Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA

S. Zhang, D. V. S. DeFrias, R. Alasadi and R. Nayar
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) has become widely accepted as an effective modality for obtaining tissue for primary diagnosis and staging. We have been using EUS‐FNA since July 2001 and herein we summarize our experience over a 5‐year period. Methods: A computer‐based search for in‐house EUS‐FNA was performed in the pathology database from July 2001 to October 2006. To calculate the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS‐FNA, the cytology diagnosis was compared with the surgical follow‐up. Results: A total of 951 EUS‐FNAs were performed during the study period and included 279 pancreatic solid lesions, 186 pancreatic cyst lesions, 249 lymph node aspirations, 111 gastrointestinal (GI) tract submucosal lesions, and 126 miscellaneous lesions. EUS‐FNA had a very high sensitivity and accuracy for solid pancreatic lesions (94.7 and 97.7%, respectively), low sensitivity and accuracy but high specificity (47, 64.8 and 95%, respectively) for cystic lesions. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic (CEA) levels were significantly higher in mucinous neoplasms than non‐neoplastic cysts. EUS‐FNA also had very high sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic carcinoma in lymph nodes (95 and 100%, respectively). GI submucosal spindle cell tumours were further classified with immunohistochemical stains performed either on a cell block or a core biopsy obtained via EUS guidance. Conclusions: EUS‐FNA has a very high sensitivity and accuracy for pancreatic solid lesions, but the sensitivity for cystic lesions is generally low. Cyst fluid chemical analysis for CEA is helpful, but the overlap between mucinous neoplasm and non‐neoplastic cysts is significant. Recognizing GI contamination is important and immunohistochemical stains are useful for GI submucosal spindle cell lesions.     

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment,diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract1

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has been proved to be safe, efficient and reliable in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. This study evaluated specimen adequacy, diagnostic criteria of various pancreatic neoplasms and contamination from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Methods: EUS‐guided FNA of the pancreas and subsequent surgical resections performed at the University of California Irvine Medical Center during February 1996–October 2000 were retrospectively selected. Modified Papanicolaou staining method was used for immediate evaluation and cell block prepared. Results: A total of 267 cases were available for review, including 147 (55.1%) positive/suspicious, 10 (3.7%) atypical, 96 (36.0%) negative and 14 (5.2%) unsatisfactory cases. Eighty‐six (58.5%) positive/suspicious cases had histological confirmation and 12 (8.3%) had lymph node or distant metastases by cytology. Three atypical, two negative, and two unsatisfactory cases proved to have adenocarcinoma. Contamination from duodenum, stomach or pancreas was found in 77 positive/suspicious, three atypical and 90 negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were 94.6%, 100%, 95.6%, 100%, 82% respectively. Conclusions: EUS FNA is efficient and accurate in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms in adequate samples. Contamination from the GI tract should be well recognized to avoid misinterpretation.     

Role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study of nine cases

Objective

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided‐fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is an established first‐line procedure in the management of solid and cystic pancreatic masses. Lymphoma is an uncommon diagnosis in EUS‐FNA of the pancreas, and it is more common for such a diagnosis to be because of secondary involvement of the pancreas by a lymphoproliferative disorder than for this to represent isolated primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL). We present the clinical, EUS and cytological features of these lesions.

Material and methods

After obtaining approval from our Institutional Review Board (IRB), nine cases of lymphoma diagnosed on EUS‐FNA at a tertiary care cancer centre over a period of 8 years from 2008 to 2016 were retrieved from our endoscopy and pathology archives. Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) was carried out by a trained cytopathologist in all these cases. Cell blocks were available in seven cases, and immunophenotyping was performed on cell blocks using the immunoperoxidase method. Flow cytometry was performed in two cases.

Results

The most frequent site of involvement was the head of the pancreas (n=5, 55.6%). Four out of nine cases were diagnosed as PPL (44.4%). Five cases were diagnosed as lymphoma secondarily involving the pancreas (55.6%). The most frequent diagnosis was diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (n=6, 66.7%), followed by Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=2, 22.2%) and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (n=1, 11.1%).

Conclusion

EUS‐FNA in experienced hands is a valuable diagnostic modality, in conjunction with ROSE, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, in the diagnosis and sub‐typing of both primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma.     

Lymphangioma of the pancreas: a multimodal approach to pre‐operative diagnosis

Background: Lymphangioma of the pancreas is an extremely rare benign tumour of lymphatic origin, with only four cases diagnosed by EUS‐FNA reported to date. Methods and materials: Five cases of either cytologically or histologically diagnosed pancreatic lymphangioma with pre‐operative cytological analysis by EUS‐FNAC were reviewed. Results: All patients were female, with a mean age of 56.4 years. By imaging, the cystic lesions ranged in size from 2 to 7 cm (mean 4.5 cm) and were mainly located in the head of the pancreas. All cysts had thin walls and no cyst demonstrated a mural nodule. Diagnosis based on imaging features was benign in all cases due to the absence of high‐risk features. Four samples were sent for biochemical analysis, which showed low CEA levels (range, <0.5–19.4 ng/ml; mean, 5.45 ng/ml) and CA 19.9 and CA 72.4 levels within normal range. All cyst fluids showed numerous small lymphocytes with no atypia; no epithelial cells were present, including no gastrointestinal contamination. Flow cytometry in two cases showed T lymphocytes with a mature phenotype. Surgical resection in two patients confirmed the cytological diagnosis. Benign clinical follow‐up was available in three patients at 2, 3 and 3.5 years. Conclusion: A multimodal approach to cytological diagnosis (combining clinical, radiological and cyst fluid gross, biochemical and cytological characteristics) can lead to the diagnosis of this cystic neoplasm and distinguish it from other more common cysts in the pancreas, potentially avoiding the need for unnecessary surgery.     

Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry

A. Stacchini, P. Carucci, D. Pacchioni, G. Accinelli, A. Demurtas, S. Aliberti, M. Bosco, M. Bruno, A. Balbo Mussetto, M. Rizzetto, G. Bussolati and C. De Angelis
Diagnosis of deep‐seated lymphomas by endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry Objective: Although endoscopic ultrasound combined with fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is rapidly becoming the preferred diagnostic approach for the sampling and diagnosis of gastrointestinal and mediastinal malignancies, there are limited data as to its use in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective evaluation of the performance of EUS‐guided FNA combined with flow cytometry (FC) as a tool to improve overall sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Methods: Of 1560 patients having EUS‐guided FNA during the period of the study, a total of 56 patients were evaluated by cytology with FC after EUS‐FNA. There was adequate material to perform FC analysis for all but one case. Results: EUS‐FNA‐FC gave a diagnosis of lymphoma in 11 cases and of reactive lymphadenopathy in 20. A specific histological type was defined by FC alone in eight cases. The remaining cases were diagnosed later by cytology and cell block sections: 13 carcinomas, nine granulomatous lymphadenopathies and one mediastinal extramedullary haematopoiesis. One case was considered only suspicious for lymphoma on cytology and FC but was not confirmed on molecular analysis and one had insufficient material for FC. Conclusions: Our results show that a combination of EUS‐FNA‐FC is a feasible and highly accurate method, which may be used for the diagnosis and subtyping of deep‐seated lymphoma, providing a significant improvement to cytomorphology alone both for diagnosis and treatment planning, as long as immunocytochemistry is available for non‐lymphoma cases.     

Optimizing specimen collection and laboratory procedures reduces the non‐diagnostic rate for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of solid lesions of the pancreas

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) is a routine technique to assess solid pancreatic lesions. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of optimizing laboratory procedures for specimen preparation on the rate and accuracy of the procedure. Methods: All EUS‐FNAs of solid pancreatic lesions performed during the year 2000 (Period 1) and from May 2003 to May 2004 (Period 2) were analysed. During Period 1, one experienced gastroenterologist performed all EUS‐FNAs, making direct smears and retrieving small fragments if present on the smear for histology. In Period 2, two endoscopists performed the EUS‐FNAs and all the material was emptied into a vial containing a fixative. Slide preparation was carried out in the pathology laboratory: one slide was processed using cytocentrifugation and cell blocks were made from left‐over material. Neither period utilized rapid on‐site evaluation. Results: During the two periods, 67 and 102 FNAs were analysed and showed significantly different (P < 0.001) non‐diagnostic rates of 22.8% and 4.2%, respectively. The increased diagnostic yield can be explained by the modified laboratory procedures and to a lesser extent by the increased experience of the gastroenterologists. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy in the second time period were, respectively, 90.6%, 100%, 100%, 81.8% and 93.4%, not significantly different from the first time period. Conclusion: This study shows that accurate EUS‐FNA results may be obtained with a low non‐diagnostic rate comparable to those reported for rapid on‐site evaluation by optimizing laboratory specimen processing in a setting of solid pancreatic lesions.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: cytomorphological and immunocytochemical evaluation

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is increasingly used in preoperative localization and diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms including neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The objective of the present study was to identify the cytological features of pancreatic NETs obtained by EUS-FNA. METHODS: The study group consisted of nine cases of pancreatic tumours correctly diagnosed or strongly suggestive of NETs based on EUS-FNA. Cytological smears were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical data and immunocytochemical stains applied to the cell block preparations were also reviewed and examined. RESULTS: All cases except one showed characteristic cytomorphological features sufficient for their recognition and separation from pancreatic adenocarcinoma and other lesions. The most helpful cytological features that facilitated the cytological diagnosis of NET were a richly cellular aspirate with a monotonous, poorly cohesive population of small cells with a speckled or dusty chromatin pattern and plasmacytoid morphology. The neuroendocrine differentiation of these tumours was further confirmed by immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA is a valuable method in the recognition of pancreatic NETs. By adherence to the characteristic cytomorphological criteria of pancreatic NET together with collection of suitable material for ancillary immunocytochemical stains, cytopathologists could reach a correct diagnosis in most instances.     

Pancreatobiliary cytology in the multidisciplinary setting

This review article discusses the role of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS FNA) cytology in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic tumours in the setting of a multidisciplinary team (MDT). The commonest diagnosis encountered is pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which is seldom diagnosed early enough for surgical resection. Thus, cytology is likely to be the only form of diagnosis in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, about half the lesions discussed at the MDT meeting are lesions other than primary adenocarcinoma and a wide differential diagnosis must be considered in order to identify tumours, including neuroendocrine tumours, that are amenable to surgical resection. Cytology is not always definitive and the diagnosis may be helped by categorizing results according to whether they are malignant, suspicious, atypical/indeterminate, benign or inadequate. Discussion at MDT meetings and correlation with clinical and imaging findings along with review of cytology slides may allow equivocal results to be clarified before treatment is decided. Inadequate cytology results are avoided by rapid on‐site evaluation of slides; although this is cost‐effective in terms of overall patient care, attendance of cytopathologists on‐site may not be feasible. At Imperial College NHS Trust, specially trained biomedical scientists successfully carry out rapid on‐site evaluation.     

Fine needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of liver tumors

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with liver fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis and the adjunctive use of cell blocks with reticulin stain. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed the results of cytopathologic diagnosis obtained by FNA biopsy over a 1-year period, from January 2000 to December 2000, in patients who presented primarily with ultrasonographically suspected liver nodules. FNA smears from 936 patients and cell blocks from 796 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 936 aspirates studied, the most common malignancy was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was diagnosed in 427 cases (45.6%), followed by metastatic adenocarcinoma, with 52 cases (5.6%). The concurrent cell block was available in 796 cases. Among them, 574 (72.1%) contained sufficient tissue for diagnosis. Combining analysis of cytologic and histologic specimens, the sensitivity of ultrasound-guided FNA for diagnosis of liver tumors was 85.1% and the specificity 98.7%. The results were better than isolated cytologic analysis, which gave a sensitivity of 78.4% and specificity of 97.4%. The lower diagnostic accuracy of cytology resulted mainly from its lower ability to distinguish well-differentiated HCC from benign lesions. In the cell block sections with reticulin stain, all HCCs showed a decreased or absent reticulin pattern, whereas all the benign hepatocellular lesions usually had a normal trabecular reticulin framework. CONCLUSION: FNA cytology assisted by cell block examination can be an accurate and minimally invasive method for the definitive pathologic diagnosis of primary benign and malignant liver masses and for confirmation of tumors metastatic to the liver. In addition, reticulin staining should be part of the routine assessment of cell blocks. It enhances diagnostic accuracy, particularly for well-differentiated HCC.     

Posters. P17 Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of thyroid swellings

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology is regarded as the gold standard investigation in diagnosis of thyroid swellings. Published data suggest an overall accuracy rate of 75% 1 in the detection of thyroid malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of FNA cytology in detection of thyroid malignancy in our surgical unit. Methods Between 1989–2002, 144 patients who underwent thyroid resection by single consultant surgeon and who had pre‐operative FNA were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pre‐operative FNA results were compared with definitive histological diagnosis following thyroid resection. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed using aspirate and non‐aspirate techniques on each thyroid swelling. The cytological sample was assessed by a single cytopathologist and was classified as inadequate, non‐neoplastic, neoplastic, suspicious or indeterminate. The histology was classified as non‐neoplastic (benign) and neoplastic (malignant). Results Fine needle aspiration cytology analysis revealed 94 (13.88%) non‐neoplastic, six (65.27%) neoplastic and 20 (4.16%) suspicious aspirates. Twenty (13.88%) samples were inadequate and four (2.77%) samples were indeterminate. Histological analysis showed 118 (81.94%) benign, 26 (18.05%) malignant specimens. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of 52.6%, 86.6% and 79.1%, respectively for diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Conclusion The results are comparable with the current published data and demonstrate that FNA cytology in our hands is accurate investigation for pre‐operative diagnosis for the detection of thyroid malignancy.     

Effect of ultrasound transmission gel on ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytological specimens of thyroid

A. Lalzad, D. Ristitsch, W. Downey, A. F. Little and M. E. Schneider‐Kolsky
Effect of ultrasound transmission gel on ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytological specimens of thyroid Objective: To investigate prospectively the diagnostic impact of ultrasound coupling gel on thyroid specimens obtained under ultrasound guidance. Methods: Patients presenting for ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration (USG‐FNA) of the thyroid were invited to participate in the study. Four specimens per nodule were collected: two using chlorhexdine wash and two using sterile, colourless ultrasound gel as couplant according to routine protocol. All slides were analysed in a blinded fashion by two senior cytologists for the presence or absence of ultrasound gel‐induced artefacts. The presence of gel‐induced artefacts between the two groups was analyzed using Pearson’s chi‐square test. Kappa statistics were used to measure the inter‐rater agreement between the cytologists. Results: Twenty thyroid nodules comprising 80 specimen slides were collected. On slides collected with gel, cytological artefacts were detected in 60–65% of cases compared with 10–15% of cases without gel (P < 0.001). The inter‐rater agreement between the two observers was very good (κ = 0.84). Two of the 14 patients required repeat FNA due to non‐diagnostic cytology results caused by inadequate sampling and gel‐induced artefacts. Conclusions: Clinical cytopathologists, radiologists and sonographers should be aware of the potential for ultrasound gel to cause significant artefacts on cytological specimens. Our findings suggest that staff involved in USG‐FNA cytology should remove the gel carefully before taking the aspirate.     

Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007

S. Piana, A. Frasoldati, M. Ferrari, R. Valcavi, E. Froio, V. Barbieri, C. Pedroni and G. Gardini Is a five‐category reporting scheme for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology accurate? Experience of over 18 000 FNAs reported at the same institution during 1998–2007 Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) has long been recognized as an essential technique for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Although specific cytological patterns have been recognized, a wide variety of reporting schemes for thyroid FNA results have been adopted. This study reports our experience with a five‐category reporting scheme developed in‐house based on a numeric score and applied to a large series of consecutive thyroid FNAs. It focuses mainly on the accuracy of thyroid FNA as a preoperative test in a large subset of histologically distinct thyroid lesions. Methods: During the 1998–2007 period, 18 359 thyroid ultrasound‐guided FNAs were performed on 15 269 patients; FNA reports were classified according to a C1–C5 reporting scheme: non‐diagnostic (C1), benign (C2), indeterminate (C3), suspicious (C4), and malignant (C5). Results: Non‐diagnostic (C1) and indeterminate (C3) FNA results totalled 2 230 (12.1%) and 1 461 (7.9%), respectively, while suspicious (C4) and malignant (C5) results totalled 238 (1.3%) and 531 (2.9%), respectively. Histological results were available in 2 047 patients, with thyroid malignancy detected in 840. Positive predictive value of FNA was 98.1% with a 49.0 likelihood ratio (LR) of malignancy in patients with a C4/C5 FNA report. Conclusions: This five‐category scheme for thyroid FNA is accurate in discriminating between the virtual certainty of malignancy associated with C5, a high rate (92%) of malignancy associated with C4, and a 98% probability of a histological benign diagnosis associated with C2. Further sub‐classifications of C3 may improve the accuracy of the diagnostic scheme and may help in recognizing patients eligible for a ‘wait and see’ management.     

Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme

Objective

To compare endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐FNAC diagnosis of pancreatic lesions with patient outcome based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme diagnostic categories: Panc 1 (non‐diagnostic); Panc 2 (negative for malignancy/neoplasia); Panc 3 (atypical); Panc 4B (neoplastic, benign); Panc 4O (neoplastic, other); Panc 5 (suspicious of malignancy); and Panc 6 (positive/malignant).

Methods

All EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens taken at Manchester Royal Infirmary in 2015 were prospectively classified according to the above scheme at the time of cytology reporting and data recorded prospectively. Subsequently, outcomes based on clinical follow‐up or histopathology diagnosis were compared with the cytology diagnosis.

Results

120 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from 111 patients were received, of which 112 (93.3%) specimens had follow‐up data. There were 79 and 41 EUS‐FNA pancreas specimens from solid and cystic lesions, respectively. Based on the cytology diagnosis the specimens were classified as Panc 1 (7.5%), Panc 2 (33.3%), Panc 3 (2.5%), Panc 4B (2.5%), Panc 4O (15.0%), Panc 5 (3.3%) and Panc 6 (35.9%). The performance indicators for diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasia with malignant potential, included sensitivity (95.4%), specificity (100%), positive predictive value (100%), negative predictive value (92.3%), false positive rate (0%) and false negative rate (4.6%).

Conclusions

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme is a logical system that can easily be introduced in a diagnostic cytopathology service. This classification scheme acts as an aid to diagnostic reporting, clear communication of significant results including risk of neoplasia/malignancy to clinicians, clinical audit and comparison of results with other centres.     

Galectin-3 is not useful in thyroid FNA

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have suggested that galectin-3 immunohistochemistry may be useful in the fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma as it has been reported to selectively stain carcinomas and not adenomas or goitres. METHODS: Fifty-one patients were included in a prospective study of galectin-3 in thyroid FNA; 88.2% were female and 11.8% male, mean age 53 years, range 25-87 years. Cell blocks were prepared and stained for galectin-3 if any cells were present in needle washings from the respective FNAs. RESULTS: Twelve of 51 (23.5%) of cell blocks contained epithelial cells. One benign and one inadequate FNA were negative for galectin-3 staining. One of five non-diagnostic FNA cases, a papillary carcinoma on final histology showed positive staining. Four follicular neoplasm/suspicious of carcinoma cases showed negative staining. One malignant FNA case, a papillary carcinoma showed positive staining with galectin-3 but three further carcinomas, two papillary and one follicular were galectin-3 negative. CONCLUSION: Galectin-3 immunohistochemistry does not appear to be a useful adjunct to diagnosis in thyroid FNA as it does not reliably distinguish malignant and benign lesions. Many thyroid aspirates are of low cellularity and are not suitable for cell block immunohistochemistry.     

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma

trovik c. s., bauer h. c. f., brosjö o., skoog l. and söderlund v. (1998) Cytopathology 9, 320–328
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma
We have used FNA cytology to diagnose suspected local recurrences of soft tissue sarcoma. Since 1991, a total of 95 FNA cytologies were performed on 86 patients. There were 47 local recurrences, of which 44 were diagnosed correctly by FNA cytology; one biopsy was inconclusive, and two lesions were incorrectly assessed as benign. Thirty-nine patients proved to have benign lesions in the scar area examined cytologically on 50 occasions. None of the specimens was regarded as malignant, but in four cases FNA cytology was inconclusive. Overall, there were 5% inconclusive cytological biopsies, 0% falsely malignant and 5% falsely benign. The inconclusive and false-negative cytological diagnoses had no important clinical consequences. FNA biopsy provides a simple means of diagnosing local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma.     

Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast—fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology findings

nogueira m., andré s. and mendonça e. . (1998) Cytopathology 9, 291–300
Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast—fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology findings
Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast are defined by mesenchymal and/or squamous cell components associated with ductal carcinoma and may raise diagnostic problems in FNA cytology. We reviewed FNA smears of a series of nine cases; seven were compared with histological sections and two with cell-block sections. The cytological pattern was diagnostic of carcinoma in six cases; in two cases a diagnosis of sarcoma/phyllodes tumour was considered, as cells were predominantly spindle-shaped. One case had a pleomorphic adenoma type pattern. The cytological findings suggesting a diagnosis of metaplastic carcinoma include a liquid aspirate, a proteinaceous or chondromyxoid background and a poorly differentiated tumour with multinucleated giant cells, neoplastic or histiocytic. A definite diagnosis requires the presence of both carcinomatous and metaplastic (squamous/mesenchymal) components.     

The role of FNA in the initial management of thyroid lesions: 7-year experience in a district general hospital

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology plays a major role in the diagnosis of the thyroid lesions in university hospitals and tertiary referral institutions. Our aim was to find out if this was possible in small district hospitals with limited resources. Over a 7-year period, from October 1994 to April 2002, 303 patients with thyroid swellings underwent FNA with an overall adequacy rate of 97.7%. FNAs were performed specifically by the pathologists, so that our inadequacy rate, 2.3% was far lower than 11-29% reported elsewhere. The FNA findings were compared with subsequent histology results in 67 cases. The diagnosis of benign and neoplastic lesions was predicted accurately by FNA in 93% and 94.7% of cases, respectively. The latter reached 100% if results of FNA in follicular neoplasms were excluded. Sensitivity and specificity were 85.6% and 97.6%, respectively, which is comparable with results from tertiary institutions. The commonest thyroid lesions in our hospital were nodular goitre (52.4%), followed by thyroiditis (17.6%) and neoplasia (13.9%). We conclude that, with the availability of appropriate personnel, FNA is feasible as the major modality in district general hospitals. FNA in follicular lesions remains challenging but could be overcome in part by recognizing the criteria to differentiate follicular variant of papillary carcinoma and other follicular proliferations. Aspiration, smearing, staining and interpretation should be left to pathologists or other well-trained personnel to ensure good quality and consistency.     

Mastopathic fibroadenoma of the breast: a pitfall of aspiration cytology

OBJECTIVE: To assess the correlation between cytological diagnoses and histological subtypes of fibroadenoma (FA) and to clarify the cytological features of a specific group of FA displaying variable features similar to fibrocystic disease (mastopathic type, MFA), and to evaluate the significance of this subtype in cytological diagnosis. METHODS: A review of 141 cases of histologically proven FA was performed. We re-classified them into four subtypes according to Kinoshita's criteria [Jpn J Breast Cancer6 (1991) 377] and further selected 92 cases for which both fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears and histological specimens were available. Among them, 18 cases of MFA and their cytological smears were selected for the present study. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between MFA and cytological diagnosis of 'indeterminate' or 'suspicious for malignancy' (P < 0.01). Although no false-positive diagnosis was experienced in our series, 56% of the MFAs (10/18) had cytological diagnoses of indeterminate or were included in the category 'suspicious for malignancy'. Smears from MFA revealed high cellularity (9/18 smears had more than 10 epithelial clusters each composed of more than 50 cells), presence of cellular discohesiveness (13/18, 72.2%), but only mild nuclear atypia (5/18, 27.8%). Anisonucleosis was present in fewer than half the cases and no apparent condensed chromatin was identified. CONCLUSION: We highlight the significance of subclassification of MFA in aspiration cytology of breast. MFA had a significantly higher chance of falling into the 'suspicious for malignancy' or 'indeterminate' diagnostic category in aspiration cytology. It might be a diagnostic challenge for cytopathologist to identify this subtype of FA in FNA smears.     

Diagnosis of fibromatosis colli by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology

This study presents eight cases of fibromatosis colli accurately diagnosed by FNA cytology. Fibromatosis colli is a rare fibroblastic lesion that manifests in the sternocleidomastoid muscle during the first to second months after birth. The tumours varied in size from 1 to 3 cm and engaged the lower, middle as well as the upper part of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The FNA cytology smears showed mostly mature fibroblasts in a background of pink granular material and fragments of striated muscle fibres with degeneration. The cytological presentation together with the typical clinical setting will allow a definitive and accurate diagnosis, avoiding surgery.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of bone lesions

OBJECTIVE: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in combination with radiological examination has recently gained clinical recognition for evaluating skeletal lesions. We evaluated our experience with the use of FNA in diagnosing bone lesions with emphasis on areas of difficulty and limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a period of 5 years FNA was performed in 66 cases of bone lesions. Aspirations were done by cytopathologists using 22-gauge needle. Out of 66 cases unsatisfactory aspirate was obtained in 12 cases. Cytohistological correlation was available in 19 cases. RESULTS: Adequate aspirates were categorized into neoplastic (27 cases) and non-neoplastic (27 cases) lesions. Of the 27 neoplastic aspirates, 20 were malignant (12 primary, 8 metastatic deposits) and 7 were benign. In the malignant group osteosarcoma was correctly diagnosed in 3 cases while other 3 were labeled as sarcoma NOS because of lack of osteoid. Metastatic deposits were sub-typed in 6 cases; from renal cell carcinoma (3 cases), proststic adenocarcinoma, follicular carcinoma thyroid, and squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplastic group comprised of 6 cases of cysts and 21 cases of chronic osteomyelitis. Thirteen cases were diagnosed as tuberculous osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: FNA is a frequent indication in metastases in the bone where distinct cytologic features can even identify an unknown primary. However, diagnosis of primary tumours of the bone is limited by precise subtyping of the tumours. FNA has emerged as a cost effective tool for initial diagnosis of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions of the bone.