Translational regulation of the L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli: mutations that define the target site for repression by L1.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. The mRNA target site for this repression is located close to the Shine-Dalgarno sequence for the first cistron, rp1K (L11). By use of a random mutagenesis procedure we have isolated and characterized a series of point mutations in the L11 leader mRNA which eliminate or greatly diminish the regulation by L1. The mutations define a region essential for translational regulation upstream of the L11 Shine-Dalgarno sequence and identify a region of structural homology with the L1 binding site on 23S rRNA. These results are also consistent with the previously proposed model for the secondary structure of the L11 leader mRNA.     

Feedback regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis in E. coli: Localization of the mRNA target sites for repressor action of ribosomal protein L1

E. coli ribosomal protein L1 is a translational repressor of the synthesis in vitro of both proteins encoded in the L11 operon (L11 and L1). L1 is shown to act at a single target site within the first 160 bases of the bicistronic mRNA, near (or at) the translation initiation site of the L11 cistron. Synthesis of L1 apparently requires translation of the preceding L11 cistron, allowing regulation of the synthesis of both proteins from a single mRNA target site. This observation suggests a sequential translation mechanism that results in the equimolar synthesis rates of the two proteins observed in vivo. It was found that the presence of 23S rRNA, but not 16S rRNA, relieves translational inhibition by L1. L1 presumably recognizes structural features of the mRNA target site that are homologous to the L1-binding site of 23S rRNA. Although previous work indicated that translationally inhibited ribosomal protein mRNA is degraded in vivo, L1 repressor action in the present in vitro system was found not to involve mRNA degradation.     

Autogenous translational regulation of the ribosomal MvaL1 operon in the archaebacterium Methanococcus vannielii.

The mechanisms for regulation of ribosomal gene expression have been characterized in eukaryotes and eubacteria, but not yet in archaebacteria. We have studied the regulation of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins MvaL1, MvaL10, and MvaL12, encoded by the MvaL1 operon of Methanococcus vannielii, a methanogenic archaebacterium. MvaL1, the homolog of the regulatory protein L1 encoded by the L11 operon of Escherichia coli, was shown to be an autoregulator of the MvaL1 operon. As in E. coli, regulation takes place at the level of translation. The target site for repression by MvaL1 was localized by site-directed mutagenesis to a region within the coding sequence of the MvaL1 gene commencing about 30 bases downstream of the ATG initiation codon. The MvaL1 binding site on the mRNA exhibits similarity in both primary sequence and secondary structure to the L1 regulatory target site of E. coli and to the putative binding site for MvaL1 on the 23S rRNA. In contrast to other regulatory systems, the putative MvaL1 binding site is located in a sequence of the mRNA which is not in direct contact with the ribosome as part of the initiation complex. Furthermore, the untranslated leader sequence is not involved in the regulation. Therefore, we suggest that a novel mechanism of translational feedback regulation exists in M. vannielii.     

The structure of a ribosomal protein S8/spc operon mRNA complex

In bacteria, translation of all the ribosomal protein cistrons in the spc operon mRNA is repressed by the binding of the product of one of them, S8, to an internal sequence at the 5' end of the L5 cistron. The way in which the first two genes of the spc operon are regulated, retroregulation, is mechanistically distinct from translational repression by S8 of the genes from L5 onward. A 2.8 A resolution crystal structure has been obtained of Escherichia coli S8 bound to this site. Despite sequence differences, the structure of this complex is almost identical to that of the S8/helix 21 complex seen in the small ribosomal subunit, consistent with the hypothesis that autogenous regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis results from conformational similarities between mRNAs and rRNAs. S8 binding must repress the translation of its own mRNA by inhibiting the formation of a ribosomal initiation complex at the start of the L5 cistron.     

Stability of ribosomal protein mRNA and translational feedback regulation in Escherichia coli

Summary It was previously observed that the stability of ribosomal protein (r-protein) mRNA in Escherichia coli decreases under the conditions where its translation is feedback inhibited by repressor r-protein. We have now demonstrated that the stability of mRNA for r-proteins S13, S11 and S4 increases in a strain carrying a mutation in the gene for S4, a translational repressor regulating these r-proteins. The results confirm the previous observations that translational repression increases the decay rate of r-protein mRNA, and in addition, show that the half-life of S13-S4 r-protein mRNA in cells growing under ordinary conditions is significantly shorter than its inherent stability would predict, due to the operation of translational feedback regulation.     

Mutational analysis of the L1 binding site of 23S rRNA in Escherichia coli.

The L11 ribosomal protein operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for L11 and L1 and is feedback regulated by the translational repressor L1. Both the L1 binding site on 23S rRNA and the L1 repressor target site on L11 operon mRNA share similar proposed secondary structures and contain some primary sequence identity. Several site-directed mutations in the binding region of 23S rRNA were constructed and their effects on binding were examined. For in vitro analysis, a filter binding method was used. For in vivo analysis, a conditional expression system was used to overproduce a 23S rRNA fragment containing the L1 binding region, which leads to specific derepression of the synthesis of L11 and L1. Changes in the shared region of the 23S rRNA L1 binding site produced effects on L1 binding similar to those found previously in analysis of corresponding changes in the L11 operon mRNA target site. The results support the hypothesis that r-protein L1 interacts with both 23S rRNA and L11 operon mRNA by recognizing similar features on both RNAs.     

Translational repression of the Escherichia coli alpha operon mRNA: importance of an mRNA conformational switch and a ternary entrapment complex

Ribosomal protein S4 represses synthesis of the four ribosomal proteins (including itself) in the Escherichia coli alpha operon by binding to a nested pseudoknot structure that spans the ribosome binding site. A model for the repression mechanism previously proposed two unusual features: (i) the mRNA switches between conformations that are "active" or "inactive" in translation, with S4 as an allosteric effector of the inactive form, and (ii) S4 holds the 30 S subunit in an unproductive complex on the mRNA ("entrapment"), in contrast to direct competition between repressor and ribosome binding ("displacement"). These two key points have been experimentally tested. First, it is found that the mRNA pseudoknot exists in an equilibrium between two conformers with different electrophoretic mobilities. S4 selectively binds to one form of the RNA, as predicted for an allosteric effector; binding of ribosomal 30 S subunits is nearly equal in the two forms. Second, we have used S4 labeled at a unique cysteine with either of two fluorophores to characterize its interactions with mRNA and 30 S subunits. Equilibrium experiments detect the formation of a specific ternary complex of S4, mRNA pseudoknot, and 30 S subunits. The existence of this ternary complex is unambiguous evidence for translational repression of the alpha operon by an entrapment mechanism.     

A competition mechanism regulates the translation of the Escherichia coli operon encoding ribosomal proteins L35 and L20

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein (r-protein) L20 is essential for the assembly of the 50S ribosomal subunit and is also a translational regulator of its own rpmI-rplT operon, encoding r-proteins L35 and L20 in that order. L20 directly represses the translation of the first cistron and, through translational coupling, that of its own gene. The translational operator of the operon is 450 nt in length and includes a long-range pseudoknot interaction between two RNA sequences separated by 280 nt. L20 has the potential to bind both to this pseudoknot and to an irregular hairpin, although only one site is occupied at a time during regulation. This work shows that the rpmI-rplT operon is regulated by competition between L20 and the ribosome for binding to mRNA in vitro and in vivo. Detailed studies on the regulatory mechanisms of r-protein synthesis have only been performed on the rpsO gene, regulated by r-protein S15, and on the alpha operon, regulated by S4. Both are thought to be controlled by a trapping mechanism, whereby the 30S ribosomal subunit, the mRNA, and the initiator tRNA are blocked as a nonfunctional preternary complex. This alternative mode of regulation of the rpmI-rplT operon raises the possibility that control is kinetically and not thermodynamically limited in this case. We show that the pseudoknot, which is known to be essential for L20 binding and regulation, also enhances 30S binding to mRNA as if this structure is specifically recognised by the ribosome.     

MvaL1 autoregulates the synthesis of the three ribosomal proteins encoded on the MvaL1 operon of the archaeon Methanococcus vannielii by inhibiting its own translation before or at the formation of the first peptide bond

The control of ribosomal protein synthesis has been investigated extensively in Eukarya and Bacteria. In Archaea, only the regulation of the MvaL1 operon (encoding ribosomal proteins MvaL1, MvaL10 and MvaL12) of Methanococcus vannielii has been studied in some detail. As in Escherichia coli , regulation takes place at the level of translation. MvaL1, the homologue of the regulatory protein L1 encoded by the L11 operon of E . coli , was shown to be an autoregulator of the MvaL1 operon. The regulatory MvaL1 binding site on the mRNA is located about 30 nucleotides downstream of the ATG start codon, a sequence that is not in direct contact with the initiating ribosome. Here, we demonstrate that autoregulation of MvaL1 occurs at or before the formation of the first peptide bond of MvaL1. Specific interaction of purified MvaL1 with both 23S RNA and its own mRNA is confirmed by filter binding studies. In vivo expression experiments reveal that translation of the distal MvaL10 and MvaL12 cistrons is coupled to that of the MvaL1 cistron. A mRNA secondary structure resembling a canonical L10 binding site and preliminary in vitro regulation experiments had suggested a co-regulatory function of MvaL10, the homologue of the regulatory protein L10 of the β-operon of E . coli . However, we show that MvaL10 does not have a regulatory function.     

Evidence for allosteric coupling between the ribosome and repressor binding sites of a translationally regulated mRNA

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S4 is a translational repressor regulating the expression of four ribosomal genes in the alpha operon. In vitro studies have shown that the protein specifically recognizes an unusual mRNA pseudoknot secondary structure which links sequences upstream and downstream of the ribosome binding site for rpsM (S13) [Tang, C. K., & Draper, D. E. (1989) Cell 57, 531]. We have prepared fusions of the rpsM translational initiation site and lacZ that allows us to detect repression in cells in which overproduction of S4 repressor can be induced. Twenty-five mRNA sequence variants have been introduced into the S13-lacZ fusions and the levels of translational repression measured. Sets of compensating base changes confirm the importance of the pseudoknot secondary structure for translational repression. An A residue in a looped, single-stranded sequence is also required for S4 recognition and may contact S4 directly. Comparison of translational repression levels and S4 binding constants for the set of mRNA mutations show that nine mutants are repressed much more weakly than predicted from their affinity for S4; in extreme cases no repression can be detected for variants with unchanged S4 binding. We suggest that the mRNA contains functionally distinct ribosome and repressor binding sites that are allosterically coupled. Mutations can relieve translational repression by disrupting the linkage between the two sites without altering S4 binding. This proposal assigns to the mRNA a more active role in mediating translational repression than found in other translational repression systems.