Prognostic Role of Phospho-STAT3 in Patients with Cancers of the Digestive System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveThe definite prognostic role of p-STAT3 has not been well defined. We performed a meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic role of p-STAT3 expression in patients with digestive system cancers.MethodsWe searched the available articles reporting the prognostic value of p-STAT3 in patients with cancers of the digestive system, mainly including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophagus cancer and pancreatic cancer. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were used to assess the prognostic role of p-STAT3 expression level in cancer tissues. And the association between p-STAT3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated.ResultsA total of 22 studies with 3585 patients were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. The results showed that elevated p-STAT3 expression level predicted inferior OS (HR=1.809, 95% CI: 1.442-2.270, P<0.001) and DFS (HR=1.481, 95% CI: 1.028-2.133, P= 0.035) in patients with malignant cancers of the digestive system. Increased expression of p-STAT3 is significantly related with tumor cell differentiation (Odds ratio (OR) =1.895, 95% CI: 1.364-2.632, P<0.001) and lymph node metastases (OR=2.108, 95% CI: 1.104-4.024, P=0.024). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the pooled HR was stable and omitting a single study did not change the significance of the pooled HR. Funnel plots and Egger’s tests revealed there was no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis.ConclusionPhospho-STAT3 might be a prognostic factor of patients with digestive system cancers. More well designed studies with adequate follow-up are needed to gain a thorough understanding of the prognostic role of p-STAT3.     

Prognostic impact of pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in advanced epithelial cancers: a meta-analysis

Background

There is increasing evidence that inflammation-based biomarkers are associated with tumor microenvironment which plays important roles in cancer progression. A high lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), has been suggested to indicate favorable prognoses in various epithelial cancers. We performed a meta-analysis to quantify the prognostic value of LMR in advanced-stage epithelial cancers undergoing various treatment.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Library up to July 2018 for relevant studies. We included studies assessing the prognostic impact of pretreatment LMR on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced-stage epithelial cancers. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

A total of 8984 patients from 35 studies were included. A high pretreatment LMR was associated with favorable OS (HR?=?0.578, 95% CI 0.522–0.641, P?<?0.001) and PFS (HR?=?0.598, 95% CI 0.465–0.768, P?<?0.001). The effect of LMR on OS was observed among various tumor types. A higher pretreatment LMR was associated with improved OS in chemotherapy (n?=?10, HR?=?0.592, 95% CI 0.518–0.676, P?<?0.001), surgery (n?=?10, HR?=?0.683, 95% CI 0.579–0.807, P?<?0.001) and combined therapy (n?=?11, HR?=?0.507, 95% CI 0.442–0.582, P?<?0.001) in the subgroup analysis by different therapeutic strategies. The cut-off value for LMR was 3.0 (range?=?2.35–5.46). Subgroup analysis according to the cut-off value showed a significant prognostic value of LMR on OS and PFS in both subgroups.

Conclusions

A high pretreatment LMR is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in advanced-stage epithelial cancers undergoing different therapeutic strategies. LMR could be used to improve clinical decision-making regarding treatment in advanced epithelial cancers.

     

Prognostic value of pre-treatment red blood cell distribution width in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, increasing studies found that pre-treatment red blood cell distribution width (RDW) could predict clinical outcomes in various cancers. However, the prognostic value of pre-treatment RDW in lung cancer was inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine prognostic value of pre-treatment RDW in lung cancer.

Methods: We performed a search in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE (via OVID), Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed databases, then we identified all records up to February 15, 2019. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the relevance of pre-treatment RDW to OS in lung cancer.

Results: We included ten articles in total. Pooled results revealed that elevated pre-treatment RDW was significantly associated with poor OS (HR?=?1.55, 95% CI: 1.26–1.92, p?<?0.001) and DFS (HR?=?1.53, 95% Cl: 1.15–2.05; p?=?0.004) in lung cancer. Further subgroup analysis manifested that lung cancer patients with elevated pre-treatment RDW had worse prognosis.

Conclusions: A higher value of pre-treatment RDW indicated worse survival of patients with lung cancer. RDW may serve as a reliable and economical marker for prediction of lung cancer prognosis.     

Pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index may serve as a potential biomarker in urinary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To investigate the potential prognostic role of pre-treatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in urinary cancers.

Methods

Relevant articles were searched comprehensively from PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, up to November 2018. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to evaluate their associations.

Result

A total of 12 related articles including 6561 patients were ultimately enrolled. Our results indicated that a relatively lower level of pre-treatment PNI was associated with decreased OS, CSS/DSS and DFS/RFS/PFS (pooled HR?=?1.68, 95% CI 1.45–1.95; pooled HR?=?1.57, 95% CI 1.33–1.86; pooled HR?=?1.75, 95% CI 1.53–1.99, respectively). Subsequent stratified analysis by cancer type for OS showed that PNI could also be a predictor no matter in renal cell cancer (RCC) or bladder cancer (BC) (pooled HR?=?1.65, 95% CI 1.37–1.97 and pooled HR?=?1.67, 95% CI 1.20–2.33). Similar results could be found in DFS/RFS/PFS (RCC: HR?=?1.81, 95% CI 1.54–2.13 and BC: HR?=?1.68, 95% CI 1.32–2.12) and in CSS/DSS (RCC: HR?=?1.50, 95% CI 1.23–1.82 and upper tract urothelial carcinoma: HR?=?1.61, 95% CI 1.13–2.28). As for the treatment subgroup, a relatively lower level of PNI could also be a positive predictor for OS (surgery: HR?=?1.64, 95% CI 1.40–1.93; target therapy: HR?=?1.88, 95% CI 1.34–2.63) and DFS/RFS/PFS (surgery: HR?=?1.69, 95% CI 1.47–1.95; target therapy: HR?=?2.14, 95% CI 1.50–3.05).

Conclusion

The outcomes of us shed light on that elevated pre-treatment PNI was positively associated with OS, CSS/DSS and DFS/RFS/PFS, indicating that it could be an independent prognostic factor in urinary cancers.

     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of higher expression of folate receptor alpha (FOLR1) predicts poor cancer prognosis

Abstract

Folate receptor alpha (FOLR1), a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked protein, is a well characterized folate transporter. However, the prognostic power of FOLR1 in cancer remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic roles of FOLR1 on different cancers. Twelve studies involving 4471 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis indicated that high FOLR1 significantly predicted poor overall survival (OS) (pooled hazard ratio (HR)?=?0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI)?=?0.64–0.94, p?=?0.009) and the disease-free survival (DFS) (HR?=?1.25, 95% CI?=?1.07–1.47, p?=?0.005). Subgroup analyses based on tumour type found that high FOLR1 level was associated with poor OS in breast cancer (HR?=?2.66, 95% CI?=?1.54–4.59, p?=?0.0005) and endometrial carcinoma (HR?=?1.30, 95% CI?=?1.05–1.61, p?=?0.02). However, FOLR1 has relatively weakly correlation with gender, tumour size and chemotherapy. Additionally, overexpression of FOLR1 was correlated with grade, FIGO stage, vital status and nodule status. The present meta-analysis indicated that the high expression of FOLR1 is associated with the poor survival of cancer patients, which is helpful for the clinical decision-making process.     

Prognostic utility and clinical significance of lysyl oxidase-like 2 protein expression in digestive system cancers

Lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) participates in the occurrence and development of digestive system cancers (DSCs). The aim of this study was to determine whether LOXL2 protein could serve as a prognostic biomarker in patients with DSCs. Relevant studies published before October 1, 2018 were identified from a comprehensive literature review in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. This meta-analysis was conducted via STATA/SE 14.1 software. Finally, a total of 12 publications and 6 different kinds of DSCs were identified. Meta-analysis indicated that increased expression of LOXL2 protein was significantly correlated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–1.72) and worse progression-free survival/disease-free survival (HR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.48–2.83) in cases with DSCs. In addition, clinicopathological parameters, including tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and clinical stage were significantly related to LOXL2 protein expression in DSCs. High LOXL2 protein expression is significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes in DSCs and its expression level may represent a candidate prognostic biomarker in these cancers.     

Lymphatic microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor-C and -D as prognostic factors in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

The use of lymphatic microvessel density (LVD) and pro-lymphangiogenic mediators as prognostic factors for survival in breast cancer remains controversial. We searched the electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE without language restrictions for relevant literature to aggregate the survival results. To be eligible, every study had to include the assessment of the LVD or the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C or -D in patients with breast cancer and provide a survival comparison, including disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), according to the LVD, VEGF-C or VEGF-D status. Across all studies, 56.64?% of patients were considered to have a VEGF-C-positive tumor, and 65.54?% of patients had VEGF-D-positive tumors. High LVD had an unfavorable impact on DFS, with a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 2.222 (95?% CI 1.579–3.126) and an OS with a HR of 2.493 (95?% CI 1.183–5.25). According to the different lymphatic makers, the subgroup HR in the D2-40 studies was 2.431 (95?%?CI 1.622–3.644) for DFS and 4.085 (95?% CI 1.896–8.799) for OS. VEGF-C overexpression, as assessed by immunochemistry, was a prognostic factor for decreased DFS (HR 2.164; 95?% CI 1.256–3.729) and for decreased OS (HR 2.613; 95?% CI 1.637–4.170). VEGF-D overexpression was a significant although weak prognostic factor for DFS only when assessed by immunochemistry, with a HR of 2.108 (95?% CI 1.014–4.384). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that LVD, VEGF-C and VEGF-D could predict poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. However, standardization of the assessment of LVD and for the expression of lymphangiogenesis factors is needed.     

Prognostic Value of miR-21 in Various Cancers: An Updating Meta-Analysis

Background

Recently, more and more studies investigated the value of microRNA (miRNA) as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker in various cancers. MiR-21 was found dysregulated in almost all types of cancers. While the prognostic role of miR-21 in many cancers has been studied, the results were not consistent.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the correlation between miR-21 and survival of general cancers by calculating pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

The pooled results of 63 published studies showed that elevated miR-21 was a predictor for poor survival of general carcinomas, with pooled HR of 1.91 (95%CI: 1.66–2.19) for OS, 1.42 (95% CI: 1.16–1.74) for DFS and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.64–2.96) for RFS/CSS. MiR-21 was also a prognostic biomarker in the patients who received adjuvant therapy, with pooled HR of 2.4 (95%CI: 1.18–4.9) for OS.

Conclusions

Our results showed that miR-21 could act as a significant biomarker in the prognosis of various cancers. Further studies are warranted before the application of the useful biomarker in the clinical.     

Prognostic value of Ki-67 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

The prognostic value of Ki-67 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was controversial according to previous studies. We aimed to clarify the association between K-67 expression and survival in NPC through meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the potential prognostic effect of Ki-67 on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in NPC. A total of 13 studies comprising 1314 NPC patients were included. High Ki-67 expression was associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR]= 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.97–3.71, P<0.001), DFS (HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.49–2.50, P<0.001), and LRFS (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.11–3.12, P=0.019). However, there was no significant association between Ki-67 and DMFS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.78–2.38, P=0.270). Furthermore, the prognostic role of Ki-67 was maintained throughout different sample sizes, analyses of HR, and study designs for OS and DFS in various subgroups. Elevated Ki-67 expression is a reliable prognostic factor for poorer survival outcomes in NPC.     

Prognostic Role of microRNA-21 in Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Background

To date, many studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNA) exhibit altered expression in various cancers and may play an important role as prognostic biomarker of cancers. The present meta-analysis summarizes the recent advances in the use of microRNA-21 (miR-21) in the assessment of colorectal cancer and analyzes the prognostic role of miR-21 for survival outcome.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The present meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed through multiple search strategies. Data were extracted from studies comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer who showed higher expression of miR-21 than similar patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of miR-21 for survival and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Seven studies with a total of 1174 patients were included this meta-analysis. For overall survival (OS), the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of higher miR-21 expression in colorectal cancer was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.34–2.32, P=0.000). After elimination of heterogeneity, the pooled HR was 2.32 (95% CI: 1.82–2.97, P=0.000), which was found to significantly predict poorer survival. The subgroup analysis suggested that elevated miR-21 level and patients’ survival correlated with III/IV stage (HR=5.35, 95% CI: 3.73–7.66).

Conclusions/Significance

The present findings suggest that high expression of miR-21 might predict poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.     

Prognostic significance of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is aberrantly expressed in solid tumors. Considering conflicting data, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate its prognostic role. Electronic databases were searched to collect studies about associations between XIAP expressions and survival outcomes. Hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized as effect size estimates. A total of 3,794 patients from 21 published studies were included. The results revealed that high XIAP expressions correlated with age (OR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.07–3.84), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.02–2.77), histological grade (OR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.01–4.11), and tumor stage (OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.20–3.96). The combined HR revealed that high XIAP expressions associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.22–2.10). Our study suggested high XIAP expressions may be indicative of poor prognosis in solid tumors.     

The prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a potential prognostic biomarker to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and disease progression in melanoma patients, yet results remain inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the prognostic value of ctDNA in melanoma.ObjectivesTo describe the clinical prognostic value of ctDNA for melanoma patients.MethodsSearched for eligible articles from Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between ctDNA at baseline or during treatment and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 9 articles were obtained, involving 617 melanoma patients. The pooled HRs revealed that compared with baseline undetectable ctDNA patients, detectable ctDNA was highly correlated with poor OS (HR 2.91, 95% CI: 2.22–3.82; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 2.75, 95% CI: 1.98–3.83; p < 0.001). A meta-analysis of these adjusted HRs was performed and confirmed that ctDNA collected at baseline was associated with poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 3.00, 95% CI 2.19–4.11, p < 0.001/PFS: HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.77–4.06, p < 0.001). During treatment, a significant association was shown between ctDNA and poorer OS/PFS (OS: HR 6.26, 95% CI 2.48–15.80, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 4.93, 95% CI 2.36–10.33, p < 0.001).ConclusionInvestigation and application of ctDNA will improve "liquid biopsy" and play a role in early prediction, monitoring disease progression and precise adjusting treatment strategies in melanoma patients.     

Prognostic value of periostin in multiple solid cancers: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Previous studies have shown that the expression of periostin (POSTN) is significantly correlated with prognosis in multiple solid cancers. However, the function of POSTN in tumorigenesis and its relationship with clinical outcomes have not been systematically summarized and analyzed. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic pertinence of POSTN in solid cancer. We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases, and a total of 10 studies were used to assess the association of POSTN expression and patients’ overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were further calculated to estimate the association between POSTN and relevant clinical parameters of solid cancer patients. The pooled results indicated that POSTN overexpression was associated with poor OS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.88–2.93, p < .00001) and DFS (HR = 2.70, 95% CI = 2.00–3.65, p < .00001) in a cohort of 993 patients with cancer. Subsequent analyses showed that the positive expression ratio of POSTN was evidently higher in cancer tissues than in normal tissues (OR = 7.44, 95% CI = 3.66–13.95, p < .00001). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that POSTN was related to microvascular invasion (OR = 5.09, 95% CI = 3.07–8.44, p < .00001), tumor differentiation (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.41–2.91, p = .0001), and lymph node metastasis (OR = 3.05, 95% CI = 2.01–4.64, p < .00001). These data showed that POSTN could be a credible prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in human solid cancer.     

Association of programmed death ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression with treatment outcomes in patients with BRAF mutation‐positive melanoma treated with vemurafenib or cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib

The prognostic significance of programmed death ligand‐1 (PD ‐L1) on treatment outcomes in patients receiving BRAF with or without MEK inhibitors is not well understood. This retrospective exploratory analysis evaluated the association of tumour PD ‐L1 expression with progression‐free survival (PFS ) and overall survival (OS ) among 210 patients in the coBRIM trial treated with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib or placebo plus vemurafenib. In the vemurafenib cohort, there was a trend of increased PFS and OS in those with PD ‐L1⁺ melanoma, with hazard ratios (HR s; PD ‐L1⁺ vs. PD ‐L1^?) of 0.70 (95% CI , 0.46–1.07) and 0.69 (95% CI , 0.42–1.13) for PFS and OS , respectively. However, in patients treated with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib, a similar trend was not observed with HR s (PD ‐L1⁺ versus PD ‐L1^?) of 1.04 (95% CI , 0.66–1.68) and 0.94 (95% CI , 0.57–1.57) for PFS and OS , respectively. The combination cobimetinib plus vemurafenib appears to overcome the poor prognosis associated with low PD ‐L1 expression.     

Pilot study of DNA methylation-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and survival in pediatric medulloblastoma

IntroductionMethylation-derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (mdNLR) has been identified as a potential prognostic biomarker of outcomes in various cancers. We evaluated the prognostic value of blood-derived mdNLR within a retrospective cohort of pediatric medulloblastoma patients.Materials and methodsDNA methylation was measured in archival peripheral blood samples collected on 56 pediatric medulloblastoma patients. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between mdNLR and survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsCompared to patients who were alive at last follow-up (n = 43), the mean mdNLR value was slightly higher in deceased patients (n = 13) (12.3 vs. 5.2,P = 0.163). Elevated log-transformed mdNLR was suggestively associated with an increased likelihood of death in unadjusted models (HR=1.43, 95%CI: 0.92–2.22) and significantly associated with mortality in adjusted models (HR=1.61, 95%CI: 1.01–2.58).DiscussionFuture work is warranted to investigate the relationship between mdNLR outcomes in specific pediatric medulloblastoma molecular subgroups.     

The Impact of Androgen Receptor Expression on Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis

Recent studies have highlighted the role of androgen receptor (AR) as a prognostic biomarker of breast cancer. However, its predictive role in disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) still remains inconclusive. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the association between AR and survival outcomes in breast cancer and also identify this association by a meta-analysis of published researches. Clinical data from 109 patients with breast cancer, who underwent surgery at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, were retrospectively analyzed for immunohistochemical AR expression measured by tissue microarray. For meta-analysis, articles available in Pubmed on the relationship between AR and breast cancer outcomes were included. Data obtained from both were combined and analyzed. Women with AR positive tumors in the retrospective study had a significantly better DFS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.88) and OS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.85) than women with AR negative ones. Meta-analysis showed that AR expression in breast tumors was an indicator of better DFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.64). In subgroup analysis, AR could predict DFS outcome in estrogen receptor (ER) positive (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.34-0.59), ER negative (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.67), and triple negative breast cancer (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69). Moreover, in ER positive breast cancer patients, the expression of AR could predict better OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.82). The present analysis indicated that AR expression was associated with lower risk of recurrence in patients with all breast cancer types and better OS in cases with ER positive.     

Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio as a biomarker for clinical outcomes in advanced stage melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) and eosinophil counts are associated with improved survival in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but no study has investigated neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratios (NER) as a predictive indicator in this population. In this retrospective study evaluating anti-PD-1 treated patients with advanced melanoma, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and risk of high-grade (grade ≥3) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared between groups defined by median pretreatment NLR and NER as well as median NLR and NER at 1-month post-treatment. Lower baseline NLR and NER were associated with improved OS [HR: 0.504, 95% CI: 0.328–0.773, p = .002 and HR: 0.442, 95% CI: 0.288–0.681, p < .001, respectively] on univariate testing. After accounting for multiple covariates, our multivariate analysis found that lower pretreatment NER was associated with better ORR (by irRECIST) (OR: 2.199, 95% CI: 1.071–4.582, p = .033) and improved OS (HR: 0.480, 95% CI: 0.296–0.777, p = .003). Baseline NLR, 1-month NLR, and 1-month NER were not associated with ORR, PFS, or OS outcomes; but 1-month NER correlated with lower risk of grade ≥3 irAEs (OR: 0.392, 95% CI: 0.165–0.895, p = .029). Our findings suggest baseline NER merits additional investigation as a novel prognostic marker for advanced melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1-based regimens.     

Prognostic and diagnostic significance of circRNAs expression in lung cancer

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have spurred considerable interest in numerous tumors. We aimed to investigate the clinical, prognostic, and diagnostic roles of circRNAs in human lung cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, CBM, and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 24, 2018. Eligible studies about the relationship between circRNAs expression and clinical, prognostic, and diagnostic outcomes in patients with lung cancer were in our study. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were to investigate clinical parameters, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs to estimate overall survival (OS). A total of 23 relevant studies were eligible, with 15 on clinicopathological features, 14 on prognosis, and six on diagnosis. For clinical features, high expression of oncogenic circRNAs was remarkably related to poor clinical parameters. Whereas, the results of tumor-suppressor circRNAs were the complete opposite. For the prognostic roles, oncogenic circRNAs had an unfavorable impact on overall survival (OS: HR = 3.24, 95% Cl: 2.70–3.77), and elevated level of tumor-suppressor circRNAs was correlated with longer survival (OS: HR = 0.57, 95% Cl: 0.43–0.70). For the diagnostic values, the pooled result showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86, with 77% sensitivity and 81% specificity in distinguishing patients with lung cancer from healthy ones. The above results suggested that circRNAs have the potential to be novel indicators for prognostic and diagnostic evaluation of patients with lung cancer.     

Effects of metastasectomy and other factors on survival of patients with ovarian metastases from gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer (Krukenberg tumor [KT]) has no consensus treatment and the role of surgical treatment is still controversial. Identifying prognostic factors for KT could help guide the management of this tumor. We used a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of metastasectomy and other factors in patients with KT to develop a treatment plan. We searched literature in PubMed, Cochrane library and EMBASE. We analyzed hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with respect to overall survival (OS). The meta-analysis included 12 cohort studies with 1,031 patients associated with longer OS following metastasectomy (HR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.32–0.53; P < 0.001), R0 resection (HR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.26–0.53; P < 0.001), metachronous ovarian metastasis (HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.58–0.93; P = 0.012), size of KT (<5 cm) (HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.58–0.95; P = 0.019), ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) 0 to 1 (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.29–0.80; P = 0.004), tumor confined to ovary (HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.16–0.99; P = 0.047), and tumor confined to pelvic cavity (HR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.14–0.92; P = 0.033). Shorter OS was associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (HR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.25–3.21; P = 0.004), ascites (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.19–2.31; P = 0.003) and positive CEA (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.10–1.82; P = 0.007). Gastrectomy led to a slight improvement in OS, but without statistical significance (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.47–1.02; P = 0.061). No significant difference in OS was observed in patients with signet-ring cells (HR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.91–1.51; P = 0.226), bilateral ovarian metastasis (HR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.70–1.08; P = 0.212), age ≥ 50 years (HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.71–1.22; P = 0.619), positive CA19-9 (HR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.75–1.35; P = 0.960), and positive CA-125 (HR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.73–1.33; P = 0.915). Various factors affect OS in patients with KT.