Analysis of a Gibbs sampler method for model-based clustering of gene expression data

MOTIVATION: Over the last decade, a large variety of clustering algorithms have been developed to detect coregulatory relationships among genes from microarray gene expression data. Model-based clustering approaches have emerged as statistically well-grounded methods, but the properties of these algorithms when applied to large-scale data sets are not always well understood. An in-depth analysis can reveal important insights about the performance of the algorithm, the expected quality of the output clusters, and the possibilities for extracting more relevant information out of a particular data set. RESULTS: We have extended an existing algorithm for model-based clustering of genes to simultaneously cluster genes and conditions, and used three large compendia of gene expression data for Saccharomyces cerevisiae to analyze its properties. The algorithm uses a Bayesian approach and a Gibbs sampling procedure to iteratively update the cluster assignment of each gene and condition. For large-scale data sets, the posterior distribution is strongly peaked on a limited number of equiprobable clusterings. A GO annotation analysis shows that these local maxima are all biologically equally significant, and that simultaneously clustering genes and conditions performs better than only clustering genes and assuming independent conditions. A collection of distinct equivalent clusterings can be summarized as a weighted graph on the set of genes, from which we extract fuzzy, overlapping clusters using a graph spectral method. The cores of these fuzzy clusters contain tight sets of strongly coexpressed genes, while the overlaps exhibit relations between genes showing only partial coexpression. AVAILABILITY: GaneSh, a Java package for coclustering, is available under the terms of the GNU General Public License from our website at http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/software     

Adaptive quality-based clustering of gene expression profiles

MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments generate a considerable amount of data, which analyzed properly help us gain a huge amount of biologically relevant information about the global cellular behaviour. Clustering (grouping genes with similar expression profiles) is one of the first steps in data analysis of high-throughput expression measurements. A number of clustering algorithms have proved useful to make sense of such data. These classical algorithms, though useful, suffer from several drawbacks (e.g. they require the predefinition of arbitrary parameters like the number of clusters; they force every gene into a cluster despite a low correlation with other cluster members). In the following we describe a novel adaptive quality-based clustering algorithm that tackles some of these drawbacks. RESULTS: We propose a heuristic iterative two-step algorithm: First, we find in the high-dimensional representation of the data a sphere where the "density" of expression profiles is locally maximal (based on a preliminary estimate of the radius of the cluster-quality-based approach). In a second step, we derive an optimal radius of the cluster (adaptive approach) so that only the significantly coexpressed genes are included in the cluster. This estimation is achieved by fitting a model to the data using an EM-algorithm. By inferring the radius from the data itself, the biologist is freed from finding an optimal value for this radius by trial-and-error. The computational complexity of this method is approximately linear in the number of gene expression profiles in the data set. Finally, our method is successfully validated using existing data sets. AVAILABILITY: http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~thijs/Work/Clustering.html     

Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering

MOTIVATION: Advances in molecular biological, analytical and computational technologies are enabling us to systematically investigate the complex molecular processes underlying biological systems. In particular, using high-throughput gene expression assays, we are able to measure the output of the gene regulatory network. We aim here to review datamining and modeling approaches for conceptualizing and unraveling the functional relationships implicit in these datasets. Clustering of co-expression profiles allows us to infer shared regulatory inputs and functional pathways. We discuss various aspects of clustering, ranging from distance measures to clustering algorithms and multiple-cluster memberships. More advanced analysis aims to infer causal connections between genes directly, i.e. who is regulating whom and how. We discuss several approaches to the problem of reverse engineering of genetic networks, from discrete Boolean networks, to continuous linear and non-linear models. We conclude that the combination of predictive modeling with systematic experimental verification will be required to gain a deeper insight into living organisms, therapeutic targeting and bioengineering.     

A robust approach based on Weibull distribution for clustering gene expression data

Background

Clustering is a widely used technique for analysis of gene expression data. Most clustering methods group genes based on the distances, while few methods group genes according to the similarities of the distributions of the gene expression levels. Furthermore, as the biological annotation resources accumulated, an increasing number of genes have been annotated into functional categories. As a result, evaluating the performance of clustering methods in terms of the functional consistency of the resulting clusters is of great interest.

Results

In this paper, we proposed the WDCM (Weibull Distribution-based Clustering Method), a robust approach for clustering gene expression data, in which the gene expressions of individual genes are considered as the random variables following unique Weibull distributions. Our WDCM is based on the concept that the genes with similar expression profiles have similar distribution parameters, and thus the genes are clustered via the Weibull distribution parameters. We used the WDCM to cluster three cancer gene expression data sets from the lung cancer, B-cell follicular lymphoma and bladder carcinoma and obtained well-clustered results. We compared the performance of WDCM with k-means and Self Organizing Map (SOM) using functional annotation information given by the Gene Ontology (GO). The results showed that the functional annotation ratios of WDCM are higher than those of the other methods. We also utilized the external measure Adjusted Rand Index to validate the performance of the WDCM. The comparative results demonstrate that the WDCM provides the better clustering performance compared to k-means and SOM algorithms. The merit of the proposed WDCM is that it can be applied to cluster incomplete gene expression data without imputing the missing values. Moreover, the robustness of WDCM is also evaluated on the incomplete data sets.

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that our WDCM produces clusters with more consistent functional annotations than the other methods. The WDCM is also verified to be robust and is capable of clustering gene expression data containing a small quantity of missing values.     

Mixture models with multiple levels, with application to the analysis of multifactor gene expression data

Model-based clustering is a popular tool for summarizing high-dimensional data. With the number of high-throughput large-scale gene expression studies still on the rise, the need for effective data- summarizing tools has never been greater. By grouping genes according to a common experimental expression profile, we may gain new insight into the biological pathways that steer biological processes of interest. Clustering of gene profiles can also assist in assigning functions to genes that have not yet been functionally annotated. In this paper, we propose 2 model selection procedures for model-based clustering. Model selection in model-based clustering has to date focused on the identification of data dimensions that are relevant for clustering. However, in more complex data structures, with multiple experimental factors, such an approach does not provide easily interpreted clustering outcomes. We propose a mixture model with multiple levels, , that provides sparse representations both "within" and "between" cluster profiles. We explore various flexible "within-cluster" parameterizations and discuss how efficient parameterizations can greatly enhance the objective interpretability of the generated clusters. Moreover, we allow for a sparse "between-cluster" representation with a different number of clusters at different levels of an experimental factor of interest. This enhances interpretability of clusters generated in multiple-factor contexts. Interpretable cluster profiles can assist in detecting biologically relevant groups of genes that may be missed with less efficient parameterizations. We use our multilevel mixture model to mine a proliferating cell line expression data set for annotational context and regulatory motifs. We also investigate the performance of the multilevel clustering approach on several simulated data sets.     

EXCAVATOR: a computer program for efficiently mining gene expression data

Massive amounts of gene expression data are generated using microarrays for functional studies of genes and gene expression data clustering is a useful tool for studying the functional relationship among genes in a biological process. We have developed a computer package EXCAVATOR for clustering gene expression profiles based on our new framework for representing gene expression data as a minimum spanning tree. EXCAVATOR uses a number of rigorous and efficient clustering algorithms. This program has a number of unique features, including capabilities for: (i) data- constrained clustering; (ii) identification of genes with similar expression profiles to pre-specified seed genes; (iii) cluster identification from a noisy background; (iv) computational comparison between different clustering results of the same data set. EXCAVATOR can be run from a Unix/Linux/DOS shell, from a Java interface or from a Web server. The clustering results can be visualized as colored figures and 2-dimensional plots. Moreover, EXCAVATOR provides a wide range of options for data formats, distance measures, objective functions, clustering algorithms, methods to choose number of clusters, etc. The effectiveness of EXCAVATOR has been demonstrated on several experimental data sets. Its performance compares favorably against the popular K-means clustering method in terms of clustering quality and computing time.     

Mining co-regulated gene profiles for the detection of functional associations in gene expression data

MOTIVATION: Association pattern discovery (APD) methods have been successfully applied to gene expression data. They find groups of co-regulated genes in which the genes are either up- or down-regulated throughout the identified conditions. These methods, however, fail to identify similarly expressed genes whose expressions change between up- and down-regulation from one condition to another. In order to discover these hidden patterns, we propose the concept of mining co-regulated gene profiles. Co-regulated gene profiles contain two gene sets such that genes within the same set behave identically (up or down) while genes from different sets display contrary behavior. To reduce and group the large number of similar resulting patterns, we propose a new similarity measure that can be applied together with hierarchical clustering methods. RESULTS: We tested our proposed method on two well-known yeast microarray data sets. Our implementation mined the data effectively and discovered patterns of co-regulated genes that are hidden to traditional APD methods. The high content of biologically relevant information in these patterns is demonstrated by the significant enrichment of co-regulated genes with similar functions. Our experimental results show that the Mining Attribute Profile (MAP) method is an efficient tool for the analysis of gene expression data and competitive with bi-clustering techniques.     

Identifying splits with clear separation: a new class discovery method for gene expression data

We present a new class discovery method for microarray gene expression data. Based on a collection of gene expression profiles from different tissue samples, the method searches for binary class distinctions in the set of samples that show clear separation in the expression levels of specific subsets of genes. Several mutually independent class distinctions may be found, which is difficult to obtain from most commonly used clustering algorithms. Each class distinction can be biologically interpreted in terms of its supporting genes. The mathematical characterization of the favored class distinctions is based on statistical concepts. By analyzing three data sets from cancer gene expression studies, we demonstrate that our method is able to detect biologically relevant structures, for example cancer subtypes, in an unsupervised fashion.     

A new DNA sequence entropy-based Kullback-Leibler algorithm for gene clustering

Information theory is a branch of mathematics that overlaps with communications, biology, and medical engineering. Entropy is a measure of uncertainty in the set of information. In this study, for each gene and its exons sets, the entropy was calculated in orders one to four. Based on the relative entropy of genes and exons, Kullback-Leibler divergence was calculated. After obtaining the Kullback-Leibler distance for genes and exons sets, the results were entered as input into 7 clustering algorithms: single, complete, average, weighted, centroid, median, and K-means. To aggregate the results of clustering, the AdaBoost algorithm was used. Finally, the results of the AdaBoost algorithm were investigated by GeneMANIA prediction server to explore the results from gene annotation point of view. All calculations were performed using the MATLAB Engineering Software (2015). Following our findings on investigating the results of genes metabolic pathways based on the gene annotations, it was revealed that our proposed clustering method yielded correct, logical, and fast results. This method at the same that had not had the disadvantages of aligning allowed the genes with actual length and content to be considered and also did not require high memory for large-length sequences. We believe that the performance of the proposed method could be used with other competitive gene clustering methods to group biologically relevant set of genes. Also, the proposed method can be seen as a predictive method for those genes bearing up weak genomic annotations.     

Integrating functional knowledge during sample clustering for microarray data using unsupervised decision trees

Clustering of microarray gene expression data is performed routinely, for genes as well as for samples. Clustering of genes can exhibit functional relationships between genes; clustering of samples on the other hand is important for finding e.g. disease subtypes, relevant patient groups for stratification or related treatments. Usually this is done by first filtering the genes for high-variance under the assumption that they carry most of the information needed for separating different sample groups. If this assumption is violated, important groupings in the data might be lost. Furthermore, classical clustering methods do not facilitate the biological interpretation of the results. Therefore, we propose to methodologically integrate the clustering algorithm with prior biological information. This is different from other approaches as knowledge about classes of genes can be directly used to ease the interpretation of the results and possibly boost clustering performance. Our approach computes dendrograms that resemble decision trees with gene classes used to split the data at each node which can help to find biologically meaningful differences between the sample groups. We have tested the proposed method both on simulated and real data and conclude its usefulness as a complementary method, especially when assumptions of few differentially expressed genes along with an informative mapping of genes to different classes are met.     

Noise-robust soft clustering of gene expression time-course data

Clustering is an important tool in microarray data analysis. This unsupervised learning technique is commonly used to reveal structures hidden in large gene expression data sets. The vast majority of clustering algorithms applied so far produce hard partitions of the data, i.e. each gene is assigned exactly to one cluster. Hard clustering is favourable if clusters are well separated. However, this is generally not the case for microarray time-course data, where gene clusters frequently overlap. Additionally, hard clustering algorithms are often highly sensitive to noise. To overcome the limitations of hard clustering, we applied soft clustering which offers several advantages for researchers. First, it generates accessible internal cluster structures, i.e. it indicates how well corresponding clusters represent genes. This can be used for the more targeted search for regulatory elements. Second, the overall relation between clusters, and thus a global clustering structure, can be defined. Additionally, soft clustering is more noise robust and a priori pre-filtering of genes can be avoided. This prevents the exclusion of biologically relevant genes from the data analysis. Soft clustering was implemented here using the fuzzy c-means algorithm. Procedures to find optimal clustering parameters were developed. A software package for soft clustering has been developed based on the open-source statistical language R. The package called Mfuzz is freely available.     

Scoring clustering solutions by their biological relevance

MOTIVATION: A central step in the analysis of gene expression data is the identification of groups of genes that exhibit similar expression patterns. Clustering gene expression data into homogeneous groups was shown to be instrumental in functional annotation, tissue classification, regulatory motif identification, and other applications. Although there is a rich literature on clustering algorithms for gene expression analysis, very few works addressed the systematic comparison and evaluation of clustering results. Typically, different clustering algorithms yield different clustering solutions on the same data, and there is no agreed upon guideline for choosing among them. RESULTS: We developed a novel statistically based method for assessing a clustering solution according to prior biological knowledge. Our method can be used to compare different clustering solutions or to optimize the parameters of a clustering algorithm. The method is based on projecting vectors of biological attributes of the clustered elements onto the real line, such that the ratio of between-groups and within-group variance estimators is maximized. The projected data are then scored using a non-parametric analysis of variance test, and the score's confidence is evaluated. We validate our approach using simulated data and show that our scoring method outperforms several extant methods, including the separation to homogeneity ratio and the silhouette measure. We apply our method to evaluate results of several clustering methods on yeast cell-cycle gene expression data. AVAILABILITY: The software is available from the authors upon request.     

Complementary hierarchical clustering

When applying hierarchical clustering algorithms to cluster patient samples from microarray data, the clustering patterns generated by most algorithms tend to be dominated by groups of highly differentially expressed genes that have closely related expression patterns. Sometimes, these genes may not be relevant to the biological process under study or their functions may already be known. The problem is that these genes can potentially drown out the effects of other genes that are relevant or have novel functions. We propose a procedure called complementary hierarchical clustering that is designed to uncover the structures arising from these novel genes that are not as highly expressed. Simulation studies show that the procedure is effective when applied to a variety of examples. We also define a concept called relative gene importance that can be used to identify the influential genes in a given clustering. Finally, we analyze a microarray data set from 295 breast cancer patients, using clustering with the correlation-based distance measure. The complementary clustering reveals a grouping of the patients which is uncorrelated with a number of known prognostic signatures and significantly differing distant metastasis-free probabilities.     

Validating clustering for gene expression data

MOTIVATION: Many clustering algorithms have been proposed for the analysis of gene expression data, but little guidance is available to help choose among them. We provide a systematic framework for assessing the results of clustering algorithms. Clustering algorithms attempt to partition the genes into groups exhibiting similar patterns of variation in expression level. Our methodology is to apply a clustering algorithm to the data from all but one experimental condition. The remaining condition is used to assess the predictive power of the resulting clusters-meaningful clusters should exhibit less variation in the remaining condition than clusters formed by chance. RESULTS: We successfully applied our methodology to compare six clustering algorithms on four gene expression data sets. We found our quantitative measures of cluster quality to be positively correlated with external standards of cluster quality.     

The computational analysis of scientific literature to define and recognize gene expression clusters

A limitation of many gene expression analytic approaches is that they do not incorporate comprehensive background knowledge about the genes into the analysis. We present a computational method that leverages the peer-reviewed literature in the automatic analysis of gene expression data sets. Including the literature in the analysis of gene expression data offers an opportunity to incorporate functional information about the genes when defining expression clusters. We have created a method that associates gene expression profiles with known biological functions. Our method has two steps. First, we apply hierarchical clustering to the given gene expression data set. Secondly, we use text from abstracts about genes to (i) resolve hierarchical cluster boundaries to optimize the functional coherence of the clusters and (ii) recognize those clusters that are most functionally coherent. In the case where a gene has not been investigated and therefore lacks primary literature, articles about well-studied homologous genes are added as references. We apply our method to two large gene expression data sets with different properties. The first contains measurements for a subset of well-studied Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes with multiple literature references, and the second contains newly discovered genes in Drosophila melanogaster; many have no literature references at all. In both cases, we are able to rapidly define and identify the biologically relevant gene expression profiles without manual intervention. In both cases, we identified novel clusters that were not noted by the original investigators.     

Information criterion-based clustering with order-restricted candidate profiles in short time-course microarray experiments

Background  

Time-course microarray experiments produce vector gene expression profiles across a series of time points. Clustering genes based on these profiles is important in discovering functional related and co-regulated genes. Early developed clustering algorithms do not take advantage of the ordering in a time-course study, explicit use of which should allow more sensitive detection of genes that display a consistent pattern over time. Peddada et al. [1] proposed a clustering algorithm that can incorporate the temporal ordering using order-restricted statistical inference. This algorithm is, however, very time-consuming and hence inapplicable to most microarray experiments that contain a large number of genes. Its computational burden also imposes difficulty to assess the clustering reliability, which is a very important measure when clustering noisy microarray data.     

Trustworthiness and metrics in visualizing similarity of gene expression

Background

Conventionally, the first step in analyzing the large and high-dimensional data sets measured by microarrays is visual exploration. Dendrograms of hierarchical clustering, self-organizing maps (SOMs), and multidimensional scaling have been used to visualize similarity relationships of data samples. We address two central properties of the methods: (i) Are the visualizations trustworthy, i.e., if two samples are visualized to be similar, are they really similar? (ii) The metric. The measure of similarity determines the result; we propose using a new learning metrics principle to derive a metric from interrelationships among data sets.

Results

The trustworthiness of hierarchical clustering, multidimensional scaling, and the self-organizing map were compared in visualizing similarity relationships among gene expression profiles. The self-organizing map was the best except that hierarchical clustering was the most trustworthy for the most similar profiles. Trustworthiness can be further increased by treating separately those genes for which the visualization is least trustworthy. We then proceed to improve the metric. The distance measure between the expression profiles is adjusted to measure differences relevant to functional classes of the genes. The genes for which the new metric is the most different from the usual correlation metric are listed and visualized with one of the visualization methods, the self-organizing map, computed in the new metric.

Conclusions

The conjecture from the methodological results is that the self-organizing map can be recommended to complement the usual hierarchical clustering for visualizing and exploring gene expression data. Discarding the least trustworthy samples and improving the metric still improves it.

     

Consensus framework for exploring microarray data using multiple clustering methods

The large variety of clustering algorithms and their variants can be daunting to researchers wishing to explore patterns within their microarray datasets. Furthermore, each clustering method has distinct biases in finding patterns within the data, and clusterings may not be reproducible across different algorithms. A consensus approach utilizing multiple algorithms can show where the various methods agree and expose robust patterns within the data. In this paper, we present a software package - Consense, written for R/Bioconductor - that utilizes such an approach to explore microarray datasets. Consense produces clustering results for each of the clustering methods and produces a report of metrics comparing the individual clusterings. A feature of Consense is identification of genes that cluster consistently with an index gene across methods. Utilizing simulated microarray data, sensitivity of the metrics to the biases of the different clustering algorithms is explored. The framework is easily extensible, allowing this tool to be used by other functional genomic data types, as well as other high-throughput OMICS data types generated from metabolomic and proteomic experiments. It also provides a flexible environment to benchmark new clustering algorithms. Consense is currently available as an installable R/Bioconductor package (http://www.ohsucancer.com/isrdev/consense/).     

Genetic network inference: the effects of preprocessing

Clustering of gene expression data and gene network inference from such data has been a major research topic in recent years. In clustering, pairwise measurements are performed when calculating the distance matrix upon which the clustering is based. Pairwise measurements can also be used for gene network inference, by deriving potential interactions above a certain correlation or distance threshold. Our experiments show how interaction networks derived by this simple approach exhibit low-but significant-sensitivity and specificity. We also explore the effects that normalization and prefiltering have on the results of methods for identifying interactions from expression data. Before derivation of interactions or clustering, preprocessing is often performed by applying normalization to rescale the expression profiles and prefiltering where genes that do not appear to contribute to regulation are removed. In this paper, different ways of normalizing in combination with different distance measurements are tested on both unfiltered and prefiltered data, different prefiltering criteria are considered.