Molecular packing and packing defects in helical membrane proteins

The packing of helices spanning lipid bilayers is crucial for the stability and function of alpha-helical membrane proteins. Using a modified Voronoi procedure, we calculated packing densities for helix-helix contacts in membrane spanning domains. Our results show that the transmembrane helices of protein channels and transporters are significantly more loosely packed compared with helices in globular proteins. The observed packing deficiencies of these membrane proteins are also reflected by a higher amount of cavities at functionally important sites. The cavities positioned along the gated pores of membrane channels and transporters are noticeably lined by polar amino acids that should be exposed to the aqueous medium when the protein is in the open state. In contrast, nonpolar amino acids surround the cavities in those protein regions where large rearrangements are supposed to take place, as near the hinge regions of transporters or at restriction sites of protein channels. We presume that the observed deficiencies of helix-helix packing are essential for the helical mobility that sustains the function of many membrane protein channels and transporters.     

Comparison of helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins

Helix-helix interactions are important for the folding, stability, and function of membrane proteins. Here, two independent and complementary methods are used to investigate the nature and distribution of amino acids that mediate helix-helix interactions in membrane and soluble alpha-bundle proteins. The first method characterizes the packing density of individual amino acids in helical proteins based on the van der Waals surface area occluded by surrounding atoms. We have recently used this method to show that transmembrane helices pack more tightly, on average, than helices in soluble proteins. These studies are extended here to characterize the packing of interfacial and noninterfacial amino acids and the packing of amino acids in the interfaces of helices that have either right- or left-handed crossing angles, and either parallel or antiparallel orientations. We show that the most abundant tightly packed interfacial residues in membrane proteins are Gly, Ala, and Ser, and that helices with left-handed crossing angles are more tightly packed on average than helices with right-handed crossing angles. The second method used to characterize helix-helix interactions involves the use of helix contact plots. We find that helices in membrane proteins exhibit a broader distribution of interhelical contacts than helices in soluble proteins. Both helical membrane and soluble proteins make use of a general motif for helix interactions that relies mainly on four residues (Leu, Ala, Ile, Val) to mediate helix interactions in a fashion characteristic of left-handed helical coiled coils. However, a second motif for mediating helix interactions is revealed by the high occurrence and high average packing values of small and polar residues (Ala, Gly, Ser, Thr) in the helix interfaces of membrane proteins. Finally, we show that there is a strong linear correlation between the occurrence of residues in helix-helix interfaces and their packing values, and discuss these results with respect to membrane protein structure prediction and membrane protein stability.     

Helix packing moments reveal diversity and conservation in membrane protein structure

Helical membrane proteins are more tightly packed and the packing interactions are more diverse than those found in helical soluble proteins. Based on a linear correlation between amino acid packing values and interhelical propensity, we propose the concept of a helix packing moment to predict the orientation of helices in helical membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes. We show that the helix packing moment correlates with the helix interfaces of helix dimers of single pass membrane proteins of known structure. Helix packing moments are also shown to help identify the packing interfaces in membrane proteins with multiple transmembrane helices, where a single helix can have multiple contact surfaces. Analyses are described on class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with seven transmembrane helices. We show that the helix packing moments are conserved across the class A family of GPCRs and correspond to key structural contacts in rhodopsin. These contacts are distinct from the highly conserved signature motifs of GPCRs and have not previously been recognized. The specific amino acid types involved in these contacts, however, are not necessarily conserved between subfamilies of GPCRs, indicating that the same protein architecture can be supported by a diverse set of interactions. In GPCRs, as well as membrane channels and transporters, amino acid residues with small side-chains (Gly, Ala, Ser, Cys) allow tight helix packing by mediating strong van der Waals interactions between helices. Closely packed helices, in turn, facilitate interhelical hydrogen bonding of both weakly polar (Ser, Thr, Cys) and strongly polar (Asn, Gln, Glu, Asp, His, Arg, Lys) amino acid residues. We propose the use of the helix packing moment as a complementary tool to the helical hydrophobic moment in the analysis of transmembrane sequences.     

Helix packing in polytopic membrane proteins: role of glycine in transmembrane helix association.

The nature and distribution of amino acids in the helix interfaces of four polytopic membrane proteins (cytochrome c oxidase, bacteriorhodopsin, the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, and the potassium channel of Streptomyces lividans) are studied to address the role of glycine in transmembrane helix packing. In contrast to soluble proteins where glycine is a noted helix breaker, the backbone dihedral angles of glycine in transmembrane helices largely fall in the standard alpha-helical region of a Ramachandran plot. An analysis of helix packing reveals that glycine residues in the transmembrane region of these proteins are predominantly oriented toward helix-helix interfaces and have a high occurrence at helix crossing points. Moreover, packing voids are generally not formed at the position of glycine in folded protein structures. This suggests that transmembrane glycine residues mediate helix-helix interactions in polytopic membrane proteins in a fashion similar to that seen in oligomers of membrane proteins with single membrane-spanning helices. The picture that emerges is one where glycine residues serve as molecular notches for orienting multiple helices in a folded protein complex.     

Comprehensive analysis of the numbers,lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in prokaryotic,eukaryotic and viral integral membrane proteins of high-resolution structure

We report a comprehensive analysis of the numbers, lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in 235 high-resolution structures of integral membrane proteins. The properties of 1551 transmembrane helices in the structures were compared with those obtained by analysis of the same amino acid sequences using topology prediction tools. Explanations for the 81 (5.2%) missing or additional transmembrane helices in the prediction results were identified. Main reasons for missing transmembrane helices were mis-identification of N-terminal signal peptides, breaks in α-helix conformation or charged residues in the middle of transmembrane helices and transmembrane helices with unusual amino acid composition. The main reason for additional transmembrane helices was mis-identification of amphipathic helices, extramembrane helices or hairpin re-entrant loops. Transmembrane helix length had an overall median of 24 residues and an average of 24.9 ± 7.0 residues and the most common length was 23 residues. The overall content of residues in transmembrane helices as a percentage of the full proteins had a median of 56.8% and an average of 55.7 ± 16.0%. Amino acid composition was analysed for the full proteins, transmembrane helices and extramembrane regions. Individual proteins or types of proteins with transmembrane helices containing extremes in contents of individual amino acids or combinations of amino acids with similar physicochemical properties were identified and linked to structure and/or function. In addition to overall median and average values, all results were analysed for proteins originating from different types of organism (prokaryotic, eukaryotic, viral) and for subgroups of receptors, channels, transporters and others.     

Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins

MOTIVATION: The analysis of co-evolving residues has been exhaustively evaluated for the prediction of intramolecular amino acid contacts in soluble proteins. Although a variety of different methods for the detection of these co-evolving residues have been developed, the fraction of correctly predicted contacts remained insufficient for their reliable application in the construction of structural models. Membrane proteins, which constitute between one-fourth and one-third of all proteins in an organism, were only considered in few individual case studies. RESULTS: We present the first general study of correlated mutations in alpha-helical membrane proteins. Using seven different prediction algorithms, we extracted co-evolving residues for 14 membrane proteins having a solved 3D structure. On average, distances between correlated pairs of residues lying on different transmembrane segments were found to be significantly smaller compared to a random prediction. Covariation of residues was frequently found in direct sequence neighborhood to helix-helix contacts. Based on the results obtained from individual prediction methods, we constructed a consensus prediction for every protein in the dataset that combines obtained correlations from different prediction algorithms and simultaneously removes likely false positives. Using this consensus prediction, 53% of all predicted residue pairs were found within one helix turn of an observed helix-helix contact. Based on the combination of co-evolving residues detected with the four best prediction algorithms, interacting helices could be predicted with a specificity of 83% and sensitivity of 42%. AVAILABILITY: http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/helixcorr/     

Prediction of helix-helix contacts and interacting helices in polytopic membrane proteins using neural networks

Despite rapidly increasing numbers of available 3D structures, membrane proteins still account for less than 1% of all structures in the Protein Data Bank. Recent high-resolution structures indicate a clearly broader structural diversity of membrane proteins than initially anticipated, motivating the development of reliable structure prediction methods specifically tailored for this class of molecules. One important prediction target capturing all major aspects of a protein's 3D structure is its contact map. Our analysis shows that computational methods trained to predict residue contacts in globular proteins perform poorly when applied to membrane proteins. We have recently published a method to identify interacting alpha-helices in membrane proteins based on the analysis of coevolving residues in predicted transmembrane regions. Here, we present a substantially improved algorithm for the same problem, which uses a newly developed neural network approach to predict helix-helix contacts. In addition to the input features commonly used for contact prediction of soluble proteins, such as windowed residue profiles and residue distance in the sequence, our network also incorporates features that apply to membrane proteins only, such as residue position within the transmembrane segment and its orientation toward the lipophilic environment. The obtained neural network can predict contacts between residues in transmembrane segments with nearly 26% accuracy. It is therefore the first published contact predictor developed specifically for membrane proteins performing with equal accuracy to state-of-the-art contact predictors available for soluble proteins. The predicted helix-helix contacts were employed in a second step to identify interacting helices. For our dataset consisting of 62 membrane proteins of solved structure, we gained an accuracy of 78.1%. Because the reliable prediction of helix interaction patterns is an important step in the classification and prediction of membrane protein folds, our method will be a helpful tool in compiling a structural census of membrane proteins.     

Transmembrane and water-soluble helix bundles display reverse patterns of surface roughness.

Amino acid exposure and surface roughness were calculated for 12 helices from three transmembrane alpha-helix bundles and 13 helices from seven water-soluble alpha-helix bundles. Transmembrane helix bundles have relatively rough surfaces exposed to the lipid bilayer hydrocarbon chains and relatively smooth surfaces along helix-helix interfaces. This pattern is the reverse of what occurs in water-soluble helix bundles, where relatively rough surfaces are at the helix-helix interfaces and relatively smooth surfaces are exposed to water. The relatively rough exposed surfaces and buried smooth surfaces of transmembrane helices are likely to contribute to the stability of transmembrane helical bundles in a phospholipid environment.     

Why are polar residues within the membrane core evolutionary conserved?

Here, we present a study of polar residues within the membrane core of alpha-helical membrane proteins. As expected, polar residues are less frequent in the membrane than expected. Further, most of these residues are buried within the interior of the protein and are only rarely exposed to lipids. However, the polar groups often border internal water filled cavities, even if the rest of the sidechain is buried. A survey of their functional roles in known structures showed that the polar residues are often directly involved in binding of small compounds, especially in channels and transporters, but other functions including proton transfer, catalysis, and selectivity have also been attributed to these proteins. Among the polar residues histidines often interact with prosthetic groups in photosynthetic- and oxidoreductase-related proteins, whereas prolines often are required for conformational changes of the proteins. Indeed, the polar residues in the membrane core are more conserved than other residues in the core, as well as more conserved than polar residues outside the membrane. The reason is twofold; they are often (i) buried in the interior of the protein and (ii) directly involved in the function of the proteins. Finally, a method to identify which polar residues are present within the membrane core directly from protein sequences was developed. Applying the method to the set of all human membrane proteins the prediction indicates that polar residues were most frequent among active transporter proteins and GPCRs, whereas infrequent in families with few transmembrane regions, such as non-GPCR receptors.     

Defining the structural basis for assembly of a transmembrane cytochrome

To define the structural basis for cofactor binding to membrane proteins, we introduce a manageable model system, which allows us, for the first time, to study the influence of individual transmembrane helices and of single amino acid residues on the assembly of a transmembrane cytochrome. In vivo as well as in vitro analyses indicate central roles of single amino acid residues for either interaction of the transmembrane helices or for binding of the cofactor. The results clearly show that interaction of the PsbF transmembrane helix is independent from binding of the heme cofactor. On the other hand, binding of the cofactor highly depends on helix-helix interactions. By site-directed mutagenesis critical amino acid residues were identified, which are involved in the assembly of a functional transmembrane cytochrome. Especially, a highly conserved glycine residue is critical for interaction of the transmembrane helices and assembly of the cytochrome. Based on the two-stage-model of alpha-helical membrane protein folding, the presented results clearly indicate a third stage of membrane protein folding, in which a cofactor binds to a pre-assembled transmembrane protein.     

Position-dependence of stabilizing polar interactions of asparagine in transmembrane helical bundles

Recent studies with model peptides and statistical analyses of the crystal structures of membrane proteins have shown that buried polar interactions contribute significantly to the stabilization of the three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins. Here, we probe how the location of these polar groups along the transmembrane helices affect their free energies of interaction. Asn residues were placed singly and in pairs at three positions within a model transmembrane helix, which had previously been shown to support the formation of trimers in micelles. The model helix was designed to form a transmembrane coiled coil, with Val side chains at the "a" positions of the heptad repeat. Variants of this peptide were prepared in which an Asn residue was introduced at one or more of the "a" positions, and their free energies of association were determined by analytical ultracentrifugation. When placed near the middle of the transmembrane helix, the formation of trimers was stabilized by at least -2.0 kcal/mol per Asn side chain. When the Asn was placed at the interface between the hydrophobic and polar regions of the peptide, the substitution was neither stabilizing nor destabilizing (0.0 +/- 0.5 kcal/mol of monomer). Finally, it has previously been shown that a Val-for-Asn mutation in a water-soluble coiled coil destabilizes the structure by approximately 1.5 kcal/mol of monomer [Acharya, A., et al. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 14122-14131]. Thus, the headgroup region of a micelle appears to have a conformational impact intermediate between that of bulk water and the apolar region of micelle. A similarly large dependence on the location of the polar residues was found in a statistical survey of helical transmembrane proteins. The tendency of different types of residues to be buried in the interiors versus being exposed to lipids was analyzed. Asn and Gln show a very strong tendency to be buried when they are located near the middle of a transmembrane helix. However, when placed near the ends of transmembrane helices, they show little preference for the surface versus the interior of the protein. These data show that Asn side chains within the apolar region of the transmembrane helix provide a significantly larger driving force for association than Asn residues near the apolar/polar interface. Thus, although polar interactions are able to strongly stabilize the folding of membrane proteins, the energetics of association depend on their location within the hydrophobic region of a transmembrane helix.     

Thermostability of membrane protein helix-helix interaction elucidated by statistical analysis

A prerequisite for the survival of (micro)organisms at high temperatures is an adaptation of protein stability to extreme environmental conditions. In contrast to soluble proteins, where many factors have already been identified, the mechanisms by which the thermostability of membrane proteins is enhanced are almost unknown. The hydrophobic membrane environment constrains possible stabilizing factors for transmembrane domains, so that a difference might be expected between soluble and membrane proteins. Here we present sequence analysis of predicted transmembrane helices of the genomes from eight thermophilic and 12 mesophilic organisms. A comparison of the amino acid compositions indicates that more polar residues can be found in the transmembrane helices of thermophilic organisms. Particularly, the amino acids aspartic acid and glutamic acid replace the corresponding amides. Cysteine residues are found to be significantly decreased by about 70% in thermophilic membrane domains suggesting a non-specific function of most cysteine residues in transmembrane domains of mesophilic organisms. By a pair-motif analysis of the two sets of transmembrane helices, we found that the small residues glycine and serine contribute more to transmembrane helix-helix interactions in thermophilic organisms. This may result in a tighter packing of the helices allowing more hydrogen bond formation.     

Coils in the membrane core are conserved and functionally important

With the increasing number of available α-helical transmembrane (TM) protein structures, the traditional picture of membrane proteins has been challenged. For example, reentrant regions, which enter and exit the membrane at the same side, and interface helices, which lie parallel with the membrane in the membrane-water interface, are common. Furthermore, TM helices are frequently kinked, and their length and tilt angle vary. Here, we systematically analyze 7% of all residues within the deep membrane core that are in coil state. These coils can be found in TM-helix kinks as major breaks in TM helices and as parts of reentrant regions.Coil residues are significantly more conserved than other residues. Due to the polar character of the coil backbone, they are either buried or located near aqueous channels. Coil residues are frequently found within channels and transporters, where they introduce the flexibility and polarity required for transport across the membrane. Therefore, we believe that coil residues in the membrane core, while constituting a structural anomaly, are essential for the function of proteins.     

Sequence dependence of BNIP3 transmembrane domain dimerization implicates side-chain hydrogen bonding and a tandem GxxxG motif in specific helix-helix interactions

The transmembrane domain of the pro-apoptotic protein BNIP3 self-associates strongly in membranes and in detergents. We have used site-directed mutagenesis to analyze the sequence dependence of BNIP3 transmembrane domain dimerization, from which we infer the physical basis for strong and specific helix-helix interactions in this system. Hydrophobic substitutions identify six residues as critical to dimerization, and the pattern of sensitive residues suggests that the BNIP3 helices interact at a right-handed crossing angle. Based on the dimerization propensities of single point mutants, we propose that: polar residues His173 and Ser172 make inter-monomer hydrogen bonds to one another through their side-chains; Ala176, Gly180, and Gly184 form a tandem GxxxG motif that allows close approach of the helices; and Ile183 makes inter-monomer van der Waals contacts. Since neither the tandem GxxxG motif nor the hydrogen bonding pair is sufficient to drive dimerization, our results demonstrate the importance of sequence context for either hydrogen bonding or GxxxG motif involvement in BNIP3 transmembrane helix-helix interactions. In this study, hydrophobic substitutions away from the six interfacial positions have almost no effect on dimerization, confirming the expectation that hydrophobic replacements affect helix-helix interactions only if they interfere with packing or hydrogen bonding by interfacial residues. However, changes to slightly polar residues are somewhat disruptive even when located away from the interface, and the degree of disruption correlates with the decrease in hydrophobicity. Changing the hydrophobicity of the BNIP3 transmembrane domain alters its helicity and protection of its backbone amides. We suggest that polar substitutions decrease the fraction of dimer by stabilizing an unfolded monomeric state of the transmembrane span, rather than by affecting helix-helix interactions. This result has broad implications for interpreting the sequence dependence of membrane protein stability in detergents.     

Sequence specificity in the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices.

While several reports have suggested a role for helix-helix interactions in membrane protein oligomerization, there are few direct biochemical data bearing on this subject. Here, using mutational analysis, we show that dimerization of the transmembrane alpha-helix of glycophorin A in a detergent environment is spontaneous and highly specific. Very subtle changes in the side-chain structure at certain sensitive positions disrupt the helix-helix association. These sensitive positions occur at approximately every 3.9 residues along the helix, consistent with their comprising the interface of a closely fit transmembranous supercoil of alpha-helices. By contrast with other reported cases of interactions between transmembrane helices, the set of interfacial residues in this case contains no highly polar groups. Amino acids with aliphatic side chains define much of the interface, indicating that precise packing interactions between the helices may provide much of the energy for association. These data highlight the potential general importance of specific interactions between the hydrophobic anchors of integral membrane proteins.     

Structural features of transmembrane helices

A total of 160 transmembrane helices of 15 non-homologous high-resolution X-ray protein structures have been analyzed in respect of their structural features. The dihedral angles and hydrogen bonds of the helical sections that span the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer have been investigated. The Ramachandran plot of protein channels and solute transporters exhibit a significant shift Delta (phi- and psi-angles) of Delta mean (+4.5 degrees and -5.4 degrees ), compared to a reference group of 151 alpha-helices of the same average length derived from water-soluble globular proteins. At the C-termini of transmembrane helices structural motifs equivalent to the Gly-caps of helices in globular proteins have been found, with two third of the transmembrane Gly-caps taking up a primary structure that is typically not found at helix termini exposed to a polar solvent. The structural particularities reported here are relevant for the three-dimensional modelling of membrane protein structures.     

Phenylalanine promotes interaction of transmembrane domains via GxxxG motifs

Interactions of transmembrane helices play a crucial role in the folding and oligomerisation of integral membrane proteins. In order to uncover novel sequence motifs mediating these interactions, we randomised one face of a transmembrane helix with a set of non-polar or moderately polar amino acids. Those sequences capable of self-interaction upon integration into bacterial inner membranes were selected by means of the ToxR/POSSYCCAT system. A comparison between low/medium-affinity and high-affinity sequences reveals that high-affinity sequences are strongly enriched in phenylalanine residues that are frequently observed at the − 3 position of GxxxG motifs, thus yielding FxxGxxxG motifs. Mutation of Phe or GxxxG in selected sequences significantly reduces self-interaction of the transmembrane domains without affecting their efficiency of membrane integration. Conversely, grafting FxxGxxxG onto unrelated transmembrane domains strongly enhances their interaction. Further, we find that FxxGxxxG is significantly over-represented in transmembrane domains of bitopic membrane proteins. The same motif contributes to self-interaction of the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein transmembrane domain. We conclude that Phe stabilises membrane-spanning GxxxG motifs. This is one example of how the role of certain side-chains in helix-helix interfaces is modulated by sequence context.     

A mutational study of transmembrane helix-helix interactions

Diverse methods have been developed and applied in the recent years to study interaction of transmembrane alpha-helices and often interaction of single transmembrane helices is followed on SDS-gels. Here we compare two measurements of the stability of a transmembrane helix-helix interaction, and the stability of the PsbF transmembrane helix dimer was determined in a biological membrane as well as in SDS. The observations described in this study demonstrate that the environment, in which a transmembrane helix interaction is studied, can be very critical and detergent properties can significantly influence transmembrane helix interactions, especially, when the transmembrane domain contains strongly polar residues.     

Empirical lipid propensities of amino acid residues in multispan alpha helical membrane proteins

Characterizing the interactions between amino acid residues and lipid molecules is important for understanding the assembly of transmembrane helices and for studying membrane protein folding. In this study we develop TMLIP (TransMembrane helix-LIPid), an empirically derived propensity of individual residue types to face lipid membrane based on statistical analysis of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. Lipid accessibilities of amino acid residues within the transmembrane (TM) region of 29 structures of helical membrane proteins are studied with a spherical probe of radius of 1.9 A. Our results show that there are characteristic preferences for residues to face the headgroup region and the hydrocarbon core region of lipid membrane. Amino acid residues Lys, Arg, Trp, Phe, and Leu are often found exposed at the headgroup regions of the membrane, where they have high propensity to face phospholipid headgroups and glycerol backbones. In the hydrocarbon core region, the strongest preference for interacting with lipids is observed for Ile, Leu, Phe and Val. Small and polar amino acid residues are usually buried inside helical bundles and are strongly lipophobic. There is a strong correlation between various hydrophobicity scales and the propensity of a given residue to face the lipids in the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer. Our data suggest a possibly significant contribution of the lipophobic effect to the folding of membrane proteins. This study shows that membrane proteins have exceedingly apolar exteriors rather than highly polar interiors. Prediction of lipid-facing surfaces of boundary helices using TMLIP1 results in a 54% accuracy, which is significantly better than random (25% accuracy). We also compare performance of TMLIP with another lipid propensity scale, kPROT, and with several hydrophobicity scales using hydrophobic moment analysis.     

Caveolin-Na/K-ATPase interactions: Role of transmembrane topology in non-genomic steroid signal transduction

Progesterone and its polar metabolite(s) trigger the meiotic divisions in the amphibian oocyte through a non-genomic signaling system at the plasma membrane. Published site-directed mutagenesis studies of ouabain binding and progesterone-ouabain competition studies indicate that progesterone binds to a 23 amino acid extracellular loop of the plasma membrane α-subunit of Na/K-ATPase. Integral membrane proteins such as caveolins are reported to form Na/K-ATPase-peptide complexes essential for signal transduction. We have characterized the progesterone-induced Na/K-ATPase-caveolin (CAV-1)-steroid 5α-reductase interactions initiating the meiotic divisions. Peptide sequence analysis algorithms indicate that CAV-1 contains two plasma membrane spanning helices, separated by as few as 1-2 amino acid residues at the cell surface. The CAV-1 scaffolding domain, reported to interact with CAV-1 binding (CB) motifs in signaling proteins, overlaps transmembrane (TM) helix 1. The α-subunit of Na/K-ATPase (10 TM helices) contains double CB motifs within TM-1 and TM-10. Steroid 5α-reductase (6 TM helices), an initial step in polar steroid formation, contains CB motifs overlapping TM-1 and TM-6. Computer analysis predicts that interaction between antipathic strands may bring CB motifs and scaffolding domains into close proximity, initiating allostearic changes. Progesterone binding to the α-subunit may thus facilitate CB motif:CAV-1 interaction, which in turn induces helix-helix interaction and generates both a signaling cascade and formation of polar steroids.