13C-urea breath test during hospitalization for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer bleeding

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of ¹³C‐urea breath test (UBT) to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding and treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methods: Patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding, and treated with omeprazole, had a first UBT performed the day after resuming oral feeding. Patients with a negative UBT during hospitalization underwent a repeated UBT 15 days after stopping PPIs. Results: The first UBT during hospitalization was positive in 86% of 131 patients. Time between admission and performance of the test was longer in patients with negative versus positive UBT (5.2 ± 0.7 versus 4.3 ± 0.5 days; p < .001). The repeated UBT became positive in 15 of 18 (83%) patients with a negative first UBT. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable associated with a negative first UBT was the time elapsed between admission and performance of the test (odds ratio = 6.6; 95%CI = 2.9–15.1). Conclusion: Most H. pylori‐positive patients with ulcer bleeding have a positive UBT (performed just after resuming oral feeding) despite previous treatment with high‐dose PPIs. Nevertheless, to preclude false‐negative results due to PPI therapy, the UBT should be performed as early as possible. If the infection cannot be demonstrated with this first UBT, H. pylori still needs to be definitively excluded with a second UBT performed after stopping PPIs.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer

Background: The most common complications of peptic ulcer are bleeding and perforation. In many regions, definitive acid reduction surgery has given way to simple closure and Helicobacter pylori eradication. Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to ask whether this change in practice is in fact justified. Materials and Methods: A search on the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, and Embase was made for controlled trials of duodenal ulcer perforation patients using simple closure method plus postoperative H. pylori eradication therapy versus simple closure plus antisecretory non‐eradication therapy. The long‐term results for prevention of ulcer recurrence were compared. Results: The pooled incidence of 1‐year ulcer recurrence in H. pylori eradication group was 5.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.7 and 9.7], which is significantly lower than that of the control group (35.2%) with 95% CI of 0.25 and 0.45. The pooled relative risk was 0.15 with 95% CI of 0.06 and 0.37. Conclusions: Helicobacter pylori eradication after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation gives better result than the operation plus antisecretory non‐eradication therapy for prevention of ulcer recurrence. All duodenal ulcer perforation patients should be tested for H. pylori infection, and eradication therapy is required in all infected patients.     

The effects of nocturnal acid breakthrough on Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background. The effects of nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB) on Helicobacter pylori eradication are still unknown in peptic ulcer patients. The purposes of this study were to compare the effect of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid) to lansoprazole 60 mg once a day (qd) on the prevalence of NAB, and to determine whether NAB affects the eradication of H. pylori in peptic ulcer patients. Methods. Experiments were carried out in 67 patients with H. pylori‐positive peptic ulcers. They were randomized into two groups, one treated with a combination of lansoprazole 60 mg, clarithromycin 1.0 g, and amoxycillin 2.0 g once a day before breakfast (qd group), and the other, divided doses of the drugs were given before breakfast and dinner (bid group) for 2 weeks. Results. NAB occurred in 31 patients, 55.2% in qd group, and 39.5% in bid group (p = .226). H. pylori eradication was achieved in 61.3% in NAB positive group and 83.3% in NAB negative group (p = .055). The mean duration of NAB for H. pylori eradication group was 99.3 ± 22.7 min, and 293.2 ± 49.8 min for H. pylori persistence group (p < .05). The median intragastric pH of the H. pylori eradication and persistence group was 5.7 ± 0.2 and 4.2 ± 0.4, respectively (p < .05). Conclusions. Neither the morning dose and the divided dose regimen of lansoprazole affected the intragastric acidity and occurrence of the NAB. NAB did not influence H. pylori eradication in peptic ulcer patients, but the duration of NAB and total intragastric median pH were found to influence the H. pylori eradication.     

An evaluation of a serologic test with a current infection marker of Helicobacter pylori before and after eradication therapy in Chinese

Background and Aims: Development of an accurate and less cumbersome noninvasive method to detect current Helicobacter pylori infection is essential in clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CIM test, also known as the Assure®H. pylori Rapid Test (Genelabs Diagnostics Pty. Ltd., Singapore), for the diagnosis of current H. pylori infection before and after eradication therapy in Chinese population. Methods: A total of 452 eligible people were recruited for this study in Jiangsu Province, China. Each individual underwent a ¹³C urea breath test (¹³C‐UBT). For the evaluation of CIM test after eradication, 115 H. pylori‐positive outpatients were treated with 1‐week triple therapy. One month after the end of therapy, the patients underwent ¹³C‐UBT again, and the CIM‐test was performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of therapy. Its performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy) were determined using the ¹³C‐UBT as a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. Results: H. pylori was detected in 221 (65.6%) of the 337 people by ¹³C‐UBT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the CIM test were 93.2%, 90.5%, 94.9%, 87.5%, and 92.3%, respectively, using ¹³C‐UBT as a gold standard. One month after eradication therapy, the sensitivity, specificity of CIM test were only 50% and 66.7%, 66.7% and 84.6% 3‐month after eradication therapy and the sensitivity, specificity increased to 85.7% and 96.9%, respectively, when CIM test was used 6 months after the end of anti‐H. pylori therapy. Conclusions: The CIM test is a simple, rapid, accurate, cheap, and near‐people test. It may be satisfactory for detecting H. pylori infection in cases without eradication therapy, but it could not differentiate the past or current infection correctly within 6 months after anti‐H. pylori therapy.     

Normalization of phospholipids concentration of the gastric mucosa was observed in patients with peptic ulcer after eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background. Phospholipids concentration in the gastric mucosa decreased in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of eradication of H. pylori on decreasing the phospholipids concentration in the gastric mucosa in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer. Materials and Methods. Phospholipids (phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and sphingonomyeline) were measured in biopsy specimens from the antrum and corpus using thin‐layer chromatography. In H. pylori positive patients with gastric ulcer (n = 26) and duodenal ulcer (n = 13), and H. pylori negative controls (n = 20), the biopsy specimens were obtained before and 3 months after eradication. Eradication was performed using lansoprazole, amoxycillin, and clarithromycin. Results. Compared with the H. pylori negative control group, the concentrations of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine decreased significantly in the gastric ulcer group in both antrum and corpus mucosa, and in the duodenal ulcer group in antrum mucosa. This decrease returned to the control level after eradication. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the eradication of H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcer normalized the decrease of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in the gastric mucosa.     

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

Background and Aims: To assess the validity of biopsy‐based tests (histology, culture, and urease test) and serology in detecting current H. pylori infection for the peptic ulcer patients who had gastric bleeding. Methods: A total of 398 peptic ulcer patients were enrolled and divided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of bleeding. The diagnosis for current H. pylori infection was verified using the gold standard combining individual H. pylori tests. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the culture, Campylobacter‐like organism (CLO) test (urease test), histology, and serology were compared. Results: Of the total study population (N = 398), 157 (39.4%) patients were categorized into the bleeding group. The sensitivities of the culture (40.0%) and CLO (85.0%) in the bleeding group were significantly lower than culture (58.1%) and CLO (96.4%) in the nonbleeding group (p = .012 and p < .001, respectively). In the bleeding group, the sensitivity of CLO (85.0%) was significantly lower than histology (92.5%) and serology (97.4%) (p = .013 and p = .002, respectively), which was not found in the nonbleeding group. The specificity of serology in the bleeding group (56.3%) was significantly lower than that of nonbleeding group (74.2%) (p = .038). Similarly, the specificity of serology was significantly lower than the other H. pylori tests in the bleeders. Conclusions: Bleeding decreased the sensitivity of H. pylori tests in patients with peptic ulcer, especially in urease test or culture. In contrast, histology was found to be a quite reliable test, regardless of the presence of bleeding.     

Recurrent peptic ulcers in patients following successful Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicenter study of 4940 patients

Objective. Although curative treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection markedly reduces the relapse of peptic ulcers, the details of the ulcers that do recur is not well characterized. The aim of this study is to describe the recurrence rate and specific features of peptic ulcers after cure of H. pylori infection. Methods. This was a multicenter study involving 4940 peptic ulcer patients who were H. pylori negative after successful eradication treatment and were followed for up to 48 months. The annual incidence of ulcer relapse in H. pylori‐cured patients, background of patients with relapsed ulcers, time to relapse, ulcer size, and site of relapsed ulcers were investigated. Results. Crude peptic ulcer recurrence rate was 3.02% (149/4940). The annual recurrence rates of gastric, duodenal and gastroduodenal ulcer were 2.3%, 1.6%, and 1.6%, respectively. Exclusion of patients who took NSAIDs led annual recurrence rates to 1.9%, 1.5% and 1.3%, respectively. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in gastric ulcer. Recurrence rates of patients who smoked, consumed alcohol, and used NSAIDs were significantly higher in those with gastric ulcer recurrence compared to duodenal ulcer recurrence (e.g. 125 of 149 [83.9%] relapsed ulcers recurred at the same or adjacent sites as the previous ulcers). Conclusions. Curative treatment of H. pylori infection is useful in preventing ulcer recurrence. Gastric ulcer is more likely to relapse than duodenal ulcer. Recurrent ulcer tended to recur at the site of the original ulcers.     

Increased primary resistance to recommended antibiotics negatively affects Helicobacter pylori eradication

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of two commonly employed treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection and the impact of bacterial resistance to antibiotics on eradication rate. Methods. Ninety‐two consecutive H. pylori‐positive patients with active peptic ulcer disease were randomly enrolled to receive a 7‐day treatment with either lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg [all twice a day (b.i.d.), Group A, n = 46]; or bismuth subcitrate 125 mg four times a day (q.i.d.) plus tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d and furazolidone 200 mg b.i.d. (Group B, n = 46) H. pylori status was reassessed 30 days after completion of the therapy and bacterial resistance to the antibiotics was investigated using an in vitro assay. Results. Five patients from each study group were lost to follow up. Both treatments resulted in similar H. pylori eradication rate: 66–60% (per protocol), 59–52% (intention‐to‐treat) in Groups A and B, respectively (non significant). However, eradication improved to 79% in the absence of H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin. Conclusion. Primary resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin may underscore a potentially serious problem for the eradication of H. pylori infection. Testing for bacterial resistance may become necessary to improve therapeutic efficacy.     

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background and Aims: Helicobacter pylori infection appears to be a protective factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, H. pylori is associated with the subtype of esophageal carcinoma, and long‐term proton‐pump inhibition usage would cause gastric atrophy in patients with persistent H. pylori infection, which is a precancerous lesion. The relationship between H. pylori infection and GERD is still unclear. We aimed to confirm whether the eradication of H. pylori would worsen or improve symptomatic or endoscopic GERD. Methods: A systematic review of the published data was undertaken, and a meta‐analysis was performed to determine the effect of H. pylori eradication on the occurrence of symptomatic (heartburn, acid regurgitation) and endoscopically proven erosive (esophagitis) GERD in patients with or without pre‐existing GERD. Results: A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria and thus were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in the frequency of symptomatic or endoscopically proven erosive GERD after the eradication between patients with H. pylori eradicated and those with persistent infection, regardless of follow‐up period, location, or the baseline disease. Conclusion: H. pylori eradication does not aggravate the clinical outcomes in terms of short‐term and long‐term posteradication occurrence of GERD. There is no association between H. pylori eradication and the development of GERD in the patients with different diseases, even those with GERD.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric acid secretion and meal-stimulated serum gastrin in children

Background. Comparative studies of gastric acid secretion in children related to Helicobacter pylori infection are lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare acid secretion and meal‐stimulated gastrin in relation to H. pylori infection among pediatric patients. Materials and Methods. Thirty‐six children aged 10–17 years (17 with H. pylori infection) undergoing diagnostic endoscopy participated in the study. Diagnoses included gastritis only (n = 23), duodenal ulcer (n = 5) and normal histology (n = 8). Gastric acid output was studied using the endoscopic gastric secretion test before and 2–3 months after H. pylori eradication. Meal‐stimulated serum gastrin response was assessed before and 12 months after eradication. Results. H. pylori gastritis was typically antrum‐predominant. Acid secretion was greater in H. pylori‐positive patients with duodenal ulcer than in gastritis‐only patients or controls [mean ± standard error (SE): 6.56 ± 1.4, 3.11 ± 0.4 and 2.65 ± 0.2 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p < .001]. Stimulated acid secretion was higher in H. pylori‐positive boys than girls (5.0 ± 0.8 vs. 2.51 ± 0.4 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p < .05). Stimulated acid secretion pre‐ and post‐H. pylori eradication was similar (5.47 ± 0.8 vs. 4.67 ± 0.9 mEq/10 minutes, respectively; p = .21). Increased basal and meal‐stimulated gastrin release reversed following H. pylori eradication (e.g. basal from 134 to 46 pg/ml, p < .001 and peak from 544 to 133 pg/ml, p < .05). Conclusions. H. pylori infection in children is associated with a marked but reversible increase in meal‐stimulated serum gastrin release. Gastric acid hypersecretion in duodenal ulcer remains after H. pylori eradication, suggesting that the host factor plays a critical role in outcome of the infection.     

Rank order of success favors longer duration of imidazole-based therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: a randomized pilot study

Background. Studies on eradication therapy in developing countries have shown a success rate of 70–85%, which is suboptimal. Duration of therapy may be an important factor dictating eradication success in such regions. Aim. The study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of increasing the treatment period on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease. Methods. A randomized trial was carried out in which 64 consecutive H. pylori‐infected patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled. The patients were randomized to one of the three trial arms. Therapy consisted of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), amoxycillin 1 g b.i.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. The treatment period was 1 week in group I, 2 weeks in group II and 3 weeks in group III. At inclusion, patients underwent endoscopy and the presence of H. pylori was documented by a positive urease test and C14 urea breath test. Four weeks after completion of eradication therapy, the patients were subjected to repeat endoscopy to assess ulcer healing and tests for H. pylori infection. Results. Sixty‐four patients (55 male and nine female; mean age 35.5 years) were enrolled in each group. The H. pylori eradication rate for group I (1 week of therapy) was 47.6%, that for group II (2 weeks of therapy) was 80%, and that for group III (3 weeks of therapy) was 91.3% (p = .003). The ulcer healing rates were 71.4, 80 and 95.6% in groups I, II and III, respectively (p = .09). Conclusion. The 3‐week regimen significantly improved the eradication rate as compared with the 1‐week regime. Increasing the duration of therapy significantly improved the chances of eradication of H. pylori in duodenal ulcer disease.     

Low efficacy of clarithromycin including sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) appears to achieve a better eradication rate than triple therapy. However, most of the data have been reported from the Italy, and studies from different population are needed before it is recommended in clinical practice. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two separate clarithromycin including sequential regimens in Turkey which is well known with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance to H. pylori. Methods: Consecutive H. pylori ‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were randomly allocated to one of the two sequential regimens; the first group was given lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for the first week, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for the second week (LA‐CM). The second arm was given the same regimen but tetracycline500 g q.i.d. instead of metronidazole (LA‐CT). H. pylori was detected with urea breath test (UBT) and histology before enrollment. UBT was repeated at 6th weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in groups and 179 of them completed their protocols. The cumulative per protocol (“PP”) and intention‐to‐treat (“ITT”) eradication rates were 74.3% and 66.5% in all patients, respectively. Both “PP” (78.2% vs 70.1%) and “ITT” (72% vs 61%) eradication rates were better in LA‐CT group than LA‐CM group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was comparable. Conclusion: Two weeks clarithromycin including sequential regimens with metronidazole or tetracycline were not achieved acceptable eradication rates in Turkey.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection reduces the incidence of peptic ulcer disease in patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis

Aim: To investigate the association between use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and Helicobacter pylori infection, interactive effect of H. pylori infection and NSAID use on the development of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on PUD development. Material and Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in EMBASE and PubMed for relevant articles published in English between January 1989 and August 2010, with the following MeSH and/or key words: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs, Helicobacter pylori, or H. pylori, peptic ulcer disease or PUD, and randomized‐control study or clinical trial. The meta‐analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 4.2.2. Results: In the analysis of five studies, the pooled prevalence of H. pylori infection was 74.5% and 71.1% in NSAID users and non‐NSAID users, respectively, (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.35–1.20, p = .170). In the analysis of nine studies, the pooled prevalence of PUD in NSAID users was 31.2% and 17.9% in the presence and absence of H. pylori infection, respectively, (OR = 3.08; 95% CI: 1.26–7.55, p = .010). Moreover, in the analysis of seven studies, PUD developed in 6.4% and 11.8% of NSAID users with and without eradication therapy, respectively (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36–0.74, p < .001). The preventive effect of the eradication therapy was further revealed in NSAID‐naive users (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14–0.49, p < .0001) and in the Asian population (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16–0.56, p < .001). Conclusion: NSAID use is not associated with H. pylori infection in patients with PUD. PUD is more common in H. pylori positive than in negative NSAID users. Moreover, H. pylori eradication therapy reduces PUD incidence in NSAID users, especially in naive users and in the Asian population.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori by 7-day triple-therapy regimens combining pantoprazole with clarithromycin, metronidazole, or amoxicillin in patients with peptic ulcer disease: results of two double-blind, randomized studies

Aim. To compare the short‐term (7‐day) safety and efficacy of two triple‐therapy regimens using pantoprazole with those of two dual‐therapy regimens (one with pantoprazole and one without), for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Methods. H. pylori infection was identified by rapid urease (CLOtest), and confirmed by histology and culture. Patients were enrolled into one of two randomized, double‐blind, multicenter, parallel‐group studies. In study A, patients received oral pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg (PCM); pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin 1000 mg (PCA); or pantoprazole and clarithromycin (PC). In study B, patients received PCM, PCA, PC, or clarithromycin and metronidazole without pantoprazole (CM). Treatments were given twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori status after therapy was assessed by histology and culture at 4 weeks after completing the course of study treatment. Modified intent‐to‐treat (MITT; each study: n = 424, n = 512) and per‐protocol (PP; each study: n = 371, n = 454) populations were analyzed. The MITT population comprised all patients whose positive H. pylori status was confirmed by culture and histology; the PP population comprised patients who also complied with ≥ 85% of study medication doses. Results. A total of 1016 patients were enrolled. Cure rates among patients with clarithromycin‐susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 86% for PCM, and 72 and 71% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. Cure rates among patients with metronidazole‐susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 87% for PCM, and 71 and 69% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. The combined eradication rates observed with the PCM regimen were superior to those of all other regimens tested. Side‐effects were infrequent and mild. Conclusions. PCM had the highest overall eradication rate in these two studies examining 7‐day treatment regimens. All regimens were safe and well tolerated.     

Evaluation of a four-drug, three-antibiotic, nonbismuth-containing "concomitant" therapy as first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Greece

Background: The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with standard treatments are decreasing worldwide as in Greece. Studies with new antibiotic combinations are needed to find better methods of eradication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of a 10‐day, four‐drug, three‐antibiotic, nonbismuth–containing concomitant regimen. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, open‐label, multicenter study that included 131 patients infected with H. pylori. All patients were diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease or nonulcer dyspepsia by endoscopy. H. pylori infection was established by at least two positive tests among rapid urease test, gastric histology, and ¹³C‐urea breath test. For 10 days, all patients received esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxycillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all b.d. eradication was assessed with ¹³C urea breath test 8 weeks after the start of treatment. Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates were determined. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven of the 131 patients completed the study. At intention‐to‐treat analysis, the eradication rate was 91.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.5–95.7%). For the per‐protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 94.5% (95% CI, 89–97.8%). Adverse events were noted in 42 of 131 (32.1%); drug compliance was excellent with 96.9% of the patients taking more than 90% of the prescribed medication. Conclusion: A 10‐day concomitant regimen appears to be an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated treatment option for first‐line H. pylori eradication in Greece.     

Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcer Disease Reduces Medical Costs in the Community

Background: Eradicating Helicobacter pylori markedly reduces ulcer recurrence in patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Many decision analysis studies have concluded that eradicating H. pylori in PUD patients is more cost‐effective than maintaining antisecretory therapy. In 1995, we introduced an H. pylori eradication program into a large transportation company that experienced increased incidences of PUD among its employees along with increased medical costs, and we performed trend analysis of the actual medical costs of PUD in this cohort. Methods: In this cohort, there were approximately 8500 employees. H. pylori‐positive PUD patients were identified at the annual health check up. The patients received eradication therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. After eradication, the patients were followed up by a yearly health check up. The annual number of patients who received eradication was recorded, and the annual direct medical costs of PUD therapy were analyzed. Results: A total of 440 H. pylori‐positive PUD patients received eradication therapy in a 7‐year period. Based on an intention‐to‐treat analysis, the eradication rate was 84.5% (372 of 440). The largest number of patients who received eradication therapy was found in 1995 (n = 115), and from 1995 to 2001 this number decreased yearly by 12.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 5 to 20). Between 1989 and 1995, the annual medical costs arising of PUD therapy increased by ¥2.25 million (95% CI: 1.19 to 3.31) per year, being highest (¥22.75 million) in 1995. Between 1995 and 2001, the costs decreased by ¥3.88 million (95% CI: 3.16 to 4.59) per year. The cost in 2001 was 5.7% of the cost in 1995. The eradication program was terminated in 2001 because the prevalence of PUD diminished markedly, and the associated medical costs decreased as well. Conclusions: H. pylori eradication could reduce the number of PUD patients and associated medical costs in the workplace setting.     

Interactions Among Gastric Somatostatin, Interleukin-8 and Mucosal Inflammation in Helicobacter pylori-Positive Peptic Ulcer Patients

Background. To investigate whether Helicobacter pylori infection, but not drugs, affects gastric somatostatin, interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), histological inflammation through eradication therapy, and interactions among these parameters. Methods. Twenty‐eight H. pylori‐positive patients (21 males; mean age 47.0 years) with either gastric ulcer (GU: n = 11) or duodenal ulcer (n = 17) diagnosed endoscopically were treated with dual therapy. Eradication was defined as negative microbiologic tests and ¹³C‐urea breath test. Levels of antral and gastric juice somatostatin and mucosal IL‐8 were measured by radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Histology was assessed by the Sydney system. Results. H. pylori was eradicated in 15 patients (10 males, 6 GU) out of 28 (54%). The patients’ backgrounds did not affect the eradication of H. pylori. Successes in eradication significantly increased antral and juice somatostatin contents, and dramatically decreased IL‐8 levels and histological gastritis. In contrast, persistent H. pylori infection did not affect somatostatin and histological gastritis. An inverse correlation was present between changes in somatostatin levels and histological activity. No relationship was observed in changed values between antral somatostatin and IL‐8. Conclusions. These results indicate that eradication of H. pylori, but not the drugs used, induced an increase in somatostatin levels in the antrum and gastric juice, suggesting a close relationship between H. pylori and gastric somatostatin regulation. A close correlation between an increase in gastric somatostatin levels and the normalization of histological activity was present, suggesting that certain peptide‐immune interactions in the gastric mucosa exist in H. pylori infection.     

What To Do About Helicobacter pylori? A Decision Analysis of its Implication on Public Health

Objectives. Public health measures to eradicate Helicobacter pylori in the general population may prevent the occurrence of nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD), peptic ulcer (PUD) and gastric cancer, but may at the same time increase the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A decision analysis is carried out to quantify the counteracting influences of H. pylori and resolve the controversy about a public policy to eliminate H. pylori from the general population. Methods. A compartment model is structured to analyze the jointly beneficial and adverse effects of H. pylori. Gastric acid, H. pylori infection, and other pathophysiological mechanisms influence the occurrence of reflux disease, peptic ulcer and dyspepsia, which all contribute to the occurrence of upper abdominal symptoms. Each influence is modeled as a separate compartment with various connections to other compartments. The simulation is carried out on an electronic spreadsheet. Results. A decision in favor or against eradication of all H. pylori depends primarily on the relative contribution of reflux disease vs. peptic ulcer and dyspepsia to upper abdominal symptoms in the general population. If reflux‐related symptoms contribute twice more than peptic ulcer plus dyspepsia to the overall occurrence of abdominal symptoms, a strategy to eradicate H. pylori would actually lower rather than raise public health. Below this threshold such strategy may improve general well‐being. In the individual patient infected with H. pylori, it remains beneficial to eradicate H. pylori, irrespective of the symptoms’ nature. Conclusions. Although it is advisable to treat H. pylori infection in the individual patient who comes to medical attention, a general policy directed towards complete elimination of H. pylori from the population would not be beneficial. A compartment model provides a simple yet powerful method to assess complex disease behavior.     

The role of abdominal CT scan as follow-up after complete remission with successful Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with H. pylori-positive stage I(E1) gastric MALT lymphoma

Background: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with antibiotics is the established initial treatment of patients with localized gastric mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, there are few reports on follow‐up modalities to identify sustained remission in patients who achieve complete remission (CR). We therefore investigated the role of abdominal computed tomography (CT) as follow‐up after CR with H. pylori eradication. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with H. pylori‐positive stage I_E1 gastric MALT lymphoma who achieved CR with successful H. pylori eradication. Results: The median follow‐up after CR was 35 months (range 3–140months). At a median of 17 months (range 12–21 months) after CR, 7 of 122 patients (5.7%) experienced lymphoma recurrence, all cases of which were confined to the gastric mucosa and were detectable only by endoscopy with multiple biopsies. At the time of recurrence, four of seven patients showed re‐infection by H. pylori. Eradication therapy was successful in these patients, resulting in both bacterial eradication and tumor regression. Three patients who experienced histologic recurrence without H. pylori re‐infection were observed by a watch and wait strategy and again achieved CR. Conclusions: None of the patients with H. pylori‐positive stage I_E1 gastric MALT lymphoma who experienced tumor recurrence after CR with successful H. pylori eradication showed recurrence at extragastric sites, including lymph nodes without gastric mucosal lesion. These findings indicate that endoscopic biopsies without abdominal CT scans are sufficient to detect recurrence in these patients.     

Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer in South Korea: incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics

Background and Aim: It is difficult to determine the exact incidence rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection‐negative gastric cancer (HPIN‐GC) because H. pylori detection rates decrease with the progression of gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics of HPIN‐GC in South Korea. Methods: Helicobacter pylori infection status was evaluated by histology, a rapid urease test (CLO test), culturing, serology, and history of H. pylori eradication for 627 patients with gastric cancer. Current H. pylori infection was defined as positive results from histology, the CLO test, and culturing. Previous H. pylori infection was defined as negative in all three biopsy‐based tests and positive serology or history of H. pylori eradication. Patients were considered to be negative for H. pylori infection if all results from five methods were negative. However, patients who were found to have severe gastric atrophy by the serum pepsinogen test or metaplastic gastric atrophy by histology were assumed to have had a previous H. pylori infection even if results from other tests for H. pylori infection were all negative. Results: The number of patients with gastric cancer with current or previous H. pylori infection was 439 (70.0%) and 154 (24.6%), respectively. The rate of HPIN‐GC occurrence was 5.4% (n = 34). Sex, age, Lauren type, location of the tumor, and treatment modalities were not different according to H. pylori infection status. However, HPIN‐GC had a more advanced pT classification (T3/T4; 51.9 vs 31.1%, p = .025) and a more advanced stage (more than stage I; 63 vs 41.3%, p = .027) than H. pylori‐positive gastric cancer. Conclusion: At least 5.4% cases of gastric cancer were H. pylori negative among South Korean patients. HPIN‐GC looks like to have a poorer prognosis than H. pylori‐positive cases.