三种粪便总DNA提取方法的比较

目的比较不同粪便总DNA提取方法对肠道菌群多样性研究的影响。方法采用Bead beating法、化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit提取同一份人粪便样品的总DNA,对比3种方法的DNA得率和16S rRNA基因V3区的变性梯度凝胶电泳（DGGE）图谱。结果Bead beating法的DNA得率约是其他2种方法的2倍;3种方法得到的DGGE图谱的Dice相似性为60％～70％,2条优势条带只出现在Bead beating法图谱中。在2～5min的Bead beating法击打时间里,DNA得率随击打时间的延长有一定的增加,但DGGE图谱无显著变化。结论不同的DNA提取方法会影响菌群的多样性分析。比较其他2种方法,Bead beating的裂解效率更高,能够检测到更多种类的细菌,更合适肠道菌群组成的分子研究。     

快速提取肠道微生物基因组DNA的方法

目的:肠道微生物的研究日益成为热点,如何获取高质量、较完整的肠道菌群基因组DNA是肠道微生物研究中的关键。本文通过对酚/氯仿法提取总DNA过程进行考察和优化,建立一种简便酚/氯仿抽提法。方法:考察和优化酚/氯仿法提取总DNA的过程,并根据DNA产量、纯度以及ERIC-PCR及16S rNDA-RFLP所反映的微生物群落结构特性的指标,并与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit提取的进行比较,评价了所建立的快速提取方法。结果:用简便酚/氯仿法得到基本完整的基因组DNA,ERIC-PCR和16S rDNA-RFLP结果与QIAamp?DNA Stool Mini Kit法基本相同。结论:该方法快速并成本低,适合肠道微生物研究中总DNA提取,尤其适合处理大批量的样品。     

四种小鼠肠道微生物DNA提取方法比较

采用异硫氰酸胍(guandine thiocyanate,GITC)法、Tiangen DNA提取试剂盒、Omega DNA提取试剂盒和广泛应用的十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide,CTAB)法提取小鼠粪便微生物总DNA,通过比较所提取DNA的浓度和纯度,发现粪便DNA提取试剂盒提取的DNA纯度最高但浓度最低;CTAB法所得的DNA浓度最高但纯度最低;GITC法所得DNA的浓度高于粪便DNA提取试剂盒,纯度高于CTAB法。通过变性梯度凝胶电泳(16S r DNA-PCR-DGGE)指纹图谱分析技术进一步比较了各种提取方法所代表微生物群落的丰富度和多样性。结果表明,GITC法提取得到的DNA所代表细菌的丰富度和多样性显著高于其他3种方法。本实验所建立的GITC法可更全面地反映肠道微生物的多样性和群落结构,是一种较为理想的粪便微生物DNA提取方法。     

Trizol RNA提取法在雪貂组织的流感病毒H3N2定量PCR检测中优于RNeasy mini kit（Qiagen）柱子法

目的比较RNeasy mini kit（Qiagen）柱子法和Trizol法提取RNA在雪貂肺和肠组织H3N2 SYBRGreen PCR定量中的去干扰作用,从而找到适合该定量体系的RNA提取方法。方法比较Trizol法,RNeasy minikit柱子法,改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法1和改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法2提取肺肠组织RNA的质量,RNA逆转录成cDNA后,利用SYBR Green PCR方法检测样品中H3N2的载量,比较产物的特异性,综合评价RNA提取方法。结果 4种方法提取的肺和肠组织的RNA质量不相同,紫外分光光度仪测得RNeasy mini kit柱子法提取的RNA的A260/280低于1.8,其余3种方法的A 260/280在1.8～2.1之间,A 260/230只有Trizol法能达到2.0左右,其余3种方法均远低于2.0。电泳可见Trizol法提取的RNA有3条带：28 s、18 s和5 s,而RNeasy mini kit柱子法的RNA除了有28 s、18 s外,还有基因组DNA,改良RNeasy mini kit柱子法1和2提取的RNA只有28 s和18 s带。RNA逆转录后进行荧光定量PCR,从溶解曲线看,不论是鼻甲刮取物还是肺肠组织的样品模板,4种方法获得的样品与标准品均为单一峰溶解曲线峰,并且波峰位置重叠。而鼻甲刮取物定量的产物跑琼脂糖凝胶电泳均为单一的特异性条带,而肺肠组织的产物电泳发现：Trizol法获得的模板定量产物与标准品一致,为单一的特异性条带,而其它3种方法获得的模板则均有非特异性条带。结论鼻甲刮取物的病毒定量选用RNeasy mini kit柱子法提取定量结果与Trizol法一样可靠,说明对于简单样品该体系及引物非常适用,结果可信。对于组织样品肺和肠,Trizol法获得的样品定量结果比其它3种方法可靠。     

基于DNA复合条形码技术的蝗虫肠道共生真菌多样性研究

利用DNA复合条形码技术,研究了11个样本的蝗虫肠道共生真菌的多样性。结果显示:ITS在所研究的物种中鉴定了5门16纲29目40属2786 OTU真菌。肠道真菌群落组成分析结果显示:所有物种肠道真菌类群中含量最高的是木耳菌目和银耳目,其中斑翅蝗科的真菌类群多样性相对最高,斑腿蝗科的真菌类群多样性相对最低,表明各蝗虫肠道之间存在着明显的菌群多样性变化。α多样性分析结果显示:斑翅蝗科的共生真菌群落丰富度和多样性最高,斑腿蝗科的则最低。β多样性分析结果显示:(1)同科的各个种的肠道真菌群落结构差异性较小,不同科的种的肠道真菌群落结构差异性较大;(2)剑角蝗科的肠道真菌群落结构与其他物种的相似性均相对较低,而且在两个不同取样地得到的中华剑角蝗的真菌群落结构相似性也相对较低。聚类分析结果显示:(1)同科的蝗虫肠道真菌首先聚到一起,且群落相似性也相对较高;(2)布勒掷孢酵母属、内疣衣属和外瓶霉属3个属在蝗虫肠道真菌中是优势菌属。     

应用PCR-DGGE技术分析BKS-2型糖尿病模型小鼠盲肠内容物微生物菌群结构

通过对BKS-DB 2型糖尿病小鼠盲肠内容物微生物群落结构的分析,探讨基因突变模型鼠肠道微生物群落与糖尿病发生的相关性。提取BKS-DB 2型糖尿病小鼠与同窝对照小鼠盲肠内容物细菌总DNA,PCR扩增16S rRNA基因V3区,DGGE方法检测扩增产物,并挑选特异条带测序,对图谱作UPGAMA聚类分析,运用SPSS软件分析多样性。结果显示,UPGAMA聚类分析表明,对照组样本之间相似度0.66-0.91,糖尿病组样本之间相似度0.61-0.88,两组之间最高相似度为0.51。特异性条带测序后经比对与Parabacteroides菌属亲缘关系最近。SPSS统计分析糖尿病组和健康对照组小鼠的DGGE条带数、多样性指数(H’)、丰富度(R)和优势度(D)的差异性显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。糖尿病组小鼠与对照组小鼠的盲肠内容物微生物群落多样性存在差异,糖尿病对肠道微生物的多样性有影响。     

用于微生物多样性分析的棉田土壤总DNA的提取

目的：探讨适用于微生物多样性研究的棉田土壤微生物总DNA提取方法。方法：采用4种方法提取不同连作和轮作处理的棉田土壤微生物总DNA,比较其纯度、产率、片段大小,并应用ARDRA技术验证其质量。结果：其中3种方法均可获得23kb的DNA片段,但不同方法提取的DNA的产率和纯度上有明显差异。改良CTAB-SDS法提取的DNA完整性好,得率为24.20μg.g-1干土,纯化后A260/A280和A260/A230为分别为1.80和1.70,纯化回收率可达70.1%,完全适用于后续的PCR分析。结论：采用该法提取棉田土壤总DNA简便而高效。对该法提取获得的棉田土壤微生物总DNA进行ARDRA和DGGE分析,所得图谱能较全面地反映不同处理间微生物多样性及群落结构的差别,为不同栽培体系下棉田土壤微生物的分子生态学研究提供了基础。     

沼气池污泥微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

沼气发酵系统是一个复杂的生态系统,其污泥微生物超过99%是不可培养的。为了优化沼气池纤维素的转化效率、沼气的产率和开展污泥微生物多样性研究,本研究采用化学裂解法、溶菌酶裂解法和QIAampDNA Stool Mini Kit提取了沼气池污泥样品中微生物的总DNA,对三种方法的DNA得率、纯度、大片段提取效果以及是否含有PCR反应抑制剂进行了研究,最后对16S rRNA基因V3区的扩增产物进行了PCR变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)分析。与化学裂解法和QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit法相比,溶菌酶裂解法得到的DNA量大、片段长、片段分布广、PCR扩增效率高;同时PCR-DGGE图谱显示,溶菌酶裂解法可更好地展示沼气池污泥中微生物的多样性。该结果为进一步提高沼气池中纤维素的转化效率和沼气生产优势菌种的质和量打下了一定的前期基础。     

不同粪便DNA提取方法比较分析北大核心CSCD

肠道微生物群落结构和多样性与人体疾病密切相关。然而,相关群落结构分析结果可能受到DNA提取质量等实验因素影响。因此,评估不同DNA提取方法对肠道特定种属的提取效果,对于全面、准确获取人体肠道微生物谱,深入探究肠道微生物群落结构具有指导意义。本研究旨在借助实时荧光定量PCR(real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction,RT qPCR)技术,以DNA提取纯度、浓度,以及对肠道中特定种属微生物基因组DNA的提取丰度为指标,对5种DNA提取方法进行比较分析。结果表明,试剂盒Q的提取效果最佳,特别是对乳杆菌属和双歧杆菌属等革兰氏阳性菌的提取效果较好。N试剂盒的平均DNA提取浓度较Q试剂盒低,但在纯度方面,二者无显著性差异。与其他3种商用试剂盒(M、PSP、TG)相比,N方法对肠道内指定微生物基因组的提取效果仅次于Q试剂盒,位居第二。相比之下,M试剂盒提取所得DNA,质量较高,但浓度偏低,对于肠道内革兰氏阳性菌的提取效果不很理想。TG试剂盒和PSP试剂盒提取所得DNA在浓度、质量以及细菌丰度方面均不及其他验证的试剂盒。综上,Q试剂盒可作为肠道微生态研究相关实验中获取高质量基因组DNA的提取方法。本研究结果为肠道微生态研究相关实验中基因组DNA提取方法的选择提供参考依据。     

重金属污染土壤总DNA提取方法的研究——土壤预处理和硫酸铵铝在DNA提取中的应用

【目的】从土壤中获得高纯度、高得率和完整性好的总DNA,为重金属污染土壤微生物群落多样性的分析奠定基础。【方法】将一定浓度的硫酸铵铝增补入DNA提取液中,分别联合不同方式的土壤预处理,对所提取的土壤总DNA进行完整性、纯度和得率分析。【结果】TENP-AlNH4(SO4)2法、ABG-AlNH4(SO4)2法、Wash-AlNH4(SO4)2法和试剂盒4种提取方法获得的DNA片段均在23 kb左右,总DNA完整;Wash-AlNH4(SO4)2法提取的DNA纯度较高,A260/A230达到2.00,A260/A280达到1.62;ABG-AlNH4(SO4)2法的DNA得率最高,达到1 010μg/g土壤;这两种方法提取的DNA在纯度和浓度上均达到后续PCR等分子实验要求。通过扩增提取的土壤总DNA中16S rRNA基因,表明合适浓度的硫酸铵铝能有效去除土壤中的PCR干扰因子。【结论】本研究将土壤的预处理和一定浓度的硫酸铵铝联合使用,获得理想的重金属污染土壤的总DNA。     

Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota

Cell lysis efficiency and the quality of DNA extracts from complex bacterial ecosystems are two major concerns in molecular ecological studies of gut microbiota. In this study, we use PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) DNA profiling, random cloning and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA genes to compare the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with the bead beating technique in the preparation of DNA extracts from gut microbiota of pigs. We also developed a washing procedure that can release more than 93% of bacterial cells attached to the gut mucosa. Both the QIAamp kit and bead beating method lysed approximately 95% of bacterial cells. PCR-DGGE DNA profiles of ileal and cecal microbiota from both digesta and mucosa that were generated from the DNA extracts using the two methods were nearly identical. Random cloning and sequence analysis also demonstrated the high quality of DNA extracts using the two methods. Two random clone sets of 16S rRNA genes generated from the DNA extracts had a similar degree of bacterial diversity. Different preparations of DNA extract from a single sample using the QIAamp kit consistently produced similar PCR-DGGE DNA profiles with similarity indexes higher than 99%. Our data suggest the appropriateness of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for the studies of gut microbial ecology and the effectiveness of the QIAamp kit in processing multiple samples for cell lysis and DNA extraction.     

Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples

Several DNA extraction methods have been reported for use with digesta or fecal samples, but problems are often encountered in terms of relatively low DNA yields and/or recovering DNA free of inhibitory substances. Here we report a modified method to extract PCR-quality microbial community DNA from these types of samples, which employs bead beating in the presence of high concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), salt, and EDTA, and with subsequent DNA purification by QIAamp columns [referred to as repeated bead beating plus column (RBB + C) method]. The RBB + C method resulted in a 1.5- to 6-fold increase in DNA yield when compared to three other widely used methods. The community DNA prepared with the RBB + C method was also free of inhibitory substances and resulted in improved denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles, which is indicative of a more complete lysis and representation of microbial diversity present in such samples.     

Comparison of the utility of five commercial kits for extraction of DNA from Aspergillus fumigatus spores

The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of DNA extraction from water as well as from blood samples spiked with A. fumigatus spores, using selected commercial kits. Extraction of DNA according to manufacturer's protocols was preceded by blood cells lysis and disruption of fungal cells by enzymatic digestion or bead beating. The efficiency of DNA extraction was measured by PCR using Aspergillus-specific primers and SYBR Green I dye or TaqMan probes targeting 28S rRNA gene. All methods allowed the detection of Aspergillus at the lowest tested density of water suspensions of spores (101 cells/ml). The highest DNA yield was obtained using the ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA kit, YeastStar Genomic DNA kit, and QIAamp DNA Mini kit with mechanical cell disruption. The ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA and YeastStar kits showed the highest sensitivity in examination of blood samples spiked with Aspergillus (100 % for the detection of 102 spores and 75 % for 101 spores). Recently, the enzymatic method ceased to be recommended for examination of blood samples for Aspergillus, thus ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA kit and QIAamp DNA Mini kit with mechanical cell disruption could be used for extraction of Aspergillus DNA from clinical samples.     

Comparative analysis of three methods from dried blood spots for expeditious DNA extraction from mosquitoes; suitable for PCR based techniques

The objective of this work was to compare the quality, purity and quantity of DNA isolated from dried blood spots (DBS) by three methods (Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE (Tris EDTA)-Buffer). Sample collection was performed in six districts in Odisha, India and screened for cases of clinical malaria and dengue and vector density. Mosquito abdomens were spotted on Whatman 3MM (MERCK) Filter paper and dried for 10 min at room temperature. DNA was isolated from DBS using three methods (Chelex-100, QIAamp DNA mini kit, and TE-Buffer), and PCR was used to determine the feeding behaviours of vector mosquitoes. DNA was quantified using a UV-spectrophotometer, and q-PCR was used to determine the target gene copy number to compare the methods. The QIAamp DNA mini kit method was used as the reference method. The yield and purity of DNA extracted with Chelex-100 and TE were 14–72 ng/µl and 1.51–1.85 and 9–50 ng/µl and 1.68–2.1, respectively. DNA extracted using the Chelex-100 method was stored for over 1 month at ? 20 °C and was suitable for later use. The Chelex-100 method had a sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 78%. A Bland–Altman plot suggested that the Chelex-100 method was similar to the QIAamp DNA mini kit method for determining the feeding behaviours of vector mosquitoes. The Chelex-100 method is simple, cost-effective, and safe and requires minimal time for DNA extraction from dried blood spots. In malaria and dengue research, detecting the feeding behaviours from mosquito DNA from dried blood spots on filter paper by PCR is an easy, minimally invasive and inexpensive molecular technique that can be performed in remote areas.

     

A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples

The purity of DNA extracted from faecal samples is a key issue in the sensitivity and usefulness of biological analyses such as PCR for infectious pathogens and non-pathogens. We have compared the relative efficacy of extraction of bacterial DNA (both Gram negative and positive origin) from faeces using four commercial kits (FastDNA kit, Bio 101; Nucleospin C+T kit, Macherey-Nagal; Quantum Prep Aquapure Genomic DNA isolation kit, Bio-Rad; QIAamp DNA stool mini kit, Qiagen) and a non-commercial guanidium isothiocyanate/silica matrix method. Human faecal samples were spiked with additional known concentrations of Lactobacillus acidophilus or Bacteroides uniformis, the DNA was then extracted by each of the five methods, and tested in genus-specific PCRs. The Nucleospin method was the most sensitive procedure for the extraction of DNA from a pure bacterial culture of Gram-positive L. acidophilus (10(4) bacteria/PCR), and QIAamp and the guanidium method were most sensitive for cultures of Gram-negative B. uniformis (10(3) bacteria/PCR). However, for faecal samples, the QIAamp kit was the most effective extraction method and led to the detection of bacterial DNA over the greatest range of spike concentrations for both B. uniformis and L. acidophilus in primary PCR reactions. A difference in extraction efficacy was observed between faecal samples from different individuals. The use of appropriate DNA extraction kits or methods is critical for successful and valid PCR studies on clinical, experimental or environmental samples and we recommend that DNA extraction techniques are carefully selected with particular regard to the specimen type.     

Optimization of terminal restriction fragment polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of human gut microbiota

Some compounds originating from the human gut microbial metabolism of exogenous and endogenous substrates may have properties that profoundly affect the host's physiological processes. The influence of these metabolites on differences in disease risk among individuals could be mediated by metabolism specific to the gut microbial community composition. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of terminal restriction fragment polymorphism (TRFLP) as a biomarker of the fecal microbial community (as a surrogate of gut microbiota) for application in human population-based studies. We tested the effects of experimental conditions on DNA quality, DNA quantity, and TRFLP patterns derived from gut bacterial communities. Genomic DNA was extracted from fecal slurries and the bacterial 16S rDNA genes were amplified and analyzed by TRFLP. We found that the composition of the TRFLP fingerprints varied by different extraction procedure. The best quality and quantity of community DNA extracted from fecal material was obtained by using the QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) with 95 degrees C incubation and moderate bead beating treatment during the cell-lysis step. Homogenization of fecal samples reduced variation among replicates. Once the TRFLP procedure was optimized, we assessed the methodological and inter-individual variation in gut microbial community fingerprints. The methodological variation ranged from 4.5-8.1% and inter-individual variation was 50.3% for common peaks. In conclusion, standardized TRFLP is a robust, reproducible, and high-throughput method that will provide a useful biomarker for characterizing gut microbiota in human fecal samples.     

两种粪便保存方法对肠道菌群结构研究的影响

目的比较2种粪便保存方法（室温法和Invitek公司的粪便稳定剂保存法）对菌群结构研究的影响。方法应用PCR-变性梯度凝胶电泳技术（PCR-DGGE）方法,对用2种方法保存的3位志愿者粪便样品进行菌群结构的分析。结果室温法保存粪便样品24h后,S1个体菌群结构与原始样品的菌群结构相似度为83％,S2和S3的菌群结构与其原始样品的相似度仅为77％。而使用粪便稳定剂保存1d,期间各时间点样品菌群结构与原始样品相比变化较小,相似度在80％-90％。结论粪便稳定剂具有一定的稳定样品菌群结构的作用,在新鲜粪佰样品不能寺刻讲行深冻的情况下,使用粪便稳定剂是一种较好的样品保存方法。     

Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces

AIMS: To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria. Total anaerobic bacteria, C. perfringens and Lactobacillus of faeces were counted (as CFU g(-1) faeces) for 48-h incubation at 37 degrees C in an anaerobic gas chamber on genus-selective media. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted by the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit. The quantification of DNA (as DNA copy per gram faeces) by real-time PCR was performed with a LightCycler system with the QuantiTect SYBR green PCR kit for PCR amplification. The results indicated that there was a significant correlation between CFU and DNA copy of Lactobacillus (R2 = 0.78, P < 0.01) and total anaerobic bacteria (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.05); but no correlation was found between CFU and DNA copy of C. perfringens. The regression equations for Lactobacillus and total anaerobic bacteria were log(DNA copy) = 0.83 x log(CFU) + 1.43 and log(DNA copy) = 1.62 x log(CFU) - 6.32 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The real-time PCR method could be used to enumerate Lactobacillus within 2 days when compared with plating method which requires 5-6 days. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The real-time PCR method and the primer set for Lactobacillus spp. harboured in the dog intestine can be used for rapid enumeration of lactobacilli and monitoring of the faecal Lactobacillus community.