Gram Staining Applied to Human Spermatozoa: a Simple Method for Studying Chromatin Condensation Status

Gram staining applied to human spermatozoa from fertile donors is described. The stain revealed populations of Gram-positive and Gram-negative spermatozoa. Data showed a significant and progressive decrease in the percentage of Gram-positive spermatozoa at different times during the chromatin decondensation procedure (SDS-BSA and SDS-EDTA). No significant correlation could be found between Gram staining and other functional tests used for spermatozoa; only the aniline blue staining test showed a poor correlation. Our study demonstrates that normal spermatozoa with regular chromatin condensation appear Gram-positive, while spermatozoa with altered chromatin condensation appear Gramnegative.     

Distinction of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria using a colorimetric microbial viability assay based on the reduction of water-soluble tetrazolium salts with a selection medium

Bacteria are fundamentally divided into two groups: Gram-positive and Gram-negative. Although the Gram stain and other techniques can be used to differentiate these groups, some issues exist with traditional approaches. In this study, we developed a method for differentiating Gram-positive and -negative bacteria using a colorimetric microbial viability assay based on the reduction of the tetrazolium salt {2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt} (WST-8) via 2-methyl-1,4-napthoquinone with a selection medium. We optimized the composition of the selection medium to allow the growth of Gram-negative bacteria while inhibiting the growth of Gram-positive bacteria. When the colorimetric viability assay was carried out in a selection medium containing 0.5μg/ml crystal violet, 5.0 μg/ml daptomycin, and 5.0μg/ml vancomycin, the reduction in WST-8 by Gram-positive bacteria was inhibited. On the other hand, Gram-negative bacteria produced WST-8-formazan in the selection medium. The proposed method was also applied to determine the Gram staining characteristics of bacteria isolated from various foodstuffs. There was good agreement between the results obtained using the present method and those obtained using a conventional staining method. These results suggest that the WST-8 colorimetric assay with selection medium is a useful technique for accurately differentiating Gram-positive and -negative bacteria.     

Cord factor (trehalose-6-6'-dimycolate) of in vivo-derived Mycobacterium lepraemurium.

Harvests of Mycobacterium lepraemurium obtained from livers of moribund infected mice yielded M. lepraemurium cell walls that were extracted with solvent to provide crude M. lepraemurium cell wall lipids. By solvent fractionation and chromatography on DEAE cellulose and cellulose, a cord factor-like glycolipids contaminated with mycoside C was obtained. Additional solvent treatment provided the purified glycolipid, which was identified as 6,6'-trehalose dimycolate, by infrared and chromatographic comparison with authentic samples from M. tuberculosis, by identification of trehalose and specific mycolates of M. lepraemurium, and by permethylation analysis. This constitutes the first unequivocal identification of cord factor as a product of in vivo-derived mycobacteria.     

Detailed Differentiation of Bacteria by Means of A Mixture of Acid and Basic Dyes at Different pH-Values

As previously reported by the author (1927), a mixture of methylene blue and eosin Y can be used for the differential staining of bacteria. It gives a fairly deep staining of bacteria at about pH 3 and above. Below pH 3 the eosin Y stains bacteria only a very pale pink; at such high H-ion concentration, the eosin is present as undissociated color acid, and for this reason not enough eosin is in solution to stain bacteria. To improve the staining at such reactions, the eosin was replaced by a stronger acid dye, namely acid fuchsin. The mixture of methylene blue medicinal Merck and acid fuchsin can be successfully used at a pH-value as low as 0.8. The method of staining by this new mixture is entirely the same as with the old mixture. It is sensitive enough to detect the difference in the isoelectric points: (1) of the single bacteria from the same pure culture, (2) of different strains of the colon and typhoid organisms. Some strains of the colon organism were found by this method with an isoelectric point at a pH-value as low as that of the Staphylococcus. Others, on the contrary, have their isoelectric point as high in the pH-scale as that of the typhoid organism. The new mixture can also be used for the study of the chemical composition of the different parts of bacterial body. Applying it at a definite pH-value, the author was able to stain differentially polar bodies of the typhoid group and of the diphtheria organism. This new mixture can be recommended in staining of B. diphtheriae as a substitute for Neisser's stain. It is interesting to note that polar bodies of the colon group consist of more alkaline protein than the body of the bacteria itself, i. e., they are stained by acid fuchsin. The polar bodies of the B. diphtheriae on the contrary are composed of more acid protein than the bacterial body; i. e., they are stained by methylene blue. The impossibility of detecting the above mentioned variations in the isoelectric points of bacteria using the Gram method is explained by the absence of pH variations in the latter technic. The differentiation of bacteria by the Gram stain depends chiefly on the varying stability of the compound formed (Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria plus gentian violet and iodine) in the presence of organic solvents, such as alcohol, acetone, etc.     

Use of the Gram stain in microbiology

The Gram stain differentiates bacteria into two fundamental varieties of cells. Bacteria that retain the initial crystal violet stain (purple) are said to be ''Gram-positive,'' whereas those that are decolorized and stain red with carbol fuchsin (or safranin) are said to be ''Gram-negative.'' This staining response is based on the chemical and structural makeup of the cell walls of both varieties of bacteria. Gram-positives have a thick, relatively impermeable wall that resists decolorization and is composed of peptidoglycan and secondary polymers. Gram-negatives have a thin peptidoglycan layer plus an overlying lipid-protein bilayer known as the outer membrane, which can be disrupted by decolorization. Some bacteria have walls of intermediate structure and, although they are officially classified as Gram-positives because of their linage, they stain in a variable manner. One prokaryote domain, the Archaea, have such variability of wall structure that the Gram stain is not a useful differentiating tool.     

The Phenomenon of Gram-Positivity; Its Definition and Some Negative Evidence on the Causative Role of Sulfhydryl Groups

It has been accepted for many decades that a Gram-positive organism is one which retains the primary dye when stained by accepted Gram stain procedures. It has also been known that the iodine step is essential if Gram differentiation is to be obtained. If bacterial cells are treated in such a way that they will retain the primary dye following a Gram staining procedure, regardless of whether or not the iodine step is included, then the mechanism of this dye retention must differ from that which normally is responsible for a Gram-positive state. Similarly, when both the iodine and decolorization steps are omitted, the counter-stain should always replace the primary stain. If it does not, then the mechanism of dye retention would not be normal, and any such dye retention would not be related to the Gram phenomenon. In such cases one is not studying the Gram reaction, but is studying chemical affinities or physical states which produce visually similar but actually unrelated phenomena. Failure to appreciate this has resulted in papers appearing under the guise of studies of the Gram reaction which have little or no relationship to the Gram phenomenon.

In the interest of consistency, these criteria of true Gram-positivity (the necessity of iodine for Gram-positivity with a normal Gram procedure, and the ability of the counterstain to replace the primary dye when both the iodine and decolorization steps are omitted) should be applied to both intact cells and cell-free substances, even though their mechanism of Gram-positivity may differ.

The above criteria have been applied in a study of the sulfhydryl concept of the mecharism of Gram-positivity as proposed by Fischer and Larose. It was found that while the experimental work of Fischer and Larose was reproducible, the supposedly Gram-positive states produced did not possess the characteristics which would identify them as true Gram-positive states. Our results would not support the sulfhydryl concept concerning the mechanism of Gram-positivity.     

革兰氏染色三步法与质量控制

革兰氏染色(Gram stain),是细菌学中一个经常使用和十分重要的方法,自从1884年微生物学家Gram氏发明著名的革兰氏染色法以后,100多年来虽然经过后来学者的几次改进,但都仍然沿用着Gram氏原来的四步法,基本原理也没有改变。最近Allen氏对Ziehl-Neelsen抗酸菌染色法的改进,是一个良好的启示,使我们开始了革兰氏染色三步法的研究并取得了成功。现将我们建立的革兰氏染色三步法与质量控制报告如下。 1 材料和方法 1.1 结晶紫染色液 甲液:结晶紫2g;95％乙醇20ml。 乙液:草酸铵0.8g;蒸馏水80ml。 甲乙二液先分别溶解,然后混合在一起,过滤除去残渣后装入滴瓶中备用。     

利用无传染性耻垢分枝杆菌建立小鼠结核病模型的探索

目的:利用耻垢分枝杆菌(M.smegmatismc2155)建立C57BL/6小鼠结核病模型。方法:每天以高剂量(5×107CFU)耻垢分枝杆菌给C57BL/6小鼠腹腔注射,连续感染4周,检测耻垢分枝杆菌对小鼠的致病性。分别于2周和4周处死小鼠,无菌条件下解剖小鼠取肺、脾脏组织匀浆,进行组织内细菌活力检测;通过嗜酸性染色进行分枝杆菌的鉴定;同时进行病理切片的制备,观察肺和脾脏组织的病理变化;最后进行菌体DNA的提取和基因检测,根据上述指标确定小鼠结核病模型的建立是否成功。结果:腹腔感染小鼠2周后,模型组小鼠只有脾脏组织匀浆液出现抗酸染色阳性菌落,肺部组织未见阳性菌落。腹腔感染小鼠4周后,模型组小鼠肺、脾脏组织匀浆液中均可见大量抗酸染色阳性的菌落;组织病理学观察结果显示:小鼠肺组织主要表现为以中性粒细胞为主的炎性病变;基因检测结果表明:模型组小鼠肺组织匀浆液中可检测到耻垢分枝杆菌特异性3-磷酸甘油醛脱氢酶(gap)基因,而脾脏组织未扩增出耻垢分枝杆菌特异性基因。结论:通过腹腔注射无致病性耻垢分枝杆菌方法,成功建立C57BL/6小鼠结核病发生模型,为结核分枝杆菌与宿主相互作用研究提供安全的疾病模型。     

Volutin as a Substrate of the Gram Reaction

A modified Gram procedure, with the use of an extremely diluted or acidified crystal violet solution, stained only volutin in contrast with nonstaining of the rest of cell in Gram-positive bacteria. The substrate of the Gram reaction is not only a ribonucleic acid-magnesium-protein complex in cytoplasm (Henry and Stacey 1946), but also a metaphosphate-ribonucleic acid complex in volutin and deoxyribonucleic acid in nuclei in Gram-positive cells. The isoelectric-point theory and permeability theory of the Gram stain are unsupported by the experiments.     

Distribution and abundance of Gram-positive bacteria in the environment: development of a group-specific probe

We developed a 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe (S-P-GPos-1200-a-A-13) for the Gram-positive bacteria, confirmed its specificity by database searches and hybridization studies, and investigated the effects of humic acids on membrane hybridizations with this probe. S-P-GPos-1200-a-A-13 was used to estimate the abundance of Gram-positive populations in the bovine rumen and Lake Michigan sediments. This probe should be useful for studies of the environmental distribution of Gram-positive bacteria and the detection of uncultured, phylogenetically Gram-positive bacteria with variable or negative Gram staining reactions, and could serve for Gram staining in some diagnostic settings.     

Variability of the Gram Reaction Report of Committee on Bacteriological Technic,of the Society of American Bacteriologists

The results of a cooperative investigation on the Gram stain are reported. One hundred and twenty slides were made by a single technician in one laboratory and distributed to ten collaborators. Each of these slides bore smears of six organisms, which were known to differ considerably from one another in their behavior to the Gram reaction. Identical directions were sent to all those taking part in the work as to how to perform the staining technic.

In regard to four of the six cultures fairly consistent reports were received from all those taking part in the tests. The other two cultures, however, proved so variable in their reaction toward the staining method that it is impossible to consider them either Gram-positive or Gram-negative. Such organisms must be regarded as belonging to an intermediate group, and should be called Gram-variable.

It is pointed out that these results agree with recent work, such as that of Churchman and of Steam and Steam; also that according to the theory of the latter investigators as to the relation between Gram reaction and the isolectric point of the bacteria, no sharp distinction between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms could be expected.

These considerations are very important when interpreting results of the Gram technic in the study of pure cultures; but they do not invalidate its use in diagnostic work where it is ordinarily employed to distinguish strongly positive from strongly negative organisms.     

Variability of the Gram Reaction Report of Committee on Bacteriological Technic, of the Society of American Bacteriologists

The results of a cooperative investigation on the Gram stain are reported. One hundred and twenty slides were made by a single technician in one laboratory and distributed to ten collaborators. Each of these slides bore smears of six organisms, which were known to differ considerably from one another in their behavior to the Gram reaction. Identical directions were sent to all those taking part in the work as to how to perform the staining technic.

In regard to four of the six cultures fairly consistent reports were received from all those taking part in the tests. The other two cultures, however, proved so variable in their reaction toward the staining method that it is impossible to consider them either Gram-positive or Gram-negative. Such organisms must be regarded as belonging to an intermediate group, and should be called Gram-variable.

It is pointed out that these results agree with recent work, such as that of Churchman and of Steam and Steam; also that according to the theory of the latter investigators as to the relation between Gram reaction and the isolectric point of the bacteria, no sharp distinction between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms could be expected.

These considerations are very important when interpreting results of the Gram technic in the study of pure cultures; but they do not invalidate its use in diagnostic work where it is ordinarily employed to distinguish strongly positive from strongly negative organisms.     

The Gram Stain after More than a Century

The Gram stain, the most important stain in microbiology, was described more than a century ago. Only within the past decade, however, has an understanding of its mechanism emerged. It now seems clear that the cell wall of Gram-positive microorganisms is responsible for retention of a crystal violet:iodine complex. In Gram-negative cells, the staining procedures damage the cell surface resulting in loss of dye complexes. Gram-positive microorganisms require a relatively thick cell wall, irrespective of composition, to retain the dye. Therefore, Gramstainability is a function of the cell wall and is not related to chemistry of cell constituents. This review provides a chronology of the Gram stain and discusses its recently discovered mechanism.     

Nitroquinolones with broad-spectrum antimycobacterial activity in vitro.

During search on quinolonecarboxylic acids we used a facile, convenient two- or three-step procedure to synthesize new quinolone analogs, bearing at the C-7 position alkylamino substituents, and at the C-6 position a fluorine or alternatively a nitro group. The new derivatives were tested against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and against a number of different mycobacteria. In vitro assays showed 1-tert-butyl-7-tert-butylamino-6-nitro-1,4-dihydro-4-quinolone-3-carboxy lic acid to be a potent inhibitor of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus with potencies superior to those of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, used as reference drugs. Some 6-nitroquinolones were found to exert good inhibiting activities against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and various atypical mycobacteria, whereas the 6-fluoro counterparts showed poor or no activity against this bacterium.     

Comparison of NaOH-N-acetyl cysteine and sulfuric acid decontamination methods for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens

We compared the NaOH-N-acetyl cysteine (NaOH-NALC) and the sulfuric acid decontamination procedure in the detection of mycobacteria using the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT). In total 219 sputum specimens were collected from 142 Zambian patients and subjected to mycobacterial culture. One half of the specimen was decontaminated with NaOH-NALC and the other half was decontaminated with sulfuric acid. From the 438 samples a total of 261 (60%) cultures yielded growth of mycobacteria, consisting of 22 different species. The sulfuric acid method was more successful than the NaOH-NALC method in recovering mycobacteria in MGITs (146 versus 115 respectively, p = 0.001). Of the 146 positive mycobacterial cultures recovered after sulfuric acid decontamination 28 were Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 84 nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and 34 acid fast bacterial isolates which could not be identified to the species level. The 115 mycobacteria recovered by the NaOH-NALC method consisted of 34 M. tuberculosis strains, 55 NTM and 26 acid fast bacteria that could not be identified. The most frequently isolated NTM were Mycobacterium lentiflavum and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Comparing the two decontamination methods the recovery of NTM in the sulfuric acid group was significant higher than in the NaOH-NALC group (p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found for the recovery of M. tuberculosis. These results show that the decontamination method used affects the recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria in particular.     

The Mechanism of the Gram Reaction. III. Solubilities of Dye-Iodine Precipitates and Further Studies of Primary Dye Substitutes

Solubilities of dye-iodine precipitates in alcohol and in aqueous safranin solution were determined by direct solubility methods and by photocolorimetric methods. It was found that, increasing precipitate solubility in alcohol or safranin solution gave decreasing differentiation between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Dyes which did not stain the cells well as a primary stain did not give good Gram stains, regardless of the solubilities of their precipitates. Some dyes (typified by methylene blue) which gave relatively alcohol-insoluble iodine precipitates gave inferior Gram differentiation because these precipitates were readily soluble in the safranin counterstain.

Solubilities of precipitates of crystal violet and various iodine substitutes were determined photocolorimetrically. The ability of a substance to replace iodine in the Gram stain correlated with its ability to give a precipitate which was only slightly soluble in alcohol and relatively insoluble in aqueous safranin solution.

It was concluded that the usual Gram reagents are not truly specific for the differentiation. Any dye and mordant could be used if the dye was deeply colored, stained the cells well, and if the precipitate of dye and mordant was only slightly soluble in alcohol and relatively insoluble in the counterstain. These factors, combined with those influencing differences in cell membrane permeability, constitute the most important factors in the Gram stain differentiation.

Studies were made concerning the ability of dyes to substitute for crystal violet in the Gram procedure. Of 29 dye samples reported on here for the first time none proved to be good substitutes for crystal violet.     

The Mechanism of the Gram Reaction I. The Specificity of the Primary Dye

Dyes of all major types were tested for their suitability as the primary dye in the Gram stain. When a counterstain was not used, some dyes of all types were found to differentiate Gram-positive from Gram-negative organisms. When a counterstain was used, these dyes were found to vary greatly in their suitability. Those dyes found to be good substitutes for crystal violet were: Brilliant green, malachite green, basic fuchsin, ethyl violet, Hoffmann's violet, methyl violet B, and Victoria blue R. All are basic triphenylmethane dyes. Acid dyes were generally not suitable. Differences in the reaction of Gram-positive and Gram-negative cells to Gram staining without the use of iodine were observed and discussed but a practical differentiation could not be achieved in this manner. Certain broad aspects of the chemical mechanism of dyes in the gram stain are discussed.     

Use of the Gram stain in microbiology

The Gram stain differentiates bacteria into two fundamental varieties of cells. Bacteria that retain the initial crystal violet stain (purple) are said to be 'Gram-positive,' whereas those that are decolorized and stain red with carbol fuchsin (or safranin) are said to be 'Gram-negative.' This staining response is based on the chemical and structural makeup of the cell walls of both varieties of bacteria. Gram-positives have a thick, relatively impermeable wall that resists decolorization and is composed of peptidoglycan and secondary polymers. Gram-negatives have a thin peptidoglycan layer plus an overlying lipid-protein bilayer known as the outer membrane, which can be disrupted by decolorization. Some bacteria have walls of intermediate structure and, although they are officially classified as Gram-positives because of their linage, they stain in a variable manner. One prokaryote domain, the Archaea, have such variability of wall structure that the Gram stain is not a useful differentiating tool.     

Human toll-like receptors mediate cellular activation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Recent studies have implicated a family of mammalian Toll-like receptors (TLR) in the activation of macrophages by Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial products. We have previously shown that different TLR proteins mediate cellular activation by the distinct CD14 ligands Gram-negative bacterial LPS and mycobacterial glycolipid lipoarabinomannan (LAM). Here we show that viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli activated both Chinese hamster ovary cells and murine macrophages that overexpressed either TLR2 or TLR4. This contrasted with Gram-positive bacteria and Mycobacterium avium, which activated cells via TLR2 but not TLR4. Both virulent and attenuated strains of M. tuberculosis could activate the cells in a TLR-dependent manner. Neither membrane-bound nor soluble CD14 was required for bacilli to activate cells in a TLR-dependent manner. We also assessed whether LAM was the mycobacterial cell wall component responsible for TLR-dependent cellular activation by M. tuberculosis. We found that TLR2, but not TLR4, could confer responsiveness to LAM isolated from rapidly growing mycobacteria. In contrast, LAM isolated from M. tuberculosis or Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin failed to induce TLR-dependent activation. Lastly, both soluble and cell wall-associated mycobacterial factors were capable of mediating activation via distinct TLR proteins. A soluble heat-stable and protease-resistant factor was found to mediate TLR2-dependent activation, whereas a heat-sensitive cell-associated mycobacterial factor mediated TLR4-dependent activation. Together, our data demonstrate that Toll-like receptors can mediate cellular activation by M. tuberculosis via CD14-independent ligands that are distinct from the mycobacterial cell wall glycolipid LAM.     

A Fluorescent Gram Stain for Flow Cytometry and Epifluorescence Microscopy

The fluorescent nucleic acid binding dyes hexidium iodide (HI) and SYTO 13 were used in combination as a Gram stain for unfixed organisms in suspension. HI penetrated gram-positive but not gram-negative organisms, whereas SYTO 13 penetrated both. When the dyes were used together, gram-negative organisms were rendered green fluorescent by SYTO 13; conversely, gram-positive organisms were rendered red-orange fluorescent by HI, which simultaneously quenched SYTO 13 green fluorescence. The technique correctly predicted the Gram status of 45 strains of clinically relevant organisms, including several known to be gram variable. In addition, representative strains of gram-positive anaerobic organisms, normally decolorized during the traditional Gram stain procedure, were classified correctly by this method.Gram’s staining method is considered fundamental in bacterial taxonomy. The outcome of the Gram reaction reflects major differences in the chemical composition and ultrastructure of bacterial cell walls. The Gram stain involves staining a heat-fixed smear of cells with a rosaniline dye such as crystal or methyl violet in the presence of iodine, with subsequent exposure to alcohol or acetone. Organisms that are decolorized by the alcohol or acetone are designated gram negative.Alternative Gram staining techniques have recently been proposed. Sizemore et al. (19) reported on the use of fluorescently labeled wheat germ agglutinin. This lectin binds specifically to N-acetylglucosamine in the peptidoglycan layer of gram-positive bacteria, whereas gram-negative organisms contain an outer membrane that prevents lectin binding. Although simpler and faster than the traditional Gram stain, this method requires heat fixation of organisms.Other Gram stain techniques suitable for live bacteria in suspension have been described. Allman et al. (1) demonstrated that rhodamine 123 (a lipophilic cationic dye) rendered gram-positive bacteria fluorescent, but its uptake by gram-negative organisms was poor. This reduced uptake by gram-negative bacteria was attributed to their outer membranes. The outer membrane can be made more permeable to lipophilic cations by exposure to the chelator EDTA (4). Shapiro (18) took advantage of this fact to form the basis of another Gram stain, one which involved comparing the uptake of a carbocyanine dye before and after permeabilizing organisms with EDTA. All of these methods, however, rely on one-color fluorescence, making analysis of mixed bacterial populations difficult.An alternative to the use of stains is the potassium hydroxide (KOH) test. The method categorizes organisms on the basis of differences in KOH solubility. After exposure to KOH, gram-negative bacteria are more easily disrupted than gram-positive organisms. This technique has been used to classify both aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria, including gram-variable organisms (8). In a study by Halebian et al. (9), however, this technique incorrectly classified several anaerobic strains, giving rise to the recommendation that the method should only be used in conjunction with the traditional Gram stain.In this study we demonstrate a Gram staining technique for unfixed organisms in suspension, by using clinically relevant bacterial strains and organisms notorious for their gram variability. The method uses two fluorescent nucleic acid binding dyes, hexidium iodide (HI) and SYTO 13. Sales literature (11) published by the manufacturers of HI (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, Oreg.), which displays a red fluorescence, suggests that the dye selectively stains gram-positive bacteria. SYTO 13 is one of a group of cell-permeating nucleic acid stains and fluoresces green (11). These dyes have been found to stain DNA and RNA in live or dead eukaryotic cells (16). Both dyes are excited at 490 nm, permitting their use in fluorescence instruments equipped with the most commonly available light sources. We reasoned that a combination of these two dyes applied to mixed bacterial populations would result in all bacteria being labeled, with differential labeling of gram-positive bacteria (HI and SYTO 13) and gram-negative bacteria (SYTO 13 only). The different fluorescence emission wavelengths of the two dyes would ensure differentiation of gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria by either epifluorescence microscopy or flow cytometry when equipped with the appropriate excitation and emission filters. While a commercial Gram stain kit produced by Molecular Probes includes HI and an alternative SYTO dye, SYTO 9, we are unaware of any peer-reviewed publications regarding either its use or its effectiveness with traditionally gram-variable organisms.