香蕉果实冷胁迫相关MaWRKY11转录因子的特性、互作蛋白筛选与鉴定

为探讨香蕉(Musa acuminata)响应冷胁迫的分子机制,从香蕉果实冷害的数字基因表达谱中筛选并分离了1 个WRKY转录因子,命名为MaWRKY11。MaWRKY11 具有2 个WRKY 保守结构域,属于I 类WRKY 成员,定位于细胞核,是核蛋白。MaWRKY11 具有转录激活活性,且激活区在N 端。实时荧光定量PCR 分析表明MaWRKY11 受冷胁迫诱导,外源茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)处理减轻香蕉果实冷害的同时也上调了其表达。另外,酵母双杂交筛选表明,MaWRKY11 可与脱水诱导的早期应答蛋白MaERD 相互作用。这些表明MaWRKY11 可能通过与逆境相关蛋白如MaERD 互作来响应香蕉果实的冷胁迫。     

植物中逆境反应相关的WRKY转录因子研究进展

WRKY转录因子是植物体内一类比较大的转录因子家族,它在植物的生长发育以及抗逆境反应中起着非常重要的作用。本文综述了WRKY转录因子在植物应对冻害、干旱、盐害等非生物胁迫与病原菌、虫害等生物胁迫反应中的重要调控功能,并概括了WRKY转录因子在调控这些逆境反应中的机制。     

Marker Gene Overexpression in Flowers Treated with Resistance Inducers does not Correlate with Protection Against Flower‐Infecting Fungi in Tomato and Blueberry

Flowers can serve as infection courts for specialized and unspecialized plant pathogens, but little is known about the ability of floral tissues to undergo induced resistance (IR) responses against these pathogens. We studied the expression of IR marker genes in tomato and blueberry flowers treated with the inducers methyl jasmonate (MeJA), benzothiadiazole‐S‐methyl ester (BTH) and 2,6‐dichloroisonicotinic acid (INA). In tomato, spray application of MeJA and BTH (but not INA) to entire plants (leaves, stems and flowers) resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) overexpression of Pin2 (5.2‐fold) and PR‐4 (5.6‐fold) in pistil tissues, respectively. A statistically similar expression was obtained in pistils when flowers were protected from direct spray, indicating a systemic response. In blueberry, where information about IR marker genes is limited, PR‐3 and PR‐4 orthologs were first identified and characterized using in silico and wet‐laboratory techniques. In subsequent induction experiments, INA and BTH induced overexpression of PR‐4 in blueberry pistils by 3.2‐ and 1.8‐fold, respectively, when entire plants were treated. In blueberry flowers protected from spray applications, all chemicals applied to vegetative tissues led to significant overexpression of PR‐4 (MeJA: 1.4‐fold, BTH: 2.9‐fold and INA: 1.6‐fold), with BTH also inducing PR‐3 (1.7‐fold). The effect of these responses in protecting flowers was studied by inoculating treated tomato flowers with the necrotroph Botrytis cinerea and blueberry flowers with the hemi‐biotroph Monilinia vaccinii‐corymbosi. In both pathosystems, no significant disease suppression associated with resistance inducer application was observed under the conditions studied. Thus, although IR marker genes were shown to be inducible in floral tissue, the magnitude of this response was insufficient to suppress pathogen ingress.