Yersinia enterocolitica exploits different pathways to accomplish adhesion and toxin injection into host cells

The current paradigm suggests that Yersinia enterocolitica (Ye) adheres to host cells via the outer membrane proteins Yersinia adhesin A (YadA) or invasin (Inv) to facilitate injection of Yops by the type III secretion system. In this process Inv binds directly to β1 integrins of host cells while YadA may bind indirectly via extracellular matrix proteins to β1 integrins. Here we challenged this paradigm and investigated the requirements for Yop injection. We demonstrate that Inv‐ but not YadA‐mediated adhesion depends on β1 integrin binding and activation, and that tight adhesion is a prerequisite for Yop injection. By means of novel transgenic cell lines, shRNA approaches and RGD peptides, we found that YadA, in contrast to Inv, may use a broad host cell receptor repertoire for host cell adhesion. In the absence of β1 integrins, YadA mediates Yop injection by interaction with αV integrins in cooperation with yet unknown cofactors expressed by epithelial cells, but not fibroblasts. Electron microscopic and flow chamber studies revealed that a defined intimate contact area between Ye and host cells resulting in adhesion forces resisting shear stress is required for Yop injection. Thus, the indirect binding of YadA to a broad extracellular matrix (ECM) binding host cell receptor repertoire of different cell types makes YadA a versatile tool to ensure Yop injection. In conclusion, given the differential expression of the outer membrane proteins Inv and YadA in the course of Ye infection and differential expression of integrins by various host cell populations, the data demonstrate that Ye is flexibly armed to accomplish Yop injection in different host cell types, a central event in its immune evasion strategy.     

Protein composition of 6K2‐induced membrane structures formed during Potato virus A infection

The definition of the precise molecular composition of membranous replication compartments is a key to understanding the mechanisms of virus multiplication. Here, we set out to investigate the protein composition of the potyviral replication complexes. We purified the potyviral 6K2 protein‐induced membranous structures from Potato virus A (PVA)‐infected Nicotiana benthamiana plants. For this purpose, the 6K2 protein, which is the main inducer of potyviral membrane rearrangements, was expressed in fusion with an N‐terminal Twin‐Strep‐tag and Cerulean fluorescent protein (SC6K) from the infectious PVA cDNA. A non‐tagged Cerulean‐6K2 (C6K) virus and the SC6K protein alone in the absence of infection were used as controls. A purification scheme exploiting discontinuous sucrose gradient centrifugation followed by Strep‐tag‐based affinity chromatography was developed. Both (+)‐ and (–)‐strand PVA RNA and viral protein VPg were co‐purified specifically with the affinity tagged PVA‐SC6K. The purified samples, which contained individual vesicles and membrane clusters, were subjected to mass spectrometry analysis. Data analysis revealed that many of the detected viral and host proteins were either significantly enriched or fully specifically present in PVA‐SC6K samples when compared with the controls. Eight of eleven potyviral proteins were identified with high confidence from the purified membrane structures formed during PVA infection. Ribosomal proteins were identified from the 6K2‐induced membranes only in the presence of a replicating virus, reinforcing the tight coupling between replication and translation. A substantial number of proteins associating with chloroplasts and several host proteins previously linked with potyvirus replication complexes were co‐purified with PVA‐derived SC6K, supporting the conclusion that the host proteins identified in this study may have relevance in PVA replication.     

Isolation, folding and structural investigations of the amino acid transporter OEP16

Membrane proteins compose more than 30% of all proteins in the living cell. However, many membrane proteins have low abundance in the cell and cannot be isolated from natural sources in concentrations suitable for structure analysis. The overexpression, reconstitution, and stabilization of membrane proteins are complex and remain a formidable challenge in membrane protein characterization. Here we describe a novel, in vitro folding procedure for a cation-selective channel protein, the outer envelope membrane protein 16 (OEP16) of pea chloroplast, overexpressed in Escherichia coli in the form of inclusion bodies. The protein is purified and then folded with detergent on a Ni–NTA affinity column. Final concentrations of reconstituted OEP16 of up to 24 mg/ml have been achieved, which provides samples that are sufficient for structural studies by NMR and crystallography. Reconstitution of OEP16 in detergent micelles was monitored by circular dichroism, fluorescence, and NMR spectroscopy. Tryptophan fluorescence spectra of heterologous expressed OEP16 in micelles are similar to spectra of functionally active OEP16 in liposomes, which indicates folding of the membrane protein in detergent micelles. CD spectroscopy studies demonstrate a folded protein consisting primarily of α-helices. ¹⁵N-HSQC NMR spectra also provide evidence for a folded protein. We present here a convenient, effective and quantitative method to screen large numbers of conditions for optimal protein stability by using microdialysis chambers in combination with fluorescence spectroscopy. Recent collection of multidimensional NMR data at 500, 600 and 800 MHz demonstrated that the protein is suitable for structure determination by NMR and stable for weeks during data collection.     

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YopD mutants that genetically separate effector protein translocation from host membrane disruption

The Yersinia type III secretion system (T3SS) translocates Yop effector proteins into host cells to manipulate immune defenses such as phagocytosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The T3SS translocator proteins YopB and YopD form pores in host membranes, facilitating Yop translocation. While the YopD amino and carboxy termini participate in pore formation, the role of the YopD central region between amino acids 150–227 remains unknown. We assessed the contribution of this region by generating Y. pseudotuberculosis yopD_Δ150–170 and yopD_Δ207–227 mutants and analyzing their T3SS functions. These strains exhibited wild‐type levels of Yop secretion in vitro and enabled robust pore formation in macrophages. However, the yopD_Δ150–170 and yopD_Δ207–227 mutants were defective in Yop translocation into CHO cells and splenocyte‐derived neutrophils and macrophages. These data suggest that YopD‐mediated host membrane disruption and effector Yop translocation are genetically separable activities requiring distinct protein domains. Importantly, the yopD_Δ150–170 and yopD_Δ207–227 mutants were defective in Yop‐mediated inhibition of macrophage cell death and ROS production in neutrophil‐like cells, and were attenuated in disseminated Yersinia infection. Therefore, the ability of the YopD central region to facilitate optimal effector protein delivery into phagocytes, and therefore robust effector Yop function, is important for Yersinia virulence.     

Variation of the Detergent-Binding Capacity and Phospholipid Content of Membrane Proteins When Purified in Different Detergents

Purified membrane proteins are ternary complexes consisting of protein, lipid, and detergent. Information about the amounts of detergent and endogenous phospholipid molecules bound to purified membrane proteins is largely lacking. In this systematic study, three model membrane proteins of different oligomeric states were purified in nine different detergents at commonly used concentrations and characterized biochemically and biophysically. Detergent-binding capacities and phospholipid contents of the model proteins were determined and compared. The insights on ternary complexes obtained from the experimental results, when put into a general context, are summarized as follows. 1), The amount of detergent and 2) the amount of endogenous phospholipids bound to purified membrane proteins are dependent on the size of the hydrophobic lipid-accessible protein surface areas and the physicochemical properties of the detergents used. 3), The size of the detergent and lipid belt surrounding the hydrophobic lipid-accessible surface of purified membrane proteins can be tuned by the appropriate choice of detergent. 4), The detergents n-nonyl-β-D-glucopyranoside and Cymal-5 have exceptional delipidating effects on ternary complexes. 5), The types of endogenous phospholipids bound to membrane proteins can vary depending on the detergent used for solubilization and purification. 6), Furthermore, we demonstrate that size-exclusion chromatography can be a suitable method for estimating the molecular mass of ternary complexes. The findings presented suggest a strategy to control and tune the numbers of detergent and endogenous phospholipid molecules bound to membrane proteins. These two parameters are potentially important for the successul crystallization of membrane proteins for structure determination by crystallographic approaches.     

The effect of simvastatin on the proteome of detergent‐resistant membrane domains: Decreases of specific proteins previously related to cytoskeleton regulation,calcium homeostasis and cell fate

Cell death induced by over‐activation of glutamate receptors occurs in different neuropathologies. Cholesterol depletors protect from neurotoxic over‐activation of glutamate receptors, and we have recently reported that this neuroprotection is associated with a reduction of the N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate subtype of glutamate receptors in detergent‐resistant membrane domains (DRM). In the present study we used comparative proteomics to further identify which proteins, besides the N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate receptor, change its percentage of association to DRM after treatment of neurons with simvastatin. We detected 338 spots in neuronal DRM subjected to 2‐DE; eleven of these spots changed its intensity after treatment with simvastatin. All 11 differential spots showed reduced intensity in simvastatin‐treated samples and were identified as adipocyte plasma membrane associated protein, enolase, calretinin, coronin 1a, f‐actin capping protein α1, f‐actin capping protein α2, heat shock cognate protein 71, malate dehydrogenase, n‐myc downregulated gene 1, prohibitin 2, Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor, translationally controlled tumor protein and voltage dependent anion selective channel protein 1. The proteins tested colocalized with the lipid raft marker caveolin‐1. Interestingly, the proteins we have identified in the present study had been previously reported to play a role in cell fate and, thus, they might represent novel targets for neuroprotection.     

Proteomic analysis of membrane proteins expressed specifically in pluripotent murine embryonic stem cells

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are established from the inner cell mass of preimplantation embryos, are capable of self‐renewal, and exhibit pluripotency. Given these unique properties, ESCs are expected to have therapeutic potential in regenerative medicine and as a powerful tool for in vitro differentiation studies of stem cells. Various growth factors and extracellular matrix components regulate the pluripotency and differentiation of ESC progenies. Thus, the cell surface receptors that bind these regulatory factors are crucial for the precise regulation of stem cells. To identify membrane proteins that are involved in the regulation of pluripotent stem cells, the membrane proteins of murine ESCs cultured with or without leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) were purified and analyzed by quantitative proteomics. 2‐D PAGE‐based analysis using fluorescently labeled proteins and shotgun‐based analysis with isotope‐labeled peptides identified 338 proteins, including transmembrane, membrane‐binding, and extracellular proteins, which were expressed specifically in pluripotent or differentiated murine ESCs. Functions of the identified proteins revealed cell adhesion molecules, channels, and receptors, which are expected to play important roles in the maintenance of murine ESC pluripotency. Membrane proteins that are expressed in pluripotent ESCs but not in differentiated cells such as Slc16a1 and Bsg could be useful for the selection of the stem cells in vitro.     

Characterization of the protein import apparatus in isolated outer envelopes of chloroplasts

Isolated outer envelope membrane from pea (Pisum sativum L.) chloroplasts can be used in vitro to study binding and partial translocation of precursor proteins destined for the inside of the organelle. Efficient binding to a receptor protein on the outside of the membrane vesicle and generation of a translocation intermediate depends strictly on the presence of ATP. Protease treatment of the translocation intermediate demonstrates its insertion into the membrane. The membrane-inserted precursor protein cannot be extracted by 1 M NaCl and is also NaOH resistant to a large extent. Mild solubilization of outer envelope membranes by detergent resulted in the isolation of a complex which still contained the precursor protein. We have identified a constitutively expressed homologue hsc 70 as part of this membrane complex. Antibodies against hsp 70 (inducible heat shock protein 70) were able to immuno-precipitate the complex bound precursor protein. A second protein of 86 kDa molecular weight (OEP 86) from the outer envelope membrane was also identified as a major component of this complex.     

YopD of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is translocated into the cytosol of HeLa epithelial cells: evidence of a structural domain necessary for translocation

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YopB and YopD proteins are essential for translocation of Yop effector proteins into the target cell cytosol. YopB is suggested to mediate pore formation in the target cell plasma membrane, allowing translocation of Yop effector proteins, although the function of YopD is unclear. To investigate the role in translocation for YopD, a mutant strain in Y. pseudotuberculosis was constructed containing an in frame deletion of essentially the entire yopD gene. As shown recently for the Y. pestis YopD protein, we found that the in vitro low calcium response controlling virulence gene expression was negatively regulated by YopD. This yopD null mutant (YPIII/pIB621) was also non-cytotoxic towards HeLa cell monolayers, supporting the role for YopD in the translocation process. Although other constituents of the Yersinia translocase apparatus (YopB, YopK and YopN) are not translocated into the host cell cytosol, fractionation of infected HeLa cells allowed us to identify the cytosolic localization of YopD by the wild-type strain (YPIII/pIB102), but not by strains defective in either YopD or YopB. YopD was also identified by immunofluorescence in the cytoplasm of HeLa cell monolayers infected with a multiple yop mutant strain (YPIII/pIB29MEKA). These results demonstrate a dual function for YopD in negative regulation of Yop production and Yop effector translocation, including the YopD protein itself. To investigate whether an amphipathic domain near the C-terminus of YopD is involved in the translocation process, a mutant strain (YPIII/pIB155ΔD_278–292) was constructed that is devoid of this region. Phenotypically, this small in frame ΔyopD_278–292 deletion mutant was indistinguishable from the yopD null mutant. The truncated YopD protein and Yop effectors were not translocated into the cytosol of HeLa cell monolayers infected with this mutant. The comparable regulatory and translocation phenotypes displayed by the small in frame ΔyopD_278–292 deletion and ΔyopD null mutants suggest that regulation of Yop synthesis and Yop translocation are intimately coupled. We present an intriguing scenario to the Yersinia infection process that highlights the need for polarized translocation of YopD to specifically establish translocation of Yop effectors. These observations are contrary to previous suggestions that members of the translocase apparatus were not translocated into the host cell cytosol.     

Development of a full‐length human protein production pipeline

There are many proteomic applications that require large collections of purified protein, but parallel production of large numbers of different proteins remains a very challenging task. To help meet the needs of the scientific community, we have developed a human protein production pipeline. Using high‐throughput (HT) methods, we transferred the genes of 31 full‐length proteins into three expression vectors, and expressed the collection as N‐terminal HaloTag fusion proteins in Escherichia coli and two commercial cell‐free (CF) systems, wheat germ extract (WGE) and HeLa cell extract (HCE). Expression was assessed by labeling the fusion proteins specifically and covalently with a fluorescent HaloTag ligand and detecting its fluorescence on a LabChip^® GX microfluidic capillary gel electrophoresis instrument. This automated, HT assay provided both qualitative and quantitative assessment of recombinant protein. E. coli was only capable of expressing 20% of the test collection in the supernatant fraction with ≥20 μg yields, whereas CF systems had ≥83% success rates. We purified expressed proteins using an automated HaloTag purification method. We purified 20, 33, and 42% of the test collection from E. coli, WGE, and HCE, respectively, with yields ≥1 μg and ≥90% purity. Based on these observations, we have developed a triage strategy for producing full‐length human proteins in these three expression systems.     

Optimized small‐molecule pull‐downs define MLBP1 as an acyl‐lipid‐binding protein

Abscisic acid (ABA) receptors belong to the START domain superfamily, which encompasses ligand‐binding proteins present in all kingdoms of life. START domain proteins contain a central binding pocket that, depending on the protein, can couple ligand binding to catalytic, transport or signaling functions. In Arabidopsis, the best characterized START domain proteins are the 14 PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptors, while the other members of the superfamily do not have assigned ligands. To address this, we used affinity purification of biotinylated proteins expressed transiently in Nicotiana benthamiana coupled to untargeted LC‐MS to identify candidate binding ligands. We optimized this method using ABA–PYL interactions and show that ABA co‐purifies with wild‐type PYL5 but not a binding site mutant. The K_d of PYL5 for ABA is 1.1 μm , which suggests that the method has sufficient sensitivity for many ligand–protein interactions. Using this method, we surveyed a set of 37 START domain‐related proteins, which resulted in the identification of ligands that co‐purified with MLBP1 (At4G01883) or MLP165 (At1G35260). Metabolite identification and the use of authentic standards revealed that MLBP1 binds to monolinolenin, which we confirmed using recombinant MLBP1. Monolinolenin also co‐purified with MLBP1 purified from transgenic Arabidopsis, demonstrating that the interaction occurs in a native context. Thus, deployment of this relatively simple method allowed us to define a protein–metabolite interaction and better understand protein–ligand interactions in plants.     

Production and biophysical characterization of the CorA transporter from Methanosarcina mazei

We report here a general strategy to overproduce and characterize membrane transporters. To illustrate our approach, we selected one member of the CorA transporter family among four tested that belonged to different species. This approach is transposable to other membrane proteins and involves the following steps: (i) cloning by homologous recombination, (ii) high-throughput expression screening, (iii) fermenter-based large-scale production, (iv) high-throughput detergent solubilization screening, (v) protein purification, (vi) multiangle static light scattering/refractometry characterization of purified proteins, (vii) circular dichroism spectroscopy, and (viii) detergent concentration measurements by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. Methanosarcina mazei CorA was expressed in milligram quantities and purified (> 95% pure). n-Dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM) retained the pentameric native structure of this transporter; thus, we selected it as working detergent. Furthermore, we measured the detergent concentration in our purified and concentrated protein sample by FT-IR to maintain it as low as possible. Our strategy can be adapted to many structural biology approaches as well as for study of single membrane proteins in a variety of conditions.     

A two‐component Kdo hydrolase in the inner membrane of Francisella novicida

Lipid A coats the outer surface of the outer membrane of Gram‐negative bacteria. In Francisella tularensis subspecies novicida lipid A is present either as the covalently attached anchor of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or as free lipid A. The lipid A moiety of Francisella LPS is linked to the core domain by a single 2‐keto‐3‐deoxy‐D‐manno‐octulosonic acid (Kdo) residue. F. novicida KdtA is bi‐functional, but F. novicida contains a membrane‐bound Kdo hydrolase that removes the outer Kdo unit. The hydrolase consists of two proteins (KdoH1 and KdoH2), which are expressed from adjacent, co‐transcribed genes. KdoH1 (related to sialidases) has a single predicted N‐terminal transmembrane segment. KdoH2 contains 7 putative transmembrane sequences. Neither protein alone catalyses Kdo cleavage when expressed in E. coli. Activity requires simultaneous expression of both proteins or mixing of membranes from strains expressing the individual proteins under in vitro assay conditions in the presence of non‐ionic detergent. In E. coli expressing KdoH1 and KdoH2, hydrolase activity is localized in the inner membrane. WBB06, a heptose‐deficient E. coli mutant that makes Kdo₂‐lipid A as its sole LPS, accumulates Kdo‐lipid A when expressing the both hydrolase components, and 1‐dephospho‐Kdo‐lipid A when expressing both the hydrolase and the Francisella lipid A 1‐phosphatase (LpxE).     

The immune evasion protein Sbi of Staphylococcus aureus occurs both extracellularly and anchored to the cell envelope by binding lipoteichoic acid

The Sbi protein of Staphylococcus aureus comprises two IgG‐binding domains similar to those of protein A and a region that triggers the activation of complement C3. Sbi is expressed on the cell surface but its C‐terminal domain lacks motifs associated with wall or membrane anchoring of proteins in Gram‐positive bacteria. Cell‐associated Sbi fractionates with the cytoplasmic membrane and is not solubilized during protoplast formation. S. aureus expressing Sbi truncates of the C‐terminal Y domain allowed identification of residues that are required for association of Sbi with the membrane. Recombinant Sbi bound to purified cytoplasmic membrane material in vitro and to purified lipoteichoic acid. This explains how Sbi partitions with the membrane in fractionation experiments yet is partially exposed on the cell surface. An LTA‐defective mutant of S. aureus had reduced levels of Sbi in the cytoplasmic membrane.     

Rational design of a fusion partner for membrane protein expression in E. coli

We have designed a novel protein fusion partner (P8CBD) to utilize the co‐translational SRP pathway in order to target heterologous proteins to the E. coli inner membrane. SRP‐dependence was demonstrated by analyzing the membrane translocation of P8CBD‐PhoA fusion proteins in wt and SRP‐ffh77 mutant cells. We also demonstrate that the P8CBD N‐terminal fusion partner promotes over‐expression of a Thermotoga maritima polytopic membrane protein by replacement of the native signal anchor sequence. Furthermore, the yeast mitochondrial inner membrane protein Oxa1p was expressed as a P8CBD fusion and shown to function within the E. coli inner membrane. In this example, the mitochondrial targeting peptide was replaced by P8CBD. Several practical features were incorporated into the P8CBD expression system to aid in protein detection, purification, and optional in vitro processing by enterokinase. The basis of membrane protein over‐expression toxicity is discussed and solutions to this problem are presented. We anticipate that this optimized expression system will aid in the isolation and study of various recombinant forms of membrane‐associated protein.     

High‐yield membrane protein expression from E. coli using an engineered outer membrane protein F fusion

Obtaining high yields of membrane proteins necessary to perform detailed structural study is difficult due to poor solubility and variability in yields from heterologous expression systems. To address this issue, an Escherichia coli‐based membrane protein overexpression system utilizing an engineered bacterial outer membrane protein F (pOmpF) fusion has been developed. Full‐length human receptor activity‐modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) was expressed using pOmpF, solubilized in FC15 and purified to homogeneity. Using circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy, purified full‐length RAMP1 is composed of approximately 90% α‐helix, and retains its solubility and structure in FC15 over a wide range of temperatures (20–60°C). Thus, our approach provides a useful, complementary approach to achieve high‐yield, full‐length membrane protein overexpression for biophysical studies.     

Characterization of protein detergent complexes by NMR, light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifugation

Abstract  Bottlenecks in expression, solubilization, purification and crystallization hamper the structural study of integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Successful crystallization is critically dependent on the purity, stability and oligomeric homogeneity of an IMP sample. These characteristics are in turn strongly influenced by the type and concentration of the detergents used in IMP preparation. By utilizing the techniques and analytical tools we earlier developed for the characterization of protein-detergent complexes (PDCs) [21], we demonstrate that for successful protein extraction from E. coli membrane fractions, the solubilizing detergent associates preferentially to IMPs rather than to membrane lipids. Notably, this result is contrary to the generally accepted mechanism of detergent-mediated IMP solubilization. We find that for one particular member of the family of proteins studied (E. coli receptor kinases, which is purified in mixed multimeric states and oligomerizes through its transmembrane region), the protein oligomeric composition is largely unaffected by a 10-fold increase in protein concentration, by alteration of micelle properties through addition of other detergents to the PDC sample, or by a 20-fold variation in the detergent concentration used for solubilization of the IMP from the membrane. We observed that the conditions used for expression of the IMP, which impact protein density in the membrane, has the greatest influence on the IMP oligomeric structure. Finally, we argue that for concentrating PDCs smaller than 30 kDa, stirred concentration cells are less prone to over-concentration of detergent and are therefore more effective than centrifugal ultrafiltration devices.     

Optimization of protein solubilization for the analysis of the CD14 human monocyte membrane proteome using LC-MS/MS

Proteomic profiling of membrane proteins is of vital importance in the search for disease biomarkers and drug development. However, the slow pace in this field has resulted mainly from the difficulty to analyze membrane proteins by mass spectrometry (MS). The objective of this investigation was to explore and optimize solubilization of membrane proteins for shotgun membrane proteomics of the CD14 human monocytes by examining different systems that rely on: i) an organic solvent (methanol) ii) an acid-labile detergent 3-[3-(1,1-bisalkyloxyethyl)pyridin-1-yl]propane-1-sulfonate (PPS), iii) a combination of both agents (methanol + PPS). Solubilization efficiency of different buffers was first compared using bacteriorhodopsin as a model membrane protein. Selected approaches were then applied on a membrane subproteome isolated from a highly enriched human monocyte population that was ~ 98% positive for CD14 expression as determined by FACS analysis. A methanol-based buffer yielded 194 proteins of which 93 (48%) were mapped as integral membrane proteins. The combination of methanol and acid-cleavable detergent gave similar results; 203 identified proteins of which 93 (46%) were mapped integral membrane proteins. However, employing PPS 216 proteins were identified of which 75 (35%) were mapped as integral membrane proteins. These results indicate that methanol alone or in combination with PPS yielded significantly higher membrane protein identification/enrichment than the PPS alone.     

Combinatorial Method for Overexpression of Membrane Proteins in Escherichia coli

Membrane proteins constitute 20–30% of all proteins encoded by the genome of various organisms. Large amounts of purified proteins are required for activity and crystallization attempts. Thus, there is an unmet need for a heterologous membrane protein overexpression system for purification, crystallization, and activity determination. We developed a combinatorial method for overexpressing and purifying membrane proteins using Escherichia coli. This method utilizes short hydrophilic bacterial proteins, YaiN and YbeL, fused to the ends of the membrane proteins to serve as facilitating factors for expression and purification. Fourteen prokaryotic and mammalian membrane proteins were expressed using this system. Moderate to high expression was obtained for most proteins, and detergent solubilization combined with a short purification process produced stable, monodispersed membrane proteins. Five of the mammalian membrane proteins, overexpressed using our system, were reconstituted into liposomes and exhibited transport activity comparable with the native transporters.