Ring Finger Nuclear Factor RNF168 Is Important for Defects in Homologous Recombination Caused by Loss of the Breast Cancer Susceptibility Factor BRCA1

The RING finger nuclear factor RNF168 is required for recruitment of several DNA damage response factors to double strand breaks (DSBs), including 53BP1 and BRCA1. Because 53BP1 and BRCA1 function antagonistically during the DSB repair pathway homologous recombination (HR), the influence of RNF168 on HR has been unclear. We report that RNF168 depletion causes an elevated frequency of two distinct HR pathways (homology-directed repair and single strand annealing), suppresses defects in HR caused by BRCA1 silencing, but does not suppress HR defects caused by disruption of CtIP, RAD50, BRCA2, or RAD51. Furthermore, RNF168-depleted cells can form ionizing radiation-induced foci of the recombinase RAD51 without forming BRCA1 ionizing radiation-induced foci, indicating that this loss of BRCA1 recruitment to DSBs does not reflect a loss of function during HR. Additionally, we find that RNF168 and 53BP1 have a similar influence on HR. We suggest that RNF168 is important for HR defects caused by BRCA1 loss.     

SHLD2/FAM35A co‐operates with REV7 to coordinate DNA double‐strand break repair pathway choice

DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by two major pathways: non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). DNA repair pathway choice is governed by the opposing activities of 53BP1, in complex with its effectors RIF1 and REV7, and BRCA1. However, it remains unknown how the 53BP1/RIF1/REV7 complex stimulates NHEJ and restricts HR to the S/G2 phases of the cell cycle. Using a mass spectrometry (MS)‐based approach, we identify 11 high‐confidence REV7 interactors and elucidate the role of SHLD2 (previously annotated as FAM35A and RINN2) as an effector of REV7 in the NHEJ pathway. FAM35A depletion impairs NHEJ‐mediated DNA repair and compromises antibody diversification by class switch recombination (CSR) in B cells. FAM35A accumulates at DSBs in a 53BP1‐, RIF1‐, and REV7‐dependent manner and antagonizes HR by limiting DNA end resection. In fact, FAM35A is part of a larger complex composed of REV7 and SHLD1 (previously annotated as C20orf196 and RINN3), which promotes NHEJ and limits HR. Together, these results establish SHLD2 as a novel effector of REV7 in controlling the decision‐making process during DSB repair.     

The interplay between BRCA1 and 53BP1 influences death,aging, senescence and cancer

In proliferating cells DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are a common occurrence during DNA replication. DSB repair using homologous recombination is essential for the error-free repair of such breaks and proliferating cells require some level of HR activity for their viability. The BRCA1 tumour suppressor has an important role in this process and is believed to channel the DSBs into the HR pathway. The related 53BP1 gene is known to positively regulate repair of DSBs outside of S phase, but via the NHEJ pathway. Two new studies suggest a new role for 53BP1 as an inhibitor of HR [1], [2]. These genetic studies establish that 53BP1, but not other components of the NHEJ machinery, can inhibit the early resection step of HR. In cells defective for BRCA1, which is required for efficient HR, the balance between promoting and inhibiting HR is thrown towards inhibition. Simultaneous loss of 53BP1 can rescue the HR defect of BRCA1-defective cells and restore cellular viability. Here, I provide an overview of these studies and discuss their implications for tumourigenesis.     

An RNF168 fragment defective for focal accumulation at DNA damage is proficient for inhibition of homologous recombination in BRCA1 deficient cells

The E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF168 is a DNA damage response (DDR) factor that promotes monoubiquitination of H2A/H2AX at K13/15, facilitates recruitment of other DDR factors (e.g. 53BP1) to DNA damage, and inhibits homologous recombination (HR) in cells deficient in the tumor suppressor BRCA1. We have examined the domains of RNF168 important for these DDR events, including chromosomal HR that is induced by several nucleases (I-SceI, CAS9-WT and CAS9-D10A), since the inducing nuclease affects the relative frequency of distinct repair outcomes. We found that an N-terminal fragment of RNF168 (1-220/N221*) efficiently inhibits HR induced by each of these nucleases in BRCA1 depleted cells, and promotes recruitment of 53BP1 to DNA damage and H2AX monoubiquitination at K13/15. Each of these DDR events requires a charged residue in RNF168 (R57). Notably, RNF168-N221* fails to self-accumulate into ionizing radiation induced foci (IRIF). Furthermore, expression of RNF168 WT and N221* can significantly bypass the role of another E3 ubiquitin ligase, RNF8, for inhibition of HR in BRCA1 depleted cells, and for promotion of 53BP1 IRIF. We suggest that the ability for RNF168 to promote H2A/H2AX monoubiquitination and 53BP1 IRIF, but not RNF168 self-accumulation into IRIF, is important for inhibition of HR in BRCA1 deficient cells.     

The de-ubiquitylating enzymes USP26 and USP37 regulate homologous recombination by counteracting RAP80

The faithful repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is essential to safeguard genome stability. DSBs elicit a signaling cascade involving the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8/RNF168 and the ubiquitin-dependent assembly of the BRCA1-Abraxas-RAP80-MERIT40 complex. The association of BRCA1 with ubiquitin conjugates through RAP80 is known to be inhibitory to DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR). However, the precise regulation of this mechanism remains poorly understood. Through genetic screens we identified USP26 and USP37 as key de-ubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs) that limit the repressive impact of RNF8/RNF168 on HR. Both DUBs are recruited to DSBs where they actively remove RNF168-induced ubiquitin conjugates. Depletion of USP26 or USP37 disrupts the execution of HR and this effect is alleviated by the simultaneous depletion of RAP80. We demonstrate that USP26 and USP37 prevent excessive spreading of RAP80-BRCA1 from DSBs. On the other hand, we also found that USP26 and USP37 promote the efficient association of BRCA1 with PALB2. This suggests that these DUBs limit the ubiquitin-dependent sequestration of BRCA1 via the BRCA1-Abraxas-RAP80-MERIT40 complex, while promoting complex formation and cooperation of BRCA1 with PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 during HR. These findings reveal a novel ubiquitin-dependent mechanism that regulates distinct BRCA1-containing complexes for efficient repair of DSBs by HR.     

USP14 regulates DNA damage repair by targeting RNF168-dependent ubiquitination

Recent reports have made important revelations, uncovering direct regulation of DNA damage response (DDR)-associated proteins and chromatin ubiquitination (Ubn) by macroautophagy/autophagy. Here, we report a previously unexplored connection between autophagy and DDR, via a deubiquitnase (DUB), USP14. Loss of autophagy in prostate cancer cells led to unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as indicated by persistent ionizing radiation (IR)-induced foci (IRIF) formation for γH2AFX, and decreased protein levels and IRIF formation for RNF168, an E3-ubiquitin ligase essential for chromatin Ubn and recruitment of critical DDR effector proteins in response to DSBs, including TP53BP1. Consistently, RNF168-associated Ubn signaling and TP53BP1 IRIF formation were reduced in autophagy-deficient cells. An activity assay identified several DUBs, including USP14, which showed higher activity in autophagy-deficient cells. Importantly, inhibiting USP14 could overcome DDR defects in autophagy-deficient cells. USP14 IRIF formation and protein stability were increased in autophagy-deficient cells. Co-immunoprecipitation and colocalization of USP14 with MAP1LC3B and the UBA-domain of SQSTM1 identified USP14 as a substrate of autophagy and SQSTM1. Additionally, USP14 directly interacted with RNF168, which depended on the MIU1 domain of RNF168. These findings identify USP14 as a novel substrate of autophagy and regulation of RNF168-dependent Ubn and TP53BP1 recruitment by USP14 as a critical link between DDR and autophagy. Given the role of Ubn signaling in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), the major pathway for repair of IR-induced DNA damage, these findings provide unique insights into the link between autophagy, DDR-associated Ubn signaling and NHEJ DNA repair.

Abbreviations: ATG7: autophagy related 7; CQ: chloroquine; DDR: DNA damage response; DUB: deubiquitinase; HR: homologous recombination; IR: ionizing radiation; IRIF: ionizing radiation-induced foci; LAMP2: lysosomal associated membrane protein 2; MAP1LC3B/LC3B: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 beta; MIU1: motif interacting with ubiquitin; NHEJ: non homologous end-joining; PCa: prostate cancer; TP53BP1/53BP1: tumor protein p53 binding protein 1; RNF168: ring finger protein 168; SQSTM1/p62 sequestosome 1; γH2AFX/γH2AX: H2A histone family member X: phosphorylated, UBA: ubiquitin-associated; Ub: ubiquitin; Ubn: ubiquitination; USP14: ubiquitin specific peptidase 14.     

DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination

The induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA by exposure to DNA damaging agents, or as intermediates in normal cellular processes, constitutes a severe threat for the integrity of the genome. If not properly repaired, DSBs may result in chromosomal aberrations, which, in turn, can lead to cell death or to uncontrolled cell growth. To maintain the integrity of the genome, multiple pathways for the repair of DSBs have evolved during evolution: homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA). HR has the potential to lead to accurate repair of DSBs, whereas NHEJ and SSA are essentially mutagenic. In yeast, DSBs are primarily repaired via high-fidelity repair of DSBs mediated by HR, whereas in higher eukaryotes, both HR and NHEJ are important. In this review, we focus on the functional conservation of HR from fungi to mammals and on the role of the individual proteins in this process.     

Repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks by precise ligation in human cells

Double-strand breaks (DSBs), a common type of DNA lesion, occur daily in human cells as a result of both endogenous and exogenous damaging agents. DSBs are repaired in two general ways: by the homology-dependent, error-free pathways of homologous recombination (HR) and by the homology-independent, error-prone pathways of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), with NHEJ predominating in most cells. DSBs with compatible ends can be re-joined in vitro with DNA ligase alone, which raises the question of whether such DSBs require the more elaborate machinery of NHEJ to be repaired in cells. Here we report that chromosomal DSBs with compatible ends introduced by the rare-cutting endonuclease, ISceI, are repaired by precise ligation nearly 100% of the time in human cells. Precise ligation depends on the classical NHEJ components Ku70, XRCC4, and DNA ligase IV, since siRNA knockdowns of these factors significantly reduced the efficiency of precise ligation. Interestingly, knockdown of the tumor suppressors p53 or BRCA1 showed similar effects as the knockdowns of NHEJ factors. In contrast, knockdown of components involved in alternative NHEJ, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, and single-strand break repair did not reduce precise ligation. In summary, our results demonstrate that DSBs in human cells are efficiently repaired by precise ligation, which requires classical NHEJ components and is enhanced by p53 and BRCA1.     

BRCA1 modulates the autophosphorylation status of DNA-PKcs in S phase of the cell cycle

Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) are the two prominent pathways responsible for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). NHEJ is not restricted to a cell-cycle stage, whereas HR is active primarily in the S/G2 phases suggesting there are cell cycle-specific mechanisms that play a role in the choice between NHEJ and HR. Here we show NHEJ is attenuated in S phase via modulation of the autophosphorylation status of the NHEJ factor DNA-PKcs at serine 2056 by the pro-HR factor BRCA1. BRCA1 interacts with DNA-PKcs in a cell cycle-regulated manner and this interaction is mediated by the tandem BRCT domain of BRCA1, but surprisingly in a phospho-independent manner. BRCA1 attenuates DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation via directly blocking the ability of DNA-PKcs to autophosphorylate. Subsequently, blocking autophosphorylation of DNA-PKcs at the serine 2056 phosphorylation cluster promotes HR-required DNA end processing and loading of HR factors to DSBs and is a possible mechanism by which BRCA1 promotes HR.     

Human RNF169 is a negative regulator of the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks

Nonproteolytic ubiquitylation of chromatin surrounding deoxyribonucleic acid double-strand breaks (DSBs), mediated by the RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligases, plays a key role in recruiting repair factors, including 53BP1 and BRCA1, to reestablish genome integrity. In this paper, we show that human RNF169, an uncharacterized E3 ubiquitin ligase paralogous to RNF168, accumulated in DSB repair foci through recognition of RNF168-catalyzed ubiquitylation products by its motif interacting with ubiquitin domain. Unexpectedly, RNF169 was dispensable for chromatin ubiquitylation and ubiquitin-dependent accumulation of repair factors at DSB sites. Instead, RNF169 functionally competed with 53BP1 and RAP80-BRCA1 for association with RNF168-modified chromatin independent of its catalytic activity, limiting the magnitude of their recruitment to DSB sites. By delaying accumulation of 53BP1 and RAP80 at damaged chromatin, RNF169 stimulated homologous recombination and restrained nonhomologous end joining, affecting cell survival after DSB infliction. Our results show that RNF169 functions in a noncanonical fashion to harness RNF168-mediated protein recruitment to DSB-containing chromatin, thereby contributing to regulation of DSB repair pathway utilization.     

RIF1: A novel regulatory factor for DNA replication and DNA damage response signaling

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are highly toxic to the cells and accumulation of DSBs results in several detrimental effects in various cellular processes which can lead to neurological, immunological and developmental disorders. Failure of the repair of DSBs spurs mutagenesis and is a driver of tumorigenesis, thus underscoring the importance of the accurate repair of DSBs. Two major canonical DSB repair pathways are the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) pathways. 53BP1 and BRCA1 are the key mediator proteins which coordinate with other components of the DNA repair machinery in the NHEJ and HR pathways respectively, and their exclusive recruitment to DNA breaks/ends potentially decides the choice of repair by either NHEJ or HR. Recently, Rap1 interacting factor 1 has been identified as an important component of the DNA repair pathway which acts downstream of the ATM/53BP1 to inhibit the 5′–3′ end resection of broken DNA ends, in-turn facilitating NHEJ repair and inhibiting homology directed repair. Rif1 is conserved from yeast to humans but its function has evolved from telomere length regulation in yeast to the maintenance of genome integrity in mammalian cells. Recently its role in the maintenance of genomic integrity has been expanded to include the regulation of chromatin structure, replication timing and intra-S phase checkpoint. We present a summary of these important findings highlighting the various aspects of Rif1 functions and discuss the key implications for genomic integrity.     

Ubiquitin-H2AX fusions render 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites independent of RNF8 or RNF168

The mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168 facilitate recruitment of the DNA damage response protein 53BP1 to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The mechanism involves recruitment of RNF8, followed by recruitment of RNF168, which ubiquitinates histones H2A/H2AX on K15. 53BP1 then binds to nucleosomes at sites of DNA DSBs by recognizing, in addition to methyl marks, histone H2A/H2AX ubiquitinated on K15. We report here that expressing H2AX fusion proteins with N-terminal bulky moieties can rescue 53BP1 recruitment to sites of DNA DSBs in cells lacking RNF8 or RNF168 or in cells treated with proteasome inhibitors, in which histone ubiquitination at sites of DNA DSBs is compromised. The rescue required S139 at the C-terminus of the H2AX fusion protein and was occasionally accompanied by partial rescue of ubiquitination at sites of DNA DSBs. We conclude that recruitment of 53BP1 to sites of DNA DSBs is possible in the absence of RNF8 or RNF168, but still dependent on chromatin ubiquitination.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signalling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signalling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G1. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.     

Give me a break,but not in mitosis: The mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double strand breaks with early signaling events

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are extremely cytotoxic lesions with a single unrepaired DSB being sufficient to induce cell death. A complex signaling cascade, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), is in place to deal with such DNA lesions and maintain genome stability. Recent work by us and others has found that the signaling cascade activated by DSBs in mitosis is truncated, displaying apical, but not downstream, components of the DDR. The E3 Ubiquitin ligases RNF8, RNF168 and BRCA1, along with the DDR mediator 53BP1, are not recruited to DSB sites in mitosis, and activation of downstream checkpoint kinases is also impaired. Here, we show that RNF8 and RNF168 are recruited to DNA damage foci in late mitosis, presumably to prime sites for 53BP1 recruitment in early G₁. Interestingly, we show that, although RNF8, RNF168 and 53BP1 are excluded from DSB sites during most of mitosis, they associate with mitotic structures such as the kinetochore, suggesting roles for these DDR factors during mitotic cell division. We discuss these and other recent findings and suggest how these novel data collectively contribute to our understanding of mitosis and how cells deal with DNA damage during this crucial cell cycle stage.Key words: mitosis, DNA damage response, DNA double-strand breaks, signaling cascade, chromatin     

Opposing roles for 53BP1 during homologous recombination

Although DNA non-homologous end-joining repairs most DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in G2 phase, late repairing DSBs undergo resection and repair by homologous recombination (HR). Based on parallels to the situation in G1 cells, previous work has suggested that DSBs that undergo repair by HR predominantly localize to regions of heterochromatin (HC). By using H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 to identify HC regions, we substantiate and extend previous evidence, suggesting that HC-DSBs undergo repair by HR. Next, we examine roles for 53BP1 and BRCA1 in this process. Previous studies have shown that 53BP1 is pro-non-homologous end-joining and anti-HR. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that in G2 phase, 53BP1 is required for HR at HC-DSBs with its role being to promote phosphorylated KAP-1 foci formation. BRCA1, in contrast, is dispensable for pKAP-1 foci formation but relieves the barrier caused by 53BP1. As 53BP1 is retained at irradiation-induced foci during HR, we propose that BRCA1 promotes displacement but retention of 53BP1 to allow resection and any necessary HC modifications to complete HR. In contrast to this role for 53BP1 in HR in G2 phase, we show that it is dispensable for HR in S phase, where HC regions are likely relaxed during replication.     

H4K20me2 distinguishes pre-replicative from post-replicative chromatin to appropriately direct DNA repair pathway choice by 53BP1-RIF1-MAD2L2

The main pathways for the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination directed repair (HDR). These operate mutually exclusive and are activated by 53BP1 and BRCA1, respectively. As HDR can only succeed in the presence of an intact copy of replicated DNA, cells employ several mechanisms to inactivate HDR in the G1 phase of cell cycle. As cells enter S-phase, these inhibitory mechanisms are released and HDR becomes active. However, during DNA replication, NHEJ and HDR pathways are both functional and non-replicated and replicated DNA regions co-exist, with the risk of aberrant HDR activity at DSBs in non-replicated DNA. It has become clear that DNA repair pathway choice depends on inhibition of DNA end-resection by 53BP1 and its downstream factors RIF1 and MAD2L2. However, it is unknown how MAD2L2 accumulates at DSBs to participate in DNA repair pathway control and how the NHEJ and HDR repair pathways are appropriately activated at DSBs with respect to the replication status of the DNA, such that NHEJ acts at DSBs in pre-replicative DNA and HDR acts on DSBs in post-replicative DNA. Here we show that MAD2L2 is recruited to DSBs in H4K20 dimethylated chromatin by forming a protein complex with 53BP1 and RIF1 and that MAD2L2, similar to 53BP1 and RIF1, suppresses DSB accumulation of BRCA1. Furthermore, we show that the replication status of the DNA locally ensures the engagement of the correct DNA repair pathway, through epigenetics. In non-replicated DNA, saturating levels of the 53BP1 binding site, di-methylated lysine 20 of histone 4 (H4K20me2), lead to robust 53BP1-RIF1-MAD2L2 recruitment at DSBs, with consequent exclusion of BRCA1. Conversely, replication-associated 2-fold dilution of H4K20me2 promotes the release of the 53BP1-RIF1-MAD2L2 complex and favours the access of BRCA1. Thus, the differential H4K20 methylation status between pre-replicative and post-replicative DNA represents an intrinsic mechanism that locally ensures appropriate recruitment of the 53BP1-RIF1-MAD2L2 complex at DNA DSBs, to engage the correct DNA repair pathway.     

The anaphase promoting complex promotes NHEJ repair through stabilizing Ku80 at DNA damage sites

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired through two major pathways, homology-directed recombination (HDR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The choice between these two pathways is largely influenced by cell cycle phases. HDR can occur only in S/G2 when sister chromatid can provide homologous templates, whereas NHEJ can take place in all phases of the cell cycle except mitosis. Central to NHEJ repair is the Ku70/80 heterodimer which forms a ring structure that binds DSB ends and serves as a platform to recruit factors involved in NHEJ. Upon completion of NHEJ repair, DNA double strand-encircling Ku dimers have to be removed. The removal depends on ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation of Ku80 by the ubiquitin E3 ligases RNF8. Here we report that RNF8 is a substrate of APC^Cdh1 and the latter keeps RNF8 level in check at DSBs to prevent premature turnover of Ku80.     

DNA repair pathway choice—a PTIP of the hat to 53BP1

In the June issue of Cell, Nussenzweig and colleagues identify PTIP/PAXIP as a 53BP1 effector protein in the regulatory network that controls DSB repair pathway choice.Cell (2013) 153 6, 1266–1280 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.023DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are highly cytotoxic lesions that can induce genome rearrangements if not accurately repaired. DSBs can be repaired either through homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR is the preferred repair pathway during the S and G2 cell cycle phases because a sister chromatid provides a perfect template for ‘error-free'' repair. During G1, when HR is suppressed to prevent recombination with homologues, repair is achieved primarily by NHEJ. Molecularly, DSB repair pathway choice is largely regulated at the level of 5′ to 3′ DNA end resection, that is, the formation of the 3′ end single-stranded DNA overhangs that are used to initiate HR. End resection inhibits NHEJ and promotes HR.In the June issue of Cell, Nussenzweig and colleagues identified the protein PTIP (also known as PAXIP) as a new component of the regulatory network that controls DSB repair pathway choice [1]. This work has important implications for our understanding of the mechanisms by which genomic integrity is underpinned, and is especially germane to those interested in the genesis of breast and ovarian cancer caused by a defective BRCA1 protein, which is crucial for DSB repair by HR.53BP1 (also known as TP53BP1) is a key determinant of DSB repair pathway choice [2]. In response to DSBs, 53BP1 binds to chromatin at damaged sites, where it promotes NHEJ by blocking end resection. 53BP1 has a crucial role during class switch recombination (CSR) in B cells and the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres. An even more striking phenotype was observed in mice in which loss of 53BP1 reversed most of the phenotypes associated with BRCA1 deficiency, including cell and embryonic lethality as well as tumorigenesis [2]. These findings suggest that 53BP1 and BRCA1 battle each other to influence DSB repair pathway choice.Molecularly, 53BP1 is responsible for the defective HR seen in BRCA1-deficient cells. Furthermore, in those cells, 53BP1 promotes the formation of characteristic radial chromosomes that are caused by toxic NHEJ events, presumably during S phase. Understanding exactly how 53BP1 carries out its many functions has been a major challenge to the field as 53BP1 does not harbour any enzymatic activity. However, it has been shown that 53BP1 must accumulate on chromatin to be functional. In addition, a mutant 53BP1 allele in which all 28 ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) phosphorylation sites were changed to alanine (53BP1^28A) failed to rescue 53BP1 deficiency, suggesting that 53BP1 acts through phosphorylation-dependent protein interactions to promote NHEJ [2].RIF1 was identified as the first effector of 53BP1 in DSB repair [3,4,5,6,7]. RIF1 accumulates at DSB sites by binding to phosphorylated 53BP1 but, intriguingly, the loss of RIF1 has a milder effect than the loss of 53BP1 with respect to the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres [3], and RIF1 deficiency does not fully restore HR in BRCA1-deficient cells [7]. As the 53BP1^28A mutant is nearly as defective as the complete loss of 53BP1 for these activities, these observations indicate that additional 53BP1 effector proteins contribute to some of the 53BP1 functions.Nussenzweig and colleagues provide compelling evidence that the BRCT domain-containing protein PTIP is the missing 53BP1 effector protein [1]. The authors identified a separation-of-function mutation in 53BP1 that disrupted the first eight amino-terminal ATM sites (53BP1^8A). The 53BP1^8A mutant behaved the same as the wild-type protein with respect to CSR—a physiological process dependent on NHEJ—but failed to promote genome instability (radial chromosome formation) in BRCA1-deficient cells after treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Since RIF1-deficient cells have impaired CSR and RIF1 can localize to break sites in cells expressing the 53BP1^8A mutant, this suggests that a protein other than RIF1 binds to the N-terminal region of 53BP1 to inhibit HR.The newly identified 53BP1 effector protein PTIP is a multifunctional DNA repair factor that interacts with phosphorylated Ser 25 of 53BP1 through its tandem BRCT domains [8]—a site that was mutated in the 53BP1^8A allele. PTIP is also part of the MLL3/MLL4 histone H3 Lys 4 methyltransferase complexes but this function seems to be unrelated to its role as a 53BP1 co-factor.Nussenzweig and co-workers found that PTIP-deficient cells are sensitive to ionizing radiation but tolerant of DNA damaging agents that are toxic to HR-deficient cells, which suggests a role for PTIP in NHEJ. In agreement with this, the fusion frequency of uncapped telomeres was reduced in PTIP-deficient cells. Interestingly, as in the case of the 53BP1^8A allele, PTIP-deficient B cells were proficient in switching their immunoglobulin locus, although this switching event is impaired in RIF1^−/− B cells. This suggests that PTIP might participate selectively in pathological NHEJ.Nussenzweig and colleagues next generated a conditional BRCA1^−/− PTIP^−/− mouse to investigate the contribution of PTIP to the genome instability of BRCA1-deficient B cells. Loss of PTIP restored normal growth kinetics and genome stability to BRCA1-deficient cells treated with a PARP inhibitor. In addition, RAD51 IR-induced focus formation was restored in BRCA1^−/− PTIP^−/− cells. As the primary defect of BRCA1-deficient cells with respect to HR seems to be at the level of resection, the accumulation of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA into IR-induced foci was then analysed. The finding that PTIP-deficient cells have an increased number of RPA foci per cell supports a role for PTIP in blocking resection. Together, this suggests that PTIP opposes DNA end resection and mutagenic DSB repair in BRCA1-deficient cells.These results were surprising as they revealed that the 53BP1 activities relating to physiological NHEJ (during CSR) and mutagenic NHEJ (after PARP inhibition) can be separated, and that they are carried out by two distinct proteins that ‘read'' ATM-dependent 53BP1 phosphorylation. The relationship between 53BP1, RIF1 and PTIP is probably complex, as suggested by the possible competition between RIF1 and PTIP, and the observation that both proteins contribute in an additive manner to the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres, downstream from 53BP1.According to these findings, multiple phosphorylation events in 53BP1 seem to integrate ATM activity to control distinct aspects of DSB repair pathway choice (Fig 1). Establishing exactly how an increase of ATM activity at break sites is translated into the coordination of 53BP1 phosphorylation, with RIF1 and PTIP binding, will be an important milestone towards understanding 53BP1 function. Indeed, multi-site phosphorylation and its recognition by binding proteins can be used to develop switch-like responses that might be important for organizing the chromatin at DSB sites.Open in a separate windowFigure 153BP1 phospho-dependent interactions involved in DSB repair. PTIP and RIF1 interact with chromatin-bound and ATM-phosphorylated 53BP1 at DSB sites. PTIP binds directly to 53BP1 phosphorylated on Ser 14;25 (within the first eight Ser/Thr-Q sites). RIF1 binds to phosphorylated 53BP1 either directly or through an intermediate factor (X). The carboxy-terminal seven Ser/Thr-Q sites (9–15 Ser/Thr-Q sites) are involved in the interaction of RIF1–53BP1, although the amino-terminal eight Ser/Thr-Q sites might stabilize the binding. It is unknown whether PTIP and RIF1 can associate simultaneously with 53BP1 (left side of the figure), or if the binding is exclusive, due to either differential phosphorylation of the Ser/Thr-Q sites or steric hindrance (right side of the figure). 53BP1, PTIP and RIF1 block DNA end-resection and promote NHEJ repair. Although both PTIP and RIF1 contribute to dysfunctional telomere fusions, they also have distinct functions downstream from 53BP1. While RIF1 is essential for CSR and has a milder effect on toxic NHEJ events, PTIP is dispensable for CSR and has a more prominent role in toxic NHEJ events that lead to genome instability in BRCA1-deficient cells. ATM, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated; CSR, class switch recombination; DSB, double-stranded break; NHEJ, non-homologous end-joining.The identification of PTIP as a new 53BP1 effector also deepens the mystery of DSB repair pathway choice regulation by 53BP1. Future studies are needed to elucidate how 53BP1 and its effector proteins block resection. Are PTIP and RIF1 blocking specific nucleases? Do they act in a temporally distinct fashion or are they distributed in distinct subdomains of the chromatin flanking DSB sites? What is the function of PTIP in relation to the cell cycle? Testing whether RIF1 binds directly to 53BP1, and if so to which phosphorylated site, might answer some of the above questions. The identification of a RIF1 mutation that selectively disrupts 53BP1 binding would enable surgical manipulation of the 53BP1–RIF1–PTIP circuit at DSB sites.Another unresolved issue is whether 53BP1 acts solely by recruiting RIF1 and PTIP, or whether 53BP1 has a more active role in blocking resection. We have shown that 53BP1 localizes to the chromatin flanking the DSBs by binding to methylated and ubiquitinated nucleosomes, in a wheel clamp-like manner [9]. This suggests that 53BP1 might modify the nucleosomal array structure in a way that makes it refractory to the resection machinery. Recognizing how nucleosomes modified by 53BP1 cooperate with RIF1 and PTIP might provide clues to the role of these two proteins in end protection.It is important to note that in human cells, PTIP might not be recruited to DSB sites in a 53BP1- and ATM-dependent manner [8]. Furthermore, in the avian B-cell line DT40, PTIP promotes HR instead of inhibiting it [10]. It will be important to revisit these studies to tease out whether these differences are due to context-, experiment- or species-specific effects.The identification of PTIP as a candidate genetic modifier of BRCA1-deficient tumours is an important finding. As noted by the authors, disabling the PTIP–53BP1 interaction pharmacologically might selectively restore HR in BRCA1-deficient cells, which might be useful in certain contexts, for example as a chemopreventive strategy.