Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment,diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract1

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has been proved to be safe, efficient and reliable in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This study evaluated specimen adequacy, diagnostic criteria of various pancreatic neoplasms and contamination from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods: EUS‐guided FNA of the pancreas and subsequent surgical resections performed at the University of California Irvine Medical Center during February 1996–October 2000 were retrospectively selected. Modified Papanicolaou staining method was used for immediate evaluation and cell block prepared. Results: A total of 267 cases were available for review, including 147 (55.1%) positive/suspicious, 10 (3.7%) atypical, 96 (36.0%) negative and 14 (5.2%) unsatisfactory cases. Eighty‐six (58.5%) positive/suspicious cases had histological confirmation and 12 (8.3%) had lymph node or distant metastases by cytology. Three atypical, two negative, and two unsatisfactory cases proved to have adenocarcinoma. Contamination from duodenum, stomach or pancreas was found in 77 positive/suspicious, three atypical and 90 negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were 94.6%, 100%, 95.6%, 100%, 82% respectively. Conclusions: EUS FNA is efficient and accurate in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms in adequate samples. Contamination from the GI tract should be well recognized to avoid misinterpretation.     

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme

Objective

To compare endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐FNAC diagnosis of pancreatic lesions with patient outcome based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme diagnostic categories: Panc 1 (non‐diagnostic); Panc 2 (negative for malignancy/neoplasia); Panc 3 (atypical); Panc 4B (neoplastic, benign); Panc 4O (neoplastic, other); Panc 5 (suspicious of malignancy); and Panc 6 (positive/malignant).

Methods

All EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens taken at Manchester Royal Infirmary in 2015 were prospectively classified according to the above scheme at the time of cytology reporting and data recorded prospectively. Subsequently, outcomes based on clinical follow‐up or histopathology diagnosis were compared with the cytology diagnosis.

Results

120 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from 111 patients were received, of which 112 (93.3%) specimens had follow‐up data. There were 79 and 41 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from solid and cystic lesions, respectively. Based on the cytology diagnosis the specimens were classified as Panc 1 (7.5%), Panc 2 (33.3%), Panc 3 (2.5%), Panc 4B (2.5%), Panc 4O (15.0%), Panc 5 (3.3%) and Panc 6 (35.9%). The performance indicators for diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasia with malignant potential, included sensitivity (95.4%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (92.3%), false positive rate (0%) and false negative rate (4.6%).

Conclusions

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme is a logical system that can easily be introduced in a diagnostic cytopathology service. This classification scheme acts as an aid to diagnostic reporting, clear communication of significant results including risk of neoplasia/malignancy to clinicians, clinical audit and comparison of results with other centres.     

Optimizing specimen collection and laboratory procedures reduces the non‐diagnostic rate for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of solid lesions of the pancreas

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is a routine technique to assess solid pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of optimizing laboratory procedures for specimen preparation on the rate and accuracy of the procedure. Methods: All EUS‐FNAs of solid pancreatic lesions performed during the year 2000 (Period 1) and from May 2003 to May 2004 (Period 2) were analysed. During Period 1, one experienced gastroenterologist performed all EUS‐FNAs, making direct smears and retrieving small fragments if present on the smear for histology. In Period 2, two endoscopists performed the EUS‐FNAs and all the material was emptied into a vial containing a fixative. Slide preparation was carried out in the pathology laboratory: one slide was processed using cytocentrifugation and cell blocks were made from left‐over material. Neither period utilized rapid on‐site evaluation. Results: During the two periods, 67 and 102 FNAs were analysed and showed significantly different (P < 0.001) non‐diagnostic rates of 22.8% and 4.2%, respectively. The increased diagnostic yield can be explained by the modified laboratory procedures and to a lesser extent by the increased experience of the gastroenterologists. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy in the second time period were, respectively, 90.6%, 100%, 100%, 81.8% and 93.4%, not significantly different from the first time period. Conclusion: This study shows that accurate EUS‐FNA results may be obtained with a low non‐diagnostic rate comparable to those reported for rapid on‐site evaluation by optimizing laboratory specimen processing in a setting of solid pancreatic lesions.     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA

S. Zhang, D. V. S. DeFrias, R. Alasadi and R. Nayar
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) has become widely accepted as an effective modality for obtaining tissue for primary diagnosis and staging. We have been using EUS‐FNA since July 2001 and herein we summarize our experience over a 5‐year period. Methods: A computer‐based search for in‐house EUS‐FNA was performed in the pathology database from July 2001 to October 2006. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS‐FNA, the cytology diagnosis was compared with the surgical follow‐up. Results: A total of 951 EUS‐FNAs were performed during the study period and included 279 pancreatic solid lesions, 186 pancreatic cyst lesions, 249 lymph node aspirations, 111 gastrointestinal (GI) tract submucosal lesions, and 126 miscellaneous lesions. EUS‐FNA had a very high sensitivity and accuracy for solid pancreatic lesions (94.7 and 97.7%, respectively), low sensitivity and accuracy but high specificity (47, 64.8 and 95%, respectively) for cystic lesions. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic (CEA) levels were significantly higher in mucinous neoplasms than non‐neoplastic cysts. EUS‐FNA also had very high sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic carcinoma in lymph nodes (95 and 100%, respectively). GI submucosal spindle cell tumours were further classified with immunohistochemical stains performed either on a cell block or a core biopsy obtained via EUS guidance. Conclusions: EUS‐FNA has a very high sensitivity and accuracy for pancreatic solid lesions, but the sensitivity for cystic lesions is generally low. Cyst fluid chemical analysis for CEA is helpful, but the overlap between mucinous neoplasm and non‐neoplastic cysts is significant. Recognizing GI contamination is important and immunohistochemical stains are useful for GI submucosal spindle cell lesions.     

Fine needle aspiration of poorly defined indurated and well-defined breast lesions: a cytopathologic comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cytologic findings and diagnoses of breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples of well-defined lesions (WDL) with those of poorly defined indurated lesions. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 371 consecutive breast FNA specimens obtained without diagnostic image guidance. Fifty-eight lesions were described by the examining pathologists as PDILs, and the remaining 313 lesions were described as WDLs. RESULTS: Compared with WDLs, PDILs were more likely to yield hypocellular specimens deemed unsatisfactory for diagnostic evaluation (37.9% vs. 14.1%). However, a substantial number of atypical, suspicious for malignancy and malignant cases (12.1%, 5.2%, and 13.8%, respectively) were identified with PDILs. In addition, benign diagnoses were more frequently rendered with aspirates of WDLs, compared with PDILs (47.9% vs. 31.0%). In our study, FNAs of PDILs were more often diagnostic in white women < 49 years of age and in lesions measuring > 2 cm. CONCLUSION: Given the relatively high frequency of malignant, suspicious and atypical lesions detected with PDILs, FNA is a suitable first diagnostic approach for PDILs, especially considering the relatively low cost and simplicity of FNA procedures without diagnostic imaging guidance.     

Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules

A. Fassina, M. Corradin, D. Zardo, R. Cappellesso, F. Corbetti and M. Fassan
Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules Objective: To prospectively investigate the role of trans‐thoracic fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and the value of rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) in the clinical management of patients with pulmonary nodules/masses. Computed tomography (CT)‐guided FNA is commonly employed for the diagnosis of lung lesions although its position in the diagnostic work‐up is still a matter of debate. Methods: We reviewed 311 patients (211 males and 100 females, mean age 69.5 years) admitted to the University of Padova from 2004 to 2008, correlating the results of cytology with the available histological findings obtained from biopsies, surgery or autopsy. Results: Smears were adequate in 305 cases (98%) and inadequate in six (2%); a diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 263 cases (86.2%); 39 cases (12.8%) were classified as non‐malignant; and three cases (1%) were classified as suspect for malignancy. When correlated with histology, FNA with ROSE discriminated malignant versus non‐malignant lesions (Cohen’s kappa 0.78), with three false negatives (sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 100%). Moreover, a satisfactory overall agreement of 71.4% was achieved in differentiating the cancer histological types. Pneumothorax occurred in 13 cases, haemoptysis in four, and chest pain in three. A single aspiration was sufficient in 79.6% of patients; two aspirations were needed in 17.4% and three in 3%. The low complication rate was related to the limited number of aspirations needed due to ROSE. Conclusions: FNA with ROSE is a safe and useful tool in the diagnostic work‐up of lung cancer patients, with no contraindications to its use as the first diagnostic procedure for all patients with peripheral lung lesions. FNA with ROSE should be reconsidered in the guidelines for diagnosing and managing lung cancer.     

Accuracy and consistency in application of a probabilistic approach to reporting breast fine needle aspiration

OBJECTIVE: To determine the application of a probabilistic/categorical approach for reporting breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) and its dependence on the cytopathologist's level of experience. STUDY DESIGN: All breast surgical specimens that had preoperative breast FNA at our institution during a 3-year period were identified. The cytologic results were reported as 1 of 6 categories: positive, suspicious, atypical, epithelial proliferative, unremarkable and nondiagnostic, according to well-defined criteria. Five cytopathologists were responsible for all cytology sing-out during the study period. The histologic and cytologic diagnoses were correlated. RESULTS: A total of 297 cases were identified. Overall, there were no false positive cases (positive predictive value [PPV] = 100%). Two false negative cases (negative predictive value [NPV] = 96%) were due to sampling error. This indicates that the PPV and NPV for each of the 5 pathologists were also all 100% except for the 1 pathologist who had two false negative cases due to sampling errors. The probability of finding carcinoma on histology for suspicious and atypical cytologic categories ranged from 67% to 100% and 8% to 31%, respectively, for the individual pathologists. Fifteen cases were signed out by > or = 2 pathologists. The involvement of consultants was significantly associated with diagnosis (P = .02). Ten of the 15 cases were in the suspicious (5) or atypical (5) category. CONCLUSION: The probabilistic approach with defined diagnostic criteria is an accurate method and can be consistently applied in reporting breast FNA. Although use of the indeterminate (suspicious and atypical) categories is variable, a definite and considerable difference in the probability of carcinoma between these 2 categories was observed for all pathologists. The involvement of consultants did not move the cases out of these indeterminate categories.     

Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry

A. Stacchini, P. Carucci, D. Pacchioni, G. Accinelli, A. Demurtas, S. Aliberti, M. Bosco, M. Bruno, A. Balbo Mussetto, M. Rizzetto, G. Bussolati and C. De Angelis
Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry Objective: Although endoscopic ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is rapidly becoming the preferred diagnostic approach for the sampling and diagnosis of gastrointestinal and mediastinal malignancies, there are limited data as to its use in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective evaluation of the performance of EUS‐guided FNA combined with flow cytometry (FC) as a tool to improve overall sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Methods: Of 1560 patients having EUS‐guided FNA during the period of the study, a total of 56 patients were evaluated by cytology with FC after EUS‐FNA. There was adequate material to perform FC analysis for all but one case. Results: EUS‐FNA‐FC gave a diagnosis of lymphoma in 11 cases and of reactive lymphadenopathy in 20. A specific histological type was defined by FC alone in eight cases. The remaining cases were diagnosed later by cytology and cell block sections: 13 carcinomas, nine granulomatous lymphadenopathies and one mediastinal extramedullary haematopoiesis. One case was considered only suspicious for lymphoma on cytology and FC but was not confirmed on molecular analysis and one had insufficient material for FC. Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of EUS‐FNA‐FC is a feasible and highly accurate method, which may be used for the diagnosis and subtyping of deep‐seated lymphoma, providing a significant improvement to cytomorphology alone both for diagnosis and treatment planning, as long as immunocytochemistry is available for non‐lymphoma cases.     

Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours

Y. Kopelman, S. Marmor, I. Ashkenazi and Z. Fireman
Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is performed in order to achieve a definite tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This in turn is a guide to the appropriate treatment for the patient. Tissue samples collected by the same needle for cytological preparations and cell block histological sections (often referred to as FNA‐cytology and FNA–biopsy, respectively) are handled differently. The specific contribution of each of these tests was evaluated. Methods: One hundred and two consecutive patients underwent EUS‐FNA while being investigated for pancreatic solid lesions. Diagnosis was made by cytology, cell block sections or both. The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical outcome. Results: Male/female ratio was 61/41. Mean age was 65 ± 12 years (range, 22–94). Mean lesion size was 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (range, 0.6–10 cm); 68% were >2 cm and 75% were located in the pancreatic head. The average number of needle passes was two (range, 1–4 passes). Final tissue diagnosis was malignant in 66 (65%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 73%, 94% and 81%, respectively, for cytology alone, and 63%, 100% and 78%, for cell blocks alone. Eighty‐two patients (80%) had cytology and cell blocks, which matched in 64 (78%) patients. EUS‐FNA results that relied on both techniques had 84% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 88% accuracy. Cytology revealed 13 malignancies not diagnosed on cell blocks, while cell blocks revealed five malignancies not diagnosed by cytology. Malignant lesions were more common in men; they were larger in size and located in the pancreatic head. Conclusion: EUS‐FNA cytology was more sensitive than cell blocks but less specific for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. The two methods are complementary and implementing both improves the diagnostic value of EUS‐FNA.     

Posters. P17 Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard investigation in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Published data suggest an overall accuracy rate of 75% 1 in the detection of thyroid malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology in detection of thyroid malignancy in our surgical unit. Methods Between 1989–2002, 144 patients who underwent thyroid resection by single consultant surgeon and who had pre‐operative FNA were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pre‐operative FNA results were compared with definitive histological diagnosis following thyroid resection. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed using aspirate and non‐aspirate techniques on each thyroid swelling. The cytological sample was assessed by a single cytopathologist and was classified as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, neoplastic, suspicious or indeterminate. The histology was classified as non‐neoplastic (benign) and neoplastic (malignant). Results Fine needle aspiration cytology analysis revealed 94 (13.88%) non‐neoplastic, six (65.27%) neoplastic and 20 (4.16%) suspicious aspirates. Twenty (13.88%) samples were inadequate and four (2.77%) samples were indeterminate. Histological analysis showed 118 (81.94%) benign, 26 (18.05%) malignant specimens. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of 52.6%, 86.6% and 79.1%, respectively for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Conclusion The results are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology in our hands is accurate investigation for pre‐operative diagnosis for the detection of thyroid malignancy.     

Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology

N. Dincer, S. Balci, A. Yazgan, G. Guney, R. Ersoy, B. Cakir and G. Guler
Follow‐up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology Objective: To report our experience of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) rate and outcome. Methods: Among 7658 patients with 19 569 nodules, 524 (2.7%) nodules were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNA). After exclusion of patients with simultaneous nodules that were suspicious for follicular neoplasm or malignancy or that were malignant, 368 (4.8%) patients were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. The outcome of 146 patients who had undergone surgery or repeated fine needle aspirate at the time of preparation of this study was evaluated. The original FNAs were matched to repeated FNAs and thyroidectomy or diagnostic lobectomy specimens. Results: Seventy‐two (19.6%) of the 368 patients had directly undergone surgery, either a lobectomy or a thyroidectomy: of these, 27 (37.5%) had neoplastic nodules (21 were malignant). Seventy‐four (20.1%) of the 368 patients had repeat FNA. On second FNA, 47 of 74 (63.5%) were benign, three were suspicious for follicular neoplasm, one was malignant and 23 (31.1%) were non‐diagnostic. Four patients had a third FNA: two were AUS/FLUS, one was malignant and one non‐diagnostic. One patient had a fourth FNA, which was diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Sixteen (21.6%) of 74 patients with repeat FNA had surgery: three of these had neoplastic nodules (two were malignant). Overall, 88 of the 368 (23.9%) patients had a thyroidectomy of which 30 (34.1%) were neoplastic and 23 (26.1%) malignant. The neoplastic rate for patients who were once diagnosed with AUS/FLUS was 8.2% and the malignancy rate 6.3%. The malignancy rate for patients on follow‐up at the time we prepared the study was 15.7% (23/146); 222 remained on follow‐up without surgery or repeat FNA or were managed elsewhere. Conclusions: Although in this category repeat FNA is expected rather than excision, we suggest evaluation of all AUS/FLUS patients in multidisciplinary meetings to decide management and recommend follow‐up of all patients with this diagnosis.     

Analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: a review of 1,297 cases and correlation with histologic diagnoses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of the breast and to ascertain its usefulness. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed 1,297 cases of FNA cytology of the breast which were performed at Chonnam National University Hospital from 1999 to 2002. Cytologic diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses in 457 cases that underwent both cytologic and histologic examination. RESULTS: Of 1,297 cases, 1,201 (92.6%) were satisfactory and 96 (7.4%) unsatisfactory. Subsequent histologic examination was performed on 291 cases (29.7%) out of 981 "benign" lesions, 28 (73.7%) of 38 "suspicious," 124 (68.1%) of 182 "malignant" and 14 (14.6%) of 96 "unsatisfactory." FNA cytology revealed 77.7% sensitivity, 99.2% specificity, 98.4% positive predictive value and 88.0% negative predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy was 91.1%. Of the 291 benign cases on cytology, 35 cases were malignancy on histology. Of the 124 cases reported as malignant, 2 were benign. Interpretive error was the leading cause of false positive diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Although FNA cytology is a useful diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of breast lesions, it should be combined with other diagnostic modalities, such as physical examination, ultrasonography and mammography.     

Role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study of nine cases

Objective

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is an established first‐line procedure in the management of solid and cystic pancreatic masses. Lymphoma is an uncommon diagnosis in EUS‐FNA of the pancreas, and it is more common for such a diagnosis to be because of secondary involvement of the pancreas by a lymphoproliferative disorder than for this to represent isolated primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL). We present the clinical, EUS and cytological features of these lesions.

Material and methods

After obtaining approval from our Institutional Review Board (IRB), nine cases of lymphoma diagnosed on EUS‐FNA at a tertiary care cancer centre over a period of 8 years from 2008 to 2016 were retrieved from our endoscopy and pathology archives. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) was carried out by a trained cytopathologist in all these cases. Cell blocks were available in seven cases, and immunophenotyping was performed on cell blocks using the immunoperoxidase method. Flow cytometry was performed in two cases.

Results

The most frequent site of involvement was the head of the pancreas (n=5, 55.6%). Four out of nine cases were diagnosed as PPL (44.4%). Five cases were diagnosed as lymphoma secondarily involving the pancreas (55.6%). The most frequent diagnosis was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (n=6, 66.7%), followed by Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2, 22.2%) and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (n=1, 11.1%).

Conclusion

EUS‐FNA in experienced hands is a valuable diagnostic modality, in conjunction with ROSE, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, in the diagnosis and sub‐typing of both primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma.     

Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of Warthin’s tumour of the salivary glands

J. M. Viguer, B. Vicandi, J. A. Jiménez‐Heffernan, P. López‐Ferrer, P. González‐Peramato and C. Castillo
Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of Warthin’s tumour of the salivary glands Objective: Local excision surgical procedures and non‐surgical conservative management are considered alternatives to superficial parotidectomy in the treatment and management of Warthin’s tumour (WT). Such therapeutic alternatives demand accurate diagnosis. In order to determine whether fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is capable of rendering such a minimally invasive diagnosis, we evaluated its accuracy and diagnostic parameters in a large series of histologically proven cases of WT. Methods: A cytohistological study of 116 salivary tumours from 110 patients (four WT were bilateral) with a histological or cytological diagnosis of WT. Results: Histology confirmed the cytological diagnosis in 103 of 114 tumours (90.4%). Two tumours were incorrectly diagnosed on cytology as WT. In 11 cases of WT there was an erroneous or non‐representative cytological diagnosis. The sensitivity was 90.4%, and positive predictive value 98.1%. Regarding malignancy, there were three misdiagnoses. One tumour diagnosed as WT was a low‐grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Two cases considered ‘suspicious of squamous cell carcinoma’ corresponded to WT. After review, 81.3% of the cases of WT were considered typical and 18.7% non‐typical; all misdiagnoses were in the latter group. Cytological difficulties could be divided into three areas: (i) absence of one or more diagnostic components; (ii) ‘squamoid’ pattern; and (iii) mucinous metaplasia. Degenerated oncocytes were present in 65% of cases. Conclusions: FNAC offers the possibility of a reliable diagnosis of WT. Pathologists must pay attention to the squamous appearance of degenerated oncocytes. Cytology, when coupled with clinical and image findings, may permit conservative tumour management.     

Pancreatic fine needle aspiration. A comparison of computed tomographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic guidance

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic fine needle aspiration (FNA) with computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. STUDY DESIGN: A 6-year retrospective review included 137 pancreatic FNAs (CT 51, magnetic resonance imaging 2 or EUS 84). Clinical or histologic follow-up was available for 110 patients. RESULTS: Positive (POS), suspicious (SUS), atypical, negative and unsatisfactory (UNSAT) results represented 25.5%, 7.3%, 7.3%, 40.1% and 19.1% of reported diagnoses, respectively. In detecting malignancy, the sensitivities of POS/SUS results were 71% and 42% for CT and EUS, respectively, with negative predictive value (NPV) of 41% and 45%. Also, 35% of UNSAT results were found to have malignancy. However, EUS was used on more difficult lesions, including 82% of small, cystic ones and 75% of small, solid ones. CONCLUSION: Although the apparent performance of percutaneous CT-guided biopsies surpasses that of EUS, this is due to the choice of endoscopy for more difficult lesions. The specificity and negative predictive value of EUS and CT are similar.     

FNA of breast fibroadenoma: observer variability and review of cytomorphology with cytohistological correlation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the observer variability in reporting fibroadenoma of the breast by fine needle aspiration (FNA) and to review the cytomorphological features of the lesion with cytohistological correlation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of FNA smears from 110 cases diagnosed as fibroadenoma of which surgical pathology follow-up was available in 33. Two pathologists were asked to categorize smears from 67 cases of breast lesions while blinded to the clinical finding as fibroadenoma, epithelial hyperplasia (usual and atypical) and malignant. All fibroadenoma (33) and cancer (15) cases were biopsy-proven. The same set of slides was re-circulated to one of the pathologists, and his first and second round results were compared. RESULTS: Pre-review cytohistological correlation was attained in 32 of 33 cases of fibroadenoma (97%). The overall agreement between the two observers was 87% [Kappa = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.76]. Cytohistological correlation was achieved in 26 of 33 (79%) cases. Intra-observer agreement was 91% (Kappa = 0.82, 95% CI 0.89-0.93) with cytohistological correlation in 29 of 33 (87%) cases. Causes of diagnostic errors included marked dissociation, pleomorphism, poorly cellular smears from hyalinized fibrodenoma, lacational changes and apocrine metaplasia with cystic changes. Multinucleated giant cells were frequently encountered in FNA smears from fibroadenoma (31.8%), but in none of the lumpectomy specimens. Their histiocytic nature was suggested by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: FNA was a highly sensitive method for the diagnosis of fibroadenoma. Current cytological criteria were reliable and gave high inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.     

Use of CUSUM and Shewhart charts to monitor regional trends of birth defect reports in New York State

BACKGROUND: Cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts were originally developed for industrial quality control, but may be adapted for the surveillance of health outcome data, such as birth defects. The reported prevalence of birth defects can vary due to differences in case ascertainment, surveillance practices, or true changes in prevalence. We examined the utility of CUSUM and Shewhart charts for detect-ing changes in prevalence of two different birth defect groups. We chose obstructive renal defects because we expected an increase in reporting due to improved diagnosis. We chose oral clefts for comparison because we expected reporting to be unaffected by changes in diagnostic technologies. METHODS: Data from the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry from 1992-1999 were analyzed using self-starting binomial CUSUM and Shewhart charts for four regions of New York State. RESULTS: CUSUM charts show that reports of obstructive urinary defects have increased from 1992-1999 in all regions of New York State. Reports of oral clefts increased only on Long Island. CONCLUSIONS: The CUSUM method proved useful for identifying changes in birth defect reporting and was able to detect the expected increases in obstructive renal defects. The apparent increase is likely due to improvements in diagnostic imaging techniques. In contrast, we only detected an increase in oral clefts on Long Island, which may be related to under report-ing of cases in the earlier years. CUSUM charts are useful in detecting small, sustained increases in prevalences over time while Shewhart charts are easier to interpret and can detect large sharp increases.     

The utility of assessing the gross appearances of FNA specimens

F. Mayall, A. Cormack, S. Slater and K. McAnulty The utility of assessing the gross appearances of FNA specimens Objective: Ideally, fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology should be performed with near‐patient assessment of the adequacy of the specimen by a cytopathologist. However, this is often not feasible. A cruder alternative is for the FNA practitioner to examine the gross appearances of the specimen and to try to predict the its quality. This study set out to determine the value of this approach. Methods: The study was conducted in tertiary public hospitals in New Zealand and the UK. FNA gross material grading was performed by a variety of pathologists on FNA samples taken using manual guidance and image guidance. The FNA gross material grade was compared with the findings on microscopic examination. Results: Nine out of 123 FNA samples were assessed as Grade 1 (unlikely to contain diagnostic material). All were subsequently reported as having insufficient diagnostic tissue on microscopic examination. Forty‐two of the FNA samples were assessed as Grade 2 (possibly contains diagnostic material) and 46 as Grade 3 (probably contains diagnostic material). None from either of these grades was reported as showing insufficient diagnostic material on microscopic examination. Twenty‐six cases were reported as Grade 4 (material suggesting a specific diagnosis). None of these was reported as showing insufficient diagnostic material on microscopic examination. The most common Grade 4 provisional diagnosis was that of a colloid cyst or colloid nodule of the thyroid (seven cases). Only two cases had misleading Grade 4 provisional diagnoses. Both were thought to be pus on gross examination but showed necrotic carcinoma on microscopic examination. Conclusions: The gross appearances of FNA samples can usually predict the adequacy of the samples and sometimes predict the final microscopic diagnosis. However, near‐patient microscopic assessment of FNA specimens is preferable if available.     

Value of the cytologic analysis of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas

Between 1982 and 1986, 410 preoperative percutaneous fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of the pancreas were performed on 316 patients clinically suspected of having a malignant pancreatic tumor. Of 58 patients with pancreatic carcinomas subsequently confirmed by histologic investigation, the FNA biopsy yielded a cytologically positive diagnosis of carcinoma in 39 cases (67.2%) and suspicious findings in another 5 cases (8.6%). In 14 cases of malignancy (24.1%), the FNA puncture failed to sample material from the tumor; hence, the cytologic evaluation yielded false-negative results. Of 21 patients with inflammatory disorders of the pancreas, cytologically suspicious cells were observed in 5 cases (23.8%); in none of those 5 cases did the histologic examination show any evidence of carcinoma. This indicates that caution should be taken not to cytologically over-diagnose cases of pancreatitis. On the whole, cytology proved to be a valuable method for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma; it provided the highest rate of positive results in comparison with other modern clinical diagnostic methods. Furthermore, cytology may improve the diagnostic results even in those cases with clinically negative or merely suspicious findings. FNA punctures of the pancreas produced no serious complications in this series.