Sequence comparison of aflR from different Aspergillus species provides evidence for variability in regulation of aflatoxin production

Aflatoxin contamination of foods and feeds is a world-wide agricultural problem. Aflatoxin production requires expression of the biosynthetic pathway regulatory gene, aflR, which encodes a Cys6Zn2-type DNA-binding protein. Homologs of aflR from Aspergillus nomius, bombycis, parasiticus, flavus, and pseudotamarii were compared to investigate the molecular basis for variation among aflatoxin-producing taxa in the regulation of aflatoxin production. Variability was found in putative promoter consensus elements and coding region motifs, including motifs involved in developmental regulation (AbaA, BrlA), regulation of nitrogen source utilization (AreA), and pH regulation (PacC), and in coding region PEST domains. Some of these elements may affect expression of aflJ, a gene divergently transcribed from aflR, that also is required for aflatoxin accumulation. Comparisons of phylogenetic trees obtained with either aligned aflR intergenic region sequence or coding region sequence and the observed divergence in regulatory features among the taxa provide evidence that regulatory signals for aflatoxin production evolved to respond to a variety of environmental stimuli under differential selective pressures. Phylogenetic analyses also suggest that isolates currently assigned to the A. flavus morphotype SBG represent a distinct species and that A. nomius is a diverse paraphyletic assemblage likely to contain several species.     

Elucidation of <Emphasis Type="Italic">veA</Emphasis>-dependent genes associated with aflatoxin and sclerotial production in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aspergillus flavus</Emphasis> by functional genomics

The aflatoxin-producing fungi, Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus, form structures called sclerotia that allow for survival under adverse conditions. Deletion of the veA gene in A. flavus and A. parasiticus blocks production of aflatoxin as well as sclerotial formation. We used microarray technology to identify genes differentially expressed in wild-type veA and veA mutant strains that could be involved in aflatoxin production and sclerotial development in A. flavus. The DNA microarray analysis revealed 684 genes whose expression changed significantly over time; 136 of these were differentially expressed between the two strains including 27 genes that demonstrated a significant difference in expression both between strains and over time. A group of 115 genes showed greater expression in the wild-type than in the veA mutant strain. We identified a subgroup of veA-dependent genes that exhibited time-dependent expression profiles similar to those of known aflatoxin biosynthetic genes or that were candidates for involvement in sclerotial production in the wild type.     

Alteration of Different Domains in AFLR Affects Aflatoxin Pathway Metabolism inAspergillus parasiticusTransformants

AFLR, a zinc binuclear cluster DNA-binding protein, is required for activation of genes comprising the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway inAspergillusspp. Transformation ofAspergillus parasiticuswith plasmids containing the intactaflRgene gave clones that produced fivefold more aflatoxin pathway metabolites than did the untransformed strain. When a 13-bp region in theaflRpromoter (positions −102 to −115 with respect to the ATG) was deleted, including a portion of a palindromic site previously shown to bind recombinant AFLR, metabolite production was 40% that of transformants with intactaflR.This result provides further evidence that this site may be involved in the autoregulation ofaflR.Overexpression of pathway genes could also result from increased quantities of AFLR titrating out a putative repressor protein. In AFLR, a 20-amino-acid acidic region near its carboxy-terminus resembles the region in yeast GAL4 required for GAL80 repressor binding. When 3 of the acidic amino acids in this region were deleted, levels of metabolites were even higher than those produced by transformants with intactaflR,as would be expected if repressor binding was suppressed in transformants containing this altered protein. Transformation with plasmids mutated at the AFLR zinc cluster (Cys to Trp at amino acid position 49) or at a putative nuclear localization signal region (RRARK deleted) gave clones with one-fifth the metabolite production of the untransformed fungus in spite of the transformants making the same or moreaflRmRNA. Since these transformants retained a copy of intactaflR,the latter results can be explained best by assuming that AFLR activates genes involved in aflatoxin production as a dimeric protein and that heterodimers containing both mutant and intact AFLR strands are inactive.     

Dothistroma pini,a forest pathogen,contains homologs of aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes

Homologs of aflatoxin biosynthetic genes have been identified in the pine needle pathogen Dothistroma pini. D. pini produces dothistromin, a difuranoanthraquinone toxin with structural similarity to the aflatoxin precursor versicolorin B. Previous studies with purified dothistromin suggest a possible role for this toxin in pathogenicity. By using an aflatoxin gene as a hybridization probe, a genomic D. pini clone was identified that contained four dot genes with similarity to genes in aflatoxin and sterigmatocystin gene clusters with predicted activities of a ketoreductase (dotA), oxidase (dotB), major facilitator superfamily transporter (dotC), and thioesterase (dotD). A D. pini dotA mutant was made by targeted gene replacement and shown to be severely impaired in dothistromin production, confirming that dotA is involved in dothistromin biosynthesis. Accumulation of versicolorin A (a precursor of aflatoxin) by the dotA mutant confirms that the dotA gene product is involved in an aflatoxin-like biosynthetic pathway. Since toxin genes have been found to be clustered in fungi in every case analyzed so far, it is speculated that the four dot genes may comprise part of a dothistromin biosynthetic gene cluster. A fifth gene, ddhA, is not a homolog of aflatoxin genes and could be at one end of the dothistromin cluster. These genes will allow comparative biochemical and genetic studies of the aflatoxin and dothistromin biosynthetic pathways and may also lead to new ways to control Dothistroma needle blight.     

Divergent regulation of aflatoxin production at acidic pH by two <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aspergillus</Emphasis> strains

Production of aflatoxins (AF) by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus is known to occur only at acidic pH. Although typical A. flavus isolates produced more AF as the external pH became increasingly acidic, an atypical strain from West Africa produced less. The lower AF production was not well correlated with decreases in expression of the aflatoxin pathway regulatory gene, aflR, or of two other biosynthesis genes.     

A multiplex RT-PCR approach to detect aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus

AIMS: To develop a multiplex reverse transciption-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) protocol to discriminate aflatoxin-producing from aflatoxin-nonproducing strains of Aspergillus flavus. METHODS AND RESULTS: The protocol was first optimized on a set of strains obtained from laboratory collections and then validated on A. flavus strains isolated from corn grains collected in the fields of the Po Valley (Italy). Five genes of the aflatoxin gene cluster of A. flavus, two regulatory (aflR and aflS) and three structural (aflD, aflO and aflQ), were targeted with specific primers to highlight their expression in mycelia cultivated under inducing conditions for aflatoxins production. 48-h-old cultures expressed the complete set of the genes analysed here whereas 24-h-old ones did not. Genomic PCR (quadruplex PCR) was also performed in parallel using chromosomal DNA extracted from the same set of strains to correlate the integrity of the genes with their expression. CONCLUSIONS: We show that a good correlation exists between gene expression of the aflatoxin genes, here analysed by multipex RT-PCR, and aflatoxin production, except for one strain that apparently transcribed all the relevant genes but did not produce aflatoxin in the medium. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first example of the application of a combination of multiplex PCR and RT-PCR approaches to screen a population of A. flavus for the presence of aflatoxigenic and nonaflatoxigenic strains. The proposed protocol will be helpful in evaluating the risk posed by A. flavus in natural environments and might also be a useful tool to monitor its presence during the processing steps of food and feed commodities.