Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 receptor, Pex5p, suggests the presence of a quality control mechanism during peroxisomal matrix protein import

PEX genes encode proteins (peroxins) that are required for the biogenesis of peroxisomes. One of these peroxins, Pex5p, is the receptor for matrix proteins with a type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1), which shuttles newly synthesized proteins from the cytosol into the peroxisome matrix. We observed that in various Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex mutants disturbed in the early stages of PTS1 import, the steady-state levels of Pex5p are enhanced relative to wild type controls. Furthermore, we identified ubiquitinated forms of Pex5p in deletion mutants of those PEX genes that have been implicated in recycling of Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane into the cytosol. Pex5p ubiquitination required the presence of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p and the peroxins that are required during early stages of PTS1 protein import. Finally, we provide evidence that the proteasome is involved in the turnover of Pex5p in wild type yeast cells, a process that requires Ubc4p and occurs at the peroxisomal membrane. Our data suggest that during receptor recycling a portion of Pex5p becomes ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. We propose that this process represents a conserved quality control mechanism in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Pexophagy is responsible for 65% of cases of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) is a group of diseases caused by mutations in one of the peroxins, proteins responsible for biogenesis of the peroxisomes. In recent years, it became clear that many peroxins (e.g., PEX3 and PEX14) play additional roles in peroxisome homeostasis (such as promoting autophagic degradation of peroxisomes or pexophagy), which are often opposite to their originally established functions in peroxisome formation and maintenance. Even more interesting, the peroxins that make up the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) in yeast (Pex1, Pex6 and Pex15) or mammals (PEX1, PEX6, PEX26) are responsible for the downregulation of pexophagy. Moreover, this might be even their primary role in human: to prevent pexophagy by removing from the peroxisomal membrane the ubiquitinated peroxisomal matrix protein import receptor, Ub-PEX5, which is also a signal for the Ub-binding pexophagy receptor, NBR1. Remarkably, the peroxisomes rescued from pexophagy by autophagic inhibitors in PEX1^G843D (the most common PBD mutation) cells are able to import matrix proteins and improve their biochemical function suggesting that the AAA-complex per se is not essential for the protein import function in human. This paradigm-shifting discovery published in the current issue of Autophagy has raised hope for up to 65% of all PBD patients with various deficiencies in the AAA-complex. Recognizing PEX1, PEX6 and PEX26 as pexophagy suppressors will allow treating these patients with a new range of tools designed to target mammalian pexophagy.     

Formation of peroxisomes from peroxisomal ghosts in a peroxisome-deficient mammalian cell mutant upon complementation by protein microinjection

Most mammalian cell strains genetically deficient in peroxisome biogenesis have abnormal membrane structures called ghosts, containing integral peroxisomal membrane protein, PMP70, but lacking the peroxisomal matrix proteins. Upon genetic complementation, these mutants regain the ability of peroxisome biogenesis. It is postulated that, in this process, the ghosts act as the precursors of peroxisomes, but there has been no evidence to support this. In the present study, we investigated this issue by protein microinjection to a mutant Chinese hamster ovary cell line defective of PEX5, encoding a peroxisome-targeting signal receptor. When recombinant Pex5p and green fluorescent protein (GFP) carrying a peroxisome-targeting signal were co-injected into the mutant cells, the GFP fluorescence gathered over time to particulate structures where PMP70 was co-localized. This process was dependent on both Pex5p and the targeting signal, and, most importantly, occurred even in the presence of cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor. These findings suggest that the ghosts act as acceptors of matrix proteins in the peroxisome recovery process at least in the PEX5 mutant, and support the view that peroxisomes can grow by incorporating newly synthesized matrix proteins.     

The Arabidopsis pex12 and pex13 mutants are defective in both PTS1- and PTS2-dependent protein transport to peroxisomes

Peroxisome biogenesis requires various complex processes including organelle division, enlargement and protein transport. We have been studying a number of Arabidopsis apm mutants that display aberrant peroxisome morphology. Two of these mutants, apm2 and apm4, showed green fluorescent protein fluorescence in the cytosol as well as in peroxisomes, indicating a decrease of efficiency of peroxisome targeting signal 1 (PTS1)-dependent protein transport to peroxisomes. Interestingly, both mutants were defective in PTS2-dependent protein transport. Plant growth was more inhibited in apm4 than apm2 mutants, apparently because protein transport was more severely decreased in apm4 than in apm2 mutants. APM2 and APM4 were found to encode proteins homologous to the peroxins PEX13 and PEX12, respectively, which are thought to be involved in transporting matrix proteins into peroxisomes in yeasts and mammals. We show that APM2/PEX13 and APM4/PEX12 are localized on peroxisomal membranes, and that APM2/PEX13 interacts with PEX7, a cytosolic PTS2 receptor. Additionally, a PTS1 receptor, PEX5, was found to stall on peroxisomal membranes in both mutants, suggesting that PEX12 and PEX13 are components that are involved in protein transport on peroxisomal membranes in higher plants. Proteins homologous to PEX12 and PEX13 have previously been found in Arabidopsis but it is not known whether they are involved in protein transport to peroxisomes. Our findings reveal that APM2/PEX13 and APM4/PEX12 are responsible for matrix protein import to peroxisomes in planta.     

Alternative splicing suggests extended function of PEX26 in peroxisome biogenesis

Matsumoto and colleagues recently identified PEX26 as the gene responsible for complementation group 8 of the peroxisome biogenesis disorders and showed that it encodes an integral peroxisomal membrane protein with a single C-terminal transmembrane domain and a cytosolic N-terminus that interacts with the PEX1/PEX6 heterodimer through direct binding to the latter. They proposed that PEX26 functions as the peroxisomal docking factor for the PEX1/PEX6 heterodimer. Here, we identify new PEX26 disease alleles, localize the PEX6-binding domain to the N-terminal half of the protein (aa 29-174), and show that, at the cellular level, PEX26 deficiency impairs peroxisomal import of both PTS1- and PTS2-targeted matrix proteins. Also, we find that PEX26 undergoes alternative splicing to produce several splice forms--including one, PEX26- delta ex5, that maintains frame and encodes an isoform lacking the transmembrane domain of full-length PEX26 (PEX26-FL). Despite its cytosolic location, PEX26- delta ex5 rescues peroxisome biogenesis in PEX26-deficient cells as efficiently as does PEX26-FL. To test our observation that a peroxisomal location is not required for PEX26 function, we made a chimeric protein (PEX26-Mito) with PEX26 as its N-terminus and the targeting segment of a mitochondrial outer membrane protein (OMP25) at its C-terminus. We found PEX26-Mito localized to the mitochondria and directed all detectable PEX6 and a fraction of PEX1 to this extraperoxisomal location; yet PEX26-Mito retains the full ability to rescue peroxisome biogenesis in PEX26-deficient cells. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that a peroxisomal localization of PEX26 and PEX6 is not required for their function and that the interaction of PEX6 with PEX1 is dynamic. This model predicts that, once activated in an extraperoxisomal location, PEX1 moves to the peroxisome and completes the function of the PEX1/6 heterodimer.     

New insights into dynamic and functional assembly of the AAA peroxins, Pex1p and Pex6p, and their membrane receptor Pex26p in shuttling of PTS1-receptor Pex5p during peroxisome biogenesis

Peroxisome is a single-membrane organelle in eukaryotes. The functional importance of peroxisomes in humans is highlighted by peroxisome-deficient peroxisome biogenesis disorders such as Zellweger syndrome. Two AAA peroxins, Pex1p and Pex6p, are encoded by PEX1 and PEX6, the causal genes for PBDs of complementation groups 1 and 4, respectively. PEX26 responsible for peroxisome biogenesis disorders of complementation group 8 codes for C-tail-anchored type-II membrane peroxin Pex26p, the recruiter of Pex1p-Pex6p complexes to peroxisomes. Pex1p is targeted to peroxisomes in a manner dependent on ATP hydrolysis, while Pex6p targeting requires ATP but not its hydrolysis. Pex1p and Pex6p are most likely regulated in their peroxisomal localization onto Pex26p via conformational changes by ATPase cycle. Pex5p is the cytosolic receptor for peroxisome matrix proteins with peroxisome targeting signal type-1 and shuttles between the cytosol and peroxisomes. AAA peroxins are involved in the export from peroxisomes of Pex5p. Pex5p is ubiquitinated at the conserved cysteine11 in a form associated with peroxisomes. Pex5p with a mutation of the cysteine11 to alanine, termed Pex5p-C11A, abrogates peroxisomal import of proteins harboring peroxisome targeting signals 1 and 2 in wild-type cells. Pex5p-C11A is imported into peroxisomes but not exported, hence suggesting an essential role of the cysteine residue in the export of Pex5p.     

Peroxisome biogenesis and the role of protein import

Peroxisomes are metabolic organelles with enzymatic content that are found in virtually all cells and are involved in β-oxidation of fatty acids, hydrogen peroxide-based respiration and defence against oxidative stress. The steps of their biogenesis involves "peroxins", proteins encoded by PEX genes. Peroxins are involved in three key stages of peroxisome development: (1) import of peroxisomal membrane proteins; (2) import of peroxisomal matrix proteins and (3) peroxisome proliferation. Of these three areas, peroxisomal matrix-protein import is by far the best understood and accounts for most of the available published data on peroxisome biogenesis. Defects in peroxisome biogenesis result in peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs), which although rare, have no known cure to-date. This review explores current understanding of each key area in peroxisome biogenesis, paying particular attention to the role of protein import.     

The importomer peroxins are differentially required for peroxisome assembly and meiotic development in Podospora anserina: insights into a new peroxisome import pathway

Peroxisome biogenesis relies on two known peroxisome matrix protein import pathways that are mediated by the receptors PEX5 and PEX7. These pathways converge at the importomer, a peroxisome‐membrane complex that is required for protein translocation into peroxisomes and consists of docking and RING–finger subcomplexes. In the fungus Podospora anserina, the RING–finger peroxins are crucial for meiocyte formation, while PEX5, PEX7 or the docking peroxin PEX14 are not. Here we show that PEX14 and the PEX14‐related protein PEX14/17 are differentially involved in peroxisome import during development. PEX14/17 activity does not compensate for loss of PEX14 function, and elimination of both proteins has no effect on meiocyte differentiation. In contrast, the docking peroxin PEX13, and the peroxins implicated in peroxisome membrane biogenesis PEX3 and PEX19, are required for meiocyte formation. Remarkably, the PTS2 coreceptor PEX20 is also essential for meiocyte differentiation and this function does not require PEX5 or PEX7. This finding suggests that PEX20 can mediate the import receptor activity of specific peroxisome matrix proteins. Our results suggest a new pathway for peroxisome import, which relies on PEX20 as import receptor and which seems critically required for specific developmental processes, like meiocyte differentiation in P. anserina.     

Functional classification of Arabidopsis peroxisome biogenesis factors proposed from analyses of knockdown mutants

In higher plants, peroxisomes accomplish a variety of physiological functions such as lipid catabolism, photorespiration and hormone biosynthesis. Recently, many factors regulating peroxisomal biogenesis, so-called PEX genes, have been identified not only in plants but also in yeasts and mammals. In the Arabidopsis genome, the presence of at least 22 PEX genes has been proposed. Here, we clarify the physiological functions of 18 PEX genes for peroxisomal biogenesis by analyzing transgenic Arabidopsis plants that suppressed the PEX gene expression using RNA interference. The results indicated that the function of these PEX genes could be divided into two groups. One group involves PEX1, PEX2, PEX4, PEX6, PEX10, PEX12 and PEX13 together with previously characterized PEX5, PEX7 and PEX14. Defects in these genes caused loss of peroxisomal function due to misdistribution of peroxisomal matrix proteins in the cytosol. Of these, the pex10 mutant showed pleiotropic phenotypes that were not observed in any other pex mutants. In contrast, reduced peroxisomal function of the second group, including PEX3, PEX11, PEX16 and PEX19, was induced by morphological changes of the peroxisomes. Cells of the pex16 mutant in particular possessed reduced numbers of large peroxisome(s) that contained unknown vesicles. These results provide experimental evidence indicating that all of these PEX genes play pivotal roles in regulating peroxisomal biogenesis. We conclude that PEX genes belonging to the former group are involved in regulating peroxisomal protein import, whereas those of the latter group are important in maintaining the structure of peroxisome.     

The peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex prevents pexophagy and development of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) are metabolic disorders caused by the loss of peroxisomes. The majority of PBDs result from mutation in one of 3 genes that encode for the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) required for cycling PEX5 for peroxisomal matrix protein import. Mutations in these genes are thought to result in a defect in peroxisome assembly by preventing the import of matrix proteins. However, we show here that loss of the AAA-complex does not prevent matrix protein import, but instead causes an upregulation of peroxisome degradation by macroautophagy, or pexophagy. The loss of AAA-complex function in cells results in the accumulation of ubiquitinated PEX5 on the peroxisomal membrane that signals pexophagy. Inhibiting autophagy by genetic or pharmacological approaches rescues peroxisome number, protein import and function. Our findings suggest that the peroxisomal AAA-complex is required for peroxisome quality control, whereas its absence results in the selective degradation of the peroxisome. Thus the loss of peroxisomes in PBD patients with mutations in their peroxisomal AAA-complex is a result of increased pexophagy. Our study also provides a framework for the development of novel therapeutic treatments for PBDs.     

The Arabidopsis peroxisomal targeting signal type 2 receptor PEX7 is necessary for peroxisome function and dependent on PEX5

Plant peroxisomal proteins catalyze key metabolic reactions. Several peroxisome biogenesis PEROXIN (PEX) genes encode proteins acting in the import of targeted proteins necessary for these processes into the peroxisomal matrix. Most peroxisomal matrix proteins bear characterized Peroxisomal Targeting Signals (PTS1 or PTS2), which are bound by the receptors PEX5 or PEX7, respectively, for import into peroxisomes. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of an Arabidopsis peroxin mutant, pex7-1, which displays peroxisome-defective phenotypes including reduced PTS2 protein import. We also demonstrate that the pex5-1 PTS1 receptor mutant, which contains a lesion in a domain conserved among PEX7-binding proteins from various organisms, is defective not in PTS1 protein import, but rather in PTS2 protein import. Combining these mutations in a pex7-1 pex5-1 double mutant abolishes detectable PTS2 protein import and yields seedlings that are entirely sucrose-dependent for establishment, suggesting a severe block in peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation. Adult pex7-1 pex5-1 plants have reduced stature and bear abnormally shaped seeds, few of which are viable. The pex7-1 pex5-1 seedlings that germinate have dramatically fewer lateral roots and often display fused cotyledons, phenotypes associated with reduced auxin response. Thus PTS2-directed peroxisomal import is necessary for normal embryonic development, seedling establishment, and vegetative growth.     

The Role of Conserved PEX3 Regions in PEX19-Binding and Peroxisome Biogenesis

The human peroxins PEX3 and PEX19 are essential for peroxisome biogenesis. They mediate the import of membrane proteins as well as the de novo formation of peroxisomes. PEX19 binds newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins post-translationally and directs them to peroxisomes by engaging PEX3, a protein anchored in the peroxisomal membrane. After protein insertion into the lipid bilayer, PEX19 is released back to the cytosol. Crystallographic analysis provided detailed insights into the PEX3-PEX19 interaction and identified three highly conserved regions, the PEX19-binding region, a hydrophobic groove and an acidic cluster, on the surface of PEX3. Here, we used site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical and functional assays to determine the role of these regions in PEX19-binding and peroxisome biogenesis. Mutations in the PEX19-binding region reduce the affinity for PEX19 and destabilize PEX3. Furthermore, we provide evidence for a crucial function of the PEX3-PEX19 complex during de novo formation of peroxisomes in peroxisome-deficient cells, pointing to a dual function of the PEX3-PEX19 interaction in peroxisome biogenesis. The maturation of preperoxisomes appears to require the hydrophobic groove near the base of PEX3, presumably by its involvement in peroxisomal membrane protein insertion, while the acidic cluster does not appear to be functionally relevant.     

PEX5 and Ubiquitin Dynamics on Mammalian Peroxisome Membranes

Peroxisomes are membrane-bound organelles within eukaryotic cells that post-translationally import folded proteins into their matrix. Matrix protein import requires a shuttle receptor protein, usually PEX5, that cycles through docking with the peroxisomal membrane, ubiquitination, and export back into the cytosol followed by deubiquitination. Matrix proteins associate with PEX5 in the cytosol and are translocated into the peroxisome lumen during the PEX5 cycle. This cargo translocation step is not well understood, and its energetics remain controversial. We use stochastic computational models to explore different ways the AAA ATPase driven removal of PEX5 may couple with cargo translocation in peroxisomal importers of mammalian cells. The first model considered is uncoupled, in which translocation is spontaneous, and does not immediately depend on PEX5 removal. The second is directly coupled, in which cargo translocation only occurs when its PEX5 is removed from the peroxisomal membrane. The third, novel, model is cooperatively coupled and requires two PEX5 on a given importomer for cargo translocation — one PEX5 with associated cargo and one with ubiquitin. We measure both the PEX5 and the ubiquitin levels on the peroxisomes as we vary the matrix protein cargo addition rate into the cytosol. We find that both uncoupled and directly coupled translocation behave identically with respect to PEX5 and ubiquitin, and the peroxisomal ubiquitin signal increases as the matrix protein traffic increases. In contrast, cooperatively coupled translocation behaves dramatically differently, with a ubiquitin signal that decreases with increasing matrix protein traffic. Recent work has shown that ubiquitin on mammalian peroxisome membranes can lead to selective degradation by autophagy, or ‘pexophagy.’ Therefore, the high ubiquitin level for low matrix cargo traffic with cooperatively coupled protein translocation could be used as a disuse signal to mediate pexophagy. This mechanism may be one way that cells could regulate peroxisome numbers.     

Rapid isolation and characterization of CHO mutants deficient in peroxisome biogenesis using the peroxisomal forms of fluorescent proteins

We isolated and characterized CHO mutants deficient in peroxisome assembly using green fluorescent protein (GFP) and blue fluorescent protein (BFP) as the fluorescent probes to study the molecular mechanism of peroxisome biogenesis. We used stable transformants of CHO cells expressing GFP appending peroxisome targeting signal-1 (PTS1) and/or peroxisome targeting signal-2 (PTS2) as the parent strains for rapid isolation of the mutants. We have obtained six peroxisome-deficient mutants by visual screening of the mislocalizations of the peroxisomal GFPs. Mutual cell fusion experiments indicated that the six mutants isolated were divided into four complementation groups. Several of the mutants obtained possessed defective genes: the PEX2 gene was defective in SK24 and PT54; the PEX5 gene in SK32 and the PEX7 gene in PT13 and PT32. BE41, which belonged to the fourth complementation group, was not determined. When peroxisomal forms of BFP were transiently expressed in mutant cells, the peroxisomal BFPs appending both PTS1 and PTS2 appeared to bypass either the PTS1 or PTS2 pathway for localization in SK32. This observation suggested that other important machinery, in addition to the PTS1 or PTS2 pathway, could be involved in peroxisome biogenesis. Thus, our approach using peroxisomal fluorescent proteins could facilitate the isolation and analysis of peroxisome-deficient CHO mutants and benefit studies on the identification and role of the genes responsible for peroxisome biogenesis.     

The interaction between human PEX3 and PEX19 characterized by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis

The process of peroxisome biogenesis involves several PEX genes that encode the machinery required to assemble the organelle. Among the corresponding peroxins the interaction between PEX3 and PEX19 is essential for early peroxisome biogenesis. However, the intracellular site of this protein interaction is still unclear. To address this question by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis, we engineered the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) to the C-terminus of PEX3 and the enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (ECFP) to the N-terminus of PEX19. Functionality of the fusion proteins was shown by transfection of human PEX3- and PEX19-deficient fibroblasts from Zellweger patients with tagged versions of PEX3 and PEX19. This led to reformation of import-competent peroxisomes in both cell lines previously lacking detectable peroxisomal membrane structures. The interaction of PEX3-EYFP with ECFP-PEX19 in a PEX3-deficient cell line during peroxisome biogenesis was visualized by FRET imaging. Although PEX19 was predominantly localized to the cytoplasma, the peroxisome was identified to be the main intracellular site of the PEX3-PEX19 interaction. Results were confirmed and quantified by donor fluorescence photobleaching experiments. PEX3 deletion proteins lacking the N-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence (PEX3 34-373-EYFP) or the PEX19-binding domain located in the C-terminal half of the protein (PEX3 1-140-EYFP) did not show the characteristic peroxisomal localization of PEX3, but were mislocalized to the cytoplasm (PEX3 34-373-EYFP) or to the mitochondria (PEX3 1-140-EYFP) and did not interact with ECFP-PEX19. We suggest that FRET is a suitable tool to gain quantitative spatial information about the interaction of peroxins during the process of peroxisome biogenesis in single cells. These findings complement and extend data from conventional in vitro protein interaction assays and support the hypothesis of PEX3 being an anchor for PEX19 at the peroxisomal membrane.     

Genomic organization and characterization of human PEX2 encoding a 35-kDa peroxisomal membrane protein

Peroxins are proteins involved in peroxisome biogenesis and are encoded by PEX genes. The human PEX2 gene encodes a 35-kDa peroxisomal integral membrane protein which is a member of the zinc finger protein family. Mutations in the PEX2 gene are the primary defect in a subset of patients with Zellweger syndrome and related peroxisome biogenesis disorders. The role of zinc finger proteins in peroxisome assembly and function is poorly understood. Here we report the cloning and characterisation of the human PEX2 structural gene. PEX2 was assigned to human chromosome 8q13-q21 and its murine homologue to mouse chromosome 3. The gene is approximately 17.5 kb in length, and contains four exons. The entire coding sequence is included in one exon, exon 4. The 5'-flanking region has features of housekeeping genes (GC enrichment, two Sp1 sites) and tissue-specific, inducible genes (two CCAAT boxes). In more than 1.5 kb of 5'-flanking sequences we did not identify consensus peroxisomal proliferator responsive elements (PPRE).     

The peroxisomal import proteins PEX2, PEX5 and PEX7 are differently involved in Podospora anserina sexual cycle

PEX5, PEX7 and PEX2 are involved in the peroxisomal matrix protein import machinery. PEX5 and PEX7 are the receptors for the proteins harbouring, respectively, a PTS1 and a PTS2 peroxisomal targeting sequence and cycle between the cytoplasm and the peroxisome. PEX2 belongs to the RING-finger complex located in the peroxisomal membrane and acts in protein import downstream of PEX5 and PEX7; it is therefore required for the import of both PTS1 and PTS2 proteins. We have shown previously that PEX2 deficiency leads to an impairment of meiotic commitment in the filamentous fungus Podospora anserina. Here we report that both PEX5 and PEX7 receptors are dispensable for this commitment but are needed for normal sexual cycle. Data suggest also a new role of PEX2 and/or the RING-finger complex in addition to their role in PTS1 and PTS2 import. Strikingly, Deltapex5 and Deltapex7 single and double knockout strains analyses indicate that Deltapex7 acts as a partial suppressor of Deltapex5 life cycle deficiencies. Moreover, contrary to pex2 mutants, Deltapex5 and Deltapex7 show mitochondrial morphological abnormalities.     

Getting a camel through the eye of a needle: the import of folded proteins by peroxisomes

Peroxisomes are a family of organelles which have many unusual features. They can arise de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum by a still poorly characterized process, yet possess a unique machinery for the import of their matrix proteins. As peroxisomes lack DNA, their function, which is highly variable and dependent on developmental and/or environmental conditions, is determined by the post‐translational import of specific metabolic enzymes in folded or oligomeric states. The two classes of matrix targeting signals for peroxisomal proteins [PTS1 (peroxisomal targeting signal 1) and PTS2] are recognized by cytosolic receptors [PEX5 (peroxin 5) and PEX7 respectively] which escort their cargo proteins to, or possibly across, the peroxisome membrane. Although the membrane translocation mechanism remains unclear, it appears to be driven by thermodynamically favourable binding interactions. Recycling of the receptors from the peroxisome membrane requires ATP hydrolysis for two linked processes: ubiquitination of PEX5 (and the PEX7 co‐receptors in yeast) and the function of two peroxisome‐associated AAA (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) ATPases, which play a role in recycling or turnover of the ubiquitinated receptors. This review summarizes and integrates recent findings on peroxisome matrix protein import from yeast, plant and mammalian model systems, and discusses some of the gaps in our understanding of this remarkable protein transport system.     

Characterization of the role of the receptors PEX5 and PEX7 in the import of proteins into glycosomes of Trypanosoma brucei

Peroxins 5 and 7 are receptors for protein import into the peroxisomal matrix. We studied the involvement of these peroxins in the biogenesis of glycosomes in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei. Glycosomes are peroxisome-like organelles in which a major part of the glycolytic pathway is sequestered. We here report the characterization of the T. brucei homologue of PEX7 and provide several data strongly suggesting that it can bind to PEX5. Depletion of PEX5 or PEX7 by RNA interference had a severe effect on the growth of both the bloodstream-form of the parasite, that relies entirely on glycolysis for its ATP supply, and the procyclic form representative of the parasite living in the tsetse-fly midgut and in which also other metabolic pathways play a prominent role. The role of the two receptors in import of glycosomal matrix proteins with different types of peroxisome/glycosome-targeting signals (PTS) was analyzed by immunofluorescence and subcellular fractionation studies. Knocking down the expression of either receptor gene resulted, in procyclic cells, in the mislocalization of proteins with both a type 1 or 2 targeting motif (PTS1, PTS2) located at the C- and N-termini, respectively, and proteins with a sequence-internal signal (I-PTS) to the cytosol. Electron microscopy confirmed the apparent integrity of glycosomes in these procyclic cells. In bloodstream-form trypanosomes, PEX7 depletion seemed to affect only the subcellular distribution of PTS2-proteins. Western blot analysis suggested that, in both life-cycle stages of the trypanosome, the levels of both receptors are controlled in a coordinated fashion, by a mechanism that remains to be determined. The observation that both PEX5 and PEX7 are essential for the viability of the parasite indicates that the respective branches of the glycosome-import pathway in which each receptor acts might be interesting drug targets.