Genetic and molecular evidence that the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector protein AvrRpt2 is a cysteine protease

Upon delivery to the plant cell during infection, the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrRpt2 undergoes proteolytic processing, enhances pathogen virulence and causes the elimination of the Arabidopsis RIN4 protein. A structure-prediction method was employed in order to investigate possible biochemical functions of AvrRpt2. Results of a secondary structure prediction algorithm suggest that the functional C-terminal portion of AvrRpt2 is a cysteine protease. Mutation of predicted catalytic residues within this portion of AvrRpt2 abolished in planta processing, elimination of Arabidopsis RIN4, and the ability to trigger an RPS2-specific resistance response. These data indicate that AvrRpt2 is most likely a sequence divergent cysteine protease whose activity is required for elimination of RIN4 during infection.     

Molecular basis for the RIN4 negative regulation of RPS2 disease resistance

Recent studies have demonstrated that RPS2, a plasma membrane-localized nucleotide binding site/leucine-rich repeat protein from Arabidopsis thaliana, associates with RPM1 Interacting Protein 4 (RIN4) and that this association functions to modulate the RPS2-mediated defense pathway in response to the bacterial effector protein AvrRpt2. In addition to negatively regulating RPS2 activity, RIN4 is also a target of AvrRpt2, a Cys protease and cognate bacterial effector protein of RPS2. Nicotiana benthamiana has been employed as a heterologous expression system to characterize the RPS2-RIN4 association, defining the domains in RIN4 required for the negative regulation of RPS2 activity. Upon inoculation of N. benthamiana leaves with Agrobacterium tumefaciens expressing RPS2, a rapid hypersensitive response (HR) is detected with 22 h of infiltration. The HR can be blocked by infiltrating the leaf with A. tumefaciens expressing RPS2 in the presence of RIN4, recapitulating the ability of RIN4 to interfere with RPS2-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Moreover, in the presence of RIN4, the RPS2-mediated HR can be restored by the delivery of AvrRpt2 via A. tumefaciens. This assay has been developed as a phenotypic marker for (1) the HR-inducing phenotype associated with RPS2, (2) negative regulation of RPS2 by RIN4, and (3) the AvrRpt2-mediated disappearance of RIN4. Here, we present a series of deletion and site-directed mutation analyses to identify amino acids in RIN4 required for the RPS2-RIN4 association and to distinguish these from residues in RIN4 that serve as a target sequence for AvrRpt2. In addition to characterizing the RPS2-RIN4 association in N. benthamiana, we have moved forward to show that the biological relevance of these amino acid changes is applicable in Arabidopsis as well. To this end, we have identified specific amino acids within the C-terminal half of RIN4 that are required for RPS2 regulation and association.     

A plant effector‐triggered immunity signaling sector is inhibited by pattern‐triggered immunity

Since signaling machineries for two modes of plant‐induced immunity, pattern‐triggered immunity (PTI) and effector‐triggered immunity (ETI), extensively overlap, PTI and ETI signaling likely interact. In an Arabidopsis quadruple mutant, in which four major sectors of the signaling network, jasmonate, ethylene, PAD4, and salicylate, are disabled, the hypersensitive response (HR) typical of ETI is abolished when the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpt2 is bacterially delivered but is intact when AvrRpt2 is directly expressed in planta. These observations led us to discovery of a network‐buffered signaling mechanism that mediates HR signaling and is strongly inhibited by PTI signaling. We named this mechanism the ETI‐Mediating and PTI‐Inhibited Sector (EMPIS). The signaling kinetics of EMPIS explain apparently different plant genetic requirements for ETI triggered by different effectors without postulating different signaling machineries. The properties of EMPIS suggest that information about efficacy of the early immune response is fed back to the immune signaling network, modulating its activity and limiting the fitness cost of unnecessary immune responses.     

Initiation of RPS2-specified disease resistance in Arabidopsis is coupled to the AvrRpt2-directed elimination of RIN4

Plants have evolved a sophisticated innate immune system to recognize invading pathogens and to induce a set of host defense mechanisms resulting in disease resistance. Pathogen recognition is often mediated by plant disease resistance (R) proteins that respond specifically to one or a few pathogen-derived molecules. This specificity has led to suggestions of a receptor-ligand mode of R protein function. Delivery of the bacterial effector protein AvrRpt2 by Pseudomonas syringae specifically induces disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants expressing the RPS2 R protein. We demonstrate that RPS2 physically interacts with Arabidopsis RIN4 and that AvrRpt2 causes the elimination of RIN4 during activation of the RPS2 pathway. AvrRpt2-mediated RIN4 elimination also occurs in the rps2, ndr1, and Atrar1 mutant backgrounds, demonstrating that this activity can be achieved independent of an RPS2-mediated signaling pathway. Therefore, we suggest that RPS2 initiates signaling based upon perception of RIN4 disappearance rather than direct recognition of AvrRpt2.     

Mutations in the Pseudomonas syringae avrRpt2 gene that dissociate its virulence and avirulence activities lead to decreased efficiency in AvrRpt2-induced disappearance of RIN4

The avrRpt2 gene from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato exhibits avirulence activity on Arabidopsis expressing the resistance gene RPS2 but promotes bacterial virulence on susceptible rps2 Arabidopsis. To understand the functional relationship between the avirulence and virulence activities of avrRpt2, we analyzed a series of six avrRpt2 mutants deficient in eliciting the RPS2-dependent hypersensitive response. We show that the mutants are also severely impaired in triggering RSP2-dependent resistance. Four of these mutants are severely impaired in their virulence activity, whereas two alleles, encoding C-terminal deletions of AvrRpt2, retain significant but slightly reduced virulence activity. Thus, the avirulence and virulence activities of avrRpt2 can be genetically uncoupled. We tested the ability of the two C-terminal deletion mutants to trigger AvrRpt2-induced elimination of the Arabidopsis RIN4 protein and show that they retain this activity but are less efficient than wild-type AvrRpt2. Thus, reduced AvrRpt2 virulence activity is correlated with reduced efficiency in the induction of RIN4 disappearance. This suggests that an alteration in kinetics of RIN4 disappearance triggered by the C-terminal deletion mutants may provide the mechanistic basis for the uncoupling of the avirulence and virulence activities of avrRpt2.     

Plant targets for Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors: virulence targets or guarded decoys?

The phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae can suppress both pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) by the injection of type III effector (T3E) proteins into host cells. T3Es achieve immune suppression using a variety of strategies including interference with immune receptor signaling, blocking RNA pathways and vesicle trafficking, and altering organelle function. T3Es can be recognized indirectly by resistance proteins monitoring specific T3E targets resulting in ETI. It is presently unclear whether the monitored targets represent bona fide virulence targets or guarded decoys. Extensive overlap between PTI and ETI signaling suggests that T3Es may suppress both pathways through common targets and by possessing multiple activities.     

Plant immunity: Evolutionary insights from PBS1, Pto and RIN4

Two layers of plant immune systems are used by plants to defend against phytopathogens. The first layer is pathogen-associate molecular patterns (PAMPs)-triggered immunity (PTI), which is activated by plant cell-surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) upon perception of microbe general elicitors. The second layer is effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which is initiated by specific recognition of pathogen type III secreted effectors (T3SEs) with plant intracellular resistance (R) proteins. Current opinions agree that ETI was evolved from PTI, and the impetus for the evolution of plant immunity is pathogen T3SEs, which exhibit virulence functions through blocking PTI, but show avirulence functions for triggering ETI. A decoy model was put forward and explained that the avirulence targets of pathogen T3SEs were evolved as decoys to compete with the virulence targets for binding with pathogen T3SEs. However, little direct evidence for the evolutionary mode has been offered. Here we reviewed the recent progresses about Pto, PBS1 and RIN4 to present our viewpoints about the evolution of plant immunity.Key words: plant immunity, evolution, Pto, PBS1, RIN4     

Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola effector HopF1 inhibits pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in a RIN4-independent manner in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Plant pathogens usually promote pathogenesis by secreting effector proteins into host plant cells. One of the secreted effectors of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola, the causative agent of halo-blight disease in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), HopF1, activates effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in a bean cultivar containing R1 resistance gene, but displays virulence function in a bean cultivar without the R1 gene. The virulence mechanism of the effector remained unknown, although it was identified more than a decade ago. Here we demonstrated that HopF1 can inhibit pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) in a susceptible bean cultivar Tendergreen. HopF1 directly interacted with two RPM1-interacting protein 4 (RIN4) orthologs of bean, PvRIN4a and PvRIN4b. Like RIN4 in Arabidopsis, both PvRIN4 orthologs negatively regulated the PTI responses in bean. However, the virulence function of HopF1 was enhanced in Tendergreen silencing PvRIN4. Furthermore, silencing PvRIN4a compromised the avrβ1-induced hypersensitive response (HR), which previously was reported to be suppressed by HopF1. Together, these results demonstrated that PvRIN4 orthologs were not the virulence target of HopF1 for inhibiting PTI, but probably for interfering with ETI.     

Two Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors inhibit RIN4-regulated basal defense in Arabidopsis

Plant cells have two defense systems that detect bacterial pathogens. One is a basal defense system that recognizes complex pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). A second system uses disease-resistance (R) proteins to recognize type lll effector proteins that are delivered into the plant cell by the pathogen's type III secretion system. Here we show that these two pathways are linked. We find that two Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors, AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1, inhibit PAMP-induced signaling and thus compromise the host's basal defense system. RIN4 is an Arabidopsis protein targeted by AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1 for degradation and phosphorylation, respectively. We find that RIN4 is itself a regulator of PAMP signaling. The R proteins, RPS2 and RPM1, sense type III effector-induced perturbations of RIN4. Thus, R proteins guard the plant against type III effectors that inhibit PAMP signaling and provide a mechanistic link between the two plant defense systems.     

Membrane release and destabilization of Arabidopsis RIN4 following cleavage by Pseudomonas syringae AvrRpt2

The Arabidopsis RIN4 protein mediates interaction between the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector proteins AvrB, AvrRpm1, and AvrRpt2 and the Arabidopsis disease-resistance proteins RPM1 and RPS2. Confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy following particle bombardment of tobacco leaf epidermal cells was used to examine the subcellular localization of fusions between GFP and RIN4 or several of its homologs and to examine the effects of cobombardment with AvrRpt2 or AvrRpml. This study showed that RIN4 was attached to the plasma membrane at its carboxyl terminus and that a carboxyl-terminal CCCFxFxxx prenylation or acylation (typically palmitoylation) motif, or both, was essential for this attachment. RIN4 was cleaved by AvrRpt2 at two PxFGxW motifs, one releasing a large portion of RIN4 from the plasma membrane and both exposing amino-terminal residues that destabilized the carboxyl-terminal cleavage products by targeting them for N-end ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Plasma-membrane localization of RIN4 was not affected by AvrRpml. RIN4 was found to be part of a protein family comprising two full-length homologs and at least 11 short carboxyl-terminal homologs. Representatives of this family, comprising a full-length RIN4 homolog and two short carboxyl-terminal RIN4 homologs, were also attached to the plasma membrane and cleaved near their amino termini by AvrRpt2, but in contrast to RIN4, the major portions of these proteins remained on the plasma membrane. N-end degradation may play a minor role in RIN4 degradation but probably plays a major role in the degradation of RIN4 homologs and is, therefore, a major pathogenic consequence of AvrRpt2 cleavage.     

Analysis of new type III effectors from Xanthomonas uncovers XopB and XopS as suppressors of plant immunity

? The pathogenicity of the Gram-negative plant-pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) is dependent on type III effectors (T3Es) that are injected into plant cells by a type III secretion system and interfere with cellular processes to the benefit of the pathogen. ? In this study, we analyzed eight T3Es from Xcv strain 85-10, six of which were newly identified effectors. Genetic studies and protoplast expression assays revealed that XopB and XopS contribute to disease symptoms and bacterial growth, and suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered plant defense gene expression. ? In addition, XopB inhibits cell death reactions induced by different T3Es, thus suppressing defense responses related to both PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). ? XopB localizes to the Golgi apparatus and cytoplasm of the plant cell and interferes with eukaryotic vesicle trafficking. Interestingly, a XopB point mutant derivative was defective in the suppression of ETI-related responses, but still interfered with vesicle trafficking and was only slightly affected with regard to the suppression of defense gene induction. This suggests that XopB-mediated suppression of PTI and ETI is dependent on different mechanisms that can be functionally separated.     

Phytophthora infestans RXLR-WY Effector AVR3a Associates with Dynamin-Related Protein 2 Required for Endocytosis of the Plant Pattern Recognition Receptor FLS2

Pathogens utilize effectors to suppress basal plant defense known as PTI (Pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity). However, our knowledge of PTI suppression by filamentous plant pathogens, i.e. fungi and oomycetes, remains fragmentary. Previous work revealed that the co-receptor BAK1/SERK3 contributes to basal immunity against the potato pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Moreover BAK1/SERK3 is required for the cell death induced by P. infestans elicitin INF1, a protein with characteristics of PAMPs. The P. infestans host-translocated RXLR-WY effector AVR3a is known to supress INF1-mediated cell death by binding the plant E3 ligase CMPG1. In contrast, AVR3a^KI-Y147del, a deletion mutant of the C-terminal tyrosine of AVR3a, fails to bind CMPG1 and does not suppress INF1-mediated cell death. Here, we studied the extent to which AVR3a and its variants perturb additional BAK1/SERK3-dependent PTI responses in N. benthamiana using the elicitor/receptor pair flg22/FLS2 as a model. We found that all tested variants of AVR3a suppress defense responses triggered by flg22 and reduce internalization of activated FLS2. Moreover, we discovered that AVR3a associates with the Dynamin-Related Protein 2 (DRP2), a plant GTPase implicated in receptor-mediated endocytosis. Interestingly, silencing of DRP2 impaired ligand-induced FLS2 internalization but did not affect internalization of the growth receptor BRI1. Our results suggest that AVR3a associates with a key cellular trafficking and membrane-remodeling complex involved in immune receptor-mediated endocytosis. We conclude that AVR3a is a multifunctional effector that can suppress BAK1/SERK3-mediated immunity through at least two different pathways.     

The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 promotes virulence independently of RIN4, a predicted virulence target in Arabidopsis thaliana

AvrRpt2, an effector protein from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst), behaves as an avirulence factor that activates resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana lines expressing the resistance gene RPS2. AvrRpt2 can also enhance pathogen fitness by promoting the ability of the bacteria to grow and to cause disease on susceptible lines of A. thaliana that lack functional RPS2. The activation of RPS2 is coupled to the AvrRpt2-induced disappearance of the A. thaliana RIN4 protein. However, the significance of this RIN4 elimination to AvrRpt2 virulence function is unresolved. To clarify our understanding of the contribution of RIN4 disappearance to AvrRpt2 virulence function, we generated new avrRpt2 alleles by random mutagenesis. We show that the ability of six novel AvrRpt2 mutants to induce RIN4 disappearance correlated well with their avirulence activities but not with their virulence activities. Moreover, the virulence activity of wild-type AvrRpt2 was detectable in an A. thaliana line lacking RIN4. Collectively, these results indicate that the virulence activity of AvrRpt2 in A. thaliana is likely to rely on the modification of host susceptibility factors other than, or in addition to, RIN4.     

Pattern-Triggered Immunity Suppresses Programmed Cell Death Triggered by Fumonisin B1

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a crucial process for plant innate immunity and development. In plant innate immunity, PCD is believed to prevent the spread of pathogens from the infection site. Although proper control of PCD is important for plant fitness, we have limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating plant PCD. Plant innate immunity triggered by recognition of effectors (effector-triggered immunity, ETI) is often associated with PCD. However pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), which is triggered by recognition of elicitors called microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), is not. Therefore we hypothesized that PTI might suppress PCD. Here we report that PCD triggered by the mycotoxin fumonisin B1 (FB1) can be suppressed by PTI in Arabidopsis. FB1-triggered cell death was suppressed by treatment with the MAMPs flg22 (a part of bacterial flagellin) or elf18 (a part of the bacterial elongation factor EF-Tu) but not chitin (a component of fungal cell walls). Although plant hormone signaling is associated with PCD and PTI, both FB1-triggered cell death and suppression of cell death by flg22 treatment were still observed in mutants deficient in jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling. The MAP kinases MPK3 and MPK6 are transiently activated and inactivated within one hour during PTI. We found that FB1 activated MPK3 and MPK6 about 36–48 hours after treatment. Interestingly, this late activation was attenuated by flg22 treatment. These results suggest that PTI suppression of FB1-triggered cell death may involve suppression of MPK3/MPK6 signaling but does not require JA/ET/SA signaling.     

Network Properties of Robust Immunity in Plants

Two modes of plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens, Effector Triggered Immunity (ETI) and Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI), are triggered by recognition of pathogen effectors and Microbe-Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs), respectively. Although the jasmonic acid (JA)/ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) signaling sectors are generally antagonistic and important for immunity against necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens, respectively, their precise roles and interactions in ETI and PTI have not been clear. We constructed an Arabidopsis dde2/ein2/pad4/sid2-quadruple mutant. DDE2, EIN2, and SID2 are essential components of the JA, ET, and SA sectors, respectively. The pad4 mutation affects the SA sector and a poorly characterized sector. Although the ETI triggered by the bacterial effector AvrRpt2 (AvrRpt2-ETI) and the PTI triggered by the bacterial MAMP flg22 (flg22-PTI) were largely intact in plants with mutations in any one of these genes, they were mostly abolished in the quadruple mutant. For the purposes of this study, AvrRpt2-ETI and flg22-PTI were measured as relative growth of Pseudomonas syringae bacteria within leaves. Immunity to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola was also severely compromised in the quadruple mutant. Quantitative measurements of the immunity levels in all combinatorial mutants and wild type allowed us to estimate the effects of the wild-type genes and their interactions on the immunity by fitting a mixed general linear model. This signaling allocation analysis showed that, contrary to current ideas, each of the JA, ET, and SA signaling sectors can positively contribute to immunity against both biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. The analysis also revealed that while flg22-PTI and AvrRpt2-ETI use a highly overlapping signaling network, the way they use the common network is very different: synergistic relationships among the signaling sectors are evident in PTI, which may amplify the signal; compensatory relationships among the sectors dominate in ETI, explaining the robustness of ETI against genetic and pathogenic perturbations.     

Arabidopsis RIN4 negatively regulates disease resistance mediated by RPS2 and RPM1 downstream or independent of the NDR1 signal modulator and is not required for the virulence functions of bacterial type III effectors AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1

Bacterial pathogens deliver type III effector proteins into the plant cell during infection. On susceptible (r) hosts, type III effectors can contribute to virulence. Some trigger the action of specific disease resistance (R) gene products. The activation of R proteins can occur indirectly via modification of a host target. Thus, at least some type III effectors are recognized at site(s) where they may act as virulence factors. These data indicate that a type III effector's host target might be required for both initiation of R function in resistant plants and pathogen virulence in susceptible plants. In Arabidopsis thaliana, RPM1-interacting protein 4 (RIN4) associates with both the Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola 1 (RPM1) and Resistance to P. syringae 2 (RPS2) disease resistance proteins. RIN4 is posttranslationally modified after delivery of the P. syringae type III effectors AvrRpm1, AvrB, or AvrRpt2 to plant cells. Thus, RIN4 may be a target for virulence functions of these type III effectors. We demonstrate that RIN4 is not the only host target for AvrRpm1 and AvrRpt2 in susceptible plants because its elimination does not diminish their virulence functions. In fact, RIN4 negatively regulates AvrRpt2 virulence function. RIN4 also negatively regulates inappropriate activation of both RPM1 and RPS2. Inappropriate activation of RPS2 is nonspecific disease resistance 1 (NDR1) independent, in contrast with the established requirement for NDR1 during AvrRpt2-dependent RPS2 activation. Thus, RIN4 acts either cooperatively, downstream, or independently of NDR1 to negatively regulate RPS2 in the absence of pathogen. We propose that many P. syringae type III effectors have more than one target in the host cell. We suggest that a limited set of these targets, perhaps only one, are associated with R proteins. Thus, whereas any pathogen virulence factor may have multiple targets, the perturbation of only one is necessary and sufficient for R activation.     

NDR1 interaction with RIN4 mediates the differential activation of multiple disease resistance pathways in Arabidopsis

Recognition of pathogens by plants involves the coordinated efforts of molecular chaperones, disease resistance (R) proteins, and components of disease resistance signaling pathways. Characterization of events associated with pathogen perception in Arabidopsis thaliana has advanced understanding of molecular genetic mechanisms associated with disease resistance and protein interactions critical for the activation of resistance signaling. Regulation of R protein-mediated signaling in response to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis involves the physical association of at least two R proteins with the negative regulator RPM1 INTERACTING PROTEIN4 (RIN4). While the RIN4-RPS2 (for RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE2) and RIN4-RPM1 (for RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA1) signaling pathways exhibit differential mechanisms of activation in terms of effector action, the requirement for NON-RACE-SPECIFIC DISEASE RESISTANCE1 (NDR1) is shared. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, followed by a series of coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we demonstrate that the RIN4-NDR1 interaction occurs on the cytoplasmically localized N-terminal portion of NDR1 and that this interaction is required for the activation of resistance signaling following infection by P. syringae expressing the Cys protease Type III effector protein AvrRpt2. We demonstrate that like RPS2 and RPM1, NDR1 also associates with RIN4 in planta. We suggest that this interaction serves to further regulate activation of disease resistance signaling following recognition of P. syringae DC3000-AvrRpt2 by Arabidopsis.     

Plant Immunity Directly or Indirectly Restricts the Injection of Type III Effectors by the Pseudomonas syringae Type III Secretion System

Plants perceive microorganisms by recognizing microbial molecules known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) inducing PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) or by recognizing pathogen effectors inducing effector-triggered immunity (ETI). The hypersensitive response (HR), a programmed cell death response associated with ETI, is known to be inhibited by PTI. Here, we show that PTI-induced HR inhibition is due to direct or indirect restriction of the type III protein secretion system''s (T3SS) ability to inject type III effectors (T3Es). We found that the Pseudomonas syringae T3SS was restricted in its ability to inject a T3E-adenylate cyclase (CyaA) injection reporter into PTI-induced tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) cells. We confirmed this restriction with a direct injection assay that monitored the in planta processing of the AvrRpt2 T3E. Virulent P. syringae strains were able to overcome a PAMP pretreatment in tobacco or Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and continue to inject a T3E-CyaA reporter into host cells. In contrast, ETI-inducing P. syringae strains were unable to overcome PTI-induced injection restriction. A P. syringae pv tomato DC3000 mutant lacking about one-third of its T3E inventory was less capable of injecting into PTI-induced Arabidopsis plant cells, grew poorly in planta, and did not cause disease symptoms. PTI-induced transgenic Arabidopsis expressing the T3E HopAO1 or HopF2 allowed higher amounts of the T3E-CyaA reporter to be injected into plant cells compared to wild-type plants. Our results show that PTI-induced HR inhibition is due to direct or indirect restriction of T3E injection and that T3Es can relieve this restriction by suppressing PTI.Plants come into contact with a myriad of microorganisms and rely on their innate immune systems to perceive potential microbial infections and induce immune responses. Plant innate immunity can be broadly portrayed as consisting of two major branches, distinguished primarily by their mode of microbe detection. The first branch is activated by extracellular pattern recognition receptors (Boller and Felix, 2009; Nicaise et al., 2009) that perceive broadly conserved molecules called pathogen (microbe)-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Medzhitov and Janeway, 1997; Ausubel, 2005). The response induced by this recognition is termed PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI; Jones and Dangl, 2006). A well-characterized example of PTI in plants is the recognition of and subsequent immune response to a small N-terminal region of bacterial flagellin by the FLS2 receptor kinase of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Felix et al., 1999; Zipfel et al., 2004). Plant resistance (R) proteins activate the second branch of the plant innate immune system by recognizing specific pathogen effector proteins. The response induced by this recognition is termed effector-triggered immunity (ETI; Jones and Dangl, 2006). ETI and PTI induce similar innate immune responses, including ion fluxes, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and callose (β-1,3-glucan) deposition in the cell wall (Tsuda et al., 2008; Boller and Felix, 2009); however, ETI generally also includes the induction of a programmed cell death called the hypersensitive response (HR; Heath, 2000).The induction of ETI in response to a bacterial plant pathogen is generally due to the recognition of bacterial type III effector (T3E) proteins injected into the plant cell by the pathogen''s type III protein secretion system (T3SS; Alfano and Collmer, 1997; Buttner and He, 2009). These recognized T3Es were classically known as avirulence (Avr) proteins because they induced ETI responses sufficient to prevent a normally virulent pathogen from causing disease, thereby rendering it avirulent (Leach and White, 1996). However, it has become increasingly apparent that many T3Es benefit their bacteria by suppressing PTI and ETI (Block et al., 2008; Cui et al., 2009; Guo et al., 2009). Under the current model, plants first developed PTI to reduce microbial colonization of the apoplast. Successful bacterial pathogens countered this by acquiring a T3SS and PTI-suppressing T3Es (Espinosa and Alfano, 2004; Chisholm et al., 2006; Jones and Dangl, 2006).The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae infects the aerial parts of many plant species. It displays host specificity, and its strains have been separated into more than 50 pathovars based on the host plants that they infect. For example, P. syringae pv tabaci is virulent in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), but it triggers nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis, a plant-microbe interaction referred to as a nonhost interaction. Nonhost resistance describes the resistance observed when all members of a plant species are resistant to a specific pathogen (Thordal-Christensen, 2003; Mysore and Ryu, 2004). While not well understood, both PTI (Li et al., 2005) and ETI (Nissan et al., 2006; Wei et al., 2007) have been shown to play a role in nonhost resistance to bacterial pathogens. In some cases, P. syringae strains display race cultivar resistance. This is generally due to the resistant cultivar possessing an R protein that can recognize a T3E from the pathogen inducing ETI (Bent and Mackey, 2007). One well-studied P. syringae strain is P. syringae pv tomato DC3000, which causes bacterial speck disease on specific tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars and disease on all ecotypes of Arabidopsis tested. These interactions have been classically referred to as compatible interactions. However, DC3000 triggers nonhost resistance in tobacco and many other plants.DC3000 contains more than 30 T3Es (Lindeberg et al., 2006; Cui et al., 2009; Cunnac et al., 2009). These are encoded by genes contained within the Hrp pathogenicity island, which also encodes the T3SS apparatus (Alfano et al., 2000), other pathogenicity islands, or as individual genes throughout the genome of DC3000 (Buell et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2007). One molecular tool that has been useful in studying the effect individual T3Es have on plants is the cosmid pHIR11 (Huang et al., 1988). This cosmid encodes a functional T3SS from P. syringae pv syringae 61 and the T3E HopA1. It confers upon nonpathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas fluorescens, the ability to inject HopA1 into plant cells. In tobacco and other plants, injected HopA1 induces ETI, including an HR (Huang et al., 1988; Alfano et al., 1997). The expression of other T3Es in P. fluorescens(pHIR11) enabled them to be screened for the ability to suppress HopA1-induced ETI (Jamir et al., 2004; Guo et al., 2009). Bacterial strains carrying the pHIR11 derivatives pLN18 or pLN1965, both of which lack hopA1 and so no longer induce ETI, were used to determine which T3Es could suppress PTI (Oh and Collmer, 2005; Guo et al., 2009). Collectively, these experiments demonstrated that many P. syringae T3Es possessed the ability to suppress both ETI and PTI.One PTI suppression assay using P. fluorescens(pLN18) employed by Oh and Collmer (2005) took advantage of earlier observations indicating that PTI could inhibit the ability of the plant to mount an HR in response to an ETI-inducing bacterial strain (Newman et al., 2000; Klement et al., 2003). In this assay, the PTI inducers P. fluorescens(pLN18) or a 22-amino-acid peptide from flagellin (flg22) are infiltrated into Nicotiana benthamiana. Six hours later, the ETI inducer DC3000 is infiltrated in a region of the leaf that overlaps with the earlier infiltration. The HR is typically inhibited in the overlapping region that was pretreated with a PTI inducer. Several T3Es suppressed this inhibition when they were separately delivered at time of pretreatment (Oh and Collmer, 2005). It has been speculated that the probable mechanisms for inhibition of the HR caused by PTI include impairment of delivery of T3Es that induce the HR, modification of the events downstream of T3E recognition, or a shutdown of programmed cell death (Newman et al., 2000).Here, we show that PTI inhibits the HR on tobacco because it directly or indirectly restricts the ability of P. fluorescens(pLN1965) or DC3000 to inject T3Es based on injection (translocation) assays using T3E-adenylate cyclase (CyaA) fusions. This was confirmed using an independent injection assay that monitored the amount of the cleaved in planta form of the T3E AvrRpt2. Interestingly, this injection restriction was greatly reduced in the compatible interactions between DC3000 and Arabidopsis or between P. syringae pv tabaci 11258 and tobacco. A DC3000 mutant lacking four clusters of T3E genes, which corresponds to 11 T3Es, was less able to inject a T3E-CyaA fusion into PTI-induced Arabidopsis, suggesting that the PTI suppressing activities of the T3E inventory of DC3000 allow it to overcome the injection restriction. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants separately expressing specific T3Es known to be capable of PTI suppression increased the ability of P. fluorescens(pLN1965) to inject a T3E-CyaA fusion into PTI-induced plant cells. Collectively, these data suggest that PTI can directly or indirectly restrict type III injection and PTI suppression by T3Es can relieve this restriction in susceptible plant cells but not plant cells undergoing ETI.     

Cleavage of the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 requires a host factor(s) common among eukaryotes and is important for AvrRpt2 localization in the host cell

Many phytopathogenic bacteria use a type III secretion system to deliver type III effector proteins into the host plant cell. The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 is cleaved at a specific site when translocated into the host cell. In this study, we first demonstrate that the factor(s) required for AvrRpt2 cleavage is present in extracts from animal and yeast cells, as well as plant cells. The cleavage factor in animal and plant cell extracts was heat labile but relatively insensitive to protease inhibitors. Second, mutational analysis of AvrRpt2 was applied to identify features important for its cleavage. In addition to two of the amino acid residues in the immediate vicinity of the cleavage site, a large part of the region C-terminal to the cleavage site was required when AvrRpt2 was cleaved in animal cell extract. Most of these features were also important when AvrRpt2 was cleaved in plant cells. Third, we investigated the effect of cleavage in interactions of AvrRpt2 with plant cells. Cleavage of AvrRpt2 appeared to be important for proper interactions with Arabidopsis cells that lack the resistance gene product corresponding to AvrRpt2, RPS2. In addition, removal of the region N-terminal to the cleavage site was important for the correct localization of the C-terminal effector region of the protein in the host cell. We speculate that the virulence function of AvrRpt2 requires removal of the N-terminal region to redirect the effector protein to a specific subcellular location in the host cell after translocation of the protein.