Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3.

Termination of translation in higher organisms is a GTP-dependent process. However, in the structure of the single polypeptide chain release factor known so far (eRF1) there are no GTP binding motifs. Moreover, in prokaryotes, a GTP binding protein, RF3, stimulates translation termination. From these observations we proposed that a second eRF should exist, conferring GTP dependence for translation termination. Here, we have shown that the newly sequenced GTP binding Sup35-like protein from Xenopus laevis, termed eRF3, exhibits in vitro three important functional properties: (i) although being inactive as an eRF on its own, it greatly stimulates eRF1 activity in the presence of GTP and low concentrations of stop codons, resembling the properties of prokaryotic RF3; (ii) it binds and probably hydrolyses GTP; and (iii) it binds to eRF1. The structure of the C-domain of the X.laevis eRF3 protein is highly conserved with other Sup35-like proteins, as was also shown earlier for the eRF1 protein family. From these and our previous data, we propose that yeast Sup45 and Sup35 proteins belonging to eRF1 and eRF3 protein families respectively are also yeast termination factors. The absence of structural resemblance of eRF1 and eRF3 to prokaryotic RF1/2 and RF3 respectively, may point to the different evolutionary origin of the translation termination machinery in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. It is proposed that a quaternary complex composed of eRF1, eRF3, GTP and a stop codon of the mRNA is involved in termination of polypeptide synthesis in ribosomes.     

The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The product of the yeast SUP45 gene (Sup45p) is highly homologous to the Xenopus eukaryote release factor 1 (eRF1), which has release factor activity in vitro. We show, using the two-hybrid system, that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sup45p and the product of the SUP35 gene (Sup35p) interact in vivo. The ability of Sup45p C-terminally tagged with (His)6 to specifically precipitate Sup35p from a cell lysate was used to confirm this interaction in vitro. Although overexpression of either the SUP45 or SUP35 genes alone did not reduce the efficiency of codon-specific tRNA nonsense suppression, the simultaneous overexpression of both the SUP35 and SUP45 genes in nonsense suppressor tRNA-containing strains produced an antisuppressor phenotype. These data are consistent with Sup35p and Sup45p forming a complex with release factor properties. Furthermore, overexpression of either Xenopus or human eRF1 (SUP45) genes also resulted in anti-suppression only if that strain was also overexpressing the yeast SUP35 gene. Antisuppression is a characteristic phenotype associated with overexpression of both prokaryote and mitochondrial release factors. We propose that Sup45p and Sup35p interact to form a release factor complex in yeast and that Sup35p, which has GTP binding sequence motifs in its C-terminal domain, provides the GTP hydrolytic activity which is a demonstrated requirement of the eukaryote translation termination reaction.     

In vitro reconstitution of eukaryotic translation reveals cooperativity between release factors eRF1 and eRF3

Eukaryotic translation termination is triggered by peptide release factors eRF1 and eRF3. Whereas eRF1 recognizes all three termination codons and induces hydrolysis of peptidyl tRNA, eRF3's function remains obscure. Here, we reconstituted all steps of eukaryotic translation in vitro using purified ribosomal subunits; initiation, elongation, and termination factors; and aminoacyl tRNAs. This allowed us to investigate termination using pretermination complexes assembled on mRNA encoding a tetrapeptide and to propose a model for translation termination that accounts for the cooperative action of eRF1 and eRF3 in ensuring fast release of nascent polypeptide. In this model, binding of eRF1, eRF3, and GTP to pretermination complexes first induces a structural rearrangement that is manifested as a 2 nucleotide forward shift of the toeprint attributed to pretermination complexes that leads to GTP hydrolysis followed by rapid hydrolysis of peptidyl tRNA. Cooperativity between eRF1 and eRF3 required the eRF3 binding C-terminal domain of eRF1.     

八肋游仆虫eRF3 C端的76个氨基酸对于释放因子eRF1a的结合不是必需的

以八肋游仆虫第二类肽链释放因子eRF3基因为模板,用PCR的方法获得eRF3的C端(eRF3C)和C端缺失76个氨基酸的突变体eRF3Ct片段,并构建重组表达质粒pGEX-6p-1-eRF3C和pGEX-6p-1-eRF3Ct,转入大肠杆菌BL21(DE3)中获得了可溶性表达。通过Glutathione Sepharose 4B柱亲和层析纯化,重组蛋白GST-eRF3C和GST-eRF3Ct获得纯化。Western blotting分析表明获得的蛋白为目的蛋白。PreScission酶切割后得到eRF3C和eRF3Ct蛋白。体外pull down分析显示eRF3C和eRF3Ct均能与八肋游仆虫第一类释放因子eRF1a相互作用,这表明八肋游仆虫eRF3 C端的76个氨基酸对于释放因子eRF1a的结合不是必需的。     

The C-terminus of eRF1 defines a functionally important domain for translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by two release factors, eRF1 and eRF3, which interact to form a heterodimer that mediates termination at all three stop codons. By C-terminal deletion analysis of eRF1 from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that the extreme C-terminus of this 437-amino-acid protein defines a functionally important domain for translation termination. A strain encoding eRF1 lacking the C-terminal 32 amino acids is not viable, whereas deletion of the C-terminal 19 amino acids is viable but shows a termination defect in vivo causing an enhancement of nonsense suppression. Using a combination of two-hybrid analysis and in vitro binding studies, we demonstrate that deletions encompassing the C-terminus of eRF1 cause a significant reduction in eRF3 binding to eRF1. All of the C-terminally truncated eRF1 still bind the ribosome, suggesting that the C-terminus does not constitute a ribosome-binding domain and eRF1 does not need to form a stable complex with eRF3 in order to bind the ribosome. These data, together with previously published data, suggest that the region between amino acids 411 and 418 of yeast eRF1 defines an essential functional domain that is part of the major site of interaction with eRF3. However, a stable eRF1:eRF3 complex does not have to be formed to maintain viability or efficient translation termination. Alignment of the seven known eukaryotic eRF1 sequences indicates that a highly conserved motif, GFGGIGG/A is present within the region of the C-terminus, although our deletion studies suggest that it is sequences C-terminal to this region that are functionally important.     

Genetic interaction between yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factors and the decoding region of 18 S rRNA

Functional and structural similarities between tRNA and eukaryotic class 1 release factors (eRF1) described previously, provide evidence for the molecular mimicry concept. This concept is supported here by the demonstration of a genetic interaction between eRF1 and the decoding region of the ribosomal RNA, the site of tRNA-mRNA interaction. We show that the conditional lethality caused by a mutation in domain 1 of yeast eRF1 (P86A), that mimics the tRNA anticodon stem-loop, is rescued by compensatory mutations A1491G (rdn15) and U1495C (hyg1) in helix 44 of the decoding region and by U912C (rdn4) and G886A (rdn8) mutations in helix 27 of the 18 S rRNA. The rdn15 mutation creates a C1409-G1491 base-pair in yeast rRNA that is analogous to that in prokaryotic rRNA known to be important for high-affinity paromomycin binding to the ribosome. Indeed, rdn15 makes yeast cells extremely sensitive to paromomycin, indicating that the natural high resistance of the yeast ribosome to paromomycin is, in large part, due to the absence of the 1409-1491 base-pair. The rdn15 and hyg1 mutations also partially compensate for inactivation of the eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) resulting from the formation of the [PSI+] prion, a self-reproducible termination-deficient conformation of eRF3. However, rdn15, but not hyg1, rescues the conditional cell lethality caused by a GTPase domain mutation (R419G) in eRF3. Other antisuppressor rRNA mutations, rdn2(G517A), rdn1T(C1054T) and rdn12A(C526A), strongly inhibit [PSI+]-mediated stop codon read-through but do not cure cells of the [PSI+] prion. Interestingly, cells bearing hyg1 seem to enable [PSI+] strains to accumulate larger Sup35p aggregates upon Sup35p overproduction, suggesting a lower toxicity of overproduced Sup35p when the termination defect, caused by [PSI+], is partly relieved.     

C-terminal interaction of translational release factors eRF1 and eRF3 of fission yeast: G-domain uncoupled binding and the role of conserved amino acids.

Translation termination in eukaryotes requires a stop codon-responsive (class-I) release factor, eRF1, and a guanine nucleotide-responsive (class-II) release factor, eRF3. Schizosaccharomyces pombe eRF3 has an N-terminal polypeptide similar in size to the prion-like domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae eRF3 in addition to the EF-1alpha-like catalytic domain. By in vivo two-hybrid assay as well as by an in vitro pull-down analysis using purified proteins of S. pombe as well as of S. cerevisiae, eRF1 bound to the C-terminal one-third domain of eRF3, named eRF3C, but not to the N-terminal two-thirds, which was inconsistent with the previous report by Paushkin et al. (1997, Mol Cell Biol 17:2798-2805). The activity of S. pombe eRF3 in eRF1 binding was affected by Ala substitutions for the C-terminal residues conserved not only in eRF3s but also in elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-1alpha. These single mutational defects in the eRF1-eRF3 interaction became evident when either truncated protein eRF3C or C-terminally altered eRF1 proteins were used for the authentic protein, providing further support for the presence of a C-terminal interaction. Given that eRF3 is an EF-Tu/EF-1alpha homolog required for translation termination, the apparent dispensability of the N-terminal domain of eRF3 for binding to eRF1 is in contrast to importance, direct or indirect, in EF-Tu/EF-1alpha for binding to aminoacyl-tRNA, although both eRF3 and EF-Tu/EF-1alpha share some common amino acids for binding to eRF1 and aminoacyl-tRNA, respectively. These differences probably reflect the independence of eRF1 binding in relation to the G-domain function of eRF3 (i.e., probably uncoupled with GTP hydrolysis), whereas aminoacyl-tRNA binding depends on that of EF-Tu/EF-1alpha(i.e., coupled with GTP hydrolysis), which sheds some light on the mechanism of eRF3 function.     

Translation termination in eukaryotes: polypeptide release factor eRF1 is composed of functionally and structurally distinct domains

Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) trigger hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA at the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center mediated by one of the three termination codons. In eukaryotes, apart from catalyzing the translation termination reaction, eRF1 binds to and activates another factor, eRF3, which is a ribosome-dependent and eRF1-dependent GTPase. Because peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis and GTP hydrolysis could be uncoupled in vitro, we suggest that the two main functions of eRF1 are associated with different domains of the eRF1 protein. We show here by deletion analysis that human eRF1 is composed of two physically separated and functionally distinct domains. The "core" domain is fully competent in ribosome binding and termination-codon-dependent peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, and encompasses the N-terminal and middle parts of the polypeptide chain. The C-terminal one-third of eRF1 binds to eRF3 in vivo in the absence of the core domain, but both domains are required to activate eRF3 GTPase in the ribosome. The calculated isoelectric points of the core and C domains are 9.74 and 4.23, respectively. This highly uneven charge distribution between the two domains implies that electrostatic interdomain interaction may affect the eRF1 binding to the ribosome and eRF3, its activity in the termination reaction and activation of eRF3 GTPase. The positively charged core of eRF1 may interact with negatively charged rRNA and peptidyl-tRNA phosphate backbones at the ribosomal eRF1 binding site and exhibit RNA-binding ability. The structural and functional dissimilarity of the core and eRF3-binding domains implies that evolutionarily eRF1 originated as a product of gene fusion.     

Interaction between yeast Sup45p (eRF1) and Sup35p (eRF3) polypeptide chain release factors: implications for prion-dependent regulation.

The SUP45 and SUP35 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode polypeptide chain release factors eRF1 and eRF3, respectively. It has been suggested that the Sup35 protein (Sup35p) is subject to a heritable conformational switch, similar to mammalian prions, thus giving rise to the non-Mendelian [PSI+] nonsense suppressor determinant. In a [PSI+] state, Sup35p forms high-molecular-weight aggregates which may inhibit Sup35p activity, leading to the [PSI+] phenotype. Sup35p is composed of the N-terminal domain (N) required for [PSI+] maintenance, the presumably nonfunctional middle region (M), and the C-terminal domain (C) essential for translation termination. In this study, we observed that the N domain, alone or as a part of larger fragments, can form aggregates in [PSI+] cells. Two sites for Sup45p binding were found within Sup35p: one is formed by the N and M domains, and the other is located within the C domain. Similarly to Sup35p, in [PSI+] cells Sup45p was found in aggregates. The aggregation of Sup45p is caused by its binding to Sup35p and was not observed when the aggregated Sup35p fragments did not contain sites for Sup45p binding. The incorporation of Sup45p into the aggregates should inhibit its activity. The N domain of Sup35p, responsible for its aggregation in [PSI+] cells, may thus act as a repressor of another polypeptide chain release factor, Sup45p. This phenomenon represents a novel mechanism of regulation of gene expression at the posttranslational level.     

Yeast polypeptide chain release factors eRF1 and eRF3 are involved in cytoskeleton organization and cell cycle regulation

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is controlled by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 recognizes nonsense codons UAA, UAG, and UGA, while eRF3 stimulates polypeptide release from the ribosome in a GTP- and eRF1-dependent manner. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, eRF1 and eRF3 are encoded by the SUP45 and SUP35 genes, respectively. Here we show that in yeast shortage of any one of the release factors was accompanied by a reduction in the levels of the other release factor and resulted in a substantial increase of nonsense codon readthrough. Besides, repression of the genes encoding these factors caused different effects on cell morphology. Repression of the SUP35 gene caused accumulation of cells of increased size with large buds. This was accompanied by the disappearance of actin cytoskeletal structures, impairment of the mitotic spindle structure, and defects in nuclei division and segregation in mitosis. The evolutionary conserved C-terminal domain of eRF3 similar to the elongation factor EF-1alpha was responsible for these effects. Repression of the SUP45 gene caused accumulation of unbudded cells with 2C and higher DNA content, indicating that DNA replication is uncoupled from budding. The data obtained suggest that eRF1 and eRF3 play additional, nontranslational roles in the yeast cell.     

Influence of individual domains of the translation termination factor eRF1 on induction of the GTPase activity of the translation termination factor eRF3

Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by two proteins, belonging to the class-1 (eRF1) and class-2 (eRF3) polypeptide release factors. eRF3 catalyzes hydrolysis of GTP to GDP and inorganic phosphate in the ribosome in the absence of mRNA, tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA and peptidyl-tRNA but needs the presence of eRF1. It's known that eRF1 and eRF3 interact with each other in vitro and in vivo via their C-terminal regions. eRF1 consists of three domains - N, M, and C. In this study we examined the influence of individual domains of the human eRF1 on induction of the human eRF3 GTPase activity in the ribosome in vitro. It was shown that none of the N-, M-, C- and NM-domains induces eRF3 GTPase activity in presence of the ribosomes. MC-domain does induce GTPase activity of eRF3 but four times less efficient than full-length eRF1, therefore, MC-domain (and very likely M-domain) binds to the ribosome in the presence of eRF3. Based on these data and taking into account the data available in literature, a conclusion was drawn that the N domain of eRF1 is not essential for eRF1-dependent induction of the eRF3 GTPase activity. A working hypothesis is formulated, postulating that GTPase activity eRF3 during the translation termination is associated with the intermolecular interactions of GTP/GDP, GTPase center of the large ribosomal subunit (60S), MC-domain of eRF1, C-terminal region and GTP-binding domains of eRF3, but without participation of the N-terminal region of eRF3.     

The product of the mammalian orthologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HBS1 gene is phylogenetically related to eukaryotic release factor 3 (eRF3) but does not carry eRF3-like activity

We describe here the cloning and sequencing of human and mouse cDNAs encoding a putative GTP binding protein. Sequence comparison shows that these cDNAs (named eRFS) are likely to represent the orthologues of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae HBS1 gene and that the C-terminal domains of the encoded proteins share structural features with eukaryotic elongation factor eEF-1A and release factor 3 (eRF3) families. The phylogenetic analysis suggests that eRFS proteins and Hbs1p form a cluster of orthologous sequences branching with the eRF3 family. Nevertheless, in yeast, the human eRFS protein and Hbs1p do not complement eRF3/Sup35p thermosensitive mutation and do not interact with eRF1.     

Influence of individual domains of the translation termination factor eRF1 on induction of the GTPase activity of the translation termination factor eRF3

Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by two proteins belonging to class 1 (eRF1) and class 2 (eRF3) polypeptide release factors. eRF3 catalyzes hydrolysis of GTP to yield GDP and P_i in the ribosome in the absence of mRNA, tRNA, aminoacyl-tRNA, and peptidyl-tRNA and requires eRF1 for this activity. It is known that eRF1 and eRF3 interact with each other via their C-terminal regions both in vitro and in vivo. eRF1 consists of three domains—N, M, and C. In this study we examined the influence of the individual domains of the human eRF1 on induction of the human eRF3 GTPase activity in the ribosome in vitro. It was shown that none of the N, M, C, and NM domains induces the eRF3 GTPase activity in the presence of ribosomes. The MC domain does induce the eRF3 GTPase activity, but four times less efficiently than full-length eRF1. Therefore, we assumed that the MC domain (and very likely the M domain) binds to the ribosome in the presence of eRF3. Based on these data and taking into account the data available in the literature, a conclusion was drawn that the N domain of eRF1 is not essential for eRF1-dependent induction of the eRF3 GTPase activity. A working hypothesis is formulated that the eRF3 GTPase activity in the ribosome during translation termination is associated with the intermolecular interactions of GTP/GDP, the GTPase center of the large (60S) subunit, the MC domain of eRF1, and the C-terminal region and GTP-binding motifs of eRF3 but without participation of the N-terminal region of eRF1.     

Terminating eukaryote translation: domain 1 of release factor eRF1 functions in stop codon recognition

Eukaryote ribosomal translation is terminated when release factor eRF1, in a complex with eRF3, binds to one of the three stop codons. The tertiary structure and dimensions of eRF1 are similar to that of a tRNA, supporting the hypothesis that release factors may act as molecular mimics of tRNAs. To identify the yeast eRF1 stop codon recognition domain (analogous to a tRNA anticodon), a genetic screen was performed to select for mutants with disabled recognition of only one of the three stop codons. Nine out of ten mutations isolated map to conserved residues within the eRF1 N-terminal domain 1. A subset of these mutants, although wild-type for ribosome and eRF3 interaction, differ in their respective abilities to recognize each of the three stop codons, indicating codon-specific discrimination defects. Five of six of these stop codon-specific mutants define yeast domain 1 residues (I32, M48, V68, L123, and H129) that locate at three pockets on the eRF1 domain 1 molecular surface into which a stop codon can be modeled. The genetic screen results and the mutant phenotypes are therefore consistent with a role for domain 1 in stop codon recognition; the topology of this eRF1 domain, together with eRF1-stop codon complex modeling further supports the proposal that this domain may represent the site of stop codon binding itself.     

Polypeptide release factor eRF1 from Tetrahymena thermophila: cDNA cloning, purification and complex formation with yeast eRF3.

The first cDNA for the translational release factor eRF1 of ciliates was cloned from Tetrahymena thermophila. The coding frame contained one UAG and nine UAA codons that are reassigned for glutamine in Tetrahymena. The deduced protein sequence is 57% identical to human eRF1. The recombinant Tetrahymena eRF1 purified from a yeast expression system was able to bind to yeast eRF3 as do other yeast or mammalian eRF1s as a prerequisite step for protein termination. The recombinant Tetrahymena eRF1, nevertheless, failed to catalyze polypeptide termination in vitro with rat or Artemia ribosomes, at least in part, due to less efficient binding to the heterologous ribosomes. Stop codon specificity and phylogenetic significance of Tetrahymena eRF1 are discussed from the conservative protein feature.     

A genetic approach for analyzing the co-operative function of the tRNA mimicry complex,eRF1/eRF3, in translation termination on the ribosome

During termination of translation in eukaryotes, a GTP-binding protein, eRF3, functions within a complex with the tRNA-mimicking protein, eRF1, to decode stop codons. It remains unclear how the tRNA-mimicking protein co-operates with the GTPase and with the functional sites on the ribosome. In order to elucidate the molecular characteristics of tRNA-mimicking proteins involved in stop codon decoding, we have devised a heterologous genetic system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that eRF3 from Pneumocystis carinii (Pc-eRF3) did not complement depletion of S. cerevisiae eRF3. The strength of Pc-eRF3 binding to Sc-eRF1 depends on the GTP-binding domain, suggesting that defects of the GTPase switch in the heterologous complex causes the observed lethality. We isolated mutants of Pc-eRF3 and Sc-eRF1 that restore cell growth in the presence of Pc-eRF3 as the sole source of eRF3. Mapping of these mutations onto the latest 3D-complex structure revealed that they were located in the binding-interface region between eRF1 and eRF3, as well as in the ribosomal functional sites. Intriguingly, a novel functional site was revealed adjacent to the decoding site of eRF1, on the tip domain that mimics the tRNA anticodon loop. This novel domain likely participates in codon recognition, coupled with the GTPase function.     

GTP-dependent structural rearrangement of the eRF1:eRF3 complex and eRF3 sequence motifs essential for PABP binding

Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by the concerted action of eRF1 and eRF3 factors. eRF1 recognizes the stop codon in the A site of the ribosome and promotes nascent peptide chain release, and the GTPase eRF3 facilitates this peptide release via its interaction with eRF1. In addition to its role in termination, eRF3 is involved in normal and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay through its association with cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) via PAM2-1 and PAM2-2 motifs in the N-terminal domain of eRF3. We have studied complex formation between full-length eRF3 and its ligands (GDP, GTP, eRF1 and PABP) using isothermal titration calorimetry, demonstrating formation of the eRF1:eRF3:PABP:GTP complex. Analysis of the temperature dependence of eRF3 interactions with G nucleotides reveals major structural rearrangements accompanying formation of the eRF1:eRF3:GTP complex. This is in contrast to eRF1:eRF3:GDP complex formation, where no such rearrangements were detected. Thus, our results agree with the established active role of GTP in promoting translation termination. Through point mutagenesis of PAM2-1 and PAM2-2 motifs in eRF3, we demonstrate that PAM2-2, but not PAM2-1 is indispensible for eRF3:PABP complex formation.     

N-terminal extension of Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation termination factor eRF3 influences the suppression efficiency of sup35 mutations

The eukaryotic translation termination factor eRF3 stimulates release of nascent polypeptides from the ribosome in a GTP-dependent manner. In most eukaryotes studied, eRF3 consists of an essential, conserved C-terminal domain and a nonessential, nonconserved N-terminal extension. However, in some species, this extension is required for efficient termination. Our data show that the N-terminal extension of Saccharomyces cerevisiae eRF3 also participates in regulation of termination efficiency, but acts as a negative factor, increasing nonsense suppression efficiency in sup35 mutants containing amino acid substitutions in the C-terminal domain of the protein.     

Nuclear localization of eukaryotic class II release factor (eRF3): implication for the multifunction of eRF3 in ciliates Euplotes cell

Class II polypeptide release factor (eRF3), a ribosome and eRF1-dependent GTPase, is an important factor, which acts cooperatively with eRF1 to promote hydrolysis of the ester bond linking the polypeptide chain with the peptidyl site tRNA in process of termination of protein synthesis. We prepared antibodies against eRF3 of Euplotes octocarinatus, and performed localization studies by immunoelectron microscopy in the ciliate. Our results indicate that eRF3 is present both in the cytoplasm and the two types of nuclei of this organism. The functions of eRF3 in these nuclei were analyzed by RNA interference methods. The nuclei loose their shape in eRF3 gene-interfered Euplotes cells, suggesting that eRF3 is probably involved in the morphological organization of nuclei. This suggests that eRF3 is a multifunctional protein with roles additionals to its function in the process of termination of protein synthesis.