啮齿动物对印度栲种子扩散的效率

从2007 年11 月到2009 年11 月,在西双版纳热带雨林中选取三棵母树,在每棵树下每年释放标记印度栲种子200 粒(三年共计1 800 粒),并追踪其命运。通过调查啮齿动物搬运和分散贮藏印度栲种子的比例,以及
查贮藏种子的微生境、贮藏点大小和扩散距离,分析贮藏种子的存活情况,进而评估啮齿动物对印度栲种子扩散的效率。结果表明,啮齿动物搬运了69.3% 的印度栲种子,被搬运的种子中18% 被分散贮藏。所有被分散贮藏的种子均被埋于落叶下或埋于土壤表层,并且大部分贮藏点仅含一粒种子。种子的扩散距离从0.5 m 到43.8 m,平均距离为7.1 m,扩散距离在年间没有显著差异。2007 年(种子密度低,啮齿动物密度高) 没有种能最终存活到实验结束,而2008 和2009 年(种子密度高,啮齿动物密度低)分别有0.3% 和1.5% 的种子存活。研究表明,啮齿动物是印度栲有效的种子扩散者,但其扩散效率很大程度上取决于森林中种子的密度和啮齿动物的丰富度。     

鼠类对山杏和辽东栎种子的贮藏

在北京市东灵山地区,选择灌丛生境,人工释放山杏和辽东栎种子,对两种种子在释放处被鼠类就地取食、存留动态、种子被搬运和贮藏的距离、位置、状态、微生境等进行了分析比较。采用活捕饲喂和咬痕比较的方法,对野外取食山杏和辽东栎种子的鼠类进行了鉴定。结果表明：1)取食山杏和辽东栎种子的鼠类主要是大林姬鼠和岩松鼠;2)山杏种子被鼠类搬运的平均距离大于辽东栎种子,两种种子大多数被搬运至21m之内,在9m之内最为集中;3)山杏种子的中位存留时间较辽东栎种子长;4)在释放处,鼠类对辽东栎种子的就地取食强度(54．83％)大于对山杏种子的取食(0．17％);5)在搬运之后,大部分山杏种子被埋藏起来,仅有3粒被取食;而辽东栎种子大部分被取食;6)鼠类趋向于把种子搬运到灌丛下方或灌丛边缘进行贮藏或取食。山杏种子在贮藏点的数量为1—3粒,而辽东栎种子在贮藏点的数量均为1粒。     

生境类型对啮齿动物扩散和贮藏栓皮栎坚果的影响

在河南省济源市王屋山地区,研究了次生林、灌丛、退耕地三个生境中啮齿动物对栓皮栎坚果的取食、
扩散与贮藏情况。结果表明:1)在研究地区,取食栓皮栎坚果的啮齿动物主要有大林姬鼠、社鼠和黑线姬鼠;
2)在次生林中,啮齿动物对坚果的搬运速率慢于在灌丛和退耕地生境中的搬运速率;3)次生林生境中,贮藏
坚果占被扩散坚果的比例高于灌丛和退耕地,而灌丛生境中被取食坚果占被扩散种子的比例高于退耕地和次生
林;4)栓皮栎坚果的中位存留时间在三个生境间有显著性差异。研究结果提示,在人工造林时,可通过对栓皮
栎坚果进行埋藏处理,以提高种子萌发率。     

啮齿动物对六盘山区辽东栎、野李和华山松种子的取食和搬运

为了阐明不同种子投放方式和覆盖处理对啮齿动物取食和搬运/贮藏种子行为的影响,2010年春季,我们在宁夏六盘山区的辽东栎幼林,用塑料标签标记法研究了不同种子投放方式(单独投放、两两组合投放和混合投放)和覆盖处理(对照、凋落物覆盖和土壤覆盖)下啮齿动物对辽东栎、野李和华山松种子的取食和搬运特点。结果表明:(1)不同物种、不同种子投放方式和覆盖处理对种子的就地取食率、搬运后的取食率和贮藏率均具有显著影响,种子较大或具有厚而坚硬的种皮(内果皮)、组合和混合投放及覆盖处理均不同程度地促进啮齿动物对种子的搬运;(2)3种植物的种子被搬运后取食和贮藏的平均距离范围均在5.5m以内,而且种子被搬运后贮藏的距离均大于搬运后取食的距离,其中华山松种子被搬运后取食的距离显著大于辽东栎和野李种子,但搬运后的贮藏距离显著小于后两者。(3)种子被搬运后单个种子的取食点和贮藏点占多数,其他大小的取食点和贮藏点较少,种子被搬运后以土壤埋藏为主要的贮藏方式。结果表明,种子的种皮特征以及种子在群落中的分布方式和存在状态,可能通过延长啮齿动物处理的时间而增大啮齿动物的被捕食风险,使动物改变对种子的取食和搬运行为,进而决定了种子的命运。     

动物在大别山五针松种群天然更新中的作用

大别山五针松(Pinus dabeshanensis)为我国特有树种,其天然植株较少且分布范围狭窄,种群更新困难,已被列为国家二级重点保护野生植物。分别于2015年和2016年的10—12月,在目前已知最大天然种群所在地安徽岳西县河图镇大王沟,研究了大别山五针松球果与种子特征、种子雨与土壤种子库、动物对种子的取食和搬运,幼苗分布格局及其与鼠穴分布的关系,以期探明动物在其天然更新中的作用,分析其天然更新不力的原因。结果显示:大别山五针松种子败育率较高,阳坡个体球果发育情况好于阴坡;种子成熟期间没有明显的种子雨,土壤种子库也未调查到完整种子。共记录到母树与球果的访问动物6目11科16种,其中7种动物确定取食种子;地面种子摆放实验显示超过95%以上的种子被啮齿动物捕食或搬运至他处取食或贮藏,不同的摆放处理对啮齿动物的捕食、搬运没有显著影响;小林姬鼠(Apodemus sylvaticus)盗食现象严重,埋藏实验中人工贮点当夜被发现的概率在90%左右,岩松鼠(Sciurotamias davidianus)和小林姬鼠是其种子主要捕食者。研究地的大别山五针松种群于2015年和2016年分别新增一年生幼苗5株和7株,这表明大别山五针松在当地存在天然更新。幼苗多单独生长在母树周围,点格局分析显示在0—0.6 m的尺度范围内呈随机分布;在0.6 m尺度呈聚集分布。大别山五针松幼苗在小林姬鼠巢穴周边分布,其更新格局受到小林姬鼠贮点位置分布情况影响,小林姬鼠极有很可能为大别山五针松的传播者,啮齿动物对大别山五针松种子的捕食与搬运影响了大别山五针松的天然种群更新。     

啮齿动物对不同林木种子的搬运和取食微生境选择机制

不同植物种子依靠不同的方式实现扩散,啮齿动物对林木种子搬运后在取食点微生境和贮藏方式的选择存在偏好,研究其贮藏行为与微生境的关系是探究幼苗建成的关键。在秦岭中段火地塘林区,采用标签标记法,以锐齿槲栎、华山松和油松种子为材料,探究了小型啮齿动物对松栎混交林建群种种子扩散过程的影响。结果表明:1)油松种子原地取食率显著高于锐齿槲栎和华山松种子,且啮齿动物更倾向于搬运后取食(60%)和埋藏(4.33%)华山松种子,搬运后取食距离也为华山松最大(2.49 m);锐齿槲栎小种子被搬运后埋藏的距离最大(4.92 m)。2)除华山松种子外,其他类型种子被搬运后单个取食的比例均在85%以上;油松种子不存在埋藏点,而其他类型种子90%以上均以单个形式被埋藏。3)大部分种子被啮齿动物搬运后选择在裸地丢弃;锐齿槲栎大种子(87.5%)、小种子(78.57%)和华山松种子(53.33%)较大比例被啮齿动物埋藏在灌丛下方,埋藏在裸地的种子较少。4)大部分种子在灌丛下方被取食,仅华山松种子被啮齿动物搬运到洞穴取食;除油松种子被大量原地取食外,其他类型种子被搬运到取食点的种子比例基本呈现由微生境植被复杂到简单(灌丛—草丛—灌丛边缘—裸地)而逐渐减小的趋势。种子的营养价值及取食和搬运过程中啮齿动物付出的成本是影响种子命运的关键性因子,且啮齿动物对种子埋藏和取食地点的微生境存在较明显的选择性。     

济源太行山区鼠类对三种林木种子的扩散和贮藏

对取食种子的动物而言,种子的选择、扩散以及随后的处理是一个复杂的过程。为了解济源太行山区鼠类对不同种林木种子的选择和扩散策略的差异,于2011 年9 月10 日至11 月8 日,选取山杏、桃和栓皮栎3 种林木种子,将种子标记后,释放于次生林中,以5 d 间隔,调查并记录种子命运。结果表明: (1)大林姬鼠和岩松鼠是该地区主要的种子取食者和扩散者; (2)3 种种子的扩散速率明显不同,栓皮栎种子扩散速率最快(中位存留时间8. 6 d),其次为山杏种子(中位存留时间20. 9 d),桃种子扩散速率最慢(中位存留时间37. 5 d); (3)鼠类倾向于取食栓皮栎种子(55.0%) , 埋藏山杏种子(62. 0% ),但忽略桃种子(原地存留率99. 0% );(4)88. 6%的山杏和78. 8% 的栓皮栎种子被贮藏在灌丛下方、树干基部周围和石块旁边等生境中,而仅有4 3% 的山杏和9.1% 的栓皮栎种子被贮藏于裸地中;(5)鼠类将山杏种子搬运到更远(3. 4 ± 2. 1 m,mean± SE,n =63)处贮藏;而栓皮栎种子的搬运距离则相对较近(2. 5 ± 2. 4 m,n = 57)。结果显示:鼠类对不同种植物种子具有明显的取食、贮藏偏好和不同的贮藏策略。     

不同季节干旱及复水对刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量的影响

以刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)幼苗为材料,采用盆栽控水方法研究了春季、夏季和秋季干旱及旱后复水对刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量的影响.结果表明:土壤水分胁迫程度对夏季刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量影响显著,并且当土壤相对含水量低于52.16%并继续下降时可溶性糖含量迅速升高,而其对春季和秋季幼苗的可溶性糖含量影响不显著;春季和秋季不同胁迫历时处理间刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量差异不显著,而夏季土壤相对含水量为52.16%和40%处理的可溶性糖含量显著高于对照;相同水分胁迫条件下不同季节刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量总体表现为:秋季>春季>夏季.干旱复水后春季刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量持续下降,而夏季呈现先升高后降低的趋势,秋季呈现一定波动性,变化幅度不明显.研究发现,刺槐幼苗可溶性糖含量在干旱及复水调节下的变化不仅受土壤水分胁迫强度和胁迫时间的影响,也与植物所处的生长季节有密切关系.     

食物丰富度对鼠类鉴别和扩散虫蛀短柄枹栎种子的影响

时空因素和种子特征对森林鼠类扩散植物种子有着非常重要的影响。为了解食物丰富度对鼠类鉴别和扩散虫蛀种子的影响,于2012年春季(4—5月,食物匮乏季节)和2012年秋季(9—11月,食物丰盛季节),采用塑料片标记法,在秦岭南坡的佛坪国家级自然保护区内调查了森林鼠类对完好的和虫蛀的短柄枹栎Quercus glandulifera种子的扩散差异。结果显示:1)森林鼠类可以较为准确地区分完好种子和虫蛀种子。完好种子的扩散速度较快,而虫蛀种子在原地的存留时间相对较长。2)食物丰富度会对鼠类鉴别和扩散虫蛀种子产生一定的影响,但是这种影响并不显著,鼠类在春、秋季均倾向于优先取食或贮藏完好种子。3)完好种子在秋季被鼠类贮藏的比例(20%)显著高于春季(12.5%),说明种子在食物丰盛季节能够获得更大的利益。     

星鸦的贮食行为及其对红松种子的传播作用

1994－1998年秋在小兴安岭凉水自然保护区对星鸦（Nucifraga caryocatact）的贮食行为及具对红松（Pinus koraiensis）种子的传播作用进行了研究,星鸦在秋季至翌年早春主要以红松种子为食,偶食浆果。秋季种子成熟时,星鸦在取食的同时储藏大量种子作为冬季和早春的食物,这些种子中未被完全吃掉的遗留部分在第三年春天即可发芽,在地上取食部分种子后,星鸦通常储存30－50粒于舌下囊中,飞行2－5km后,将种子埋藏在土层下2.5-3.5cm深处,每个贮点从为2－4粒,贮点生境主要有8种：林缘（路边）、保护区周围空阔地、人工落叶松林、人工自冷杉林、人工红松林、人工红皮云杉林、天然更新的杨桦林和天然原始红松阔叶林（母树林）。星鸦每天至少搬运种子10次,达400粒。一个贮藏季节一只星鸦可贮藏至少16000粒种子,对红松1年生和2年生幼苗调查表明,幼苗在上述8种生境中均有分布,并且在人工落叶林、天然更新杨桦林和母树林下有幼树分布,因此星雅能有效地扩散红松种子,有利于红松的天然更新。     

Effects of habitat and season on removal and hoarding of seeds of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca) by small rodents

The wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca) is widely distributed in the Donglingshan Mountains of Mentougou District of Beijing, China, where its seeds may be an important food resource for rodents. Predation, removal and hoarding of seeds by rodents will inevitably affect the spatio-temporal pattern of seed fate of wild apricot in this area. By marking and releasing tagged seeds of wild apricot, we investigated seeds survival, scatter-hoarding, cache size and seedling establishment, and the preference of micro-habitats used by rodents to store seeds. The results showed that: (1) rodents in this area hoarded food intensively in autumn, as well as in spring and summer. (2) There were significant effects of habitat and season on removal rate of tagged seeds at releasing plots. In both two types of habitats, Low and High shrub, tagged seeds were removed most rapidly by rodents in autumn, at intermediate rates in spring and least rapidly in summer. (3) During three seasons, mean dispersal distance of scatter-hoarded seeds in Low shrub habitat was greater than that in High shrub. Most removed seeds were buried within 21.0 m of the releasing plots. (4) In both two types of habitats, Low and High shrub, rodents tended to carry seeds to US (Under shrub) and SE (Shrub edge) microhabitats for scatter-hoarding or predation. (5) Among the caches made by rodents, most caches contained only one seed, but up to three seeds were observed; caches of 2–3 seeds were common in autumn. (6) By comparing dental marks, we determined that large field mice (Apodemus peninsulae) and David’s rock squirrels (Sciurotamias davidianus) contributed to removal and predation of released tagged seeds. However, only the large field mice exerted a pivotal and positive role on the burial of dispersed seeds. (7) Establishment of three seedlings originated from seeds buried by rodents was documented in High shrub habitat.     

Scatter‐hoarding and cache pilfering of rodents in response to seed abundance

Seed caching and reciprocal cache pilferage play an important role in the coexistence of food‐hoarding animals. Understanding what affects seed caching and how cache pilferage occurs is an important question in seed dispersal ecology. However, tracking seed fate and cache pilferage presents substantial practical difficulties. Siberian chipmunks Tamias sibiricus always remove the entire pericarp when scatter‐hoarding acorns of Mongolian oak Quercus mongolica, whereas wood mice Apodemus peninsulae often store whole acorns in their caches. These differences in behavior provide an opportunity to investigate unilateral cache pilferage of T. sibiricus from A. peninsulae in response to seed abundance. In this study, tagged acorns were released at the peak and end periods of seed rain from Q. mongolica. This allowed us to investigate seed caching and unilateral cache pilferage at different seed abundances. We found that a higher proportion of acorns were cached at lower level of seed abundance (toward the end of seed rain), mainly because T. sibiricus rather than A. peninsulae scatter‐hoarded significantly more acorns at this time. Cache distances decreased with increasing seed abundance, indicating that acorns were cached further away and into smaller caches at lower seed abundance. Unexpectedly, unilateral cache pilferage by T. sibiricus was not significantly influenced by seed abundance—remaining at around 28% during both periods of high and low seed abundance.     

贮藏点深度、大小及基质含水量对花鼠找寻红松种子的影响

2012年8-10月,在黑龙江省伊春市带岭林业局东方红林场,通过人工围栏控制实验,研究了贮藏点深度、大小及基质含水量对花鼠找寻红松种子的影响。发现：(1) 埋藏深度显著影响花鼠对贮藏点的找寻率,埋藏深度为 1 cm 和 2 cm 的找寻率显著高于 4 cm 和 6 cm。(2) 埋藏点大小对花鼠发现种子也有显著影响,埋藏点越大,花鼠发现贮藏点的比例越高。(3) 高的基质含水量利于花鼠找寻贮藏点。结果表明,围栏条件下食物贮藏点深度、大小及基质含水量的改变能显著影响花鼠对贮藏点的找寻。     

Directed seed dispersal towards areas with low conspecific tree density by a scatter‐hoarding rodent

Scatter‐hoarding animals spread out cached seeds to reduce density‐dependent theft of their food reserves. This behaviour could lead to directed dispersal into areas with lower densities of conspecific trees, where seed and seedling survival are higher, and could profoundly affect the spatial structure of plant communities. We tested this hypothesis with Central American agoutis and Astrocaryum standleyanum palm seeds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. We radio‐tracked seeds as they were cached and re‐cached by agoutis, calculated the density of adult Astrocaryum trees surrounding each cache, and tested whether the observed number of trees around seed caches declined more than expected under random dispersal. Seedling establishment success was negatively dependent on seed density, and agoutis carried seeds towards locations with lower conspecific tree densities, thus facilitating the escape of seeds from natural enemies. This behaviour may be a widespread mechanism leading to highly effective seed dispersal by scatter‐hoarding animals.     

Sowing seasons and drying methods during post-harvest influence the seed vigour of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)

Experiments were conducted to study the influence of sowing seasons and drying methods on the seed vigour of two spring soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivars. Two cultivars, ‘Huachun18’ and ‘Huachun 14’, were sown in three seasons viz., spring, summer and autumn and the harvested seeds were dried using three different methods. The results showed that soybean sown in spring had a higher number of branches per plant, pods per branch and seed weight, and consequently resulted in higher seed yields than that of soybean sown in autumn or summer seasons. Seeds sown in the autumn season had the lowest values of electrical conductivity during seed imbibitions, higher peroxidase (POD) activity in germinated seedlings and lower contamination by the seed-borne fungi on the MS medium, which indirectly improved the seed vigour, which was followed by summer sown seeds. Seeds sown during the spring season resulted in poor seed vigour. In addition, the effect of drying methods on the seed vigour was also clarified. Seeds that hung for four days before threshing and then air-dried had the poorest seed vigour which was determined by germination, electrical conductivity, POD activity and seed borne fungal growth. There was no difference in seed vigour between other methods, i.e. seeds threshed directly at harvest and then air-dried on a bamboo sifter or concrete floor. These results indicated that autumn sowing soybean and the drying method in which seeds were threshed directly at harvest and then air-dried on a bamboo sifter resulted in higher seed vigour.     

Seed caching and cache pilferage by three rodent species in a temperate forest in the Xiaoxinganling Mountains

Although differences in food-hoarding tactics both reflect a behavioral response to cache pilferage among rodent species and may help explain their coexistence, differentiation in cache pilfering abilities among sympatric rodents with different hoarding strategies is seldom addressed. We carried out semi-natural enclosure experiments to investigate seed hoarding tactics among three sympatric rodent species (Tamias sibiricus, Apodemus peninsulae and Clethrionomys rufocanus) and the relationship of their pilfering abilities at the inter- and intraspecific levels. Our results showed that T. sibiricus exhibited a relatively stronger pilfering ability than A. peninsulae and C. rufocanus, as indicated by its higher recovery rate of artificial caches. Meanwhile A. peninsulae showed a medium pilfering ability and C. rufocanus displayed the lowest ability. We also noted that both cache size and cache depth significantly affected cache recovery in all three species. T. sibiricus scatter-hoarded more seeds than it larder-hoarded, A. peninsulae larder-hoarded more than scatter-hoarded, and C. rufocanus acted as a pure larder-hoarder. In T. sibiricus, individuals with lower pilfering abilities tended to scatter hoard seeds, indicating an intraspecific variation in hoarding propensity. Collectively, these results indicated that sympatric rodent species seem to deploy different food hoarding tactics that allow their coexistence in the temperate forests, suggesting a strong connection between hoarding strategy and pilfering ability.     

Interactions between a seed‐eating neotropical rodent,the Azara's agouti (Dasyprocta azarae), and the Brazilian ‘pine’ Araucaria angustifolia

We studied the seed predation and scatter‐hoarding behaviour of Azara's agoutis Dasyprocta azarae (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) in relation to the seeds of the Brazilian ‘pine’, Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae), the rodent's main winter food source. We compared seed‐removal rates, seed‐caching rates, cache distances and recovery rates between a summer period of food abundance (with a low demand for A. angustifolia seeds and no such seeds naturally available) and a winter period of food scarcity (with a high demand for A. angustifolia seeds). We investigated whether the relative seed value affected the rodent's seed‐handling behaviour. We predicted that during the high seed‐demand period (winter): (1) cache distances would be greater; (2) fewer seeds would be stored; (3) more seeds would be recovered and the seed‐recovery time would be lower. In support of our first two predictions, the caching distances were greater in winter (mean ± SE = 15.67 ± 5.11 m) than in summer (9.40 ± 1.59 m), and agoutis hoarded >9 times more seeds in summer (55) than in winter (6). Our third prediction was not supported, and the proportion of unrecovered caches and buried seed recovery times did not differ between winter (mean ± SE = 3.00 ± 0.00 days, n = 5 seeds) and summer (11.05 ± 3.68 days, n = 20 seeds). The high resource density (during summer) rather than the density of A. angustifolia seeds likely influenced seed fate. Agoutis acted mainly as predators, leaving few intact seeds, caching a low proportion of handled seeds (? 8%) and rapidly consuming the caches. Agoutis may cache seeds to keep them safe from competitors on a short‐term basis rather than maintaining medium‐ or long‐term reserves for use during food‐scarcity periods.     

Seed caching by woylies Bettongia penicillata can increase sandalwood Santalum spicatum regeneration in Western Australia

Abstract The role a small marsupial, the woylie Bettongia penicillata, might play in the recruitment and regeneration of Western Australian sandalwood Santalum spicatum through its seed caching behaviour was investigated in this study. To determine the fate of the seeds, cotton thread was attached to the seeds and the trail followed. A total of 25 seed caches were located. All of the seeds were found in separate caches, which was consistent with scatter‐hoarding behaviour. The average distance from the source of the seeds to the cache was 43.1 m ± 5.8 m at Dryandra woodland and 29.1 m ± 3.8 m at Karakamia sanctuary. The mean cache depth was 4.3 cm ± 0.2 cm at Dryandra woodland compared with 4.6 cm ± 0.3 cm at Karakamia sanctuary. Significantly more seedlings and saplings grew away from sandalwood trees at sites where woylies were present than at sites with no woylies. In contrast, significantly more seedlings and saplings grew under adult sandalwood trees at the site without woylies than where they were present, although there were significantly lower rates of recruitment and sandalwood regeneration at these sites. In addition, significantly more whole, undisturbed sandalwood seeds were found under the parent trees at the woylie‐free site than at the site with woylies. These findings strongly suggest that little seed dispersal or regeneration of sandalwood occurs in the absence of woylies. Through scatter‐hoarding, woylies have the potential to disperse and cache sandalwood seeds away from the source and significantly alter the subsequent regeneration of sandalwood. Furthermore, by caching seeds large distances away from a source, woylies could modify the distribution of sandalwood in an area.     

Seed predation and dispersal of glabrous filbert (Corylus Heterophylla) and pilose filbert (Corylus Mandshurica) by small mammals in a temperate forest, northeast China

We investigated the seed dispersal of glabrous filbert (Corylus heterophylla) and pilose filbert (Corylus mandshurica), two large-seeded shrub species in a temperate forest, northeast China, September 2006. Small mammals such as Apodemus speciosus, Clethrlonomys rufocanus, and Eutamias sibiricus, were regarded as the main dispersal agents. More seeds were harvested by small mammals in pilose filbert (98%) than in glabrous filbert (87.5%) till our last survey. Seed removal rates differed between the two species. Fewer seeds of glabrous filbert (17.5%) were eaten in situ than pilose filbert (57.5%). More seeds of glabrous filbert were removed (70%), stay intact after removal (25.5%), eaten after removal (16%) than pilose filbert. However, more seeds were cached after removal in pilose filbert than in glabrous filbert (10.5 and 4%, respectively). Fewer tagged seeds of pilose filberts (14%) were missed than glabrous filberts (24.5%). About 8 and 12 primary caches were found in glabrous filbert and pilose filbert seeds respectively, indicating scatter hoarding. All of the removed seeds were distributed within 10 m of seed stations for both filberts. The average dispersal distances for glabrous filbert did not differ from pilose filbert. Only a small proportion of the caches remained till our last survey (2 and 1%, respectively). Based on the results, we found a difference in dispersal patterns of glabrous filbert and pilose filbert seeds. Evidences showed that glabrous filberts might be a less preferred seed species for small seed-eating mammals compared with pilose filbert, probably due to its harder and thicker husk and low seed profitability.     

Scatterhoarding of Manchurian walnut <Emphasis Type="Italic">Juglans mandshurica</Emphasis> by small mammals: response to seed familiarity and seed size

Dispersal patterns can be affected by seed familiarity and seed traits, including size, mass, and nutritional value, but these factors have not been intensively studied in the context of seed dispersal processes. Our aim was to study how small rodents respond to seed size and seed familiarity in their pattern of Manchurian walnut (Juglans mandshurica) seeds in two different habitats in temperate forests of northeast China. Our results demonstrated that Apodemus penisulae acts as the most important disperser for Manchurian walnut seeds. Inexperienced small rodents did not reject seeds of the Manchurian walnut and show similar seed removal rates as compared with experienced rodents. Both experienced and naïve rodents actively participated in seed scatterhoarding of Manchurian walnut seeds. Consecutive survey showed that seeds with large size/mass were removed faster than those with small size/mass, indicating a preference for large seeds. However, small seeds scatter-hoarded by small rodents were transported farther than large ones, failing to support the traditional optimization models for various tree species. Small seeds of Manchurian walnut in caches were less likely to be recovered than large ones and showed greater cache survival rates, indicating that small seeds would be more advantageous for regeneration than large seeds in small rodent-dominated forests.