Integrins ��2��1 and ��11��1 regulate the survival of mesenchymal stem cells on collagen I

Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the natural source for bone regeneration, the exact mechanisms governing MSC crosstalk with collagen I have not yet been uncovered. Cell adhesion to collagen I is mostly mediated by three integrin receptors – α1β1, α2β1 and α11β1. Using human MSC (hMSC), we show that α11 subunit exhibited the highest basal expression levels but on osteogenic stimulation, both α2 and α11 integrins were significantly upregulated. To elucidate the possible roles of collagen-binding integrins, we applied short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown in hMSC and found that α2 or α11 deficiency, but not α1, results in a tremendous reduction of hMSC numbers owing to mitochondrial leakage accompanied by Bcl-2-associated X protein upregulation. In order to clarify the signaling conveyed by the collagen-binding integrins in hMSC, we analyzed the activation of focal adhesion kinase, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and serine/threonine protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) kinases and detected significantly reduced Akt phosphorylation only in α2- and α11-shRNA hMSC. Finally, experiments with hMSC from osteoporotic patients revealed a significant downregulation of α2 integrin concomitant with an augmented mitochondrial permeability. In conclusion, our study describes for the first time that disturbance of α2β1- or α11β1-mediated interactions to collagen I results in the cell death of MSCs and urges for further investigations examining the impact of MSCs in bone conditions with abnormal collagen I.     

Presynaptic Targeting of ��4��2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Is Regulated by Neurexin-1��

The mechanisms involved in the targeting of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), critical for their functional organization at neuronal synapses, are not well understood. We have identified a novel functional association between α4β2 AChRs and the presynaptic cell adhesion molecule, neurexin-1β. In non-neuronal tsA 201 cells, recombinant neurexin-1β and mature α4β2 AChRs form complexes. α4β2 AChRs and neurexin-1β also coimmunoprecipitate from rat brain lysates. When exogenous α4β2 AChRs and neurexin-1β are coexpressed in hippocampal neurons, they are robustly targeted to hemi-synapses formed between these neurons and cocultured tsA 201 cells expressing neuroligin-1, a postsynaptic binding partner of neurexin-1β. The extent of synaptic targeting is significantly reduced in similar experiments using a mutant neurexin-1β lacking the extracellular domain. Additionally, when α4β2 AChRs, α7 AChRs, and neurexin-1β are coexpressed in the same neuron, only the α4β2 AChR colocalizes with neurexin-1β at presynaptic terminals. Collectively, these data suggest that neurexin-1β targets α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic terminals, which mature by trans-synaptic interactions between neurexins and neuroligins. Interestingly, human neurexin-1 gene dysfunctions have been implicated in nicotine dependence and in autism spectrum disorders. Our results provide novel insights as to possible mechanisms by which dysfunctional neurexins, through downstream effects on α4β2 AChRs, may contribute to the etiology of these neurological disorders.The clustering of ion channels or receptors and precise targeting to pre- and postsynaptic specializations in neurons is critical to efficiently regulate synaptic transmission. Within the central nervous system, neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs)⁵ regulate the release of neurotransmitters at presynaptic sites (1) and mediate fast synaptic transmission at postsynaptic sites of neurons (2). These receptors are part of a family of acetylcholine-gated ion channels that are assembled from various combinations of α2–α10 and β2–β4 subunits (3). AChRs participate in the regulation of locomotion, affect, reward, analgesia, anxiety, learning, and attention (4, 5).The α4β2 subtype is the most abundant AChR receptor expressed in the brain. Multiple lines of evidence support a major role for α4β2 AChRs in nicotine addiction. α4β2 AChRs show high affinity for nicotine (6) and are located on the dopaminergic projections of ventral tegmental area neurons to the medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens (7, 8). Furthermore, β2 AChR subunit knock-out mice lose their sensitivity to nicotine in passive avoidance tasks (9) and show attenuated self-administration of nicotine (10). α4 AChR subunit knock-out mice also exhibit a loss of tonic control of striatal basal dopamine release (11). Finally, experiments with knock-in mice expressing α4β2 AChRs hypersensitive to nicotine demonstrate that α4β2 AChRs indeed mediate the essential features of nicotine addiction including reward, tolerance, and sensitization (12). High resolution ultrastructural studies show that α4 subunit-containing AChRs are clustered at dopaminergic axonal terminals (13), and a sequence motif has been identified within the α4 AChR subunit cytoplasmic domain that is essential for receptor trafficking to axons (14). However, the mechanisms underlying the targeting and clustering of α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic sites in neurons remain elusive.Recently, bi-directional interactions between neurexins and neuroligins have been shown to promote synapse assembly and maturation by fostering pre- and postsynaptic differentiation (reviewed in Refs. 15–17). The neurexins are encoded by three genes corresponding to neurexins I–III (18, 19), each encoding longer α-neurexins and shorter β-neurexins, because of differential promoter use. Neurexins recruit N- and P/Q-type calcium channels via scaffolding proteins, including calmodulin-associated serine/threonine kinase (20), to active zones of presynaptic terminals (21, 22). Recently, α-neurexins were shown to specifically induce GABAergic postsynaptic differentiation (23). Neuroligins, postsynaptic binding partners of neurexins, cluster N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and GABA_A receptors by recruiting the scaffolding proteins PSD-95 (post-synaptic density 95) and gephyrin, respectively (24, 25). Interestingly, neurexins and neuroligins also modulate the postsynaptic clustering of α3-containing AChRs in chick ciliary ganglia (26, 27). In this study, using multiple experimental strategies, we provide evidence for the formation of complexes between neurexin-1β and α4β2 AChRs and a role for neurexin in the targeting of α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic terminals of neurons.     

Molecular Cloning of Pigeon UDP-galactose:��-d-Galactoside ��1,4-Galactosyltransferase and UDP-galactose:��-d-Galactoside ��1,4-Galactosyltransferase, Two Novel Enzymes Catalyzing the Formation of Gal��1�C4Gal��1�C4Gal��1�C4GlcNAc Sequence

We previously found that pigeon IgG possesses unique N-glycan structures that contain the Galα1–4Galβ1–4Galβ1–4GlcNAc sequence at their nonreducing termini. This sequence is most likely produced by putative α1,4- and β1,4-galactosyltransferases (GalTs), which are responsible for the biosynthesis of the Galα1–4Gal and Galβ1–4Gal sequences on the N-glycans, respectively. Because no such glycan structures have been found in mammalian glycoproteins, the biosynthetic enzymes that produce these glycans are likely to have distinct substrate specificities from the known mammalian GalTs. To study these enzymes, we cloned the pigeon liver cDNAs encoding α4GalT and β4GalT by expression cloning and characterized these enzymes using the recombinant proteins. The deduced amino acid sequence of pigeon α4GalT has 58.2% identity to human α4GalT and 68.0 and 66.6% identity to putative α4GalTs from chicken and zebra finch, respectively. Unlike human and putative chicken α4GalTs, which possess globotriosylceramide synthase activity, pigeon α4GalT preferred to catalyze formation of the Galα1–4Gal sequence on glycoproteins. In contrast, the sequence of pigeon β4GalT revealed a type II transmembrane protein consisting of 438 amino acid residues, with no significant homology to the glycosyltransferases so far identified from mammals and chicken. However, hypothetical proteins from zebra finch (78.8% identity), frogs (58.9–60.4%), zebrafish (37.1–43.0%), and spotted green pufferfish (43.3%) were similar to pigeon β4GalT, suggesting that the pigeon β4GalT gene was inherited from the common ancestors of these vertebrates. The sequence analysis revealed that pigeon β4GalT and its homologs form a new family of glycosyltransferases.     

Targeting of Integrin ��1 and Kinesin 2�� by MicroRNA 183

MicroRNA 183 (miR-183) has been reported to inhibit tumor invasiveness and is believed to be involved in the development and function of ciliated neurosensory organs. We have recently found that expression of miR-183 increased after the induction of cellular senescence by exposure to H₂O₂. To gain insight into the biological roles of miR-183 we investigated two potential novel targets: integrin β1 (ITGB1) and kinesin 2α (KIF2A). miR-183 significantly decreased the expression of ITGB1 and KIF2A measured by Western blot. Targeting of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of ITGB1 and KIF2A by miR-183 was confirmed by luciferase assay. Transfection with miR-183 led to a significant decrease in cell invasion and migration capacities of HeLa cells that could be rescued by expression of ITGB1 lacking the 3′-UTR. Although miR-183 had no effects on cell adhesion in HeLa cells, it significantly decreased adhesion to laminin, gelatin, and collagen type I in normal human diploid fibroblasts and human trabecular meshwork cells. These effects were also rescued by expression of ITGB1 lacking the 3′-UTR. Targeting of KIF2A by miR-183 resulted in some increase in the formation of cells with monopolar spindles in HeLa cells but not in human diploid fibroblast or human trabecular meshwork cells. The regulation of ITGB1 expression by miR-183 provides a new mechanism for the anti-metastatic role of miR-183 and suggests that this miRNA could influence the development and function in neurosensory organs, and contribute to functional alterations associated with cellular senescence in human diploid fibroblasts and human trabecular meshwork cells.     

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Regulates Integrin ��v��3 Expression and Autocrine Transforming Growth Factor �� Signaling

Fibrosis is characterized by elevated transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling, resulting in extracellular matrix accumulation and increased PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor) expression. PAI-1 induces the internalization of urokinase plasminogen activator/receptor and integrin αvβ3 from the cell surface. Since increased αvβ3 expression correlates with increased TGFβ signaling, we hypothesized that aberrant PAI-1-mediated αvβ3 endocytosis could initiate an autocrine loop of TGFβ activity. We found that in PAI-1 knock-out (KO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts), αvβ3 endocytosis was reduced by ∼75%, leaving αvβ3 in enlarged focal adhesions, similar to wild type cells transfected with PAI-1 small interfering RNA. TGFβ signaling was significantly enhanced in PAI-1 KO cells, as demonstrated by a 3-fold increase in SMAD2/3-containing nuclei and a 2.9-fold increase in TGFβ activity that correlated with an increase in αvβ3 and TGFβ receptor II expression. As expected, PAI-1 KO cells had unregulated plasmin activity, which was only partially responsible for TGFβ activation, as evidenced by a mere 25% reduction in TGFβ activity when plasmin was inhibited. Treatment of cells with an αvβ3-specific cyclic RGD peptide (GpenGRGD) led to a more profound (59%) TGFβ inhibition; a nonspecific RGD peptide (GRGDNP) inhibited TGFβ by only 23%. Human primary fibroblasts were used to confirm that PAI-1 inhibition and β3 overexpression led to an increase in TGFβ activity. Consistent with a fibrotic phenotype, PAI-1 KO cells were constitutively myofibroblasts that had a 1.6-fold increase in collagen deposition over wild type cells. These data suggest that PAI-1-mediated regulation of αvβ3 integrin is critical for the control of TGFβ signaling and the prevention of fibrotic disease.Fibrotic disorders can result from environmental toxins, persistent infection, autoimmune disease, or mechanical injury, leading to the hardening and scarring of tissues. In fibrotic diseases, such as liver cirrhosis, renal fibrosis, and idiopathic lung fibrosis, or in pathological wound healing, such as hypertrophic scarring, scleroderma, and Dupuytren disease, the persistence of myofibroblasts contributes to disease progression by overproduction of extracellular matrix (ECM)² and by excessive contraction (1–3). A shift in the balance of growth factors and cytokines that promote ECM deposition and proteases that degrade matrix often contributes to fibrotic disease (4, 5). Plasmin, a broad spectrum protease that is generated from plasminogen by uPA, is one of the proteases that degrades matrix and activates growth factors and other proteases (6). Since uPA activity is inhibited by PAI-1, the overexpression of PAI-1 results in matrix accumulation. For this reason, PAI-1 is a key prognostic marker for fibrotic disease. PAI-1 exerts its inhibitory activity on uPA by stimulating the endocytosis of the cell surface uPA·uPAR complex through the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (7). Integrin αvβ3 is also internalized with the uPA·uPAR·low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein complex (8). After endocytosis, uPAR and integrins are recycled back to the cell surface for another round of binding (8, 9). uPAR and αvβ3 promote cellular attachment and spreading, since they are receptors for the extracellular matrix molecule, vitronectin (10). Thus, cycling of the complex is thought to stimulate the attachment and detachment that is necessary for cell migration (8). Consequently, a shift in the expression of any of these components (PAI-1/uPA/uPAR/αvβ3) can result in either aggressive migration, as seen in cancer invasion, or a persistent increase in cell adhesion and cell tension, as seen in myofibroblasts in fibrotic tissue.The family of TGFβ growth factors has been intensively studied for their role in fibrotic wound healing. Up-regulation of TGFβ results in amplified and persistent overproduction of molecules, such as integrins and PAI-1 and other protease inhibitors (e.g. TIMPs) (2, 3). Up-regulated integrins continue the cycle of TGFβ signaling by participating in the sustained activation of TGFβ from its latent form. To date, studies have found that various αv integrins participate in the activation of TGFβ (αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8), but the mechanism differs (11–15). Integrins can serve as docking proteins to localize proteases that cleave and activate latent TGFβ in the ECM, or they can directly activate latent TGFβ in a protease-independent manner. Recently, it was discovered that latent TGFβ is also activated by mechanical stress generated from an integrin-mediated interaction between myofibroblasts and the ECM, primarily involving αvβ5. The mechanical stress promotes a conformational change that activates the latent TGFβ complex (15). αv integrins also modulate TGFβ signaling through the binding of αvβ3 to TGFβ receptor II (TGFβRII) in the presence of TGFβ. This interaction was shown to promote a dramatic increase in the proliferation of lung fibroblasts and induce invasion of epithelial breast cancer cells (16, 17).Our data establish a role for the PAI-1-mediated control of αvβ3 expression and support a significant role for αvβ3 in TGFβ signaling. Using PAI-1 KO cells, we tested the hypothesis that the absence of PAI-1 would result in the accumulation of αvβ3 on the cell surface, since PAI-1 promotes the endocytosis of uPA·uPAR·αvβ3. PAI-1-mediated endocytosis of β3 was significantly reduced in the PAI-1 KO cells. Correspondingly, we report that β3 accumulated at the cell surface in enlarged β3-containing focal adhesions. Thus, we explored whether the accumulation of αvβ3 on the cell surface had fibrogenic effects even in the absence of profibrotic PAI-1. Our results demonstrate dramatically increased TGFβ activity and an increase in collagen expression in PAI-1 KO cells. Together, these findings suggest that PAI-1 modulates β3 expression and localization and, in turn, TGFβ signaling. Our data reveal that maintaining precise levels of PAI-1 is a key to preventing fibrosis. Understanding the consequence of regulating PAI-1 activity is critical in light of the many clinical therapies currently under development that target PAI-1 (18, 19).     

Membrane Partitioning: ��Classical�� and ��Nonclassical�� Hydrophobic Effects

The free energy of transfer of nonpolar solutes from water to lipid bilayers is often dominated by a large negative enthalpy rather than the large positive entropy expected from the hydrophobic effect. This common observation has led to the idea that membrane partitioning is driven by the "nonclassical" hydrophobic effect. We examined this phenomenon by characterizing the partitioning of the well-studied peptide melittin using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and circular dichroism (CD). We studied the temperature dependence of the entropic (-TΔS) and enthalpic (ΔH) components of free energy (ΔG) of partitioning of melittin into lipid membranes made of various mixtures of zwitterionic and anionic lipids. We found significant variations of the entropic and enthalpic components with temperature, lipid composition and vesicle size but only small changes in ΔG (entropy-enthalpy compensation). The heat capacity associated with partitioning had a large negative value of about -0.5 kcal mol(-1) K(-1). This hallmark of the hydrophobic effect was found to be independent of lipid composition. The measured heat capacity values were used to calculate the hydrophobic-effect free energy ΔG (hΦ), which we found to dominate melittin partitioning regardless of lipid composition. In the case of anionic membranes, additional free energy comes from coulombic attraction, which is characterized by a small effective peptide charge due to the lack of additivity of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in membrane interfaces [Ladokhin and White J Mol Biol 309:543-552, 2001]. Our results suggest that there is no need for a special effect-the nonclassical hydrophobic effect-to describe partitioning into lipid bilayers.     

Transforming Growth Factor-�� (TGF-��1) Activates TAK1 via TAB1-mediated Autophosphorylation, Independent of TGF-�� Receptor Kinase Activity in Mesangial Cells

Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is a multifunctional cytokine that signals through the interaction of type I (TβRI) and type II (TβRII) receptors to activate distinct intracellular pathways. TAK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that is rapidly activated by TGF-β1. However, the molecular mechanism of TAK1 activation is incompletely understood. Here, we propose a mechanism whereby TAK1 is activated by TGF-β1 in primary mouse mesangial cells. Under unstimulated conditions, endogenous TAK1 is stably associated with TβRI. TGF-β1 stimulation causes rapid dissociation from the receptor and induces TAK1 phosphorylation. Deletion mutant analysis indicates that the juxtamembrane region including the GS domain of TβRI is crucial for its interaction with TAK1. Both TβRI-mediated TAK1 phosphorylation and TGF-β1-induced TAK1 phosphorylation do not require kinase activity of TβRI. Moreover, TβRI-mediated TAK1 phosphorylation correlates with the degree of its association with TβRI and requires kinase activity of TAK1. TAB1 does not interact with TGF-β receptors, but TAB1 is indispensable for TGF-β1-induced TAK1 activation. We also show that TRAF6 and TAB2 are required for the interaction of TAK1 with TβRI and TGF-β1-induced TAK1 activation in mouse mesangial cells. Taken together, our data indicate that TGF-β1-induced interaction of TβRI and TβRII triggers dissociation of TAK1 from TβRI, and subsequently TAK1 is phosphorylated through TAB1-mediated autophosphorylation and not by the receptor kinase activity of TβRI.Members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)³ superfamily are key regulators of various biological processes such as cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and wound healing (1, 2). TGF-β1, the prototype of TGF-β family, is a potent inducer of extracellular matrix synthesis and is well established as a central mediator in the final common pathway of fibrosis associated with progressive kidney diseases (3, 4). Upon ligand stimulation, TGF-β type I (TβRI) and type II (TβRII) receptors form heterotetrameric complexes, by which TβRI is phosphorylated in the GS domain and activated. Smad signaling pathway is well established as a canonical pathway induced by TGF-β1 (5, 6). Receptor-regulated Smads (Smad2 and Smad3) are recruited and activated by the activated TβRI. The phosphorylation in the GS domain (7) and L45 loop (8) of TβRI are crucial for its interaction with receptor-regulated Smads. After phosphorylation, receptor-regulated Smads are rapidly dissociated from TβRI and interact with common Smad (Smad4) followed by nuclear translocation. In addition to the Smad pathway, a recently emerging body of evidence has demonstrated that TGF-β1 also induces various Smad-independent signaling pathways (9–17) by which mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (18, 19), p38 MAPK (20–22), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (23, 24) can be activated by TGF-β1.TAK1, initially identified as a MAPK kinase kinase 7 (MKKK7 or MAP3K7) in the TGF-β signaling pathway (11, 12), also can be activated by environmental stress (25), proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α (26, 27) and lipopolysaccharide (28). For TAK1 activation, phosphorylation at Thr-187 and Ser-192 in the activation loop of TAK1 is essentially required (29–31). TAK1 can transduce signals to several downstream signaling cascades, including the MAPK kinase (MKK) 4/7-JNK cascade, MKK3/6-p38 MAPK cascade, and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)-inducing kinase-IκB kinase cascade (26–28). A recent report has shown that TAK1 is also activated by agonists of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and ischemia, which in turn activates the LKB1/AMPK pathway, a pivotal energy-sensor pathway (32). TAK1 is also involved in Wnt signaling (33). We and others have previously demonstrated that TAK1 is a major mediator of TGF-β1-induced type I collagen and fibronectin expression through activation of the MKK3-p38 MAPK and MKK4-JNK signaling cascades, respectively (34–37). Furthermore, increased expression and activation of TAK1 enhance p38 phosphorylation and promote interstitial fibrosis in the myocardium from 9-day-old TAK1 transgenic mice (37). These data implicate a crucial role of TAK1 in extracellular matrix production and tissue fibrosis. TAK1 is also implicated in regulation of cell cycle (38), cell apoptosis (39–41), and the Smad signaling pathway (42–44). Thus, TAK1 may function as an important regulator and mediator of TGF-β1-induced Smad-dependent and Smad-independent signaling pathways.It has been demonstrated that TAK1 can be activated by the interaction with TAK1-binding protein 1 (TAB1) by in vitro binding assays and in overexpression studies (29–31); however, it is not clear whether TAB1 plays a crucial role in ligand-induced TAK1 activation. In embryonic fibroblasts from TAB1 null mice, IL-1 and TNF-α could induce TAK1-mediated NF-κB and JNK activation (45). TAK1 activation induced by TNF-α, IL-1, and T-cell receptor requires TAB2 or its homologous protein TAB3 (46–50). Although many questions still remain, much progress has been made in understanding the activation mechanism of TAK1 by inflammatory cytokines (46, 47, 51–53). Ligand binding of IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) results in recruitment of MyD88, which serves as an adaptor for IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) 1 and 4. Subsequently IRAK1 is hyperphosphorylated and induces interaction with TNF-α receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), resulting in TRAF6 oligomerization. After oligomerization of TRAF6, IRAK1-TRAF6 complex is dissociated from the receptor and associated with TAK1, which is mediated by TAB2 (or TAB3). In this process polyubiquitination of TRAF6 by Ubc13/Uev1A is thought to be critical for the association with TAB2 (or TAB3), which links TAK1 activation (46, 54, 55). In the case of TNF-α stimulation, TNF-α receptors form trimers and recruit adaptor proteins, TRAF2/5, and receptor-interacting protein 1 on the membrane. Ubc13/Uev1A- and TRAF2-dependent polyubiquitination of receptor-interacting protein 1 induce association of TAB2 (or TAB3), which then activates TAK1. Thus, TAB2 is required for ubiquitin-dependent activation of TAK1 by TRAFs. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 plays a role as an upstream mediator of TGF-β-induced TAK1 activation, which in turn activates the MKK4-JNK signaling cascade in 293T cells (56, 57). Besides hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1, it has been also suggested that X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) might link TAK1 to TGF-β/BMP receptors through the capability of XIAP to interact with TGF-β/BMP receptors and TAB1 (58). Thus, although various molecules participate in the activation of TAK1, the precise mechanism by which TGF-β1 induces TAK1 activation is incompletely understood. Here, we provide evidence that the association of TAK1 with TGF-β receptors is important for TGF-β1-induced activation of TAK1 in mouse mesangial cells. TGF-β1 stimulation induces interaction of TβRI and TβRII, triggering dissociation of TAK1 from TβRI, and subsequently TAK1 is phosphorylated through TAB1-mediated autophosphorylation, independent of receptor kinase activity of TβRI.     

Characterization of Three ��-Galactoside Phosphorylases from Clostridium phytofermentans: DISCOVERY OF d-GALACTOSYL-��1��4-l-RHAMNOSE PHOSPHORYLASE*

We characterized three d-galactosyl-β1→3-N-acetyl-d-hexosamine phosphorylase (EC 2.4.1.211) homologs from Clostridium phytofermentans (Cphy0577, Cphy1920, and Cphy3030 proteins). Cphy0577 and Cphy3030 proteins exhibited similar activity on galacto-N-biose (GNB; d-Gal-β1→3-d-GalNAc) and lacto-N-biose I (LNB; d-Gal-β1→3-d-GlcNAc), thus indicating that they are d-galactosyl-β1→3-N-acetyl-d-hexosamine phosphorylases, subclassified as GNB/LNB phosphorylase. In contrast, Cphy1920 protein phosphorolyzed neither GNB nor LNB. It showed the highest activity with l-rhamnose as the acceptor in the reverse reaction using α-d-galactose 1-phosphate as the donor. The reaction product was d-galactosyl-β1→4-l-rhamnose. The enzyme also showed activity on l-mannose, l-lyxose, d-glucose, 2-deoxy-d-glucose, and d-galactose in this order. When d-glucose derivatives were used as acceptors, reaction products were β-1,3-galactosides. Kinetic parameters of phosphorolytic activity on d-galactosyl-β1→4-l-rhamnose were k_cat = 45 s⁻¹ and K_m = 7.9 mm, thus indicating that these values are common among other phosphorylases. We propose d-galactosyl-β1→4-l-rhamnose phosphorylase as the name for Cphy1920 protein.Phosphorylases are a group of enzymes involved in formation and cleavage of glycoside linkage together with glycoside hydrolases and glycosyl-nucleotide glycosyltransferases (synthases). Phosphorylases, which reversibly phosphorolyze oligosaccharides to produce monosaccharide 1-phosphate, are generally intracellular enzymes showing strict substrate specificity. Physiologically, such strict substrate specificity is considered to be closely related to the environment containing bacteria possessing them. For example, d-galactosyl-β1→3-N-acetyl-d-hexosamine phosphorylase (GalHexNAcP²; EC 2.4.1.211) from Bifidobacterium longum, an intestinal bacterium, forms part of the pathway metabolizing galacto-N-biose (GNB; d-Gal-β1→3-d-GalNAc) from mucin and lacto-N-biose I (LNB; d-Gal-β1→3-d-GlcNAc) from human milk oligosaccharides, both of which are present in the intestinal environment, with GNB- and LNB-releasing enzymes and GNB/LNB transporter (1–8). Another example is cellobiose phosphorylase from Cellvibrio gilvus, which is a cellulolytic bacterium. Cellobiose phosphorylase forms an important cellulose metabolic pathway with an extracellular cellulase system producing cellobiose (9, 10).The reversible catalytic reaction of phosphorylases is one of the most remarkable features that make them suitable catalysts for practical syntheses of oligosaccharides. An oligosaccharide can be produced from inexpensive material by combining reactions of two phosphorylases, one for phosphorolyzing the material and the other for synthesizing the oligosaccharide, in one pot. Based on this idea, LNB is synthesized on a large (kg) scale using sucrose phosphorylase and GalHexNAcP (11). Practical synthesis methods of trehalose and cellobiose have also been developed (12, 13). However, only 14 kinds of substrate specificities have been reported among phosphorylases (13), thus restricting their use. Therefore, it would be useful to find a phosphorylase with novel activity.GalHexNAcP phosphorolyzes GNB and LNB to produce α-d-galactose 1-phosphate (Gal 1-P) and the corresponding N-acetyl-d-hexosamine. To date, GalHexNAcP is the only phosphorylase known to act on β-galactoside. This enzyme was first found in the cell-free extract of Bifidobacterium bifidum (14) and then in B. longum (1, 15), Clostridium perfringens (16), Propionibacterium acnes (17), and Vibrio vulnificus (18). These studies revealed that GalHexNAcPs were classified into three subgroups based on substrate preference between GNB and LNB. These subgroups are as follows: 1) galacto-N-biose/lacto-N-biose I phosphorylase (GLNBP), showing similar activity on both GNB and LNB (B. longum and B. bifidum); 2) galacto-N-biose phosphorylase (GNBP), preferring GNB to LNB (C. perfringens and P. acnes); and 3) lacto-N-biose I phosphorylase (LNBP), preferring LNB to GNB (V. vulnificus) (18). The ternary structure of GLNBP from B. longum (GLNBP_Bl) has been revealed recently (19). Based on the similarity in ternary structures between GLNBP_Bl and β-galactosidase from Thermus thermophilus, which belongs to glycoside hydrolase family 42 (19, 20), GalHexNAcP homologs are classified as GH112 (glycoside hydrolase family 112), although phosphorylases are glycosyltransferases (21, 22).Clostridium phytofermentans is an anaerobic cellulolytic bacterium. It is found in soil and grows optimally at 37 °C (23). Its whole genome sequence has been revealed (GenBank^TM accession number {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CP000885","term_id":"160426828","term_text":"CP000885"}}CP000885). The bacterium possesses three GalHexNAcP homologous genes (cphy0577, cphy1920, and cphy3030 genes; GenBank^TM accession numbers are {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABX40964.1","term_id":"160427401","term_text":"ABX40964.1"}}ABX40964.1, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABX42289.1","term_id":"160428726","term_text":"ABX42289.1"}}ABX42289.1, and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABX43387.1","term_id":"160429824","term_text":"ABX43387.1"}}ABX43387.1, respectively). C. phytofermentans has the ability to utilize a wide range of plant polysaccharides (23), and substrate specificities of these three gene products (Cphy0577, Cphy1920, and Cphy3030 proteins) are considered to be responsible for this ability. Furthermore, the three proteins have not been clearly categorized as GLNBP, GNBP, or LNBP, based on the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 1.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Phylogenetic tree of GalHexNAcP homologs in GH112. Multiple alignment was performed using ClustalW2 (available on the World Wide Web). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using Treeview version 1.6.6. The proteins characterized in this study are represented with boldface letters in boxes with a heavy outline. The other proteins are numbered serially in boxes. Characterized GLNBP, GNBP, and LNBP are represented with boldface black letters on a gray background, boldface white letters on a gray background, and boldface white letters on a black background, respectively. Organisms and GenBank^TM accession numbers of numbered proteins are as follows: 1, CPF0553 (C. perfringens ATCC13124, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABG83511.1","term_id":"110674524","term_text":"ABG83511.1"}}ABG83511.1) (16); 2, CPE0573 (C. perfringens str.13, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"BAB80279.1","term_id":"18144232","term_text":"BAB80279.1"}}BAB80279.1); 3, CPR0537 (C. perfringens SM101, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABG86710.1","term_id":"110683340","term_text":"ABG86710.1"}}ABG86710.1); 4, LnpA2 (B. bifidum JCM1254, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"BAE95374.1","term_id":"107597820","term_text":"BAE95374.1"}}BAE95374.1) (14, 15); 5, LnpA1 (B. bifidum JCM1254, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"BAD80752.1","term_id":"56676017","term_text":"BAD80752.1"}}BAD80752.1) (14, 15); 6, GLNBP_Bl (B. longum subsp. longum JCM 1217, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"BAD80751.1","term_id":"56676015","term_text":"BAD80751.1"}}BAD80751.1) (1, 16); 7, Blon_2174 (B. longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACJ53235.1","term_id":"213524488","term_text":"ACJ53235.1"}}ACJ53235.1); 8, BL1641 (B. longum NCC2705, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAN25428.1","term_id":"23326930","term_text":"AAN25428.1"}}AAN25428.1); 9, BLD_1765 (B. longum DJO10A, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACD99210.1","term_id":"189429062","term_text":"ACD99210.1"}}ACD99210.1); 10, GnpA (P. acnes JCM6473, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AB468065","term_id":"219807264","term_text":"AB468065"}}AB468065) (17); 11, GnpA (P. acnes JCM6425, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AB468066","term_id":"219807262","term_text":"AB468066"}}AB468066) (17); 12, PPA0083 (P. acnes KPA171202, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAT81843.1","term_id":"50839176","term_text":"AAT81843.1"}}AAT81843.1); 13, VV2_1091 (V. vulnificus CMCP6, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAO07997.1","term_id":"27359049","term_text":"AAO07997.1"}}AAO07997.1) (18); 14, VVA1614 (V. vulnificus YJ016, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"BAC97640.1","term_id":"37201820","term_text":"BAC97640.1"}}BAC97640.1); 15, Oter_1377 (Opitutus terrae PB90-1, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACB74662.1","term_id":"177840410","term_text":"ACB74662.1"}}ACB74662.1); 16, BCQ_1989 (B. cereus Q1, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACM12417.1","term_id":"221239707","term_text":"ACM12417.1"}}ACM12417.1); 17, BCAH187_A2105 (Bacillus cereus AH187, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACJ78918.1","term_id":"217064668","term_text":"ACJ78918.1"}}ACJ78918.1).In this study, we characterized the three proteins. We reported that two of them were GalHexNAcPs and that the other was a β-galactoside phosphorylase showing unique substrate specificity.     

Plumieribetin, a Fish Lectin Homologous to Mannose-binding B-type Lectins, Inhibits the Collagen-binding ��1��1 Integrin

Recently, a few fish proteins have been described with a high homology to B-type lectins of monocotyledonous plants. Because of their mannose binding activity, they have been ascribed a role in innate immunity. By screening various fish venoms for their integrin inhibitory activity, we isolated a homologous protein from the fin stings and skin mucus of the scorpionfish (Scorpaena plumieri). This protein inhibits α1β1 integrin binding to basement membrane collagen IV. By protein chemical and spectroscopic means, we demonstrated that this fish protein, called plumieribetin, is a homotetramer and contains a high content of anti-parallel β strands, similar to the mannose-binding monocot B-lectins. It lacks both N-linked glycoconjugates and common O-glycan motifs. Despite its B-lectin-like structure, plumieribetin binds to α1β1 integrin irrespective of N-glycosylation, suggesting a direct protein-protein interaction. This interaction is independent of divalent cations. On the cellular level, plumieribetin failed to completely detach hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells and primary arterial smooth muscle cells from the collagen IV fragment CB3. However, plumieribetin weakened the cell-collagen contacts, reduced cell spreading, and altered the actin cytoskeleton, after the compensating α2β1 integrin was blocked. The integrin inhibiting effect of plumieribetin adds a new function to the B-lectin family, which is known for pathogen defense.     

Loss of Function of ATXN1 Increases Amyloid ��-Protein Levels by Potentiating ��-Secretase Processing of ��-Amyloid Precursor Protein

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease with complex and strong genetic inheritance. Four genes have been established to either cause familial early onset AD (APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2) or to increase susceptibility for late onset AD (APOE). To date ∼80% of the late onset AD genetic variance remains elusive. Recently our genome-wide association screen identified four novel late onset AD candidate genes. Ataxin 1 (ATXN1) is one of these four AD candidate genes and has been indicated to be the disease gene for spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, which is also a neurodegenerative disease. Mounting evidence suggests that the excessive accumulation of Aβ, the proteolytic product of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP), is the primary AD pathological event. In this study, we ask whether ATXN1 may lead to AD pathogenesis by affecting Aβ and APP processing utilizing RNA interference in a human neuronal cell model and mouse primary cortical neurons. We show that knock-down of ATXN1 significantly increases the levels of both Aβ40 and Aβ42. This effect could be rescued with concurrent overexpression of ATXN1. Moreover, overexpression of ATXN1 decreased Aβ levels. Regarding the underlying molecular mechanism, we show that the effect of ATXN1 expression on Aβ levels is modulated via β-secretase cleavage of APP. Taken together, ATXN1 functions as a genetic risk modifier that contributes to AD pathogenesis through a loss-of-function mechanism by regulating β-secretase cleavage of APP and Aβ levels.     

Suboptimal Activation of Protease-activated Receptors Enhances ��2��1 Integrin-mediated Platelet Adhesion to Collagen

Thrombin and fibrillar collagen are potent activators of platelets at sites of vascular injury. Both agonists cause platelet shape change, granule secretion, and aggregation to form the primary hemostatic plug. Human platelets express two thrombin receptors, protease-activated receptors 1 and 4 (PAR1 and PAR4) and two collagen receptors, the α₂β₁ integrin (α₂β₁) and the glycoprotein VI (GPVI)/FcRγ chain complex. Although these receptors and their signaling mechanisms have been intensely studied, it is not known whether and how these receptors cooperate in the hemostatic function of platelets. This study examined cooperation between the thrombin and collagen receptors in platelet adhesion by utilizing a collagen-related peptide (α2-CRP) containing the α₂β₁-specific binding motif, GFOGER, in conjunction with PAR-activating peptides. We demonstrate that platelet adhesion to α2-CRP is substantially enhanced by suboptimal PAR activation (agonist concentrations that do not stimulate platelet aggregation) using the PAR4 agonist peptide and thrombin. The enhanced adhesion induced by suboptimal PAR4 activation was α₂β₁-dependent and GPVI/FcRγ-independent as revealed in experiments with α₂β₁- or FcRγ-deficient mouse platelets. We further show that suboptimal activation of other platelet G_q-linked G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) produces enhanced platelet adhesion to α2-CRP. The enhanced α₂β₁-mediated platelet adhesion is controlled by phospholipase C (PLC), but is not dependent on granule secretion, activation of α_IIbβ₃ integrin, or on phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) activity. In conclusion, we demonstrate a platelet priming mechanism initiated by suboptimal activation of PAR4 or other platelet G_q-linked GPCRs through a PLC-dependent signaling cascade that promotes enhanced α₂β₁ binding to collagens containing GFOGER sites.     

Molecular Basis of the Recognition of Nephronectin by Integrin ��8��1

Integrin α8β1 interacts with a variety of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-containing ligands in the extracellular matrix. Here, we examined the binding activities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing ligands. Integrin α8β1 bound specifically to nephronectin with an apparent dissociation constant of 0.28 ± 0.01 nm, but showed only marginal affinities for fibronectin and other RGD-containing ligands. The high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin was fully reproduced with a recombinant nephronectin fragment derived from the RGD-containing central “linker” segment. A series of deletion mutants of the recombinant fragment identified the LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of the RGD motif as an auxiliary site required for high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin. Alanine scanning mutagenesis within the LFEIFEIER sequence defined the EIE sequence as a critical motif ensuring the high-affinity integrin-ligand interaction. Although a synthetic LFEIFEIER peptide failed to inhibit the binding of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin, a longer peptide containing both the RGD motif and the LFEIFEIER sequence was strongly inhibitory, and was ∼2,000-fold more potent than a peptide containing only the RGD motif. Furthermore, trans-complementation assays using recombinant fragments containing either the RGD motif or LFEIFEIER sequence revealed a clear synergism in the binding to α8β1 integrin. Taken together, these results indicate that the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin is achieved by bipartite interaction of the integrin with the RGD motif and LFEIFEIER sequence, with the latter serving as a synergy site that greatly potentiates the RGD-driven integrin-ligand interaction but has only marginal activity to secure the interaction by itself.Integrins are a family of adhesion receptors that interact with a variety of extracellular ligands, typically cell-adhesive proteins in the extracellular matrix (ECM).² They play mandatory roles in embryonic development and the maintenance of tissue architectures by providing essential links between cells and the ECM (1). Integrins are composed of two non-covalently associated subunits, termed α and β. In mammals, 18 α and 8 β subunits have been identified, and combinations of these subunits give rise to at least 24 distinct integrin heterodimers. Based on their ligand-binding specificities, ECM-binding integrins are classified into three groups, namely laminin-, collagen- and RGD-binding integrins (2, 3), of which the RGD-binding integrins have been most extensively investigated. The RGD-binding integrins include α5β1, α8β1, αIIbβ3, and αV-containing integrins, and have been shown to interact with a variety of ECM ligands, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, with distinct binding specificities.The α8 integrin subunit was originally identified in chick nerves (4). Integrin α8β1 is expressed in the metanephric mesenchyme and plays a crucial role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during the early stages of kidney morphogenesis. Disruption of the α8 gene in mice was found to be associated with severe defects in kidney morphogenesis (5) and stereocilia development (6). To date, α8β1 integrin has been shown to bind to fibronectin, vitronectin, osteopontin, latency-associated peptide of transforming growth factor-β1, tenascin-W, and nephronectin (also named POEM) (7–13), among which nephronectin is believed to be an α8β1 integrin ligand involved in kidney development (10).Nephronectin is one of the basement membrane proteins whose expression and localization patterns are restricted in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner (10, 11). Nephronectin consists of five epidermal growth factor-like repeats, a linker segment containing the RGD cell-adhesive motif (designated RGD-linker) and a meprin-A5 protein-receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase μ (MAM) domain (see Fig. 3A). Although the physiological functions of nephronectin remain only poorly understood, it is thought to play a role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions through binding to α8β1 integrin, thereby transmitting signals from the epithelium to the mesenchyme across the basement membrane (10). Recently, mice deficient in nephronectin expression were produced by homologous recombination (14). These nephronectin-deficient mice frequently displayed kidney agenesis, a phenotype reminiscent of α8 integrin knock-out mice (14), despite the fact that other RGD-containing ligands, including fibronectin and osteopontin, were expressed in the embryonic kidneys (9, 15). The failure of the other RGD-containing ligands to compensate for the deficiency of nephronectin in the developing kidneys suggests that nephronectin is an indispensable α8β1 ligand that plays a mandatory role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during kidney development.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 3.Binding activities of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin and its fragments. A, schematic diagrams of full-length nephronectin (NN) and its fragments. RGD-linker and RGD-linker (GST), the central RGD-containing linker segments expressed in mammalian and bacterial expression systems, respectively; PRGDV, a short RGD-containing peptide modeled after nephronectin and expressed as a GST fusion protein (see Fig. 4A for the peptide sequence). The arrowheads indicate the positions of the RGD motif. B, purified recombinant proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 7–15% gradient (left and center panels) and 12% (right panels) gels, followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining, immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG mAb, or lectin blotting with PNA. The quantities of proteins loaded were: 0.5 μg (for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining) and 0.1 μg (for blotting with anti-FLAG and PNA) in the left and center panels;1 μg in the right panel. C, recombinant proteins (10 nm) were coated on microtiter plates and assessed for their binding activities toward α8β1 integrin (10 nm) in the presence of 1 mm Mn²⁺. The backgrounds were subtracted as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The results represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations. D, titration curves of α8β1 integrin bound to full-length nephronectin (NN, closed squares), the RGD-linker segments expressed in 293F cells (RGD-linker, closed triangles) and E. coli (RGD-linker (GST), open triangles), the MAM domain (MAM, closed diamonds), and the PRGDV peptide expressed as a GST fusion protein in E. coli (PRGDV (GST), open circles). The assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2B. The results represent the means of duplicate determinations.Although ligand recognition by RGD-binding integrins is primarily determined by the RGD motif in the ligands, it is the residues outside the RGD motif that define the binding specificities and affinities toward individual integrins (16, 17). For example, α5β1 integrin specifically binds to fibronectin among the many RGD-containing ligands, and requires not only the RGD motif in the 10th type III repeat but also the so-called “synergy site” within the preceding 9th type III repeat for fibronectin recognition (18). Recently, DiCara et al. (19) demonstrated that the high-affinity binding of αVβ6 integrin to its natural ligands, e.g. foot-and-mouth disease virus, requires the RGD motif immediately followed by a Leu-Xaa-Xaa-Leu/Ile sequence, which forms a helix to align the two conserved hydrophobic residues along the length of the helix. Given the presence of many naturally occurring RGD-containing ligands, it is conceivable that the specificities of the RGD-binding integrins are dictated by the sequences flanking the RGD motif or those in neighboring domains that come into close proximity with the RGD motif in the intact ligand proteins. However, the preferences of α8β1 integrin for RGD-containing ligands and how it secures its high-affinity binding toward its preferred ligands remain unknown.In the present study, we investigated the binding specificities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing cell-adhesive proteins. Our data reveal that nephronectin is a preferred ligand for α8β1 integrin, and that a LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of its RGD motif serves as a synergy site to ensure the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin.