Phytochrome B Promotes Branching in Arabidopsis by Suppressing Auxin Signaling

Many plants respond to competition signals generated by neighbors by evoking the shade avoidance syndrome, including increased main stem elongation and reduced branching. Vegetation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition signal sensed by phytochromes. Plants deficient in phytochrome B (phyB) exhibit a constitutive shade avoidance syndrome including reduced branching. Because auxin in the polar auxin transport stream (PATS) inhibits axillary bud outgrowth, its role in regulating the phyB branching phenotype was tested. Removing the main shoot PATS auxin source by decapitation or chemically inhibiting the PATS strongly stimulated branching in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) deficient in phyB, but had a modest effect in the wild type. Whereas indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) levels were elevated in young phyB seedlings, there was less IAA in mature stems compared with the wild type. A split plate assay of bud outgrowth kinetics indicated that low auxin levels inhibited phyB buds more than the wild type. Because the auxin response could be a result of either the auxin signaling status or the bud’s ability to export auxin into the main shoot PATS, both parameters were assessed. Main shoots of phyB had less absolute auxin transport capacity compared with the wild type, but equal or greater capacity when based on the relative amounts of native IAA in the stems. Thus, auxin transport capacity was unlikely to restrict branching. Both shoots of young phyB seedlings and mature stem segments showed elevated expression of auxin-responsive genes and expression was further increased by auxin treatment, suggesting that phyB suppresses auxin signaling to promote branching.The development of shoot branches is a multistep process with many potential points of regulation. After the formation of an axillary meristem in the leaf axil, an axillary bud may form through the generation of leaves and other tissues. The axillary bud may grow out to form a branch, or may remain dormant or semidormant for an indefinite period of time (Bennett and Leyser, 2006). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the position of the bud in the rosette is a strong determinant of its fate, with upper buds displaying greater outgrowth potential than lower buds. In fact, the varying potential of buds at different positions is maintained even in buds that are activated to form branches, with the upper buds growing out first and most robustly, and lower buds growing out after a time lag and with less vigor (Hempel and Feldman, 1994; Finlayson et al., 2010).The disparate fate of buds at different rosette positions is mediated, at least in part, by the process of correlative inhibition, whereby remote parts of the plant inhibit the outgrowth of the buds (Cline, 1997). Correlative inhibition is typically associated with the bud-inhibiting effects of auxin sourced in the shoot apex and transported basipetally in the polar auxin transport stream (PATS). Auxin in the PATS does not enter the bud and thus must act indirectly; however, the exact mechanism by which auxin inhibits bud outgrowth is not well understood, despite many years of intensive study (Waldie et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). Evidence supports divergent models by which auxin may regulate branching. One model contends that the PATS modulates a bud outgrowth inhibiting second messenger (Brewer et al., 2009). Another model postulates a mechanism whereby competition between the main shoot and the axillary bud for auxin export in the PATS regulates bud activity (Bennett et al., 2006; Prusinkiewicz et al., 2009; Balla et al., 2011).In addition to intrinsic developmental programming, branching is also modulated by environmental signals, including competition signals generated by neighboring plants. The red light:far-red light ratio (R:FR) is an established competition signal that is modified (reduced) by neighboring plants and sensed by the phytochrome family of photoreceptors. A low R:FR evokes the shade avoidance syndrome with plants displaying, among other phenotypes, enhanced shoot elongation and reduced branching (Smith, 1995; Ballaré, 1999; Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Casal, 2012). Phytochrome B (phyB) is the major sensor contributing to R:FR responses, and loss of phyB function results in a plant that displays a phenotype similar to constitutive shade avoidance. It should be noted that actual shade avoidance is mediated by additional phytochromes and that the complete absence of functional phyB in the loss-of-function mutant may also result in a phenotype that does not exactly mirror shade avoidance. Loss of phyB function leads to reduced branching and altered expression of genes associated with hormone pathways and bud development in the axillary buds (Kebrom et al., 2006; Finlayson et al., 2010; Kebrom et al., 2010; Su et al., 2011). In Arabidopsis, phyB deficiency differentially affects the outgrowth of buds from specific positions in the rosette and thus demonstrates an important function in the regulation of correlative inhibition (Finlayson et al., 2010; Su et al., 2011), a process known to be influenced by auxin. Many aspects of auxin signaling are dependent on AUXIN RESISTANT1 (AXR1), which participates in activating the Skip-Cullin-F-box auxin signaling module (del Pozo et al., 2002). Reduced auxin signaling resulting from AXR1 deficiency enabled phyB-deficient plants to branch profusely and reduced correlative inhibition, thus establishing auxin signaling downstream of phyB action (Finlayson et al., 2010). Although a link between auxin signaling and phyB regulation of branching was demonstrated, the details of the interaction were not discovered.The relationship between auxin and shade avoidance responses has been investigated in some detail. Auxin signaling was implicated in shade avoidance responses mediated by ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX PROTEIN2 in young Arabidopsis seedlings (Steindler et al., 1999). Rapid changes in leaf development resulting from canopy shade were also shown to involve TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1-dependent auxin signaling (Carabelli et al., 2007). A link between auxin abundance and the response to the R:FR was demonstrated in Arabidopsis deficient for the TRP AMINOTRANSFERASE OF ARABIDOPSIS1 (TAA1) auxin biosynthetic enzyme (Tao et al., 2008). Young wild-type seedlings respond to a decreased R:FR by increasing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis, accumulating IAA, increasing hypocotyl and petiole elongation, and increasing leaf elevation. However, these responses are reduced in plants deficient in TAA1. Subsequent studies confirmed the importance of auxin in responses to the R:FR (Pierik et al., 2009; Kozuka et al., 2010; Keller et al., 2011), and also identified the auxin transporter PIN-FORMED3 as essential for hypocotyl elongation responses in young seedlings (Keuskamp et al., 2010). In addition to the roles of auxin abundance and transport in the process, auxin sensitivity has also been implicated in shade avoidance. Several auxin signaling genes are direct targets of the phytochrome signaling component PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR5 (PIF5), and these genes are misregulated in Arabidopsis deficient in either PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4) or PIF5 (Hornitschek et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2013). Auxin-responsive hypocotyl elongation and auxin-induced gene expression were also reduced in young seedlings of the pif4pif5 double mutant (Hornitschek et al., 2012), which show defects in shade avoidance responses (Lorrain et al., 2008).Although some aspects of the regulation of branching are now understood, there are still many gaps in our knowledge of the process, especially as related to the regulation of branching by light signals. Because auxin is known to play a major role in regulating branch development, and because recent studies have implicated auxin in general shade avoidance responses and specifically in the regulation of branching by phyB, the hypothesis that auxin homeostasis, transport, and/or signaling may contribute to the hypobranching phenotype of phyB-deficient plants was generated and tested, using a variety of physiological and molecular approaches.     

Clathrin Light Chains Regulate Clathrin-Mediated Trafficking,Auxin Signaling,and Development in Arabidopsis

Plant clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking is involved in many developmental processes as well as in responses to environmental cues. Previous studies have shown that clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the plasma membrane (PM) auxin transporter PIN-FORMED1 is regulated by the extracellular auxin receptor AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1 (ABP1). However, the mechanisms by which ABP1 and other factors regulate clathrin-mediated trafficking are poorly understood. Here, we applied a genetic strategy and time-resolved imaging to dissect the role of clathrin light chains (CLCs) and ABP1 in auxin regulation of clathrin-mediated trafficking in Arabidopsis thaliana. Auxin was found to differentially regulate the PM and trans-Golgi network/early endosome (TGN/EE) association of CLCs and heavy chains (CHCs) in an ABP1-dependent but TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1/AUXIN-BINDING F-BOX PROTEIN (TIR1/AFB)-independent manner. Loss of CLC2 and CLC3 affected CHC membrane association, decreased both internalization and intracellular trafficking of PM proteins, and impaired auxin-regulated endocytosis. Consistent with these results, basipetal auxin transport, auxin sensitivity and distribution, and root gravitropism were also found to be dramatically altered in clc2 clc3 double mutants, resulting in pleiotropic defects in plant development. These results suggest that CLCs are key regulators in clathrin-mediated trafficking downstream of ABP1-mediated signaling and thus play a critical role in membrane trafficking from the TGN/EE and PM during plant development.     

Spatiotemporal Regulation of Lateral Root Organogenesis in Arabidopsis by Cytokinin

The architecture of a plant’s root system, established postembryonically, results from both coordinated root growth and lateral root branching. The plant hormones auxin and cytokinin are central endogenous signaling molecules that regulate lateral root organogenesis positively and negatively, respectively. Tight control and mutual balance of their antagonistic activities are particularly important during the early phases of lateral root organogenesis to ensure continuous lateral root initiation (LRI) and proper development of lateral root primordia (LRP). Here, we show that the early phases of lateral root organogenesis, including priming and initiation, take place in root zones with a repressed cytokinin response. Accordingly, ectopic overproduction of cytokinin in the root basal meristem most efficiently inhibits LRI. Enhanced cytokinin responses in pericycle cells between existing LRP might restrict LRI near existing LRP and, when compromised, ectopic LRI occurs. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that young LRP are more sensitive to perturbations in the cytokinin activity than are developmentally more advanced primordia. We hypothesize that the effect of cytokinin on the development of primordia possibly depends on the robustness and stability of the auxin gradient.     

Focus Issue on the Plant Physiology of Global Change: A Nitrogen-Regulated Glutamine Amidotransferase (GAT1_2.1) Represses Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis

Shoot branching in plants is regulated by many environmental cues and by specific hormones such as strigolactone (SL). We show that the GAT1_2.1 gene (At1g15040) is repressed over 50-fold by nitrogen stress, and is also involved in branching control. At1g15040 is predicted to encode a class I glutamine amidotransferase (GAT1), a superfamily for which Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 30 potential members. Most members can be categorized into known biosynthetic pathways, for the amidation of known acceptor molecules (e.g. CTP synthesis). Some members, like GAT1_2.1, are of unknown function, likely involved in amidation of unknown acceptors. A gat1_2.1 mutant exhibits a significant increase in shoot branching, similar to mutants in SL biosynthesis. The results suggest that GAT1_2.1 is not involved in SL biosynthesis since exogenously applied GR24 (a synthetic SL) does not correct the mutant phenotype. The subfamily of GATs (GATase1_2), with At1g15040 as the founding member, appears to be present in all plants (including mosses), but not other organisms. This suggests a plant-specific function such as branching control. We discuss the possibility that the GAT1_2.1 enzyme may activate SLs (e.g. GR24) by amidation, or more likely could embody a new pathway for repression of branching.Shoot branching plays an important role in establishing plant body plans during development and growth, also conferring the flexibility for plants to respond to environmental stresses. The control of bud growth/branching has been studied for many decades with much interest stemming from its value in agriculture. Indeed, many of our domesticated crops have been bred for modified branching to optimize yields. In early studies, auxin synthesized in the shoot apex was proposed to act indirectly to inhibit bud outgrowth, while cytokinin (CK) synthesized in the roots promoted bud outgrowth (Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). Studies on auxin inhibition suggested there should be another signal mediating bud growth control (Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). In the past decade, studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other plants have addressed this signal. Identification and characterization of mutants with increased branching in garden pea (Pisum sativum), Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), and Petunia hybrida demonstrated the existence of a long-distance signaling pathway that regulates shoot branching (Beveridge et al., 1996, 1997; Napoli, 1996; Stirnberg et al., 2002, 2007; Sorefan et al., 2003; Booker et al., 2004; Arite et al., 2007; Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009, 2011; Zhang et al., 2010). Later, studies on pea (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008) and rice (Umehara et al., 2008) demonstrated unequivocally that this hormone (or its precursor) is strigolactone (SL). Currently, it is proposed that SL acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth (Brewer et al., 2009). It is also likely that SL and auxin have the capacity to modulate each other’s levels and distribution in a dynamic feedback loop required for the branching control (Ferguson and Beveridge, 2009; Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010). The interaction between SL and CK during bud outgrowth is less understood, although recent studies in pea indicate that SL and CK act antagonistically on bud growth (Dun et al., 2012).Branching is also modulated in response to environmental conditions, including nutrient supply. Generally, nutrient deficiency in soil causes a reduction in shoot to root ratio, resulting in decreased shoot branching (Lafever, 1981). Under nitrogen or phosphate limitation, elevated levels of SL repress shoot branching in rice, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and Arabidopsis (Yoneyama et al., 2007; López-Ráez et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Kohlen et al., 2011), and possibly increase lateral root formation (Ruyter-Spira et al., 2011). This makes sense physiologically, diverting resources to roots from shoots to scavenge more nutrients. The basis for modulation of SL levels or nutrient-dependent branching control is not understood.Here, we report a novel gene, GAT1_2.1 (At1g15040), predicted to encode a class I Gln amidotransferase (GAT1) in Arabidopsis, is highly repressed by long-term nitrogen stress (down 57-fold), and that mutation of this gene leads to an enhanced branching phenotype. Thus, this gene may present a link between the nitrogen stress response and branching control.