Prespore cell inducing factor, ψ factor,controls both prestalk and prespore gene expression in Dictyostelium development

Prespore cell‐inducing (psi, ψ) factor (PsiA), encoded by the psiA gene of Dictyostelium, is a secreted signal glycoprotein that induces prespore cell differentiation when added to monolayer cultures. In situ hybridization during normal development showed that the psiA gene is highly expressed in scattered cells at the mound stage and in prespore cells at the onset of culmination. The conventional prespore‐cell marker genes, cotC and pspA, were expressed normally in psiA^? and psiA overexpressing strains. Expressions of rnrB and cudA are repressed in the prestalk cells of a wild type slug to render prespore specific pattern. However, a promoter‐reporter fusion gene, rnrB:lacZ, showed an ectopic expression in the prestalk cells of the psiA^? strain while cudA(psp):lacZ did so in those of the psiA overexpressing strain. Overexpression of psiA delayed expression of the prestalk specific gene, ecmB, during development, while knocking out psiA promoted its expression. In addition, overexpression inhibited DIF‐1‐induced stalk formation in monolayer cultures. Together with the known prespore inducing activity, the results indicate that PsiA regulates both prespore and prestalk/stalk cell differentiation. These results indicate that PsiA is also involved in prestalk cell differentiation.     

New prestalk and prespore inducing signals in Dictyostelium

The differentiation-inducing signals (DIFs) currently known in Dictyostelium appear unable to account for the full diversity of cell types produced in development. To search for new signals, we analyzed the differentiation in monolayers of cells expressing prestalk (ecmAO, ecmA, ecmO, ecmB and cAR2) and prespore (psA) markers. Expression of each marker drops off as the cell density is reduced, suggesting that cell interaction is required. Expression of each marker is inhibited by cerulenin, an inhibitor of polyketide synthesis, and can be restored by conditioned medium. However, the known stalk-inducing polyketide, DIF-1, could not replace conditioned medium and induce the ecmA or cAR2 prestalk markers, suggesting that they require different polyketide inducers. Polyketide production by fungi is stimulated by cadmium ions, which also dramatically stimulates differentiation in Dictyostelium cell cultures and the accumulation of medium factors. Factors produced with cadmium present were extracted from conditioned medium and fractionated by HPLC. A new factor inducing prespore cell differentiation, called PSI-2, and two inducing stalk cell differentiation (DIFs 6 and 7) were resolved. All are distinct from currently identified factors. DIF-6, but not DIF-7 or PSI-2, appears to have an essential carbonyl group. Thus Dictyostelium may use extensive polyketide signaling in its development.     

Cross-induction of cell types in Dictyostelium: evidence that DIF-1 is made by prespore cells.

To investigate how cell type proportions are regulated during Dictyostelium development, we have attempted to find out which cell type produces DIF-1, a diffusible signal molecule inducing the differentiation of prestalk-O cells. DIF-1 is a chlorinated alkyl phenone that is synthesized from a C12 polyketide precursor by chlorination and methylation, with the final step catalysed by the dmtA methyltransferase. All our evidence points to the prespore cells as the major source of DIF-1. (1) dmtA mRNA and enzyme activity are greatly enriched in prespore compared with prestalk cells. The chlorinating activity is also somewhat prespore-enriched. (2) Expression of dmtA is induced by cyclic-AMP and this induction is inhibited by DIF-1. This regulatory behaviour is characteristic of prespore products. (3) Short-term labelling experiments, using the polyketide precursor, show that purified prespore cells produce DIF-1 at more than 20 times the rate of prestalk cells. (4) Although DIF-1 has little effect on its own synthesis in short-term labelling experiments, in long-term experiments, using 36Cl(-) as label, it is strongly inhibitory (IC(50) about 5 nM), presumably because it represses expression of dmtA; this is again consistent with DIF-1 production by prespore cells. Inhibition takes about 1 hour to become effective. We propose that prespore cells cross-induce the differentiation of prestalk-O cells by making DIF-1, and that this is one of the regulatory loops that sets the proportion of prespore-to-prestalk cells in the aggregate.     

A gene encoding, prespore-cell-inducing factor in Dictyostelium discoideum

Two factors that exist in conditioned medium (CM) of Dictyostelium discoideum induce amoebae to differentiate into prespore cells when they are incubated at a very low cell density in submerged monolayer culture. Previously, we purified one of them, a glycoprotein factor with an apparent molecular mass of 106 kDa, and we named it psi factor (psi, prespore-inducing factor). Based on the partial amino acid sequence of the purified psi factor, we have isolated the corresponding cDNA clone, which is expressed maximally at the loose mound stage. The cDNA encodes a novel protein and the predicted molecular mass of the mature secreted protein is 60 kDa. Knockout mutant strains of the psi factor gene, psiA(-), were created by targeted integration. Although these mutant strains appear to develop normally, CM from these mutants showed reduced prespore-cell-inducing activity. Rescuing the mutant strains by expression of psi factor under control of a constitutive promoter causes overproduction of psi factor protein and CM from such cells showed a 20-fold higher level of prespore-cell-inducing activity than that from wild-type cells. Further, CM from parental cells induced prespore cell division, while that from psiA null strains showed no cell division inducing activity. Our results indicate that psi factor protein is a novel type of growth factor that does not belong to any of the families of growth factor so far identified in animals.     

Three steps in prespore differentiationin Dictyostelium discoideum with different requirements of cellular interaction

Abstract. Extracellular cAMP and a secreted factors have been known to be involved in prespore differentiation of Dictyostelium discoideum . Here we show that cAMP, a secreted factor(s) and some other interactions are required for prespore differentiation and that they work in completely different periods; a secreted factor(s) and other interactions are required only in the stages earlier than the cAMP-dependent stage. According to the results the process of prespore differentiation can be dissected into three sequential stages, stage I, II and III. The processes in stage I and II depend on high cell density. The requirement for high cell density in stage II could be replaced with a secreted factor(s) in conditioned medium, whereas it could not in stage I. The factor(s) in conditioned medium does not appear to be cAMP, ammonia, or methionine. In contrast to these two stages, the process in stage III, the last stage, proceeds even at low cell density if cAMP is supplied, where other interactions would be negligible. Therefore cells that have proceeded to the end of stage II are considered to have acquired a competence to differentiate to prespore cells without further cellular interactions other than cAMP.
cAMP pulses are not essential for the processes of any stage of prespore differentiation, since they proceed in the presence of caffeine, an inhibitor of cAMP pulse production, or in a mutant strain (Frigid A) which is deficient in cAMP relay systems.     

Control of cell type proportions by a secreted factor in Dictyostelium discoideum

It has been shown that, in Dictyostelium discoideum, conversion of prestalk cells to prespore cells in suspension cultures is inhibited by coexisting prespore cells. To examine whether the inhibition of conversion requires direct cell contact or is mediated by substances secreted by the cells, prestalk cells and prespore cells were incubated in shaken suspension, separated from each other by a dialysis membrane, and conversion of the prestalk cells to prespore cells scored after 24 h. Prestalk-to-prespore conversion was significantly inhibited if the density of the prespore cells was sufficiently high. In contrast, prestalk cells had little influence on prestalk-to-prespore conversion. Media conditioned by prespore cells, but not by prestalk cells, also inhibited the conversion of prestalk cells. Adenosine, propionate, diethylstilboestrol and differentiation inducing factor (DIF), all of which are known to influence the prestalk/prespore differentiation, were examined for their effects on prestalk-to-prespore conversion. Among these, all except adenosine significantly inhibited the conversion. Based on these results, possible mechanisms for maintenance of the constant cell-type ratio in D. discoideum slugs were discussed.     

A secreted factor and cyclic AMP jointly regulate cell-type-specific gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum.

We are studying cell differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum by examining the regulation of genes that are preferentially expressed in different cell types. A system has been established in which prestalk- and prespore-cell-specific genes are expressed in single cells in response to culture conditions. We confirm our previous results showing that cyclic AMP induces prestalk genes and now show that it is also required for prespore gene induction. The expression of both classes of genes is additionally dependent on the presence of a factor(s) secreted by developing cells which we call conditioned medium factor(s). An assay for conditioned medium factor(s) shows that it is detectable within 2.5 h after the onset of development. Conditioned medium factor(s) also promotes the expression of genes induced early in development, but has no detectable effect on the expression of actin genes and a gene expressed maximally in vegetative cells. In the presence of conditioned medium factor(s), exogenous cyclic AMP at the onset of starvation fails to induce the prespore and prestalk genes. The addition of cyclic AMP between 2 and 12 h of starvation results in rapid prestalk gene expression, whereas prespore genes are induced at an invarient time (approximately 18 h after the onset of starvation). These data suggest that cyclic AMP and conditioned medium factor(s) are sufficient for prestalk gene induction, whereas an additional parameter(s) is involved in the control of prespore gene induction. In contrast to several previous studies, we show that multicellularity is not essential for the expression of either prespore or prestalk genes. These data indicate that prespore and prestalk genes have cell-type-specific as well as shared regulatory factors.     

DIF-Resistant Expression of a Prespore-Specific Gene in Dictyostelium in Vitro Development

In submerged culture, the prespore-specific gene, D19, of Dictyostelium discoideum was found to be expressed in the early stages of development, even in the presence of 1 nM of DIF-1 (stalk differentiation inducing factor). This concentration of DIF-1 later caused the degradation of the previously accumulated D19 mRNA concomitant with the induction of the prestalk-specific genes ecmA/ecmB and eventually 85% of cells differentiated into stalk cells. These results suggest that prespore differentiation occurs at least transiently even in the presence of DIF-1.     

Participation of multiple factors, including proliferin, in the inhibition of myogenic differentiation.

Proliferin (PLF) is a secreted glycoprotein in the prolactin-growth hormone family in mice. PLF expression was detected in C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts, but not in two 10T1/2-derived myogenic cell lines, and was restored in two nondifferentiating variants of one of these myogenic cell lines. Transient expression of one form of PLF (PLF1) inhibited expression from a muscle-specific gene promoter; a second form of PLF, which differed at three amino acid residues, displayed no activity in this transient assay. Introduction of a PLF1 expression construct into both muscle- and 10T1/2-derived myoblasts resulted in cell lines that were no longer myogenic or that differentiated only partially. Analysis of these cell lines revealed that differentiation could be obstructed at several steps and by one or more factors in addition to PLF. Although expected to function in vivo as an extracellular hormone, PLF did not appear to be acting through a cell surface receptor to inhibit differentiation in these cultured myoblasts.     

Epidermal growth factor and three‐dimensional scaffolds provide conducive environment for differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into oocyte‐like cells

Three‐dimensional (3D) culture provides a biomimicry of the naive microenvironment that can support cell proliferation, differentiation, and regeneration. Some growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), facilitate normal meiosis during oocyte maturation in vivo. In this study, a scaffold‐based 3D coculture system using purified alginate was applied to induce oocyte differentiation from mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). mESCs were induced to differentiate into oocyte‐like cells using embryoid body protocol in the two‐dimensional or 3D microenvironment in vitro. To increase the efficiency of the oocyte‐like cell differentiation from mESCs, we employed a coculture system using ovarian granulosa cells in the presence or absence of epidermal growth factor (+EGF or ?EGF) for 14 days and then the cells were assessed for germ cell differentiation, meiotic progression, and oocyte maturation markers. The cultures exposed to EGF in the alginate‐based 3D microenvironment showed the highest level of premeiotic (Oct4 and Mvh), meiotic (Scp1, Scp3, Stra8, and Rec8), and oocyte maturation (Gdf9, Cx37, and Zp2) marker genes (p < .05) in comparison to other groups. According to the gene‐expression patterns, we can conclude that alginate‐based 3D coculture system provided a highly efficient protocol for oocyte‐like cell differentiation from mESCs. The data showed that this culture system along with EGF improved the rate of in vitro oocyte‐like cell differentiation.     

Evidence that positional information is used to establish the prestalk-prespore pattern in Dictyostelium discoideum aggregates

Two contrasting mechanisms have been proposed for the establishment of the prestalk-prespore pattern in the multicellular aggregate of the simple eukaryote Dictyostelium discoideum. One involves intermingled, non-position-dependent cell differentiation followed by sorting out which produces the pattern of prestalk cells in the anterior region and prespore cells posteriorly. The second mechanism involves patterning according to the position of cells within the aggregate, in which case intermingled cell types are not expected. Here we use a monoclonal antibody (MUD1), recognising a prespore cell surface antigen, to study the initial appearance of prespore cells in aggregates. Quantitative studies were made with a flow cytometer and frozen sections were used to localise the cells expressing the prespore antigen. This antigen first appeared at the onset of tip formation in the centre of aggregates in a position-dependent fashion. The prespore antigen was not detected in the tip region or in streams of cells entering the aggregate. We re-examined the evidence on which the non-position-dependent differentiation model is based. Our results support the positional model for pattern formation.     

A mesoderm-inducing factor from a Xenopus laevis cell line

Summary We have compared the chemical properties and biological activities of the mesoderm-inducing factor that is secreted by the Xenopus XTC cell line with the vegetalizing factor from chicken embryos. The inducing activity of the factors was tested in different concentrations on totipotent ectoderm either by implantation into early gastrulae of Triturm alpestris or by application of solutions to isolated ectoderm of early gastrulae of Xenopus laevis. Both factors have similar properties. They are not irreversibly inactivated after treatment with 6 M urea or with phenol at 60° C. Reduction with thioglycolic acid inactivates the factors completely. The inducing activity of XTC-conditioned medium decreases only slightly after treatment with 50% formic acid. The apparent molecular mass and the isoelectric point of the factors are similar. The XTC factor was partially purified by size-exclusion and reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography and by isoelectric focusing. The possible relationship of these factors to transforming growth factor is discussed.Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Sulo Toivonen on the occasion of his 80th birthday     

Dickeya dadantii pectic enzymes necessary for virulence are also responsible for activation of the Arabidopsis thaliana innate immune system

Soft‐rot diseases of plants attributed to Dickeya dadantii result from lysis of the plant cell wall caused by pectic enzymes released by the bacterial cell by a type II secretion system (T2SS). Arabidopsis thaliana can express several lines of defence against this bacterium. We employed bacterial mutants with defective envelope structures or secreted proteins to examine early plant defence reactions. We focused on the production of AtrbohD‐dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose deposition and cell death as indicators of these reactions. We observed a significant reduction in ROS and callose formation with a bacterial mutant in which genes encoding five pectate lyases (Pels) were disrupted. Treatment of plant leaves with bacterial culture filtrates containing Pels resulted in ROS and callose production, and both reactions were dependent on a functional AtrbohD gene. ROS and callose were produced in response to treatment with a cellular fraction of a T2SS‐negative mutant grown in a Pels‐inducing medium. Finally, ROS and callose were produced in leaves treated with purified Pels that had also been shown to induce the expression of jasmonic acid‐dependent defence genes. Pel catalytic activity is required for the induction of ROS accumulation. In contrast, cell death observed in leaves infected with the wild‐type strain appeared to be independent of a functional AtrbohD gene. It was also independent of the bacterial production of pectic enzymes and the type III secretion system (T3SS). In conclusion, the work presented here shows that D. dadantii is recognized by the A. thaliana innate immune system through the action of pectic enzymes secreted by bacteria at the site of infection. This recognition leads to AtrbohD‐dependent ROS and callose accumulation, but not cell death.     

Glycoantigen expression is regulated both temporally and spatially during development in the cellular slime molds Dictyostelium discoideum and D. mucoroides

Six monoclonal antibodies were isolated which react with common antigens shared by multiple glycoconjugate species in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Based on competition of antibody binding by glycopeptides and simple sugars, and inhibition of antibody binding by antigen pretreatment with Na periodate, it is argued that at least five of the six antibodies recognize epitopes which contain carbohydrate. These epitopes are consequently referred to as glycoantigens (GAs).Three of the GAs are expressed during growth and throughout the developmental cycle, but are eventually enriched in prestalk and stalk cells. The remaining three are expressed only during and/or after aggregation and are exclusively expressed or highly enriched in prespore cells and spores. These conclusions are derived from Western blot immunoanalysis of purified cell types, immunofluorescence, and EM immunocytochemistry.The two GAs found only in prespore cells appear to be exclusively enclosed within prespore vesicles. The third GA of this type, which is only enriched in prespore cells compared to prestalk cells, is also found in other vesicle types as well as on the cell surface.Two of the GAs enriched in prestalk cells are initially found in all cells of the slug. They are undetectable in spores and prominent in stalk cells. The third GA, though found in the interiors of both prestalk and prespore cells, is enriched on the cell surface of prestalk cells.The chief characteristics of expression of four of these GAs are conserved in the related species D. mucoroides. This species is characterized by continuous trans differentiation of prespore cells into prestalk cells. This shows that the prespore cells maintain specific mechanisms for turning over their cell type specific GAs and that prestalk cells express a specific mechanism for inducing at least one of their cell-type specific GAs.These observations identify specific carbohydrate structures (as GAs) whose synthesis, subsequent localization and turnover are developmentally regulated. The exclusive association of two GAs with prespore vesicles identifies these GAs as markers for this organelle and raises questions regarding the functional significance of this association. The restricted cell surface localization of the other four GAs, together with data from cell adhesion studies, suggest the possibility of a potential role for these GAs in intercellular recognition leading to cell sorting.This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Daniel McMahon.     

Interleukin‐6 downregulation with mesenchymal stem cell differentiation results in loss of immunoprivilege

Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation improves cardiac function, but cellular differentiation results in loss of immunoprivilege and rejection. To explore the mechanism involved in this immune rejection, we investigated the influence of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), a factor secreted by MSCs, on immune privilege after myogenic, endothelial and smooth muscle cell differentiation induced by 5‐azacytidine, VEGF, and transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β), respectively. Both RT‐PCR and ELISA showed that myogenic differentiation of MSCs was associated with significant downregulation of IL‐6 expression (P < 0.01), which was also observed following endothelial (P < 0.01) and smooth muscle cell differentiation (P < 0.05), indicating that IL‐6 downregulation was dependent on differentiation but not cell phenotype. Flow cytometry demonstrated that IL‐6 downregulation as a result of myogenic differentiation was associated with increased leucocyte‐mediated cell death in an allogeneic leucocyte co‐culture study (P < 0.01). The allogeneic reactivity associated with IL‐6 downregulation was also observed following MSC differentiation to endothelial and smooth muscle cells (P < 0.01), demonstrating that leucocyte‐mediated cytotoxicity was also dependent on differentiation but not cell phenotype. Restoration of IL‐6 partially rescued the differentiated cells from leucocyte‐mediated cell death. These findings suggest that rejection of allogeneic MSCs after implantation may be because of a reduction in cellular IL‐6 levels, and restoration of IL‐6 may be a new target to retain MSC immunoprivilege.     

A secreted 80 x 10(3) Mr protein mediates sensing of cell density and the onset of development in Dictyostelium.

In submerged monolayer culture, Dictyostelium cells can differentiate into prespore and prestalk cells at high cell densities in response to cAMP but not at low cell densities. However, cells at low densities will differentiate in medium taken from developing cells starved at a high density. The putative factor in the medium was designated CMF for conditioned medium factor (Mehdy and Firtel, Molec. cell. Biology 5, 705-713, 1985). In this report, we size-fractionate conditioned medium and show that the activity that allows low density cells to differentiate can be separated into high and low Mr (relative molecular mass) fractions. Interestingly, the two fractions both have the same activity and do not need to be combined to allow differentiation. The large conditioned medium factor is a protein, as determined by trypsin sensitivity, that can be purified to a single 80 x 10(3) Mr band on a silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and has CMF activity at a concentration of approximately 4 pM (0.3 ng ml-1). Our results suggest that CMF is a secreted factor that functions in vivo as an indicator of cell density in starved cells. At high cell densities, the concentration of CMF is sufficient to enable cells to enter the multicellular stage of the developmental cycle. When present below a threshold concentration, cells do not initiate the expression of genes required for early development. This factor plays an essential role in the regulatory pathway necessary for cells to obtain the developmental competence to induce prestalk and prespore gene expression in response to cAMP.     

Granulocyte‐Macrophage Colony‐Stimulating Factor (GM‐CSF) Controls the Proliferation and Differentiation of Mouse Epidermal Melanocytes from Pigmented Spots Induced by Ultraviolet Radiation B

Repeated exposure of ultraviolet radiation B (UVB) on the dorsal skin of hairless mice induces the development of pigmented spots long after its cessation. The proliferation and differentiation of epidermal melanocytes in UVB‐induced pigmented spots are greatly increased, and those effects are regulated by keratinocytes rather than by melanocytes. However, it remains to be resolved what factor(s) derived from keratinocytes are involved in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of epidermal melanocytes. In this study, primary melanoblasts (c. 80%) and melanocytes (c. 20%) derived from epidermal cell suspensions of mouse skin were cultured in a basic fibroblast growth factor‐free medium supplemented with granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF). GM‐CSF induced the proliferation and differentiation of melanocytes in those keratinocyte‐depleted cultures. Moreover, an antibody to GM‐CSF inhibited the proliferation of melanoblasts and melanocytes from epidermal cell suspensions derived from the pigmented spots of UV‐irradiated mice, but not from control mice. Further, the GM‐CSF antibody inhibited the proliferation and differentiation of melanocytes co‐cultured with keratinocytes derived from UV‐irradiated mice, but not from control mice. The quantity of GM‐CSF secreted from keratinocytes derived from the pigmented spots of UV‐irradiated mice was much greater than that secreted from keratinocytes derived from control mice. Moreover, immunohistochemistry revealed the expression of GM‐CSF in keratinocytes derived from the pigmented spots of skin in UV‐irradiated mice, but not from normal skin in control mice. These results suggest that GM‐CSF is one of the keratinocyte‐derived factors involved in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of mouse epidermal melanocytes from UVB‐induced pigmented spots.