The use of signalling pathway inhibitors and chromatin modifiers for enhancing pluripotency

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells have been isolated from a limited number of species. The new advances with inducing pluripotency in somatic cells have resulted in the generation of pluripotent stem cells while circumventing the need for embryos. In this review we describe the main signalling pathways involved in maintaining pluripotency and inducing differentiation. Inhibition of the signalling pathways involved in differentiation enhances the derivation and cultivation of pluripotent stem cells. Furthermore, we discuss the use of chromatin modifiers to maintain an open chromatin state which is characteristic of pluripotent stem cells, to facilitate the derivation of pluripotent cell lines.     

Interaction of ZFPIP with PBX1 is crucial for proper expression of neural genetic markers during Xenopus development

ZFPIP/Zfp462 has been recently identified as a new vertebrate zinc finger encoding gene whose product interacts with Pbx1. Previous work indicates that ZFPIP is maternally expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and plays a key role during the cleavage phase of embryogenesis. This early expression is followed by a zygotic expression which overlaps with the neural Pbx1 expression pattern, suggesting an interaction between these two partners during Xenopus neurogenesis. In order to test the physiological interaction between ZFPIP and Pbx1, we carried out a dominant negative assay in which the Pbx1 interacting domain of ZFPIP (ZFPIPp) was overexpressed in Xenopus laevis embryos. We observed that ZFPIPp ectopic expression led to abnormal en2 and N‐cam expression patterns, whereas krox‐20 expression was not affected. Furthermore, we showed that while ZFPIPp alone was localized in the nucleus of Cos‐7 cells, additional expression of Pbx1 induced a location of ZFPIPp at the perinuclear region of the cells. These overall data suggest that ZFPIP and Pbx1 could be partners and cooperate in the regulation of essential neural genes during Xenopus development.     

Expression patterns of germ line specific genes in mouse and human pluripotent stem cells are associated with regulation of ground and primed state of pluripotency

One of the main criteria of pluripotency is ability of cell lines to differentiate into the germ line. Pluripotent stem cell lines in ground state of pluripotency differ from the lines in primed state by their ability to give rise to the mature gametes. To understand molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of different states of pluripotency we investigated the expression patterns of germ line specific genes in different type pluripotent stem cells and mouse and human embryonic teratocarcinoma cells. We found that pluripotent stem cells in vitro, in blastocyst and gonocytes at stage E13.5 had similar expression patterns in contrast to the epiblast cells at stage E6.5. Quantitative real time PCR analysis showed that Vasa/Ddx4 expression in mouse and human embryonic stem cells was significantly lower than in blastocyst and gonocytes. Moreover, Vasa/Ddx4 and E-ras expression was significantly higher in mouse embryonic stem cells than in human embryonic stem cells. Our analysis of germ line specific gene expression in differentiating mouse embryonic stem and embryonic germ cells as well as in mouse embryonic teratocarcinoma cells maintained under conditions promoting cell reprogramming from primed to ground state of pluripotency (2i + LIF) revealed that only pluripotent stem cells are able to regulate the expression level of Oct4 and Vasa/Ddx4 and restore initial ground state, while in embryonic teratocarcinoma cells the expression level of these genes remained unchanged. We suggest that expression patterns of germ lines specific genes, in particular of Vasa/Ddx4, can underlie the regulation of ground and primed states of pluripotency.     

Induced pluripotent stem cells’ self-renewal and pluripotency is maintained by a bovine granulosa cell line-conditioned medium

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are a promising type of stem cells, comparable to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in terms of self-renew and pluripotency, generated by reprogramming somatic cells. These cells are an attractive approach to supply patient-specific pluripotent cells, for producing in vitro models of disease, drug discovery, toxicology and potentially treating degenerative disease circumventing immune rejection. In spite of the great advance since iPSCs’ establishment, their obtention and propagation is an increasing area of great interest.In a recent work, we have shown that the conditioned medium from a bovine granulosa cell line (BGC-CM) is able to preserve the basic properties of mESCs. Therefore, based on our previous results and the reported resemblance between iPSCs and ESCs, we hypothesized that BGC-CM could provide a favorable context to culturing iPSCs. In this work, we have reprogrammed mouse embryonic fibroblasts obtaining iPSC lines, and showed that they can be propagated in BGC-CM while maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency, evidenced by expression of specific gene markers and capability of in vitro and in vivo differentiation to cell types from the three germ layers. We believe that these findings may provide a novel context to propagate iPSCs to study the molecular mechanisms involved in self-renewal and pluripotency.     

DNA and chromatin modification networks distinguish stem cell pluripotent ground states

Pluripotent stem cells are capable of differentiating into all cell types of the body and therefore hold tremendous promise for regenerative medicine. Despite their widespread use in laboratories across the world, a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate the pluripotent state is currently lacking. Mouse embryonic (mESC) and epiblast (mEpiSC) stem cells are two closely related classes of pluripotent stem cells, derived from distinct embryonic tissues. Although both mESC and mEpiSC are pluripotent, these cell types show important differences in their properties suggesting distinct pluripotent ground states. To understand the molecular basis of pluripotency, we analyzed the nuclear proteomes of mESCs and mEpiSCs to identify protein networks that regulate their respective pluripotent states. Our study used label-free LC-MS/MS to identify and quantify 1597 proteins in embryonic and epiblast stem cell nuclei. Immunoblotting of a selected protein subset was used to confirm that key components of chromatin regulatory networks are differentially expressed in mESCs and mEpiSCs. Specifically, we identify differential expression of DNA methylation, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and nucleosome remodeling networks in mESC and mEpiSC nuclei. This study is the first comparative study of protein networks in cells representing the two distinct, pluripotent states, and points to the importance of DNA and chromatin modification processes in regulating pluripotency. In addition, by integrating our data with existing pluripotency networks, we provide detailed maps of protein networks that regulate pluripotency that will further both the fundamental understanding of pluripotency as well as efforts to reliably control the differentiation of these cells into functional cell fates.     

Histone h1 depletion impairs embryonic stem cell differentiation

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are known to possess a relatively open chromatin structure; yet, despite efforts to characterize the chromatin signatures of ESCs, the role of chromatin compaction in stem cell fate and function remains elusive. Linker histone H1 is important for higher-order chromatin folding and is essential for mammalian embryogenesis. To investigate the role of H1 and chromatin compaction in stem cell pluripotency and differentiation, we examine the differentiation of embryonic stem cells that are depleted of multiple H1 subtypes. H1c/H1d/H1e triple null ESCs are more resistant to spontaneous differentiation in adherent monolayer culture upon removal of leukemia inhibitory factor. Similarly, the majority of the triple-H1 null embryoid bodies (EBs) lack morphological structures representing the three germ layers and retain gene expression signatures characteristic of undifferentiated ESCs. Furthermore, upon neural differentiation of EBs, triple-H1 null cell cultures are deficient in neurite outgrowth and lack efficient activation of neural markers. Finally, we discover that triple-H1 null embryos and EBs fail to fully repress the expression of the pluripotency genes in comparison with wild-type controls and that H1 depletion impairs DNA methylation and changes of histone marks at promoter regions necessary for efficiently silencing pluripotency gene Oct4 during stem cell differentiation and embryogenesis. In summary, we demonstrate that H1 plays a critical role in pluripotent stem cell differentiation, and our results suggest that H1 and chromatin compaction may mediate pluripotent stem cell differentiation through epigenetic repression of the pluripotency genes.     

Directed differentiation of embryonic P19 cells and neural stem cells into neural lineage on conducting PEDOT–PEG and ITO glass substrates

Differentiation of pluripotent and lineage restricted stem cells such as neural stem cells (NSCs) was studied on conducting substrates of various nature without perturbation of the genome with exogenous genetic material or chemical stimuli. Primary mouse adult neural stem cells (NSCs) and P19 pluripotent embryonal (P19 EC) carcinoma cells were used. Expression levels of neuronal markers β-III-tubulin and neurofilament were evaluated by immunochemistry and flow cytometry. It was shown that the ability of the substrate to induce differentiation directly correlated with its conductivity. Conducting substrates (conducting oxides or doped π-conjugated organic polymers) with different morphology, structure, and conductivity mechanisms all promoted differentiation of NSC and P19 cells into neuronal lineage to a similar degree without use of additional factors such as poly-l-ornithine coating or retinoic acid, as verified by their morphology and upregulation of the neuronal markers but not astrocyte marker GFAP. However, substrates with low conductance below ca. 10^?4 S cm^?2 did not show this ability. Morphology of differentiating cells was visualized by atomic force microscopy. NSCs cells increased β-III-tubulin expression by 95% and P19 cells by over 30%. Our results suggest that the substrate conductivity is a key factor governing the cell fate. Differentiation of P19 cells into neuronal lineage on conducting substrates was attributed to downregualtion of Akt signaling pathway and increase in expression of dual oxidase 1 (DUOX 1).     

Pluripotency,Differentiation, and Reprogramming: A Gene Expression Dynamics Model with Epigenetic Feedback Regulation

Embryonic stem cells exhibit pluripotency: they can differentiate into all types of somatic cells. Pluripotent genes such as Oct4 and Nanog are activated in the pluripotent state, and their expression decreases during cell differentiation. Inversely, expression of differentiation genes such as Gata6 and Gata4 is promoted during differentiation. The gene regulatory network controlling the expression of these genes has been described, and slower-scale epigenetic modifications have been uncovered. Although the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells is normally irreversible, reprogramming of cells can be experimentally manipulated to regain pluripotency via overexpression of certain genes. Despite these experimental advances, the dynamics and mechanisms of differentiation and reprogramming are not yet fully understood. Based on recent experimental findings, we constructed a simple gene regulatory network including pluripotent and differentiation genes, and we demonstrated the existence of pluripotent and differentiated states from the resultant dynamical-systems model. Two differentiation mechanisms, interaction-induced switching from an expression oscillatory state and noise-assisted transition between bistable stationary states, were tested in the model. The former was found to be relevant to the differentiation process. We also introduced variables representing epigenetic modifications, which controlled the threshold for gene expression. By assuming positive feedback between expression levels and the epigenetic variables, we observed differentiation in expression dynamics. Additionally, with numerical reprogramming experiments for differentiated cells, we showed that pluripotency was recovered in cells by imposing overexpression of two pluripotent genes and external factors to control expression of differentiation genes. Interestingly, these factors were consistent with the four Yamanaka factors, Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc, which were necessary for the establishment of induced pluripotent stem cells. These results, based on a gene regulatory network and expression dynamics, contribute to our wider understanding of pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming of cells, and they provide a fresh viewpoint on robustness and control during development.