Cyanobacterial inoculation and nitrogen fertilization in rice

During three rice-growing seasons in Uruguay, field experiments were conducted to study the contribution of cyanobacterial inoculation and chemical N fertilization to rice production. Neither grain yield nor fertilizer recovery by the plant were affected by inoculation with native cyanobacterial isolates. A low fertilizer use efficiency (around 20%) was observed when labelled (NH₄)₂SO₄ was applied at sowing. Recovery of applied ¹⁵N by the soil–plant system was 50%. Inoculation did not modify ¹⁵N uptake by the plant when the fertilizer was three-split applied either. The total N-fertilizer recovery was higher when the fertilizer was split than when applied in a single dose. Plant N-fertilizer uptake was higher when the fertilizer was applied at tillering. Uptake of ¹⁵N from cyanobacteria by rice was studied in a greenhouse pots experiment without chemical nitrogen addition. Recovery of ¹⁵N from labelled cyanobacteria by rice in greenhouse growth conditions was similar to that of partial recovery of (NH₄)₂SO₄ applied at sowing in the field. Cyanobacterial N mineralization under controlled conditions was fast as cyanobacterial N was detected in plants after 25 days. Moreover 40 days after inoculation non-planted and inoculated soil had more inorganic N than the non-inoculated one.     

The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

Labelled urea or ammonium nitrate was applied to winter wheat growing on a loamy soil in Northern France. Two applications of fertilizer were given: 50 kg N ha^–1 at tillering (early March) and 110 kg N ha^–1 at the beginning of stem elongation (mid-April). The kinetics of urea hydrolysis, nitrification of ammonium and the disappearance of inorganic nitrogen were followed at frequent intervals. Inorganic nitrogen soon disappeared, mainly immobilized by soil microflora and absorbed by the crop. Net immobilization of fertilizer N occured at a very similar rate for urea and ammonium nitrate. Maximum immobilization (16 kg N ha¹) was found at harvest for the first dressing and at anthesis for the second dressing (23 kg N ha¹). During the nitrification period, the labelled ammonium pool was immobilized two to three times faster than the labelled nitrate pool. No significant net¹⁵N remineralization was found during the growth cycle.The actual denitrification and volatilization losses were probably more important than indicated from calculations made by extrapolation of fluxes measured over short intervals. However microbial immobilization was the most important of the processes which compete with plant uptake for nitrogen.     

Nitrogen assimilation in field-grown winter wheat: Direct measurements of nitrate reduction in roots using15N

Summary Nitrate fertiliser labelled with¹⁵N was applied to a field grown crop of winter wheat. Uptake and assimilation of fertiliser nitrate was studied by monitoring the appearance of labelled nitrate and labelled amino acids in the xylem sap. Shortly after applying¹⁵N-nitrate to the soil about 30 per cent of recently absorbed¹⁵N was in the reduced form, indicating that roots of cereal crops can make a substantial contribution in reducing nitrate. Seasonal changes in crop growth andin vivo NRA are also described.     

Transformation of15N-labelled urea and its modified forms in tropical wetland rice culture

Summary The fate of 100 kg N ha^–1 applied as¹⁵N-urea and its modified forms was followed in 4 successive field-grown wetland rice crops in a vertisol. The first wet season crop recovered about 27 to 36.6% of the applied N depending upon the N source. In subsequent seasons the average uptake was very small and it gradually decreased from 1.4 to 0.5 kg N ha^–1 although about 18 to 20, 12 to 17 and 14 to 18 kg ha^–1 residual fertilizer N was available in the root zone after harvest of first, second and third crops, respectively. The average uptake of the residual fertilizer N was only 7.6% in the second crop and it decreased to 4.5% in the third and to 3.2% in the fourth crop although all these crops were adequately fertilized with unlabelled urea. The basal application of neem coated urea was more effective in controlling the leaching loss of labelled NH₄+NO₃–N than split application of uncoated urea. In the first 3 seasons in which¹⁵N was detectable, the loss of fertilizer N through leaching as NH₄+NO₃–N amounted to 0.5 kg ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 1.5 kg from split urea and 4.1 kg from coal tar-coated urea. At the end of 4 crops, most of the labelled fertilizer N (about 69% on average) was located in the upper 0–20 cm soil layer showing very little movement beyond this depth. In the profile sampled upto 60 cm depth, totally about 13.8 kg labelled fertilizer N ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 12.7 kg from coal-tar coated urea, and 11.8 kg from split urea were recovered. The average recovery of labelled urea-N in crops and soil during the entire experimental period ranged between 42 and 51%. After correcting for leaching losses, the remaining 47 to 56% appeared to have been lost through ammonia volatilization and denitrification.     

Transformation of15N-labelled urea in rice-wheat cropping system

Summary In a udic chromusterts the transformation of an initial application of¹⁵N-urea @ 80 kg N ha^–1 to rice (Oryza sativa L.) in rice-wheat (R-W) and to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in wheat-rice (W-R) rotations was followed in 6 successive crops in each rotation. All rice crops were grown in irrigated wetland and wheat in irrigated upland conditions.The first wheat crop in W-R rotation utilized 22 kg fertilizer N ha^–1 as compared to 19 kg by the corresponding rice crop in R-W rotation. But the latter absorbed more soil N than the former. About 69% of the total N uptake in rice was derived from mineralization of soil organic N as compared to 61% in wheat.The succeeding wheat crop in R-W rotation utilized 6.7% of the residual fertilizer N in the soil but the corresponding rice crop in W-R rotation only 2.2%. The higher utilization appeared to be related to a greater incorporation of labelled fertilizer N in mineral and hexosamine fractions of the soil N. After the second crop in each rotation, the average residual fertilizer N utilization in the next 4 crops ranged between 3 and 4%.The total recovery of¹⁵N-urea in all crops amounted to 21.7 and 24.3 kg N ha^–1 in R-W and W-R rotation, respectively. At the end of the experiment, about 9 to 10 kg ha^–1 of the applied labelled N was found in soil upto 60 cm depth. Most of the labelled soil N (69–76%) was located in the upper 0–20 cm soil layer indicating little movement to lower depths despite intensive cropping for 4 years.     

Fertilizer vs. organic matter contributions to nitrogen leaching in cropping systems of the Pampas: 15N application in field lysimeters

Nitrogen (N) export from soils to streams and groundwater under the intensifying cropping schemes of the Pampas is modest compared to intensively cultivated basins of Europe and North America; however, a slow N enrichment of water resources has been suggested. We (1) analyzed the fate of fertilizer N and (2) evaluated the contribution of fertilizer and soil organic matter (SOM) to N leaching under the typical cropping conditions of the Pampas. Fertilizer N was applied as ¹⁵N-labeled ammonium sulfate to corn (in a corn/soybean rotation) sown under zero tillage in filled-in lysimeters containing two soils of different texture representative of the Pampean region (52 and 78 kg N ha^-1, added to the silt loam and sandy loam soil, respectively). Total fertilizer recovery at corn harvest averaged 84 and 64% for the silt loam and sandy loam lysimeters, respectively. Most fertilizer N was removed with plant biomass (39%) or remained immobilized in the soil (29 and 15%, for the silt loam and sandy loam soil, respectively) whereas its loss through drainage was negligible (<0.01%). We presume that the unaccounted fertilizer N losses were related to volatilization and denitrification. Throughout the corn growing season, subsequent fallow and soybean crop, which took place during an exceptionally dry period, the fertilizer N immobilized in the organic pool remained stable, and N leaching was scarce (7.5 kg N ha^-1), similar at both soils, and had a low contribution of fertilizer N (0–3.5%), implying that >96% of the leached N was derived from SOM mineralization. The inherent high SOM of Pampean soils and the favorable climatic conditions are likely to propitiate year-round production of nitrate, favoring its participation in crop nutrition and leaching. The presence of ¹⁵N in drainage water, however, suggests that fertilizer N leaching could become significant in situations with higher fertilization rates or more rainy seasons.     

The fate of residual 15N-labelled fertilizer in arable soils: its availability to subsequent crops and retention in soil

An earlier paper (Macdonald et al., 1997; J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 129, 125) presented data from a series of field experiments in which ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizers were applied in spring to winter wheat, winter oilseed rape, potatoes, sugar beet and spring beans grown on four different soils in SE England. Part of this N was retained in the soil and some remained in crop residues on the soil surface when the crop was harvested. In all cases the majority of this labelled N remained in organic form. In the present paper we describe experiments designed to follow the fate of this `residual' <sup>15</sup>N over the next 2 years (termed the first and second residual years) and measure its value to subsequent cereal crops. Averaging over all of the initial crops and soils, 6.3% of this `residual' ¹⁵N was taken up during the first residual year when the following crop was winter wheat and significantly less (5.5%) if it was spring barley. In the second year after the original application, a further 2.1% was recovered, this time by winter barley. Labelled N remaining after potatoes and sugar beet was more available to the first residual crop than that remaining after oilseed rape or winter wheat. By the second residual year, this difference had almost disappeared. The availability to subsequent crops of the labelled N remaining in or on the soil at harvest of the application year decreased in the order: silty clay loam>sandy loam>chalky loam>heavy clay. In most cases, only a small proportion of the residual fertilizer N available for plant uptake was recovered by the subsequent crop, indicating poor synchrony between the mineralization of ¹⁵N-labelled organic residues and crop N uptake. Averaging over all soils and crops, 22% of the labelled N applied as fertilizer was lost (i.e., unaccounted for in harvested crop and soil to a depth of 100 cm) by harvest in the year of application, rising to 34% at harvest of the first residual year and to 35% in the second residual year. In the first residual year, losses of labelled N were much greater after spring beans than after any of the other crops.     

Turnover of15N-labelled urea in various rotations of groundnut sorghum and pigeon pea crops

Summary A field experiment on N turnover in rotations of groundnut, sorghum and pigeonpea crops was conducted in an Indian Alfisol during 1978–80.¹⁵N-labelled urea N was applied @ 40 kg ha^–1 in 1978. In the first year, the groundnut utilized 19.5% of the applied labelled N, sorghum 25.5%, and pigeon pea 10.3%. More fertilizer N was removed through weeding than by crop uptake in sorghum and pigeon pea. The fertilizer N left behind in soil upto 40 cm depth was 44.4% in groundnut plots, 35.1% in sorghum plots and 40.1% in pigeon pea plots.The uptake in 1979 of the residual fertilizer N in the soil was 8.9% in sorghum, 8.3% in groundnut and 2.8% in pigeon pea. In 1980, it declined to less than 2% for pigeon pea and groundnut and to about 4% for sorghum.A balance sheet drawn at the end of each rotation showed that about 51.3% of the applied labelled N was accounted for in groundnut-sorghum-pigeon pea rotation, 70.9% in sorghumpigeon pea-groundnut, and 43.5% in pigeon pea-groundnut-sorghum.     

Fate of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to spring barley grown on soils of contrasting nutrient status

An experiment with ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was superimposed on the Rothamsted Hoosfield Spring Barley Experiment, started in 1852. Labelled ¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ was applied in spring at (nominal) rates of 0, 48, 96 and 144 kg N ha^-1. The labelled fertilizer was applied to microplots located within four treatments of the original experiment: that receiving farmyard manure (FYM) annually, that receiving inorganic nutrients (PK) annually and to two that were deficient in nutrients: applications were made in two successive years, but to different areas within these original treatments. Maximum yields in 1986 (7.1 t grain ha^-1) were a little greater than in 1987. In 1987, microplots on the FYM and PK treatments gave similar yields, provided enough fertilizer N was applied, but in 1986 yields on the PK treatment were always less than those on the FYM treatment, no matter how much fertilizer N was applied. In plots with adequate crop nutrients, about 51% of the labelled N was present in above-ground crop and weed at harvest, about 30% remained in the top 70 cm of soil (mostly in the 0–23 cm layer) and about 19% was unaccounted for, all irrespective of the rate of N application and of the quantity of inorganic N in the soil at the time of application. Less than 4% of the added fertilizer N was present in inorganic form in the soil at harvest, confirming results from comparable experiments with autumn-sown cereals in south-east England. Thus, in this experiment there is no evidence that a spring-sown cereal is more likely to leave unused fertilizer in the soil than an autumn-sown one. With trace applications (ca. 2 kg N ha^-1) more labelled N was retained in the soil and less was in the above-ground crop. Where P and K were deficient, yields were depressed, a smaller proportion of the labelled fertilizer N was present in the above-ground crop at harvest and more remained in the soil.Although the percentage uptake of labelled N was similar across the range of fertilizer N applications, the uptake of total N fell off at the higher N rates, particularly on the FYM treatment. This was reflected in the appearance of a negative Added Nitrogen Interaction (ANI) at the highest rate of application. Fertilizer N blocked the uptake of soil N, particularly from below 23 cm, once the capacity of the crop to take up N was exceeded. Denitrification and leaching were almost certainly insufficient to account for the 19% loss of spring-added N across the whole range of N applications and other loss processes must also have contributed.     

Nitrogen uptake and recovery from urea and green manure in lowland rice measured by15N and non-isotope techniques

In the recent past considerable attention is paid to minimize dependence on purchased inputs such as inorganic nitrogen fertilizer. Green manure in the form of flood-tolerant, stem-nodulatingSesbania rostrata andAeschynomene afraspera is an alternative N source for rice, which may also increase N use efficiency. Therefore research was conducted to determine the fate of N applied to lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the form ofSesbania rostrata andAeschynomene afraspera green manure and urea in two field experiments using¹⁵N labeled materials.¹⁵N in the soil and rice plant was determined, and¹⁵N balances established. Apparent N recoveries were determined by non-tracer method. ¹⁵N recoveries averaged 90 and 65% of N applied for green manure and urea treatments, respectively. High partial pressures of NH₃ in the floodwater, and high pH probably resulted from urea application and favoured losses of N from the urea treatment. Results show that green manure N can supply a substantial proportion of the N requirements of lowland rice. Nitrogen released fromSesbania rostrata andAeschynomene afraspera green manure was in synchrony with the demand of the rice plant. The effect of combined application of green manure and urea on N losses from urea fertilizer were also investigated. Green manure reduced the N losses from¹⁵N labeled urea possibly due to a reduction in pH of the floodwater. Positive added N interactions (ANIs) were observed. At harvest, an average of 45 and 25% of N applied remained in the soil for green manure and urea, respectively.Contribution from IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines and Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, GermanyContribution from IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines and Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany     

Transformation of soil and fertilizer nitrogen in paddy soil and their availability to rice plants

Summary A pot experiment in the field showed that addition of ammonium sulfate increased the uptake of soil nitrogen. A-value was found to be independent of the rate of nitrogen application. The rice plant took up about 13 percent of the nitrogen in rice straw which was incorporated into the soil when nitrogen fertilizer was not added, and about 15 percent when 50 ppm N was added. Addition of different levels of fertilizer did not affect the release of immobilized fertilizer nitrogen. Recovery of fertilizer by the rice plant was low when nitrogen was added as basal (broadcast). Recovery was improved by incorporating fertilizer nitrogen before transplanting. Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen when topdressed at reproductive stages was much higher than when applied as basal. A fairly large portion of fertilizer nitrogen was immobilized into the soil. Availability of immobilized nitrogen in the soil appeared low. re]19751117     

Effects of field fertilizer practices on labeled ammonium-nitrogen transformations and its utilization by winter wheat

Summary Field experiments with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were conducted in two years at two locations using¹⁵N-enriched (NH₄)₂SO₄ on Smolan silt loam (Pachic Argiustoll) and Ost loam (Typic Arguistoll) soils. The objective was to relate differences in crop utilization of fertilizer to movement and transformations of the N in a complete factorial experiment having fall and spring applications, banded and broadcast, with and without nitrapyrin. Plant uptake of the 60 kg N/ha applied varied from 31% to 62% with greatest uptake when fertilizer was banded in the spring without nitrapyrin and least uptake from fall and spring broadcast treatments using nitrapyrin. Analysis of single factor effects showed greater crop contents of fertilizer N for spring than fall applications. That was related to immobilization of the applied N. Much more fertilizer N was in inorganic forms during the period of rapid wheat growth with spring applications than with fall. Banding the fertilizer at a depth of 0.05 m resulted in greater plant uptake than broadcasting or banding it on the soil surface. A significant portion of the applied N was immobilized near the point of application. That limited the downward movement of the N placed on the surface, making it less available to plant roots than the N placed 0.05 m deep where soil moisture was more favorable. Use of nitrapyrin resulted in lowered amounts of fertilizer N as NO₃-until mid-May for fall treatments and until harvest with spring treatments. That appeared to be the reason for lowered plant uptake when nitrapyrin was used. Published in memory of Professor R V Olson and over 40 years of contributions and service to agriculture and soil science (1919–1985).     

Estimation of symbiotically fixed nitrogen in field grown soybeans: An application of natural15N/14N abundance and a low level15N-tracer technique

Summary Plants from agricultural and natural upland ecosystem were investigated for¹⁵N content to evaluate the role of symbiotic N₂-fixation in the nitrogen nutrition of soybean. Increased yields and lower δ¹⁵N values of nodulating soybeansvs, non-nodulating isolines gave semi-quantitative estimates of N₂ fixation. A fairly large discrepancy was found between estimations by δ¹⁵N and by N yield at 0 kg N/ha of fertilizer. More precise estimates were made by following changes in plant δ¹⁵N when fertilizer δ¹⁵N was varied near¹⁵N natural abundance level. Clearcut linear relationships between δ¹⁵N values of whole plants and of fertilizer were obtained at 30 kg N/ha of fertilizer for three kinds of soils. In experimental field plots, nodulating soybeans obtained 13±1% of their nitrogen from fertilizer, 66±8% from N₂ fixation and 21±10% from soil nitrogen in Andosol brown soil; 30%, 16% and 54% in Andosol black soil; 7%, 77% and 16% in Alluvial soil, respectively. These values for N₂ fixation coincided with each corresponding estimation by N yield method. Other results include: 1)¹⁵N content in upland soils and plants was variable, and may reflect differences in the mode of mineralization of soil organics, and 2) nitrogen isotopic discrimination during fertilizer uptake (δ¹⁵N of plant minus fertilizer) ranged from −2.2 to +4.9‰ at 0–30 kg N/ha of fertilizer, depending on soil type and plant species. The proposed method can accurately and relatively simply establish the importance of symbiotic nitrogen fixation for soybeans growing in agricultural settings.     

Absorption of molecular urea by rice under flooded and non-flooded soil conditions

A pot experiment was conducted with rice to study the relative absorption of urea in molecular form compared to the other forms of N produced in soil from the applied urea. A method involving application of ¹⁴C-labelled urea and ¹⁵N-labelled urea alternately in two splits was used to quantify the absorption of molecular urea and other forms of N formed from it. Biomass production and N uptake were greater in plants grown under flooded soil conditions than in plants grown under non-flooded (upland) conditions. Absorption of N by rice increased with increasing rate of urea application up to 250 mg pot⁻¹ and declined thereafter. The absorption of urea from the flooded soil constituted 9.4% of total N uptake from applied N compared to only 0.2% from the non-flooded. Under submerged conditions, absorption of urea from topdressing was about twice that from basal application at planting. High water solubility of the fertilizer and better developed rice root system might have enhanced the absorption of molecular urea by flooded rice, especially from topdressing. Thus, in the flooded rice system, the direct absorption of molecular urea from topdressing accounted for 6.3% of the total N uptake from added urea. Under upland condition, it was 0.12%. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Crop uptake and leaching losses of15N labelled fertilizer nitrogen in relation to waterlogging of clay and sandy loam soils

Summary Ammonium nitrate fertilizer, labelled with¹⁵N, was applied in spring to winter wheat growing in undisturbed monoliths of clay and sandy loam soil in lysimeters; the rates of application were respectively 95 and 102 kg N ha⁻¹ in the spring of 1976 and 1975. Crops of winter wheat, oilseed rape, peas and barley grown in the following 5 or 6 years were treated with unlabelled nitrogen fertilizer at rates recommended for maximum yields. During each year of the experiments the lysimeters were divided into treatments which were either freelydrained or subjected to periods of waterlogging. Another labelled nitrogen application was made in 1980 to a separate group of lysimeters with a clay soil and a winter wheat crop to study further the uptake of nitrogen fertilizer in relation to waterlogging. In the first growing season, shoots of the winter wheat at harvest contained 46 and 58% of the fertilizer nitrogen applied to the clay and sandy loam soils respectively. In the following year the crops contained a further 1–2% of the labelled fertilizer, and after 5 and 6 years the total recoveries of labelled fertilizer in the crops were 49 and 62% on the clay and sandy loam soils respectively. In the first winter after the labelled fertilizer was applied, less than 1% of the fertilizer was lost in the drainage water, and only about 2% of the total nitrogen (mainly nitrate) in the drainage water from both soils was derived from the fertilizer. Maximum annual loss occurred the following year but the proportion of tracer nitrogen in drainage was nevertheless smaller. Leaching losses over the 5 and 6 years from the clay and sandy loam soil were respectively 1.3 and 3.9% of the original application. On both soils the percentage of labelled nitrogen to the total crop nitrogen content was greater after a period of winter waterlogging than for freely-drained treatments. This was most marked on the clay soil; evidence points to winter waterlogging promoting denitrification and the consequent loss of soil nitrogen making the crop more dependent on spring fertilizer applications.     

Nitrogen uptake by crops,soil distribution and recovery of urea-N in a sorghum—wheat rotation in different soils under Mediterranean conditions

The N uptake by crops, soil distribution and recovery of 15N labelled urea-N (100 kg N ha-1) were investigated in a sorghum-wheat rotation in two silty clay soils (Foggia and Rieti Casabianca) and one silt loam soil (Rieti Piedifiume) under different mediterranean conditions. Non-exchangeable labelled NH4-N represented an important pool at both Rieti sites with higher values (p<0.05) under sorghum (14.0 and 24.6% of the urea N in the 0-20 cm layer at the end of the cropping season) than wheat whereas it was much less important in the Foggia soil (10.0% in the surface soil under sorghum). This is probably related to the clay minerals composition of the three soils; because vermiculite was present in both Rieti sites but not in the Foggia soil. At harvest from 4.4 to 5.3% of the urea N initially applied was present as microbial biomass N in the surface soil layer with no generally significant differences due to location and type of crops. Both sorghum and wheat N yields were higher in the driest site (Foggia) probably due to better light conditions, higher temperatures and irrigation during summer of the sorghum cropping period. The recovery of plant fertilizer N (about 21% for sorghum and 27% for wheat) and the percentage of N in the plant derived from the fertilizer (NDFF) were the lowest at Rieti-Casabianca probably as the result of the protection of immobilized fertilizer N against microbial mineralization by the swelling clays. The fertilizer N unaccounted for was nil or very low (10.8% at Rieti-Casabianca under wheat and 11.8 and 4.9% at Rieti-Piedifiume under sorghum and wheat, respectively). Urea-N losses occurred when Rieti Piedifiume and Rieti Casabianca soils were kept bare. In this case the urea N unaccounted for ranged from 12 to 56% of the urea N with higher losses in Rieti-Piedifiume than in Rieti-Casabianca. The higher recoveries in the latter soil were probably confirmed by the stabilizing effect of clays on the immobilized urea N. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Crop uptake and leaching of 15N applied in ruminant slurry with selectively labelled faeces and urine fractions

Two animal slurries either labelled with ¹⁵N in the urine or in the faeces fraction, were produced by feeding a sheep with unlabelled and ¹⁵N-labelled hay and collecting faeces and urine separately. The slurries were applied (12 g total N ^-2) to a coarse sand and a sandy loam soil confined in lysimeters and growing spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Reference lysimeters without slurry were supplied with¹⁵ NH₄ ¹⁵NO³ corresponding to the inorganic N applied with the slurries (6 g N m^-2). In the second year, all lysimeters received unlabelled mineral fertilizer (6 g N m^-2) and grew spring barley. N harvested in the two crops (grain + straw) and the loss of nitrate by leaching were determined. ¹⁵N in the urine fraction was less available for crop uptake than mineral fertilizer ¹⁵N. The first barley crop on the sandy loam removed 49% of the ¹⁵N applied in mineral fertilizer and 36% of that applied with urine. The availability of fertilizer ¹⁵N (36%) and urine¹⁵ N (32%) differed less on the coarse sand. Of the¹⁵ N added with the faeces fraction, 12–14% was taken up by the barley crop on the two soils. N mineralized from faeces compensated for the reduced availability of urine N providing a similar or higher crop N uptake in manured lysimeters compared with mineral fertilized ones.About half of the total N uptake in the first crop originated from the N applied either as slurry or mineral fertilizer. The remaining N was derived from the soil N pool. Substantially smaller but similar proportions of¹⁵ N from faeces, urine and fertilizer were found in the second crop. The similar recoveries indicated a slow mineralization rate of the residual faeces N since more faeces was left in the soil after the first crop.More N was lost by leaching from manured lysimeters but as a percentage of N applied, losses were similar to those from mineral fertilizer. During the first and second winter, 3–5% and 1–3%, respectively, of the ¹⁵N in slurry and mineral fertilizer was leached as nitrate. Thus slurry N applied in spring just before sowing did not appear to be more prone to loss by nitrate leaching than N given in mineral fertilizer. Slurry N accounted for a higher proportion of the N leached, however, because more N was added in this treatment.     

A comparison of the isotope recovery and difference methods for determining nitrogen fertilizer efficiency

In an experiment with sorghum on a medium deep red soil (Udic Rhodustalf) at Patancheru, India, where¹⁵N-labeled urea was applied at different rates during the 1981 rainy season, the apparent (ARF) and isotope recovery fractions (¹⁵NRF) were appreciably different, particularly at lower rates of fertilizer application. The fertilizer rates were corrected for losses of fertilizer nitrogen, that were estimated from the differences in the amounts of¹⁵N recovered in the soil and the crop, and the known amounts of¹⁵N applied. Introducing these ‘effective’ fertilizer rates, the apparent discrepancy between ARF and¹⁵NRF could be explained if it were assumed that the¹⁵N immobilized in the organic soil fraction was not remineralized during the course of the growing season. In the difference method, the equivalent amount of nitrogen at natural abundance released in exchange for fertilizer nitrogen (5 atom % xs¹⁵N) immobilized in the organic nitrogen fraction is treated as ‘fertilizer nitrogen’, since no distinction is made between¹⁴N and¹⁵N. In the isotope-dilution method, the nitrogen at natural abundance mineralized during biological interchange is not considered fertilizer nitrogen, and therefore the assumed effective amount of fertilizer nitrogen available to the crop is less than in the difference method.     

Availability of nitrogen from 15N-labelled Azolla pinnata and urea to flooded rice

In view of the recently generated interest in Azolla and the high cost of N fertilizers, this field study was aimed at measuring the availability of Azolla-N applied in two split application in comparison to urea-N. Azolla was cultivated and labelled with ¹⁵N isotope in the field. A total of about 60 kg N ha^-1 was applied as Azolla, urea or Azolla and urea in combination, in two equal splits at transplanting and at maximum tillering, i.e. 30 days after transplanting (30 DAT).The recovery by the crop of Azolla-N applied at 30 DAT was significantly higher than that applied at transplanting, viz. 30.2% and 20.2%, respectively. The recoveries of urea-N applied at the same stages were similarly low, viz. 22.5% at transplanting and 38.6% at 30 DAT. Total recoveries of fertilizer N at the time of harvest were 26.8% from Azolla, 30.7% from urea applied in the same two splits and 49.1% from urea applied in locally recommended three splits. Recoveries of labelled Azolla-N in succeeding rice crop were twice higher than those of labelled urea-N. The recoveries ranged from 1.9 to 2.1% from urea-N and 4.0 to 4.9% from Azolla-N. There were no differences in residual ¹⁵N recovery in the succeeding crop between Azolla and urea either applied at transplanting or at 30 DAT.     

Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in relation to stand age of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell

Lupins, canola, ryegrass and wheat fertilized with Na₂ ³⁵SO₄ and either ¹⁵NH₄Cl or K¹⁵NO₃(N:S=10:1), were grown in the field in unconfined microplots, and the sources of N and S (fertilizer, soil, atmosphere, seed) in plant tops during crop development were estimated. Modelled estimates of the proportion of lupin N derived from the atmosphere, which were obtained independently of reference plants, were used to calculate the proportion of lupin N derived from the soil. Total uptake of N and S and uptake of labelled N and S increased during crop development. Total uptake of S by canola was higher than lupins, but labelled S uptake by lupins exceeded uptake by canola. The form of N applied had no effect on uptake of labelled and unlabelled forms of N or S. Ratios of labelled to unlabelled S and ratios of labelled to unlabelled N derived from soil sources decreased during growth, and were less for S than for N for each crop at each sampling time. Although ratios of labelled to unlabelled soil-derived N were similar between crops at 155, 176 and 190 days after sowing, ratios of labelled to unlabelled S for lupins were higher than for the reference crops and declined during this period. The ratios of labelled to unlabelled S in lupins and the reference plants therefore bore no relationship either to ratios of labelled to unlabelled soil-derived N in the plants, or to total S uptake by the plants. Therefore the hypothesis that equal ratios of labelled N to unlabelled soil-derived N in legumes (Rleg) and reference plants (Rref) would be indicated by equal ratios of labelled to unlabelled S was not supported by the data. The results therefore show that the accuracy of reference plant-derived values of Rleg cannot be evaluated by labelling with ³⁵S.