Coding of sweet,bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways

Mammals can taste a wide repertoire of chemosensory stimuli. Two unrelated families of receptors (T1Rs and T2Rs) mediate responses to sweet, amino acids, and bitter compounds. Here, we demonstrate that knockouts of TRPM5, a taste TRP ion channel, or PLCbeta2, a phospholipase C selectively expressed in taste tissue, abolish sweet, amino acid, and bitter taste reception, but do not impact sour or salty tastes. Therefore, despite relying on different receptors, sweet, amino acid, and bitter transduction converge on common signaling molecules. Using PLCbeta2 taste-blind animals, we then examined a fundamental question in taste perception: how taste modalities are encoded at the cellular level. Mice engineered to rescue PLCbeta2 function exclusively in bitter-receptor expressing cells respond normally to bitter tastants but do not taste sweet or amino acid stimuli. Thus, bitter is encoded independently of sweet and amino acids, and taste receptor cells are not broadly tuned across these modalities.     

Expression of gustducin overlaps with that of type III IP3 receptor in taste buds of the rat soft palate

Type III IP3 receptor (IP3R3) is one of the common critical calcium-signaling molecules for sweet, umami, and bitter signal transduction in taste cells, and the total IP3R3-expressing cell population represents all cells mediating these taste modalities in the taste buds. Although gustducin, a taste cell-specific G-protein, is also involved in sweet, umami, and bitter signal transduction, the expression of gustducin is restricted to different subsets of IP3R3-expressing cells by location in the tongue. Based on the expression patterns of gustducin and taste receptors in the tongue, the function of gustducin has been implicated primarily in bitter taste in the circumvallate (CV) papillae and in sweet taste in the fungiform (FF) papillae. However, in the soft palate (SP), the expression pattern of gustducin remains unclear and little is known about its function. In the present paper, the expression patterns of gustducin and IP3R3 in taste buds of the SP and tongue papillae in the rat were examined by double-color whole-mount immunohistochemistry. Gustducin was expressed in almost all (96.7%) IP3R3-expressing cells in taste buds of the SP, whereas gustducin-positive cells were 42.4% and 60.1% of IP3R3-expressing cells in FF and CV, respectively. Our data suggest that gustducin is involved in signal transduction of all the tastes of sweet, umami, and bitter in the SP, in contrast to its limited function in the tongue.     

The sweet and the bitter of mammalian taste

The discovery of two families of mammalian taste receptors has provided important insights into taste recognition and taste perception. Recent studies have examined the receptors and signaling pathways that mediate sweet, bitter, and amino acid taste detection in mammals. These studies demonstrate that taste cells are selectively tuned to different taste modalities and clarify the logic of taste coding in the periphery.     

Molecular mechanisms underlying the reception and transmission of sour taste information

Taste enables organisms to determine the properties of ingested substances by conveying information regarding the five basic taste modalities: sweet, salty, sour, bitter, and umami. The sweet, salty, and umami taste modalities convey the carbohydrate, electrolyte, and glutamate content of food, indicating its desirability and stimulating appetitive responses. The sour and bitter modalities convey the acidity of food and the presence of potential toxins, respectively, stimulating aversive responses to such tastes. In recent years, the receptors mediating sweet, bitter, and umami tastes have been identified as members of the T1R and T2R G-protein-coupled receptor families; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying sour taste detection have yet to be clearly elucidated. This review covers the molecular mechanisms proposed to mediate the detection and transmission of sour stimuli, focusing on polycystic kidney disease 1-like 3 (Pkd1l3), Pkd2l1, and carbonic anhydrase 4 (Car4).     

Mammalian sweet taste receptors

The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the quality and nutritional value of food. Previously, we identified a large family of mammalian taste receptors involved in bitter taste perception (the T2Rs). We now report the characterization of mammalian sweet taste receptors. First, transgenic rescue experiments prove that the Sac locus encodes T1R3, a member of the T1R family of candidate taste receptors. Second, using a heterologous expression system, we demonstrate that T1R2 and T1R3 combine to function as a sweet receptor, recognizing sweet-tasting molecules as diverse as sucrose, saccharin, dulcin, and acesulfame-K. Finally, we present a detailed analysis of the patterns of expression of T1Rs and T2Rs, thus providing a view of the representation of sweet and bitter taste at the periphery.     

Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection

Abstract Taste perception plays a key role in determining individual food preferences and dietary habits. Individual differences in bitter, sweet, umami, sour, or salty taste perception may influence dietary habits, affecting nutritional status and nutrition-related chronic disease risk. In addition to these traditional taste modalities there is growing evidence that "fat taste" may represent a sixth modality. Several taste receptors have been identified within taste cell membranes on the surface of the tongue, and they include the T2R family of bitter taste receptors, the T1R receptors associated with sweet and umami taste perception, the ion channels PKD1L3 and PKD2L1 linked to sour taste, and the integral membrane protein CD36, which is a putative "fat taste" receptor. Additionally, epithelial sodium channels and a vanilloid receptor, TRPV1, may account for salty taste perception. Common polymorphisms in genes involved in taste perception may account for some of the interindividual differences in food preferences and dietary habits within and between populations. This variability could affect food choices and dietary habits, which may influence nutritional and health status and the risk of chronic disease. This review will summarize the present state of knowledge of the genetic variation in taste, and how such variation might influence food intake behaviors.     

The good taste of peptides

The taste of peptides is seldom one of the most relevant issues when one considers the many important biological functions of this class of molecules. However, peptides generally do have a taste, covering essentially the entire range of established taste modalities: sweet, bitter, umami, sour and salty. The last two modalities cannot be attributed to peptides as such because they are due to the presence of charged terminals and/or charged side chains, thus reflecting only the zwitterionic nature of these compounds and/or the nature of some side chains but not the electronic and/or conformational features of a specific peptide. The other three tastes, that is, sweet, umami and bitter, are represented by different families of peptides. This review describes the main peptides with a sweet, umami or bitter taste and their relationship with food acceptance or rejection. Particular emphasis will be given to the sweet taste modality, owing to the practical and scientific relevance of aspartame, the well‐known sweetener, and to the theoretical importance of sweet proteins, the most potent peptide sweet molecules. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Sweet and bitter tastants specific detection by the taste cell-based sensor

Sweet and bitter tastants specific detection by cell-based sensor is investigated in this paper. Human enteroendocrine NCI-H716 cells, expressing G protein-coupled receptors and sweet receptors (type 1, member 2/type 1, member 3), and human enteroendocrine STC-1 cells, expressing G protein-coupled receptors and bitter receptors (type 2 members) are used as sensing devices. The HEK-293 cells, without taste receptor expression, are used as negative control. The electrochemical impedance spectrum data is recorded and processed by bistable stochastic resonance for signal-to-noise ratio calculation. NCI-H716 cell-based sensor selectively responds to sweeteners and sweet tastant mixtures. STC-1 cell-based sensor selectively responds to bitter tastants and bitter tastant mixtures. The tastants species and concentrations can be decided by signal-to-noise ratio parameters. HEK-293 cell-based sensor lacks the tastants discriminating ability. The taste cell-based sensor is easy to prepare and operate. This work offers a useful way in gustatory mechanism research.     

Receptors for bitter and sweet taste

The identification of two families of receptors, T1Rs and T2Rs, for sweet and bitter taste stimuli has opened the door to understanding some of the basic mechanisms underlying taste transduction in mammals. Studies of the functions of these receptors and their patterns of expression provide important information regarding the detection of structurally diverse taste compounds and the manner in which different taste qualities are encoded in the mouth.     

灵长类苦味受体基因研究进展

在鲜味、甜味、苦味、咸味和酸味5种味觉形式中,苦味能避免动物摄入有毒有害物质,在动物的生存中发挥着特别重要的作用。苦味味觉的产生依赖于苦味物质与苦味受体的相互作用。苦味受体由苦味受体基因Tas2rs编码,此类基因在不同物种中数量变化较大以适应不同的需求。目前的研究在灵长类中鉴别出了若干苦味受体的配体,并发现有的苦味受体基因所经受的选择压在类群之间、基因之间甚至同一基因不同功能区之间都存在着变化。本文从苦味受体作用的多样性特点,受体与配体的对应关系、受体基因进化模式与食性之间的关系、苦味受体基因的适应性进化方面对灵长类苦味受体基因进行了综述,以期为苦味受体基因在灵长类中的深入研究提供参考。     

TIME-INTENSITY PROPERTIES OF SWEET AND BITTER STIMULI: IMPLICATIONS FOR SWEET AND BITTER TASTE CHEMORECEPTION

Interindividual differences in sweet and bitter taste sensitivity were investigated using time-intensity (TI) measurements and multivariate statistics. TI profiles were obtained in triplicate from 25 subjects for 23 sweet and/or bitter stimuli first matched to be approximately equi-intense to 200 mM NaCl. Sweet stimuli, except for the larger sweeteners, were less persistent, and required less time to reach maximum intensity than bitter stimuli. The results of principal component (PCA) and cluster (CA) analyses of the stimuli X subjects matrices for maximum intensity (Imax), time to maximum intensity (Tmax), total duration (Tdur), and area under the curve (Area) suggest that sweet and bitter stimuli do not share common receptors; and that there are at least two receptor mechanisms each for sweet taste (one for sugars and other small compounds, and the other for large sweeteners) and bitter taste (one for PTC/PROP and one for other bitter compounds).     

Modulation of Sweet Taste by Umami Compounds via Sweet Taste Receptor Subunit hT1R2

Although the five basic taste qualities—sweet, sour, bitter, salty and umami—can be recognized by the respective gustatory system, interactions between these taste qualities are often experienced when food is consumed. Specifically, the umami taste has been investigated in terms of whether it enhances or reduces the other taste modalities. These studies, however, are based on individual perception and not on a molecular level. In this study we investigated umami-sweet taste interactions using umami compounds including monosodium glutamate (MSG), 5’-mononucleotides and glutamyl-dipeptides, glutamate-glutamate (Glu-Glu) and glutamate-aspartic acid (Glu-Asp), in human sweet taste receptor hT1R2/hT1R3-expressing cells. The sensitivity of sucrose to hT1R2/hT1R3 was significantly attenuated by MSG and umami active peptides but not by umami active nucleotides. Inhibition of sweet receptor activation by MSG and glutamyl peptides is obvious when sweet receptors are activated by sweeteners that target the extracellular domain (ECD) of T1R2, such as sucrose and acesulfame K, but not by cyclamate, which interact with the T1R3 transmembrane domain (TMD). Application of umami compounds with lactisole, inhibitory drugs that target T1R3, exerted a more severe inhibitory effect. The inhibition was also observed with F778A sweet receptor mutant, which have the defect in function of T1R3 TMD. These results suggest that umami peptides affect sweet taste receptors and this interaction prevents sweet receptor agonists from binding to the T1R2 ECD in an allosteric manner, not to the T1R3. This is the first report to define the interaction between umami and sweet taste receptors.     

The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste

Sweet and umami (the taste of monosodium glutamate) are the main attractive taste modalities in humans. T1Rs are candidate mammalian taste receptors that combine to assemble two heteromeric G-protein-coupled receptor complexes: T1R1+3, an umami sensor, and T1R2+3, a sweet receptor. We now report the behavioral and physiological characterization of T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3 knockout mice. We demonstrate that sweet and umami taste are strictly dependent on T1R-receptors, and show that selective elimination of T1R-subunits differentially abolishes detection and perception of these two taste modalities. To examine the basis of sweet tastant recognition and coding, we engineered animals expressing either the human T1R2-receptor (hT1R2), or a modified opioid-receptor (RASSL) in sweet cells. Expression of hT1R2 in mice generates animals with humanized sweet taste preferences, while expression of RASSL drives strong attraction to a synthetic opiate, demonstrating that sweet cells trigger dedicated behavioral outputs, but their tastant selectivity is determined by the nature of the receptors.     

Apparent specific volumes and tastes of amino acids

The apparent specific volumes of 17 amino acids are determinedand compared with their tastes and predicted ranges of tastereported in earlier work. Most amino acids elicit many basictastes although one taste usually predominates. All D-aminoacids tasted (except proline and hydroxy prohne) are sweet andseven of the L-amino acids are sweet. Ten of the 16 L-aminoacids are bitter but two of these are both bitter and sweetin accordance with prediction from their apparent specific volumes.‘Spatial barriers’ account for the exclusion ofthe larger L-amino acids from sweet receptors. However, D-proline,the only reportedly purely bitter D-amino acid, is cyclic andthis explains its borderline position between the sweet andbitter regions, and the sweet-bitter taste of L-proline. Lowmol. wt amino acids, irrespective of whether they are D- orL-enantiomers, are always sweet, providing that their apparentspecific volumes are below 0.66 and that they do not generatesuprathreshold concentrations of protons. The two dicarboxylicamino acids, glutamic and aspartic are sour. Apparent specificvolumes represent the effective size of solutes in water dueto their intrinsic molecular architecture. The values reportedhere are used to interpret steric exclusion of certain enantiomersfrom the taste receptors. These results support the idea thatapparent specific volume is a determinant of taste quality.     

The sweet taste quality is linked to a cluster of taste fibers in primates: lactisole diminishes preference and responses to sweet in S fibers (sweet best) chorda tympani fibers of M. fascicularis monkey

Background

Psychophysically, sweet and bitter have long been considered separate taste qualities, evident already to the newborn human. The identification of different receptors for sweet and bitter located on separate cells of the taste buds substantiated this separation. However, this finding leads to the next question: is bitter and sweet also kept separated in the next link from the taste buds, the fibers of the taste nerves? Previous studies in non-human primates, P. troglodytes, C. aethiops, M. mulatta, M. fascicularis and C. jacchus, suggest that the sweet and bitter taste qualities are linked to specific groups of fibers called S and Q fibers. In this study we apply a new sweet taste modifier, lactisole, commercially available as a suppressor of the sweetness of sugars on the human tongue, to test our hypothesis that sweet taste is conveyed in S fibers.

Results

We first ascertained that lactisole exerted similar suppression of sweetness in M. fascicularis, as reported in humans, by recording their preference of sweeteners and non- sweeteners with and without lactisole in two-bottle tests. The addition of lactisole significantly diminished the preference for all sweeteners but had no effect on the intake of non-sweet compounds or the intake of water. We then recorded the response to the same taste stimuli in 40 single chorda tympani nerve fibers. Comparison between single fiber nerve responses to stimuli with and without lactisole showed that lactisole only suppressed the responses to sweeteners in S fibers. It had no effect on the responses to any other stimuli in all other taste fibers.

Conclusion

In M. fascicularis, lactisole diminishes the attractiveness of compounds, which taste sweet to humans. This behavior is linked to activity of fibers in the S-cluster. Assuming that lactisole blocks the T1R3 monomer of the sweet taste receptor T1R2/R3, these results present further support for the hypothesis that S fibers convey taste from T1R2/R3 receptors, while the impulse activity in non-S fibers originates from other kinds of receptors. The absence of the effect of lactisole on the faint responses in some S fibers to other stimuli as well as the responses to sweet and non-sweet stimuli in non-S fibers suggest that these responses originate from other taste receptors.     

Taste receptor proteins

The chemistry of taste has eluded widespread investigation until only recently. Of the four basic taste qualities — sweet, salty, sour and bitter, only sweet and to some lesser extent — bitter — have had inroads made on the molecular level. Carbon-14 labeled sugars are preferently bound to taste bud proteins versus other non-sensory proteins. The binding of the sugars is in good agreement with their relative sweetness and graded conformational changes in protein molecules are seen, by a number of methods, upon these interactions. The protein may occur in two forms — soluble and membrane bound, and the bound form can be solubilized. Unique proteins are present in taste buds and would thus differentiate them from other non-sensory proteins. The sweet-sensitive protein activity has been studied in a number of animals, but purification and characterization in all has not proceeded to the point wherein comparisons can be made. Bitter reception has been suggested as the property of a protein from pig tongues, and an enzyme — phosphodiesterase has been found to be both activated and inhibited by bitter compounds. Lipids from gustatory tissue have been suggested as candidates for receptors for salty, sour and bitter, but not sweet stimulants.     

Identification and characterization of human taste receptor genes belonging to the TAS2R family

The sense of taste is a chemosensory system responsible for basic food appraisal. Humans distinguish between five primary tastes: bitter, sweet, sour, salty and umami. The molecular events in the perception of bitter taste are believed to start with the binding of specific water-soluble molecules to G-protein-coupled receptors encoded by the TAS2R/T2R family of taste receptor genes. TAS2R receptors are expressed at the surface of taste receptor cells and are coupled to G proteins and second messenger pathways. We have identified, cloned and characterized 11 new bitter taste receptor genes and four new pseudogenes that belong to the human TAS2R family. Their encoded proteins have between 298 and 333 amino acids and share between 23 and 86% identity with other human TAS2R proteins. Screening of a mono-chromosomal somatic cell hybrid panel to assign the identified bitter taste receptor genes to human chromosomes demonstrated that they are located in chromosomes 7 and 12. Including the 15 sequences identified, the human TAS2R family is composed of 28 full-length genes and 16 pseudogenes. Phylogenetic analyses suggest a classification of the TAS2R genes in five groups that may reflect a specialization in the detection of specific types of bitter chemicals.     

The human bitter taste receptor, hTAS2R16, discriminates slight differences in the configuration of disaccharides

Sweetness and bitterness are key determinants of food acceptance and rejection, respectively. Sugars, such as sucrose and fructose, are generally recognized as sweet. However, not all sugars are sweet, and even anomers may have quite different tastes. For example, gentiobiose is bitter, whereas its anomer, isomaltose, is sweet. Despite this unique sensory character, the molecular basis of the bitterness of gentiobiose remains to be clarified. In this study, we used calcium imaging analysis of human embryonic kidney 293T cells that heterologously expressed human taste receptors to demonstrate that gentiobiose activated hTAS2R16, a bitter taste receptor, but not hT1R2/hT1R3, a sweet taste receptor. In contrast, isomaltose activated hT1R2/hT1R3. As a result, these anomers elicit different taste sensations. Mutational analysis of hTAS2R16 also indicated that gentiobiose and β-d-glucopyranosides, such as salicin share a common binding site of hTAS2R16.     

Partial rescue of taste responses of alpha-gustducin null mice by transgenic expression of alpha-transducin

The transduction of responses to bitter and sweet compounds utilizes guanine nucleotide binding proteins (G proteins) and their coupled receptors. Alpha-gustducin, a transducin-like G protein alpha-subunit, and rod alpha-transducin are expressed in taste receptor cells. Alpha-gustducin knockout mice have profoundly diminished behavioral and electrophysiological responses to many bitter and sweet compounds, although these mice retain residual responses to these compounds. Alpha-gustducin and rod alpha-transducin are biochemically indistinguishable in their in vitro interactions with retinal phosphodiesterase, rhodopsin and G protein betagamma-subunits. To determine if alpha-transducin can function in taste receptor cells and to compare the function of alpha-gustducin versus alpha-transducin in taste transduction in vivo, we generated transgenic mice that express alpha-transducin under the control of the alpha-gustducin promoter in the alpha-gustducin null background. Immunohistochemistry showed that the alpha-transducin transgene was expressed in about two-thirds of the alpha-gustducin lineage of taste receptor cells. Two-bottle preference tests showed that transgenic expression of rod alpha-transducin partly rescued responses to denatonium benzoate, sucrose and the artificial sweetener SC45647, but not to quinine sulfate. Gustatory nerve recordings showed a partial rescue by the transgene of the response to sucrose, SC45647 and quinine, but not to denatonium. These results demonstrate that alpha-transducin can function in taste receptor cells and transduce some taste cell responses. Our results also suggest that alpha-transducin and alpha-gustducin may differ, at least in part, in their function in these cells, although this conclusion must be qualified because of the limited fidelity of the transgene expression.