Dictyostelium mucoroides cells exhibit cell cycle-dependent sorting behavior as observed in D. discoideum development

Evidence has been obtained indicating that the cell's position in the cell cycle at the onset of starvation is a naturally occurring variable closely involved in the subsequent sorting and pattern formation during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum Ax2. It is of interest to know whether a similar phenomenon is also noticed in species other than D. discoideum and also without any treatment of cells for cell synchronization. For this, the sorting behavior of D. mucoroides-7 ( Dm7 ) cells and its relation to the cell-cycle phase at the onset of starvation were analyzed, using non-synchronized Dm7 cells pulse-labeled with 5'-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU). The results demonstrate that Dm7 cells starved at the early G2 phase aggregate most rapidly, but are eventually sorted out to the posterior prespore zone of migrating slugs. In contrast, cells starved at the mid late G2 phase exhibited slower aggregation, but were sorted out to the anterior zone (tip), this being basically similar to the sorting behavior of D. discoideum cells. Measurements of cell numbers and nuclearity provided evidence that approximately 80% of cells progressed their cell-cycle after the formation of multicellular structures (mounds), probably coupling with prespore differentiation as in the case of D. discoideum . Thus, cell cycle-dependent sorting during Dictyostelium development is most likely to be a common phenomenon in different species.     

Cell-cycle progression during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum and its relation to the subsequent cell-sorting in the multicellular structures

Previous studies have shown that the cell-cycle phase at the onset of starvation is a naturally occurring variable that is closely involved in the subsequent sorting and differentiation of cells during Dictyostelium development. Here the cell-cycle progression during the development of D. discoideum Ax-2 cells and its relation to the subsequent cell-sorting were analyzed in detail using synchronized cells and their pulse-labeling by 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). Measurements of cell number and nuclearity provided evidence that about 80% of cells progressed their cell-cycle after formation of multicellular structures (mounds). Many cells (T7 cells) starved at mid–late G2-phase (just before the PS-point from which cells initiate development when starved) progressed to the cell-cycle after mound formation. In contrast, a less amount of cells (T1 cells) starved at late G2-phase (just after the PS-point) progressed through the cell-cycle after mound formation. The significance of cell-cycle progression presented here is discussed, with reference to cell differentiation and pattern formation.     

Prespore cell fate bias in G1 phase of the cell cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum

By generating a population of Dictyostelium cells that are in the G1 phase of the cell cycle we have examined the influence of cell cycle status on cell fate specification, cell type proportioning and its regulation, and terminal differentiation. The lack of observable mitosis during the development of these cells and the quantification of their cellular DNA content suggests that they remain in G1 throughout development. Furthermore, chromosomal DNA synthesis was not detectable these cells, indicating that no synthesis phase had occurred, although substantial mitochondrial DNA synthesis did occur in prespore cells. The G1-phase cells underwent normal morphological development and sporulation but displayed an elevated prespore/prestalk ratio of 5.7 compared to the 3.0 (or 3:1) ratio normally observed in populations dominated by G2-phase cells. When migrating slugs produced by G1-phase cells were bisected, each half could reestablish the 5.7 (or 5.7:1) prespore/prestalk ratio. These results demonstrate that Dictyostelium cells can carry out the entire developmental cycle in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and that passage from G2 into G1 phase is not required for sporulation. Our results also suggest that the population asymmetry provided by the distribution of cells around the cell cycle at the time of starvation is not strictly required for cell type proportioning. Finally, when developed together with G2-phase cells, G1-phase cells preferentially become prespore cells and exclude G2-phase cells from the prespore-spore cell population, suggesting that G1-phase cells have an advantage over G2-phase cells in executing the spore cell differentiation pathway.     

Implications of Differential Chemotaxis and Cohesiveness for Cell Sorting in the Development of Dictyostelium discoideum

Cell sorting behavior was observed during the development of Dictyostelium discoideum Ax-2, between cells grown with [G(+) cells] and without [G(−) cells] glucose. Development of the G(−) cells was about 2-3 hr faster, as reflected by differences in chemotactic sensitivity of the cells and cell cohesiveness. Among various mixing combinations of G(−) and G(+) cells, the most clear sorting occured when vegetative G(+) cells were mixed with G(−) cells which had been allowed to develop for 3 hr, the G(−) cells being located in the anterior prestalk region of a migrating slug. In contrast, vegetative G(−) cells moved to the posterior prespore region of a slug when mixed with G(+) cells which had developed for 6 hr. These findings indicate a close relationship of the cellular developmental stage to the sorting behavior. Possible implications of the differential chemotactic ability and cohesiveness for the sorting mechanism are disscussed.     

Cell cycle phase in Dictyostelium discoideum is correlated with the expression of cyclic AMP production, detection, and degradation. Involvement of cyclic AMP signaling in cell sorting

Cell cycle phase in Dictyostelium is correlated with a different preference for either spore or stalk differentiation. Cells which start development early in the cell cycle (E cells) exhibit a strong tendency to sort to the prestalk region of slugs, while late cell cycle cells (L cells) sort to the prespore region. We investigated the expression of the cAMP chemotactic system during development of synchronized E and L cells and found that E cells exhibit cAMP-binding activity, cell surface cAMP-phosphodiesterase (mPDE) activity, and the ability to relay cAMP signals at least 2 hr earlier and to higher levels than L cells. We hypothesize that E cells are prestalk sorters because they are the first to initiate aggregation centers and respond most effectively with chemotaxis and signal relay.     

Changes in the DNA content of amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum during growth and development.

A fluorimetric assay has been used to determine the DNA content of amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum during growth and development. Amoebae grown in axenic culture tended to be multinucleate and had a greater DNA content than amoebae grown with a bacterial substrate, which were mononucleate. During the first 10 h of development there was little change in the DNA content of amoebae grown with a bacterial substrate, but the average DNA content per cell in amoebae grown axenically decreased as the amoebae became virtually mononucleate. Amoebae at 10 h development that had been harvested during exponential axenic growth were divided into two populations by countercurrent distribution in a polymer two-phase system. DNA content indicated that one population was largely in the G2-phase of the cell cycle, whereas the other population was largely in the G1-phase. Similar results were obtained at 10 h development with amoebae harvested during the stationary phase of axenic growth, although these amoebae start development all in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. Spores had a low DNA content, indicating that they were in G1-phase. It is proposed that all amoebae in G2-phase after early development differentiate, after mitosis, into spores and that stalk cells are formed from amoebae that remain in G1-phase after 10 h development.     

The control of chemotactic cell movement during Dictyostelium morphogenesis

Differential cell movement is an important mechanism in the development and morphogenesis of many organisms. In many cases there are indications that chemotaxis is a key mechanism controlling differential cell movement. This can be particularly well studied in the starvation-induced multicellular development of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Upon starvation, up to 10(5) individual amoebae aggregate to form a fruiting body The cells aggregate by chemotaxis in response to propagating waves of cAMP, initiated by an aggregation centre. During their chemotactic aggregation the cells start to differentiate into prestalk and prespore cells, precursors to the stalk and spores that form the fruiting body. These cells enter the aggregate in a random order but then sort out to form a simple axial pattern in the slug. Our experiments strongly suggest that the multicellular aggregates (mounds) and slugs are also organized by propagating cAMP waves and, furthermore, that cell-type-specific differences in signalling and chemotaxis result in cell sorting, slug formation and movement.     

The cell cycle and its relationship to aggregation in the cellular slime mold, Dictyostelium discoideum

Vegetative amoebae of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum were synchronized by the use of a temperature-sensitive mutant. The synchronized population was then used to analyze the cell cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. This in turn enabled us to study the relationship between specific stages of the cell cycle and the initiation of aggregation. It was shown that all cells are at the same position (midway in G₂) at the time of aggregation. Synchronous cells starved at all points in the cell cycle, however, took the same length of time to aggregate. This suggests that the limiting step in the aggregation process is starvation, which is independent of the position of the cells in the cell cycle.     

Cell-cycle regulation of center initiation in Dictyostelium discoideum

The center-initiating behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in various cell-cycle phases was investigated. Small populations of synchronized AX-2 cells were seeded 1 in 1000 into cultures of a nonsignaling mutant (NP160) incapable of initiating centers. The ability of the wild-type AX-2 cells to initiate centers among mutant amoebae displayed cell-cycle regulation. Approximately 50% of a population of S-phase cells initiated centers while only 7.5% of a population of late G2-phase cells resulted in center formation. The timing of center formation also varied with cycle position. Synchronous cultures containing only AX-2 S-phase amoebae (no NP160) displayed the initial signs of aggregation after 4.5 hr of starvation and streaming into the aggregate was complete after 6 hr. In contrast, cultures of late G2-phase amoebae initiated aggregation centers after 5.5 hr of starvation and did not complete streaming until 7.5 hr. In addition, the number of aggregates formed by these synchronous cultures of AX-2 cells also varied with cycle position. In general, these results suggest a cell-cycle modulation of the autonomous signaling responsible for center initiation.     

Cell behavior during formation of prestalk/prespore pattern in submerged agglomerates of Dictyostelium discoideum

When cells dissociated from Dictyostelium discoideum slugs were cultured in roller tubes, they formed agglomerates in which prestalk cells were initially dispersed but soon sorted out to the center and then moved to the edge to reconstitute the prestalk/prespore pattern. To examine the mechanism of sorting out, individual prestalk cells were traced by a videotape recorder. The radial component of the rate of movement toward the center of the presumptive prestalk region was calculated. Prestalk cells did not move randomly, but rather directionally toward the center. Their movement was pulsatile, with a period of ca. 15 min, and accompanied by occasional formation of cell streams, thus resembling the movement observable during cell aggregation. These results favor the idea that prestalk cells sort out to the prestalk region due to differential chemotaxis rather than differential adhesiveness. After formation of the prestalk/prespore pattern, the prestalk region rotated along the circumference of the agglomerates. This appears comparable to migration of slugs on the substratum, the rate of rotation being similar to that of slug migration. To examine the processes of pattern formation during development, washed vegetative cells were cultured in roller tubes. Prespore cells identified by antispore immunoglobulin initially appeared randomly within the agglomerates, but then nonprespore cells accumulated in the center and finally moved to the edge to establish the prestalk/prespore pattern, the processes being similar to those of pattern reconstruction with differentiated prestalk and prespore cells.     

Cell sorting analysis of cell cycle-dependent X-ray sensitivity in end joining-deficient human cells

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) plays a major role in the repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), especially during the G1-phase of the cell cycle. Using a flow cytometric cell sorter, we fractionated G1- and S/G2-phase cells based on size to assess the DSB-repair activity in NHEJ factor-deficient DT40 and Nalm-6 cell lines. Colony formation assays revealed that the X-ray sensitivities of the G1-enriched populations correctly reflected the DSB-repair activities of both the DT40 and Nalm-6 cell lines. Furthermore, as assessed by γ-H2AX foci formation, the sorted cells exhibited less DNA damage than chemically synchronized cells. Given that it does not use fluorescent labeling or chemical agents, this method of cell sorting is simpler and less toxic than other methods, making it applicable to a variety of cell lines, including those that cannot be synchronized by standard chemical treatments.     

A density-sensing factor regulates signal transduction in Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium discoideum initiates development when cells overgrow their bacterial food source and starve. To coordinate development, the cells monitor the extracellular level of a protein, conditioned medium factor (CMF), secreted by starved cells. When a majority of the cells in a given area have starved, as signaled by CMF secretion, the extracellular level of CMF rises above a threshold value and permits aggregation of the starved cells. The cells aggregate using relayed pulses of cAMP as the chemoattractant. Cells in which CMF accumulation has been blocked by antisense do not aggregate except in the presence of exogenous CMF. We find that these cells are viable but do not chemotax towards cAMP. Videomicroscopy indicates that the inability of CMF antisense cells to chemotax is not due to a gross defect in motility, although both video and scanning electron microscopy indicate that CMF increases the frequency of pseudopod formation. The activations of Ca2+ influx, adenylyl cyclase, and guanylyl cyclase in response to a pulse of cAMP are strongly inhibited in cells lacking CMF, but are rescued by as little as 10 s exposure of cells to CMF. The activation of phospholipase C by cAMP is not affected by CMF. Northern blots indicate normal levels of the cAMP receptor mRNA in CMF antisense cells during development, while cAMP binding assays and Scatchard plots indicate that CMF antisense cells contain normal levels of the cAMP receptor. In Dictyostelium, both adenylyl and guanylyl cyclases are activated via G proteins. We find that the interaction of the cAMP receptor with G proteins in vitro is not measurably affected by CMF, whereas the activation of adenylyl cyclase by G proteins requires cells to have been exposed to CMF. CMF thus appears to regulate aggregation by regulating an early step of cAMP signal transduction.     

Live imaging of the Dictyostelium cell cycle reveals widespread S phase during development, a G2 bias in spore differentiation and a premitotic checkpoint

The regulation of the Dictyostelium cell cycle has remained ambiguous owing to difficulties in long-term imaging of motile cells and a lack of markers for defining cell cycle phases. There is controversy over whether cells replicate their DNA during development, and whether spores are in G1 or G2 of the cell cycle. We have introduced a live-cell S-phase marker into Dictyostelium cells that allows us to precisely define cycle phase. We show that during multicellular development, a large proportion of cells undergo nuclear DNA synthesis. Germinating spores enter S phase only after their first mitosis, indicating that spores are in G2. In addition, we demonstrate that Dictyostelium heterochromatin is copied late in S phase and replicates via accumulation of replication factors, rather than recruitment of DNA to pre-existing factories. Analysis of variability in cycle times indicates that regulation of the cycle manifests at a single random transition in G2, and we present the first identified checkpoint in Dictyostelium, which operates at the G2-M transition in response to DNA damage.     

The Dictyostelium cell cycle and its relationship to differentiation

Abstract The Dictyostelium vegetative cell cycle is characterized by a short mitotic period followed immediately by a short S-phase (less than 30 min) and a long and variable G2 phase. The cell cycle continues during differentiation despite a decrease in cell mass: DNA replication and mitosis occur early in development and also at the tipped aggregate stage. Cells that are in mitosis, S-phase or early G2, when starved differentiate into prestalk cells and cells that are in the middle of G2 differentiate into prespore cells. We postulate that there is a restriction point late in the G2 phase, about 1–2 h before mitosis, where the cells can be arrested either by starvation and the initiation of development, by growing into stationary phase, or by prolonged incubation at low temperature. During development, this block persists to the tipped aggregate stage, where it is specifically released in prespore cells, and these cells then go through one more round of cell division. Genes encoding components of the cell cycle machinery have recently been isolated and attemps to specifically block the cell cycle by reverse genetics to study the effects on differentiation have been initiated.     

Cell Sorting daring Pattern Formation in Dictyostelium

Formation of the prestalk-prespore pattern in Dictyostelium was investigated in slugs and submerged clumps of cells. Prestalk and prespore cells were identified by staining with vital dyes, which are shown to be stable cell markers. Dissociated slug cells reaggregate and form slugs that contain a prestalk-prespore pattern indistinguishable from the original pattern. The pattern forms by sorting out of stained prestalk cells from unstained prespore cells. Sorting also occurs in clumps of dissociated slug cells submerged in liquid or agar. A pattern arises in 2 h in which a central core of stained cells is surrounded by a periphery of unstained cells. Sorting appears to be due to differential chemotaxis of stained and unstained cells to cAMP since exogenous cAMP (>10⁻⁷ M) reverses the normal direction of sorting-out such that stained cells sort to the periphery of the clumps.
Isolated portions of slugs regenerate a new prestalk-prespore pattern. Posterior isolates regenerate a pattern within 2 h due to sorting of a population of vitally stained 'anterior-like' cells present in posteriors. Anterior-like cells do not sort in intact slugs due to the influence of a diffusible inhibitor secreted by the anterior region. During posterior regeneration this signal is absent and anterior-like cells rapidly acquire the ability to sort. Anterior isolates regenerate a staining pattern more slowly than posterior isolates by a process that requires conversion of stained prestalk cells to unstained prespore cells.
The results suggest that pattern formation in Dictyostelium consists of two processes: establishment of appropriate proportions of two cell types and establishment of the pattern itself by a mechanism of sorting-out.     

The cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 regulates morphogenesis through differential spatiotemporal expression in Dictyostelium discoideum

During development of Dictyostelium, multiple cell types are formed and undergo a coordinated series of morphogenetic movements guided by their adhesive properties and other cellular factors. DdCAD-1 is a unique homophilic cell adhesion molecule encoded by the cadA gene. It is synthesized in the cytoplasm and transported to the plasma membrane by contractile vacuoles. In chimeras developed on soil plates, DdCAD-1-expressing cells showed greater propensity to develop into spores than did cadA-null cells. When development was performed on non-nutrient agar, wild-type cells sorted from the cadA-null cells and moved to the anterior zone. They differentiated mostly into stalk cells and eventually died, whereas the cadA-null cells survived as spores. To assess the role of DdCAD-1 in this novel behavior of wild-type and mutant cells, cadA-null cells were rescued by the ectopic expression of DdCAD-1-GFP. Morphological studies have revealed major spatiotemporal changes in the subcellular distribution of DdCAD-1 during development. Whereas DdCAD-1 became internalized in most cells in the post-aggregation stages, it was prominent in the contact regions of anterior cells. Cell sorting was also restored in cadA(-) slugs by exogenous recombinant DdCAD-1. Remarkably, DdCAD-1 remained on the surface of anterior cells, whereas it was internalized in the posterior cells. Additionally, DdCAD-1-expressing cells migrated slower than cadA(-) cells and sorted to the anterior region of chimeric slugs. These results show that DdCAD-1 influences the sorting behavior of cells in slugs by its differential distribution on the prestalk and prespore cells.     

Disruption of the gene encoding the cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 leads to aberrant cell sorting and cell-type proportioning during Dictyostelium development

The cadA gene in Dictyostelium encodes the Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecule DdCAD-1, which is expressed soon after the initiation of development. To investigate the biological role of DdCAD-1, the cadA gene was disrupted by homologous recombination. The cadA-null cells showed a 50% reduction in EDTA-sensitive cell adhesion. The remaining EDTA-sensitive adhesion sites were resistant to dissociation by anti-DdCAD-1 antibody, suggesting that they were distinct adhesion sites. Cells that lacked DdCAD-1 were able to complete development and form fruiting bodies. However, they displayed abnormal slug morphology and culmination was delayed by approximately 6 hours. The yield of spores was reduced by approximately 50%. The proportion of prestalk cells in cadA(-) slugs showed a 2.5-fold increase over the parental strain. When cadA(-) cells were transfected with pcotB::GFP to label prespore cells, aberrant cell-sorting patterns in slugs became apparent. When mutant prestalk cells were mixed with wild-type prespore cells, mutant prestalk cells were unable to return to the anterior position of chimeric slugs, suggesting defects in the sorting mechanism. The wild-type phenotype was restored when cadA(-) cells were transfected with a cadA-expression vector. These results indicate that, in addition to cell-cell adhesion, DdCAD-1 plays a role in cell type proportioning and pattern formation.     

How the Change from FLM to FACS Affected Our Understanding of the G1-Phase of the Cell Cycle

The frequency of labeled mitoses (FLM) method for analyzing cell-cycle phases necessitates a determination of cell-cycle interdivision times and the absolute lengths of the cell-cycle phases. The change to flow sorting (FACS) analysis, a simpler, less labor intensive, and more rapid method, eliminated determinations of absolute phase times, yielding only percents of cells exhibiting particular DNA contents. Without an interdivision time value, conversion of these fractions into absolute phase lengths is not possible. This change in methodology has led to an alteration in how the cell cycle is viewed. The FLM method allowed the conclusion that G1-phase variability resulted from constancy of S and G2 phase lengths. In contrast, with FACS analysis, slow growing cells exhibiting a large fraction of cells with a G1-phase amount of DNA appeared to be “arrested in G1 phase”. The loss of absolute phase length determinations has therefore led to the proposals of G1-phase arrest, G1-phase controls, restriction points, and G0 phase. It is suggested that these G1-phase controls and phenomena require a critical reevaluation in the light of an alternative cell-cycle model that does not require or postulate such G1-phase controls.