血浆uPA、uPAR在乳腺癌分子亚型中的表达及临床意义

目的：探讨血浆uPA、uPAR在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中的表达水平及其对乳腺癌患者治疗、预后等的临床意义。方法：采用免疫组化ELISA方法测定的女性乳腺癌初治患者86例的血浆uPA、uPAR水平,所有患者均经组织病理学确诊,以患者的临床病理学资料提供的免疫组化结果为基础进行分子分型,结合二者进行分析。结果：血浆uPA在乳腺癌不同分子亚型中表达有统计学差异（P〈0．01）,uPAR在乳腺癌不同分子亚型中表达有统计学差异（P〈0．05）;乳腺癌患者血浆uPA和uPAR呈显著正相关（P〈0．01,Pearson相关系数（r=0．735）。结论：乳腺癌患者血浆uPA和uPAR的水平与分子亚型密切相关,他们和分子亚型联合,可能对乳腺癌个体化治疗及判定预后有指导意义。     

uPA、PAI-1 的表达和MVD 计数与浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性的关系

目的:探讨尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI-1)的表达和血管形成与浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性的关系。方法:应用免疫组化SP法检测80例浸润性乳腺癌、20例良性乳腺肿瘤组织中uPA、PAI-1的表达情况并进行微血管计数。结果:uPA和PAI-1在浸润性乳腺癌组的阳性表达显著高于良性肿瘤组,且其高表达率与乳腺癌的临床病理参数密切相关(P<0.05);微血管计数在乳腺癌组和良性肿瘤组分别为30.87±7.64、20.28±8.72,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.01)。uPA与PAI-1在浸润性乳腺癌中的表达呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论:uPA、PAI-1的高表达与浸润性乳腺癌的浸润、转移相关,uPA、PAI-1的高表达和MVD计数可作为评价浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性、评估预后和确定治疗方案的生物学指标。     

上皮性卵巢癌组织中uPA及uPAR的表达(英文)

目的:研究uPA和uPAR在卵巢癌中的表达,分析其与卵巢癌的发展和预后的关系。方法:采用免疫组织化学法检测60例上皮性卵巢癌、20例交界性卵巢肿瘤及20例良性卵巢肿瘤组织中uPA、uPAR及表达,并结合临床病理因素进行分析。结果:(1)uPA、uPAR、在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达率(75%,66.7%)明显高于交界性卵巢肿瘤(40%,30%)及良性卵巢肿瘤组织(30%,25%),差异均有统计学意义(uPAx2=22.078,P0.001;uPARx2=19.510,P0.05),而交界性卵巢肿瘤与良性卵巢肿瘤组织间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。(2)uPA、uPAR在恶性卵巢肿瘤中阳性表达率与手术病理分期、组织分级和有无淋巴结转移有关;晚期癌组阳性表达率高于早期癌组(uPAx2=14.400,P0.05;uPARx2=9.6,P=0.002);低分化癌组的阳性表达率高于中高分化癌(uPAx2=15.002,P0.05;uPARx2=36.906,P0.05);有淋巴结转移癌组阳性表达率高于无淋巴结转移癌组(uPAx2=13.333,P0.05;uPARx2=15.313,P0.05);差异均有统计学意义;但是与癌症病理类型、病人年龄、肿瘤大小无关。uPA与uPAR的表达存在正相关。结论:在uPA和uPAR可通过促进血管生成和降解细胞外基质(基质)和基底膜,在肿瘤的侵袭和转移中发挥重要作用。uPA及uPAR在上皮性卵巢癌组织中表达上调,支持这些因子在肿瘤浸润和转移中发挥重要作用,二者有可能作为预测上皮性卵巢癌预后的重要参考指标。     

S100A14在乳腺癌不同分子亚型中表达的临床病理研究

目的:探讨S100钙结合蛋白A14(S100A14)在乳腺癌不同分子亚型中的表达及临床病理意义,为确定新的分子分型标志物提供参考依据。方法:254例乳腺癌石蜡组织来源于2013年1月16日至2014年5月22日在中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院暨湖南省肿瘤医院进行乳腺癌根治术的患者。应用免疫组织化学方法检测S100A14在乳腺癌组织中的表达,分析其S100A14在不同分子亚型乳腺癌组织中表达及其与患者临床病理指标间的相关性,采用Kaplan-Meier法分析S100A14蛋白表达与乳腺癌患者预后的关系。结果:S100A14在ER+/PR+/HER2+型、ER+/PR+/HER2-型、ER-/PR-/HER2+型、ER-/PR-/HER2-型乳腺癌四种分子亚型中的阳性表达分别为38.5%、47.1%、75.5%、80.0%,以在ER-/PR-/HER2-型中表达最高,在ER+/PR+/HER2+型中表达最低,四组间的阳性表达比较差异有显著统计学意义(P0.01);S100A14的表达与乳腺癌患者术后肝转移呈正相关(r=0.134,P0.05),与ER、PR表达均呈负相关(r=-0.353,P0.01),而与ER+/PR+/HER2+型、ER+/PR+/HER2-型乳腺癌的临床病理特征无显著相关性(P0.05)。在ER-/PR-/HER2+型乳腺癌中,有腋窝淋巴结转移组患者的S100A14阳性表达率明显高于无腋窝淋巴结转移组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);在ER-/PR-/HER2-型中,S100A14表达与术后肺转移呈负相关(r=-0.272, P=0.044)。结论:S100A14在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中表达存在差异,其表达与不同分子类型乳腺癌转移或复发有关,可能作为乳腺癌分子分型的候选标记物。     

SHCBP1:乳腺癌治疗候选靶点和潜在预后标志物

探讨SHCBP1在乳腺癌及其不同亚型中的表达特征和预后价值。利用Oncomine, bc-GenExMiner v4.2, Kaplan-Meier plotter, GSE41994及STRING数据库分析乳腺癌病人SHCBP1的mRNA表达水平及其与乳腺癌患者生存率的相关性等。结果:(1)乳腺癌组织中SHCBP1的mRNA水平明显高于正常组织样本,但不同分子亚型的乳腺癌患者中SHCBP1的表达水平不同;(2)SHCBP1表达升高可导致Luminal A亚型更短的无转移生存期(Distant metastasis-free survival,DMFS)和无病生存期(Disease-free survival, DFS);(3)在雌激素受体阳性(ER+)、孕酮受体阳性(PR+)亚型、仅接受辅助化疗、仅接受辅助化疗的ER(+)与接受包括或排除内分泌治疗乳腺癌患者中,SHCBP1表达升高则无复发生存率(Relapse-free survival,RFS)显著缩短;(4)SHCBP1和CDC45 mRNA表达水平之间呈正相关,并可能与KIF23等10种蛋白相互作用。结论:SHCBP1是一种很有前景的乳腺癌预后指标和潜在的治疗靶点。     

SDF-1 在乳腺癌患者血清中表达水平及临床意义

目的:分析SDF-1在乳腺癌患者外周血中的表达水平,探讨其临床意义。方法:Elisa法检测乳腺癌患者术前及术后血清SDF-1水平,分析其与乳腺癌临床病理特征的关系。结果:乳腺癌患者术前(69例)血清SDF-1水平明显高于正常对照组(20例)(6406.7±1302.5 pg/m L vs 5217.4±1225.7 pg/m L),有明显统计学差异(P<0.01),发生远处转移的乳腺癌患者(11例)血清SDF-1水平明显高于未发生转移者(58例)(7656.4±784.1 pg/m L vs 6169.7±1364.6 pg/m L),差异具有明显统计学意义(P<0.01)。ER及Her-2表达阳性乳腺癌的患者SDF-1水平较ER及Her-2表达阴性者低,差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:SDF-1可能是预测乳腺癌发生及远处转移的重要标志物。     

uPA、PAI-1的表达和MVD计数与浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性的关系

目的：探讨尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂（uPA）、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂（PAI-1）的表达和血管形成与浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性的关系。方法：应用免疫组化SP法检测80例浸润性乳腺癌、20例良性乳腺肿瘤组织中uPA、PAI-1的表达情况并进行微血管计数。结果：uPA和PAI-1在浸润性乳腺癌组的阳性表达显著高于良性肿瘤组,且其高表达率与乳腺癌的临床病理参数密切相关（P〈0.05）;微血管计数在乳腺癌组和良性肿瘤组分别为30.87±7.64、20.28±8.72,两组比较有显著性差异（P〈0.01）。uPA与PAI-1在浸润性乳腺癌中的表达呈正相关（P〈0.05）。结论：uPA、PAI-1的高表达与浸润性乳腺癌的浸润、转移相关,uPA、PAI-1的高表达和MVD计数可作为评价浸润性乳腺癌侵袭性、评估预后和确定治疗方案的生物学指标。     

Caspase-7在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中的表达及临床病理意义

目的:探讨含半胱氨酸的天冬氨酸蛋白水解酶(cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinase,Caspase-7,CASP7)在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中的表达及临床病理意义。方法:应用免疫组织化学方法检测CASP7在254例乳腺癌组织中的表达,重点观察该蛋白在不同分子亚型乳腺癌组织中表达的差异及与临床病理指标间的相关性,Kaplan-Meier法分析该蛋白表达与乳腺癌患者预后之间的关系。结果:Caspase-7在ER+PR+HER2+、ER+PR+HER2-、ER-PR-HER2+、ER-PR-HER2-中阳性表达率分别为37.2%、60.3%、17.0%、40.0%,在ER+/PR+/HER2-型中表达最高,在ER-/PR-/HER2+型中表达低,四组总体表达差异具有统计学意义(P0.001)。与ER、PR表达(均为r=0.194,P=0.002)呈显著正相关,与HER2表达2(r=-0.224,P0.001)呈显著负相关。在ER-PR-HER2+型乳腺癌中,CASP7的表达与肿瘤大小呈负相关(P=0.028),且与术后纵膈转移和脑转移呈正相关(均为r=0.307,P=0.026)。CASP7的表达与乳腺癌患者生存无显著相关性。结论:CASP7在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中表达存在差异,并且可能作为乳腺癌分子分型和预后预测的候选标记物。     

急性脑梗死患者相关生化指标检测的临床意义

目的:探讨急性脑梗死(ACI)患者治疗前后Hcy、ET-1、hs-CRP、TXA2水平和凝血纤溶指标的变化及临床意义。方法:分别采用ELISA法、发色底物法、凝血酶法、放射免疫法和免疫透射比浊法对68例ACI患者治疗前后Hcy、ET-1、hs-CRP、TXA2和各凝血纤溶指标水平进行检测,并以30例正常健康人作为对照组。结果:①ACI患者治疗前血浆Hcy、ET-1和血清hs-CRP、TXA2含量高于对照组(P<0.01),经过治疗,含量均明显下降,其中血浆Hcy、ET-1恢复至正常水平,与对照组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)②轻、中、重型组间血浆ET-1和血清hs-CRP、TXA2含量逐渐增加,组间差异有显著性(P<0.01或0.05),而中重型患者血浆Hcy含量明显高于轻型患者(P<0.01)。③经过治疗,ACI患者血浆vWF、GMP-140、Fg和F1+2含量较治疗前显著下降,而血浆PS活性、PC活性与AT水平较治疗前明显上升(P<0.01),其中血浆PS和PC活性与对照组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④ACI患者血浆中tPA水平低于对照组,血浆PAI-1含量高于对照组(P<0.01)。治疗后血浆tPA增加,与对照组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PAI-1减少,但仍显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:检测急性脑梗死(ACI)患者Hcy、ET-1、hs-CRP、TXA2和凝血纤溶指标水平的变化对于指导用药、病情观察和预后评估均有重要的临床意义。     

乳腺癌中丝/ 苏氨酸蛋白激酶Plk1 mRNA 的表达及其预后价值

目的:检测乳腺癌细胞和组织中丝/苏氨酸蛋白激酶Plk1基因mRNA的表达情况并分析其预后价值。方法:应用半定量RT-PCR方法分析3株人乳腺癌细胞和1株正常乳腺上皮细胞中Plk1基因mRNA的表达水平。同时分析84例乳腺癌及对应的癌旁正常乳腺上皮组织中Plk1 mRNA的表达水平。统计学分析Plk1 mRNA表达水平与乳腺癌患者年龄、肿瘤大小、组织分化程度、淋巴结转移状况、TNM分期和雌激素受体(ER)等临床病理参数之间的关系,以及与预后之间的关系。结果:Plk1基因mRNA在乳腺癌细胞中的相对表达水平显著高于其在正常乳腺上皮细胞中的相对表达水平(P值均小于<0.05)。另外,Plk1 mRNA在乳腺癌组织中平均表达水平(0.88±0.18)显著高于其在癌旁正常乳腺上皮组织中平均表达水平(0.22±0.10;P<0.01)。统计学分析结果表明:Plk1 mRNA表达水平和乳腺癌患者的淋巴结转移状况及TNM分期密切相关(P=0.009或0.007)。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析结果表明:高Plk1 mRNA表达水平的乳腺癌患者的5年无疾病进展率及总体生存率均显著低于低Plk1 mRNA表达水平的乳腺癌患者(P=0.0026及0.0136)。COX模型的多因素预后分析结果表明:Plk1基因mRNA表达水平是乳腺癌患者的一个独立的预后因素(HR=4.764,95%CI:1.341~6.123,P=0.0025)。结论:Plk1在乳腺癌组织呈现高表达水平,其mRNA表达水平有望成为临床乳腺癌患者一个重要的预后判断分子指标。     

Urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase-specific surface receptor expression and matrix invasion by breast cancer cells requires constitutive p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase activity

Overexpression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) has been well documented in a wide variety of tumor cells. In breast cancer, expression of uPA/uPAR is essential for tumor cell invasion and metastasis. However, the mechanism responsible for uPA/uPAR expression in cancer cells remains unclear. In the studies reported here, we show that endogenous p38 MAPK activity correlates well with breast carcinoma cell invasiveness. Treatment of highly invasive BT549 cells with a specific p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 diminished both uPA/uPAR mRNA and protein expression and abrogated the ability of these cells to invade matrigel, suggesting that p38 MAPK signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of uPA/uPAR expression and breast cancer cell invasion. We also demonstrated that SB203580-induced reduction in uPA/uPAR mRNA expression resulted from the de- stabilization of uPA and uPAR mRNA. Finally, by selectively inhibiting p38alpha or p38beta MAPK isoforms, we demonstrate that p38alpha, rather than p38beta, MAPK activity is essential for uPA/uPAR expression. These studies suggest that p38alpha MAPK signaling pathway is important for the maintenance of breast cancer invasive phenotype by promoting the stabilities of uPA and uPAR mRNA.     

Down‐regulation of uPA and uPAR by 3,3′‐diindolylmethane contributes to the inhibition of cell growth and migration of breast cancer cells

3,3′‐Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a known anti‐tumor agent against breast and other cancers; however, its exact mechanism of action remains unclear. The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) system are involved in the degradation of basement membrane and extracellular matrix, leading to tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Since uPA‐uPAR system is highly activated in aggressive breast cancer, we hypothesized that the biological activity of B‐DIM could be mediated via inactivation of uPA‐uPAR system. We found that B‐DIM treatment as well as silencing of uPA‐uPAR led to the inhibition of cell growth and motility of MDA‐MB‐231 cells, which was in part due to inhibition of VEGF and MMP‐9. Moreover, silencing of uPA‐uPAR led to decreased sensitivity of these cells to B‐DIM indicating an important role of uPA‐uPAR in B‐DIM‐mediated inhibition of cell growth and migration. We also found similar effects of B‐DIM on MCF‐7, cells expressing low levels of uPA‐uPAR, which was due to direct down‐regulation of MMP‐9 and VEGF, independent of uPA‐uPAR system. Interestingly, over‐expression of uPA‐uPAR in MCF‐7 cells attenuated the inhibitory effects of B‐DIM. Our results, therefore, suggest that B‐DIM down‐regulates uPA‐uPAR in aggressive breast cancers but in the absence of uPA‐uPAR, B‐DIM can directly inhibit VEGF and MMP‐9 leading to the inhibition of cell growth and migration of breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 916–925, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The effects of vitronectin on specific interactions between urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its receptor: ab initio molecular orbital calculations

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR) on the surface of a cancer cell is considered to be a trigger for starting cancer invasions. In addition, the somatomedin B (SMB) domain of vitronectin binds simultaneously to uPAR to construct a ternary complex of uPAR–uPA–SMB. Here we present stable structures of the solvated complexes of uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB obtained by classical molecular mechanics simulations, and the specific interactions between uPAR, uPA and SMB are investigated by ab initio fragment molecular orbital calculations. The result indicates that the SMB binding enhances the binding affinity between uPAR and uPA, although there is no direct contact between SMB and uPA. In particular, the specific interaction between uPAR and the Lys36 residue of uPA is significantly affected by the SMB binding. The positively charged Lys23, Lys46 and Lys61 residues of uPA have strong attractive interactions to uPAR in both the uPAR–uPA and uPAR–uPA–SMB complexes, demonstrating the importance of these residues in the specific binding between uPAR and uPA. The current results on the specific interactions are informative for proposing potent antagonists, which block the uPA and SMB bindings to uPAR.     

The very low density lipoprotein receptor regulates urokinase receptor catabolism and breast cancer cell motility in vitro

The very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLr) binds diverse ligands, including urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and uPA-plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) complex. In this study, we characterized the effects of the VLDLr on the internalization, catabolism, and function of the uPA receptor (uPAR) in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells. When challenged with uPA.PAI-1 complex, MDA-MB-435 cells internalized uPAR; this process was inhibited by 80% when the activity of the VLDLr was neutralized with receptor-associated protein (RAP). To determine whether internalized uPAR is degraded, we studied the catabolism of [35S]methionine-labeled uPAR. In the absence of exogenous agents, the uPAR catabolism t(1)/(2) was 8.2 h. uPA.PAI-1 complex accelerated uPAR catabolism (t(1)/(2) to 1.8 h), while RAP inhibited uPAR catabolism in the presence (t(1)/(2) of 7.8 h) and absence (t(1)/(2) of 16.9 h) of uPA.PAI-1 complex, demonstrating a critical role for the VLDLr. When MCF-7 cells were cultured in RAP, cell surface uPAR levels increased gradually, reaching a new steady-state in 3 days. The amount of uPA which accumulated in the medium also increased. Culturing in RAP for 3 days increased MCF-7 cell motility by 2.2 +/- 0.1-fold and by 4.4 +/- 0.3-fold when 1.0 nM uPA was added. The effects of RAP on MCF-7 cell motility were entirely abrogated by an antibody which binds uPA and prevents uPA binding to uPAR. MCF-7 cells that were cultured in RAP demonstrated increased levels of activated mitogen-activated protein kinases. Furthermore, the MEK inhibitor, PD098059, decreased the motility of RAP-treated cells without affecting control cultures. These studies suggest a model in which the VLDLr regulates autocrine uPAR-initiated signaling and thereby regulates cellular motility.     

Sequences within domain II of the urokinase receptor critical for differential ligand recognition

The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays important roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes by virtue of its interactions with urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), vitronectin (Vn), and several other proteins. The uPA binding site spans all three domains (D1 to D3) of uPAR. However, the nature of the Vn binding site within uPAR is still not clear. In this study, we conducted homolog-scanning mutagenesis on uPAR by switching 14 individual segments of 4-8 residues to their counterpart sequences of a uPAR homolog CD59. All 14 mutants were well expressed, reacted with a panel of monoclonal antibodies, and exhibited correct molecular weights. Of these 14 mutants, six mutants were defective in both uPA and Vn binding. Most importantly, we found two unique mutants uPAR(Asn172-Lys175) and uPAR(Glu183-Asn186) within the D2 domain, which displayed differential ligand binding activity: both had high affinity uPA binding, but completely lost Vn binding, indicating that these two sequences constitute a novel Vn binding site. Indeed, two peptides, P1 (153CPGSNGFHNNDTFHFLKC) and P2 (171CNTTKCNEGPILELENLPQ), derived from the sequences of the identified uPA and Vn binding pockets within D2, respectively, behaved like bona fide ligand binding sites: peptide P1 bound uPA but not Vn, whereas peptide P2 bound Vn and inhibited uPAR-mediated cell adhesion, but did not interact with uPA. Altogether, our data demonstrated that uPAR D2 contains two distinct ligand binding sites for uPA and Vn. Such information will help us better understand the complex roles of uPAR in cell adhesion, migration, and tumor metastasis.