Detection of Grapevine Viruses in Poland

During a 3‐year study, grapevines from 23 vineyards in Poland were surveyed for virus diseases and tested to determine the prevalence of the most economically important viruses by RT‐PCR. The rate of positive samples was 2.2% for grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 1 (GLRaV‐1), 1.9% for grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2 (GLRaV‐2), 1.5% grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 3 (GLRaV‐3), 1.9% for grapevine virus A (GVA), 0.2% for grapevine virus B (GVB), 0.2% for grapevine virus E (GVE), 0.65% for grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), 20.4% for grapevine fleck virus (GFkV) and 71.9% for grapevine rupestris stem pitting‐associated virus (GRSPaV). These viruses were found to occur as single or mixed infections of different combinations in individual grapevines. The overall viral infection rate in the surveyed grapevines was 82.6%. GRSPaV is the most widely distributed virus of all the viruses currently detected in the region. DNA sequencing confirmed the identification of the viruses in selected samples, and analysis indicated that the Polish isolates shared a close molecular identity with the corresponding isolates in GenBank. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of GLRaV‐1, ‐2, ‐3, GVA, GVB, GVE, GFLV, GFkV and GRSPaV in Poland.     

Transmission of Grapevine virus A and Grapevine leafroll‐associated viruses 1 and 3 by Planococcus ficus and Planococcus citri fed on mixed‐infected plants

The Grapevine virus A (GVA) and Grapevine leafroll‐associated viruses 1 and 3 (GLRaV‐1 and GLRaV‐3) are associated with grapevine diseases that induce severe reductions in yield and berry quality. These three viruses are known to coexist in both grapevine and insect vectors, but their cotransmission has been poorly characterised so far. This study investigates the acquisition and transmission of GLRaV‐1, GLRaV‐3 and GVA by Planococcus ficus and Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) following feeding on multiple‐infected plants. The retention and load of the three viruses in the two insect species were analysed. After feeding onto GVA, GLRaV‐1 and GLRaV‐3 mixed‐infected grapevines, nymphs of P. ficus and P. citri showed similar virus acquisition rates and retained low quantities of viruses until the third post‐acquisition day. Despite the similar acquisition patterns, the two vectors differed in transmission efficiency: P. ficus showed a higher efficiency in transmitting GVA and GLRaV‐3, whereas P. citri transmitted GLRaV‐1 more efficiently. When focusing on the virus cotransmission, it appears that GVA could be transmitted to grapevine without GLRaV‐1 and/or GLRaV‐3 and that the transmission of both GLRaVs could take place in the absence of GVA. This comparative study involving different viruses and vector species improves the current knowledge of the semi‐persistent transmission of these three viruses and contributes to the understanding of grapevine virus epidemiology.     

Incidence of Viruses and Nematode Vectors in Lebanese Vineyards

Surveys for virus diseases and nematode vectors were conducted in 95 commercial vineyards of four different Lebanese districts (Bekaa valley, Mount Lebanon, North and South Lebanon). Out of 915 randomly collected grapevine samples tested by ELISA, 511 (55.8%) were infected by one or more viruses. Grapevine virus A (30.9%) and Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 3 (23.7%) were the prevailing viruses, followed by Grapevine fleck virus (15.1%), Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 1 (10.6%) and Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2 (8.7%). Arabis mosaic virus was not found whereas Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) and Grapevine virus B were little represented. The most important Lebanese grapevine varieties, i.e. Maghdouchi, Tfeifihi and Beitamouni, had average infection rates between 70% and 87%, whereas varieties of foreign origin had a better sanitary status with the exception of cvs Cinsaut and Thompson (c. 83% infection). Grapevine rupestris stem pitting‐associated virus was detected in 79 of 90 (87.8%) samples tested by RT‐PCR and closteroviruses were recorded in seven of 70 (10%) vines tested. One of these viruses was identified as Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 5 by ELISA and partial genome sequencing. No nepoviruses other than GFLV were detected in any of 90 samples tested using three different sets of degenerate primers. Xiphinema index was found in 23 of 89 soil samples collected from vineyards, and in three of 15 samples collected primarily under fig trees in fields where no grapevines were grown.     

Occurrence and Distribution of Grapevine Leafroll-associated Viruses 1, 2, 3 and 7 in Turkey

Grapevines in central Anatolia region of Turkey were surveyed for the prevalence of grapevine leafroll viruses. The field study and collection of samples were conducted in nine major grapevine‐growing areas. Samples collected from 622 vines were tested for Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 1, 2, 3 and 7 (GLRaV‐1, ‐2, ‐3 and ‐7). According to diagnostic tests and surveys, 27 of 41 cultivars and 95 of 622 samples (15.27%) were found to be infected at least one virus. GLRaV‐1 (8.36%) was found to be the most frequently encountered virus associated with leafroll disease of grapes, followed by GLRaV‐3 (5.78%), GLRAV‐7 (3.86%) and GLRAV‐2 (2.41%).     

Nanobody‐mediated resistance to Grapevine fanleaf virus in plants

Since their discovery, single‐domain antigen‐binding fragments of camelid‐derived heavy‐chain‐only antibodies, also known as nanobodies (Nbs), have proven to be of outstanding interest as therapeutics against human diseases and pathogens including viruses, but their use against phytopathogens remains limited. Many plant viruses including Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), a nematode‐transmitted icosahedral virus and causal agent of fanleaf degenerative disease, have worldwide distribution and huge burden on crop yields representing billions of US dollars of losses annually, yet solutions to combat these viruses are often limited or inefficient. Here, we identified a Nb specific to GFLV that confers strong resistance to GFLV upon stable expression in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana and also in grapevine rootstock, the natural host of the virus. We showed that resistance was effective against a broad range of GFLV isolates independently of the inoculation method including upon nematode transmission but not against its close relative, Arabis mosaic virus. We also demonstrated that virus neutralization occurs at an early step of the virus life cycle, prior to cell‐to‐cell movement. Our findings will not only be instrumental to confer resistance to GFLV in grapevine, but more generally they pave the way for the generation of novel antiviral strategies in plants based on Nbs.     

First Report of the Occurrence of Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus‐5 in Turkish Vineyards

Surveys were made in the main grape growing region (Southeast Anatolia) of Turkey for the occurrence of Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus‐5 (GLRaV‐5). Plant samples with typical leafroll symptoms and mealybugs, Planococcus ficus (Signoret) were used for assessing the occurrence of GLRaV‐5 by RT‐PCR. A 272 bp band representing GLRaV‐5 infection was successfully detected in plants and mealybugs in some vineyards of the Southeast Anatolia region and the virus is the first time reported in Turkish vineyards.     

Serological Detection of Grapevine leafroll virus 2 Using an Antiserum Developed against the Recombinant Coat Protein†

Grapevine leafroll associated virus 2 (GLRaV 2) is one of the important components in the leafroll disease complex. The coat protein gene of GLRaV 2 was cloned into a protein expression vector pMAL‐c2x and the recombinant protein, consisting of the maltose binding protein (MBP) and GLRaV 2 coat protein (CP), was expressed in Escherichia coli. The recombinant MBP‐CP was used to raise a high quality antiserum. When used in Western blot analysis, the anti‐MBP‐CP antiserum produced specific reaction to the recombinant protein as well as to the viral coat protein of GLRaV 2. In Immunosorbent electron microscopy study, the anti‐MBP‐CP antibodies strongly decorated the GLRaV 2 virions. Using the newly developed antiserum, an indirect plate‐trapped antigen enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay method was developed and successfully implemented for virus detection. A field survey was conducted to evaluate the virus infection status by GLRaV 2 and GLRaV 3 using antibodies developed against their respective recombinant coat proteins.     

Diversity among Grapevine Leafroll-associated Virus 2 Isolates Detected by Heteroduplex Mobility Assay

Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2 (GLRaV‐2) was detected by serological and molecular analyses in several grapevine accessions of different varieties from Italian, Greek, French and Brazilian vineyards in a 2001–2002 survey. In order to study the genetic variability among GLRaV‐2 isolates in the open reading frame (ORF) coding the coat protein (CP), heteroduplex mobility assays were performed on 17 isolates and six strains used as reference. Eight diverse GLRaV‐2 variants were identified among the infected grapevines tested. The most common variant was found in the majority of the samples characterized; it was indistinguishable from the reference strains from the Semillon and Pinot noir 95 accessions. GLRaV‐2 variants found in Italian cvs Negro amaro and Vermentino were identical to the reference strain from cv. Muscat de Samos (Greece). Three other GLRaV‐2 variants from Southern and Central Italy were different from all the reference strains. A grapevine accession from Tuscany was found to contain two diverse GLRaV‐2 variants. None of the variants tested sample identical to the American strain H4 or the reference strains from cvs Chasselas 8386 (Switzerland) or Alphonse Lavallée 224 (France); the latter three accessions were different from one another. The estimated nucleotide homology in CP gene among 23 GLRaV‐2 isolates was in some cases <88%.     

Effects of Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 3 on the physiology in asymptomatic plants of Vitis vinifera

Grapevine leafroll disease is one of the most important viral diseases of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) worldwide. Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 3 (GLRaV‐3) is the most predominant virus species causing this disease. Therefore, it is important to identify GLRaV‐3 effects, especially in plants which do not systematically show visual symptoms. In this study, effects of GLRaV‐3 on grapevine physiology were evaluated in asymptomatic plants of Malvasía de Banyalbufar and Cabernet Sauvignon cvs. Absolute virus quantification was performed in order to determine the level of infection of the treatment. The net carbon dioxide (CO₂) assimilation (A_N) and electron transport rate (J_flux) were the main parameters affected by the virus. The A_N reduction in infected plants was attributed to restrictions in CO₂ diffusion caused by anatomical leaf changes and a reduction of Rubisco activity. Those effects were more evident in Malvasia de Banyalbufar plants. The reduction of A_N leads to a decrease in the total oxygen uptake rate by the activity of the cytochrome oxidase pathway, producing slight differences in plant growth. Therefore, even though no symptoms were expressed in the plants, the effects of the virus compromised the plant vital processes, showing the importance of early detection of the virus in order to fight against the infection.     

Thiopurine Prodrugs for Plant Chemotherapy Purposes

Thiopurine prodrugs are antiviral chemicals used in medical therapy whose mechanisms of action are associated with inhibition of purine biosynthesis. In terms of plant chemotherapy, previous research of 6‐mercaptopurine (MP) administration in tobacco tissue culture infected by Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) showed no inhibition of virus activity. Currently, not enough data exist to confirm thiopurine drug ineffectiveness against viruses in the plant kingdom. This paper presents a screening of MP, 6‐methylmercaptopurine riboside (MMPR), 6‐thioguanine (6‐TG) and 1‐amino‐6‐mercaptopurine (1A‐MP) against TMV and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) in in vitro tobacco explants and against Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 3 (GLRaV 3) in in vitro grapevine explants. ELISA and RT‐PCR were used to evaluate antiviral activity. Higher toxicity levels of MP derivatives, compared to MP, were noted in tobacco and grapevine explants. 1A‐MP or 6‐TG treatment resulted CMV and GLRaV 3 virus‐eradicated explants as obtained with Inosine 5′‐monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitors, whereas TMV was not eradicated by any of the studied drugs.     

Detection and Sequence Analysis of Grapevine Leafroll‐Associated Virus 2 Isolates from China

Several grapevine leafroll‐associated viruses (GLRaVs) have been found frequently in grapevines behaving GLD. Among them, GLRaV‐2 is the only one belonging to Closterovirus, and mainly induces leafroll symptoms and graft incompatibility. In this study, new degenerate primer pairs designed against the HSP70 gene were applied in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR (nPCR) to detect GLRaV‐2 in 132 samples collected from 14 provinces and regions of China. Of the samples, 51.5% were infected with GLRaV‐2, and most did not exhibit GLD symptoms. Some popular grape cultivars had a high incidence of GLRaV‐2 infection, such as Cabernet Sauvignon (92.3%), Chardonnay (80%), Red Globe (75%) and Italian Riesling (73.7%). ‘Beta’ rootstocks, previously identified as negative samples, were also found to be highly infected with GLRaV‐2 (50%). GLRaV‐2 isolates obtained in this study showed identities ranging from 68.9% to 100% and 76.47% to 100.0% at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on the HSP70 gene showed that all GLRaV‐2 isolates in China belong to three of five reported phylogenetic groups. Different variants belonging to the PN and RG groups were present in a single isolate. The results showed that the new degenerate primer pairs could detect more GLRaV‐2 isolates than the previously reported primers. This is the first detailed report on the prevalence and gene diversity of GLRaV‐2 in China and also provides an nPCR method to improve the sensitivity of PCR as an alternative method when no real‐time PCR device is available.     

Agrobacterium rhizogenes—transformed plant roots as a source of grapevine viruses for purification

Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation was applied toVitis spp. andNicotiana spp. infected by different grapevine phloem-limited viruses (grapevine fleck virus, grapevine virus A, grapevine virus B) to obtain root cultures for virus purification. All plant species were successfully transformed, and several clones were established in liquid culture. Transformed grapevine roots contained as much virus as non transformed roots and more than leaves, as assessed by ELISA and thin sectioning. Likewise, transformed roots ofNicotiana benthamiana Domin. contained in average more GVA than leaves, especially those at the base and the top of the plant, whereas withNicotiana occidentalis wheel., GVB was apparently less concentrated than in leaves.Nicotiana root grew faster than those ofVitis. All viruses multiplied and persisted in root cultures, which were successfully used for purification. Virus yields were the same (GFkV and GVB) or higher (GVB) than those reported in the literature. Grapevine roots may prove useful for culturing and purifying other non-mechanically transmissible grapevine viruses.     

Structural insights into viral determinants of nematode mediated Grapevine fanleaf virus transmission

Many animal and plant viruses rely on vectors for their transmission from host to host. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), a picorna-like virus from plants, is transmitted specifically by the ectoparasitic nematode Xiphinema index. The icosahedral capsid of GFLV, which consists of 60 identical coat protein subunits (CP), carries the determinants of this specificity. Here, we provide novel insight into GFLV transmission by nematodes through a comparative structural and functional analysis of two GFLV variants. We isolated a mutant GFLV strain (GFLV-TD) poorly transmissible by nematodes, and showed that the transmission defect is due to a glycine to aspartate mutation at position 297 (Gly297Asp) in the CP. We next determined the crystal structures of the wild-type GFLV strain F13 at 3.0 Å and of GFLV-TD at 2.7 Å resolution. The Gly297Asp mutation mapped to an exposed loop at the outer surface of the capsid and did not affect the conformation of the assembled capsid, nor of individual CP molecules. The loop is part of a positively charged pocket that includes a previously identified determinant of transmission. We propose that this pocket is a ligand-binding site with essential function in GFLV transmission by X. index. Our data suggest that perturbation of the electrostatic landscape of this pocket affects the interaction of the virion with specific receptors of the nematode''s feeding apparatus, and thereby severely diminishes its transmission efficiency. These data provide a first structural insight into the interactions between a plant virus and a nematode vector.     

Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)-specific antibodies confer GFLV and Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana

Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is one of the most destructive pathogens of grapevine. In this study, we generated monoclonal antibodies binding specifically to the coat protein of GFLV. Antibody FL₃, which bound most strongly to GFLV and showed cross-reactivity to Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), was used to construct the single-chain antibody fragment scFvGFLVcp-55. To evaluate the potential of this single-chain variable fragment (scFv) to confer antibody-mediated virus resistance, transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana plants were generated in which the scFv accumulated in the cytosol. Recombinant protein levels of up to 0.1% total soluble protein were achieved. The T₁ and T₂ progenies conferred partial or complete protection against GFLV on challenge with the viral pathogen. The resistance to GFLV in transgenic plants was strictly related to scFvGFLVcp-55 accumulation levels, confirming that the antibody fragment was functional in planta and responsible for the GFLV resistance. In addition, transgenic plants conferring complete protection to GFLV showed substantially enhanced tolerance to ArMV. We demonstrate the first step towards the control of grapevine fanleaf degeneration, as scFvGFLVcp-55 could be an ideal candidate for mediating nepovirus resistance.     

Characterization of silencing suppressor p24 of Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2

Grapevine leafroll‐associated virus 2 (GLRaV‐2) p24 has been reported to be an RNA silencing suppressor (RSS). However, the mechanisms underlying p24's suppression of RNA silencing are unknown. Using Agrobacterium infiltration‐mediated RNA silencing assays, we showed that GLRaV‐2 p24 is a strong RSS triggered by positive‐sense green fluorescent protein (GFP) RNA, and that silencing suppression by p24 effectively blocks the accumulation of small interfering RNAs. Deletion analyses showed that the region of amino acids 1–188, which contains all predicted α‐helices and β‐strands, is required for the RSS activity of p24. Hydrophobic residues I35/F38/V85/V89/W149 and V162/L169/L170, previously shown to be critical for p24 self‐interaction, are also crucial for silencing suppression, and western blotting results suggested that a lack of self‐interaction ability results in decreased p24 accumulation in plants. The mutants showed greatly weakened or a lack of RSS activity. Substitution with two basic residues at positions 2 or 86, putatively involved in RNA binding, totally abolished the RSS activity of p24, suggesting that p24 uses an RNA‐binding strategy to suppress RNA silencing. Our results also showed that W54 in the WG/GW‐like motif (W54/G55) is crucial for the RSS activity of p24, whereas p24 does not physically interact with AGO1 of Nicotiana benthamiana. Furthermore, p24 did not promote AGO1 degradation, but significantly up‐regulated AGO1 mRNA expression, and this effect was correlated with the RSS activity of p24, indicating that p24 may interfere with microRNA‐directed processes. The presented results contribute to our understanding of viral suppression of RNA silencing and the molecular mechanisms underlying GLRaV‐2 infection.