A SANT motif in the SMRT corepressor interprets the histone code and promotes histone deacetylation

Nuclear receptor corepressors SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors) and N-CoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) recruit histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity to targeted regions of chromatin. These corepressors contain a closely spaced pair of SANT motifs whose sequence and organization is highly conserved. The N-terminal SANT is a critical component of a deacetylase activation domain (DAD) that binds and activates HDAC3. Here, we show that the second SANT motif functions as part of a histone interaction domain (HID). The HID enhances repression by increasing the affinity of the DAD-HDAC3 enzyme for histone substrate. The two SANT motifs synergistically promote histone deacetylation and repression through unique functions. The HID contribution to repression is magnified by its ability to inhibit histone acetyltransferase enzyme activity. Remarkably, the SANT-containing HID preferentially binds to unacetylated histone tails. This implies that the SMRT HID participates in interpreting the histone code in a feed-forward mechanism that promotes and maintains histone deacetylation at genomic sites of SMRT recruitment.     

Role of histone deacetylase in the expression of CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha

Histone acetylation plays an important role in chromatin remodeling and gene expression. The molecular mechanisms involved in cell-specific expression of CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha (CTalpha) are not fully understood. In this study, we investigated whether or not histone deacetylation is involved in repression of CTalpha expression in quiescent C3H10T1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts. We have examined the contributions of the Sp1 and E2F binding sites in the repression of CTalpha gene expression. Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC activity are associated with Sp1 in serum-starved cells or during serum stimulation. However, HDAC1 association with E2F was only detected in serum-starved cells. By chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we detected both direct and indirect association of HDAC1 with the CTalpha promoter. Treatment with the HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A induced CTalpha expression. Our data suggest that HDAC1 plays a critical role in CTalpha repression and that Sp1 and E2F may serve as key targets for HDAC1-mediated CTalpha repression in fibroblasts.     

Mutant p53 binds to estrogen receptor negative promoter via DNMT1 and HDAC1 in MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells

DNA methylation and histone deacetylation are two epigenetic mechanisms involved in the lack of estrogen receptor (ER) expression. Our previous studies demonstrated that mutant p53 along with repression complex proteins including DNMT1, HDAC1 and MeCP2 is associated with ER-negative promoter in MDA-MB-468 cells. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene silencing in these cells, we down-regulated DNMT1 and HDAC1 expression using siRNAs and studied the ability of DNMT1, HDAC1, MeCP2 and p53 in binding to ESR1 promoter CpG island. Our results showed that DNMT1 or HDAC1 down-regulation disassembled the repression complex proteins and mutant p53 from ER-negative promoter. The partial demethylation of ESR1 promoter and ER re-expression in down-regulated cells supports these findings. In vivo binding studies demonstrated that mutation of p53 protein in this cell line did not affect its binding capacity to DNMT1, HDAC1 and MeCP2 proteins. Our observations suggest that not only histone deacetylase activity of HDAC1 contributes to inactivation of methylated ESR1 gene but also HDAC1 presence on ESR1 promoter is important for assembly of DNMT1 in repression complex. In addition, our data revealed that mutant p53 protein binds to the promoter of ESR1 through direct interaction with HDAC1 and indirect interaction with DNMT1, MeCP2 proteins in the ER-negative MDA-MB-468 cells.     

Ligand-induced recruitment of a histone deacetylase in the negative-feedback regulation of the thyrotropin beta gene.

We have investigated ligand-dependent negative regulation of the thyroid-stimulating hormone beta (TSHbeta) gene. Thyroid hormone (T3) markedly repressed activity of the TSHbeta promoter that had been stably integrated into GH(3 )pituitary cells, through the conserved negative regulatory element (NRE) in the promoter. By DNA affinity binding assay, we show that the NRE constitutively binds to the histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) present in GH(3 )cells. Significantly, upon addition of T3, the NRE further recruited the thyroid hormone receptor (TRbeta) and another deacetylase, HDAC2. This recruitment coincided with an alteration of in vivo chromatin structure, as revealed by changes in restriction site accessibility. Supporting the direct interaction between TR and HDAC, in vitro assays showed that TR, through its DNA binding domain, strongly bound to HDAC2. Consistent with the role for HDACs in negative regulation, an inhibitor of the enzymes, trichostatin A, attenuated T3-dependent promoter repression. We suggest that ligand-dependent histone deacetylase recruitment is a mechanism of the negative-feedback regulation, a critical function of the pituitary-thyroid axis.     

Role of histone deacetylation in cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase

Histone acetylation plays an important role in chromatin remodeling and gene expression. The molecular mechanisms involved in cell-specific expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) are not fully understood. In this study we investigated whether histone deacetylation was involved in repression of eNOS expression in non-endothelial cells. Induction of eNOS expression by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) and sodium butyrate was observed in all four different types of non-endothelial cells examined. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that the induction of eNOS expression by TSA was accompanied by a remarkable increase of acetylation of histone H3 associated with the eNOS 5'-flanking region in the non-endothelial cells. Moreover, DNA methylation-mediated repression of eNOS promoter activity was partially reversed by TSA treatment, and combined treatment of TSA and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AzadC) synergistically induced eNOS expression in non-endothelial cells. The proximal Sp1 site is critical for basal activity of eNOS promoter. The induction of eNOS by inhibition of HDACs in non-endothelial cells, however, appeared not mediated by the changes in Sp1 DNA binding activity. We further showed that Sp1 bound to the endogenous eNOS promoter and associated with HDAC1 in non-endothelial HeLa cells. Combined TSA and AzadC treatment increased Sp1 binding to the endogenous eNOS promoter but decreased the association between HDAC1 and Sp1 in HeLa cells. Our data suggest that HDAC1 plays a critical role in eNOS repression, and the proximal Sp1 site may serve a key target for HDCA1-mediated eNOS repression in non-endothelial cells.