ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome

The 26S proteasome degrades polyubiquitinated proteins by an energy-dependent mechanism. Here we define multiple roles for ATP in 26S proteasome function. ATP binding is necessary and sufficient for assembly of 26S proteasome from 20S proteasome and PA700/19S subcomplexes and for proteasome activation. Proteasome assembly and activation may require distinct ATP binding events. The 26S proteasome degrades nonubiquitylated, unstructured proteins without ATP hydrolysis, indicating that substrate translocation per se does not require the energy of hydrolysis. Nonubiquitylated folded proteins and certain polyubiquitylated folded proteins were refractory to proteolysis. The latter were deubiquitylated by an ATP-independent mechanism. Other folded as well as unstructured polyubiquitylated proteins required ATP hydrolysis for proteolysis and deubiquitylation. Thus, ATP hydrolysis is not used solely for substrate unfolding. These results indicate that 26S proteasome-catalyzed degradation of polyubiquitylated proteins involves mechanistic coupling of several processes and that such coupling imposes an energy requirement not apparent for any isolated process.     

Feeding the machine: mechanisms of proteasome-catalyzed degradation of ubiquitinated proteins

The proteasome plays a role in a myriad of intracellular processes from cell-cycle control to antigen presentation. Central to these processes is the targeting of selected proteins for proteasomal degradation via their conjugation to ubiquitin. The mechanisms by which the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal proteolysis occurs can be divided into four steps: first, substrate protein recognition by its cognate E3 ubiquitin ligase; second, polyubiquitinated protein substrate recruitment to the proteasome; third, protein substrate deubiquitination; and four, proteolytic chamber pore opening/substrate translocation followed by proteolysis. Recent advances include the identification of novel E3 ubiquitin ligase recognition determinants, a new isopeptidase activity, and a better understanding of how the proteasome's axial channels are gated.     

Biochemical and physical properties of the Methanococcus jannaschii 20S proteasome and PAN, a homolog of the ATPase (Rpt) subunits of the eucaryal 26S proteasome

The 20S proteasome is a self-compartmentalized protease which degrades unfolded polypeptides and has been purified from eucaryotes, gram-positive actinomycetes, and archaea. Energy-dependent complexes, such as the 19S cap of the eucaryal 26S proteasome, are assumed to be responsible for the recognition and/or unfolding of substrate proteins which are then translocated into the central chamber of the 20S proteasome and hydrolyzed to polypeptide products of 3 to 30 residues. All archaeal genomes which have been sequenced are predicted to encode proteins with up to approximately 50% identity to the six ATPase subunits of the 19S cap. In this study, one of these archaeal homologs which has been named PAN for proteasome-activating nucleotidase was characterized from the hyperthermophile Methanococcus jannaschii. In addition, the M. jannaschii 20S proteasome was purified as a 700-kDa complex by in vitro assembly of the alpha and beta subunits and has an unusually high rate of peptide and unfolded-polypeptide hydrolysis at 100 degrees C. The 550-kDa PAN complex was required for CTP- or ATP-dependent degradation of beta-casein by archaeal 20S proteasomes. A 500-kDa complex of PAN(Delta1-73), which has a deletion of residues 1 to 73 of the deduced protein and disrupts the predicted N-terminal coiled-coil, also facilitated this energy-dependent proteolysis. However, this deletion increased the types of nucleotides hydrolyzed to include not only ATP and CTP but also ITP, GTP, TTP, and UTP. The temperature optimum for nucleotide (ATP) hydrolysis was reduced from 80 degrees C for the full-length protein to 65 degrees C for PAN(Delta1-73). Both PAN protein complexes were stable in the absence of ATP and were inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide and p-chloromercuriphenyl-sulfonic acid. Kinetic analysis reveals that the PAN protein has a relatively high V(max) for ATP and CTP hydrolysis of 3.5 and 5.8 micromol of P(i) per min per mg of protein as well as a relatively low affinity for CTP and ATP with K(m) values of 307 and 497 microM compared to other proteins of the AAA family. Based on electron micrographs, PAN and PAN(Delta1-73) apparently associate with the ends of the 20S proteasome cylinder. These results suggest that the M. jannaschii as well as related archaeal 20S proteasomes require a nucleotidase complex such as PAN to mediate the energy-dependent hydrolysis of folded-substrate proteins and that the N-terminal 73 amino acid residues of PAN are not absolutely required for this reaction.     

Proteasome degradation: enter the substrate

Cells depend upon the regulated destruction of their various proteins to maintain homeostasis and change their metabolic state. A key component of this process is the proteasome - a large multisubunit protease whose catalytic sites are sequestered within a central chamber. Entry of substrates into proteasomes is regulated by activators and is generally thought to proceed sequentially, starting from one end of the substrate polypeptide. This conventional view is expanded by a recent paper, which indicates that some unfolded substrates can open the entrance to the proteolytic chamber in the absence of an activator and can enter the proteasome in a hairpin conformation to allow limited proteolysis of internal segments.     

Substrate recognition by AAA+ ATPases: distinct substrate binding modes in ATP-dependent protease Yme1 of the mitochondrial intermembrane space

The energy-dependent proteolysis of cellular proteins is mediated by conserved proteolytic AAA(+) complexes. Two such machines, the m- and i-AAA proteases, are present in the mitochondrial inner membrane. They exert chaperone-like properties and specifically degrade nonnative membrane proteins. However, molecular mechanisms of substrate engagement by AAA proteases remained elusive. Here, we define initial steps of substrate recognition and identify two distinct substrate binding sites in the i-AAA protease subunit Yme1. Misfolded polypeptides are recognized by conserved helices in proteolytic and AAA domains. Structural modeling reveals a lattice-like arrangement of these helices at the surface of hexameric AAA protease ring complexes. While helices within the AAA domain apparently play a general role for substrate binding, the requirement for binding to surface-exposed helices within the proteolytic domain is determined by the folding and membrane association of substrates. Moreover, an assembly factor of cytochrome c oxidase, Cox20, serves as a substrate-specific cofactor during proteolysis and modulates the initial interaction of nonassembled Cox2 with the protease. Our findings therefore reveal the existence of alternative substrate recognition pathways within AAA proteases and shed new light on molecular mechanisms ensuring the specificity of proteolysis by energy-dependent proteases.     

Dependence of proteasome processing rate on substrate unfolding

Protein degradation by eukaryotic proteasomes is a multi-step process involving substrate recognition, ATP-dependent unfolding, translocation into the proteolytic core particle, and finally proteolysis. To date, most investigations of proteasome function have focused on the first and the last steps in this process. Here we examine the relationship between the stability of a folded protein domain and its degradation rate. Test proteins were targeted to the proteasome independently of ubiquitination by directly tethering them to the protease. Degradation kinetics were compared for test protein pairs whose stability was altered by either point mutation or ligand binding, but were otherwise identical. In both intact cells and in reactions using purified proteasomes and substrates, increased substrate stability led to an increase in substrate turnover time. The steady-state time for degradation ranged from ～5 min (dihydrofolate reductase) to 40 min (I27 domain of titin). ATP turnover was 110/min./proteasome, and was not markedly changed by substrate. Proteasomes engage tightly folded substrates in multiple iterative rounds of ATP hydrolysis, a process that can be rate-limiting for degradation.     

Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: a destructive combination

Protein degradation by 20S proteasomes in vivo requires ATP hydrolysis by associated hexameric AAA ATPase complexes such as PAN in archaea and the homologous ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome. This review discusses recent insights into their multistep mechanisms and the roles of ATP. We have focused on the PAN complex, which offers many advantages for mechanistic and structural studies over the more complex 26S proteasome. By single-particle EM, PAN resembles a "top-hat" capping the ends of the 20S proteasome and resembles densities in the base of the 19S regulatory complex. The binding of ATP promotes formation of the PAN-20S complex, which induces opening of a gate for substrate entry into the 20S. PAN's C-termini, containing a conserved motif, docks into pockets in the 20S's alpha ring and causes gate opening. Surprisingly, once substrates are unfolded, their translocation into the 20S requires ATP-binding but not hydrolysis and can occur by facilitated diffusion through the ATPase in its ATP-bound form. ATP therefore serves multiple functions in proteolysis and the only step that absolutely requires ATP hydrolysis is the unfolding of globular proteins. The 26S proteasome appears to function by similar mechanisms.     

Analysis of proteasome-dependent proteolysis in Haloferax volcanii cells, using short-lived green fluorescent proteins

Proteasomes are energy-dependent proteases that are central to the quality control and regulated turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Dissection of this proteolytic pathway in archaea, however, has been hampered by the lack of substrates that are easily detected in whole cells. In the present study, we developed a convenient reporter system by functional expression of a green fluorescent protein variant with C-terminal fusions in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. The levels of this reporter protein correlated with whole-cell fluorescence that was readily detected in culture. Accumulation of the reporter protein was dependent on the sequence of the C-terminal amino acid fusion, as well as the presence of an irreversible, proteasome-specific inhibitor (clasto-lactacystin beta-lactone). This inhibitor was highly specific for H. volcanii 20S proteasomes, with a Ki of approximately 40 nM. In contrast, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride did not influence the levels of fluorescent reporter protein or inhibit 20S proteasomes. Together, these findings provide a powerful tool for the elucidation of protein substrate recognition motifs and the identification of new genes which may be involved in the proteasome pathway of archaea.     

Dual action of ATP hydrolysis couples lid closure to substrate release into the group II chaperonin chamber

Group II chaperonins are ATP-dependent ring-shaped complexes that bind nonnative polypeptides and facilitate protein folding in archaea and eukaryotes. A built-in lid encapsulates substrate proteins within the central chaperonin chamber. Here, we describe the fate of the substrate during the nucleotide cycle of group II chaperonins. The chaperonin substrate-binding sites are exposed, and the lid is open in both the ATP-free and ATP-bound prehydrolysis states. ATP hydrolysis has a dual function in the folding cycle, triggering both lid closure and substrate release into the central chamber. Notably, substrate release can occur in the absence of a lid, and lid closure can occur without substrate release. However, productive folding requires both events, so that the polypeptide is released into the confined space of the closed chamber where it folds. Our results show that ATP hydrolysis coordinates the structural and functional determinants that trigger productive folding.     

Functional asymmetries of proteasome translocase pore

Degradation by proteasomes involves coupled translocation and unfolding of its protein substrates. Six distinct but paralogous proteasome ATPase proteins, Rpt1 to -6, form a heterohexameric ring that acts on substrates. An axially positioned loop (Ar-Φ loop) moves in concert with ATP hydrolysis, engages substrate, and propels it into a proteolytic chamber. The aromatic (Ar) residue of the Ar-Φ loop in all six Rpts of S. cerevisiae is tyrosine; this amino acid is thought to have important functional contacts with substrate. Six yeast strains were constructed and characterized in which Tyr was individually mutated to Ala. The mutant cells were viable and had distinct phenotypes. rpt3, rpt4, and rpt5 Tyr/Ala mutants, which cluster on one side of the ATPase hexamer, were substantially impaired in their capacity to degrade substrates. In contrast, rpt1, rpt2, and rpt6 mutants equaled or exceeded wild type in degradation activity. However, rpt1 and rpt6 mutants had defects that limited cell growth or viability under conditions that stressed the ubiquitin proteasome system. In contrast, the rpt3 mutant grew faster than wild type and to a smaller size, a defect that has previously been associated with misregulation of G1 cyclins. This rpt3 phenotype probably results from altered degradation of cell cycle regulatory proteins. Finally, mutation of five of the Rpt subunits increased proteasome ATPase activity, implying bidirectional coupling between the Ar-Φ loop and the ATP hydrolysis site. The present observations assign specific functions to individual Rpt proteins and provide insights into the diverse roles of the axial loops of individual proteasome ATPases.     

An ALS disease mutation in Cdc48/p97 impairs 20S proteasome binding and proteolytic communication

Cdc48 (also known as p97 or VCP) is an essential and highly abundant, double-ring AAA+ ATPase, which is ubiquitous in archaea and eukaryotes. In archaea, Cdc48 ring hexamers play a direct role in quality control by unfolding and translocating protein substrates into the degradation chamber of the 20S proteasome. Whether Cdc48 and 20S cooperate directly in protein degradation in eukaryotic cells is unclear. Two regions of Cdc48 are important for 20S binding, the pore-2 loop at the bottom of the D2 AAA+ ring and a C-terminal tripeptide. Here, we identify an aspartic acid in the pore-2 loop as an important element in 20S recognition. Importantly, mutation of this aspartate in human Cdc48 has been linked to familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In archaeal or human Cdc48 variants, we find that mutation of this pore-2 residue impairs 20S binding and proteolytic communication but does not affect the stability of the hexamer or rates of ATP hydrolysis and protein unfolding. These results suggest that human Cdc48 interacts functionally with the 20S proteasome.     

20S proteasomes have the potential to keep substrates in store for continual degradation

The 20S core of the proteasome, which together with the regulatory particle plays a major role in the degradation of proteins in eukaryotic cells, is traversed by an internal system of cavities, namely two antechambers and one central proteolytic chamber. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying substrate binding and translocation of polypeptide chains into the interior of 20S proteasomes. Specifically, the role of the antechambers is not fully understood, and the number of substrate molecules sequestered within the internal cavities at any one time is unknown. Here we have shown that by applying both electron microscopy and tandem mass spectrometry (MS) approaches to this multisubunit complex we obtain precise information regarding the stoichiometry and location of substrates within the three chambers. The dissociation pattern in tandem MS allows us to conclude that a maximum of three green fluorescent protein and four cytochrome c substrate molecules are bound within the cavities. Our results also show that >95% of the population of proteasome molecules contain the maximum number of partially folded substrates. Moreover, we deduce that one green fluorescent protein or two cytochrome c molecules must reside within the central proteolytic chamber while the remaining substrate molecules occupy, singly, both antechambers. The results imply therefore an additional role for 20S proteasomes in the storage of substrates prior to their degradation, specifically in cases where translocation rates are slower than proteolysis. More generally, the ability to locate relatively small protein ligands sequestered within the 28-subunit core particle highlights the tremendous potential of tandem MS for deciphering substrate binding within large macromolecular assemblies.     

Glycine-alanine repeats impair proper substrate unfolding by the proteasome

Proteasome ATPases unravel folded proteins. Introducing a sequence containing only glycine and alanine residues (GAr) into substrates can impair their digestion. We previously proposed that a GAr interferes with the unfolding capacity of the proteasome, leading to partial degradation of products. Here we tested that idea in several ways. Stabilizing or destabilizing a folded domain within substrate proteins changed GAr-mediated intermediate production in the way predicted by the model. A downstream folded domain determined the sites of terminal proteolysis. The spacing between a GAr and a folded domain was critical for intermediate production. Intermediates containing a GAr did not remain associated with proteasomes, excluding models whereby retained GAr-containing proteins halt further processing. The following model is supported: a GAr positioned within the ATPase ring reduces the efficiency of coupling between nucleotide hydrolysis and work performed on the substrate. If this impairment takes place when unfolding must be initiated, insertion pauses and proteolysis is limited to the portion of the substrate that has already entered the catalytic chamber of the proteasome.     

Structure and mechanism of ATP-dependent proteases.

A general paradigm for energy-dependent proteases is emerging: ATP may be used to unfold the substrate and translocate it through a narrow channel within the enzyme into a central proteolytic chamber. Different members of the family present intriguing elaborations on this model.     

The I domain of the AAA+ HslUV protease coordinates substrate binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein degradation

In the AAA+ HslUV protease, substrates are bound and unfolded by a ring hexamer of HslU, before translocation through an axial pore and into the HslV degradation chamber. Here, we show that the N-terminal residues of an Arc substrate initially bind in the HslU axial pore, with key contacts mediated by a pore loop that is highly conserved in all AAA+ unfoldases. Disordered loops from the six intermediate domains of the HslU hexamer project into a funnel-shaped cavity above the pore and are positioned to contact protein substrates. Mutations in these I-domain loops increase K(M) and decrease V(max) for degradation, increase the mobility of bound substrates, and prevent substrate stimulation of ATP hydrolysis. HslU-ΔI has negligible ATPase activity. Thus, the I domain plays an active role in coordinating substrate binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein degradation by the HslUV proteolytic machine.     

Analysis of Proteasome-Dependent Proteolysis in Haloferax volcanii Cells, Using Short-Lived Green Fluorescent Proteins

Proteasomes are energy-dependent proteases that are central to the quality control and regulated turnover of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Dissection of this proteolytic pathway in archaea, however, has been hampered by the lack of substrates that are easily detected in whole cells. In the present study, we developed a convenient reporter system by functional expression of a green fluorescent protein variant with C-terminal fusions in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. The levels of this reporter protein correlated with whole-cell fluorescence that was readily detected in culture. Accumulation of the reporter protein was dependent on the sequence of the C-terminal amino acid fusion, as well as the presence of an irreversible, proteasome-specific inhibitor (clasto-lactacystin β-lactone). This inhibitor was highly specific for H. volcanii 20S proteasomes, with a K_i of ~40 nM. In contrast, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride did not influence the levels of fluorescent reporter protein or inhibit 20S proteasomes. Together, these findings provide a powerful tool for the elucidation of protein substrate recognition motifs and the identification of new genes which may be involved in the proteasome pathway of archaea.     

A self-compartmentalizing protease in Rhodococcus: the 20S proteasome

The 26S proteasome represents a major, energy-dependent and self- compartmentalizing protease system in eukaryotes. The proteolytic core of this complex, the 20S proteasome, is also ubiquitous in archaea. Although absent from most eubacteria, this multi- subunit protease was recently discovered in Rhodococcus and appears to be confined to actinomycetes. The eubacterial 20S proteasome represents an attractive complementary system to study proteasome assembly, quaternary structure, and catalytic mechanism. In addition, it is likely to contribute substantially to our understanding of the role of various self-compartmentalizing proteases in bacterial cells.     

Atomic force microscopy reveals two conformations of the 20 S proteasome from fission yeast

The proteasome is a major cytosolic proteolytic complex, indispensable in eukaryotic cells. The barrel-shaped core of this enzyme, the 20 S proteasome, is built from 28 subunits forming four stacked rings. The two inner beta-rings harbor active centers, whereas the two outer alpha-rings play a structural role. Crystal structure of the yeast 20 S particle showed that the entrance to the central channel was sealed. Because of this result, the path of substrates into the catalytic chamber has remained enigmatic. We have used tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) in liquid to address the dynamic aspects of the 20 S proteasomes from fission yeast. We present here evidence that, when observed with AFM, the proteasome particles in top view position have either open or closed entrance to the central channel. The preferred conformation depends on the ligands present. Apparently, the addition of a substrate to the uninhibited proteasome shifts the equilibrium toward the open conformation. These results shed new light on the possible path of the substrate into the proteolytic chamber.     

Localization to the proteasome is sufficient for degradation

The majority of unstable proteins in eukaryotic cells are targeted for degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Substrates for degradation are recognized by the E1, E2, and E3 ubiquitin conjugation machinery and tagged with polyubiquitin chains, which are thought to promote the proteolytic process through their binding with the proteasome. We describe a method to bypass the ubiquitination step artificially both in vivo and in a purified in vitro system. Seven proteasome subunits were tagged with Fpr1, and fusion reporter constructs were created with the Fpr1-rapamycin binding domain of Tor1. Reporter proteins were localized to the proteasome by the addition of rapamycin, a drug that heterodimerizes Fpr1 and Tor1. Degradation of reporter proteins was observed with proteasomes that had either Rpn10 or Pre10 subunits tagged with Fpr1. Our experiments resolved a simple but central problem concerning the design of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. We conclude that localization to the proteasome is sufficient for degradation and, therefore, any added functions polyubiquitin chains possess beyond tethering substrates to the proteasome are not strictly necessary for proteolysis.