had hatched. Experienced parasitoids superparasitized as often as naive females. The foraging behaviour ofE. formosa from landing on a leaf until departure has now been quantified and is discussed.     

Egg Size, Intrinsic Competition, and Lethal Interference in the Parasitoids Encarsia pergandiella and Encarsia formosa

Recent population dynamic theory predicts that disruption of biological control may occur when one parasitoid species' superiority in intrinsic competition is associated with a lower ability to find and exploit hosts (i.e., ability in extrinsic competition). One might expect such a trade-off, for instance, if parasitoids with larger (and fewer) eggs are more likely to prevail in intrinsic competition than species with smaller (and more numerous) eggs. We tested the idea that relative egg size could be used to predict the outcome of intrinsic competition in two closely related endoparasitoids, Encarsia pergandiella Howard and Encarsia formosa Gahan. Contrary to expectation, the parasitoid species with smaller eggs, E. pergandiella, prevailed in intrinsic competition, regardless of the order that hosts were exposed to the two species. In a literature survey, we found four studies of competing pairs of endoparasitoid species for which: (a) egg size estimates were available and (b) one species was consistently superior in intrinsic competition. In three of the four studies, the small-egged species prevailed in intrinsic competition, as we also found. Although E. formosa lost in intrinsic competition, this species negatively affected E. pergandiella's progeny production by host feeding on and killing hosts containing E. pergandiella eggs. E. formosa females also host fed on conspecific-parasitized hosts. As a mechanism of both intra- and interspecific interference competition, host feeding on parasitized hosts contradicts assumptions about the nature of interference competition in existing population dynamics models.     

Analysis of foraging behavior of the whitefly parasitoidEncarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in an experimental arena: A simulation study

Foraging ofEncarsia formosa was analyzed using a stochastic simulation model of the parasitoid's behavior. Parasitoids were allowed to search during a fixed time in an experimental arena with immatures of the greenhouse whitefly,Trialeurodes vaporariorum. The model simulates host searching, selection, and handling behavior and the physiological state (egg load) of the parasitoid. The simulated number of hosts encountered, parasitized, or killed by host feeding agreed well with observations on leaf disks. The hypothesis of random host encounter seems to be correct. The number of ovipositions on the leaf at low host densities was strongly affected by the parasitoid's walking speed and walking activity, the probability of oviposition after encountering a host, and the initial egg load. At high densities, the initial and maximum egg load were most important. A strong temperature effect was found at 18°C or below. The number of encounters, ovipositions, and host feedings increased with host density to a maximum of 25, 6.5, and 1.5, respectively, during 2 h at 25°C. The shape of the curves resembled a Holling Type II, which may be the result of the experimental procedure, where a parasitoid was confined to a patch during a fixed time.     

Parasitism ofTrialeurodes ricini byEncarsia formosa: Level of parasitism,development time and mortality on different host plants

The effects of the host plant on the level of parasitism, development time and mortality ofEncarsia formosa Gahan parasitizing castor whitefly,Trialeurodes ricini Misra were studied. The level of parasitism varied significantly between host plants; ranging from an average high of 13/50T. ricini larvae parasitized per parasitoid per day on aubergine to an average low of 1.6/50 host larvae on potato. Development time ofE. formosa varied according to whitefly host plant; minimum average development time was 17.7 days on cotton. The mortality ofE. formosa was high on all host plants tested, and the type of host plant had no significant influence on mortality. Aubergine proved to be the most satisfactory laboratory plant for rearingE. formosa onT. ricini.     

Egg allocation of the autoparasitoid encarsia tricolor at different relative densities of the primary host (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) and two secondary hosts (Encarsia formosa and E. tricolor)

Parasitism, offspring sex ratio and superparasitism of the facultative autoparasitoid Encarsia tricolor Foërster (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) when given access to arenae with different proportions of the primary host (Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood)) and two species of secondary hosts (E. tricolor and Encarsia formosa Gahan) were studied.Parasitism and offspring sex ratio were not affected by female age in the range 3–10 days old. When the secondary hosts were young E. tricolor pupae, eggs were mostly laid on primary hosts, so the offspring sex ratio was more female-biased than expected, and secondary hosts were not superparasitized at all. When the secondary hosts were fully grown E. formosa larvae, superparasitism was small and offspring sex ratio was more male-biased than expected. E. tricolor females were able to discriminate between hosts previously parasitized by themselves and non-parasitized hosts.     

Hyperparasitism behaviour of the autoparasitoid <Emphasis Type="Italic">Encarsia tricolor</Emphasis> on two secondary host species

Hyperparasitism by virgin female Encarsia tricolor was studied by direct observation of its behaviour when contacting two secondary host species (Encarsia formosa and E. tricolor) at different host stages (first and second larval stage, third larval stage, and pupal stage). The searching and hyperparasitism behavioural sequence of E. tricolor was independent of the host stage of the whitefly (Aleyrodes proletella), and was similar to several related primary parasitoid species. In experiments with equal numbers of secondary hosts, encounter frequencies were equal for both secondary host species in all developmental stages observed. However, rates of hyperparastism were different according to host stage and host species. Hosts in the late larval stages were most preferred for hyperparasitization and the heterospecific E. formosa was more preferred as a secondary host than the conspecific, E. tricolor, in particular from the prepupal stage onwards. The window of vulnerability, i.e., the duration of the period in which a secondary host is susceptible to hyperparasitism, was largely determined by the occurrence and rate of melanization after the onset of pupation. The duration of a successful hyperparasitization event was longer than one that failed. Superparasitism occurred only once in all cases. The potential effect of autoparasitoids on biological control programs and the consequences for selection and release of an effective, yet ecologically safe agent are discussed. Handling editor: Torsten Meiners.     

Secondary host choice by the autoparasitoid Encarsia pergandiella

Autoparasitoids are species of parasitic wasps in the family Aphelinidae which produce females as solitary primary endoparasitoids of homopterans such as whitefly and scale insects (primary hosts), and males as solitary hyperparasitoids. Males generally develop on immature conspecific females or on individuals of other primary parasitoid species (secondary hosts). Encarsia pergandiella is an autoparasitoid that has been introduced to Italy for control of greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum, in greenhouses and field crops. In this study we examined the secondary host selection behaviour of this species with regard to conspecific females and females of two thelytokous species, E. formosa and E. meritoria. Encarsia formosa has been used successfully for greenhouse whitefly control in Northern Europe, but has not been effective in Southern Italy in winter crops in unheated greenhouses. E. meritoria has recently spread in Italy, and may have potential for biological control of whitefly in the greenhouse environment. In the first experiment, female E. pergandiella were exposed to one of three pair-wise combinations of the three species in petri dish arenas. Parasitism was determined by dissection of the hosts. The number of hosts parasitized by E. pergandiella females did not differ with host species. However, significantly greater numbers of eggs were laid in E. meritoria in both treatments in which it was present; these hosts were more likely to be superparasitized. In a second experiment, observations of females in arenas with equal numbers of all three host species indicated that females encountered and parasitized all host species with approximately equal frequency, although the length of time females spent in the oviposition posture differed with host species.     

Interspecific competition between the braconid endoparasitoids Glyptapanteles porthetriae and Glyptapanteles liparidis in Lymantria dispar larvae

The effect of interspecific competition between the solitary endoparasitoid Glyptapanteles porthetriae Muesebeck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the gregarious Glyptapanteles liparidis Bouché (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), was investigated in larvae of Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Host larvae were parasitized by both wasp species simultaneously in premolt to the 2^nd or the 3^rd host instar or in an additional approach with a 4-day delay in parasitization by the second wasp species. Host acceptance experiments revealed that both wasp species do not discriminate between unparasitized host larvae and larvae parasitized previously by the same or the other species. In more than 90% female wasps parasitized the larva they encountered first. During the period of endoparasitic development, larvae of the competing parasitoid species never attacked the egg stage of the other species. When host larvae were parasitized simultaneously by both wasp species, the rate of successful development of both species depended on the age of the host larva at the time of its parasitization; G. liparidis emerged successfully from 44% of host larvae parasitized during the premolt to 2^nd instar, G. porthetriae from 28%, and in 20% of the hosts both parasitoid species were able to develop in one gypsy moth larva. However, when host larvae were parasitized simultaneously during premolt to the 3^rd instar, G. liparidis was successful in 90% of the hosts, compared to 8% from which only G. porthetriae emerged. In the experiments with delayed oviposition, generally the species that oviposited first succeeded in completing its larval development. Larvae of the species ovipositing with four days delay were frequently attacked and killed by larvae of the first parasitizing species or suffered reduced growth. As the secondary parasitoid species, G. porthetriae-larvae were never able to complete their development, whereas G. liparidis developed successfully in at least 12,5% of the multiparasitized host larvae. Thus, multiparasitism of gypsy moth larvae by both Glyptapanteles species corresponds to the contest type; however, G. porthetriae is only able to develop successfully as the primary parasitoid of young host larvae.     

Survival of the parasitoidEncarsia formosa after treatment of parasitized greenhouse whitefly larvae with fungal spores ofAschersonia aleyrodis

The interaction between the entomopathogenic fungusAschersonia aleyrodis and the parasitoidEncarsia formosa on greenhouse whitefly as a host organism was studied, in particular, the survival of the parasitoid after treatment of parasitized hosts with fungal spores. The mean number of parasitized black pupae per parasitoid produced at 25°C was significantly reduced after spore treatment in the first three days following parasitization. Spore treatment four, seven or ten days after parasitization resulted in a mean number of parasitized pupae not significantly different from the number of black pupae in the control. The rather sudden change from low to high survival of parasitized hosts when treated with spores four days after parasitization in spite of high numbers of infected unparasitized larvae, coincided with the hatching of the parasitoid larva from the egg inside the host. Possible reasons for this decrease in susceptibility to infection after parasitoid egg hatch, such as induced changes in host cuticle or haemolymph, are discussed. Parasitoids emerged from treated hosts did not show differences in reproduction compared with parasitoids emerging from untreated hosts. Both natural enemeies of whitefly are compatible to a great extent.     

Parasitism,host feeding and immature development of Encarsia formosa reared from Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Bemisia tabaci on Trialeurodes ricini

Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a thelytokous parasitoid, is an important biological control agent of whiteflies because of its outstanding reproduction and host‐feeding ability. In this study, we evaluated the parasitism, host feeding and developmental time of E. formosa populations reared on Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (EFT) or on Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (EFB) when different nymphal instars of the castor whitefly, Trialeurodes ricini (Misra), were offered as hosts, with an aim to understand the preference of the parasitoid on nymphal instars of T. ricini. Experiments were conducted on castor bean plants at 26 ± 2°C, 50–60% RH and 16 : 8 (L : D) photoperiod. The results showed that E. formosa successfully oviposited and fed on all nymphal instars of T. ricini. However, numbers of the first instars fed on by the E. formosa populations reared on T. vaporariorum (EFT) and B. tabaci (EFB) were significantly greater (45.9 and 31.3, respectively) than those of the second (EFT: 30.4 and EFB: 15.8), the third (EFT: 22.4 and EFB: 13.2) and the fourth nymphal instars (EFT: 6.0 and EFB: 3.8). The number of T. ricini nymphs parasitized by E. formosa varied significantly among different instars, and the parasitism rates on the first instar (EFT: 15.2; EFB: 7.7) and fourth instar (EFT: 19.3; EFB: 4.9) were greater than those on the second and third instars. Encarsia formosa reared on T. vaporariorum had a significantly higher host feeding and ovipositing potential on T. ricini than EFB. When parasitizing the fourth instar nymphs, E. formosa completed development in a significantly shorter time (12.9 day) than when ovipositing in other instars (17.8–19.1 day). These results showed that EFT had a better host adaption than EFB. The information from this study should be useful for us to better understand the performance and nymphal preference of E. formosa from T. vaporariorum and B. tabaci when they parasitized and fed on T. ricini, and the interactions of parasitoids with different host whitefly species.     

Variation between laboratory populations in the performance of the parasitoid Encarsia formosa on two host species, Bemisia tabaci and Trialeurodes vaporariorum

We tested the hypothesis that populations of the parthenogenetic parasitic wasp Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) differed in their ability to use two different host species, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Of the three wasp populations tested, two populations had been reared for many generations on B. tabaci and one population had been reared for many years on T. vaporariorum. Performance was measured by the number of whitefly nymphs that were successfully parasitized by individual wasps, and performance on either host was measured in separate experiments. There was variation between wasp populations in their performance on the host B. tabaci, with one wasp population reared for many years on this host performing considerably better than the other two populations. There were no significant differences between populations in their use of the preferred host, T. vaporariorum. The experiments were conducted in such a way that we could distinguish heritable differences between populations from environmentally-induced conditioning differences due to the immediate host from which an individual wasp enclosed. In either experiment there were no significant effects of conditioning, although there was a trend within each population for wasps conditioned on T. vaporariorum to have higher performance than those conditioned on B. tabaci. Thirdly, we conducted a selection experiment, initiated with wasps from a single population historically reared on T. vaporariorum, to measure the effect of laboratory rearing on different hosts for 17 generations. We did not see any difference in the performance of wasps on B. tabaci after this period of rearing on either of the two hosts. In summary, populations of E. formosa do differ in their relative performance on B. tabaci. The one population that was tested further did not show any response to selection by rearing, but the ability to respond to selection on performance may not be equal for all populations. The possibility that wasp populations have differential performance on particular hosts may affect the use of this species as a biological control agent.     

Effects of selected botanical insecticides on the behaviour and mortality of the glasshouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum and the parasitoid Encarsia formosa

Toxicity and behavioural bioassays were used to assess the lethal and sub-lethal effects of two naphthoquinones from the Chilean plant Calceolaria andina L. (Scrophulariaceae), two products derived from Azadirachta indica and pyrethrum on the glasshouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood, and the parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan. The potential use of these botanicals in an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programme is discussed. Pyrethrum was the most toxic botanical tested, but it was toxic to both the whitefly and parasitoid. The naphthoquinones showed potential for inclusion into an IPM programme if, by formulation, the toxicity towards the whitefly could be increased and the deterrent activity towards E. formosa adults decreased. Overall, the A. indica-derived products had the most potential for use in an IPM system for the control of whitefly, which includes E. formosa as a biocontrol agent.     

Temperature dependent functional response ofEncarsia formosa parasitizing the Poinsettia-strain of the cotton whitefly,bemisia tabaci, on Poinsettia

The control efficiency and performance ofEncarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) as influenced by the density of its host, the Poinsettia-strain ofBemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), were investigated by laboratory experiments on Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrrima Willd.).E. formosa showed a Type II functional response to fourth instar larvae ofB. tabaci, the response plateau increasing with temperature. A response model for randomly searching parasitoids incorporating temperature-dependent handling time and temperature-independent search rate was in accordance with the results, and gave an estimated search rate of 0.033 leaf·hour⁻¹ and handling times of 1.54, 2.86 and 20.1 h at 28°C, 22°C and 16°C, respectively. From the latter, the maximum number of hosts that can be parasitized at the three temperatures are 10.4, 5.6 and 0.8 larvae per day (provided the light period is 16 h). The number of hosts with ovipositor punctures was higher than the number of parasitized hosts, especially at 22°C and 28°C, implying thatE. formosa refrains from laying eggs in some of the hosts examined with the ovipositor. About 31% of the punctured larvae did not contain any eggs. Superparasitism occured during the experiment presumably originating from young, inexperienced parasitoids. Individual larvae were occasionally punctured several times, also by non-superparasitizingE. formosa. The resulting distribution of ovipositior holes was random, indicating thatE. formosa on the basis of antennal testing is unable to determine if a larva has previously been examined with the ovipositor. Almost fifty percent of the punctures were not followed by egg-depositions. Besides parasitizationE. formosa used hosts as food source. The number of hostfed larvae was independent of density, but varied with temperature being highest at 28°C (0.12 hostfed larvae per parasitoid per day).     

Intra- and interspecific host discrimination in two closely related egg parasitoids

Intraspecific host discrimination is frequently found in solitary parasitoids, but interspecific host discrimination, where female parasitoids recognize hosts already parasitized by females of other species, is rare. This particular behaviour appears to be adaptive only under specific circumstances. In this paper, we quantified intraspecific host discrimination in Anaphes n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an endoparasitoid of the eggs of Listronotus oregonensis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and interspecific host discrimination toward eggs parasitized by Anaphes sordidatus (Girault), a sympatric species competing for the same resource in similar habitats. To examine host discrimination, choice experiments were used where the females had to choose between different categories of eggs (unparasitized, parasitized by Anaphes n. sp. or A. sordidatus). Superparasitism and multiparasitism were avoided in experiments where the female had a choice between unparasitized hosts and hosts parasitized by the same female, by a conspecific or by a female A. sordidatus. When all hosts available were parasitized, conspecific superparasitism occurred more often than self-superparasitism or multiparasitism. These results indicated that females Anaphes n. sp. were capable of self-, conspecific and interspecific discrimination. Self-discrimination followed recognition of an external marking while interspecific discrimination occurred mostly after insertion of the ovipositor. Interspecific discrimination could result from the recent speciation of these species and could be associated with a genotypic discrimination. This behavior appears to be adaptive because of the competition for common hosts between the two parasitoid species.     

Influence of pesticide treatments on the dynamics of whiteflies and associated parasitoids in snap bean fields

To determine the influence of pesticidetreatments on the population dynamics of thewhiteflies Trialeurodes vaporariorum(Westwood) and Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae)and their naturally occurring parasitoids, weperformed field experiments on insecticidesprayed and unsprayed fields during a croppingseason of snap bean in Pradera, Valle delCauca, Colombia. Substantially largerpopulations of whitefly nymphs occurred in theunsprayed field than in the sprayed field. Parasitoids were more frequent in unsprayedthan in sprayed fields with Encarsianigricephala Dozier being more prevalent thanAmitus fuscipennis MacGown & Nebeker. Insprayed fields the nymphs parasitized by E. nigricephala exceeded the unparasitizedwhitefly nymphs at the end of the croppingseason. Our results suggest that while undercurrent agricultural practices whiteflies onsnap beans cannot be exclusively controlled bynaturally occurring parasitoids, parasitoidsmay be integrated with chemical control inorder to reduce crop damage.     

Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Two Aphelinid Parasitoids of the Greenhouse Whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum under Summer vs. Winter Conditions in a Temperate Climate

Searching behaviour of two aphelinid parasitoids, Encarsia formosa Gahan and Eretmocerus eremicus Rose and Zolnerowich, was compared in a controlled environment under simulated summer [high light intensity (83 ± 1 W/m²), and 24 ± 1°C] and winter [low light intensity (11 ± 0.5 W/m²), and 20 ± 1°C] greenhouse conditions on tomato leaflets, with and without a single 3rd instar whitefly host, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), within a 4-cm tomato leaflet arena. Residence time of both parasitoid species was longer on infested leaflets vs. clean leaflets, and longer under winter than summer conditions. When parasitoids encountered a host on infested leaflets, residence time increased. In all cases, residence time of E. formosa was longer that of E. eremicus. Proportion of time spent searching (i.e. antennating leaf surface while walking or standing still) was longer on clean vs. infested leaflets for both E. formosa and E. eremicus. Walking speed by E. eremicus on clean leaflets was faster than E. formosa under both summer and winter conditions. Host handling time and proportion of host acceptance did not vary among parasitoids. These findings suggest that E. eremicus could be more efficient in host finding on tomato leaflets than E. formosa over all seasons, especially in the winter when natural light is limiting and where daylight temperatures are ≥20°C.     

Colonization of tomato greenhouses by the predatory mirid bugs Macrolophus caliginosus and Dicyphus tamaninii

Colonization of tomato greenhouses by native predatory mirid bugs at the end of the spring cycle is common in the western Mediterranean area when no broad-spectrum insecticides are applied. Due to their polyphagy, these predators interact with pest populations and also with other natural enemies present in the crop. In this work we evaluate the abundance and timing of greenhouse colonization by these predators and their interaction with the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum, a key crop pest, and its introduced parasitoid Encarsia formosa. Although quite unpredictable, natural colonization of greenhouses by Macrolophus caliginosus and Dicyphus tamaninii, the two predominant species in our location, usually leads to the establishment of predator populations in the crop that subsequently prey on greenhouse whitefly. No preference for parasitized pupae was observed in greenhouse samples, while laboratory experiments revealed a marked tendency to avoid parasitoid pupae. In our area, IPM programs for greenhouse tomatoes and other vegetables should take advantage of the presence of this predator complex by allowing the immigration and establishment of its populations without disturbing them with highly toxic and non-selective insecticides.     

Self-, Intra-, and Interspecific Host Discrimination in Telenomus busseolae Gahan and T. isis Polaszek (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), Sympatric Egg Parasitoids of the African Cereal Stem Borer Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Oviposition behavior, intra- and interspecific host discrimination, and super- and multiparasitism by the scelionids Telenomus busseolae and T. isis were studied using batches of eggs of the noctuid stalk borer Sesamia calamistis as the host. Both Telenomus species were able to discern eggs already parasitized. As a result, self-superparasitism was only 4.0% for T. busseolae and 5.8% for T. isis. Likewise, intraspecific superparasitism was avoided by both species and was significantly higher for T. busseolae than T. isis, and higher when parasitized eggs were offered immediately (0 h) and after 48 h than after 24 h; apparently, the recognition of parasitized eggs at 24 and 48 h was based on the presence of parasitoid larvae rather than a specific marking substance. Multiparasitism was avoided if the female had a choice between unparasitized and parasitized eggs. In a choice experiment, it was 10.2 and 2.5% for T. busseolae and T. isis, respectively. In a nonchoice experiment, multiparasitism did not vary between species and time treatment; it was low, varying between 9.6 and 24.1%. In the 0-h treatment, T. busseolae always outcompeted T. isis, accounting for 63.4 or 91.7% of the offspring, when T. isis or T. busseolae, respectively, was the first species. In the 24-h treatment, the first species emerged more often than the second did but the host egg mortality, i.e., eggs from which neither borer larvae nor parasitoid emerged, was >40%. Whereas T. busseolae is ubiquitous in Africa, T. isis has never been reported from eastern Africa, and it has been proposed for introduction against the prevailing noctuid pest Bussoela fusca. Based on earlier life table and host suitability studies and on the present findings, it is concluded that T. isis would establish in the midaltitudes but not the highlands of eastern Africa.     

Variation between laboratory populations of Encarsia formosa in their parasitization behavior on the host Bemisia tabaci

We tested the hypothesis that two populations of the parasitoid Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) differed in their behavioral interactions with the whitefly host Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). The two wasp populations were studied because previous work suggested large differences between the populations in performance on this host. In this study the populations differed behaviorally in both the number of hosts encountered and their reactions to hosts once encountered. The population reared for many years on Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) that previously performed more poorly on B. tabaci had a higher host encounter rate but rejected hosts more frequently. The population reared for a number of years on B. tabaci encountered fewer hosts but accepted a higher percentage of hosts for oviposition. The number of parasitized hosts did not differ between the two populations, however. These data demonstrate that there are heritable differences between these two populations of asexual wasps in host-associated behavioral traits. These behavioral differences in host acceptance do not explain performance differences seen in the earlier study, however, possibly due to different conditions between the two experiments.