Tumor cell "dead or alive": caspase and survivin regulate cell death, cell cycle and cell survival

Cell death and cell cycle progression are two sides of the same coin, and these two different phenomenons are regulated moderately to maintain the cellular homeostasis. Tumor is one of the disease states produced as a result of the disintegrated regulation and is characterized as cells showing an irreversible progression of cell cycle and a resistance to cell death signaling. Several investigations have been performed for the understanding of cell death or cell cycle, and cell death research has remarkably progressed in these 10 years. Caspase is a nomenclature referring to ICE/CED-3 cysteine proteinase family and plays a central role during cell death. Recently, several investigations raised some possible hypotheses that caspase is also involved in cell cycle regulation. In this issue, therefore, we review the molecular basis of cell death and cell cycle regulated by caspase in tumor, especially hepatocellular carcinoma cells.     

Hemopoietic cell transformation is associated with failure to downregulate glucose uptake during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle

Growth factors and cytokines initiate multiple signal transduction pathways that lead to cell survival, cell cycle progression or differentiation. A common feature of these pathways is increased cellular metabolism and glucose uptake. Furthermore, the energy requirements of many cancers and transformed cell lines are met by constitutive upregulation of glucose uptake. Relationships among transforming events, glucose uptake and cell cycle progression are not well understood. Here we investigated the regulation of glucose transport during the cell cycle of growth factor-dependent 32D cells, primary T-cells, src-transformed 32D cells and Jurkat cells. Cells were enriched in the G1, S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, and glucose transporter expression and 2-deoxyglucose uptake were measured. Glucose transporter expression increased with cell volume as cells progressed through the cell cycle. Growth factor-dependent 32D cells and T-lymphocytes were characterised by increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake from G1 to S and reduced uptake at G2/M, with the highest specific activity of transporters in the S phase. In contrast, src-transformed 32D cells and Jurkat cells showed increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake from S to G2/M, with the highest glucose transporter specific activity in G2/M. Our results show that glucose transport is regulated in a cell cycle-dependent manner and suggest that this regulation may be altered in transformed cells.     

Cell cycle in the fucus zygote parallels a somatic cell cycle but displays a unique translational regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases

In eukaryotic cells, the basic machinery of cell cycle control is highly conserved. In particular, many cellular events during cell cycle progression are controlled by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The cell cycle in animal early embryos, however, differs substantially from that of somatic cells or yeasts. For example, cell cycle checkpoints that ensure that the sequence of cell cycle events is correct have been described in somatic cells and yeasts but are largely absent in embryonic cells. Furthermore, the regulation of CDKs is substantially different in the embryonic and somatic cells. In this study, we address the nature of the first cell cycle in the brown alga Fucus, which is evolutionarily distant from the model systems classically used for cell cycle studies in embryos. This cycle consists of well-defined G1, S, G2, and M phases. The purine derivative olomoucine inhibited CDKs activity in vivo and in vitro and induced different cell cycle arrests, including at the G1/S transition, suggesting that, as in somatic cells, CDKs tightly control cell cycle progression. The cell cycle of Fucus zygotes presented the other main features of a somatic cell cycle, such as a functional spindle assembly checkpoint that targets CDKs and the regulation of the early synthesis of two PSTAIRE CDKs, p32 and p34, and the associated histone H1 kinase activity as well as the regulation of CDKs by tyrosine phosphorylation. Surprisingly, the synthesis after fertilization of p32 and p34 was translationally regulated, a regulation not described previously for CDKs. Finally, our results suggest that the activation of mitotic CDKs relies on an autocatalytic amplification mechanism.     

The cancer‐related transcription factor Runx2 modulates cell proliferation in human osteosarcoma cell lines

Runx2 regulates osteogenic differentiation and bone formation, but also suppresses pre‐osteoblast proliferation by affecting cell cycle progression in the G₁ phase. The growth suppressive potential of Runx2 is normally inactivated in part by protein destabilization, which permits cell cycle progression beyond the G₁/S phase transition, and Runx2 is again up‐regulated after mitosis. Runx2 expression also correlates with metastasis and poor chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma. Here we show that six human osteosarcoma cell lines (SaOS, MG63, U2OS, HOS, G292, and 143B) have different growth rates, which is consistent with differences in the lengths of the cell cycle. Runx2 protein levels are cell cycle‐regulated with respect to the G₁/S phase transition in U2OS, HOS, G292, and 143B cells. In contrast, Runx2 protein levels are constitutively expressed during the cell cycle in SaOS and MG63 cells. Forced expression of Runx2 suppresses growth in all cell lines indicating that accumulation of Runx2 in excess of its pre‐established levels in a given cell type triggers one or more anti‐proliferative pathways in osteosarcoma cells. Thus, regulatory mechanisms controlling Runx2 expression in osteosarcoma cells must balance Runx2 protein levels to promote its putative oncogenic functions, while avoiding suppression of bone tumor growth. J. Cell. Physiol. 228: 714–723, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Cyclin D1 serves as a cell cycle regulatory switch in actively proliferating cells

Much of our current understanding of the cell cycle involves analyses of its induction in quiescent cells. To better understand the control of cell cycle propagation and termination, studies have been performed in actively cycling cultures using time-lapse photography and quantitative image analysis. These studies reveal a highly ordered sequence of events required for promotion of continued proliferation. The decision to continue cell cycle progression takes place in G2 phase, when cellular Ras induces the elevation of cyclin D1 levels. These levels are maintained through G1 phase and are required for the initiation of S phase, at which time cyclin D1 levels are automatically reduced to low levels. The reduction of cyclin D1 to low levels during S phase is required for DNA synthesis, and forces the cell to induce high cyclin D1 levels once again when it enters G2 phase. In this way, cyclin D1 is proposed to serve as an active switch in the regulation of continued cell cycle progression.     

IQGAP1 translocates to the nucleus in early S-phase and contributes to cell cycle progression after DNA replication arrest

IQGAP1 is a plasma membrane-associated protein and an important regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, contributing to cell migration, polarity and adhesion. In this study, we demonstrate the nuclear translocation of IQGAP1 using confocal microscopy and cell fractionation. Moreover, we identify a specific pool of IQGAP1 that accumulates in the nucleus during late G1-early S phase of the cell cycle. The nuclear targeting of IQGAP1 was facilitated by N- and C-terminal sequences, and its ability to slowly shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm/membrane was partly regulated by the CRM1 export receptor. The inhibition of GSK-3β also stimulated nuclear localization of IQGAP1. The dramatic nuclear accumulation of IQGAP1 observed when cells were arrested in G1/S phase suggested a possible role in cell cycle regulation. In support of this, we used immunoprecipitation assays to show that the nuclear pool of IQGAP1 in G1/S-arrested cells associates with DNA replication complex factors RPA32 and PCNA. More important, the siRNA-mediated silencing of IQGAP1 significantly delayed cell cycle progression through S phase and G2/M in NIH 3T3 cells released from thymidine block. Our findings reveal an unexpected regulatory pathway for IQGAP1, and show that a pool of this cytoskeletal regulator translocates into the nucleus in late G1/early S phase to stimulate DNA replication and progression of the cell cycle.     

Viral infections and cell cycle G2／M regulation

Progression of cells from G2 phase of the cell cycle to mitosis is a tightly regulated cellular process that requires activation of the Cdc2 kinase, which determines onset of mitosis in all eukaryotic cells. In both human and fission yeast(Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, the activity of Cdc2 is regulated in part by the phosphorylation status of tyrosine 15 (Tyrl5) on Cdc2, which is phosphorylated by Weel kinase during late G2 and is rapidly dephosphorylated by the Cdc25 tyrosine phosphatase to trigger entry into mitosis. These Cdc2 regulators are the downstream targets of two wellcharacterized G2/M checkpoint pathways which prevent cells from entering mitosis when cellular DNA is damaged or when DNA replication is inhibited. Increasing evidence suggests that Cdc2 is also commonly targeted by viral proteins,which modulate host cell cycle machinery to benefit viral survival or replication. In this review, we describe the effect of viral protein R (Vpr) encoded by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-Ⅰ) on cell cycle G2/M regulation. Based on our current knowledge about this viral effect, we hypothesize that Vpr induces cell cycle G2 arrest through a mechanism that is to some extent different from the classic G2/M checkpoints. One the unique features distinguishing Vpr-induced G2 arrest from the classic checkpoints is the role of phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in Vpr-induced G2 arrest.Interestingly, PP2A is targeted by a number of other viral proteins including SV40 small T antigen, polyomavirus T antigen, HTLV Tax and adenovirus E4orf4. Thus an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying Vpr-induced G2 arrest will provide additional insights into the basic biology of cell cycle G2/M regulation and into the biological significance of this effect during host-pathogen interactions.     

Ras-dependent cell cycle commitment during G2 phase

Synchronization used to study cell cycle progression may change the characteristics of rapidly proliferating cells. By combining time-lapse, quantitative fluorescent microscopy and microinjection, we have established a method to analyze the cell cycle progression of individual cells without synchronization. This new approach revealed that rapidly growing NIH3T3 cells make a Ras-dependent commitment for completion of the next cell cycle while they are in G2 phase of the preceding cell cycle. Thus, Ras activity during G2 phase induces cyclin D1 expression. This expression continues through the next G1 phase even in the absence of Ras activity, and drives cells into S phase.     

Regulation of the initiation step of DNA replication by cyclin-dependent kinases

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) play a central role in the regulation of cell cycle progression in eukaryotes. The onset of S phase, the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication, is a major cell cycle event that is regulated by CDKs. Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA replication is highly regulated and occurs as a two-step reaction. The first reaction, known as licensing, is essential for DNA replication by making cell replication competent and occurs in G1 phase. Once cells enter S phase, licensed chromosomes initiate DNA replication through the action of two conserved protein kinases, S phase-specific CDK and Cdc7-Dbf4 (or Dbf4-dependent kinase). Our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of DNA replication in model eukaryotes has advanced considerably in the past decade. In this review, we overview the regulation of DNA replication in the eukaryotic cell cycle, focusing specifically on how CDKs regulate the initiation step of DNA replication.     

Novel control of S phase of the cell cycle by ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme H7

Timely degradation of regulatory proteins by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway (UPP) is an established paradigm of cell cycle regulation during the G2/M and G1/S transitions. Less is known about roles for the UPP during S phase. Here we present evidence that dynamic cell cycle–dependent changes in levels of UbcH7 regulate entrance into and progression through S phase. In diverse cell lines, UbcH7 protein levels are dramatically reduced in S phase but are fully restored by G2. Knockdown of UbcH7 increases the proportion of cells in S phase and doubles the time to traverse S phase, whereas UbcH7 overexpression reduces the proportion of cells in S phase. These data suggest a role for UbcH7 targets in the completion of S phase and entry into G2. Notably, UbcH7 knockdown was coincident with elevated levels of the checkpoint kinase Chk1 but not Chk2. These results argue that UbcH7 promotes S phase progression to G2 by modulating the intra-S phase checkpoint mediated by Chk1. Furthermore, UbcH7 levels appear to be regulated by a UPP. Together the data identify novel roles for the UPP, specifically UbcH7 in the regulation of S phase transit time as well as in cell proliferation.     

Identification of a restriction point at the M/G1 transition during the ongoing cell cycle

Progression through the cell cycle is dependent upon numerous external factors (growth factors, extracellular matrix components) which exert their effects through the activation of signal transduction networks. During last years we have studied the regulation of progression through the ongoing CHO cell cycle. Recently, we have demonstrated that in CHO cells at least two serum dependent points exist in G1 phase that lead to different cellular responses. The first point is located immediately after mitosis and is suggested to link with apoptosis, while the second is located in late G1 phase and probably corresponds to the classical restriction point R. Because of the suggested link with apoptosis of the restriction point in early G1 phase, we have studied the possible role of PI 3-K in cell cycle progression through the ongoing G1 phase of CHO cells. In the presence of the PI 3-K inhibitors wortmannin or LY294002, cells were arrested during early G1 phase, leading to the expression of cleaved caspase-3, a central mediator of apoptosis. Addition of AP-2, an inhibitor of PKB, the downstream substrate of PI 3-K, at several time points during G1 phase demonstrated that inhibition during early G1 phase caused cell cycle arrest, while addition of the inhibitors during mid or late G1 phase had no effect on S phase entry. As for inhibition of PI 3-K, also inhibition of PKB resulted in expression of cleaved caspase-3. These results clearly demonstrate that a decision point exists in the early G1 phase of the cell cycle; in the presence of PKB activity the cells are continuing cell cycle progression, while in the absence of PKB activity the cells are induced for apoptosis.     

Measuring cell cycle progression kinetics with metabolic labeling and flow cytometry

Precise control of the initiation and subsequent progression through the various phases of the cell cycle are of paramount importance in proliferating cells. Cell cycle division is an integral part of growth and reproduction and deregulation of key cell cycle components have been implicated in the precipitating events of carcinogenesis. Molecular agents in anti-cancer therapies frequently target biological pathways responsible for the regulation and coordination of cell cycle division. Although cell cycle kinetics tend to vary according to cell type, the distribution of cells amongst the four stages of the cell cycle is rather consistent within a particular cell line due to the consistent pattern of mitogen and growth factor expression. Genotoxic events and other cellular stressors can result in a temporary block of cell cycle progression, resulting in arrest or a temporary pause in a particular cell cycle phase to allow for instigation of the appropriate response mechanism. The ability to experimentally observe the behavior of a cell population with reference to their cell cycle progression stage is an important advance in cell biology. Common procedures such as mitotic shake off, differential centrifugation or flow cytometry-based sorting are used to isolate cells at specific stages of the cell cycle. These fractionated, cell cycle phase-enriched populations are then subjected to experimental treatments. Yield, purity and viability of the separated fractions can often be compromised using these physical separation methods. As well, the time lapse between separation of the cell populations and the start of experimental treatment, whereby the fractionated cells can progress from the selected cell cycle stage, can pose significant challenges in the successful implementation and interpretation of these experiments. Other approaches to study cell cycle stages include the use of chemicals to synchronize cells. Treatment of cells with chemical inhibitors of key metabolic processes for each cell cycle stage are useful in blocking the progression of the cell cycle to the next stage. For example, the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor hydroxyurea halts cells at the G1/S juncture by limiting the supply of deoxynucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. Other notable chemicals include treatment with aphidicolin, a polymerase alpha inhibitor for G1 arrest, treatment with colchicine and nocodazole, both of which interfere with mitotic spindle formation to halt cells in M phase and finally, treatment with the DNA chain terminator 5-fluorodeoxyridine to initiate S phase arrest. Treatment with these chemicals is an effective means of synchronizing an entire population of cells at a particular phase. With removal of the chemical, cells rejoin the cell cycle in unison. Treatment of the test agent following release from the cell cycle blocking chemical ensures that the drug response elicited is from a uniform, cell cycle stage-specific population. However, since many of the chemical synchronizers are known genotoxic compounds, teasing apart the participation of various response pathways (to the synchronizers vs. the test agents) is challenging. Here we describe a metabolic labeling method for following a subpopulation of actively cycling cells through their progression from the DNA replication phase, through to the division and separation of their daughter cells. Coupled with flow cytometry quantification, this protocol enables for measurement of kinetic progression of the cell cycle in the absence of either mechanically- or chemically- induced cellular stresses commonly associated with other cell cycle synchronization methodologies. In the following sections we will discuss the methodology, as well as some of its applications in biomedical research.     

HTm4基因在造血细胞周期调控中的作用

为了研究HTm4基因在造血细胞细胞周期调控中的作用,以佛波酯(phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate,PMA)诱导K562细胞分化为模型,利用流式细胞术(FACS)及半定量RT-PCR对分化过程中细胞周期的变化及HTm4基因的表达进行了分析,并利用Tet-Off调控表达系统,将HTm4基因以及C端功能域缺失的HTm4-ct转染K562细胞,观察对细胞周期的影响。结果表明,PMA同时引起了K562细胞的增殖和分化,G0／G1期细胞的比例以及HTm4基因的表达均呈现出波浪形的变化趋势,说明HTm4基因可能参与了细胞退出细胞周期的过程。HTm4基因转染后引起K562细胞滞留于G0／G1期,但C端功能域缺失的HTm4-ct没有此作用,说明C端功能域在HTm4基因调控细胞周期的功能中发挥重要作用。     

Cell cycle-dependent regulation of store-operated I(CRAC) and Mg2+-nucleotide-regulated MagNuM (TRPM7) currents

Calcium signaling is a central mechanism for numerous cellular functions and particularly relevant for immune cell proliferation. However, the role of calcium influx in mitotic cell cycle progression is largely unknown. We here report that proliferating rat mast cells RBL-2H3 tightly control their major store-operated calcium influx pathway, I(CRAC), during cell cycle progression. While I(CRAC) is maintained at control levels during the first gap phase (G1), the current is significantly up-regulated in preparation for and during chromatin duplication. However, mitosis strongly suppresses I(CRAC). Non-proliferating cells deprived of growth hormones strongly down-regulate I(CRAC) while increasing cell volume. We further show that the other known calcium (and magnesium) influx pathway in mast cells, the TRPM7-like magnesium-nucleotide-regulated metal (MagNuM) current, is largely uncoupled from cell cycle regulation except in G1. Taken together, our results demonstrate that both store-operated calcium influx via I(CRAC) and MagNuM are regulated at crucial checkpoints during cell cycle progression.     

On the role of TRPC1 in control of Ca2+ influx, cell volume, and cell cycle

Ca(+) signaling plays a crucial role in control of cell cycle progression, but the understanding of the dynamics of Ca(2+) influx and release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores during the cell cycle is far from complete. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the free extracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](o)) in cell proliferation, the pattern of changes in the free intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) during cell cycle progression, and the role of the transient receptor potential (TRP)C1 in these changes as well as in cell cycle progression and cell volume regulation. In Ehrlich Lettré Ascites (ELA) cells, [Ca(2+)](i) decreased significantly, and the thapsigargin-releasable Ca(2+) pool in the intracellular stores increased in G(1) as compared with G(0). Store-depletion-operated Ca(2+) entry (SOCE) and TRPC1 protein expression level were both higher in G(1) than in G(0) and S phase, in parallel with a more effective volume regulation after swelling [regulatory volume decrease (RVD)] in G(1) as compared with S phase. Furthermore, reduction of [Ca(2+)](o), as well as two unspecific SOCE inhibitors, 2-APB (2-aminoethyldiphenyl borinate) and SKF96365 (1-(β-[3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)propoxyl-4-methoxyphenethyl)1H-imidazole-hydrochloride), inhibited ELA cell proliferation. Finally, Madin-Darby canine kidney cells in which TRPC1 was stably silenced [TRPC1 knockdown (TRPC1-KD) MDCK] exhibited reduced SOCE, slower RVD, and reduced cell proliferation compared with mock controls. In conclusion, in ELA cells, SOCE and TRPC1 both seem to be upregulated in G(1) as compared with S phase, concomitant with an increased rate of RVD. Furthermore, TRPC1-KD MDCK cells exhibit decreased SOCE, decreased RVD, and decreased proliferation, suggesting that, at least in certain cell types, TRPC1 is regulated during cell cycle progression and is involved in SOCE, RVD, and cell proliferation.     

Restriction Endonucleases from Invasive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Cause Double-Strand Breaks and Distort Mitosis in Epithelial Cells during Infection

The host epithelium is both a barrier against, and the target for microbial infections. Maintaining regulated cell growth ensures an intact protective layer towards microbial-induced cellular damage. Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections disrupt host cell cycle regulation machinery and the infection causes DNA double strand breaks that delay progression through the G2/M phase. We show that intracellular gonococci upregulate and release restriction endonucleases that enter the nucleus and damage human chromosomal DNA. Bacterial lysates containing restriction endonucleases were able to fragment genomic DNA as detected by PFGE. Lysates were also microinjected into the cytoplasm of cells in interphase and after 20 h, DNA double strand breaks were identified by 53BP1 staining. In addition, by using live-cell microscopy and NHS-ester stained live gonococci we visualized the subcellular location of the bacteria upon mitosis. Infected cells show dysregulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint proteins MAD1 and MAD2, impaired and prolonged M-phase, nuclear swelling, micronuclei formation and chromosomal instability. These data highlight basic molecular functions of how gonococcal infections affect host cell cycle regulation, cause DNA double strand breaks and predispose cellular malignancies.