The endoplasmic reticulum HSP40 co‐chaperone ERdj3/DNAJB11 assembles and functions as a tetramer

ERdj3/DNAJB11 is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)‐targeted HSP40 co‐chaperone that performs multifaceted functions involved in coordinating ER and extracellular proteostasis. Here, we show that ERdj3 assembles into a native tetramer that is distinct from the dimeric structure observed for other HSP40 co‐chaperones. An electron microscopy structural model of full‐length ERdj3 shows that these tetramers are arranged as a dimer of dimers formed by distinct inter‐subunit interactions involving ERdj3 domain II and domain III. Targeted deletion of residues 175‐190 within domain II renders ERdj3 a stable dimer that is folded and efficiently secreted from mammalian cells. This dimeric ERdj3 shows impaired substrate binding both in the ER and extracellular environments and reduced interactions with the ER HSP70 chaperone BiP. Furthermore, we show that overexpression of dimeric ERdj3 exacerbates ER stress‐dependent reductions in the secretion of a destabilized, aggregation‐prone protein and increases its accumulation as soluble oligomers in extracellular environments. These results reveal ERdj3 tetramerization as an important structural framework for ERdj3 functions involved in coordinating ER and extracellular proteostasis in the presence and absence of ER stress.     

Escaping the endoplasmic reticulum: why does a molecular chaperone leave home for greener pastures?

Molecular chaperones reside in nearly every organelle within a eukaryotic cell, and in each of these compartments, they ensure that protein homeostasis (or proteostasis) is maintained. In this issue, Wiseman and colleagues find that an ER lumenal chaperone escapes this compartment when a specific stress pathway is activated. The chaperone, an Hsp40 homolog known as ERdj3, transits through the secretory pathway to the extracellular space. During this journey, ERdj3 can escort an aggregation‐prone protein or it can identify aggregation‐prone proteins extracellularly, thereby functioning outside of its normal environment.     

Inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress and alters lysosomal morphology and distribution

Disturbances in proteostasis are observed in many neurodegenerative diseases. This leads to activation of protein quality control to restore proteostasis, with a key role for the removal of aberrant proteins by proteolysis. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a protein quality control mechanism of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that is activated in several neurodegenerative diseases. Recently we showed that the major proteolytic pathway during UPR activation is via the autophagy/lysosomal system. Here we investigate UPR induction if the other major proteolytic pathway of the ER -ER associated degradation (ERAD)-is inhibited. Surprisingly, impairment of ERAD results in decreased UPR activation and protects against ER stress toxicity. Autophagy induction is not affected under these conditions, however, a striking relocalization of the lysosomes is observed. Our data suggest that a protective UPR-modulating mechanism is activated if ERAD is inhibited, which involves lysosomes. Our data provide insight in the cross-talk between proteolytic pathways involved in ER proteostasis. This has implications for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease where disturbed ER proteostasis and proteolytic impairment are early phenomena in the pathology.     

Endoplasmic reticulum proteostasis impairment in aging

Perturbed neuronal proteostasis is a salient feature shared by both aging and protein misfolding disorders. The proteostasis network controls the health of the proteome by integrating pathways involved in protein synthesis, folding, trafficking, secretion, and their degradation. A reduction in the buffering capacity of the proteostasis network during aging may increase the risk to undergo neurodegeneration by enhancing the accumulation of misfolded proteins. As almost one‐third of the proteome is synthetized at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), maintenance of its proper function is fundamental to sustain neuronal function. In fact, ER stress is a common feature of most neurodegenerative diseases. The unfolded protein response (UPR) operates as central player to maintain ER homeostasis or the induction of cell death of chronically damaged cells. Here, we discuss recent evidence placing ER stress as a driver of brain aging, and the emerging impact of neuronal UPR in controlling global proteostasis at the whole organismal level. Finally, we discuss possible therapeutic interventions to improve proteostasis and prevent pathological brain aging.     

Targeting of the unfolded protein response (UPR) as therapy for Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, leading to the progressive decline of motor control due to the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. At the molecular level, Parkinson's disease share common molecular signatures with most neurodegenerative diseases including the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the brain. Alteration in the buffering capacity of the proteostasis network during aging is proposed as one of the triggering steps leading to abnormal protein aggregation in this disease, highlighting disturbances in the function of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The ER is the main subcellular compartment involved in protein folding and quality control. ER stress triggers a signalling reaction known as the unfolded protein response (UPR), which aims restoring proteostasis through the induction of adaptive programs or the activation of cell death pathways when damage is chronic and cannot be repaired. Here, we overview most evidence linking ER stress to Parkinson's disease. Strategies to alleviate ER stress by targeting specific components of the UPR using small molecules and gene therapy are highlighted.     

Cross‐compartment proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance induced ER stress

Imbalance in protein homeostasis in specific subcellular organelles is alleviated through organelle‐specific stress response pathways. As a canonical example of stress activated pathway, accumulation of misfolded proteins in ER activates unfolded protein response (UPR) in almost all eukaryotic organisms. However, very little is known about the involvement of proteins of other organelles that help to maintain the cellular protein homeostasis during ER stress. In this study, using iTRAQ‐based LC–MS approach, we identified organelle enriched proteins that are differentially expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) during ER stress in the absence of UPR sensor Ire1p. We have identified about 750 proteins from enriched organelle fraction in three independent iTRAQ experiments. Induction of ER stress resulted in the differential expression of 93 proteins in WT strains, 40 of which were found to be dependent on IRE1. Our study reveals a cross‐talk between ER‐ and mitochondrial proteostasis exemplified by an Ire1p‐dependent induction of Hsp60p, a mitochondrial chaperone. Thus, in this study, we show changes in protein levels in various organelles in response to ER stress. A large fraction of these changes were dependent on canonical UPR signalling through Ire1, highlighting the importance of interorganellar cross‐talk during stress.     

RESETing ER proteostasis: selective stress pathway hidden in the secretory route

The efficient folding of membrane and secreted proteins relies on the unfolded protein response (UPR) to buffer fluctuations in the load of misfolded proteins. Although the UPR is thought to operate on a generic manner to maintain ER proteostasis, a recent study revealed the existence of a novel mechanism to eliminate misfolded GPI‐anchored proteins via the secretory pathway, termed ‘rapid ER stress‐induced export’ (RESET) (Satpute‐Krishnan et al, 2014 ). RESET involves the export of misfolded GPI proteins to the plasma membrane for subsequent degradation by the lysosome.     

The therapeutic effects of 4-phenylbutyric acid in maintaining proteostasis

Recently, there has been an increasing amount of literature published on the effects of 4-phenylbutyric acid (4-PBA) in various biological systems. 4-PBA is currently used clinically to treat urea cycle disorders under the trade name Buphenyl. Recent studies however have explored 4-PBA in the context of a low weight molecular weight chemical chaperone. Its properties as a chemical chaperone prevent misfolded protein aggregation and alleviate endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. As the ER is responsible for folding proteins targeted for use in membranes or secreted out of the cell, failure of maintaining adequate ER homeostasis may lead to protein misfolding and subsequent cell and organ pathology. Accumulation of misfolded proteins within the ER activates the unfolded protein response (UPR), a molecular repair response. The activation of the UPR aims to restore ER and cellular proteostasis by regulating the rate of synthesis of newly formed proteins as well as initiating molecular programs aimed to help fold or degrade misfolded proteins. If proteostasis is not restored, the UPR may initiate pro-apoptotic pathways. It is suggested that 4-PBA may help fold proteins in the ER, attenuating the activation of the UPR, and thus potentially alleviating various pathologies. This review discusses the biomedical research exploring the potential therapeutic effects of 4-PBA in various in vitro and in vivo model systems and clinical trials, while also commenting on the possible mechanisms of action.     

未折叠蛋白反应的信号转导

在内质网中,分泌性蛋白、跨膜蛋白和内质网驻留蛋白折叠成天然构象,经过修饰后,形成有活性的功能性蛋白质。如果蛋白质在内质网内的折叠受到抑制,造成未折叠蛋白聚集,将引起内质网应激。激活未折叠蛋白反应（unfolded protein response,UPR）,使蛋白质的生物合成减少,内质网的降解功能增强,从而降低内质网负担,维持细胞内的稳态。如果内质网应激持续存在,则可能诱发细胞凋亡。研究表明,未折叠蛋白反应能在多种肿瘤细胞中发生,并能促进肿瘤细胞的生长。本文对未折叠蛋白反应与肿瘤研究的最新进展进行综述。     

ER stress and the unfolded protein response

Conformational diseases are caused by mutations altering the folding pathway or final conformation of a protein. Many conformational diseases are caused by mutations in secretory proteins and reach from metabolic diseases, e.g. diabetes, to developmental and neurological diseases, e.g. Alzheimer's disease. Expression of mutant proteins disrupts protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), causes ER stress, and activates a signaling network called the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR increases the biosynthetic capacity of the secretory pathway through upregulation of ER chaperone and foldase expression. In addition, the UPR decreases the biosynthetic burden of the secretory pathway by downregulating expression of genes encoding secreted proteins. Here we review our current understanding of how an unfolded protein signal is generated, sensed, transmitted across the ER membrane, and how downstream events in this stress response are regulated. We propose a model in which the activity of UPR signaling pathways reflects the biosynthetic activity of the ER. We summarize data that shows that this information is integrated into control of cellular events, which were previously not considered to be under control of ER signaling pathways, e.g. execution of differentiation and starvation programs.     

High capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum to prevent secretion and aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins

Protein aggregation is associated with neurodegeneration and various other pathologies. How specific cellular environments modulate the aggregation of disease proteins is not well understood. Here, we investigated how the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control system handles β‐sheet proteins that were designed de novo to form amyloid‐like fibrils. While these proteins undergo toxic aggregation in the cytosol, we find that targeting them to the ER (ER‐β) strongly reduces their toxicity. ER‐β is retained within the ER in a soluble, polymeric state, despite reaching very high concentrations exceeding those of ER‐resident molecular chaperones. ER‐β is not removed by ER‐associated degradation (ERAD) but interferes with ERAD of other proteins. These findings demonstrate a remarkable capacity of the ER to prevent the formation of insoluble β‐aggregates and the secretion of potentially toxic protein species. Our results also suggest a generic mechanism by which proteins with exposed β‐sheet structure in the ER interfere with proteostasis.     

Proteostasis regulation at the endoplasmic reticulum: a new perturbation site for targeted cancer therapy

To deal with the constant challenge of protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), eukaryotic cells have evolved an ER protein quality control (ERQC) mechanism that is integrated with an adaptive stress response. The ERQC pathway is comprised of factors residing in the ER lumen that function in the identification and retention of aberrantly folded proteins, factors in the ER membrane for retrotranslocation of misfolded polypeptides, and enzymes in the cytosol that degrade retrotranslocated proteins. The integrated stress response (termed ER stress or unfolded protein response, UPR) contains several signaling branches elicited from the ER membrane, which fine-tune the rate of protein synthesis and entry into the ER to match the ER folding capacity. The fitness of the cell, particularly those bearing a high secretory burden, is critically dependent on functional integrity of the ER, which in turn relies on these stress-attenuating mechanisms to maintain protein homeostasis, or proteostasis. Aberrant proteostasis can trigger cellular apoptosis, making these adaptive stress response systems attractive targets for perturbation in treatment of cell malignancies. Here, we review our current understanding of how the cell preserves ER proteostasis and discuss how we may harness the mechanistic information on this process to develop new cancer therapeutics.     

The intrinsic chaperone network of Arabidopsis stem cells confers protection against proteotoxic stress

The biological purpose of plant stem cells is to maintain themselves while providing new pools of differentiated cells that form organs and rejuvenate or replace damaged tissues. Protein homeostasis or proteostasis is required for cell function and viability. However, the link between proteostasis and plant stem cell identity remains unknown. In contrast to their differentiated counterparts, we find that root stem cells can prevent the accumulation of aggregated proteins even under proteotoxic stress conditions such as heat stress or proteasome inhibition. Notably, root stem cells exhibit enhanced expression of distinct chaperones that maintain proteome integrity. Particularly, intrinsic high levels of the T‐complex protein‐1 ring complex/chaperonin containing TCP1 (TRiC/CCT) complex determine stem cell maintenance and their remarkable ability to suppress protein aggregation. Overexpression of CCT8, a key activator of TRiC/CCT assembly, is sufficient to ameliorate protein aggregation in differentiated cells and confer resistance to proteotoxic stress in plants. Taken together, our results indicate that enhanced proteostasis mechanisms in stem cells could be an important requirement for plants to persist under extreme environmental conditions and reach extreme long ages. Thus, proteostasis of stem cells can provide insights to design and breed plants tolerant to environmental challenges caused by the climate change.     

TRIM16 controls assembly and degradation of protein aggregates by modulating the p62‐NRF2 axis and autophagy

Sequestration of protein aggregates in inclusion bodies and their subsequent degradation prevents proteostasis imbalance, cytotoxicity, and proteinopathies. The underlying molecular mechanisms controlling the turnover of protein aggregates are mostly uncharacterized. Herein, we show that a TRIM family protein, TRIM16, governs the process of stress‐induced biogenesis and degradation of protein aggregates. TRIM16 facilitates protein aggregate formation by positively regulating the p62‐NRF2 axis. We show that TRIM16 is an integral part of the p62‐KEAP1‐NRF2 complex and utilizes multiple mechanisms for stabilizing NRF2. Under oxidative and proteotoxic stress conditions, TRIM16 activates ubiquitin pathway genes and p62 via NRF2, leading to ubiquitination of misfolded proteins and formation of protein aggregates. We further show that TRIM16 acts as a scaffold protein and, by interacting with p62, ULK1, ATG16L1, and LC3B, facilitates autophagic degradation of protein aggregates. Thus, TRIM16 streamlines the process of stress‐induced aggregate clearance and protects cells against oxidative/proteotoxic stress‐induced toxicity in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, this work identifies a new mechanism of protein aggregate turnover, which could be relevant in protein aggregation‐associated diseases such as neurodegeneration.