S5a promotes protein degradation by blocking synthesis of nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains

Ubiquitin (Ub)–protein conjugates formed by purified ring‐finger or U‐box E3s with the E2, UbcH5, resist degradation and disassembly by 26S proteasomes. These chains contain multiple types of Ub forks in which two Ub's are linked to adjacent lysines on the proximal Ub. We tested whether cells contain factors that prevent formation of nondegradable conjugates and whether the forked chains prevent proteasomal degradation. S5a is a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) protein present in the cytosol and in the 26S proteasome. Addition of S5a or a GST‐fusion of S5a's UIM domains to a ubiquitination reaction containing 26S proteasomes, UbcH5, an E3 (MuRF1 or CHIP), and a protein substrate, dramatically stimulated its degradation, provided S5a was present during ubiquitination. Mass spectrometry showed that S5a and GST–UIM prevented the formation of Ub forks without affecting synthesis of standard isopeptide linkages. The forked Ub chains bind poorly to 26S proteasomes unlike those synthesized with S5a present or linked to Lys63 or Lys48 chains. Thus, S5a (and presumably certain other UIM proteins) function with certain E3/E2 pairs to ensure synthesis of efficiently degraded non‐forked Ub conjugates.     

Certain pairs of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) synthesize nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains containing all possible isopeptide linkages

It is generally assumed that a specific ubiquitin ligase (E3) links protein substrates to polyubiquitin chains containing a single type of isopeptide linkage, and that chains composed of linkages through Lys(48), but not through Lys(63), target proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, when we carried out a systematic analysis of the types of ubiquitin (Ub) chains formed by different purified E3s and Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), we found, using Ub mutants and mass spectrometry, that the U-box E3, CHIP, and Ring finger E3s, MuRF1 and Mdm2, with the E2, UbcH5, form a novel type of Ub chain that contains all seven possible linkages, but predominantly Lys(48), Lys(63), and Lys(11) linkages. Also, these heterogeneous chains contain forks (bifurcations), where two Ub molecules are linked to the adjacent lysines at Lys(6) + Lys(11), Lys(27) + Lys(29), or Lys(29) + Lys(33) on the preceding Ub molecule. However, the HECT domain E3s, E6AP and Nedd4, with the same E2, UbcH5, form homogeneous chains exclusively, either Lys(48) chains (E6AP) or Lys(63) chains (Nedd4). Furthermore, with other families of E2s, CHIP and MuRF1 synthesize homogeneous Ub chains on the substrates. Using the dimeric E2, UbcH13/Uev1a, they attach Lys(63) chains, but with UbcH1 (E2-25K), MuRF1 synthesizes Lys(48) chains on the substrate. We then compared the capacity of the forked heterogeneous chains and homogeneous chains to support proteasomal degradation. When troponin I was linked by MuRF1 to a Lys(48)-Ub chain or, surprisingly, to a Lys(63)-Ub chain, troponin I was degraded rapidly by pure 26S proteasomes. However, when linked to the mixed forked chains, troponin I was degraded quite poorly, and its polyUb chain, especially the forked linkages, was disassembled slowly by proteasome-associated isopeptidases. Because these Ring finger and U-box E3s with UbcH5 target proteins for degradation in vivo, but Lys(63) chains do not, cells probably contain additional factors that prevent formation of such nondegradable Ub-conjugates and that protect proteins linked to Lys(63)-Ub chains from proteasomal degradation.     

Antiproliferative proteins of the BTG/Tob family are degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

BTG/Tob family proteins, which are characterized by similarities in their N-terminal BTG/Tob homology domains, control cell growth negatively. Among the BTG/Tob family members, BTG2/TIS21/PC3 proteins have been reported to have short lives and to be degraded by the proteasome. However, the mechanisms regulating the stabilities of other BTG/Tob family proteins have not yet been clarified. Here, we report that BTG1, Tob, and Tob2 proteins, as well as BTG2 protein, are degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system; the degradation of Tob protein in HeLa cells and the degradation of BTG1, BTG2, Tob and Tob2 proteins transiently expressed in HEK293 cells were inhibited by treatments with proteasome-specific inhibitors. Co-expression of BTG1, BTG2, Tob, or Tob2 protein with ubiquitin in HEK293 cells revealed specific multiubiquitination of each of the four proteins. Although the full-length and N-terminal truncated forms of BTG1, BTG2, Tob, and Tob2 proteins were unstable, the respective C-terminal truncated forms were found to be almost stable, suggesting that the C-terminal regions control the stabilities of BTG1, BTG2, Tob, and Tob2 proteins. In addition, it was found that the respective C-terminal regions confer instability on green fluorescent protein, a normally stable protein. Thus, it can be concluded that the C-terminal regions are necessary and sufficient to control the stabilities of BTG1, BTG2, Tob, and Tob2 proteins.     

Crystal structure of cyclic Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin

Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chains serve as a signal for protein degradation by 26S proteasomes through its Ile44 hydrophobic patches interactions. The individual ubiquitin units of each chain are conjugated through an isopeptide bond between Lys48 and the C-terminal Gly76 of the preceding units. The conformation of Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin has been shown to change dynamically depending on solution pH. Here we enzymatically synthesized a wild-type Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin for structural study. In the synthesis, cyclic and non-cyclic species were obtained as major and minor fractions, respectively. This enabled us to solve the crystal structure of tetraubiquitin exclusively with native Lys48-linkages at 1.85 Å resolution in low pH 4.6. The crystallographic data clearly showed that the C-terminus of the first ubiquitin is conjugated to the Lys48 residue of the fourth ubiquitin. The overall structure is quite similar to the closed form of engineered tetraubiquitin at near-neutral pH 6.7, previously reported, in which the Ile44 hydrophobic patches face each other. The structure of the second and the third ubiquitin units [Ub(2)-Ub(3)] connected through a native isopeptide bond is significantly different from the conformations of the corresponding linkage of the engineered tetraubiquitins, whereas the structures of Ub(1)-Ub(2) and Ub(3)-Ub(4) isopeptide bonds are almost identical to those of the previously reported structures. From these observations, we suggest that the flexible nature of the isopeptide linkage thus observed contributes to the structural arrangements of ubiquitin chains exemplified by the pH-dependent closed-to-open conformational transition of tetraubiquitin.     

Interaction Between Syntaxin 8 and HECTd3, a HECT Domain Ligase

Ubiquitination of proteins and their degradation within the proteasome has emerged as the major proteolytic mechanism used by mammalian cells to regulate cytosolic and nuclear protein levels. Substrate ubiquitylation is mediated by ubiquitin (Ub) ligases, also called E3 Ub ligases. HECT-E3 Ub ligases are characterized by the presence of a C-terminal HECT domain that contains the active site for Ub transfer onto substrates. Among the many E3 Ub ligases, the family homologous to E6-Ap C-terminus (HECT) E3 Ub ligases, which includes the yeast protein Rsp5p and the mammalian homolog NEDD4, AIP4/Itch, and Smurf, has been shown to ubiquitylate membrane proteins and, in some instances, to induce their degradation. In this report, we have identified Syntaxin 8 as a binding protein to a novel HECT domain protein, HECT domain containing 3 (HECTd3), by yeast two-hybrid screen. Besides HECT domain, HECTd3 contains an anaphase-promoting complex, subunit 10 (APC10) domain. Our co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that Syntaxin 8 directly interacts with HECTd3 and that the overexpression of HECTd3 promotes the ubiquitination of Syntaxin 8. Immunofluorescence results show that Syntaxin 8 and HECTd3 have similar subcellular localization.     

A plant‐specific in vitro ubiquitination analysis system

Protein ubiquitination requires the concerted action of three enzymes: ubiquitin‐activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3). These ubiquitination enzymes belong to an abundant protein family that is encoded in all eukaryotic genomes. Describing their biochemical characteristics is an important part of their functional analysis. It has been recognized that various E2/E3 specificities exist, and that detection of E3 ubiquitination activity in vitro may depend on the recruitment of E2s. Here, we describe the development of an in vitro ubiquitination system based on proteins encoded by genes from Arabidopsis. It includes most varieties of Arabidopsis E2 proteins, which are tested with several RING‐finger type E3 ligases. This system permits determination of E3 activity in combination with most of the E2 sub‐groups that have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome. At the same time, E2/E3 specificities have also been explored. The components used in this system are all from plants, particularly Arabidopsis, making it very suitable for ubiquitination assays of plant proteins. Some E2 proteins that are not easily expressed in Escherichia coli were transiently expressed and purified from plants before use in ubiquitination assays. This system is also adaptable to proteins of species other than plants. In this system, we also analyzed two mutated forms of ubiquitin, K48R and K63R, to detect various types of ubiquitin conjugation.     

Enhancement of BRCA1 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity through direct interaction with the BARD1 protein

The breast and ovarian cancer-specific tumor suppressor RING finger protein BRCA1 has been identified as an E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase through in vitro studies, which demonstrated that its RING finger domain can autoubiquitylate and monoubiquitylate histone H2A when supplied with Ub, E1, and UBC4 (E2). Here we report that the E3 ligase activity of the N-terminal 110 amino acid residues of BRCA1, which encodes a stable domain containing the RING finger, as well as that of the full-length BRCA1, was significantly enhanced by the BARD1 protein (residues 8-142), whose RING finger domain itself lacked Ub ligase activity in vitro. The results of mutagenesis studies indicate that the enhancement of BRCA1 E3 ligase activity by BARD1 depends on direct interaction between the two proteins. Using K48A and K63A Ub mutants, we found that BARD1 stimulated the formation of both Lys(48)- and Lys(63)-linked poly-Ub chains. However, the enhancement of BRCA1 autoubiquitylation by BARD1 mostly resulted in poly-Ub chains linked through Lys(63), which could potentially activate biological pathways other than BRCA1 degradation. We also found that co-expression of BRCA1 and BARD1 in living cells increased the abundance and stability of both proteins and that this depended on their ability to heterodimerize.     

Molecular and structural insight into lysine selection on substrate and ubiquitin lysine 48 by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34

The attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) to lysines on substrates or itself by ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes results in protein ubiquitination. Lysine selection is important for generating diverse substrate-Ub structures and targeting proteins to different fates; however, the mechanisms of lysine selection are not clearly understood. The positioning of lysine(s) toward the E2/E3 active site and residues proximal to lysines are critical in their selection. We investigated determinants of lysine specificity of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34, toward substrate and Ub lysines. Evaluation of the relative importance of different residues positioned −2, −1, +1 and +2 toward ubiquitination of its substrate, Sic1, on lysine 50 showed that charged residues in the −1 and −2 positions negatively impact on ubiquitination. Modeling suggests that charged residues at these positions alter the native salt-bridge interactions in Ub and Cdc34, resulting in misplacement of Sic1 lysine 50 in the Cdc34 catalytic cleft. During polyubiquitination, Cdc34 showed a strong preference for Ub lysine 48 (K48), with lower activity towards lysine 11 (K11) and lysine 63 (K63). Mutating the −2, −1, +1 and +2 sites surrounding K11 and K63 to mimic those surrounding K48 did not improve their ubiquitination, indicating that further determinants are important for Ub K48 specificity. Modeling the ternary structure of acceptor Ub with the Cdc34~Ub complex as well as in vitro ubiquitination assays unveiled the importance of K6 and Q62 of acceptor Ub for Ub K48 polyubiquitination. These findings provide molecular and structural insight into substrate lysine and Ub K48 specificity by Cdc34.     

β-Sheet Augmentation Is a Conserved Mechanism of Priming HECT E3 Ligases for Ubiquitin Ligation

Ubiquitin (Ub) ligases (E3s) catalyze the attachment of Ub chains to target proteins and thereby regulate a wide array of signal transduction pathways in eukaryotes. In HECT-type E3s, Ub first forms a thioester intermediate with a strictly conserved Cys in the C-lobe of the HECT domain and is then ligated via an isopeptide bond to a Lys residue in the substrate or a preceding Ub in a poly-Ub chain. To date, many key aspects of HECT-mediated Ub transfer have remained elusive. Here, we provide structural and functional insights into the catalytic mechanism of the HECT-type ligase Huwe1 and compare it to the unrelated, K63-specific Smurf2 E3, a member of the Nedd4 family. We found that the Huwe1 HECT domain, in contrast to Nedd4-family E3s, prioritizes K6- and K48-poly-Ub chains and does not interact with Ub in a non-covalent manner. Despite these mechanistic differences, we demonstrate that the architecture of the C-lobe ~ Ub intermediate is conserved between Huwe1 and Smurf2 and involves a reorientation of the very C-terminal residues. Moreover, in Nedd4 E3s and Huwe1, the individual sequence composition of the Huwe1 C-terminal tail modulates ubiquitination activity, without affecting thioester formation. In sum, our data suggest that catalysis of HECT ligases hold common features, such as the β-sheet augmentation that primes the enzymes for ligation, and variable elements, such as the sequence of the HECT C-terminal tail, that fine-tune ubiquitination activity and may aid in determining Ub chain specificity by positioning the substrate or acceptor Ub.     

Modulation of K11-linkage formation by variable loop residues within UbcH5A

Ubiquitination refers to the covalent addition of ubiquitin (Ub) to substrate proteins or other Ub molecules via the sequential action of three enzymes (E1, E2, and E3). Recent advances in mass spectrometry proteomics have made it possible to identify and quantify Ub linkages in biochemical and cellular systems. We used these tools to probe the mechanisms controlling linkage specificity for UbcH5A. UbcH5A is a promiscuous E2 enzyme with an innate preference for forming polyubiquitin chains through lysine 11 (K11), lysine 48 (K48), and lysine 63 (K63) of Ub. We present the crystal structure of a noncovalent complex between Ub and UbcH5A. This structure reveals an interaction between the Ub surface flanking K11 and residues adjacent to the E2 catalytic cysteine and suggests a possible role for this surface in formation of K11 linkages. Structure-guided mutagenesis, in vitro ubiquitination and quantitative mass spectrometry have been used to characterize the ability of residues in the vicinity of the E2 active site to direct synthesis of K11- and K63-linked polyubiquitin. Mutation of critical residues in the interface modulated the linkage specificity of UbcH5A, resulting in generation of more K63-linked chains at the expense of K11-linkage synthesis. This study provides direct evidence that the linkage specificity of E2 enzymes may be altered through active-site mutagenesis.     

植物泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径研究进展

泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径是最重要的,有高度选择性的蛋白质降解途径,由泛素激活酶、泛素结合酶、泛素蛋白连接酶和26S蛋白酶体组成,参与调控植物生长发育的多个方面。泛素蛋白酶体途径参与植物体内的众多生理过程,如植物激素信号,光形态建成、自交不亲和反应和细胞周期等。本文就泛素/26S蛋白酶体途径以及在植物生长发育中的作用的研究近况做一综述。     

The role of atypical ubiquitination in cell regulation

Ubiquitination is a type of intracellular proteins post-translational modification (PTM) characterized by covalent attachment of ubiquitin molecules to target proteins. This includes monoubiquitination (attachment of one ubiquitin molecule), multiple monoubiquitination also known as multiubiquitination (attachment of several monomeric ubiquitin molecules to a target protein), and polyubiquitination (attachment of ubiquitin chains consisting of several, most frequently four ubiquitin monomers to a target protein). In the case of polyubiquitination, linear or branched polyubiquitin chains are formed. Their formation involves various lysine residues of monomeric ubiquitin. The best studied is Lys48-linked polyubiquitination, which targets proteins for proteasomal degradation. In this review we have considered examples of so-called atypical polyubiquitination, which mainly involves other lysine residues (Lys6, Lys11, Lys27, Lys29, Lys33, Lys63) and also N-terminal methionine. The considered examples convincingly demonstrate that polyubiquitination of proteins (not necessarily) targets proteins for their proteolytic degradation in proteasomes. Atypically polyubiquitinated proteins are involved in regulation of various processes including immune response, genome stability, signal transduction, etc. Alterations of ubiquitination machinery is crucial for development of serious diseases.     

Regulating the Regulators: Recent Revelations in the Control of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases

Since its discovery as a post-translational signal for protein degradation, our understanding of ubiquitin (Ub) has vastly evolved. Today, we recognize that the role of Ub signaling is expansive and encompasses diverse processes including cell division, the DNA damage response, cellular immune signaling, and even organismal development. With such a wide range of functions comes a wide range of regulatory mechanisms that control the activity of the ubiquitylation machinery. Ub attachment to substrates occurs through the sequential action of three classes of enzymes, E1s, E2s, and E3s. In humans, there are 2 E1s, ∼35 E2s, and hundreds of E3s that work to attach Ub to thousands of cellular substrates. Regulation of ubiquitylation can occur at each stage of the stepwise Ub transfer process, and substrates can also impact their own modification. Recent studies have revealed elegant mechanisms that have evolved to control the activity of the enzymes involved. In this minireview, we highlight recent discoveries that define some of the various mechanisms by which the activities of E3-Ub ligases are regulated.     

Detection and characterization of the in vitro e3 ligase activity of the human MID1 protein

Human MID1 (midline-1) is a microtubule-associated protein that is postulated to target the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A for degradation. It binds alpha4 that then recruits the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A. As a member of the TRIM (tripartite motif) family, MID1 has three consecutive zinc-binding domains—RING (really interesting new gene), Bbox1, and Bbox2—that have similar ββα-folds. Here, we describe the in vitro characterization of these domains individually and in tandem. We observed that the RING domain exhibited greater ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligase activity compared to the Bbox domains. The amount of autopolyubiquitinated products with RING-Bbox1 and RING-Bbox1-Bbox2 domains in tandem was significantly greater than those of the individual domains. However, no polyubiquitinated products were observed for the Bbox1-Bbox domains in tandem. Using mutants of Ub, we observed that these MID1 domain constructs facilitate Ub chain elongation via Lys63 of Ub. In addition, we observed that the high-molecular-weight protein products were primarily due to polyubiquitination at one site (Lys154) on the Bbox1 domain of the RING-Bbox1 and RING-Bbox1-Bbox2 constructs. We observed that MID1 E3 domains could interact with multiple E2-conjugating enzymes. Lastly, a 45-amino-acid peptide derived from the C-terminus of alpha4 that binds tightly to Bbox1 was observed to be monoubiquitinated in the assay and appears to down-regulate the amount of polyubiquitinated products formed. These studies shed light on MID1 E3 ligase activity and show how its three zinc-binding domains can contribute to MID1's overall function.     

Why do cellular proteins linked to K63-polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?

Although cellular proteins conjugated to K48‐linked Ub chains are targeted to proteasomes, proteins conjugated to K63‐ubiquitin chains are directed to lysosomes. However, pure 26S proteasomes bind and degrade K48‐ and K63‐ubiquitinated substrates similarly. Therefore, we investigated why K63‐ubiquitinated proteins are not degraded by proteasomes. We show that mammalian cells contain soluble factors that selectively bind to K63 chains and inhibit or prevent their association with proteasomes. Using ubiquitinated proteins as affinity ligands, we found that the main cellular proteins that associate selectively with K63 chains and block their binding to proteasomes are ESCRT0 (Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport) and its components, STAM and Hrs. In vivo, knockdown of ESCRT0 confirmed that it is required to block binding of K63‐ubiquitinated molecules to the proteasome. In addition, the Rad23 proteins, especially hHR23B, were found to bind specifically to K48‐ubiquitinated proteins and to stimulate proteasome binding. The specificities of these proteins for K48‐ or K63‐ubiquitin chains determine whether a ubiquitinated protein is targeted for proteasomal degradation or delivered instead to the endosomal‐lysosomal pathway.     

E3 ubiquitin ligases as regulators of membrane protein trafficking and degradation

Ubiquitination is a regulated post-translational modification that conjugates ubiquitin (Ub) to lysine residues of target proteins and determines their intracellular fate. The canonical role of ubiquitination is to mediate degradation by the proteasome of short-lived cytoplasmic proteins that carry a single, polymeric chain of Ub on a specific lysine residue. However, protein modification by Ub has much broader and diverse functions involved in a myriad of cellular processes. Monoubiquitination, at one or multiple lysine residues of transmembrane proteins, influences their stability, protein-protein recognition, activity and intracellular localization. In these processes, Ub functions as an internalization signal that sends the modified substrate to the endocytic/sorting compartments, followed by recycling to the plasma membrane or degradation in the lysosome. E3 ligases play a pivotal role in ubiquitination, because they recognize the acceptor protein and hence dictate the high specificity of the reaction. The multitude of E3s present in nature suggests their nonredundant mode of action and the need for their controlled regulation. Here we give a short account of E3 ligases that specifically modify and regulate membrane proteins. We emphasize the intricate network of interacting proteins that contribute to the substrate-E3 recognition and determine the substrate's cellular fate.