EFFECT OF NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER APPLIED AT DIFFERENT DATES ON TAKE-ALL, EYESPOT AND YIELD OF WINTER WHEAT GROWN ON LIGHT SANDY LOAM

In a replicated field experiment on light sandy loam at Woburn, where winter wheat is a very uncertain crop, Cappelle and Holdfast, grown after potatoes with dung, yielded 50 and 41 cwt./acre of grain, respectively, when given 6 cwt./acre of Nitro-Chalk in April, compared with 19 and 20 cwt./acre when unfertilized. The same fertilized plots yielded 29 and 19 cwt., respectively, in the second, and 25 and 17 cwt./acre, respectively, in the third year on the same land, whereas unfertilized plots of both varieties yielded only 9 and 5 cwt./acre. The decrease in mean yield from 27 cwt. in the first, to 15 and 10 cwt./acre in the second and third crops was associated with a decrease in ear number from 16.7 to 14.6 and 12.2, respectively, and with a striking decrease in weight of grain per ear, caused partly by a large increase in the proportion of small grains. Eyespot ( Cercosporella herpotrichoides Fron.) although present each year did not become prevalent; an increase in the percentage straws affected by take-all ( Ophiobolus graminis Sacc.) from 9 to 15 and 26%, respectively, and a severe increase in weed infestation ( Agrostis gigantea ) appeared to be the main factors reducing yield.
Nitro-Chalk applied in April yielded most grain every year, and wheat fertilized at this time had less eyespot and take-all than that fertilized in March. Fertilizer applied in May increased weed growth, failed to decrease take-all and yielded fewer ears, less grain, and a higher proportion of tailcorn than did earlier applications.     

Analysis of Growth and Yield of Winter and Spring Wheats

In a field experiment to investigate the physiological causesof variation in yield between autumn- and spring-sown wheatand between old and new varieties, the grain yields of the winterwheats were 3-15 per cent, greater than of the spring ones andthe new varieties Cappelle-Desprez and Jufy I yielded 40-70per cent, more than Squarehead's Master and Atle. Nitrogen fertilizerincreased the yields of Cappelle-Desprez and Jufy I more thanof Atle, and decreased the yield of Squarehead's Master by makingit lodge. Until ear emergence the winter varieties had greater leaf-areaindices (L) and dry weights, but smaller net assimilation rates(E), than the spring varieties. Square-head's Master had greaterL but smaller E, and similar dry weight to Cappelle-Desprez.Jufy I had similar E to Atlc, but greater L and dry weight.Nitrogen increased L and dry weight, but decreased E. All thedifferences in E between varieties and nitrogen treatments couldbe explained by the opposite effects on L, that is to say, thedifferences in E were caused by variation in mutual shadingarising from the differences in L and not by changes in leafphysiology. L of winter wheat reached its maximum at the end of May, butL of spring wheat continued to increase until ear emergence.Afterwards Ldecreased more rapidly for winter than for springwheat, so that eventually spring wheat had the greater L. Thesedifferences in the time changes of L partially compensated forthe shorter growth period of spring wheat, and tended to equalizethe grain yield from winter and spring sowings. After ear emergence total dry weight of winter varieties continuedto be greater than of spring ones, but the difference in dryweight of ears was much smaller because ear: shoot dry-weightratio was greater for the spring varieties. Total dry weight,ear dry weight and ear: shoot ratio were all greater in thenew than in the old varieties. Leaf area duration (D) afterear emergence was slightly greater for the winter than for thespring varieties and similar for old and new. The apparent efficiencyof this leaf area in grain production, measured by the grainleaf ratio (ratio of grain dry weight to D), was similar forwinter and spring varieties but greater for new than for old.This suggests that Cappelle-Desprez and Jufy I have higher grainyields because their ears photosynthesize more than do the earsof Squarehead's Master and Atle. Before ear emergence winter varieties had more shoots than springones, and old varieties more than new. After ear emergence therewere only small differences in numbers of ears; percentage survivalwas greater for spring than for winter and for new than forold varieties. Differences in dry weight between varieties were not causedby differences in nitrogen uptake.     

Experiments with CCC on wheat: effects of spacing, nitrogen and irrigation

In experiments with spring and winter wheat at Rothamsted and Woburn during 4 years CCC increased yield at close spacing (4 in) (10 cm) more than at usual spacing (8 in) (20 cm), but there was no interaction between spacing and yield. Some experiments tested up to 2·4 cwt/acre (300 kg/ha) N to see whether yields continued to increase with more than usual amounts of N, when CCC prevented lodging. There was no evidence of this. When a short dry spell occurred at ear emergence, yield of spring wheat was increased by 6 cwt/acre (750 kg/ha) by CCC and 10 cwt (1250 kg) by irrigation. CCC probably improves yield in these conditions because the larger root system it causes enables more ear-bearing shoots to survive. CCC increases yield in two ways, either by increasing ears or grain per ear. In an unlodged crop CCC usually makes the grains smaller, but by preventing lodging it can also increase size. Usually CCC decreases the leaf area per shoot. The flag leaf may be smaller, unchanged or larger than those of untreated plants. There was no obvious connexion between flag-leaf area and grain yield; when CCC decreased flag-leaf area duration by 25 %, grain yield was unchanged. The results suggest that using CCC gives a more than even chance of a profitable yield increase.     

EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS WHEAT CROPS, SEED-RATE AND NITROGEN ON EYESPOT, TAKE-ALL, WEEDS AND YIELDS OF TWO VARIETIES OF WINTER WHEAT: FIELD EXPERIMENT 1954-56

In a replicated field experiment mean yields of wheat from plots that, in the preceding 2 years, had carried oats, beans or potatoes were 39.2 and 42.6 cwt. per acre in 1954 for Holdfast and Cappelle, respectively; 42.8 and 55.8 in 1955 and 34.9 and 49.6 in 1956. Previous wheat crops had more effect than any other treatment in increasing the incidence of eyespot, take-all and weeds and in decreasing the number of ears per unit area and the yield of grain. In 1956 on plots carrying the first, second and third successive wheat crops the percentages of straws with eyespot were respectively 12, 54 and 42 and with take-all 0.1, 1 and 16. Cappelle was less severely infected by eyespot than Holdfast. The second and third successive wheat crops yielded an average of 23.3 cwt./acre less than the first wheat crop. Cappelle consistently yielded more than Holdfast, the mean difference being 13.8 cwt./acre after potatoes but only 3.8 cwt./acre after two wheat crops. The higher seed-rate gave an average increase in grain yield of 3.3 cwt./acre; but where eyespot and take-all were both severe the lower seed-rate yielded as much total and more dressed grain than the higher. Wheat given a spring top dressing of 6 cwt./acre Nitro-Chalk yielded an average of 4 cwt./acre more grain than wheat given 3 cwt./acre.     

The Influence of the Rht1 and Rht2 Alleles on the Growth of Wheat Stems and Ears

A field experiment was carried out with a set of near-isogenicspring wheat lines (cv. Triple Dirk) to determine the influenceof the Rht₁ and Rht₂ alleles on the partitioning of dry matterbetween the developing stem and the ear. Each line was sampledtwice weekly and dissected into its component above-ground parts.The rate of change of the dry mass of the individual plant organswas expressed as a proportion of the rate of change of the totalplant dry mass. This ratio was used to assess the relative sinkstrengths of the stem and ear during crop growth. The Rht₁ andRht₂ alleles reduced plant height, but increased grain yield.The greater yield was achieved through a greater grain numberper ear in the Rhtl line, a greater ear number per plant inthe Rht₂ line, and a greater allocation of assimilate to thedeveloping ear than to the developing stem in both Rht lines,particularly at the time of maximum stem growth (17 d beforeanthesis). From the earliest stages of detectable ear growthuntil anthesis, the ear masses per unit area of the Rht₁ andRht₂ lines exceeded that of Triple Dirk (Rht). It was not possibleto determine whether the Rht₁ and Rht₂ alleles were directlyresponsible for increasing grain number per ear and ear numberper plant, respectively, since the increase in these componentsof yield could equally be explained by a greater partitioningof assimilate to developing ears and tillers caused simply bya reduction in plant height. Triticum aestivum L., wheat Rht genes, stem and ear development, dry matter partitioning, allocation ratio     

Mitochondrial Complementation and Grain Yield in Hybrid Wheat

ADP/O ratios, cytochrome c oxidase and adenosine triphosphatasehave been measured in mitochondria and mixtures of mitochondriaisolated from two day-old shoots of wheat of known F₁ hybridgrain yield performance. Mixtures of mitochondria from two varieties,Peko and Cappelle-Desprez, which have considerable F₁ hybridyield heterosis, showed a significantly increased ADP/O ratioover the mean value for mitochondria from the varieties assayedindividually, i.e. these varieties showed ‘mitochondrialcomplementation’. No mitochondrial complementation wasdetected for cytochrome c oxidase or adenosine triphosphatase.In other mitochondrial mixtures no complementation in ADP/Oratios were found even when the varieties showed F₁ hybrid yieldheterosis. Mitochondrial ADP/O ratios were studied in six varietiesindividually and in mixtures. In only one mixture was any significantcomplementation detected. However, when all the results wereconsidered together, mitochondrial complementation was significantlycorrelated with F₁ hybrid grain yield heterosis when the plantswere grown at a low seed density but not at a high seed density.New hypotheses are offered to account for mitochondrial complementationand its statistical relationship with yield heterosis.     

Growth, Development, and Yield of Spring Wheat in Artificial Climates

Spring wheat was grown to maturity in three growth rooms providing:(a) 18 h of light at 20° C and 6 h of darkness at 15°C (hot long days, HL); (b) 18 h of light at 15° C and 6h of darkness at 15° C (cold long days, CL); (c) 14 h lightat 20° C and 10 h of darkness at 15° C (hot short days,HS). Plants were moved between environments at spikelet initiationand anthesis, so dividing the growth period into three. Meanlengths in days of these periods in the different environmentswere: Period 1: HL 16, CL 18, HS 25; Period 2: HL 42, CL andHS 61; Period3: HL 53, CL 83, HS 63. The length of periods 2and 3 also depended on previous treatments. Grain dry weight was affected by environmental differences inall periods and effects in successive periods were additive.Compared with HL, CL or HS in period I before initiation increasedgrain yield by 6 per cent by increasing grain number per ear,HS in period 2 between initiation and anthesis decreased itby 24 per cent by decreasing the number of grains per spikeletand the proportion of spikelets that contained grain; CL inperiod 2 increased it by 21 per cent by increasing the numberof ears; CL in period 3 after anthesis increased it by 16 percent because leaves died later; HS in period 3 decreased itby 14 per cent because there was less radiation and hence lessphotosynthesis. Dry weight of shoot and root at maturity wasincreased by CL or HS in periods 1 or 2, and increased by CLand decreased by HS in period 3. The effects on final yieldof treatment during periods 1 and 2 were the consequence ofsimilar effects already produced at anthesis, and shoot androot dry weight changed little during period 3. The effects of environmental differences on grain dry weightcould not be explained by differences in leaf-area durationafter anthesis (D₃), except that CL in period 3 increased bothyield and D₃ but not proportionately, so that, as with HS inthe same period, grain: leaf ratio was decreased. Environmentaldifferences in periods 1 and 2 appeared to affect grain weightby altering the capacity of the ear to accumulate carbohydrates,determined by the number of grains per ear, rather than by alteringthe supply of carbohydrates, determined by D₃. There were some interactions between environments in differentperiods which were usually small compared with the main effects.     

Varietal Differences in Photosynthesis of Ears and Leaves of Barley

Rates of apparent photosynthesis of ears and of the combinedflag leaf and sheath and peduncle of Proctor barley grown inpots or in the field were similar to those of Plumage Archer,or slightly smaller when the dimensions of the ear and leafarea of Proctor were less than those of Plumage Archer. Thephotosynthesis rate of the ear—about 1.0 mg. CO₂ per earper hour—was similar or slightly less than the rate ofthe flag leaf and sheath and peduncle. These rates of photosynthesisindicated that 40-50 per cent, of the carbohydrate in the grainwas provided by photosynthesis in the shoot and about 40 percent, by photosynthesis in the ear. The total CO₂ fixed by theear was equivalent to about 60 per cent, of the grain weight,20 per cent, being lost by respiration. Shading the ear underestimatedthe total amount of CO₂ fixed by the ear and decreased dry weightof grain per ear of both Proctor and Plumage Archer by 26 percent., as in pots. The contribution of ear photosynthesis toyield of grain per acre was greater for Proctor than for PlumageArcher because Proctor had more ears. The rate of apparent photosynthesis per dm.² of leaves of Proctorwas similar to that of Plumage Archer both before and afterear emergence. Before ear emergence, the photosynthesis rateof a particular leaf decreased linearly with time and was slowerfor lower than for higher leaves on the shoot. Respiration ratesper g. dry weight of ears of Proctor and Plumage Archer weresimilar; in one experiment the leaves of Proctor respired slightlyfaster than those of Plumage Archer.     

褐飞虱对噻嗪酮抗性的遗传分析

害虫的抗性遗传特性是影响其抗性发展的一个重要因子,也是制订抗性治理对策的重要依据。我们采用稻茎浸渍法测定了褐飞虱Nilaparvatalugens (Stal)抗性和敏感亲本、正反交（F₁、F₁₂、F'₂）及回交（BC）后代3龄若虫对噻嗪酮的剂量反应数据,研究了褐飞虱对噻嗪酮的抗性遗传特性。结果表明: 正反交后代的显性度分别为-0.3153（F₁）和-0.376 3（F'₁）,表明抗性遗传为常染色体的不完全隐性;将自交及回交后代的剂量反应数据进行单个主基因假设的卡方(χ²)检验,其卡方值分别为42.11（F₂）、5.44 （F'₂）及93.57（BC）,均大于χ^２0.05= 15.51(df=8),表明其抗性是多基因控制的。还讨论了褐飞虱对噻嗪酮的抗性治理策略。     

Physiological Causes of Differences in Grain Yield between Varieties of Barley

In a field experiment on barley at Rothamsted with the highmean yield of 49 cwt. of grain per acre, the varieties Proctorand Herta produced 10—15 per cent, more grain than Plumage-Archeron plots that received no nitrogenous fertilizer. When nitrogenwas applied the difference was increased to about 30 per cent.,because the higher nitrogen supply caused the Plumage-Archercrop to lodge and did not increase its yield, while Proctorand Herta remained standing. The three varieties did not differ in leaf-area index nor innet assimilation rate before ear emergence, so that all hadthe same total dry weight. After ear emergence, the leaf-areaindices of Proctor and Plumage-Archer were nearly equal, butthat of Herta was smaller. Assuming that the photosyntheticefficiency of the leaves continued to be the same in all varieties,the higher grain yields of Proctor and Herta cannot be attributedto greater production of dry matter by the leaves, either beforeor after ear emergence. A pot experiment on plants with shadedears confirmed that the dry matter contributed to grain yieldby unit leaf area was nearly equal in all the varieties. The higher grain yield of Proctor and Herta than of Plumage-Archermust therefore have come from additional photosynthesis in partsof the plant other than the leaves, i.e. in the ears themselves.An attempt to demonstrate this directly in a pot experiment,by comparing the grain yields of plants with shaded or withunshaded ears, was unsuccessful because the varieties behaveddifferently in pots; Proctor and Herta produced only about 6per cent, more grain yield than Plumage-Archer, and though thedecrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greaterfor Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. The sum of ear sizes (estimated from length and breadth measurements)per m.1 in the field experiment was greater for Proctor andHerta than for Plumage-Archer. Also the distribution of drymatter between developing ears and shoots apparently differedwith variety, so that at ear emergence the dry weight of earsper m.² was greater in the two higher yielding varieties. Theincreased amount of photosynthetic tissue in the ears of Proctorand Herta, as measured by size or weight, may not wholly explaintheir greater dry-matter production; ears of Herta may alsohave a higher photosynthetic efficiency. No differences in nutrient uptake that could account for thevarietal differences in grain yield were found. Plumage-Archerabsorbed more potassium, and Herta less phosphorus than theother varieties. About a quarter of the final content of nitrogen,and a third of the phosphorus, was absorbed after ear emergence,but the potassium content was nearly maximal at ear emergenceand later decreased. The pot experiment showed that, on the average of all varieties,26 per cent. of the dry matter in the grain at harvest originatedfrom photosynthesis in the ears, including 10 per cent, fromthe awns; 59 per cent, came from photosynthesis in the flag-leaflamina and sheath and peduncle, and 15 per cent, from partsof the shoot below the flag leaf.     

Dynamics of Competition in Populations of Carrot (Daucus carota)

Populations of carrot (Daucus carota) were raised over a widerange of densities (79–5763 plants m^-2) to examine thedynamics of competition in terms of yield–density relationshipsand size variability, and to investigate the effects of nutrientsupply on competition. While the relationship between shootyield and density was asymptotic, the relationship between rootand total yield and density tended to be parabolic. For a giventime and density series the relationship between yield per unitarea and density could best be described by the model: y=w_mD_(1+aD)^b wherey is the yield per unit area,D is density,w_m, a andb arefitted parameters. The parametersw_m anda increased over timebut nutrient availability affected onlyw_m. An extension of thebasic yield-density model is proposed to describe the dynamicsof the yield–density relationship over time: y=kD_{[1+cexp(-rt)]{1+}     

Mixed Nitrogen Nutrition and Productivity of Wheat Grown in Hydroponics

The objective of this study was to study the effects of nitrogen(N) supplied as either mixtures of NO₃ and NH₄ or as all NO₃on the final yield of spring wheat. Two separate greenhouseexperiments evaluated the durum spring wheat (Triticum durumL.) cultivar ‘Inbar’ in 1986, and the hard red springwheat (Triticum aestmum L.) cultivar ‘Len’ in 1987.Nitrogen treatments consisted of all NO, or mixtures (75/25or 50/50) of NO₃ and NH₄. At maturity, plants were harvested,separated into leaves, stems, roots, and grain, and each partanalysed for dry matter and chemical composition Compared to plants receiving only NO₃ as the source of N, mixedN nutrition resulted in greater accumulation of whole plantreduced-N (49 to 108% more), phosphorus (38 to 69% more), andpotassium (25% more) for both cultivars. In all cases, plantsproduced higher grain yields (28% for Len to 78% for Inbar)when grown with mixed N nutrition than with only NO₃. The yieldincrease was not associated with heavier grains or more grainsper ear, but rather with an increase in the number of ear-bearingtillers per plant. For both cultivars, the higher yields withmixed N resulted from the production of more total biomass (36to 76%) as the partitioning of dry matter between plant partswas not altered by N treatment. Under the hydroponic conditionsof this experiment, the utilization of both NO₃ and NH₄ resultedin greater growth, nutrient absorption, and yield than NO₃ alone,which was primarily associated with an enhancement in tillerdevelopment Triticum aestivum L., Triticum durum L., spring wheat, hydroponics, ammonium nutrition, nitrate nutrition, tillering, yield components, partitioning     

不同小麦进化材料生育后期光合特性和产量

以二倍体野生一粒小麦(Triticum boeoticum)、栽培一粒小麦(T. monococcum)、节节麦(Aegilops tauschii)和黑麦(Secale cereale)、四倍体野生二粒小麦(T. dicoccoides)、栽培二粒小麦(T. dicoccum)、硬粒小麦(T. durum)、六倍体普通小麦(T. aestivum)‘扬麦9号’和‘扬麦158’及八倍体小黑麦(Triticale)为材料,采用盆栽试验研究了不同小麦进化材料生育后期旗叶光合特性的演变及产量的差异。结果表明,与六倍体普通小麦和八倍体小黑麦相比,二倍体和四倍体材料在开花前具有较高的光合速率(P_n)、气孔导度(G_s)、最大光能转换效率(F_v/F_m)和实际光化学效率(Φ_PSⅡ)。开花以后,二倍体和四倍体材料受非气孔因素的影响,光合能力下降较快;除黑麦外,旗叶光合速率在开花10 d后都低于普通小麦和小黑麦,胞间CO₂浓度(C_i)迅速增加,F_v/F_m、Φ_PSⅡ和叶绿素含量快速下降。二倍体和四倍体材料开花前单株总叶面积和旗叶叶面积较大,花后下降迅速,功能期短;单株穗数也较多,但穗粒数、千粒重、产量和收获指数却显著低于普通小麦。因此,小麦长期进化过程中,普通小麦花后较高的光合能力及较长的光合持续期是提高千粒重,进而提高产量的重要生理基础。     

Reproductive Allometry in Soybean, Maize and Sunflower

We compared the relationship between grain yield per plant (Y_P)and shoot biomass per plant (S_P) in three annual crops withcontrasting reproductive strategies: sunflower, a determinatespecies with a single inflorescence; maize, a determinate specieswith a limited capacity to adjust the number of ears in responseto resource availability; and indeterminate soybean, a specieswith a large capacity to adjust the number of inflorescences.Our working hypotheses were: H₁—the relationship betweenY_PandS_P is linear; H₂—the intercept of the model is zero,i.e. there is not a threshold plant mass for reproduction. Awide range of Y_Pand S_Pwas generated by manipulation of plantdensity;S_Pvaried between 0.3 and 196 g per plant in soybean,between 6 and 873 g per plant in sunflower and between 23 and697 g per plant in maize. Within these broad ranges of plantsize, both hypotheses were rejected in five out of six experiments,i.e. the relationship between Y_Pand S_Pdeparted from linearityand there was a threshold for S_Pbelow which no grain set occurred.TheS_P threshold for grain set varied widely among species; itwas close to 2 g per plant for soybean, 27 g per plant for sunflowerand 43–71 g per plant for maize. Because of this sizethreshold and non-linearity, harvest index (HI = Y_PS_P^-1) wasstable for mid-size plants, diminished slightly for large plants,and diminished sharply for smaller plants in all three crops.Harvest index stability was highest in soybean, intermediatein sunflower and lowest in maize. Differential stability ofreproductive partitioning partially derived from contrastingpatterns of meristem allocation. Copyright 2000 Annals of BotanyCompany Helianthus annuus L., Zea mays L., Glycine max(L.) Merrill, grain yield, harvest index, plant density, reproductive allocation, meristem allocation, plasticity     

EFFECTS OF CULTURAL TREATMENTS ON WHEAT AND ON THE INCIDENCE OF EYESPOT, LODGING, TAKE-ALL AND WEEDS. Field Experiments 1945–8

An experiment was made on the fourth, fifth and sixth successive crops of winter wheat to determine the effects of various treatments on the troubles which result from close cereal cropping. Eyespot and lodging were prevalent in the first year (1946); weeds in the second; eyespot, lodging, take-all and weeds in the third.
Spraying with H₂SO₄ reduced the incidence of eyespot, lodging and weeds, and increased yield of grain on plots which received sulphate of ammonia (by 2.7, 2.2 and 10.0 cwt./acre in successive years).
Sulphate of ammonia increased the incidence at harvest of eyespot and lodging, reduced take-all and consistently increased yield of straw. Eyespot and lodging reduced the effect of the fertilizer on yield of grain, take-all increased it.
Increase in seed rate increased the incidence of severe eyespot and of take-all; it increased lodging except when plants were dwarfed by take-all.
Weight of straw and percentage straws with severe eyespot lesions independently affected lodging, together accounting for 51% of the variance in percentage area lodged at harvest and 64 % of that lodged 33 days earlier.
Mean yields of grain on untreated plots sown with 3.3 1/2 bushels seed/acre fell from 26.0 to 22.5 to 11.7 cwt./acre in successive years, whereas yields of 28.4, 29.9 and 29.1 cwt./acre were obtained on sprayed plots sown with 1 1/2.2 bushels seed/acre which received 4 cwt./acre sulphate of ammonia, showing that high yields were maintained when eyespot, lodging, take-all and weeds were controlled.
By 1948 yields of grain on unsprayed plots had fallen to the level of those on similarly manured plots on the continuous wheat experiment on Broadbalk field. Spraying increased grain by amounts similar to those resulting from one year's fallow on Broadbalk; but fallow had its greatest effects on plots with low nitrogen, spraying on those with high nitrogen.     

Potential Dry Matter and Water Import Rates in the Tomato Fruit in Relationship to Fruit Size

The tomato fruit was compared to a sphere with a radius R. Radialgrowth rates in the fruit (F_IW and F_ID) due to water importor to dry matter import, respectively, which are also the waterimport rate or dry matter import rate per unit surface areaof fruit, were calculated from two sets of published results.This data referred to fruits which swelled in such a way thatthe availability of assimilates had little effect on growth.Two varieties differentiated the two series of results and inone series, three trials were differentiated by the salinityof the nutrient solution. In all trials, it was found that F_IW and F_ID decreased whenR increased. Two phases were observed for F_IW: after a firstphase, F_IW decreased more quickly and almost linearly when Rincreased. F_ID was constant or decreased with respect to R.Except at the beginning of growth at the greatest salinity,there were clearly linear regressions between F_IW and F_ID suchas F_ID = aF_IW-b; where b was lower with higher salinity. Thechanges of the concentration of imported dry matter (F_ID/F_IWwere examined in terms of R and F_IW/R. The mechanisms controllingthe changes in F_IW and F_ID were discussed. The results suggestedfruit radius was an important parameter of these mechanisms.Thus, water import rate and dry matter import rate could eachbe considered to be the product of two factors: fruit surfacearea, which is directly dependent on fruit radius, and waterimport rate or dry matter import rate per unit of fruit surfacearea.Copyright 1993, 1999 Academic Press Dry matter, fruit growth, logistic model, sink size, tomato, water transfer     

Dark Respiration of Several Varieties of Winter Wheat Given Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer

Carbon dioxide production in the dark by ears and by the restof the shoot of winter wheat grown in the field was measuredin 2 years during grain growth. The respiration rate per g d.wt of the ears was increased by nitrogen fertilizer. Ears ofthe semi-dwarf varieties Maris Fundin and Hobbit respired moreslowly than ears of Maris Huntsman and Cappelle-Desprez. Respirationrates of the rest of the shoot were unaffected by nitrogen orvariety. The amount of carbohydrate required to provide the CO₂ respiredduring the whole period of grain growth varied from 163 to 443g m^–2, or 42 to 76 per cent of the dry weight of the grain.More than half the CO₂ lost was respired by the ear. The additionof 180 kg N ha^–1, which increased grain yield by 78 percent in 1975, almost trebled the amount of CO₂ lost by the ears.The semi-dwarf varieties lost less CO₂ from ears and shootsthan did the taller ones, and had larger yields of grain. Respiration was also estimated from the difference between the¹⁴C contents of shoots sampled immediately after a 30 s exposureto ¹⁴CO₂ and at maturity. When 14C was supplied 10 days afteranthesis, the loss by maturity amounted to 16–28 per centof that initially absorbed by flag leaves and 40 per cent ofthat absorbed by the leaf below the flag leaf. Most of the lossoccurred in the first day. The loss of 14C by maturity was significantlyincreased by nitrogen fertilizer in 1975. Triticum aestivum L., wheat, respiration, nitrogen supply, fertilizer treatment     

Photosynthesis of Ears and Flag Leaves of Wheat and Barley

Immediately after anthesis ears of spring wheat absorbed lessthan 0.5 mg CO₂, per hour in daylight and later evolved CO₂,in the light and in the dark. The rate of apparent photosynthesisof the combined flag-leaf lamina and sheath and peduncle (collectivelycalled flag leaf) of two spring wheat varieties, Atle and JufyI, was 3–4 mg per hour; the rates of the flag leaf andthe ear of two spring barleys, Plumage Archer and Proctor, wereeach about 1 mg per hour. The gas exchange of ears and flag leaves between ear emergenceand maturity accounted for most of the final grain dry weight.The CO₂, fixed by the wheat ear was equivalent to between 17and 30 per cent of the grain weight, but more than this waslost by respiration, so assimilation in the flag leaf was equivalentto 110–20 per cent of the final grain weight. In barley,photosynthesis in the flag leaf and the net CO₂ uptake by theear each provided about half of the carbohydrate in the grain. Barley ears photosynthesized more than wheat ears because oftheir greater surface, and flag leaves of wheat photosynthesizedmore than those of barley because they had more surface anda slightly greater rate of photosynthesis per dm².     

Effect of Water Deficit on Accumulation of Dry Matter, Carbon and Nitrogen in the Kernel of Wheat Genotypes Differing in Yield Stability

Water stress effects on accumulation of dry matter, carbon andnitrogen in grains were analysed in varieties and species ofwheat differing in yield stability. Variable water environmentswere generated using a line source sprinkler system. Althoughlarge fluctuations occurred in the water potentials of the flagleaf and ear, grain growth remained relatively buffered undermoisture stress. Developing grains were at a lower moisturelevel throughout grain growth in plants subjected to moisturestress relative to the unstressed plants. Carbon content decreasedmore than the nitrogen content in the stressed grains of thespecies and varieties. Reduction in the duration of grain growthand the rate of dry weight accumulation induced by water stresswas more prominent in T. aestivum var. C306 and T. sphaerococcum.Grain yield was reduced significantly under water stress, themaximum being in the high yielding cultivar HD2329. Both grainnumber and grain weight were reduced in response to stress,the extent of reduction being different in different genotypes.Copyright1994, 1999 Academic Press Water deficit, yield stability, C and N accumulation, heat degree days     

Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on Photosynthesis in Cd-treated Sunflower Plants

Increased nitrogen supply stimulates plant growth and photosynthesis.Since it was shown that heavy metals may cause deficienciesof essential nutrients in plants the potential reversal of cadmiumtoxicity by increased N nutrition was investigated. The effectson photosynthesis of low Cd (0, 0.5, 2 or 5 mmol m^-3) combinedwith three N treatments (2, 7.5 or 10 mol m^-3) were examinedin young sunflower plants. Chlorophyll fluorescence quenchingparameters were determined at ambient CO₂and at 100 or 800 µmolquanta m^-2 s^-1. The vitality index (R_fd) decreased approx. three-timesin response to 5 mmol m^-3Cd, at 2 and 10 mol m^-3N. The maximumphotochemical efficiency of PSII reaction centres (F_v/ F_m) wasnot influenced by Cd or N treatment. The highest Cd concentrationdecreased quantum efficiency of PSII electron transport (_II)by 30%, at 2 and 10 mol m^-3N, mostly due to increased closureof PSII reaction centres (q_P). Photosynthetic oxygen evolutionrates at saturating CO₂were decreased in plants treated with5 mmol m^-3Cd, at all N concentrations. The results indicatethat Cd treatment affected the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP)regeneration capacity of the Calvin cycle more than other processes.At the same time, the amounts of soluble and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphatecarboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) protein increased with Cd treatment.Decreased photosynthesis, but substantially increased Rubiscocontent, in sunflower leaves under Cd stress indicate that asignificant amount of Rubisco protein is not active in photosynthesisand could have another function. It is shown that optimal nitrogennutrition decreases the inhibitory effects of Cd in young sunflowerplants. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company Helianthus annuus L., cadmium, nitrogen, photosynthesis, Rubisco, sunflower