Role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study of nine cases

Objective

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is an established first‐line procedure in the management of solid and cystic pancreatic masses. Lymphoma is an uncommon diagnosis in EUS‐FNA of the pancreas, and it is more common for such a diagnosis to be because of secondary involvement of the pancreas by a lymphoproliferative disorder than for this to represent isolated primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL). We present the clinical, EUS and cytological features of these lesions.

Material and methods

After obtaining approval from our Institutional Review Board (IRB), nine cases of lymphoma diagnosed on EUS‐FNA at a tertiary care cancer centre over a period of 8 years from 2008 to 2016 were retrieved from our endoscopy and pathology archives. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) was carried out by a trained cytopathologist in all these cases. Cell blocks were available in seven cases, and immunophenotyping was performed on cell blocks using the immunoperoxidase method. Flow cytometry was performed in two cases.

Results

The most frequent site of involvement was the head of the pancreas (n=5, 55.6%). Four out of nine cases were diagnosed as PPL (44.4%). Five cases were diagnosed as lymphoma secondarily involving the pancreas (55.6%). The most frequent diagnosis was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (n=6, 66.7%), followed by Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2, 22.2%) and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (n=1, 11.1%).

Conclusion

EUS‐FNA in experienced hands is a valuable diagnostic modality, in conjunction with ROSE, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, in the diagnosis and sub‐typing of both primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma.     

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment,diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract1

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has been proved to be safe, efficient and reliable in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This study evaluated specimen adequacy, diagnostic criteria of various pancreatic neoplasms and contamination from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods: EUS‐guided FNA of the pancreas and subsequent surgical resections performed at the University of California Irvine Medical Center during February 1996–October 2000 were retrospectively selected. Modified Papanicolaou staining method was used for immediate evaluation and cell block prepared. Results: A total of 267 cases were available for review, including 147 (55.1%) positive/suspicious, 10 (3.7%) atypical, 96 (36.0%) negative and 14 (5.2%) unsatisfactory cases. Eighty‐six (58.5%) positive/suspicious cases had histological confirmation and 12 (8.3%) had lymph node or distant metastases by cytology. Three atypical, two negative, and two unsatisfactory cases proved to have adenocarcinoma. Contamination from duodenum, stomach or pancreas was found in 77 positive/suspicious, three atypical and 90 negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were 94.6%, 100%, 95.6%, 100%, 82% respectively. Conclusions: EUS FNA is efficient and accurate in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms in adequate samples. Contamination from the GI tract should be well recognized to avoid misinterpretation.     

Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours

Y. Kopelman, S. Marmor, I. Ashkenazi and Z. Fireman
Value of EUS‐FNA cytological preparations compared with cell block sections in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumours Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is performed in order to achieve a definite tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This in turn is a guide to the appropriate treatment for the patient. Tissue samples collected by the same needle for cytological preparations and cell block histological sections (often referred to as FNA‐cytology and FNA–biopsy, respectively) are handled differently. The specific contribution of each of these tests was evaluated. Methods: One hundred and two consecutive patients underwent EUS‐FNA while being investigated for pancreatic solid lesions. Diagnosis was made by cytology, cell block sections or both. The diagnosis was confirmed by clinical outcome. Results: Male/female ratio was 61/41. Mean age was 65 ± 12 years (range, 22–94). Mean lesion size was 3.1 ± 1.8 cm (range, 0.6–10 cm); 68% were >2 cm and 75% were located in the pancreatic head. The average number of needle passes was two (range, 1–4 passes). Final tissue diagnosis was malignant in 66 (65%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 73%, 94% and 81%, respectively, for cytology alone, and 63%, 100% and 78%, for cell blocks alone. Eighty‐two patients (80%) had cytology and cell blocks, which matched in 64 (78%) patients. EUS‐FNA results that relied on both techniques had 84% sensitivity, 94% specificity and 88% accuracy. Cytology revealed 13 malignancies not diagnosed on cell blocks, while cell blocks revealed five malignancies not diagnosed by cytology. Malignant lesions were more common in men; they were larger in size and located in the pancreatic head. Conclusion: EUS‐FNA cytology was more sensitive than cell blocks but less specific for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. The two methods are complementary and implementing both improves the diagnostic value of EUS‐FNA.     

Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity

Background: Using cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart, we address two questions: (i) Over time, how will an EUS‐FNA (endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration) service maintain an acceptable non‐diagnostic rate defined as technical failures, unsatisfactory specimens and atypical and suspicious diagnoses? (ii) Over time, how will EUS‐FNA maintain acceptable diagnostic errors (false‐positives plus false‐negative diagnosis)? Methods: The study included all consecutive patients who underwent EUS‐FNA at our institution from July 2000 to October 2003 and were followed up until December 2004. Using a simple spread sheet, we designed CUSUM charts and used them to track trends and assess performance at a preset acceptable rate of 10% and a preset unacceptable rate of 15% for non‐diagnostic rate and diagnostic errors. We assessed all cases collectively and then in groups defined by site, size and cytopathologist. Results: Of 876 patients undergoing EUS‐FNA, 83 (9.5%) had non‐diagnostic results: 43 (51%) of these diagnoses were ‘atypical’, 27(33%) were ‘suspicious for malignancy’, eight (10%) were ‘insufficient material for diagnosis’ and five (6%) were ‘technical failure’. In 585 cases with adequate follow up, there were 26 (6.3%) diagnostic errors: three (0.5%) were false positive and 23 (3.1) were false negative. The overall CUSUM charts for both non‐diagnostic rate and for diagnostic error rate start with a small period of learning then cross to a significantly acceptable level at case numbers 121 and 97 respectively. Our diagnostic performance was better in lymph nodes than in the pancreas and other organs and was not significantly different for lesions ≤25 mm compared with lesion >25 mm in diameter. Performance was better for pathologists with prior experience than for pathologists without experience. Conclusion: In the current climate of proficiency testing, error tracking and competence evaluation, there is a great potential for the use of CUSUM charts to assess procedure failure and error tracking in quality control programs, particularly when a new procedure such as EUS‐FNA is introduced in the laboratory. Additionally, the method can be used to assess trainee competency and to track the proficiency of practicing cytologists.     

Value of the cytologic analysis of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinomas

Between 1982 and 1986, 410 preoperative percutaneous fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of the pancreas were performed on 316 patients clinically suspected of having a malignant pancreatic tumor. Of 58 patients with pancreatic carcinomas subsequently confirmed by histologic investigation, the FNA biopsy yielded a cytologically positive diagnosis of carcinoma in 39 cases (67.2%) and suspicious findings in another 5 cases (8.6%). In 14 cases of malignancy (24.1%), the FNA puncture failed to sample material from the tumor; hence, the cytologic evaluation yielded false-negative results. Of 21 patients with inflammatory disorders of the pancreas, cytologically suspicious cells were observed in 5 cases (23.8%); in none of those 5 cases did the histologic examination show any evidence of carcinoma. This indicates that caution should be taken not to cytologically over-diagnose cases of pancreatitis. On the whole, cytology proved to be a valuable method for the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma; it provided the highest rate of positive results in comparison with other modern clinical diagnostic methods. Furthermore, cytology may improve the diagnostic results even in those cases with clinically negative or merely suspicious findings. FNA punctures of the pancreas produced no serious complications in this series.     

Diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in HIV-infected patients with lymphadenopathy

reid a. j. c., miller r. f. and kocjan g. i. (1998) Cytopathology 9, 230–239
Diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in HIV-infected patients with lymphadenopathy
Sixty-five FNA cytology procedures were performed on lymph nodes in 52 HIV⁺ patients. Cervical lymph nodes were the commonest site of FNA cytology investigation (54%). The diagnoses were persistent generalized lymphadenopathy (38%), infection (17%), and malignancy (11%). Diagnosis could not be rendered in 25% of FNA cytology due to inadequate sampling. Of those with infection, mycobacterial disease was the commonest cause (91%), the diagnosis of which was enhanced by concurrent microbiological examination. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was the commonest malignancy. Sixteen lymph node FNA cytologies had subsequent tissue biopsy. There were two false-positive and four false-negative FNA cytologies. FNA cytology in HIV⁺ patients is most useful in the diagnosis of infection, obviating the need for tissue biopsy and allowing prompt initiation of treatment.     

New red blood cell lysing fixative for use in fine needle aspiration and fluid cytology

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new red blood cell (RBC) lysing fixative, Devine's lysing solution (DLS), that increases the diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fluid cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty bloody FNA cases were fixed with either DLS or 95% ethanol, and the ability to render a diagnosis on these materials was analyzed. DLS was compared to the red cell lysing fixative CytoRich Red (CRR) (TriPath Care Technologies, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in its ability to lyse RBCs by mixing human RBCs with the U266 multiple myeloma cell line. DLS was compared to CRR in its ability to suitably preserve materials for Papanicolaou and immunocytochemical analysis. RESULTS: Comparison of DLS with 95% ethanol fixation in 20 bloody FNA cases prepared in duplicate showed that DLS reduced from 17 to 3 the number of cases that had RBCs obscuring > or = 25% of the diagnostic material. In 3 cases, DLS enabled the rendering of a definitive diagnosis of malignancy, which could not be made on the ethanol-fixed material. DLS was compared to CRR, and both fixatives were similarly effective at lysing RBCs, preserving the cellular morphology of diagnostic cells in FNA and fluid cytology, and preserving cells for use in immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: DLS increases the visualization of diagnostic cellular material when compared to ethanol fixation. DLS is comparable to CRR in RBC lysing ability, diagnostic cell preservation and preservation of materials for immunocytochemistry.     

Molecular testing of BRAF,RAS and TERT on thyroid FNAs with indeterminate cytology improves diagnostic accuracy

Objective

Liquid‐based (LB)‐FNA is widely recognized as a reliable diagnostic method to evaluate thyroid nodules. However, up to 30% of LB‐FNA remain indeterminate according to the Bethesda system. Use of molecular biomarkers has been recommended to improve its pathological accuracy but implementation of these tests in clinical practice may be difficult. Here, we evaluated feasibility and performance of molecular profiling in routine practice by testing LB‐FNA for BRAF, N/HRAS and TERT mutations.

Methods

We studied a large prospective cohort of 326 cases, including 61 atypia of undetermined significance, 124 follicular neoplasms, 72 suspicious for malignancy and 69 malignant cases. Diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed by histology on paired surgical specimen.

Results

Mutated LB‐FNAs were significantly associated with malignancy regardless of the cytological classification. Overall sensitivity was 60% and specificity 89%. Importantly, in atypia of undetermined significance and follicular neoplasm patients undergoing surgery according to the Bethesda guidelines, negative predictive values were 85.4% and 90% respectively. TERT promoter mutation was rare but very specific for malignancy (5.5%) suggesting that it could be of interest in patients with indeterminate cytology.

Conclusions

Mutation profiling can be successfully performed on thyroid LB‐FNA without any dedicated sample in a pathology laboratory. It is an easy way to improve diagnostic accuracy of routine LB‐FNA and may help to better select patients for surgery and to avoid unnecessary thyroidectomies.

     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid gland diseases

From 1982 to 1987, 2,433 lesions of the thyroid gland in 1,796 patients were examined by fine needle aspiration (FNA). Cytopathology classified 66.91% of the aspirates as benign, 10.76% as thyroiditis, 4.89% as suspected (unspecified) neoplasia, 1.31% as positive for malignancy and 16.11% (392) as unsatisfactory. The histologic diagnoses in 257 cases were compared with cytologic diagnoses to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology of thyroid lesions, yielding a sensitivity of 71.43%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 95.09%. This data strongly supports thyroid FNA as an important preoperative diagnostic tool. Follicular carcinomas were difficult to cytologically differentiate from nonmalignant follicular neoplasms, and papillary thyroid carcinomas less than 2 cm in diameter in elderly patients were frequently misdiagnosed or diagnosed only as "suspect lesion."     

Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules

A. Fassina, M. Corradin, D. Zardo, R. Cappellesso, F. Corbetti and M. Fassan
Role and accuracy of rapid on‐site evaluation of CT‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology of lung nodules Objective: To prospectively investigate the role of trans‐thoracic fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and the value of rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) in the clinical management of patients with pulmonary nodules/masses. Computed tomography (CT)‐guided FNA is commonly employed for the diagnosis of lung lesions although its position in the diagnostic work‐up is still a matter of debate. Methods: We reviewed 311 patients (211 males and 100 females, mean age 69.5 years) admitted to the University of Padova from 2004 to 2008, correlating the results of cytology with the available histological findings obtained from biopsies, surgery or autopsy. Results: Smears were adequate in 305 cases (98%) and inadequate in six (2%); a diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 263 cases (86.2%); 39 cases (12.8%) were classified as non‐malignant; and three cases (1%) were classified as suspect for malignancy. When correlated with histology, FNA with ROSE discriminated malignant versus non‐malignant lesions (Cohen’s kappa 0.78), with three false negatives (sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 100%). Moreover, a satisfactory overall agreement of 71.4% was achieved in differentiating the cancer histological types. Pneumothorax occurred in 13 cases, haemoptysis in four, and chest pain in three. A single aspiration was sufficient in 79.6% of patients; two aspirations were needed in 17.4% and three in 3%. The low complication rate was related to the limited number of aspirations needed due to ROSE. Conclusions: FNA with ROSE is a safe and useful tool in the diagnostic work‐up of lung cancer patients, with no contraindications to its use as the first diagnostic procedure for all patients with peripheral lung lesions. FNA with ROSE should be reconsidered in the guidelines for diagnosing and managing lung cancer.     

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma

trovik c. s., bauer h. c. f., brosjö o., skoog l. and söderlund v. (1998) Cytopathology 9, 320–328
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma
We have used FNA cytology to diagnose suspected local recurrences of soft tissue sarcoma. Since 1991, a total of 95 FNA cytologies were performed on 86 patients. There were 47 local recurrences, of which 44 were diagnosed correctly by FNA cytology; one biopsy was inconclusive, and two lesions were incorrectly assessed as benign. Thirty-nine patients proved to have benign lesions in the scar area examined cytologically on 50 occasions. None of the specimens was regarded as malignant, but in four cases FNA cytology was inconclusive. Overall, there were 5% inconclusive cytological biopsies, 0% falsely malignant and 5% falsely benign. The inconclusive and false-negative cytological diagnoses had no important clinical consequences. FNA biopsy provides a simple means of diagnosing local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma.     

The role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of lymphoma

The accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for the diagnosis of lymphoma and other hematolymphoid malignancies was investigated by a review of 158 FNA specimens from 143 patients. Patients included in the study had either a diagnosis of a hematolymphoid malignancy by FNA cytology or a biopsy diagnosis of lymphoma that was preceded by FNA cytology. Biopsy specimens were obtained from 85% of the patients. Of the 158 needle aspirates, 118 (75%) were diagnosed as lymphoma, 13 (8%) as suspicious of lymphoma, 8 (5%) as myelomas, 3 (2%) as leukemias, 12 (8%) as positive for malignancy and 4 (2%) as negative for malignancy. Two of the 118 needle aspirates diagnosed as lymphoma were false positives while 3 of 13 diagnosed as suspicious for lymphoma were found to be benign. Overall, there were four false negatives. Morphologic subclassification of the lymphomas, originally attempted for 60 needle aspirates, was identical to the histologic subclassification in 51 cases (85%). FNA cytology provided the initial diagnosis of a hematolymphoid malignancy in 51% of the cases and allowed the documentation of recurrent disease in 49%. The results demonstrate the usefulness of FNA cytology for the diagnosis and management of patients with lymphoma.     

Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry

A. Stacchini, P. Carucci, D. Pacchioni, G. Accinelli, A. Demurtas, S. Aliberti, M. Bosco, M. Bruno, A. Balbo Mussetto, M. Rizzetto, G. Bussolati and C. De Angelis
Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry Objective: Although endoscopic ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is rapidly becoming the preferred diagnostic approach for the sampling and diagnosis of gastrointestinal and mediastinal malignancies, there are limited data as to its use in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective evaluation of the performance of EUS‐guided FNA combined with flow cytometry (FC) as a tool to improve overall sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Methods: Of 1560 patients having EUS‐guided FNA during the period of the study, a total of 56 patients were evaluated by cytology with FC after EUS‐FNA. There was adequate material to perform FC analysis for all but one case. Results: EUS‐FNA‐FC gave a diagnosis of lymphoma in 11 cases and of reactive lymphadenopathy in 20. A specific histological type was defined by FC alone in eight cases. The remaining cases were diagnosed later by cytology and cell block sections: 13 carcinomas, nine granulomatous lymphadenopathies and one mediastinal extramedullary haematopoiesis. One case was considered only suspicious for lymphoma on cytology and FC but was not confirmed on molecular analysis and one had insufficient material for FC. Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of EUS‐FNA‐FC is a feasible and highly accurate method, which may be used for the diagnosis and subtyping of deep‐seated lymphoma, providing a significant improvement to cytomorphology alone both for diagnosis and treatment planning, as long as immunocytochemistry is available for non‐lymphoma cases.     

Posters. P17 Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard investigation in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Published data suggest an overall accuracy rate of 75% 1 in the detection of thyroid malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology in detection of thyroid malignancy in our surgical unit. Methods Between 1989–2002, 144 patients who underwent thyroid resection by single consultant surgeon and who had pre‐operative FNA were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pre‐operative FNA results were compared with definitive histological diagnosis following thyroid resection. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed using aspirate and non‐aspirate techniques on each thyroid swelling. The cytological sample was assessed by a single cytopathologist and was classified as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, neoplastic, suspicious or indeterminate. The histology was classified as non‐neoplastic (benign) and neoplastic (malignant). Results Fine needle aspiration cytology analysis revealed 94 (13.88%) non‐neoplastic, six (65.27%) neoplastic and 20 (4.16%) suspicious aspirates. Twenty (13.88%) samples were inadequate and four (2.77%) samples were indeterminate. Histological analysis showed 118 (81.94%) benign, 26 (18.05%) malignant specimens. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of 52.6%, 86.6% and 79.1%, respectively for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Conclusion The results are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology in our hands is accurate investigation for pre‐operative diagnosis for the detection of thyroid malignancy.     

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of testicular germ cell tumours; a 10-year experience in a community hospital

garcía-solano j., sánchez-sánchez c., montalbán-romero s., sola-pérez j. and pérez-guillermo m. (1998) Cytopathology 9, 248–262
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of testicular germ cell tumours; a 10-year experience in a community hospital
A retrospective reappraisal is made of the smears of 29 testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT) studied by FNA in which both orchiectomy specimens and histologic diagnoses were available. In 22 cases (75.86%) the yield was sufficient and contained cells suitable for cytologic diagnosis; in these 22 cases a diagnosis of malignancy was reached. In four cases (13.79%) the yield was sparse and diagnostic cells were partially obscured by haemorrhage and necrosis; these cases were categorized as suspicious of malignancy. In three cases (10.34%) the yield was not suitable for cytologic evaluation because haemorrhage and necrosis hampered evaluation of diagnostic cells. The cytologic findings that enable a reliable diagnosis of TGCT are described and those cytologic features that may lead the less experienced cytopathologist into an erroneous diagnosis are discussed. Pure TGCT can be confidently diagnosed with FNA and mixed TGCT can be successfully diagnosed, although it is difficult to recognize every cytologic subtype observed in the histologic sections. Despite the advantages of FNA for the prompt diagnosis of TGCT, FNA can not fully replace the histologic diagnosis and should rather be considered as a helpful tool in the work-up of testicular tumours.     

Breast fine needle aspiration cytology: a review of current practice in Australasia

M. C. Cummings, B. A. Waters and P. K. O’Rourke Breast fine needle aspiration cytology: a review of current practice in Australasia Aims: To investigate breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in Australasia, in terms of laboratory demographics, specimens received and quality control (QC). Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all laboratories enrolled in the FNA module of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Cytopathology Quality Assurance Program (QAP), requesting information about specimens received in a 3‐month period in 2001 and in 2008. Results: Responses were received from 81/180 laboratories in 2001 and from 94/200 in 2008. The mean number of cases per 3 months was 137 in 2001 and 141 in 2008 and for the 42 laboratories responding on both occasions, the mean number of cases declined from 191 to 149 (P = 0.001). The mean percentage of malignant cases was 11.7% in 2001 and 10.5% in 2008 and the mean percentages of unsatisfactory rates were 21.7% and 25.2%, respectively; 43.2% of laboratories in 2001 and 40.4% in 2008 reported fewer than 50 cases for the 3‐month period. The unsatisfactory rate was inversely proportional to the number of cases received. Most QC (69.1% in 2001, 71.3% in 2008) was carried out by correlation with any later histology. With no histology available, 35.8% of laboratories in 2001 and 48.9% in 2008 did no further follow‐up. Follow‐up of all diagnostic categories increased from 30.9% in 2001 to 44% in 2008. Conclusions: Breast FNA cytology is still actively undertaken in Australasia, but numbers have declined. Unsatisfactory rates have reached the Australian recommended upper limit and are inversely proportional to the total number of cases received. Overall QC measures are unchanged and consideration of a review of breast FNA guidelines is suggested.     

Morphologic and immunocytochemical evaluation of 220 fine needle aspirates of malignant lymphoma and lymphoid hyperplasia

A total of 220 fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens from 212 patients with clinically suspected or previously histologically confirmed lymphoma were evaluated by cytology in conjunction with immunophenotyping analysis of the aspirate; the results were compared with the histologic diagnosis made on previous or current accessions of lymph node or extranodal tissue. Smears of the aspirates were stained with the Diff-Quik and Papanicolaou stains while immunoperoxidase staining using antibodies against kappa and lambda immunoglobulin light chains and Leu-4 was routinely performed on Cytospin preparations. Where indicated, additional marker studies (including T-200, Leu-1, Leu-2a, Leu-3a + 3b, Leu-M1, B1, Leu-12, IgM, CALLA and TdT) were performed. For the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, specimens were classified by the cytologic characteristics of the neoplastic cells according to the International Working Formulation scheme. The combination of cytologic smears and immunoperoxidase studies resulted in a diagnosis of lymphoma in 173 cases (79%). The remaining aspirates were interpreted as suspicious for lymphoma (7%), benign (10%) or inadequate for diagnosis (4%). Of the 15 suspicious aspirates, 5 proved to be Hodgkin's disease and 2 to be T-cell lymphoma by subsequent biopsy. The cause of failure in the nine inadequate aspirates were necrosis (3 cases), sclerosis (2 cases) and faulty technique (4 cases). In the cases that had concurrent tissue biopsies, no false-positive diagnoses were rendered. These results indicate that FNA used in association with immunocytochemistry is a reliable tool for establishing the diagnosis and classification of the majority of cases of lymphoma. Optimal immunoglobulin light-chain ratios for defining monoclonality in FNA specimens of B-cell lymphomas are proposed.     

Finnish cytotechnologists' views on the competencies of newly graduated biomedical scientists in clinical cytology

Objective

This study asked 40 cytotechnologists for their views on the competencies of newly graduated biomedical scientists in clinical cytology during the national conference of the Finnish Association of Cytotechnologists in November 2015.

Methods

The questionnaire mainly consisted of statements that were scored on a five‐point Likert‐scale, where 1 was not important and 5 was very important. It covered five sections of clinical cytology: sampling and techniques, gynaecological screening, non‐gynaecological screening, safety and quality management, and miscellaneous.

Results

Of the 40 delegates approached to complete the questionnaire, 37 (92.5%) agreed. Respondents felt that important sampling and technique competencies were specimen fixation, with a mean score of 4.9 out of 5.0, types of specimens (4.7), Papanicolaou smear collection (4.7), Papanicolaou smear request information (4.7) and evaluation of specimen sufficiency (4.6). Less important competencies were examining FNAs (2.0) and nasopharyngeal specimens (2.2). The respondents had many expectations about how education in cytology could be developed, for example more theoretical lessons, more practice in microscope use, and consistent criteria for training and cooperation between cytology laboratories and universities of applied sciences.

Conclusions

The cytotechnologists who took part in our survey expected newly graduated biomedical scientists to have basic competencies in cytology. These were sampling and techniques, laboratory safety and quality management, specimen adequacy and identifying normal cells taken during gynaecological screening. They were also keen to develop education in cytology.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA

S. Zhang, D. V. S. DeFrias, R. Alasadi and R. Nayar
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) has become widely accepted as an effective modality for obtaining tissue for primary diagnosis and staging. We have been using EUS‐FNA since July 2001 and herein we summarize our experience over a 5‐year period. Methods: A computer‐based search for in‐house EUS‐FNA was performed in the pathology database from July 2001 to October 2006. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS‐FNA, the cytology diagnosis was compared with the surgical follow‐up. Results: A total of 951 EUS‐FNAs were performed during the study period and included 279 pancreatic solid lesions, 186 pancreatic cyst lesions, 249 lymph node aspirations, 111 gastrointestinal (GI) tract submucosal lesions, and 126 miscellaneous lesions. EUS‐FNA had a very high sensitivity and accuracy for solid pancreatic lesions (94.7 and 97.7%, respectively), low sensitivity and accuracy but high specificity (47, 64.8 and 95%, respectively) for cystic lesions. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic (CEA) levels were significantly higher in mucinous neoplasms than non‐neoplastic cysts. EUS‐FNA also had very high sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic carcinoma in lymph nodes (95 and 100%, respectively). GI submucosal spindle cell tumours were further classified with immunohistochemical stains performed either on a cell block or a core biopsy obtained via EUS guidance. Conclusions: EUS‐FNA has a very high sensitivity and accuracy for pancreatic solid lesions, but the sensitivity for cystic lesions is generally low. Cyst fluid chemical analysis for CEA is helpful, but the overlap between mucinous neoplasm and non‐neoplastic cysts is significant. Recognizing GI contamination is important and immunohistochemical stains are useful for GI submucosal spindle cell lesions.