泛素连接酶E3

蛋白质的泛素化修饰具有高度的特异性,它参与调节细胞内许多的生理活动。蛋白质的泛素化修饰涉及一系列的酶参与反应,包括泛素激活酶E1、结合酶E2以及连接酶E3。而其中泛素连接酶E3对靶蛋白的特异性识别起关键作用。泛素连接酶E3主要由HECT结构域家族、RING结构域家族和U-box结构域家族组成。现对泛素连接酶E3的分类、结构及其对靶蛋白的识别机制等进行综述。     

蛋白质SUMO化和泛素化修饰的关系

泛素化和SUMO化是蛋白质翻译后修饰的重要方式,广泛参与调节蛋白质功能和细胞生命活动各个环节。多聚泛素化降解蛋白质,而SUMO化主要调节蛋白质的相互作用和定位等。在不同情况下,SUMO化和泛素化既可协同调节蛋白质功能,也可相互拮抗。最近研究发现,某些底物的SUMO化能够激活体内一类新发现的SUMO依赖的泛素连接酶,启动泛素-蛋白酶体途径降解底物,导致蛋白质SUMO化和汔素化的关系进一步精细化和复杂化。     

泛素链水解酶的选择性和产生机制

底物蛋白的多聚泛素链修饰参与调节多种生命运动过程(包括蛋白质降解、自噬、DNA损伤修复、细胞周期、信号转导、基因表达、转录调节、炎症免疫等).去泛素化酶通过水解底物蛋白的单泛素和泛素链修饰,对泛素相关过程进行反向调节.人类基因组中约含90余种去泛素化酶,它们通过对自身酶活性和底物识别特异性的调节,实现了对细胞内复杂泛素过程的精密且层次性的调控.本文针对去泛素化酶对不同泛素链的识别选择性,综述目前已知泛素链水解酶的选择性和产生机制.     

泛素连接酶-底物选择关系的研究进展

泛素是一种包含76个氨基酸的小分子蛋白。泛素共价结合到底物的过程称为泛素化修饰。泛素化修饰过程是一个由级联的泛素激活酶、泛素结合酶和泛素连接酶所介导的复杂过程,泛素化修饰具有高效、ATP依赖、高度特异的特点。泛素化修饰与细胞周期调控、细胞凋亡、转录调控、DNA损伤修复等一系列生物学过程密切相关。在泛素化修饰过程中,泛素连接酶对底物的识别,是决定泛素化修饰特异性的关键环节。泛素连接酶底物识别的相关机制研究不断被报道,鉴定泛素连接酶底物的高通量方法也在不断的改进和发展。随着实验研究的不断深入,实验数据的不断产出,利用生物信息学进行泛素连接酶底物的研究也开始受到关注。对泛素连接酶识别底物的相关机制、高通量泛素连接酶底物的鉴定方法、泛素连接酶底物的生物信息学研究和生物信息学在泛素连接酶底物研究中的发展方向进行讨论。     

泛素蛋白酶体途径及其对植物生长发育的调控

泛素蛋白酶体途径主要由泛素活化酶、泛素结合酶、泛素蛋白连接酶和26S蛋白酶体组成。泛素活化酶首先激活泛素分子,然后把泛素转移到泛素结合酶上。泛素结合酶结合泛素蛋白连接酶并把泛素转移到底物蛋白上使底物泛素化,或把泛素转移到泛素蛋白连接酶再使底物泛素化。泛素化的蛋白通常通过26S蛋白酶体进行降解。初步的研究结果表明,植物生长发育的很多方面受泛素蛋白酶体介导的蛋白降解途径的调控。     

泛素蛋白酶体途径及其对植物生长发育的调控

泛素蛋白酶体途径主要由泛素活化酶、泛素结合酶、泛素蛋白连接酶和26S蛋白酶体组成。泛素活化酶首先激活泛素分子, 然后把泛素转移到泛素结合酶上。泛素结合酶结合泛素蛋白连接酶并把泛素转移到底物蛋白上使底物泛素化, 或把泛素转移到泛素蛋白连接酶再使底物泛素化。泛素化的蛋白通常通过26S蛋白酶体进行降解。初步的研究结果表明, 植物生长发育的很多方面受泛素蛋白酶体介导的蛋白降解途径的调控。     

病原菌调节宿主细胞泛素化途径的研究进展

泛素化是真核生物特有的蛋白质翻译后修饰,广泛地参与宿主细胞各种信号通路和生理过程.病原菌常通过分泌毒性效应蛋白,对泛素和泛素结合酶进行独特的共价修饰,或者利用泛素连接酶和去泛素化酶的酶学活性,调节宿主泛素化过程,从而干扰宿主细胞的信号转导,促进细菌的感染和生存.本文概述了病原菌效应蛋白调节宿主泛素化途径的主要研究进展和最新发现.     

线性泛素化修饰研究进展

蛋白质泛素化修饰过程在调节各种细胞生物学功能的过程中发挥了非常重要的作用,如细胞周期进程、DNA损伤修复、信号转导和各种蛋白质膜定位等。泛素化修饰可分为多聚泛素化修饰和单泛素化修饰。多聚泛素化修饰系统可以通过对底物连接不同类型的多泛素化链调节蛋白质的功能。多聚泛素化修饰中已知7种泛素链连接方式均为泛素内赖氨酸连接方式。近几年发现了第8种类型的泛素链连接形式即线性泛素化,其泛素链的连接方式是由泛素甲硫氨酸的氨基基团与另一泛素甘氨酸的羧基基团相连形成泛素链标记。目前研究表明线性泛素化修饰在先天性免疫和炎症反应等多个过程中发挥着非常重要的作用。募集线性泛素链的泛素连接酶E3被称为LUBAC复合体,其组成底物以及其活性调控机制和功能所知甚少。本文综述了募集线性泛素化链的泛素连接酶、去泛素化酶、底物等活性调控机制及其在先天性免疫等多个领域中的功能,分析了后续研究方向,以期为相关研究提供参考。     

泛素连接酶和去泛素化酶在帕金森病中的作用

中脑黑质多巴胺能神经元特异性损伤和α突触核蛋白聚集的分子机制是帕金森病（Parkinson’s disease,PD）研究领域亟待解决的问题。蛋白质异常聚集很大程度上是由于泛素-蛋白酶体系统（ubiquitin-proteasome system,UPS）功能障碍引起的。蛋白质泛素化由一系列泛素化酶级联反应促进，并受去泛素化酶（deubiquitylases,DUBs）的反向调节。泛素化和去泛素化过程异常导致蛋白质异常聚集和包涵体形成，进而损伤神经元。近来研究报道，蛋白质的泛素化和去泛素化修饰在PD的发病机制中发挥重要作用。E3泛素连接酶促进蛋白质的泛素化，有利于α突触核蛋白的清除、促进多巴胺能神经元的存活、维持线粒体的功能等。DUBs可以去掉底物蛋白质的泛素化修饰，抑制α突触核蛋白的降解，调控线粒体的功能和神经元内铁的稳态。本文以E3泛素连接酶和DUBs为切入点，综述了蛋白质泛素化和去泛素化修饰参与多巴胺能神经元损伤机制的最新研究进展。     

植物蛋白的体外泛素化检测方法

泛素激活酶(E1)、泛素耦联酶(E2)和泛素连接酶(E3)是蛋白质泛素化修饰的关键酶。在真核基因组上有大量基因编码这些泛素化相关的酶类或蛋白。检测这些泛素化修饰酶及其底物蛋白的生化特性和特异性是分析其生物学功能的重要内容。该文提供了一种简便快速检测体外泛素化反应的方法, 不仅可通过检测对DTT敏感的硫酯键的形成来判断E2的活性、检测E3的体外泛素化活性, 而且可以检测E2-E3和E3-底物的特异性。所用蛋白主要来源于拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana), 包括分属于绝大多数E2亚家族的成员, 可用于不同RING类型E3的活性检测。该方法不仅可以采用多种E2进行E3活性分析, 而且可以分析不同组合的E2-RING E3、RING E3-底物的泛素化活性等, 亦可应用于真核生物蛋白质尤其是植物蛋白的体外泛素化活性分析。     

The emerging family of CULLIN3‐RING ubiquitin ligases (CRL3s): cellular functions and disease implications

Protein ubiquitylation is a post‐translational modification that controls all aspects of eukaryotic cell functionality, and its defective regulation is manifested in various human diseases. The ubiquitylation process requires a set of enzymes, of which the ubiquitin ligases (E3s) are the substrate recognition components. Modular CULLIN‐RING ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) are the most prevalent class of E3s, comprising hundreds of distinct CRL complexes with the potential to recruit as many and even more protein substrates. Best understood at both structural and functional levels are CRL1 or SCF (SKP1/CUL1/F‐box protein) complexes, representing the founding member of this class of multimeric E3s. Another CRL subfamily, called CRL3, is composed of the molecular scaffold CULLIN3 and the RING protein RBX1, in combination with one of numerous BTB domain proteins acting as substrate adaptors. Recent work has firmly established CRL3s as major regulators of different cellular and developmental processes as well as stress responses in both metazoans and higher plants. In humans, functional alterations of CRL3s have been associated with various pathologies, including metabolic disorders, muscle, and nerve degeneration, as well as cancer. In this review, we summarize recent discoveries on the function of CRL3s in both metazoans and plants, and discuss their mode of regulation and specificities.     

Ubiquitin Signaling Regulates RNA Biogenesis,Processing, and Metabolism

The fate of eukaryotic proteins, from their synthesis to destruction, is supervised by the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS). The UPS is the primary pathway responsible for selective proteolysis of intracellular proteins, which is guided by covalent attachment of ubiquitin to target proteins by E1 (activating), E2 (conjugating), and E3 (ligating) enzymes in a process known as ubiquitylation. The UPS can also regulate protein synthesis by influencing multiple steps of RNA (ribonucleic acid) metabolism. Here, recent publications concerning the interplay between the UPS and different types of RNA are reviewed. This interplay mainly involves specific RNA-binding E3 ligases that link RNA-dependent processes with protein ubiquitylation. The emerging understanding of their modes of RNA binding, their RNA targets, and their molecular and cellular functions are primarily focused on. It is discussed how the UPS adapted to interact with different types of RNA and how RNA molecules influence the ubiquitin signaling components.     

Interaction Between Syntaxin 8 and HECTd3, a HECT Domain Ligase

Ubiquitination of proteins and their degradation within the proteasome has emerged as the major proteolytic mechanism used by mammalian cells to regulate cytosolic and nuclear protein levels. Substrate ubiquitylation is mediated by ubiquitin (Ub) ligases, also called E3 Ub ligases. HECT-E3 Ub ligases are characterized by the presence of a C-terminal HECT domain that contains the active site for Ub transfer onto substrates. Among the many E3 Ub ligases, the family homologous to E6-Ap C-terminus (HECT) E3 Ub ligases, which includes the yeast protein Rsp5p and the mammalian homolog NEDD4, AIP4/Itch, and Smurf, has been shown to ubiquitylate membrane proteins and, in some instances, to induce their degradation. In this report, we have identified Syntaxin 8 as a binding protein to a novel HECT domain protein, HECT domain containing 3 (HECTd3), by yeast two-hybrid screen. Besides HECT domain, HECTd3 contains an anaphase-promoting complex, subunit 10 (APC10) domain. Our co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that Syntaxin 8 directly interacts with HECTd3 and that the overexpression of HECTd3 promotes the ubiquitination of Syntaxin 8. Immunofluorescence results show that Syntaxin 8 and HECTd3 have similar subcellular localization.     

Comparison of substrate specificity of the ubiquitin ligases Nedd4 and Nedd4‐2 using proteome arrays

Target recognition by the ubiquitin system is mediated by E3 ubiquitin ligases. Nedd4 family members are E3 ligases comprised of a C2 domain, 2–4 WW domains that bind PY motifs (L/PPxY) and a ubiquitin ligase HECT domain. The nine Nedd4 family proteins in mammals include two close relatives: Nedd4 (Nedd4‐1) and Nedd4L (Nedd4‐2), but their global substrate recognition or differences in substrate specificity are unknown. We performed in vitro ubiquitylation and binding assays of human Nedd4‐1 and Nedd4‐2, and rat‐Nedd4‐1, using protein microarrays spotted with ～8200 human proteins. Top hits (substrates) for the ubiquitylation and binding assays mostly contain PY motifs. Although several substrates were recognized by both Nedd4‐1 and Nedd4‐2, others were specific to only one, with several Tyr kinases preferred by Nedd4‐1 and some ion channels by Nedd4‐2; this was subsequently validated in vivo. Accordingly, Nedd4‐1 knockdown or knockout in cells led to sustained signalling via some of its substrate Tyr kinases (e.g. FGFR), suggesting Nedd4‐1 suppresses their signalling. These results demonstrate the feasibility of identifying substrates and deciphering substrate specificity of mammalian E3 ligases.     

Ubiquitin ligases, critical mediators of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) represents the primary means of quality control within the secretory pathway. Critical to this process are ubiquitin protein ligases (E3s) which, together with ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s), mediate the ubiquitylation of proteins targeted for degradation from the ER. In this chapter we review our knowledge of both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian ERAD ubiquitin ligases. We focus on recent insights into these E3s, their associated proteins and potential mechanisms of action.     

Identification of Elongin C and Skp1 sequences that determine Cullin selection

The multiprotein von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor and Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein (SCF) complexes belong to families of structurally related E3 ubiquitin ligases. In the VHL ubiquitin ligase, the VHL protein serves as the substrate recognition subunit, which is linked by the adaptor protein Elongin C to a heterodimeric Cul2/Rbx1 module that activates ubiquitylation of target proteins by the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc5. In SCF ubiquitin ligases, F-box proteins serve as substrate recognition subunits, which are linked by the Elongin C-like adaptor protein Skp1 to a Cul1/Rbx1 module that activates ubiquitylation of target proteins, in most cases by the E2 Cdc34. In this report, we investigate the functions of the Elongin C and Skp1 proteins in reconstitution of VHL and SCF ubiquitin ligases. We identify Elongin C and Skp1 structural elements responsible for selective interaction with their cognate Cullin/Rbx1 modules. In addition, using altered specificity Elongin C and F-box protein mutants, we investigate models for the mechanism underlying E2 selection by VHL and SCF ubiquitin ligases. Our findings provide evidence that E2 selection by VHL and SCF ubiquitin ligases is determined not solely by the Cullin/Rbx1 module, the target protein, or the integrity of the substrate recognition subunit but by yet to be elucidated features of these macromolecular complexes.     

Regulating the Regulators: Recent Revelations in the Control of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases

Since its discovery as a post-translational signal for protein degradation, our understanding of ubiquitin (Ub) has vastly evolved. Today, we recognize that the role of Ub signaling is expansive and encompasses diverse processes including cell division, the DNA damage response, cellular immune signaling, and even organismal development. With such a wide range of functions comes a wide range of regulatory mechanisms that control the activity of the ubiquitylation machinery. Ub attachment to substrates occurs through the sequential action of three classes of enzymes, E1s, E2s, and E3s. In humans, there are 2 E1s, ∼35 E2s, and hundreds of E3s that work to attach Ub to thousands of cellular substrates. Regulation of ubiquitylation can occur at each stage of the stepwise Ub transfer process, and substrates can also impact their own modification. Recent studies have revealed elegant mechanisms that have evolved to control the activity of the enzymes involved. In this minireview, we highlight recent discoveries that define some of the various mechanisms by which the activities of E3-Ub ligases are regulated.     

Ubiquitin ligase adaptors: Regulators of ubiquitylation and endocytosis of plasma membrane proteins

The subcellular localization of plasma membrane proteins, such as receptors and transporters, must be finely tuned so that they can be readily downregulated in response to environmental cues. Some of these membrane proteins are post-translationally modified by conjugation to ubiquitin, which is used as a molecular tag to commit them to the endocytic pathway and promote their subsequent delivery to the lysosomes for degradation. This ubiquitylation step, which is performed by so-called ubiquitin ligases (or E3), appears therefore as a critical event for endocytosis and is subject to many levels of regulation. In this review, we focus on the regulation of cargo ubiquitylation by accessory proteins, or “adaptors”, and discuss the various ways by which they promote the action of ubiquitin ligases toward their specific cargoes. Common features emerge on this mode of regulation, which is present from yeast to human, regardless of the type of ubiquitin ligase in charge of the ubiquitylation. Finally, because these adaptors represent an additional layer of specificity in the ubiquitylation cascade, and can themselves be subject to a complex regulation, they are essential actors in the fine-tuning of endocytosis.