HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF的临床特征及左心室重塑对比分析

目的:探讨射血分数保留的心衰(HFpEF)、射血分数中间范围的心衰(HFmr EF)和射血分数下降的心衰(HFr EF)患者临床特征及左心室重塑的差别。方法:选取2013年2月1日至2016年12月31日在我院心内住院的308名心力衰竭患者作为研究对象,根据入院后首次心脏彩超结果,按左室射血分数(LVEF)将入选的心力衰竭患者分为HFr EF组、HFmr EF组和HFpEF组,回顾性分析所有患者的临床一般资料、化验结果、超声数据和用药情况,对比分析3组患者的临床特征及左心室重塑的差别。结果:HFpEF组为123例(39.9%),HFmr EF组为98例(31.5%),HFr EF组为88例(28.6%);其中HFpEF组女性比例高于HFr EF组(59.4%vs.38.6%,P0.05),高血压和房颤患病率HFpEF组高于HFr EF组(P0.05);HFpEF组左心室重构类型以向心性重塑为主,HFr EF组则以离心性重塑为主;HFmr EF组女性比例及高血压、房颤患病率等临床特征及左心室重塑类型分布则介于HFpEF组与HFr EF之间。结论:HFpEF,HFmr EF与HFr EF组患者临床特点及左心室重塑类型分布显著不同,应对不同左室射血分数的心力衰竭患者采取更有针对性的治疗措施。     

Proteomic profiling of epicardial fat in heart failure with preserved versus reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction

In order to explore the proteomic signatures of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) related to the mechanism of heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a comprehensive proteomic analysis of EAT was made in HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 5) and HFpEF (n = 5) patients with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry experiments. The selected differential proteins were verified between HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 20) and HFpEF (n = 40) by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A total of 599 EAT proteins were significantly different in expression between HFrEF/HFmrEF and HFpEF. Among the 599 proteins, 58 proteins increased in HFrEF/HFmrEF compared to HFpEF, whereas 541 proteins decreased in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Of these proteins, TGM2 in EAT was down-regulated in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients and was confirmed to decrease in circulating plasma of the HFrEF/HFmrEF group (p = 0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed plasma TGM2 could be an independent predictor of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.033). Receiver operating curve analysis indicated that the combination of TGM2 and Gensini score improved the diagnostic value of HFrEF/HFmrEF (p = 0.002). In summary, for the first time, we described the proteome in EAT in both HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF and identified a comprehensive dimension of potential targets for the mechanism behind the EF spectrum. Exploring the role of EAT may offer potential targets for preventive intervention of HF.     

Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%

IntroductionThe efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with low cardiac function has been previously reported; however, only a few studies have included mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 79 patients (reduced ejection fraction [rEF]/mrEF, 38/41; paroxysmal/persistent, 37/42; heart failure hospitalizations within one year before ablation, 36 [45.6%]) who underwent the first ablation procedure at our hospital from April 2017 to December 2021. Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation were performed for 69 and 10 patients, respectively.ResultsComplications included pacemaker implantation for postoperative sick sinus syndrome in one patient and inguinal hematoma in one patient. Regarding efficacy, there were significant postoperative improvements in echocardiographic data, blood test values, and diuretic use. After a mean follow-up of 60 months, 86.1% patients had no AF recurrence. There were 9 heart failure hospitalizations (11.4%) and 5 all-cause deaths (6.3%); no significant differences were found between the rEF and mrEF groups. No significant predictors of AF recurrence were found in preoperative patient characteristics.ConclusionAF ablation in patients with LVEF <50% significantly improved cardiac and renal functions with few complications, resulting in a high non-recurrence rate and reduced heart failure.     

射血分数保留的老年心力衰竭患者的临床特征

目的:分析和比较射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFp EF)、射血分数中间值(HFmr EF)及射血分数降低的老年心力衰竭(HFr EF)患者临床特征的差异。方法:选取2017年9月至2018年8月哈尔滨市第一医院收治的老年慢性心力衰竭患者共287例,根据心动超声所测左室舒张末期内径(LVEF)值将其分为3组:HFpEF组175例、HFmr EF组50例和HFr EF组62例。比较各组患者一般情况、心动超声检查结果、血清学指标的差异。结果:(1)与HFr EF组患者比较,HFpEF组患者年龄、性别、吸烟史、体重指数(BMI)、原发冠心病、高血压、2型糖尿病患者比例、房颤发生率及心功能分级构成比均具有统计学差异(P0.05);(2)与HFr EF组相比较,HFpEF组患者的E/A比值,左房内径、肺动脉内径、LVEDD较小,而室间隔厚度较厚(P0.05);(3)与HFr EF组患者相比,HFpEF组血清总胆固醇、甘油三酯较高;血肌酐、血尿素氮、血尿酸、超敏C反应蛋白、N-末端脑钠肽前体水平较低,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:老年HFpEF心力衰竭患者以女性居多,体重指数较大,以向心性肥胖为主,血压水平较高,心功能II级者比例高,有明显的舒张功能不全,易发生房性心律失常,房颤发生率高,主要病因为高血压。     

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women: the Dutch Queen of Hearts program

Heart failure (HF) poses a heavy burden on patients, their families and society. The syndrome of HF comes in two types: with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The latter is on the increase and predominantly present in women, especially the older ones. There is an urgent need for mortality-reducing drugs in HFpEF, a disease affecting around 5 % of those aged 65 years and over. HFpEF develops in patients with risk factors and comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, COPD, but also preeclampsia. These conditions are likely to drive microvascular disease with involvement of the coronary microvasculature, which may eventually evolve into HFpEF. Currently, the diagnosis of HFPEF relies mainly on echocardiography. There are no biomarkers that can help diagnose female microvascular disease or facilitate the diagnosis of (early stages of) HFpEF. Recently a Dutch consortium was initiated, Queen of Hearts, with support from the Netherlands Heart Foundation, with the aim to discover and validate biomarkers for diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF in women. These biomarkers come from innovative blood-derived sources such as extracellular vesicles and circulating cells. Within the Queen of Hearts consortium, we will pursue female biomarkers that have the potential for further evolution in assays with point of care capabilities. As a spin-off, the consortium will gain knowledge on gender-specific pathology of HFpEF, possibly opening up novel treatment options.     

Biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Biomarkers are widely used and studied in heart failure. Most studies have described the utility and performance of biomarkers in sub-studies of randomised clinical trials, where the vast majority of the patients suffered from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and not with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As a result, there is a scarcity of data describing the levels, dynamics, clinical and biochemical correlates, and biology of biomarkers in patients suffering from HFpEF, whereas HFpEF is in fact a very frequent clinical entity. This article discusses the value of different biomarkers in HFpEF. We describe various aspects of natriuretic peptide measurements in HFpEF patients, with a focus on diagnosis, prognosis and the risk prediction of developing heart failure. Further, we will discuss several emerging biomarkers such as galectin-3 and suppression of tumorigenicity 2, and recently discovered ones such as growth differentiation factor-15 and syndecan-1.     

Características y resultados tras un año en pacientes ancianos ingresados con insuficiencia cardiaca y fracción de eyección reducida,intermedia o conservada

IntroductionThe latest European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure (HF) guidelines define three types of HF according to the ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) when EF < 40%, HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), when EF 40-49%, and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) when EF ≥ 50%. The objective of this study was to analyse the characteristics and results of elderly patients hospitalised with HF according to the new classification using EF.MethodsA prospective study was carried out with 531 HF patients aged ≥ 75 years classified according to EF, and admitted in the geriatric wards of 6 hospitals in Spain. An analysis was performed on the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as well as the morbidity and mortality at one year of follow-up.ResultsAs regards EF, 17.1% had HFrEF, 10% had HFmrEF, and 72.9% had HFpEF. Patients with HFmrEF were more similar to those with HFrEF in terms of a younger age, predominance of men, and previous admission due to HF. This was also the case with the use of drugs for neurohormonal blockade. Patients with HFrEF (compared to those with HFmrEF and HFpEF), had higher mortality (35.2%, 24.5%, and 25.6%, respectively), more readmissions for HF (17.6%, 15.1%, and 14.5%, respectively), and more events (61.5%, 45.3%, and 52.5%, respectively), although there were no significant differences. There were also no differences observed in the survival analysis between the EF groups and the time-dependent outcome variables.ConclusionsIn elderly patients hospitalised with HF, those classified as HFmrEF did not show any clear differences with respect to those with HFrEF or HFpEF. There were no differences in terms of morbidity and mortality.     

Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Background: A significant proportion of heart failure (HF) patients have preserved ejection fraction (EF). Considering that inflammation and oxidative stress are involved in HF evolution, we investigated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (LpPLA2), an enzyme involved in these pathophysiologic processes in relation to EF.

Methods and results: The study included 208 HF patients and 20 healthy controls. HF patients with preserved EF (HFpEF) represented 42.31% of all HF patients. LpPLA2 activity was significantly increased in HF patients when compared with controls and was higher in HFpEF than in HF with reduced EF patients (HFrEF). The incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy was higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF (EF < 50).

Conclusion: Confirming its role as a marker of vascular inflammation, LpPLA2 seems to be a biomarker constantly correlated with HF, regardless of etiology. Elevated plasma values of LpPLA2 in HFpEF are consistent with the exacerbated inflammatory status.     

The Benefit of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is correlated with a poor biventricular pacing and inadequate response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Biventricular pacing improvement can be achieved by conducting the atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA). We aimed to investigate the benefit of AVJA for permanent AF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients receiving CRT.MethodsIn August 2020, a systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing CRT plus AVJA versus CRT for permanent AF and HFrEF patients was conducted. Relevant articles were identified through the electronic scientific database such as ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Cochrane. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and pooled mean difference (MD) were estimated.ResultsA total of 3199 patients from 14 cohort studies were involved in this study. Additional AVJA reduced cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61 to 0.93, P < 0.01) in permanent AF and HFrEF patients receiving CRT. Biventricular pacing rate was higher in CRT plus AVJA group (MD = 8.65%, 95% CI = 5.62 to 11.67, P < 0.01) than in CRT alone group. The reverse remodeling characterized by the reduction of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) was greater in the CRT plus AVJA group (MD = ?2.11 mm, 95% CI = ?3.79 to ?0.42, P = 0.01).ConclusionIn permanent AF and HFrEF patients receiving CRT, AVJA effectively increased the biventricular pacing rate. Adequate biventricular pacing rate provided a better response to the CRT marked by the greater ventricular reverse remodeling and survival from cardiovascular mortality.     

Animal models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes a clinical syndrome in which the diagnostic criteria of heart failure are not accompanied by gross disturbances of systolic function, as assessed by ejection fraction. In turn, under most circumstances, diastolic function is impaired. Although it now represents over 50 % of all patients with heart failure, the mechanisms of HFpEF remain understood, precluding effective therapy. Understanding the pathophysiology of HFpEF has been restricted by both limited access to human myocardial biopsies and by the lack of animal models that fully mimic human pathology. Animal models are valuable research tools to clarify subcellular and molecular mechanisms under conditions where the comorbidities and other confounding factors can be precisely controlled. Although most of the heart failure animal models currently available represent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, several HFpEF animal models have been proposed. However, few of these fulfil all the features present in human disease. In this review we will provide an overview of the currently available models to study HFpEF from rodents to large animals as well as present advantages and disadvantages of these models.     

慢性病轨迹模式在射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者中的应用研究进展

近年来,射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)的防治进展已成为国内外心血管医生关注的热点。HFpEF的防治是一个长期、综合的过程,虽然在规范化药物治疗方面有所进步,但是HFpEF患者的症状仍未得到理想控制。因此,以合理防治为主的全周期健康管理模式对HFpEF患者具有极其重要的意义。随着对HFpEF患者长期随访管理及预后相关研究的深入,慢性病轨迹模式逐步成为具有良好前景的规范化管理模式。科学、合理的慢性病轨迹模式管理可以更好地控制HFpEF患者症状,持续改善其生活质量。本文就慢性病轨迹模式管理在HFpEF患者中的最新进展做一综述。     

诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复对射血分数降低的心力衰竭疗效的研究

目的:探讨诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复对射血分数降低(HFr EF)的心力衰竭(HF)的临床疗效。方法:将我院心内科于2018年1月～2019年4月收治的70例HFr EF患者随机分为两组,各35例。对照组均给予诺欣妥规范治疗,实验组在此基础上根据心肺运动测试(CPET)测得代谢当量制定个性化心脏运动康复,包括院内、院外心脏康复干预及定期随访,为期6个月。采用彩色心脏超声诊断仪、心肺运动测试(CPET)分析两组治疗前后心肺功能变化,同时观察住院及随访期间的预后情况。结果:治疗6个月后,两组左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)均明显改善,且实验组显著优于对照组(P0.05)。治疗6个月后,实验组AT明显升高,峰值VO2/kg、峰值VO2水平均有一定程度上升,且明显优于对照组(P0.05)。与对照组比较,实验组90d内HF再住院率(8.6%vs.28.6%)、随访期间MACEs发生率(17.1%vs.40.0%)均显著降低(P0.05)。结论:诺欣妥联合心脏运动康复治疗可使HFr EF患者显著获益,在改善心肺功能、运动能力及近期预后方面疗效显著,可作为HFr EF患者的一线治疗方案。     

Early calcium handling imbalance in pressure overload-induced heart failure with nearly normal left ventricular ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common clinical syndrome associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic options are limited due to a lack of knowledge of the pathology and its evolution. We investigated the cellular phenotype and Ca²⁺ handling in hearts recapitulating HFpEF criteria. HFpEF was induced in a portion of male Wistar rats four weeks after abdominal aortic banding. These animals had nearly normal ejection fraction and presented elevated blood pressure, lung congestion, concentric hypertrophy, increased LV mass, wall stiffness, impaired active relaxation and passive filling of the left ventricle, enlarged left atrium, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Left ventricular cell contraction was stronger and the Ca²⁺ transient larger. Ca²⁺ cycling was modified with a RyR2 mediated Ca²⁺ leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and impaired Ca²⁺ extrusion through the Sodium/Calcium exchanger (NCX), which promoted an increase in diastolic Ca²⁺. The Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ ATPase (SERCA2a) and NCX protein levels were unchanged. The phospholamban (PLN) to SERCA2a ratio was augmented in favor of an inhibitory effect on the SERCA2a activity. Conversely, PLN phosphorylation at the calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII)-specific site (PLN-Thr17), which promotes SERCA2A activity, was increased as well, suggesting an adaptive compensation of Ca²⁺ cycling. Altogether our findings show that cardiac remodeling in hearts with a HFpEF status differs from that known for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. These data also underscore the interdependence between systolic and diastolic “adaptations” of Ca²⁺ cycling with complex compensative interactions between Ca²⁺ handling partner and regulatory proteins.     

Understanding heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: where are we today?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a complex and heterogeneous clinical syndrome, which is increasingly prevalent and associated with poor outcome. In contrast to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), modern heart failure pharmacotherapy did not improve outcome in HFpEF, which was attributed to incomplete understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology, patient heterogeneity and lack of insight into primary pathophysiological processes. HFpEF patients are frequently elderly females and patients demonstrate a high prevalence of non-cardiac comorbidities, which independently adversely affect myocardial structural and functional remodelling. Furthermore, although diastolic left ventricular dysfunction represents the dominant abnormality in HFpEF, numerous ancillary mechanisms are frequently present, which also negatively impact on cardiovascular reserve. Over the past decade, clinical and translational research has improved insight into HFpEF pathophysiology and the importance of comorbidities and patient heterogeneity. Recently, a new paradigm for HFpEF was proposed, which states that comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodelling in HFpEF through coronary microvascular inflammation. Regarding the conceptual framework of HFpEF treatment, emphasis may need to shift from a ‘one fits all’ strategy to an individualised approach based on phenotypic patient characterisation and diagnostic and pathophysiological stratification of myocardial disease processes. This review will describe these novel insights from a pathophysiological standpoint.     

沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的临床研究

摘要 目的：观察沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭(heart failure with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)患者的效果。方法：选取2018年1月-2018年12月内蒙古自治区人民医院心脏中心心血管内科收治的90例HFrEF患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组45例。对照组患者常规抗心衰治疗,其中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂（angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor,ACEI）为盐酸贝那普利;观察组患者将常规抗心衰治疗中的ACEI替换为沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠,两组患者均治疗1月。比较两组患者治疗的总有效率、血浆N端前脑钠肽（N-terminal pro-B-type natriaretic peptide,NT-proBNP）、血浆肌钙蛋白T（cardiac troponin T,cTnT）、肌酸激酶同工酶（creatine kinase isoenzymes,CK-MB）、左室舒张末期内径（left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVEDD）、左室收缩末期内径（left ventricular end systolic diameter,LVESD）、左室射血分数（left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF）、6分钟步行距离（6 minutes walking distance,6MWD）及不良反应。结果：观察组患者临床疗效优于对照组（P<0.05）,NT-proBNP、cTnT、LVEDD和LVESD较对照组明显降低（P<0.05）,LVEF和6MWD 较对照组明显增加（P<0.05）;对照组血肌酐水平显著高于观察组（P<0.05）。结论：沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗HFrEF临床疗效好,能有效改善心功能。     

糖尿病对射血分数保留心力衰竭患者血生化指标、心脏指标及生活质量的影响

摘要 目的：探讨糖尿病（DM）对射血分数保留心力衰竭（HFpEF）患者血生化指标、心脏指标及生活质量的影响。方法：选取2017年1月-2019年5月我院收治的246例HFpEF患者作为研究对象,根据是否并发DM分为DM-HFpEF组（n=98）和NDM-HFpEF组（n=148）,比较两组患者基线资料、血生化指标,采用超声心动图检测心功能参数,采用明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量调查表（MLHFQ）评价患者的生活质量。结果：两组患者体重、收缩压、合并冠心病比例、合并高血压比例相比较,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05);与NDM-HFpEF组患者相比,DM-HFpEF组患者白细胞计数（WBC）、中性粒细胞计数（N）、血肌酐（Scr）、甘油三酯（TG）、空腹血糖（FBG）、餐后两小时血糖（2hPBG）、K⁺水平升高,血红蛋白（Hb）、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）水平降低（P＜0.05);DM- HFpEF组舒张末期左心室容积指数（LVEDVI）低于NDM-HFpEF组患者,室间隔厚度(IVS)、左心室后壁厚度（PWTD）、E峰、E/e''高于NDM-HFpEF组患者,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05);DM- HFpEF组患者MLHFQ中体力限制、社会限制、情绪、经济维度评分及总分高于NDM-HFpEF组患者,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05)。结论：DM促进了HFpEF患者IVS、PWTD的增厚,降低了心脏舒张功能和患者的生活质量,且明显加重了HFpEF患者血糖血脂的代谢紊乱。     

Is enhancing cGMP-PKG signalling a promising therapeutic target for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, i.e. HFpEF, is highly prevalent in ageing populations, accounting for more than 50 % of all cases of heart failure in Western societies, and is closely associated with comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes and arterial hypertension. However, all large multicentre trials of potential HFpEF treatments conducted to date have failed to produce positive outcomes. These disappointing results suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ strategy may be ill-suited to HFpEF and support the use of tailored, personalised therapeutic approaches with specific treatments designed for specific comorbidity-related HFpEF phenotypes. The accumulation of a multitude of cardiovascular comorbidities over time leads to increased systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation, eventually resulting in degradation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) via multiple pathways, thereby reducing protein kinase G (PKG) activity. The importance of cGMP-PKG pathway modulation is supported by growing evidence that suggests that this pathway may be a promising therapeutic target, evidence that is mainly based on its role in the phosphorylation of the giant cytoskeletal protein titin. This review will focus on the preclinical and early clinical evidence in the field of cGMP-enhancing therapies and PKG activation.     

诺欣妥对射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者血管内皮损伤及生活质量的影响

目的:探讨诺欣妥对射血分数降低的心力衰竭(heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)患者血管内皮损伤及生活质量的影响。方法:将复旦大学附属闵行医院心内科2017年9月～2018年6月收治的170例HFrEF患者随机分为两组,每组各85例。对照组均给予心衰(heart failure,HF)标准化治疗,研究组在此基础上给予诺欣妥治疗,起始剂量50 mg/次,2次/d,每隔2-4周增加1倍剂量,逐步调整至200 mg/次并作为维持剂量,2次/d。所有患者均连续治疗10周。比较两组患者治疗前后血管内皮功能指标、生活质量评分的变化,住院及随访期间的预后转归。结果:治疗后,两组血清一氧化氮(nitric oxide,NO)、降钙素基因相关肽(calcitonin gene-related peptide,CGRP)水平均较治疗前明显升高,血清内皮素-1(endothelin 1,ET-1)水平较治疗前明显下降,且研究组上述指标水平明显优于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗后躯体、情绪、其他领域及总分均较治疗前明显降低,且研究组除其他领域评分外其余维度评分及总分均明显低于对照组(P0.05)。与对照组比较,研究组住院期间全因死亡率、30 d内HF再住院率及随访期间不良心血管事件(adverse cardiovascular events,MACEs)发生率均显著降低(P0.05)。结论:诺欣妥治疗可使HFrEF患者明显获益,在改善血管内皮损伤、生活质量及近期预后方面效果显著优于心衰标准化治疗。     

Comparison between surgical and catheter based ablation in atrial fibrillation,should surgical based ablation be implemented as first line? - A meta-analysis of studies

IntroductionAblation remains a modality of choice in select patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF). Which is done via a surgical or catheter-based approach.ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of Surgical and Catheter ablation in the management of AF.MethodsElectronic search on PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, EuropePMC, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar was done. Studies comparing the use of surgical or catheter ablation in patients with AF were included. The Primary outcome of interest was Arrhythmia free patients at 12 months post-ablation.ResultsEight studies (744 patients) reported a statistically significant difference in Arrhythmia recurrence rate between surgical and catheter-based ablation. The pooled hazard ratio was chosen to compare the risk of AF recurrence between these groups with pooled Hazard ratio comparing surgical to catheter approach of 0.40 [0.35,0.45], p < 0.001 favoring surgical approach; low heterogeneity I² 22%, p = 0.25. Meta-analyses were also performed on procedural time, length of stay and major adverse events.ConclusionThe increased rate of adverse effects and length of hospitalization impedes the implementation of surgical ablation as primary ablation method of AF in general. However, the result of our meta-analysis shows the promising result of surgical ablation compared to catheter-based ablation.     

组织多普勒成像对射血分数正常的心衰患者左心功能评价

目的:探讨组织多普勒成像(TDI)技术评价射血分数正常的心衰患者左室长轴功能特点。方法:选取30名健康人(Ⅰ组)、EF>50%的心衰患者30名(Ⅱ组)和EF<50%的心衰患者30名(Ⅲ组)作为研究对象,采用TDI在二尖瓣环室间隔(ivs)、侧壁(l)、前壁(a)、后壁(p)、下壁(d)测量其Sm、DSm、IVCTm、TSm、Em、Am、IVRTm、TEm等指标。结果:Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组DSm、Sm逐渐减低,(P<0.05);而IVCTm、TSm逐渐升高(P<0.05);IVRTm、TEm在Ⅰ组、Ⅲ组、Ⅱ组逐渐升高(P<0.05);DSm及TEm在诊断EF>50%心衰患者心功能的指标中ROC曲线下面积最大,同样DSp及TEp在五个位点中ROC曲线下面积最大。结论:射血分数正常的心衰患者存在收缩减低;DSm及TEm是诊断EF>50%心衰患者心功能比较有效的指标;后壁是诊断的最佳位点。