Binding of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain to the estrogen response element induces DNA bending.

We have used circular permutation analysis to determine whether binding of purified Xenopus laevis estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (DBD) to a DNA fragment containing an estrogen response element (ERE) causes the DNA to bend. Gel mobility shift assays showed that DBD-DNA complexes formed with fragments containing more centrally located EREs migrated more slowly than complexes formed with fragments containing EREs near the ends of the DNA. DNA bending standards were used to determine that the degree of bending induced by binding of the DBD to an ERE was approximately 34 degrees. A 1.55-fold increase in the degree of bending was observed when two EREs were present in the DNA fragment. These in vitro studies suggest that interaction of nuclear receptors with their hormone response elements in vivo may result in an altered DNA conformation.     

Stability of the ligand-estrogen receptor interaction depends on estrogen response element flanking sequences and cellular factors

To determine whether accessory proteins mediate the ligand- and DNA sequence-dependent specificity of estrogen receptor (ER) interaction with DNA, the binding of partly purified vs highly purified bovine ER to various estrogen response elements (EREs) was measured in the presence of different ER ligands. Partly purified estradiol-liganded ER (E₂-ER) binds cooperatively to stereoaligned tandem EREs flanked by naturally occurring AT-rich sequences, with a stoichiometry of one E₂-ER dimer per ERE. In contrast, highly purified E₂-ER binds with a 10-fold lower affinity and non-cooperatively to EREs flanked by the AT-rich region. Moreover, the binding stoichiometry of highly purified E₂-ER was 0.5 E₂-ER dimer, or one monomer per ERE, independent of the ERE flanking sequence. Interestingly, the binding of ER liganded with the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT-ER) was non-cooperative with an apparent stoichiometry of 0.5 4-OHT-ER dimer per ERE, regardless of ER purity or ERE flanking sequence. We recently showed that when 4-OHT-ER binds DNA, one molecule of 4-OHT dissociates from the dimeric 4-OHT-ER-ERE complex, accounting for the reduced apparent binding stoichiometry. In contrast, ER covalently bound by tamoxifen aziridine (TAz) gave an ERE binding stoichiometry of one TAz-ER dimer per ERE, and TAz-ER binds cooperatively to multiple AT-rich EREs, regardless of the purity of the receptor. We have obtained evidence that purification of ER removes an accessory protein(s) that interacts with ER in a sequence- and/or DNA conformational-dependent manner, resulting in stabilization of E₂, but not 4-OHT, in the ligand binding domain when the receptor binds to DNA. We postulate that retention of ligand by ER maintains the receptor in a conformation necessary to achieve high-affinity, cooperative ERE binding.     

Molecular Dynamics Simulation in Solvent of the Estrogen Receptor Protein DNA Binding Domain in Complex with a Non-Consensus Estrogen Response Element DNA Sequence

Abstract

We investigated protein/DNA interactions, using molecular dynamics simulations computed between a 10 Angstom water layer model of the estrogen receptor (ER) protein DNA binding domain (DBD) amino acids and DNA of a non-consensus estrogen response element (ERE) consisting of 29 nucleotide base pairs. This ERE nucleotide sequence occurs naturally upstream of the Xenopus laevis Vitelligenin AI gene. The ER DBD is encoded by three exons. Namely, exons 2 and 3 which encode the two zinc binding motifs and a sequence of exon 4 which encodes a predicted alpha helix. We generated a computer model of the ER DBD using atomic coordinates derived from the average of 30 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy coordinate sets. Amino acids on the carboxyl end of the ER DBD were disordered in both X-ray crystallography and NMR determinations and no coordinates were reported. This disordered region includes 10 amino acids of a predicted alpha helix encoded in exon 4 at the exon 3/4 splice junction. These amino acids are known to be important in DNA binding and are also believed to function as a nuclear translocation signal sequence for the ER protein. We generated a computer model of the predicted alpha helix consisting of the 10 amino acids encoded in exon 4 and attached this helix to the carboxyl end of the ER DBD at the exon 3/4 splice junction site. We docked the ER DBD model within the DNA major groove halfsites of the 29 base pair non-consensus ERE and flanking nucleotides. We constructed a solvated model with the ER DBD/ERE complex surrounded by a ten Angstrom water layer and conducted molecular dynamics simulations. Hydrogen bonding interactions were monitored. In addition, van der Waals and electrostatic interaction energies were calculated. Amino acids of the ER DBD DNA recognition helix formed both direct and water mediated hydrogen bonds at cognate codon-anticodon nucleotide base and backbone sites within the ERE DNA right major groove halfsite. Amino acids of the ER DBD exon 4 encoded predicted alpha helix formed direct and water mediated H-bonds with base and backbone sites of their cognate codon-anticodon nucleotides within the minor grooves flanking the ERE DNA major groove halfsites. These interactions together induced bending of the DNA into the protein.     

Binding of type II nuclear receptors and estrogen receptor to full and half-site estrogen response elements in vitro.

The mechanism by which retinoids, thyroid hormone (T3) and estrogens modulate the growth of breast cancer cells is unclear. Since nuclear type II nuclear receptors, including retinoic acid receptor (RAR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) and thyroid hormone receptor (TR), bind direct repeats (DR) of the estrogen response elements (ERE) half-site (5'-AGGTCA-3'), we examined the ability of estrogen receptor (ER) versus type II nuclear receptors, i.e. RARalpha, beta and gamma, RXRbeta, TRalpha and TRbeta, to bind various EREs in vitro . ER bound a consensus ERE, containing a perfectly palindromic 17 bp inverted repeat (IR), as a homodimer. In contrast, ER did not bind to a single ERE half-site. Likewise, ER did not bind two tandem (38 bp apart) half-sites, but low ER binding was detected to three tandem copies of the same half-site. RARalpha,beta or gamma bound both ERE and half-site constructs as a homodimer. RXRbeta did not bind full or half-site EREs, nor did RXRbeta enhance RARalpha binding to a full ERE. However, RARalpha and RXRbeta bound a half-site ERE cooperatively forming a dimeric complex. The RARalpha-RXRbeta heterodimer bound the Xenopus vitellogenin B1 estrogen responsive unit, with two non-consensus EREs, with higher affinity than one or two copies of the full or half-site ERE. Both TRalpha and TRbeta bound the full and the half-site ERE as monomers and homodimers and cooperatively as heterodimers with RXRbeta. We suggest that the cellular concentrations of nuclear receptors and their ligands, and the nature of the ERE or half-site sequence and those of its flanking sequences determine the occupation of EREs in estrogen-regulated genes in vivo .     

An explanation for observed estrogen receptor binding to single-stranded estrogen-responsive element DNA.

Estrogen-inducible genes contain an enhancer called the estrogen response element (ERE), a double-stranded inverted repeat. The estrogen receptor (ER) is generally thought to bind to the double-stranded ERE. However, some reports provide evidence that an ER homodimer can bind a single strand of the ERE and suggest that single-stranded ERE binding is the preferred binding mode for ER. Since these two models describe quite different mechanisms of receptor action, we have attempted to reconcile the observations. Analyzing DNA structure by nuclease sensitivity, we found that two identical molecules of a single strand of DNA containing the ERE sequence can partially anneal in an antiparallel manner. Bimolecular annealing produces double-stranded inverted repeats, with adjacent unannealed tails. The amount of annealing correlates exactly with the ability of ER to bind bimolecular EREs. Either strand of an ERE could anneal to itself in a way that would bind ER. We conclude that ER binds only the annealed double-stranded ERE both in vitro and in vivo.     

The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer

Extracts containing wild-type or mutant human estrogen receptor (ER) have been used to study the binding of ER to its responsive element (ERE). Estradiol (E2) or the antiestrogen hydroxytamoxifen is required for ER binding as assayed by gel retardation. The DNA binding domain (DBD) encompasses the highly conserved region C. Both intact ER-E2 complexes and ER mutants truncated for the hormone binding domain (HBD) bind as dimers to an ERE. However, an HBD-truncated ER binds less tightly to an ERE than an intact ER-E2 complex. The DBD and HBD contain a constitutive and a stronger ER-induced dimerization function, respectively. Thus, in addition to inducing the activation function associated with the HBD, estrogen plays a crucial role in the formation of stable ER dimers that bind tightly to ERE.