Pexophagy is responsible for 65% of cases of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) is a group of diseases caused by mutations in one of the peroxins, proteins responsible for biogenesis of the peroxisomes. In recent years, it became clear that many peroxins (e.g., PEX3 and PEX14) play additional roles in peroxisome homeostasis (such as promoting autophagic degradation of peroxisomes or pexophagy), which are often opposite to their originally established functions in peroxisome formation and maintenance. Even more interesting, the peroxins that make up the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) in yeast (Pex1, Pex6 and Pex15) or mammals (PEX1, PEX6, PEX26) are responsible for the downregulation of pexophagy. Moreover, this might be even their primary role in human: to prevent pexophagy by removing from the peroxisomal membrane the ubiquitinated peroxisomal matrix protein import receptor, Ub-PEX5, which is also a signal for the Ub-binding pexophagy receptor, NBR1. Remarkably, the peroxisomes rescued from pexophagy by autophagic inhibitors in PEX1^G843D (the most common PBD mutation) cells are able to import matrix proteins and improve their biochemical function suggesting that the AAA-complex per se is not essential for the protein import function in human. This paradigm-shifting discovery published in the current issue of Autophagy has raised hope for up to 65% of all PBD patients with various deficiencies in the AAA-complex. Recognizing PEX1, PEX6 and PEX26 as pexophagy suppressors will allow treating these patients with a new range of tools designed to target mammalian pexophagy.     

The peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex prevents pexophagy and development of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) are metabolic disorders caused by the loss of peroxisomes. The majority of PBDs result from mutation in one of 3 genes that encode for the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) required for cycling PEX5 for peroxisomal matrix protein import. Mutations in these genes are thought to result in a defect in peroxisome assembly by preventing the import of matrix proteins. However, we show here that loss of the AAA-complex does not prevent matrix protein import, but instead causes an upregulation of peroxisome degradation by macroautophagy, or pexophagy. The loss of AAA-complex function in cells results in the accumulation of ubiquitinated PEX5 on the peroxisomal membrane that signals pexophagy. Inhibiting autophagy by genetic or pharmacological approaches rescues peroxisome number, protein import and function. Our findings suggest that the peroxisomal AAA-complex is required for peroxisome quality control, whereas its absence results in the selective degradation of the peroxisome. Thus the loss of peroxisomes in PBD patients with mutations in their peroxisomal AAA-complex is a result of increased pexophagy. Our study also provides a framework for the development of novel therapeutic treatments for PBDs.     

A new role for ATM in selective autophagy of peroxisomes (pexophagy)

Peroxisomes are autonomously replicating and highly metabolic organelles necessary for β-oxidation of fatty acids, a process that generates large amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Maintaining a balance between biogenesis and degradation of peroxisomes is essential to maintain cellular redox balance, but how cells do this has remained somewhat of a mystery. While it is known that peroxisomes can be degraded via selective autophagy (pexophagy), little is known about how mammalian cells regulate pexophagy to maintain peroxisome homeostasis. We have uncovered a mechanism for regulating pexophagy in mammalian cells that defines a new role for ATM (ATM serine/threonine kinase) kinase as a “first responder” to peroxisomal ROS. ATM is delivered to the peroxisome by the PEX5 import receptor, which recognizes an SRL sequence located at the C terminus of ATM to localize this kinase to peroxisomes. In response to ROS, the ATM kinase is activated and performs 2 functions: i) it signals to AMPK, which activates TSC2 to suppresses MTORC1 and phosphorylates ULK1 to induce autophagy, and ii) targets specific peroxisomes for pexophagy by phosphorylating PEX5 at Ser141, which triggers ubiquitnation of PEX5 at Lys209 and binding of the autophagy receptor protein SQSTM1/p62 to induce pexophagy.     

Role of PEX5 ubiquitination in maintaining peroxisome dynamics and homeostasis

Peroxisomes are essential and dynamic organelles that allow cells to rapidly adapt and cope with changing environments and/or physiological conditions by modulation of both peroxisome biogenesis and turnover. Peroxisome biogenesis involves the assembly of peroxisome membranes and the import of peroxisomal matrix proteins. The latter depends on the receptor, PEX5, which recognizes peroxisomal matrix proteins in the cytosol directly or indirectly, and transports them to the peroxisomal lumen. In this review, we discuss the role of PEX5 ubiquitination in both peroxisome biogenesis and turnover, specifically in PEX5 receptor recycling, stability and abundance, as well as its role in pexophagy (autophagic degradation of peroxisomes).     

PEX5 and Ubiquitin Dynamics on Mammalian Peroxisome Membranes

Peroxisomes are membrane-bound organelles within eukaryotic cells that post-translationally import folded proteins into their matrix. Matrix protein import requires a shuttle receptor protein, usually PEX5, that cycles through docking with the peroxisomal membrane, ubiquitination, and export back into the cytosol followed by deubiquitination. Matrix proteins associate with PEX5 in the cytosol and are translocated into the peroxisome lumen during the PEX5 cycle. This cargo translocation step is not well understood, and its energetics remain controversial. We use stochastic computational models to explore different ways the AAA ATPase driven removal of PEX5 may couple with cargo translocation in peroxisomal importers of mammalian cells. The first model considered is uncoupled, in which translocation is spontaneous, and does not immediately depend on PEX5 removal. The second is directly coupled, in which cargo translocation only occurs when its PEX5 is removed from the peroxisomal membrane. The third, novel, model is cooperatively coupled and requires two PEX5 on a given importomer for cargo translocation — one PEX5 with associated cargo and one with ubiquitin. We measure both the PEX5 and the ubiquitin levels on the peroxisomes as we vary the matrix protein cargo addition rate into the cytosol. We find that both uncoupled and directly coupled translocation behave identically with respect to PEX5 and ubiquitin, and the peroxisomal ubiquitin signal increases as the matrix protein traffic increases. In contrast, cooperatively coupled translocation behaves dramatically differently, with a ubiquitin signal that decreases with increasing matrix protein traffic. Recent work has shown that ubiquitin on mammalian peroxisome membranes can lead to selective degradation by autophagy, or ‘pexophagy.’ Therefore, the high ubiquitin level for low matrix cargo traffic with cooperatively coupled protein translocation could be used as a disuse signal to mediate pexophagy. This mechanism may be one way that cells could regulate peroxisome numbers.     

Deficiency of the exportomer components Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 causes enhanced pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Turnover of damaged, dysfunctional, or excess organelles is critical to cellular homeostasis. We screened mutants disturbed in peroxisomal protein import, and found that a deficiency in the exportomer subunits Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 results in enhanced turnover of peroxisomal membrane structures compared with other mutants. Strikingly, almost all peroxisomal membranes were associated with phagophore assembly sites in pex1Δ atg1Δ cells. Degradation depended on Atg11 and the pexophagy receptor Atg36, which mediates degradation of superfluous peroxisomes. Mutants of PEX1, PEX6, and PEX15 accumulate ubiquitinated receptors at the peroxisomal membrane. This accumulation has been suggested to trigger pexophagy in mammalian cells. We show by genetic analysis that preventing this accumulation does not abolish pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find Atg36 is modified in pex1Δ cells even when Atg11 binding is prevented, suggesting Atg36 modification is an early event in the degradation of dysfunctional peroxisomal structures in pex1Δ cells via pexophagy.     

Atg36

Eukaryotic cells adapt their organelle composition and abundance according to environmental conditions. Analysis of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 has revealed that this protein plays a crucial role in peroxisome maintenance as it is required for peroxisome formation, segregation and breakdown. Although its function in peroxisome formation and segregation was known to involve its recruitment to the peroxisomal membrane of factors specific for these processes, the role of Pex3 in peroxisome breakdown was unclear until our recent identification of Atg36 as a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3-interacting protein. Atg36 is recruited to peroxisomes by Pex3 and is required specifically for pexophagy. Atg36 is distinct from Atg30, the pexophagy receptor identified in Pichia pastoris. Atg36 interacts with Atg11 in vivo, and to a lesser extent with Atg8. These latter proteins link autophagic cargo receptors to the core autophagy machinery. Like other autophagic cargo receptors, Atg36 is a suicide receptor and is broken down in the vacuole together with its cargo. Unlike other cargo receptors, the interaction between Atg36 and Atg8 does not seem to be direct. Our recent findings suggest that Atg36 is a novel pexophagy receptor that may target peroxisomes for degradation via a noncanonical mechanism.     

Atg36: The Saccharomyces cerevisiae receptor for pexophagy

Eukaryotic cells adapt their organelle composition and abundance according to environmental conditions. Analysis of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 has revealed that this protein plays a crucial role in peroxisome maintenance as it is required for peroxisome formation, segregation and breakdown. Although its function in peroxisome formation and segregation was known to involve its recruitment to the peroxisomal membrane of factors specific for these processes, the role of Pex3 in peroxisome breakdown was unclear until our recent identification of Atg36 as a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3-interacting protein. Atg36 is recruited to peroxisomes by Pex3 and is required specifically for pexophagy. Atg36 is distinct from Atg30, the pexophagy receptor identified in Pichia pastoris. Atg36 interacts with Atg11 in vivo, and to a lesser extent with Atg8. These latter proteins link autophagic cargo receptors to the core autophagy machinery. Like other autophagic cargo receptors, Atg36 is a suicide receptor and is broken down in the vacuole together with its cargo. Unlike other cargo receptors, the interaction between Atg36 and Atg8 does not seem to be direct. Our recent findings suggest that Atg36 is a novel pexophagy receptor that may target peroxisomes for degradation via a noncanonical mechanism.     

Deficiency of the exportomer components Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 causes enhanced pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Turnover of damaged, dysfunctional, or excess organelles is critical to cellular homeostasis. We screened mutants disturbed in peroxisomal protein import, and found that a deficiency in the exportomer subunits Pex1, Pex6, and Pex15 results in enhanced turnover of peroxisomal membrane structures compared with other mutants. Strikingly, almost all peroxisomal membranes were associated with phagophore assembly sites in pex1Δ atg1Δ cells. Degradation depended on Atg11 and the pexophagy receptor Atg36, which mediates degradation of superfluous peroxisomes. Mutants of PEX1, PEX6, and PEX15 accumulate ubiquitinated receptors at the peroxisomal membrane. This accumulation has been suggested to trigger pexophagy in mammalian cells. We show by genetic analysis that preventing this accumulation does not abolish pexophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find Atg36 is modified in pex1Δ cells even when Atg11 binding is prevented, suggesting Atg36 modification is an early event in the degradation of dysfunctional peroxisomal structures in pex1Δ cells via pexophagy.     

Pex3-anchored Atg36 tags peroxisomes for degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Peroxisomes undergo rapid, selective autophagic degradation (pexophagy) when the metabolic pathways they contain are no longer required for cellular metabolism. Pex3 is central to the formation of peroxisomes and their segregation because it recruits factors specific for these functions. Here, we describe a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein that interacts with Pex3 at the peroxisomal membrane. We name this protein Atg36 as its absence blocks pexophagy, and its overexpression induces pexophagy. We have isolated pex3 alleles blocked specifically in pexophagy that cannot recruit Atg36 to peroxisomes. Atg36 is recruited to mitochondria if Pex3 is redirected there, where it restores mitophagy in cells lacking the mitophagy receptor Atg32. Furthermore, Atg36 binds Atg8 and the adaptor Atg11 that links receptors for selective types of autophagy to the core autophagy machinery. Atg36 delivers peroxisomes to the preautophagosomal structure before being internalised into the vacuole with peroxisomes. We conclude that Pex3 recruits the pexophagy receptor Atg36. This reinforces the pivotal role played by Pex3 in coordinating the size of the peroxisome pool, and establishes its role in pexophagy in S. cerevisiae.     

Export-deficient monoubiquitinated PEX5 triggers peroxisome removal in SV40 large T antigen-transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous cell organelles essential for human health. To maintain a healthy cellular environment, dysfunctional and superfluous peroxisomes need to be selectively removed. Although emerging evidence suggests that peroxisomes are mainly degraded by pexophagy, little is known about the triggers and molecular mechanisms underlying this process in mammalian cells. In this study, we show that PEX5 proteins fused to a bulky C-terminal tag trigger peroxisome degradation in SV40 large T antigen-transformed mouse embryonic fibroblasts. In addition, we provide evidence that this process is autophagy-dependent and requires monoubiquitination of the N-terminal cysteine residue that marks PEX5 for recycling. As our findings also demonstrate that the addition of a bulky tag to the C terminus of PEX5 does not interfere with PEX5 monoubiquitination but strongly inhibits its export from the peroxisomal membrane, we hypothesize that such a tag mimics a cargo protein that cannot be released from PEX5, thus keeping monoubiquitinated PEX5 at the membrane for a sufficiently long time to be recognized by the autophagic machinery. This in turn suggests that monoubiquitination of the N-terminal cysteine of peroxisome-associated PEX5 not only functions to recycle the peroxin back to the cytosol, but also serves as a quality control mechanism to eliminate peroxisomes with a defective protein import machinery.     

Insights into the Role of the Peroxisomal Ubiquitination Machinery in Pex13p Degradation in the Yeast Hansenula polymorpha

The import of matrix proteins into peroxisomes in yeast requires the action of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Pex4p and a complex consisting of the ubiquitin E3 ligases Pex2p, Pex10p and Pex12p. Together, this peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery is thought to ubiquitinate the cycling receptor protein Pex5p and members of the Pex20p family of co-receptors, a modification that is required for receptor recycling. However, recent reports have demonstrated that this machinery plays a role in additional peroxisome-associated processes. Hence, our understanding of the function of these proteins in peroxisome biology is still incomplete. Here, we identify a role for the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in the degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p. Our data demonstrate that Pex13p levels build up in cells lacking members of this machinery and also establish that Pex13p undergoes rapid degradation in wild-type cells. Furthermore, we show that Pex13p is ubiquitinated in wild-type cells and also establish that Pex13p ubiquitination is reduced in cells lacking a functional peroxisomal E3 ligase complex. Finally, deletion of PEX2 causes Pex13p to build up at the peroxisomal membrane. Taken together, our data provide further evidence that the role of the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in peroxisome biology goes much deeper than receptor recycling alone.     

The ides of MARCH5: The E3 ligase essential for peroxisome degradation by pexophagy

A recent study by Zheng et al. (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202103156) identifies the ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) MARCH5 as a dual-organelle localized protein that not only targets to mitochondria but also to peroxisomes in a PEX19-mediated manner. Moreover, the authors demonstrate that the Torin1-dependent induction of pexophagy is executed by the MARCH5-catalyzed ubiquitination of the peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70.

Recent research has begun to slowly elucidate the complex processes that underlie selective autophagic degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. The study by Zheng et al. (1) sheds a light on the mechanism underlying pexophagy, which is induced by mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inactivation (2). The ubiquitously conserved serine/threonine kinase mTOR has a central function in integrating diverse growth signals and orchestrating their physiological effect on a cellular level, while blocking cell growth–restricting mechanisms like the different autophagy pathways (3). Previous work has demonstrated that amino acid starvation could induce mTOR inhibition-dependent peroxisome degradation by up-regulating the activity of the peroxisomal protein ubiquitin (E3) ligase PEX2 (4), which was especially of interest as PEX2 is also required for peroxisomal matrix protein import during the formation of the organelle (5). However, while these data suggested that the dual function of PEX2 might mark it as a point of convergence for the balance of peroxisome formation and degradation, the Zheng et al. study has identified a role for the E3 ligase MARCH5 (membrane-associated RING-CH 5; 1) that aims at a different aspect of peroxisome biology.Zheng et al. identified the peroxisomal proteins PEX3, PEX19, and PMP70 as close interaction partners of MARCH5 (1). The authors could demonstrate a PEX19-dependent localization of a portion of the MARCH5 population to peroxisomes. Here, MARCH5 can bind and polyubiquitinate the abundant peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70. While it is clear that the increased level of polyubiquitinated PMP70 molecules marks peroxisomes for recognition by ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors that link the target organelle to the autophagosomal membrane, the identity of the E2 enzyme involved in ubiquitin chain generation as well as the ubiquitin adaptors are unknown (Fig. 1). However, based on published research, NBR1 or p62 are good candidates for the adaptors that engage the autophagy machinery (2). Moreover, the Zheng et al. study demonstrates that MARCH5-mediated polyubiquitination of PMP70 is induced by the mTOR inhibitor Torin1. In return, the described Torin1-induced pexophagy was shown to rely on the peroxisomal localization and activity of the catalytic RING domain of MARCH5 (1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The small molecule Torin1 can inhibit the kinase mTOR, resulting in a relief of the mTOR-dependent block of MARCH5 targeting to peroxisomes. MARCH5 is inserted into the peroxisomal membrane in a PEX19- and PEX3-dependent manner. MARCH5 ubiquitinates the abundant peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70 with the help of an unknown ubiquitin (Ub)-conjugating enzyme (E2). The ubiquitinated PMP70 molecules are recognized by ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors, like NBR1 or p62, that link the organelle to the autophagosome, resulting in the autophagic degradation of the peroxisome via pexophagy.It is interesting to note that the opponent of pexophagy-linked ubiquitin signals on peroxisomes was already identified as the deubiquitinating enzyme USP30 (6). This combination is even more relevant when considering that MARCH5 and USP30 were described as an antagonizing enzyme pair that regulates the autophagic degradation of mitochondria via mitophagy (6). The function of MARCH5 is also linked to other mitochondrial ubiquitination factors, like the E3 ligase Parkin. While both enzymes can contribute to mitophagy induction by ubiquitinating proteins of the outer mitochondrial membrane, they can also modify each other. MARCH5 ubiquitinates Parkin in order to restrict the number of Parkin molecules during mitophagy and to prevent Parkin-mediated cell death (7).After mitophagy induction, Parkin can ubiquitinate MARCH5, which results in the p97-mediated membrane extraction of MARCH5 and a PEX3/PEX16-dependent redistribution of MARCH5 to peroxisomes (8). This mechanism was assumed to rescue MARCH5 from degradation by mitophagy. It will be important to elucidate if there is mechanistic overlap between the Parkin-mediated (8) and the Torin1-dependent (1) targeting of MARCH5. Moreover, it will be interesting to determine if MARCH5 is also engaged in an interplay with the peroxisomal E3 ligases PEX2, PEX10, PEX12, or TRIM37.Mitochondria and peroxisomes share basic components of their fission machineries. Both organelles use the membrane proteins FIS1 and mitochondrial fission factor for the targeting of the membrane-constricting GTPase DRP1 (DLP1; 9). In the case of the mitochondria, MARCH5 can ubiquitinate DRP1 and FIS1 for proteasomal degradation in order to limit mitochondrial However, other data indicate the existence of a feedback mechanism, as DRP1 can also negatively influence MARCH5 activity. In addition, MARCH5 not only limits mitochondrial fission, but also represents a basic requirement for this process. This complex relationship of MARCH5 with mitochondrial fission proteins suggests that it performs a central role in the fine-tuning of the basic regulatory aspects of mitochondrial division (10). Therefore, future studies might not only establish a potential role of MARCH5 in peroxisomal fission but might also uncover aspects that could enable further insights into the related process in mitochondria.The different roles of MARCH5 in organelle fission and autophagic degradation could possibly be interconnected in one bipartite reaction sequence. Mitochondrial fission is crucial for mitophagy and enables the removal of damaged sections of mitochondria or the limitation of organelle size for a more efficient engulfment by autophagosomal membranes (11). Therefore, both processes can be functionally interconnected. Interestingly, it has been shown that fission also precedes pexophagy in yeast cells (12), which are thought to use organelle-specific adaptors instead of ubiquitin as a degradation tag. However, these observations suggest that MARCH5 might coordinate peroxisomal fission with pexophagy even in mammalian peroxisomes.In summary, the Zheng et al. study not only identifies a central mechanistic module required for the turnover of mammalian peroxisomes (1) but also raises many interesting questions that will result in further studies dealing with the interplay of the peroxisomal ubiquitination factors, the crosstalk between mitochondria and peroxisomes, and the organization and regulation of the peroxisomal fission machinery as well as the convergence of peroxisomal fission and pexophagy pathways.     

NBR1 co-operates with p62 in selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets

Selective degradation of intracellular targets, such as misfolded proteins and damaged organelles, is an important homeostatic function that autophagy has acquired in addition to its more general role in restoring the nutrient balance during stress and starvation. Although the exact mechanism underlying selection of autophagic substrates is not known, ubiquitination is a candidate signal for autophagic degradation of misfolded and aggregated proteins. p62/SQSTM1 was the first protein shown to bind both target-associated ubiquitin (Ub) and LC3 conjugated to the phagophore membrane, thereby effectively acting as an autophagic receptor for ubiquitinated targets. Importantly, p62 not only mediates selective degradation but also promotes aggregation of ubiquitinated proteins that can be harmful in some cell types. Is p62 the only autophagic receptor for selective autophagy? Looking for proteins that interact with ATG8 family proteins, we identified NBR1 (neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1) as an additional LC3- and Ub-binding protein. NBR1 is degraded by autophagy depending on its LC3-interacting region (LIR) but does not strictly require p62 for this process. Like p62, NBR1 accumulates and aggregates when autophagy is inhibited and is a part of pathological inclusions. We propose that NBR1 together with p62 promotes autophagic degradation of ubiquitinated targets and simultaneously regulates their aggregation when autophagy becomes limited.     

稻瘟病菌过氧化物酶体产生与降解的关键基因

过氧化物酶体(peroxisomes)是真核细胞中一类单层膜包被的细胞器,参与多种生化代谢.过氧化物酶体起源于内质网,过氧化物酶体形成相关的蛋白称为Peroxin,其编码基因通常写作PEX.细胞中过氧化物酶体的选择性消解称为过氧化物酶体自噬(pexophagy).参与细胞自噬(autophagy)的基因(ATG)大多参与过氧化物酶体自噬.近年来,丝状真菌中过氧化物酶体形成与降解机制的研究进展迅速,相关基因不断被鉴定.本文对相关研究进行了简要评述,并以稻瘟病菌为例,对丝状真菌基因组中可能的PEX和ATG基因进行了检索.发现稻瘟病菌中存在除PEX15,PEX17,PEX18,PEX21,PEX22,ATG19,ATG25,ATG30和ATG31之外的大多数PEX和ATG基因;同时,还存在多个丝状真菌特有的基因.说明过氧化物酶体的产生与消解在酵母、丝状真菌与哺乳动物之间相对保守,同时又各具特性.     

Excess peroxisomes are degraded by autophagic machinery in mammals

Peroxisomes are degraded by autophagic machinery termed "pexophagy" in yeast; however, whether this is essential for peroxisome degradation in mammals remains unknown. Here we have shown that Atg7, an essential gene for autophagy, plays a pivotal role in the degradation of excess peroxisomes in mammals. Following induction of peroxisomes by a 2-week treatment with phthalate esters in control and Atg7-deficient livers, peroxisomal degradation was monitored within 1 week after discontinuation of phthalate esters. Although most of the excess peroxisomes in the control liver were selectively degraded within 1 week, this rapid removal was exclusively impaired in the mutant liver. Furthermore, morphological analysis revealed that surplus peroxisomes, but not mutant hepatocytes, were surrounded by autophagosomes in the control. Our results indicated that the autophagic machinery is essential for the selective clearance of excess peroxisomes in mammals. This is the first direct evidence for the contribution of autophagic machinery in peroxisomal degradation in mammals.     

Peroxisomal Pex3 Activates Selective Autophagy of Peroxisomes via Interaction with the Pexophagy Receptor Atg30

Pexophagy is a process that selectively degrades peroxisomes by autophagy. The Pichia pastoris pexophagy receptor Atg30 is recruited to peroxisomes under peroxisome proliferation conditions. During pexophagy, Atg30 undergoes phosphorylation, a prerequisite for its interactions with the autophagy scaffold protein Atg11 and the ubiquitin-like protein Atg8. Atg30 is subsequently shuttled to the vacuole along with the targeted peroxisome for degradation. Here, we defined the binding site for Atg30 on the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex3 and uncovered a role for Pex3 in the activation of Atg30 via phosphorylation and in the recruitment of Atg11 to the receptor protein complex. Pex3 is classically a docking protein for other proteins that affect peroxisome biogenesis, division, and segregation. We conclude that Pex3 has a role beyond simple docking of Atg30 and that its interaction with Atg30 regulates pexophagy in the yeast P. pastoris.     

Peroxisome degradation in mammals

This review summarizes the historical aspects of the study of peroxisome degradation in mammalian cells. Peroxisomes have diverse metabolic roles in response to environmental changes and are degraded in a preferential manner, by comparison with cytosolic proteins. This review introduces three hypotheses on the degradation mechanisms: (a) the action of the peroxisome-specific Lon protease; (b) the membrane disruption effect of 15-lipoxygenase; and (c) autophagy that sequesters and degrades the organelles by lysosomal enzymes. Among these hypotheses, autophagy is now recognized as the most important mechanism for excess peroxisome degradation. One of the most striking characteristics of peroxisomes is that they are markedly proliferated in the liver by the administration of hypolipidemic drugs and industrial plasticizers. The effects of these substances were fully reversed after withdrawal of the substances, and most of the excess peroxisomes were selectively degraded and recovered to a normal number and size. Autophagic degradation of peroxisomes has been examined using this characteristic phenomenon. Excessive peroxisome degradation that occurs after cessation of hypolipidemic drugs has been extensively investigated biochemically and morphologically. The evidence shows that the degradation of excess peroxisomes and peroxisomal enzymes is inhibited by 3-methyladenine (3-MA), a specific inhibitor of autophagy. Furthermore, in liver-specific autophagy-deficient mice, rapid removal of peroxisomes was exclusively impaired, and degradation of peroxisomal enzymes was not detected. Thus, the significant contribution of autophagic machinery to peroxisomal degradation in mammals was confirmed. However, the important question of the mechanism for the selective recognition of peroxisomes by autophagosomes remains to be fully elucidated.     

Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 receptor, Pex5p, suggests the presence of a quality control mechanism during peroxisomal matrix protein import

PEX genes encode proteins (peroxins) that are required for the biogenesis of peroxisomes. One of these peroxins, Pex5p, is the receptor for matrix proteins with a type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1), which shuttles newly synthesized proteins from the cytosol into the peroxisome matrix. We observed that in various Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex mutants disturbed in the early stages of PTS1 import, the steady-state levels of Pex5p are enhanced relative to wild type controls. Furthermore, we identified ubiquitinated forms of Pex5p in deletion mutants of those PEX genes that have been implicated in recycling of Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane into the cytosol. Pex5p ubiquitination required the presence of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p and the peroxins that are required during early stages of PTS1 protein import. Finally, we provide evidence that the proteasome is involved in the turnover of Pex5p in wild type yeast cells, a process that requires Ubc4p and occurs at the peroxisomal membrane. Our data suggest that during receptor recycling a portion of Pex5p becomes ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. We propose that this process represents a conserved quality control mechanism in peroxisome biogenesis.