染色质蛋白激酶VRK1的生物学功能及其在癌症靶向治疗中的意义

牛痘相关激酶1(vaccinia-related kinase 1,VRK1)是一种核染色质丝苏氨酸蛋白激酶,在癌症中不发生基因突变,但在很多类型的肿瘤中表达上调并与不良预后相关。在细胞核内,VRK1可以磷酸化几种转录因子、组蛋白和涉及DNA损伤反应途径的蛋白质,还可以参与转录过程中组蛋白的乙酰化修饰,调节细胞周期、有丝分裂等过程促进细胞增殖,并且在DNA损伤修复中发挥至关重要的作用。在DNA损伤修复反应中,VRK1调控组蛋白乙酰化,介导DNA损伤反应的触发,进一步参与非同源末端连接DNA修复途径,还可以调控p53相关的DNA损伤修复过程。基于VRK1的以上生物学功能,癌组织中VRK1的高表达可以促进肿瘤细胞增殖、转移以及参与肿瘤细胞DNA修复过程。在癌症靶向治疗研究中,VRK1可以作为癌症合成致死性策略的选择靶点用于多种癌症的防治。     

DNA切除修复与转录偶联

细胞DNA受到某些环境理化因子损伤后,其中活性转录基因和DNA转录链上的损伤被优先切除修复,这种DNA选择性修复直接与基因转录过程偶联．在大肠杆菌中已分离到实现此功能的转录修复偶联因子（TRCF）,是由mdf基因编码的一种具有ATPase活性的DNA结合蛋白．在真核细胞中,发现某些DNA修复蛋白也在DNA转录中起作用,如人DNA切除修复基因ERCG－3编码产物,是转录因子TFⅡH中最大亚基p89,酵母切除修复基因RAD3就是编码因子b的最大亚基p85．     

乙酰转移酶Tip60在转录调控及DNA损伤应答中作用的研究进展

Tip60(Tat-interactive protein)是进化上极为保守的乙酰转移酶,它在细胞周期阻滞、凋亡、DNA损伤修复等众多生理学过程中都发挥着重要的作用.作为许多转录因子的共调节因子,Tip60既可以激活也可以抑制特定基因的转录.当发生DNA损伤时,它被招募到损伤位点,参与DNA损伤应答的感受、信号转导和修复过程中.除此之外,Tip60还与许多病理过程有关,尤其是在肿瘤发生中起着关键作用.     

p53基因与DNA修复

DNA的损伤修复是一个多因子参与的、多环节的复杂修复系统。p53基因以多条信号通路,多种调控方式参与DNA修复。它可以通过其下游一系列靶基因p21、gadd45等调控细胞周期,使细胞停滞于G1期、G2期等检测点,从而使受损DNA有足够的时间进行多因子参与的修复过程;也可以与DNA修复因子PRSA、PCNA、XPp48基因等相互作用,直接参与DNA修复;还可以蛋白－蛋白相互作用参与DNA修复。     

乳腺癌易感蛋白1在DNA损伤修复中的作用

人类乳腺癌易感基因1(breast cancer susceptibility gene 1,BRCA1)首先是在乳腺癌家族中发现的,是具有遗传倾向的乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感基因,其基因的突变与家族性乳腺癌及卵巢癌的发生有密切联系。BRCA1是一种抑癌基因,其基因产物可以参与维持基因组稳定性的多条细胞信号通路,例如DNA损伤诱导的细胞周期调控、DNA损伤修复、基因转录调节、细胞凋亡、泛素化等重要的细胞活动。本文就近几年来BRCA1在DNA损伤修复中的作用的研究进展作一综述,包括DNA损伤诱导的细胞周期检查点的激活和DNA损伤修复两方面。     

DNA损伤检验点与损伤修复及基因组稳定性

生物有机体基因组DNA经常会受到内源或外源因素的影响而导致结构发生变化,产生损伤;在长期进化过程中,有机体也相应形成了一系列应对与修复损伤DNA,并维持染色体基因组正常结构功能的机制。其中DNA损伤检验点（DNA damage checkpoint）就是在感应DNA损伤的基础上,对损伤感应信号进行转导,或引起细胞周期的暂停,从而使细胞有足够的时间对损伤DNA进行修复,或最终导致细胞发生凋亡。DNA损伤检验点信号转导途径是一个高度保守的信号感应过程,整个途径大致可以分为损伤感应、信号传递及信号效应3个组成部分。其中3-磷脂酰肌醇激酶家族类成员ATM（ataxia-telangiectasia mutated）和ATR（ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related）活性的增加构成整个途径活化的第一步。它们通过激活下游的效应激酶,Chk2／Chk1,通过协同作用许多其他调控细胞周期、DNA复制、DNA损伤修复及细胞凋亡等过程的蛋白质因子来实现细胞对DNA损伤的高度协调反应。近十几年,随着此领域研究的不断深入,人们逐步揭示了DNA损伤检验点途径发生过程中,各种核心组分通过与不同调节因子、效应因子及DNA损伤修复蛋白间的复杂相互作用,以实现监测感应异常DNA结构并实施相应反应的机制;其中,检验点衔接因子（mediators）及染色质结构,尤其是核小体组蛋白的共价修饰在调控ATM／ATR活性,促进ATM／ATR与底物间的相互作用以及介导DNA损伤位点周围染色质区域上多蛋白复合物在时间与空间上的动态形成发挥着重要的作用。同时,人们也开始发现DNA损伤检验点途径与DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性以及肿瘤发生等过程之间某些内在的联系。该反应途径在通过协调细胞针对DNA损伤做出各种反应的基础上,直接或间接地参与或调控DNA损伤修复过程,并与DNA损伤修复途径协同作用最终保证染色体基凶组结构的完整性,而检验点途径的改变,则会引起基因组不稳定的发生,包括从突变频率的提高到大范围的染色体重排,以及染色体数量的畸变。如：突变发生在肿瘤形成早期,会大大增加肿瘤发生的几率。文章将对DNA损伤检验点途径机制及其对DNA损伤修复、基因组稳定性影响的最新进展进行综述。     

细胞周期监控点蛋白Rad9与非同源末端连接修复蛋白Ku70的相互作用研究

Rad9是一种重要的细胞周期监控点调控蛋白．越来越多的证据显示,Rad9也可与多种DNA损伤修复通路中的蛋白质相互作用,并调节其功能,在DNA损伤修复中发挥重要作用．非同源末端连接修复是DNA双链断裂的一条重要修复途径．Ku70、Ku80和DNA依赖的蛋白激酶催化亚基(DNA-PKcs)共同组成DNA依赖的蛋白激酶复合物(DNA-PK),在非同源末端修复连接中起重要作用．本研究中,检测到Rad9与Ku70有直接的物理相互作用和功能相互作用．我们在不同的细胞模型中发现,Rad9基因敲除、Rad9蛋白去除或Rad9表达降低会导致非同源末端连接效率明显下降．已有的研究表明,DNA损伤可导致细胞中Ku70与染色质结合增加及DNA-PKcs激酶活性增强．我们的结果显示,与野生小鼠细胞相比,Rad9基因敲除的小鼠细胞中, DNA损伤诱导的上述效应均减弱．综上所述,我们的研究首次报道了Rad9与非同源末端连接修复蛋白Ku70间有相互作用,并提示Rad9可通过调节Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs复合物功能参与非同源末端连接修复．     

染色质改构因子BRG1降低UV照射引起的细胞凋亡

生命体的遗传物质基础是DNA分子,多种因素可以作用于细胞内的DNA分子,导致多种类型的DNA损伤。若受损的DNA得不到及时和有效的修复,细胞将走向凋亡或发生变异。染色质改构复合物(chromatin remodeling complex)在基因表达调控和DNA复制等方面扮演着重要角色。依赖ATP的染色质改构复合物SWI/SNF的核心亚基Brahma Related Gene1(BRG1)在染色质结构调整和基因转录调控等多个细胞进程中具有重要作用,仅有有限的文献报道BRG1参与到DNA的损伤修复过程。因此,进一步研究与验证BRG1在调控DNA的损伤修复进而挽救细胞凋亡中的作用十分重要。本文通过利用不同强度的UV照射检测细胞凋亡的情况,初步建立了DNA损伤修复的实验体系。将BRG1表达质粒瞬时转染到SW13(BRG1-/-)细胞系中,并利用30J/m2的UV照射,分别在0h、6h和24h检测细胞早期凋亡程度。结果表明,SW13(BRG1-/-)细胞中瞬时表达BRG1可以明显降低由UV照射引起的细胞凋亡,其中UV照射后24h的细胞表现最明显。我们进一步在HeLa细胞中通过瞬时表达BRG1验证了上述结果。由于BRG1通过染色质改构在基因的转录调控、复制和重组等方面起着重要的作用,我们推测BRG1可能通过染色质改构参与了DNA的损伤修复过程,进而影响了细胞凋亡。     

自噬与DNA损伤修复及其对肿瘤的影响

DNA损伤与肿瘤的发生发展密切相关。当DNA损伤发生时,会触发一系列的损伤应答反应以帮助细胞生存,其中即包括对自噬的诱导。ATM、P53和PARP1等多种参与DNA损伤修复的效应因子通过影响AMPK、mTOR以及一些凋亡蛋白等启动自噬。而作为一种降解途径,自噬则可通过调节DNA修复相关蛋白的水平直接影响同源重组修复、非同源末端连接修复和核苷酸切除修复等促进DNA修复,以及通过维持细胞内稳态间接促进DNA修复,从而在正常细胞的恶性转化和肿瘤耐药等发生机制中扮演重要角色。此外,DNA修复失败时,自噬也可作为一种肿瘤细胞的程序性死亡方式。因此研究自噬通过调节DNA损伤修复而对肿瘤的影响对于理解肿瘤发生的机制和提供治疗思路都有重要意义。     

DNA修复的表观遗传学调控

表观遗传学信息的改变是导致人类肿瘤形成的重要因素之一．基因组的稳定性经常会受到DNA损伤的威胁．然而,高度致密的染色质结构却极大地妨碍了DNA修复的进行．因此,真核生物细胞中必须有一个精确的机制来克服染色质这一天然的屏障．其中,组蛋白的共价修饰和ATP-依赖的染色质重塑通过改变染色质的结构,对DNA修复进程起着关键的调控作用．介绍了DNA修复过程中,发生在表观遗传学方面的主要调控过程,特别阐述了在DNA双链断裂损伤应答和修复过程中,组蛋白修饰和染色质重塑方面最新的研究进展,并对今后的发展方向进行了讨论．     

DNA Damage Checkpoint, Damage Repair, and Genome Stability

Genomic DNA is under constant attack from both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damaging agents. Without proper care, the ensuing DNA damages would lead to alteration of genomic structure thus affecting the faithful transmission of genetic information. During the process of evolution, organisms have acquired a series of mechanisms responding to and repairing DNA damage, thus assuring the maintenance of genome stability and faithful transmission of genetic information. DNA damage checkpoint is one such important mechanism by which, in the face of DNA damage, a cell can respond to amplified damage signals, either by actively halting the cell cycle until it ensures that critical processes such as DNA replication or mitosis are complete or by initiating apoptosis as a last resort. Over the last decade, complex hierarchical interactions between the key components like ATM/ATR in the checkpoint pathway and various other mediators, effectors including DNA damage repair proteins have begun to emerge. In the meantime, an intimate relationship between mechanisms of damage checkpoint pathway, DNA damage repair, and genome stability was also uncovered. Reviewed hereinare the recent findings on both the mechanisms of activation of checkpoint pathways and their coordination with DNA damage repair machinery as well as their effect on genomic integrity.     

Simulated microgravity decreases DNA repair capacity and induces DNA damage in human lymphocytes

The effect of simulated microgravity on DNA damage and apoptosis is still controversial. The objective of this study was to test whether simulated microgravity conditions affect the expression of genes for DNA repair and apoptosis. To achieve this objective, human lymphocyte cells were grown in a NASA‐developed rotating wall vessel (RWV) bioreactor that simulates microgravity. The same cell line was grown in parallel under normal gravitational conditions in culture flasks. The effect of microgravity on the expression of genes was measured by quantitative real‐time PCR while DNA damage was examined by comet assay. The result of this study revealed that exposure to simulated microgravity condition decreases the expression of DNA repair genes. Mismatch repair (MMR) class of DNA repair pathway were more susceptible to microgravity condition‐induced gene expression changes than base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) class of DNA repair genes. Downregulation of genes involved in cell proliferation (CyclinD1 and PCNA) and apoptosis (Bax) was also observed. Microgravity‐induced changes in the expression of some of these genes were further verified at the protein level by Western blot analysis. The findings of this study suggest that microgravity may induce alterations in the expression of these DNA repair genes resulting in accumulation of DNA damage. Reduced expression of cell‐cycle genes suggests that microgravity may cause a reduction in cell growth. Downregulation of pro‐apoptotic genes further suggests that extended exposure to microgravity may result in a reduction in the cells' ability to undergo apoptosis. Any resistance to apoptosis seen in cells with damaged DNA may eventually lead to malignant transformation of those cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 107: 723–731, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint defects as drivers and therapeutic targets in melanoma

The ultraviolet radiation (UVR) component of sunlight is the major environmental risk factor for melanoma, producing DNA lesions that can be mutagenic if not repaired. The high level of mutations in melanomas that have the signature of UVR‐induced damage indicates that the normal mechanisms that detect and repair this damage must be defective in this system. With the exception of melanoma‐prone heritable syndromes which have mutations of repair genes, there is little evidence for somatic mutation of known repair genes. Cell cycle checkpoint controls are tightly associated with repair mechanisms, arresting cells to allow for repair before continuing through the cell cycle. Checkpoint signaling components also regulate the repair mechanisms. Defects in checkpoint mechanisms have been identified in melanomas and are likely to be responsible for increased mutation load in melanoma. Loss of the checkpoint responses may also provide an opportunity to target melanomas using a synthetic lethal approach to identify and inhibit mechanisms that compensate for the defective checkpoints.     

Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Malfunction of enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species leads to oxidative attack on biomolecules including DNA and consequently activates various DNA repair pathways. The nature of DNA damage and the cell cycle stage at which DNA damage occurs determine the appropriate repair pathway to rectify the damage. Oxidized DNA bases are primarily repaired by base excision repair and nucleotide incision repair. Nucleotide excision repair acts on lesions that distort DNA helix, mismatch repair on mispaired bases, and homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining on double stranded breaks. Post-replication repair that overcomes replication blocks caused by DNA damage also plays a crucial role in protecting the cell from the deleterious effects of oxidative DNA damage. Mitochondrial DNA is also prone to oxidative damage and is efficiently repaired by the cellular DNA repair machinery. In this review, we discuss the DNA repair pathways in relation to the nature of oxidative DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

DNA damage and repair in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa cells

Helicobacter pylori is a common human pathogen and its infection is believed to contribute to gastric cancer. Impaired DNA repair may fuel up cancer transformation by the accumulation of mutation and increased susceptibility to exogenous carcinogens. To evaluate the role of infection of H. pylori in DNA damage and repair we determined: (1) the level of endogenous basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage, and (2) the efficacy of removal of DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide and the antibiotic amoxicillin in the H. pylori-infected and non-infected GMCs. DNA damage and the efficacy of DNA repair were evaluated by the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Specific damage to the DNA bases were assayed with the DNA repair enzymes formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) recognizing oxidized DNA bases and 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) recognizing alkylated bases. The level of basal and oxidative DNA in the infected GMCs was higher than non-infected cells. H. pylori-infected GMCs displayed enhanced susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide than control cells. There was no difference between the efficacy of DNA repair in the infected and non-infected cells after treatment with hydrogen peroxide and amoxicillin. Our results indicate that H. pylori infection may be correlated with oxidative DNA damage in GMCs. Therefore, these features can be considered as a risk marker for gastric cancer associated with H. pylori infection and the comet assay may be applied to evaluate this marker.     

DNA Damage Checkpoints and Cancer

DNA damage checkpoint is one of the surveillance systems to maintain genomic integrity. Checkpoint systems sense the DNA damage and execute cell cycle arrest through inhibiting the activity of cell cycle regulators. This pathway is essential for the maintenance of genome stability and prevention of tumor development. Recent studies have showed that the cellular responses towards DNA damage, such as cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, and apoptosis are well coordinated. Here we describe the molecular mechanisms of checkpoint activation in response to DNA damage and the correlation between checkpoint gene mutation and genomic instability.