Structure and functions of linker histones

Linker histones such as variants H1, H5, and other similar proteins play an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. However, interactions of linker histones with DNA and proteins, as well as specific functions of their different variants, are poorly studied. This is because they acquire tertiary structure only when interacting with a nucleosome, and because of limitations of currently available methods. However, deeper investigation of linker histones and their interactions with other proteins will address a number of important questions — from structure of compacted chromatin to regulation of early embryogenesis. In this review, structures of histone H1 variants and its interaction with chromatin DNA are considered. A possible functional significance of different H1 variants, a role of these proteins in maintaining interphase chromatin structure, and interactions of linker histones with other cellular proteins are also discussed.     

Histone variants--the structure behind the function.

In recent years, the chromatin field has witnessed a renewed interest in histone variants as pertaining to their structural role, but mainly because of the functional specificity they impart to chromatin. In this review, I am going to discuss several of the most recent structural studies on core histone (H2A.Bbd, H2A.Z, H2A.X, macroH2A, H3.3, CENP-A) and linker histone variants (histone H1 microheterogeneity) focusing on their role in nucleosome stability and chromatin fibre dynamics with special emphasis on their possible functional implications. The data accumulated to date indicates that histone variability plays an important role in the histone-mediated regulation of chromatin metabolism. Understanding and deciphering the underlying structural amino acid code behind such variability remains one of the most exciting future challenges in chromatin research.     

Histone Variants in Development and Diseases

Eukaryotic genomic DNA is highly packaged into chromatin by histones to fit inside the nucleus. Other than the bulk packaging role of canonical histones with an expression peak at S phase and replication-coupled deposition, different histone variants have evolved distinct regulatory mechanisms for their expression, deposition and functional implications. The diversity of histone variants results in structural plasticity of chromatin and highlights functionally distinct chromosomal domain, which plays critical roles in development from a fertilized egg into a complex organism, as well as in aging and diseases. However, the mechanisms of this fundamental process are poorly understood so far. It is of particular interest to investigate how the variants are incorporated into chromatin and mark specific chromatin states to regulate gene expression, and how they are involved in development and diseases. In this review, we focus on recent progress in studies of epigenetic regulation of three extensively investigated variants including H2A.Z, macroH2A and H3.3, and their functional implications in development and diseases.     

Subnuclear distribution of the entire complement of linker histone variants in Arabidopsis thaliana

Linker histones (e.g. H1, H5, H1°) are thought to exert control on chromatin function by restricting nucleosomal dynamics. All higher eukaryotes possess a diverse family of linker histones, which may exhibit functional specialization. Arabidopsis thaliana apparently contains a minimal complement of linker histone structural variants and therefore is an ideal model for investigating functional differentiation among linker histones. Histones H1-1 and H1-2 are relatively similar proteins that are expressed in a wide variety of tissues and make up the majority of linker histone while H1-3 is a highly divergent minor variant protein that is induced by drought stress. We are interested in determining whether the in vivo distribution of each of these proteins also differs. To this end, we have produced subtype-specific antibodies and have localized each of the three proteins at the intranuclear and DNA sequence levels by indirect immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation, respectively. Antibodies against linker histones H1-1 and H1-2 decorate nuclei in patterns very similar to 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, but different than the staining pattern of total histones. In contrast, antibodies made against two regions of H1-3 bind to chromatin in a diffuse pattern distinct from the DAPI-staining pattern. We also describe a technique to determine the localization of plant linker histone variants along regions of chromatin, employing in vivo chemical DNA-protein cross-linking to preserve native associations followed by immunoprecipitation with subtype-specific antibodies. We use this technique to demonstrate that, in contrast to the major linker histones, H1-3 does not bind the repetitive sequences pAL1 and 5S rDNA. In addition, we show that linker histones are bound to the compacted nucleosomal arrays at the telomere but with reduced stoichiometry. Taken together, our results suggest that plants, as has been shown for animals, possess a variant linker histone that is differentially localized. Received: 15 April 1999 / Accepted: 1 Mai 1999     

A Mechanism for Histone Chaperoning Activity of Nucleoplasmin: Thermodynamic and Structural Models

Nucleoplasmin (NP), a histone chaperone, acts as a reservoir for histones H2A-H2B in Xenopus laevis eggs and can displace sperm nuclear basic proteins and linker histones from the chromatin fiber of sperm and quiescent somatic nuclei. NP has been proposed to mediate the dynamic exchange of histones during the expression of certain genes and assists the assembly of nucleosomes by modulating the interaction between histones and DNA. Here, solution structural models of full-length NP and NP complexes with the functionally distinct nucleosomal core and linker histones are presented for the first time, providing a picture of the physical interactions between the nucleosomal and linker histones with NP core and tail domains. Small-angle X-ray scattering and isothermal titration calorimetry reveal that NP pentamer can accommodate five histones, either H2A-H2B dimers or H5, and that NP core and tail domains are intimately involved in the association with histones. The analysis of the binding events, employing a site-specific cooperative model, reveals a negative cooperativity-based regulatory mechanism for the linker histone/nucleosomal histone exchange. The two histone types bind with drastically different intrinsic affinity, and the strongest affinity is observed for the NP variant that mimicks the hyperphosphorylated active protein. The different “affinity windows” for H5 and H2A-H2B might allow NP to fulfill its histone chaperone role, simultaneously acting as a reservoir for the core histones and a chromatin decondensing factor. Our data are compatible with the previously proposed model where NP facilitates nucleosome assembly by removing the linker histones and depositing H2A-H2B dimers onto DNA.     

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions.

BACKGROUND: Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact. METHODS: A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.     

Differential in vivo binding dynamics of somatic and oocyte-specific linker histones in oocytes and during ES cell nuclear transfer

The embryonic genome is formed by fusion of a maternal and a paternal genome. To accommodate the resulting diploid genome in the fertilized oocyte dramatic global genome reorganizations must occur. The higher order structure of chromatin in vivo is critically dependent on architectural chromatin proteins, with the family of linker histone proteins among the most critical structural determinants. Although somatic cells contain numerous linker histone variants, only one, H1FOO, is present in mouse oocytes. Upon fertilization H1FOO rapidly populates the introduced paternal genome and replaces sperm-specific histone-like proteins. The same dynamic replacement occurs upon introduction of a nucleus during somatic cell nuclear transfer. To understand the molecular basis of this dynamic histone replacement process, we compared the localization and binding dynamics of somatic H1 and oocyte-specific H1FOO and identified the molecular determinants of binding to either oocyte or somatic chromatin in living cells. We find that although both histones associate readily with chromatin in nuclei of somatic cells, only H1FOO is capable of correct chromatin association in the germinal vesicle stage oocyte nuclei. This specificity is generated by the N-terminal and globular domains of H1FOO. Measurement of in vivo binding properties of the H1 variants suggest that H1FOO binds chromatin more tightly than somatic linker histones. We provide evidence that both the binding properties of linker histones as well as additional, active processes contribute to the replacement of somatic histones with H1FOO during nuclear transfer. These results provide the first mechanistic insights into the crucial step of linker histone replacement as it occurs during fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer.     

Binding of antitumor antibiotic daunomycin to histones in chromatin and in solution

Daunomycin is an anticancer drug that is well-known to interact with DNA in chromatin. Using a compositionally defined chicken erythrocyte chromatin fraction, we have obtained conclusive evidence that the drug is also able to interact with chromatin-bound linker histones without any noticeable binding to core histones. The drug can interact in an equal fashion with both histone H1 and H5 and to a greater extent with core histones H3/H4 and H2A/H2B as free proteins in solution. Thus, the binding of daunomycin to linker histones in the chromatin fiber is most likely due to the well-known higher accessibility of these histones to the surrounding environment of the fiber. Binding of daunomycin to linker histones appears to primarily involve the trypsin-resistant (winged-helix) domain of these proteins. The studies described here reveal the occurrence of a previously undisclosed mechanism for the antitumor activity of anthracycline drugs at the chromatin level.     

The Differential Mobilization of Histones H3.1 and H3.3 by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Relates Histone Dynamics to the Assembly of Viral Chromatin

During lytic infections, HSV-1 genomes are assembled into unstable nucleosomes. The histones required for HSV-1 chromatin assembly, however, are in the cellular chromatin. We have shown that linker (H1) and core (H2B and H4) histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection, and proposed that the mobilized histones are available for assembly into viral chromatin. However, the actual relevance of histone mobilization remained unknown. We now show that canonical H3.1 and variant H3.3 are also mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Mobilization required no HSV-1 protein expression, although immediate early or early proteins enhanced it. We used the previously known differential association of H3.3 and H3.1 with HSV-1 DNA to test the relevance of histone mobilization. H3.3 binds to HSV-1 genomes first, whereas H3.1 only binds after HSV-1 DNA replication initiates. Consistently, H3.3 and H3.1 were differentially mobilized. H3.1 mobilization decreased with HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 mobilization was largely unaffected by it. These results support a model in which previously mobilized H3.1 is immobilized by assembly into viral chromatin during HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 is mobilized and assembled into HSV-1 chromatin throughout infection. The differential mobilizations of H3.3 and H3.1 are consistent with their differential assembly into viral chromatin. These data therefore relate nuclear histone dynamics to the composition of viral chromatin and provide the first evidence that histone mobilization relates to viral chromatin assembly.     

Laser-induced crosslinking of histones to DNA in chromatin and core particles: implications in studying histone-DNA interactions.

UV laser irradiation has been used to covalently crosslink histones to DNA in nuclei, chromatin and core particles and the presence of the different histone species in the covalently linked material was detected immunochemically. When nuclei were irradiated and then trypsinized to cleave the N- and C- terminal histone tails, no histones have been found covalently linked to DNA. This finding shows that UV laser-induced crosslinking of histones to DNA is accomplished via the non-structured domains only. This unexpected way of crosslinking operated in chromatin, H1-depleted chromatin and core particles, i.e. independently of the chromatin structure. The efficiency of crosslinking, however, showed such a dependence: whilst the yield of crosslinks was similar in total and H1-depleted chromatin, in core particles the efficiency was 3-4 times lower for H2A, H2B and H4 and 10-12 times lower for H3. The decreased crosslinking efficiency, especially dramatic in the case of H3, is attributed to a reduced number of binding sites, and, respectively, is considered as a direct evidence for interaction of nonstructured tails of core histones with linker DNA.     

The role of H2B histones from the sea urchin sperm in the formation of supranucleosome structures

The structural role of histone H2B from sea urchin sperm (H2Bsp) has been examined in experiments on reconstitution of chromatin from DNA and core histones taken in three variants: (1) four core histones from sea urchin sperm; (2) four core histones from calf thymus; (3) (H3, H4, H2A) from calf thymus and H2Bsp. It is shown that H2Bsp when present in reconstituted chromatin induces its aggregation. Fidelity of the reconstitution of nucleosomes has been tested using DNase I probe, one- and two-dimensional electrophoresis and electron microscopy. The reconstitutes that contain H2Bsp appear under electron microscope mainly as regular closely spaced large granules, about 450 A in diameter, which are very similar to the granules found in "native" sea urchin sperm chromatin. The reconstitutes formed by four core histones from calf thymus appear as randomly arranged particles, about 100 A in diameter. We conclude that histone H2Bsp participates in interactions between nucleosomes and is involved in the formation of the condensed supranucleosomal structure in sea urchin sperm chromatin.