Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the nervous system of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoronopsis harmeri</Emphasis> Pixell, 1912 (Lophophorata: Phoronida)

The microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the nervous system of Phoronopsis harmeri was investigated using histological techniques and electron microscopy. The collar nerve ring is basically formed by circular nerve fibers originating from sensitive cells of tentacles. The dorsal nerve plexus principally consists of large motor neurons. It is shown for the first time that the sensitive collar nerve ring immediately passes into the motor dorsal nerve plexus. The basic components of the nervous system have similar cytoarchitectonics and a layered structure. The first layer is formed by numerous nerve fibers surrounded by the processes of glia-like cells. The bodies of glia-like cells constitute the second layer. The third layer consists of neuron bodies overarched by the bodies of epidermal cells. The giant nervous fiber is accompanied by more than one hundred nerve fibers of a common structure and, thus, marks the true longitudinal nerve. The phoronids possess one or two longitudinal nerves. It is supposed that the plexus nature of the nervous system in phoronids may be related to their phylogenesis. A comparison of the nervous system organization and body plans among the Lophophorata suggests that the nervous system of phoronids cannot be considered as a reductive variant of the brachiopod nervous system. At the same time, the structure of the nervous system of bryozoans can be derived from that of phoronids.     

The phylogenetic position of entoprocta, ectoprocta, phoronida, and brachiopoda

Ectoprocts, phoronids and brachiopods are often dealt with underthe heading Tentaculata or Lophophorata, sometimes with entoproctsdiscussed in the same chapter, for example in Ruppert and Barnes(1994). The Lophophorata is purported to be held together bythe presence of a "lophophore," a mesosomal tentacle crown withan upstream-collecting ciliary band. However, the mesosomaltentacle crown of pterobranchs has upstream-collecting ciliarybands with monociliate cells, similar to those of phoronidsand brachiopods, although its ontogeny is not well documented.On the contrary, the ectoproct tentacle crown carries a ciliarysieving system with multiciliate cells and the body does notshow archimery, neither during ontogeny nor during budding,so the tentacles cannot be characterized as mesosomal. The entoproctshave tentacles without coelomic canals and with a downstream-collectingciliary system like that of trochophore larvae and adult rotifersand serpulid and sabellid annelids. Planktotrophic phoronidand brachiopod larvae develop tentacles at an early stage, buttheir ciliary system resembles those of echinoderm and enteropneustlarvae. Ectoproct larvae are generally non-feeding, but theplanktotrophic cyphonautes larvae of certain gymnolaemates havea ciliary band resembling that of the adult tentacles. The entoproctshave typical trochophore larvae and many feed with downstream-collectingciliary bands. Phoronids and brachiopods are thus morphologicallyon the deuterostome line, probably as the sister group of the"Neorenalia" or Deuterostomia sensu stricto. The entoproctsare clearly spiralians, although their more precise positionhas not been determined. The position of the ectoprocts is uncertain,but nothing in their morphology indicates deuterostome affinities."Lophophorata" is thus a polyphyletic assemblage and the wordshould disappear from the zoological vocabulary, just as "Vermes"disappeared many years ago.     

Structure of the brachiopod lophophore

Data on the development, structure, and functional morphology of the brachiopod lophophore are analyzed. The common origin of the tentacle apparatus in Lophophorata from the postoral ciliary band of the larva is shown. The brachiopod lophophore is based on the brachial axis consisting of the brachial fold running along the row of tentacles. The brachial axis may be attached to the brachial (dorsal) mantle lobe (trocholophe, schizolophe, and ptycholophe lophophores) or extend freely into the mantle cavity to form coiling brachia (spirolophe, zygolophe, and plectolophe lophophores). The circulation of water flows through the mantle cavity in the brachiopods with attached and free lophophores is described. A new hypothesis on the sorting of particles suspended in water during filtration is proposed.     

Body cavities in bryozoans: Functional and phylogenetic implications

Based on morphological evidence, Bryozoa together with Phoronida and Brachiopoda are traditionally combined in the group Lophophorata, although this view has been recently challenged by molecular studies. The core of the concept lies in the presence of the lophophore as well as the nature and arrangement of the body cavities. Bryozoa are the least known in this respect. Here, we focused on the fine structure of the body cavity in 12 bryozoan species: 6 gymnolaemates, 3 stenolaemates and 3 phylactolaemates. In gymnolaemates, the complete epithelial lining of the body cavity is restricted to the lophophore, gut walls, and tentacle sheath. By contrast, the cystid walls are composed only of the ectocyst-producing epidermis without a coelothelium, or an underlying extracellular matrix; only the storage cells and cells of the funicular system contact the epidermis. The nature of the main body cavity in gymnolaemates is unique and may be considered as a secondarily modified coelom. In cyclostomes, both the lophophoral and endosaccal cavities are completely lined with coelothelium, while the exosaccal cavity only has the epidermis along the cystid wall. In gymnolaemates, the lophophore and trunk cavities are divided by an incomplete septum and communicate through two pores. In cyclostomes, the septum has a similar location, but no openings. In Phylactolaemata, the body cavity is undivided: the lophophore and trunk coeloms merge at the bases of the lophophore arms, the epistome cavity joins the trunk, and the forked canal opens into the arm coelom. The coelomic lining of the body is complete except for the epistome, lophophoral arms, and the basal portions of the tentacles, where the cells do not interlock perfectly (this design probably facilitates the ammonia excretion). The observed partitioning of the body cavity in bryozoans differs from that in phoronids and brachiopods, and contradicts the Lophophorata concept.     

Particle capture in ciliary filter‐feeding gymnolaemate and phylactolaemate bryozoans – a comparative study

Riisgård, H.U., Okamura, B. and Funch, P. 2009. Particle capture in ciliary filter‐feeding gymnolaemate and phylactolaemate bryozoans – a comparative study. —Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 91 : 416–425. We studied particle capture using video‐microscopy in two gymnolaemates, the marine cheilostome Electra pilosa and the freshwater ctenostome Paludicella articulata, and three phylactolaemates, Fredericella sultana with a circular funnel‐shaped lophophore, and Cristatella mucedo and Lophophus crystallinus, both with a horseshoe‐shaped lophophore. The video‐microscope observations along with studies of lophophore morphology and ultrastructure indicated that phylactolaemate and gymnolaemate bryozoans with a diversity of lophophore shapes rely on the same basic structures and mechanisms for particle capture. Our study also demonstrates that essential features of the particle capture process resemble one another in bryozoans, brachiopods and phoronids.     

Architecture and function of the lophophore in the problematic brachiopod Heliomedusa orienta (Early Cambrian, South China)

The detailed structure of the lophophore is a key diagnostic character in the definition of higher brachiopod taxa. The problematic Heliomedusa orienta Sun and Hou, from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte of Yunnan, southwestern China, has a well-preserved lophophore, which is unlike that of any known extant or extinct brachiopods. Based on a comparative study of lophophore disposition in H. orienta and the extant discinid Pelagodiscus atlanticus, the in- and excurrent pattern and shell orientation of H. orienta are described and discussed. Reconstructions of lophophore shape and function are based on numerous specimens and comparison with P. atlanticus. The lophophore is composed of a pair of lophophoral arms that freely arch posteriorly rather than coiling anteriorly as commonly seen in fossil and recent lingulids. The lophophore is attached to the dorsal lobe of the mantle; it has neither calcareous nor chitinous supporting structures, and is disposed symmetrically on either side of the valve midline. The mouth can be inferred to be located at the base of the two brachial tubes, slightly posterior to the anterodorsal projection of the body wall. The lophophoral arms bear laterofrontal tentacles with a double row of cilia along their lateral edge, as in extant lingulid brachiopods. The main brachial axes are also ciliated, which presumably facilitated transport of mucous-bound nutrient particles to the mouth. The unique organization of the lophophore in Heliomedusa is not like any known fossil and living brachiopods. This clearly demonstrates that H. orienta is not a member of any crown group. It is here considered as a member of the brachiopod stem group, which challenges recent interpretations of a close discinid affinity.     

Evidence from Hox genes that bryozoans are lophotrochozoans

Bryozoans, or moss animals, are small colonial organisms that possess a suspension-feeding apparatus called a lophophore. Traditionally, this "phylum" has been grouped with brachiopods and phoronids because of the feeding structure. Available molecular and morphological data refute this notion of a monophyletic "Lophophorata." Alternative hypotheses place bryozoans either at the base of the Lophotrochozoa or basal to the Lophotrochozoa/Ecdysozoa split. Surprisingly, the only molecular data bearing on this issue are from the 18S nuclear ribosomal gene. Here we report the results of a Hox gene survey using degenerate polymerase chain reaction primers in a gymnolaemate bryozoan, Bugula turrita. Putative orthologs to both the Post2 and the Lox5 genes were found, suggesting that bryozoans are not a basal protostome group but closely allied to other lophotrochozoan taxa. We also found the first definitive evidence of two Deformed/Hox4 class genes in a nonvertebrate animal.     

Filter feeding mechanism in the phoronid <Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoronopsis harmeri</Emphasis> (Phoronida,Lophophorata)

Phoronids, like other Lophophorata (Bryozoa and Brachiopoda) are filter feeders. The lophophore performs various functions, the most important of which is the collection and sorting of food particles. The mechanism of sorting has been well studied for many other groups of invertebrate, but until now it has remained obscure for phoronids. With the help of functional morphology data we are proposing a possible scheme of sorting in phoronids on the example of Phoronopsis harmeri. The lower limit of the particle size is defined by the distance between laterofrontal cilia of tentacles and equals 1.2 μm. Larger particles are transferred by frontal cilia to the basis of the tentacles, where they pass into the lophophoral groove. The distance between the epistome and the external row of tentacles regulates the upper limit of the particle size that are suitable for food. Only particles whose size does not exceed 12 μm get into the lophophoral groove and further into the mouth. Larger particles collect in the space above the epistome and are removed from the lophophore. The size of the food particles that phoronids consume by filtration lies in a range 1.2–12 μm. These are bacteria and small phytoplankton organisms. At the same time the significant individual mobility of the phoronid tentacles plays an important role in the expansion of the pabular spectrum to large inactive zooplankton and phytoplankton organisms reaching a size of 50–100 μm.     

Myoanatomy and serotonergic nervous system of plumatellid and fredericellid phylactolaemata (lophotrochozoa,ectoprocta)

The phylogenetic position of the Ectoprocta within the Lophotrochozoa is discussed controversially. For gaining more insight into ectoproct relationships and comparing it with other potentially related phyla, we analysed the myoanatomy and serotonergic nervous system of adult representatives of the Phylactolaemata (Plumatella emarginata, Plumatellavaihiriae, Plumatella fungosa, Fredericella sultana). The bodywall contains a mesh of circular and longitudinal muscles. On its distal end, the orifice possesses a prominent sphincter and continues into the vestibular wall, which has longitudinal and circular musculature. The tentacle sheath carries mostly longitudinal muscle fibres in Plumatella sp., whereas F. sultana also possesses regular circular muscle fibres. Three groups of muscles are associated with the lophophore: 1) Lophophoral arm muscles (missing in Fredericella), 2) epistome musculature and 3) tentacle musculature. The epistome flap is encompassed by smooth muscle fibres. A few fibres extend medially over the ganglion to its proximal floor. Abfrontal tentacle muscles have diagonally arranged muscle fibres in their proximal region, whereas the distal region is formed by a stack of muscles that resemble an inverted ‘V’. Frontal tentacle muscles show more variation and either possess one or two bases. The digestive tract possesses circular musculature which is striated except at the intestine where it is composed of smooth muscle fibres. The serotonergic nervous system is concentrated in the cerebral ganglion. From the latter a serotonergic nerve extends to each tentacle base. In Plumatella the inner row of tentacles at the lophophoral concavity lacks serotonergic nerves. Bodywall musculature is a common feature in many lophotrochozoan phyla, but among other filter feeders like the Ectoprocta is only present in the ‘lophophorate’ Phoronida. The longitudinal tentacle musculature is reminiscent of the condition found in phoronids and brachiopods, but differs to entoproct tentacles. Although this study shows some support for the ‘Lophophorata’, more comparative analyses of possibly related phyla are required. J. Morphol., 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The nervous system in the cyclostome bryozoan <Emphasis Type="Italic">Crisia eburnea</Emphasis> as revealed by transmission electron and confocal laser scanning microscopy

Introduction

Among bryozoans, cyclostome anatomy is the least studied by modern methods. New data on the nervous system fill the gap in our knowledge and make morphological analysis much more fruitful to resolve some questions of bryozoan evolution and phylogeny.

Results

The nervous system of cyclostome Crisia eburnea was studied by transmission electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The cerebral ganglion has an upper concavity and a small inner cavity filled with cilia and microvilli, thus exhibiting features of neuroepithelium. The cerebral ganglion is associated with the circumoral nerve ring, the circumpharyngeal nerve ring, and the outer nerve ring. Each tentacle has six longitudinal neurite bundles. The body wall is innervated by thick paired longitudinal nerves. Circular nerves are associated with atrial sphincter. A membranous sac, cardia, and caecum all have nervous plexus.

Conclusion

The nervous system of the cyclostome C. eburnea combines phylactolaemate and gymnolaemate features. Innervation of tentacles by six neurite bundles is similar of that in Phylactolaemata. The presence of circumpharyngeal nerve ring and outer nerve ring is characteristic of both, Cyclostomata and Gymnolaemata. The structure of the cerebral ganglion may be regarded as a result of transformation of hypothetical ancestral neuroepithelium. Primitive cerebral ganglion and combination of nerve plexus and cords in the nervous system of C. eburnea allows to suggest that the nerve system topography of C. eburnea may represent an ancestral state of nervous system organization in Bryozoa. Several scenarios describing evolution of the cerebral ganglion in different bryozoan groups are proposed.

     

Rejection Mechanism of Plectolophous Lophophore of Brachiopod <Emphasis Type="Italic">Coptothyris grayi</Emphasis> (Terebratulida,Rhynchonelliformea)

Brachiopoda is a relict group of invertebrate filter feeders that used a tentacle organ, lophophore, for capturing food particles from the water column. Brachiopod extinction apparently occurred due to low productivity of their filtering organ in comparison with more advanced filter-feeders. Investigation of the filtering mechanism of modern brachiopods is essential to understanding their evolutionary fate. This study is devoted to the rejection mechanism of large waste particles from the plectolophous lophophore of brachiopod Coptothyris grayi. The waste particles gather inside of the lophophore on the outer side of the brachial fold. The particles form rows along frontal grooves of outer tentacles and are carried successively to the tentacle tips and move along them, slimed by mucus. One portion of the particles comes off the lophophore and falls down the mantle, while another part is carried to the abfrontal surface of the tentacles. Due to repeated reversals of abfrontal cilia, the particles wavily move along the abfrontal surface of tentacles. Such movement contributes to the secretion of mucus and the formation of particle clots. The clots come off the lophophore and fall down the mantle. The particles are transported along the mantle by cilia to the anterior part of the mantle margin. Here the ciliary reversals that facilitate secretion of mucus and formation of pseudofeces also take place. The latter takes away from the mantle cavity. Thus, only outer tentacles participate in the rejection of large waste particles from the lophophore. Ciliary reversals of the abfrontal surface of tentacles and the mantle are discovered in brachiopods for the first time. This facilitates the additional secretion of mucus and formation of pseudofeces, easing their exit from the mantle cavity. The results contribute to the knowledge of lophophore function and evolution of tentacle organs in Bilateria.     

On the organization of the lophophore in phoronids (Lophophorata: Phoronida)

The organization of the lophophore is the main feature used for the identification of phoronid species. The structure of the lophophore and tentacles in seven phoronid species (Phoronis ovalis, P. ijimai, P. hippocrepia, P. svetlanae, P. australis, Phoronopsis harmeri, and Ph. malakhovi) collected in different areas of the World Ocean was studied. Two new patterns of the phoronid lophophore structure were found: “transition to horseshoe-shaped” (as in P. ovalis from Aniva Bay and in P. ijimai from the coast of Iturup Island, Sea of Okhotsk) and “transition to spiral” (in burrowing specimens P. hippocrepia from Aniva Bay, P. svetlanae and Ph. harmeri from Vostok Bay, Sea of Japan). For the first time it was shown that phoronid species with different types of the lophophore structure possess different kinds of tentacles. Thus, five types of phoronid tentacles were identified that vary in the shape of their cross section: rounded, oval, ellipsoid, rectangular, and skittle-shaped. A correlation was found between lophophore organization and the type of tentacles in phoronids. A table of the correlation between body size, lophophore organization, tentacle structure, and mode of life in different phoronid species is proposed.     

18S rRNA suggests that Entoprocta are protostomes,unrelated to Ectoprocta

The Ento- and Ectoprocta are sometimes placed together in the Bryozoa, which have variously been regarded as proto- or deuterostomes. However, Entoprocta have also been allied to the pseudocoelomates, while Ectoprocta are often united with the Brachiopoda and Phoronida in the (super)phylum Lophophorata. Hence, the phylogenetic relationships of these taxa are still much debated. We determined complete 18S rRNA sequences of two entoprocts, an ectoproct, an inarticulate brachiopod, a phoronid, two annelids, and a platyhelminth. Phylogenetic analyses of these data show that (1) entoprocts and lophophorates have spiralian, protostomous affinities, (2) Ento- and Ectoprocta are not sister taxa, (3) phoronids and brachiopods form a monophyletic clade, and (4) neither Ectoprocta or Annelida appear to be monophyletic. Both deuterostomous and pseudocoelomate features may have arisen at least two times in evolutionary history. These results advocate a Spiralia-Radialia-based classification rather than one based on the Protostomia-Deuterostomia concept. Correspondence to: J.R. Garey     

Larval development of Brachiopod <Emphasis Type="Italic">Coptothyris grayi</Emphasis> (Davidson, 1852) (Brachiopoda,Rhynchonelliformea)

The larval development of the Brachiopod Coptothyris grayi (Davidson, 1852) from the Sea of Japan is described for the first time. Ciliated blastula proved to represent the first free-swimming stage. The blastopore is initially formed as a rounded hole stretching later along the anteroposterior axis. The larva is first divided into two lobes (the apical lobe and the trunk); the mantle lobe is formed later as two lateral folds. Two pairs of seta bundles appear in the late stage larvae. The apical larval lobe in brachiopods is supposed to match the pre-oral lobe and anterior part of the trunk with tentacles in phoronids.     

Cinefilms of particle capture by an induced local change of beat of lateral cilia of a bryozoan

A local disruption of the metachronal wave always accompanies capture of algal cells by tentacles of Flustrellidra hispida (Fabricius). Beat changes for ≈0.2 s over ≈100μm of the ciliated band during capture of a 10-μm particle. The halted parcel of water is therefore larger than the particle of food but much smaller than the flow that continues past the tentacles elsewhere. These events are consistent with the hypothesis that an induced local reversal of beat concentrates particles for those suspension feeders that retain particles upstream from a band of simple cilia (adults or larvae of bryozoans, brachiopods, phoronids, hemichordates, and echinoderms). These events are not explained by other hypotheses that have been advanced for concentration of particles by these suspension feeders. Aerosol filtration models of direct interception are not applicable to this type of ciliary suspension feeder because retention depends on the magnitude of a stimulus and response to it. The stimulus will not be the same function of diameter of the food particle, and response is unlikely below a threshold stimulus.     

Ciliary feeding structures and particle capture mechanism in the freshwater bryozoan Plumatella repens (Phylactolaemata)

Abstract. In contrast to marine bryozoans, the lophophore structure and the ciliary filter‐feeding mechanism in freshwater bryozoans have so far been only poorly described. Specimens of the phylactolaemate bryozoan Plumatella repens were studied to clarify the tentacular ciliary structures and the particle capture mechanism. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the tentacles of the lophophore have a frontal band of densely packed cilia, and on each side a zigzag row of laterofrontal cilia and a band of lateral cilia. Phalloidin‐linked fluorescent dye showed no sign of muscular tissue within the tentacles. Video microscopy was used to describe basic characteristics of particle capture. Suspended particles in the incoming water flow, set up by the lateral ‘pump’ cilia on the tentacles, approach the tentacles with a velocity of 1–2 mm s^‐1. Near the tentacles, the particles are stopped by the stiff sensory laterofrontal cilia acting as a mechanical sieve, as previously seen in marine bryozoans. The particle capture mechanism suggested is based on the assumed ability of the sensory stiff laterofrontal cilia to be triggered by the deflection caused by the drag force of the through‐flowing water on a captured food particle. Thus, when a particle is stopped by the laterofrontal cilia, the otherwise stiff cilia are presumably triggered to make an inward flick which brings the restrained particle back into the downward directed main current, possibly to be captured again further down in the lophophore before being carried to the mouth via the food groove. No tentacle flicks and no transport of captured particles on the frontal side of the tentacles were observed. The velocity of the metachronal wave of the water‐pumping lateral cilia was measured to be ～0.2 mm s^‐1, the wavelength was ～7 μm, and hence the ciliary beat frequency estimated to be ～30 Hz (～20 °C). The filter feeding process in P. repens reported here resembles the ciliary sieving process described for marine bryozoans in recent years, although no tentacle flicks were observed in P. repens. The phylogenetic position of the phylactolaemates is discussed in the light of these findings.     

Morphology of gametes of mollusks, echinoderms, and brachiopods in systematics and phylogeny

The morphology of eggs and sperm of echinoderms, mollusks, and brachiopods was studied and compared. The gametes of inarticulate brachiopods (two classes Lingulata and Craniata and two subphyla Linguliformea and Craniaformea) are shown to have significant morphological differences from those of articulate brachiopods (extant class Rhynchonellata, subphylum Rhynchonelliformea). Inarticulate brachiopods have similar sperm morphology to that of primitive brachiopods, bivalves and some polychaetes that have external fertilization. Sperm morphology of articulate brachiopods is similar to that of echinoderms, which are considered to be typical deuterostomate invertebrates. This similarity supports an early deviation of lophophore-bearing animals from Bilateria, before this lineage branched into Protostomia and Deuterostomia. Similar gamete morphology in Lingulata and Craniata supports the view that inarticulate brachiopods should be retained as a supraclass taxon for comparison with other Lophotrochozoa, in particular with phoronids, bryozoans, and mollusks. Based on the new data on the gamete morphology in inarticulate brachiopods, we propose the name Lingulophyles with the type genus Lingula, and for articulate brachiopods Coptothyrophyles with the type genus Coptothyris.     

Functional disposition of the lophophore in living Brachiopoda

Emig, C. C. 1992 07 15: Functional disposition of the lophophore in living Brachiopoda.
The shape and disposition of adult brachiopod lophophores relate to in- and excurrent apertures. to the internal water irrigation system, to shell orientation at substratum and to near-bottom currents. The arrangement of the mantle canals and gonads of different lophophores are induccd by water circulation. The trocholophe (2% of living species) is considered as a plesiomorphic character which represents the basic plan of the lophophore, shared by all Lophophorata. Three different types of schizolophe (10%) are represented in terebratuloids, thecidioids and discinids. The spirolophe (19%), characteristic of rhynchonellides and most inarticulate brachiopods, except the schizolophe Pelagodiscus , has evolved divergently into specific arrangements of the mantle canals and gonads. The zygo-plectolophe (67%) is characteristic of most Terebratulida. The ptycholophe (2%) probably evolved independently in Megathlris and the thecidioids. The mesolophe, known in the fossil chonetdceans, is considered to be a primitive zygo-plectolophe. The median brachiopod sulcus increases the efficiency of the excurrent system and is considered as an evolved character but a homoplasy within the brachiopods. The characteristics of Recent lophophore types have to be taken into account when reconstructing the lophophore in fossil forms. Brachiopoda, Lophophorata, lophophore, water system, orientation, evolution .     

Versatile ciliary behaviour in capture of particles by the bryozoan cyphonautes larva

Cyphonautes larvae of a bryozoan, Membranipora membranacea, used several ciliary mechanisms to capture algal cells upstream from the lateral band of cilia that produces a feeding current. (1) Lateral cilia changed beat and a backcurrent occurred at the time and place that particles were retained. (2) Algal cells were sieved and held stationary at the upstream (frontal) side of a row of laterofrontal cilia that were not beating. (3) Localized extension of cilia toward the inhalant chamber, coincident with particle captures, indicated that laterofrontal cilia flick toward the inhalant chamber. These flicks may aid transport of captured particles toward the mouth. Thus my earlier report that larvae only sieve, in contrast to the adults (which have an active ciliary response) was in error. The similar ciliary bands in adult and larval bryozoans and in other lophophorates (brachiopods, and phoronids) suggest that these animals share a core repertoire of ciliary behaviours in the capture and concentration of suspended food particles.