组蛋白乙酰化／去乙酰化作用与真核基因转录调控

核小体组蛋白的翻译后修饰是真核基因转录调控中的关键步骤。对于组蛋白的这类修饰方式 ,近年来研究最为活跃的是组蛋白Ｎ末端区域保守的Ｌｙｓ上ε ＮＨ 3 的乙酰化作用。随着各种组蛋白乙酰化酶 /去乙酰化酶被克隆、鉴定 ,组蛋白乙酰化 /去乙酰化作用与真核基因转录调控之间的关系也开始逐步得以阐明。1 .真核转录相关的组蛋白乙酰化酶和组蛋白去乙酰化酶1 .1　组蛋白乙酰化酶 (ｈｉｓｔｏｎｅａｃｅｔｙｌｔｒａｎｓ ｆｅｒａｓｅ ,ＨＡＴ)　　核小体组蛋白中Ｎ末端区域上保守的Ｌｙｓ的乙酰化是染色质具有转录活性的标志之一。在组蛋白…     

染色质修饰酶在记忆中的作用

学习记忆的形成依赖于转录机制.近年研究发现,染色质修饰在基因表达调节中起重要作用.组蛋白乙酰化和去乙酰化是染色质修饰中最为常见调节方式,参与基因的转录调控.乙酰化可以激活转录,促进记忆的形成.组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂可以增强突触可塑性,改善记忆损伤.因此,对于染色质修饰的深入研究,不仅有助于阐明记忆形成的分子机制,而且对记忆相关疾病的治疗以及新药物研发也具有重要指导意义.本文主要就组蛋白乙酰转移酶调节基因转录以及组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂促进记忆形成的作用机理进行综述.     

组蛋白去乙酰化酶的结构及应用

组蛋白赖氨酸乙酰化是目前研究最为广泛和深入的组蛋白翻译后修饰之一,在染色质重塑和基因表达调控等方面发挥重要作用,这种修饰在体内受到组蛋白乙酰化酶和去乙酰化酶的高度动态调控.除了以组蛋白为底物外,组蛋白去乙酰化酶还可以催化多种非组蛋白的去乙酰化,参与多种生命过程的调节.本文围绕四类人源组蛋白去乙酰化酶,综述了其分类依据、结构与功能特点、催化反应的分子机制,以及针对这些组蛋白去乙酰化酶的抑制剂和激动剂的开发和应用等方面的研究进展.     

综述: 组蛋白去乙酰化酶的结构及应用

组蛋白赖氨酸乙酰化是目前研究最为广泛和深入的组蛋白翻译后修饰之一,在染色质重塑和基因表达调控等方面发挥重要作用,这种修饰在体内受到组蛋白乙酰化酶和去乙酰化酶的高度动态调控．除了以组蛋白为底物外,组蛋白去乙酰化酶还可以催化多种非组蛋白的去乙酰化,参与多种生命过程的调节．本文围绕四类人源组蛋白去乙酰化酶,综述了其分类依据、结构与功能特点、催化反应的分子机制,以及针对这些组蛋白去乙酰化酶的抑制剂和激动剂的开发和应用等方面的研究进展．     

组蛋白去乙酰化酶4与人类疾病北大核心CSCD

组蛋白去乙酰化酶4(histone deacetylase 4,HDAC4)是一类依赖锌的去乙酰化酶,属于Ⅱ类组蛋白去乙酰化酶(histone deacetylases,HDACs),主要具有去乙酰化酶的活性。HDAC4由去乙酰化酶结构域发挥去乙酰化酶的作用,还具有核定位序列和核输出序列,通过转录后与翻译后水平的修饰可在细胞核和细胞质之间穿梭,进而参与多种调节过程。近年来的研究发现,HDAC4可参与基因的转录调控、细胞凋亡、代谢等诸多生物进程,在多种疾病的发生发展中发挥重要作用。本文主要从HDAC4的结构、去乙酰作用、自身的修饰及其在核浆中的穿梭作用对其进行概述,同时对其在骨关节炎、心血管疾病、肌萎缩性侧索硬化症等不同疾病中的作用、相关的分子机制及组蛋白抑制剂在肿瘤中的应用等方面的研究进展进行综述。     

组蛋白乙酰化与真核基因的转录

在真核生物的染色质结构中,核小体核心组蛋白氨基末端可以被组蛋白乙酰基转移酶（ＨＡＴｓ）修饰。这种可逆乙酰化修饰作用可使染色质结构发生动态调整,从而影响基因的转录活性。     

谷子(Setaria italica L.)组蛋白修饰酶类基因的挖掘

组蛋白修饰是表观遗传学领域中一种重要的修饰方式,可经多种组蛋白修饰酶类催化产生.为了研究谷子(Setaria italica L.)基因组中组蛋白修饰酶类基因的特征,本研究利用比较基因组学的方法,以水稻(Oryza sativa)基因组注释信息为参考,对谷子的组蛋白修饰酶类基因进行挖掘,共发现80个谷子组蛋白修饰酶类相关基因,并根据组蛋白乙酰化酶/去乙酰化酶、甲基化酶/去甲基化酶绘制系统进化树,每部分都能根据其行使的功能聚类.组蛋白修饰酶类基因的鉴定是阐明不同生物表观遗传调控机制的重要步骤.本研究为详细探讨这些基因在谷子表观遗传修饰中的功能和作用提供初步的理论依据和参考.     

组蛋白去乙酰化酶4与人类疾病

组蛋白去乙酰化酶4（histone deacetylase 4,HDAC4）是一类依赖锌的去乙酰化酶,属于Ⅱ类组蛋白去乙酰化酶（histone deacetylases,HDACs）,主要具有去乙酰化酶的活性。HDAC4由去乙酰化酶结构域发挥去乙酰化酶的作用,还具有核定位序列和核输出序列,通过转录后与翻译后水平的修饰可在细胞核和细胞质之间穿梭,进而参与多种调节过程。近年来的研究发现,HDAC4可参与基因的转录调控、细胞凋亡、代谢等诸多生物进程,在多种疾病的发生发展中发挥重要作用。本文主要从HDAC4的结构、去乙酰作用、自身的修饰及其在核浆中的穿梭作用对其进行概述,同时对其在骨关节炎、心血管疾病、肌萎缩性侧索硬化症等不同疾病中的作用、相关的分子机制及组蛋白抑制剂在肿瘤中的应用等方面的研究进展进行综述。     

植物组蛋白乙酰基转移酶的研究进展

组蛋白乙酰化是一个动态的、可逆的过程,包括组蛋白乙酰化和去乙酰化两个过程。组蛋白乙酰基转移酶催化组蛋白乙酰化,与组蛋白去乙酰化酶共同作用来调节组蛋白乙酰化状态。组蛋白乙酰化状态影响染色质的结构,进而影响基因的转录,在植物的生长、发育和胁迫反应过程中具有十分重要的调节作用。对组蛋白乙酰基转移酶的细胞内分布、分类、底物特异性以及在发育和胁迫反应中的功能进行了综述。     

组蛋白乙酰化与癌症

由于组蛋白被修饰所引起的染色质结构的改变,在真核生物基因表达调控中发挥着重要的作用,这些修饰主要包括甲基化、乙酰化、磷酸化和泛素化等,其中组蛋白乙酰化尤为重要.组蛋白乙酰转移酶（HAT）和组蛋白去乙酰化酶（HDAC）参与决定组蛋白乙酰化状态.HAT通常作为多亚基辅激活物复合体的一部分,催化组蛋白乙酰化,导致染色质结构的松散、激活转录;而HDAC是多亚基辅抑制物复合体的一部分,使组蛋白去乙酰化,导致染色质集缩,并抑制基因的转录. 编码这些酶的基因染色体易位易于导致急性白血病的发生.另一方面,已经确定了一些乙酰化修饰酶的基因在染色体上的位置,它们尤其倾向定位于染色体的断裂处.综述了HAT和HDAC参与的组蛋白乙酰化与癌症发生之间关系的最新进展,以期进一步阐明组蛋白乙酰化修饰酶的生物学功能以及它们在癌症发生过程中的作用.     

Dynamics of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Rates of turnover for the posttranslational acetylation of core histones were measured in logarithmically growing yeast cells by radioactive acetate labeling to near steady-state conditions. On average, acetylation half-lives were approximately 15 min for histone H4, 10 min for histone H3, 4 min for histone H2B, and 5 min for histone H2A. These rates were much faster than the several hours that have previously been reported for the rate of general histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. The current estimates are in line with changes in histone acetylation detected directly at specific chromatin locations and the speed of changes in gene expression that can be observed. These results emphasize that histone acetylation within chromatin is subject to constant flux. Detailed analysis revealed that the turnover rates for acetylation of histone H3 are the same from mono- through penta-acetylated forms. A large fraction of acetylated histone H3, including possibly all tetra- and penta-acetylated forms, appears subject to acetylation turnover. In contrast, the rate of acetylation turnover for mono- and di-acetylated forms of histones H4 and H2B, and the fraction subject to acetylation turnover, was lower than for multi-acetylated forms of these histones. This difference may reflect the difference in location of these histones within the nucleosome, a difference in the spectrum of histone-specific acetylating and deacetylating enzymes, and a difference in the role of acetylation in different histones.     

Unfolding of nucleosome cores induced by chemical acetylation of histones

Relative accessibility of nucleosomal histones to acetic anhydride during acetylation has been studied as a function of concentration, pH and ionic strength of the solution using high-resolution gel-electrophoresis. It was shown that about 80% of lysine residues in nucleosomal histones and 100% of the same residues in histone complexes without DNA in 2 M NaCl are accessible to the modification, which is proved by the localization of the majority of lysine residues in nucleosomes near the surface of the histone octamer, by their participation in ionic interactions with DNA and, probably, in histone-histone contacts. Gel-electrophoretic experiments with nucleosomes and studies of the histone resistance to mild trypsinolysis indicated that neither nucleosomes themselves nor histone octamers are affected even though 50% of lysine residues in histones have been acetylated. The process of acetylation is accompanied by the growing tendency of histones to participate in mild trypsinolysis and by a gradual decline in electrophoretic mobility and in the value of the sedimentation constant. The circular dichroism spectra and the microscopic appearance of nucleosomes are also markedly changed. These results suggest that a gradual unfolding of nucleosomes occurs when 5 or more lysine residues in the nucleosomal histones have been acetylated.     

K8 and K12 are biotinylated in human histone H4.

Folding of DNA into chromatin is mediated by binding to histones such as H4; association of DNA with histones is regulated by covalent histone modifications, e.g. acetylation, methylation, and biotinylation. We sought to identify amino-acid residues that are biotinylated in histone H4, and to determine whether acetylation and methylation of histones affect biotinylation. Synthetic peptides spanning fragments of human histone H4 were biotinylated enzymatically using biotinidase. Peptide-bound biotin was probed with streptavidin-peroxidase. Peptides based on the N-terminal sequence of histone H4 were effectively recognized by biotinidase as substrates for biotinylation; in contrast, peptides based on the C-terminal sequences were not biotinylated. Substitution of K8 or K12 with alanine or arginine decreased biotinylation, suggesting that these lysines are targets for biotinylation; K8 and K12 are also known targets for acetylation. Chemical acetylation or methylation of a given lysine decreased subsequent enzymatic biotinylation of neighboring lysines, consistent with cross-talk among histone modifications. Substitution of a given lysine (positive charge) with glutamate (negative charge) abolished biotinylation of neighboring lysines, providing evidence that the net charge of histones has a role in biotinylation. An antibody was generated that specifically recognized histone H4 biotinylated at K12. This antibody was used to detect biotinylated histone H4 in nuclear extracts from human cells. These studies suggest that K8 and K12 in histone H4 are targets for biotinylation, that acetylation and biotinylation compete for the same binding sites, and that acetylation and methylation of histones affect biotinylation of neighboring lysines.     

Discrete roles for histone acetylation in human T helper 1 cell-specific gene expression

To better understand the control of T helper (TH) 1-expressed genes, we compared and contrasted acetylation and expression for three key genes, IFNG, TBET, and IL18RAP and found them to be distinctly regulated. The TBET and the IFNG genes, but not the IL18RAP gene, showed preferential acetylation of histones H3 and H4 during TH1 differentiation. Analysis of acetylation of specific histone residues revealed that H3(Lys-9), H4(Lys-8), and H4(Lys-12) were preferentially modified in TH1 cells, suggesting a possible contribution of acetylation of these residues for induction of these genes. On the other hand, the acetylation of IL18RAP gene occurred both in TH1 and TH2 cells the similar kinetics and on the same with residues, demonstrating that selective histone acetylation was not universally the case for all TH1-expressed genes. Histone H3 acetylation of IFNG and TBET genes occurred with different kinetics, however, and was distinctively regulated by cytokines. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-18 enhanced the histone acetylation of the IFNG gene. By contrast, histone acetylation of the TBET gene was markedly suppressed by IL-4, whereas IL-12 and IL-18 had only modest effects suggesting that histone acetylation during TH1 differentiation is a process that is regulated by various factors at multiple levels. By treating Th2 cells with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, we restored histone acetylation of the IFNG and TBET genes, but it did not fully restore their expression in TH2 cells, again suggesting that histone acetylation explains one but not all the aspects of TH1-specific gene expression.     

Lysine residues in N-terminal and C-terminal regions of human histone H2A are targets for biotinylation by biotinidase

In eukaryotic cell nuclei, DNA associates with the core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 to form nucleosomal core particles. DNA binding to histones is regulated by posttranslational modifications of N-terminal tails (e.g., acetylation and methylation of histones). These modifications play important roles in the epigenetic control of chromatin structure. Recently, evidence that biotinidase and holocarboxylase synthetase (HCS) catalyze the covalent binding of biotin to histones has been provided. The primary aim of this study was to identify biotinylation sites in histone H2A and its variant H2AX. Secondary aims were to determine whether acetylation and methylation of histone H2A affect subsequent biotinylation and whether biotinidase and HCS localize to the nucleus in human cells. Biotinylation sites were identified using synthetic peptides as substrates for biotinidase. These studies provided evidence that K9 and K13 in the N-terminus of human histones H2A and H2AX are targets for biotinylation and that K125, K127 and K129 in the C-terminus of histone H2A are targets for biotinylation. Biotinylation of lysine residues was decreased by acetylation of adjacent lysines but was increased by dimethylation of adjacent arginines. The existence of biotinylated histone H2A in vivo was confirmed by using modification-specific antibodies. Antibodies to biotinidase and HCS localized primarily to the nuclear compartment, consistent with a role for these enzymes in regulating chromatin structure. Collectively, these studies have identified five novel biotinylation sites in human histones; histone H2A is unique among histones in that its biotinylation sites include amino acid residues from the C-terminus.     

Changes in histone acetylation during mouse oocyte meiosis

We examined global changes in the acetylation of histones in mouse oocytes during meiosis. Immunocytochemistry with specific antibodies against various acetylated lysine residues on histones H3 and H4 showed that acetylation of all the lysines decreased to undetectable or negligible levels in the oocytes during meiosis, whereas most of these lysines were acetylated during mitosis in preimplantation embryos and somatic cells. When the somatic cell nuclei were transferred into enucleated oocytes, the acetylation of lysines decreased markedly. This type of deacetylation was inhibited by trichostatin A, a specific inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC), thereby indicating that HDAC is able to deacetylate histones during meiosis but not during mitosis. Meiosis-specific deacetylation may be a consequence of the accessibility of HDAC1 to the chromosome, because HDAC1 colocalized with the chromosome during meiosis but not during mitosis. As histone acetylation is thought to play a role in propagating the gene expression pattern to the descendent generation during mitosis, and the gene expression pattern of differentiated oocytes is reprogrammed during meiosis to allow the initiation of a new program by totipotent zygotes of the next generation, our results suggest that the oocyte cytoplasm initializes a program of gene expression by deacetylating histones.     

Dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation in the first cell cycle of cloned mouse embryos

Epigenetic reprogramming is thought to play an important role in the development of cloned embryos reconstructed by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). In the present study, dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation modifications was investigated in the first cell cycle of cloned embryos. Our results demonstrated that part of somatic inherited lysine acetylation on core histones (H3K9, H3K14, H4K16) could be quickly deacetylated following SCNT, and reacetylation occurred following activation treatment. However, acetylation marks of the other lysine residues on core histones (H4K8, H4K12) persisted in the genome of cloned embryos with only mild deacetylation occurring in the process of SCNT and activation treatment. The somatic cloned embryos established histone acetylation modifications resembling those in normal embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection through these two different programs. Moreover, treatment of cloned embryos with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, Trichostatin A (TSA), improved the histone acetylation in a manner similar to that in normal embryos, and the improved histone acetylation in cloned embryos treated with TSA might contribute to improved development of TSA-treated clones. In contrast to the asymmetric histone H3K9 tri- and dimethylation present in the parental genomes of fertilized embryos, the tri- and dimethylations of H3K9 were gradually demethylated in the cloned embryos, and this histone H3K9 demethylation may be crucial for gene activation of cloned embryos. Together, our results indicate that dynamic reprogramming of histone acetylation and methylation modifications in cloned embryos is developmentally regulated.