不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的临床研究

目的:观察标准治疗基础上联合不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的疗效及安全性。方法:2004年9月至2008年3月就诊我院的124例12小时以内发病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,随机分为3组,3组均在入院后前3天给予阿司匹林300mg/d,此后给予阿司匹林100mg/d,A组常规不给予氯吡格雷治疗,B组给予氯吡格雷75mg/d,C组入院即刻给予氯吡格雷300mg,继之75 mg/d治疗,随访30天。观察溶栓血管再通率、梗死后心绞痛发作、心力衰竭事件及死亡、再发心肌梗死、或脑卒中的联合终点。结果:与A组相比,B组、C组患者溶栓成功率提高、梗死后心绞痛发作减少。P<0.05:进一步分析发现C组与B组差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。三组均无主要和次要出血事件发生,轻微出血发生率无统计学差异,P<0.05。结论:ST段抬高的急性心肌梗死患者在标准治疗的基础上早期加用氯吡格雷75 mg/d或先予300 mg负荷量,继之75 mg/d口服,均可提高溶栓成功率,降低梗死后心绞痛发生,而氯吡格雷负荷剂量组并不优于普通剂量组,且两组安全耐受性好。     

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性ST段抬高性心肌梗死患者临床疗效的对比研究

目的:探讨替格瑞洛治疗急性ST段抬高性心肌梗死(STEMI)的有效性及安全性。方法:收集西京医院心内科收治的STEMI患者196例并将其分为氯吡格雷组(n=100)和替格瑞洛组(n=96)。两组患者入院后均接受常规治疗,氯吡格雷组给予氯吡格雷负荷剂量300 mg,PCI术后给予氯吡格雷标准剂量(75 mg,1/日,口服)治疗;替格瑞洛组给予180 mg负荷剂量,PCI术后给予替格瑞洛标准剂量(90 mg,2/日,口服)治疗。于患者出院后1月、3月、6月进行随访,观察和比较两组患者不良终点事件及出血事件发生情况的差异。结果:两组患者一般情况、危险因素、临床用药及其他治疗情况比较均无统计学差异(P0.05)。两组6个月主要及次要终点事件、主要及次要出血事件的发生情况比较无显著差异(P0.05)。结论:替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对STEMI患者近中期不良终点事件的影响相当。     

不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST 段抬高心肌梗死的疗效及安全性分析

目的:探讨不同剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性ST段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)的疗效及安全性。方法:178例急性STEMI患者随机分为高剂量组和常规剂量组,每组各69例。两组均给予阿司匹林、静脉溶栓、抗凝及降脂等常规治疗,高剂量组和常规剂量组分别口服氯吡格雷负荷量600 mg、300 mg,之后两组患者给予维持量75 mg/d。结果:治疗30 d后,高剂量组总有效率为91.0%,常规剂量组为77.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高剂量组治疗后36 h及30d的MACE发生率为3.4%和6.7%,常规剂量组为12.4%和18.0%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组出血发生率分别为9.0%,5.6%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:高剂量(600 mg)氯吡格雷治疗急性STEMI疗效优于常规剂量(300 mg),且具有良好的安全性。     

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性心肌梗死患者介入治疗后的心功能和炎症反应的影响

目的:探讨替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对急性心肌梗死患者介入治疗后的心功能和炎症反应的影响。方法:选取2015年1月-2018年1月期间我院收治的行介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者300例为研究对象。根据随机数字表法将患者分为替格瑞洛组(n=150)和氯吡格雷组(n=150),其中替格瑞洛组给予阿司匹林、替格瑞洛治疗,氯吡格雷组给予阿司匹林、氯吡格雷治疗。比较两组患者治疗前后的左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDd)及白介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、可溶性CD40配体(s CD40L)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平,随访3个月,观察两组患者随访期间心血管不良事件的发生情况。结果:两组患者治疗后LVEF较治疗前升高,且替格瑞洛组高于氯吡格雷组,LVEDd较治疗前降低,且替格瑞洛组低于氯吡格雷组(P0.05)。两组患者治疗后IL-6、CRP、s CD40L、TNF-α均较治疗前升高,但替格瑞洛组低于氯吡格雷组(P0.05)。替格瑞洛组随访期间心血管不良事件总发生率为10.00%(15/150),显著低于氯吡格雷组患者的31.33%(47/150),组间比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:相较于氯吡格雷而言,替格瑞洛治疗行介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者效果满意,可显著改善心功能,降低炎症因子水平及心血管不良事件发生率。     

通心络对急性心肌梗死保守治疗患者疗效观察

目的:观察通心络胶囊对急性心肌梗死(AMI)未接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或溶栓治疗后患者的疗效。方法:对我院收治的ST段抬高未实施PCI或溶栓治疗的AMI患者,随机分为常规药物治疗作为对照组(20例)和同时加服用通心络胶囊的治疗组(20例)。于发病后一月内观察再发心绞痛、急性心血管事件、左室射血分数(LVEF)改变。结果:通心络组心功能改善较对照组明显,通心络组再发心绞痛及急性心血管事件较对照组明显减少。结论:通心络对急性心肌梗死保守治疗患者不仅减少心绞痛发作及急性心血管事件的发生而且可改善心功能。     

静脉溶栓时机对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者溶栓效果及主要不良心脏事件发生率的影响

目的:探讨静脉溶栓时机对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者溶栓效果及主要不良心脏事件发生率的影响。方法:将2016年1月至2017年12月我院接诊的314例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者纳入本研究,按照溶栓治疗时间不同分为A组(发病至溶栓时间6 h)172例、B组(发病至溶栓时间为6～12 h)102例和C组(发病至溶栓时间12 h)40例,比较三组患者溶栓效果、溶栓后ST段回落情况以及住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生情况。结果:A组患者梗死冠脉溶通率、溶栓后ST段回落幅度高于B组和C组,且B组高于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。A组患者治疗后ST段回落最大幅度所需时间、住院期间主要不良心脏事件总发生率低于B组和C组,且B组低于C组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者发病后6 h内静脉溶栓治疗梗死冠脉溶通率更高、ST段回落效果更好,可降低住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生风险。     

瑞替普酶溶栓治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死80例临床分析

目的:观察瑞替普酶溶栓治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的临床效果。方法:80例急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者随机分为A组和B组,A组采用尿激酶溶栓治疗,B组采用瑞替普酶溶栓治疗。比较两组血管再通率,出血等并发症发生率。结果:B组溶栓治疗60分钟、90分钟、120分钟血管再通率显著高于A组(P0.05);两组并发症发生率、死亡率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 :采用瑞替普酶溶栓治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死,临床效果优于尿激酶,安全性良好。     

CYP2C19 基因多态性与冠心病危险因素对氯吡格雷抵抗的影响

目的:观察细胞色素P450系统药物代谢酶CYP2C19基因多态性以及相关临床因素对氯吡格雷抵抗的影响。方法:选择2010年11月至2011年5月我科拟行PCI术治疗的冠心病患者共145例,均给予氯吡格雷300mg负荷剂量,75mg维持剂量。①通过流式细胞仪检测血管舒张因子刺激酸磷蛋白血小板反应性指数VASP PRI(以VASP PRI≥50%,定义为氯吡格雷抵抗)分为氯吡格雷抵抗组和氯吡格雷反应组。②检测入选患者的药物代谢酶CYP2C19的基因型;根据不同等位基因功能缺失,分为快代谢基因型(*1/*1)、中间代谢基因型(*1/*2、*1/*3)和慢代谢基因型(*2/*2、*2/*3、*3/*3)。③观察CYP2C19基因型及相关临床危险因素对氯吡格雷反应性的影响,④观察氯吡格雷抵抗与临床不良终点事件主要临床不良终点事件[心源性死亡、再发心肌梗死、靶病变再次血运重建术(TLR)]和次要临床终点事件(支架内血栓形成、脑血管意外、大出血)之间的相关性。结果:检测出氯吡格雷抵抗的患者31例,其发生率为20.67%;检测出CYP2C19慢代谢基因型携带患者19例,所占比例为12.67%。慢代谢基因型患者与(快代谢基因型+中间代谢基因型患者)之间VASP PRI比为(49.20±8.45)%VS(44.17±5.41)%,P<0.05,氯吡格雷抵抗发生率之比为35.49%(n=11)VS16.81%(n=20),P<0.05。多元回归分析提示CYP2C19慢代谢基因型(OR:4.43;95%CI:3.28-8.37,P<0.05)和2型糖尿病(OR:2.76;95%CI:2.13-6.14;P<0.05)是氯吡格雷抵抗的两种危险因素。临床随访结果显示氯吡格雷抵抗组与氯吡格雷反应组主要临床不良终点事件的发生率比为6.45%(n=2)vs2.63%(n=3),P<0.05。结论:携带CPY2C19慢代谢基因型和患有2型糖尿病是导致氯吡格雷抵抗的两种重要的危险因素,氯吡格雷抵抗的发生增加了临床不良终点事件的风险。     

高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合 征患者经皮冠状动脉介入中的应用

目的：探讨高负荷剂量氯吡格雷联合替罗非班在高危非ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征（acute coronary syndrome,ACS） 患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）中的作用及安全性。方法：入选208 例高危非ST 段抬高型 ACS患者,根据PCI术前氯吡格雷负荷量不同,随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组：112 例,以氯吡格雷300 mg+ 替罗非班(用法同 观察组)治疗,观察组：96例,以氯吡格雷600 mg +替罗非班0.4 滋g/(kg·min)在30 min 内静脉注射。继以0.1 g/(kg·min)由微量泵 静脉持续泵入至手术后36 h,分别测定两组最大血小板聚集率(MPAR)变化、PCI 术后TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG);随访住院期间 和30 d内不良心血管事件和出血事件。结果：两组临床情况、PCI前负荷剂量氯吡格雷给药时间、支架置入数目比较差异无统计 学意义(P>0.05);用药后2 h、6 h、术后24 h两组MPAR均较用药前明显降低(P<0.05);用药后6 h两组MPAR 均低于用药后2 h (P<0.05);用药后2 h时观察组MPAR 低于对照组(P<0.05)。PCI术后TMPG 3级获得率观察组高于对照组(P<0.05);30 d内复合心 血管事件发生率、出血并发症两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论：PCI术前负荷氯吡格雷600 mg可以更有效、更迅速地 抑制患者的MPAR,联合应用替罗非班时仍可改善心肌灌注,且安全可行。     

血栓抽吸联合PCI术前阿托伐他汀强化治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死

目的:探讨急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中应用GOODMAN血栓抽吸装置联合术前阿托伐他汀强化治疗对心肌组织灌注及临床预后的影响.方法:选择梗死相关血管心肌梗死溶栓试验血流0级的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者80例,随机分为血栓抽吸联PCI术前阿托伐他汀强化治疗组(试验组)40例和标准PCI治疗组(对照组)40例.比较两组患者术后心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)血流分级、TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG)、心电图ST段回落百分比、左心室射血分数(LVEF)及住院期间主要心血管不良事件(MACE).结果:试验组TIMI血流分级、TMPG、ST段回落百分比、LVEF均明显优于对照组(P＜0.05).两组患者住院期间MACE发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论:在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中应用血栓抽吸联合术前阿托伐他汀强化治疗安全可行,可有效清除冠状动脉内血栓,改善心肌组织灌注及术后心脏功能,并且不增加主要心血管事件的发生率.     

替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后的应用价值

目的:评价替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术后的应用价值。方法:将我院收治的565例成功行PCI的急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者随机分为2组:氯吡格雷组253例,术后口服氯吡格雷75 mg、QD;替格瑞洛组312例,术后口服替格瑞洛首剂180 mg,维持量90mg、BID。两组患者术后常规口服阿司匹林100 mg、QD。研究主要终点为主要不良心血管事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE),包括全因死亡、靶血管血运重建和脑梗塞;次要终点为TIMI主要出血(定义为血红蛋白下降50 g/L或颅内出血有关的临床显著出血事件)。结果:565例患者平均随访12个月,替格瑞洛组MACE发生率低于氯吡格雷组(3.8%vs.8.7%,P0.05),两组TIMI主要出血事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(2.9%vs.3.2%,P0.05)。结论:替格瑞洛能明显减少PCI术后主要不良心血管事件,并不增加主要出血。     

Does glycoprotein IIB/IIIA resistance exist?

Platelet function testing is not embedded into routine clinical practice, because no optimal, easy, reproducible and multipathway platelet aggregation test can be accomplished in vitro. Only recently, the relationship between the level of platelet aggregation inhibition by platelet inhibitors and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction became more clear.1-5 High platelet reactivity was found in patients who experienced stent thrombosis, and patients with clopidogrel resistance were at increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events.1,2 Furthermore, in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) increased levels of platelet aggregation were found compared with unstable angina or control patients.4 In a thrombolysis study, higher platelet receptor occupancy was coupled with better angiographic and electrocardiographic outcome.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with aspirin resistance following coronary artery bypass grafting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [NCT01159639

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease remains the dominant cause of mortality in developed countries. While platelets have been recognized to play a pivotal role in atherothrombosis, the ideal antiplatelet regime after coronary artery surgery remains elusive.The evolution of CABG has presently moved beyond technical improvements to involve modulation of pharmacologic management designed to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this trial will be to test the hypothesis that the addition of clopidogrel to patients with documented postoperative aspirin resistance will reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events. METHODS: Patients scheduled for isolated coronary artery surgery will be eligible for the study. Patients in whom postoperative multiple electrode aggregometry documents aspirin resistance will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive 300 mg of aspirin. The dual antiplatelet group will receive 75 mg of clopidogrel in addition to 300 mg of aspirin. Patients will be followed for 6 months. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization due to cardiovascular pathology) as well as bleeding events will be recorded. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial that will specifically address the issue of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery who have been found to be aspirin resistant. In the event that the addition of clopidogrel proves to be beneficial in this subset of surgical patients, this study could significantly impact their future antiplatelet management.This randomized controlled trial has been registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov website (Identifier NCT01159639).     

Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients

ObjectiveTo determine the effects of antiplatelet therapy among patients at high risk of occlusive vascular events.DesignCollaborative meta-analyses (systematic overviews).ResultsOverall, among these high risk patients, allocation to antiplatelet therapy reduced the combined outcome of any serious vascular event by about one quarter; non-fatal myocardial infarction was reduced by one third, non-fatal stroke by one quarter, and vascular mortality by one sixth (with no apparent adverse effect on other deaths). Absolute reductions in the risk of having a serious vascular event were 36 (SE 5) per 1000 treated for two years among patients with previous myocardial infarction; 38 (5) per 1000 patients treated for one month among patients with acute myocardial infarction; 36 (6) per 1000 treated for two years among those with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; 9 (3) per 1000 treated for three weeks among those with acute stroke; and 22 (3) per 1000 treated for two years among other high risk patients (with separately significant results for those with stable angina (P=0.0005), peripheral arterial disease (P=0.004), and atrial fibrillation (P=0.01)). In each of these high risk categories, the absolute benefits substantially outweighed the absolute risks of major extracranial bleeding. Aspirin was the most widely studied antiplatelet drug, with doses of 75-150 mg daily at least as effective as higher daily doses. The effects of doses lower than 75 mg daily were less certain. Clopidogrel reduced serious vascular events by 10% (4%) compared with aspirin, which was similar to the 12% (7%) reduction observed with its analogue ticlopidine. Addition of dipyridamole to aspirin produced no significant further reduction in vascular events compared with aspirin alone. Among patients at high risk of immediate coronary occlusion, short term addition of an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevented a further 20 (4) vascular events per 1000 (P<0.0001) but caused 23 major (but rarely fatal) extracranial bleeds per 1000.ConclusionsAspirin (or another oral antiplatelet drug) is protective in most types of patient at increased risk of occlusive vascular events, including those with an acute myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke, unstable or stable angina, previous myocardial infarction, stroke or cerebral ischaemia, peripheral arterial disease, or atrial fibrillation. Low dose aspirin (75-150 mg daily) is an effective antiplatelet regimen for long term use, but in acute settings an initial loading dose of at least 150 mg aspirin may be required. Adding a second antiplatelet drug to aspirin may produce additional benefits in some clinical circumstances, but more research into this strategy is needed.

What is already known on this topic

Antiplatelet therapy is effective for short term treatment of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and unstable anginaLong term treatment is beneficial for patients who have had a myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischaemic attackDaily aspirin doses of 75-325 mg are effective

What this study adds

Antiplatelet therapy protects against vascular events among patients with stable angina, intermittent claudication, and (if oral anticoagulants are unsuitable) atrial fibrillationAntiplatelet therapy can be started promptly during acute presumed ischaemic stroke and continued long termDaily aspirin doses of 75-150 mg seem to be as effective as higher doses for long term treatments (and clopidrogel is an appropriate alternative for patients with a contraindication to aspirin)Short term addition of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist to aspirin prevents vascular events in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention and those with unstable angina but causes increased bleeding     

Value of thallium-201 imaging in detecting adverse cardiac events after myocardial infarction and thrombolysis: a follow up of 100 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic role of thallium-201 imaging compared with that of exercise electrocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. DESIGN: Patients who remained free of adverse cardiac events six weeks after myocardial infarction had stress and rest 201TI imaging and exercise electrocardiography and were followed up for 8-32 months. Adverse cardiac events (death, reinfarction, unstable angina, and congestive heart failure) were documented. SETTING: Large district general hospital, Middlesex. SUBJECTS: 100 consecutive male and female patients who were stable six weeks after thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of occurrence of adverse cardiac events after myocardial infarction by exercise cardiography and 201TI myocardial perfusion imaging. RESULTS: Reversible ischaemia on 201TI imaging predicted adverse cardiac events in 33 out of 37 patients with such events during follow up (hazard ratio 8.1 (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 23.8), P < 0.001). Exercise electrocardiography showed reversible ischaemia in 33 patients, of whom 13 had subsequent events, and failed to predict events in 24 patients (hazard ratio 1.1 (0.56 to 2.2), P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: 201TI imaging is a sensitive predictor of subsequent adverse cardiac events in patients who have received thrombolysis after acute myocardial infarction, whereas exercise electrocardiography fails to predict outcome.     

A comparison of aspirin and anticoagulation following thrombolysis for myocardial infarction (the AFTER study): a multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare aspirin with anticoagulation with regard to risk of cardiac death and reinfarction in patients who received anistreplase thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A multicentre unblinded randomised clinical trial. SETTING: 38 hospitals in six countries. SUBJECTS: 1036 patients who had been treated with anistreplase for myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to either aspirin (150 mg daily) or anticoagulation (intravenous heparin followed by warfarin or other oral anticoagulant). The trial was stopped earlier than originally intended because of the slowing rate of recruitment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cardiac death or recurrent myocardial infarction at 30 days. RESULTS: After 30 days cardiac death or reinfarction, occurred in 11.0% (57/517) of the patients treated with anticoagulation and 11.2% (58/519) of the patients treated with aspirin (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.50, P = 0.92). Corresponding findings at three months were 13.2% (68/517) and 12.1% (63/519) (0.91, 0.63 to 1.32, P = 0.67). Patients receiving anticoagulation were more likely than patients receiving aspirin to have had severe bleeding or a stroke by three months (3.9% v 1.7% (0.44, 0.20 to 0.97, P = 0.04)). CONCLUSION: No evidence of a difference in the incidence of cardiac events was found between the two treatment groups, though the trial is too small to claim treatment equivalence confidently. A higher incidence of severe bleeding events and strokes was detected in the group receiving anticoagulation, suggesting that aspirin may be the drug of choice for most patients in this context.     

比伐卢定联合替罗非班在高血栓负荷拟行PPCI治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用价值

目的:探讨替罗非班与比伐卢定联合治疗在高血栓负荷拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入(PPCI)的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的应用价值。方法:选取我院于2018年3月~2020年3月期间收治的127例高血栓负荷拟行PPCI治疗的STEMI患者。将所有患者按照入院顺序,单号分为对照组(替罗非班治疗),双号分为观察组(比伐卢定联合替罗非班治疗),分别为63例和64例。对比两组术后24 h、术后30 d支架内血栓事件、30 d内的出血事件发生率,对比两组心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)血流分级变化、心功能及肌酸激酶同工酶(CKMB)峰值时间及CKMB峰值,记录两组术后不良心血管事件发生率及住院时间。结果:两组术后24 h、术后30 d均未发生支架内血栓事件,观察组30 d内的出血事件发生率较对照组低(P<0.05)。两组住院时间组间对比无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组术后1个月TIMI血流分级为Ⅲ级的占比高于术前同一分级,TIMI血流分级为0~Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级的占比低于术前同一分级(P<0.05)。观察组术后7 d左心室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、CKMB峰值小于对照组,左心室射血分数(LVEF)高于对照组,CKMB峰值时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组心血管不良事件总发生率对比无差异(P>0.05)。结论:比伐卢定联合替罗非班治疗高血栓负荷拟行PPCI的STEMI患者,可改善患者心功能,减少心肌损伤,改善TIMI血流分级,同时还可减少30 d内的出血事件发生率。