Prediction of protein structural class for the twilight zone sequences

Structural class characterizes the overall folding type of a protein or its domain. This paper develops an accurate method for in silico prediction of structural classes from low homology (twilight zone) protein sequences. The proposed LLSC-PRED method applies linear logistic regression classifier and a custom-designed, feature-based sequence representation to provide predictions. The main advantages of the LLSC-PRED are the comprehensive representation that includes 58 features describing composition and physicochemical properties of the sequences and transparency of the prediction model. The representation also includes predicted secondary structure content, thus for the first time exploring synergy between these two related predictions. Based on tests performed with a large set of 1673 twilight zone domains, the LLSC-PRED's prediction accuracy, which equals over 62%, is shown to be better than accuracy of over a dozen recently published competing in silico methods and similar to accuracy of other, non-transparent classifiers that use the proposed representation.     

Benchmarking secondary structure prediction for fold recognition

If secondary structure predictions are to be incorporated into fold recognition methods, an assessment of the effect of specific types of errors in predicted secondary structures on the sensitivity of fold recognition should be carried out. Here, we present a systematic comparison of different secondary structure prediction methods by measuring frequencies of specific types of error. We carry out an evaluation of the effect of specific types of error on secondary structure element alignment (SSEA), a baseline fold recognition method. The results of this evaluation indicate that missing out whole helix or strand elements, or predicting the wrong type of element, is more detrimental than predicting the wrong lengths of elements or overpredicting helix or strand. We also suggest that SSEA scoring is an effective method for assessing accuracy of secondary structure prediction and perhaps may also provide a more appropriate assessment of the "usefulness" and quality of predicted secondary structure, if secondary structure alignments are to be used in fold recognition.     

Inaccurate secondary structure predictions often indicate protein fold switching

Although most proteins conform to the classical one‐structure/one‐function paradigm, an increasing number of proteins with dual structures and functions have been discovered. In response to cellular stimuli, such proteins undergo structural changes sufficiently dramatic to remodel even their secondary structures and domain organization. This “fold‐switching” capability fosters protein multi‐functionality, enabling cells to establish tight control over various biochemical processes. Accurate predictions of fold‐switching proteins could both suggest underlying mechanisms for uncharacterized biological processes and reveal potential drug targets. Recently, we developed a prediction method for fold‐switching proteins using structure‐based thermodynamic calculations and discrepancies between predicted and experimentally determined protein secondary structure (Porter and Looger, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:5968–5973). Here we seek to leverage the negative information found in these secondary structure prediction discrepancies. To do this, we quantified secondary structure prediction accuracies of 192 known fold‐switching regions (FSRs) within solved protein structures found in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We find that the secondary structure prediction accuracies for these FSRs vary widely. Inaccurate secondary structure predictions are strongly associated with fold‐switching proteins compared to equally long segments of non‐fold‐switching proteins selected at random. These inaccurate predictions are enriched in helix‐to‐strand and strand‐to‐coil discrepancies. Finally, we find that most proteins with inaccurate secondary structure predictions are underrepresented in the PDB compared with their alternatively folded cognates, suggesting that unequal representation of fold‐switching conformers within the PDB could be an important cause of inaccurate secondary structure predictions. These results demonstrate that inconsistent secondary structure predictions can serve as a useful preliminary marker of fold switching.     

Rapid protein domain assignment from amino acid sequence using predicted secondary structure

The elucidation of the domain content of a given protein sequence in the absence of determined structure or significant sequence homology to known domains is an important problem in structural biology. Here we address how successfully the delineation of continuous domains can be accomplished in the absence of sequence homology using simple baseline methods, an existing prediction algorithm (Domain Guess by Size), and a newly developed method (DomSSEA). The study was undertaken with a view to measuring the usefulness of these prediction methods in terms of their application to fully automatic domain assignment. Thus, the sensitivity of each domain assignment method was measured by calculating the number of correctly assigned top scoring predictions. We have implemented a new continuous domain identification method using the alignment of predicted secondary structures of target sequences against observed secondary structures of chains with known domain boundaries as assigned by Class Architecture Topology Homology (CATH). Taking top predictions only, the success rate of the method in correctly assigning domain number to the representative chain set is 73.3%. The top prediction for domain number and location of domain boundaries was correct for 24% of the multidomain set (+/-20 residues). These results have been put into context in relation to the results obtained from the other prediction methods assessed.     

Sequence Representation and Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure for Structural Motifs in Twilight Zone Proteins

Characterizing and classifying regularities in protein structure is an important element in uncovering the mechanisms that regulate protein structure, function and evolution. Recent research concentrates on analysis of structural motifs that can be used to describe larger, fold-sized structures based on homologous primary sequences. At the same time, accuracy of secondary protein structure prediction based on multiple sequence alignment drops significantly when low homology (twilight zone) sequences are considered. To this end, this paper addresses a problem of providing an alternative sequences representation that would improve ability to distinguish secondary structures for the twilight zone sequences without using alignment. We consider a novel classification problem, in which, structural motifs, referred to as structural fragments (SFs) are defined as uniform strand, helix and coil fragments. Classification of SFs allows to design novel sequence representations, and to investigate which other factors and prediction algorithms may result in the improved discrimination. Comprehensive experimental results show that statistically significant improvement in classification accuracy can be achieved by: (1) improving sequence representations, and (2) removing possible noise on the terminal residues in the SFs. Combining these two approaches reduces the error rate on average by 15% when compared to classification using standard representation and noisy information on the terminal residues, bringing the classification accuracy to over 70%. Finally, we show that certain prediction algorithms, such as neural networks and boosted decision trees, are superior to other algorithms.This research was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).     

Prediction of beta-turns in proteins from multiple alignment using neural network

A neural network-based method has been developed for the prediction of beta-turns in proteins by using multiple sequence alignment. Two feed-forward back-propagation networks with a single hidden layer are used where the first-sequence structure network is trained with the multiple sequence alignment in the form of PSI-BLAST-generated position-specific scoring matrices. The initial predictions from the first network and PSIPRED-predicted secondary structure are used as input to the second structure-structure network to refine the predictions obtained from the first net. A significant improvement in prediction accuracy has been achieved by using evolutionary information contained in the multiple sequence alignment. The final network yields an overall prediction accuracy of 75.5% when tested by sevenfold cross-validation on a set of 426 nonhomologous protein chains. The corresponding Q(pred), Q(obs), and Matthews correlation coefficient values are 49.8%, 72.3%, and 0.43, respectively, and are the best among all the previously published beta-turn prediction methods. The Web server BetaTPred2 (http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/betatpred2/) has been developed based on this approach.     

Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans

Prediction of transmembrane spans and secondary structure from the protein sequence is generally the first step in the structural characterization of (membrane) proteins. Preference of a stretch of amino acids in a protein to form secondary structure and being placed in the membrane are correlated. Nevertheless, current methods predict either secondary structure or individual transmembrane states. We introduce a method that simultaneously predicts the secondary structure and transmembrane spans from the protein sequence. This approach not only eliminates the necessity to create a consensus prediction from possibly contradicting outputs of several predictors but bears the potential to predict conformational switches, i.e., sequence regions that have a high probability to change for example from a coil conformation in solution to an α‐helical transmembrane state. An artificial neural network was trained on databases of 177 membrane proteins and 6048 soluble proteins. The output is a 3 × 3 dimensional probability matrix for each residue in the sequence that combines three secondary structure types (helix, strand, coil) and three environment types (membrane core, interface, solution). The prediction accuracies are 70.3% for nine possible states, 73.2% for three‐state secondary structure prediction, and 94.8% for three‐state transmembrane span prediction. These accuracies are comparable to state‐of‐the‐art predictors of secondary structure (e.g., Psipred) or transmembrane placement (e.g., OCTOPUS). The method is available as web server and for download at www.meilerlab.org . Proteins 2013; 81:1127–1140. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Progress of 1D protein structure prediction at last

Accuracy of predicting protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility from sequence information has been improved significantly by using information contained in multiple sequence alignments as input to a neural 'network system. For the Asilomar meeting, predictions for 13 proteins were generated automatically using the publicly available prediction method PHD. The results confirm the estimate of 72% three-state prediction accuracy. The fairly accurate predictions of secondary structure segments made the tool useful as a starting point for modeling of higher dimensional aspects of protein structure. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Generation of deviation parameters for amino acid singlets, doublets and triplets from three-dimensional structures of proteins and its implications for secondary structure prediction from amino acid sequences

We present a new method, secondary structure prediction by deviation parameter (SSPDP) for predicting the secondary structure of proteins from amino acid sequence. Deviation parameters (DP) for amino acid singlets, doublets and triplets were computed with respect to secondary structural elements of proteins based on the dictionary of secondary structure prediction (DSSP)-generated secondary structure for 408 selected nonhomologous proteins. To the amino acid triplets which are not found in the selected dataset, a DP value of zero is assigned with respect to the secondary structural elements of proteins. The total number of parameters generated is 15,432, in the possible parameters of 25,260. Deviation parameter is complete with respect to amino acid singlets, doublets, and partially complete with respect to amino acid triplets. These generated parameters were used to predict secondary structural elements from amino acid sequence. The secondary structure predicted by our method (SSPDP) was compared with that of single sequence (NNPREDICT) and multiple sequence (PHD) methods. The average value of the percentage of prediction accuracy for αhelix by SSPDP, NNPREDICT and PHD methods was found to be 57%, 44% and 69% respectively for the proteins in the selected dataset. For Β-strand the prediction accuracy is found to be 69%, 21% and 53% respectively by SSPDP, NNPREDICT and PHD methods. This clearly indicates that the secondary structure prediction by our method is as good as PHD method but much better than NNPREDICT method.     

Predicting protein secondary structure content. A tandem neural network approach.

A priori knowledge of secondary structure content can be of great use in theoretical and experimental determination of protein structure. We present a method that uses two computer-simulated neural networks placed in "tandem" to predict the secondary structure content of water-soluble, globular proteins. The first of the two networks, NET1, predicts a protein's helix and strand content given information about the protein's amino acid composition, molecular weight and heme presence. Because NET1 contained more adjustable parameters (network weights) than learning examples, this network experienced problems with memorization, which is the inability to generalize onto new, never-seen-before examples. To overcome this problem, we designed a second network, NET2, which learned to determine when NET1 was in a state of generalization. Together, these two networks produce prediction errors as low as 5.0% and 5.6% for helix and strand content, respectively, on a set of protein crystal structures bearing little homology to those used in network training. A comparison between three other methods including a multiple linear regression analysis, a non-hidden-node network analysis and a secondary structure assignment analysis reveals that our tandem neural network scheme is, indeed, the best method for predicting secondary structure content. The results of our analysis suggest that the knowledge of sequence information is not necessary for highly accurate predictions of protein secondary structure content.     

Protein structure prediction

Current methods developed for predicting protein structure are reviewed. The most widely used algorithms of Chou and Fasman and Garnier et al for predicting secondary structure are compared to the most recent ones including sequence similarity methods, neural network, pattern recognition or joint prediction methods. The best of these methods correctly predict 63-65% of the residues in the database with cross-validation for 3 conformations, helix, beta strand and coli with a standard deviation of 6-8% per protein. However, when a homologous protein is already in the database, the accuracy of prediction by the similarity peptide method of Levin and Garnier reaches about 90%. Some conclusions can be drawn on the mechanism of protein folding. As all the prediction methods only use the local sequence for prediction (+/- 8 residues maximum) one can infer that 65% of the conformation of a residue is dictated on average by the local sequence, the rest is brought by the folding. The best predicted proteins or peptide segments are those for which the folding has less effect on the conformation. Presently, prediction of tertiary structure is only of practical use when the structure of a homologous protein is already known. Amino acid alignment to define residues of equivalent spatial position is critical for modelling of the protein. We showed for serine proteases that secondary structure prediction can help to define a better alignment. Non-homologous segments of the polypeptide chain, such as loops, libraries of known loops and/or energy minimization with various force fields, are used without yet giving satisfactory solutions. An example of modelling by homology, aided by secondary structure prediction on 2 regulatory proteins, Fnr and FixK is presented.     

Prediction of protein secondary structure content using amino acid composition and evolutionary information

Knowing protein structure and inferring its function from the structure are one of the main issues of computational structural biology, and often the first step is studying protein secondary structure. There have been many attempts to predict protein secondary structure contents. Previous attempts assumed that the content of protein secondary structure can be predicted successfully using the information on the amino acid composition of a protein. Recent methods achieved remarkable prediction accuracy by using the expanded composition information. The overall average error of the most successful method is 3.4%. Here, we demonstrate that even if we only use the simple amino acid composition information alone, it is possible to improve the prediction accuracy significantly if the evolutionary information is included. The idea is motivated by the observation that evolutionarily related proteins share the similar structure. After calculating the homolog-averaged amino acid composition of a protein, which can be easily obtained from the multiple sequence alignment by running PSI-BLAST, those 20 numbers are learned by a multiple linear regression, an artificial neural network and a support vector regression. The overall average error of method by a support vector regression is 3.3%. It is remarkable that we obtain the comparable accuracy without utilizing the expanded composition information such as pair-coupled amino acid composition. This work again demonstrates that the amino acid composition is a fundamental characteristic of a protein. It is anticipated that our novel idea can be applied to many areas of protein bioinformatics where the amino acid composition information is utilized, such as subcellular localization prediction, enzyme subclass prediction, domain boundary prediction, signal sequence prediction, and prediction of unfolded segment in a protein sequence, to name a few.     

Helix‐sheet packing in proteins

The three‐dimensional structure of a protein is organized around the packing of its secondary structure elements. Although much is known about the packing geometry observed between α‐helices and between β‐sheets, there has been little progress on characterizing helix–sheet interactions. We present an analysis of the conformation of αβ₂ motifs in proteins, corresponding to all occurrences of helices in contact with two strands that are hydrogen bonded. The geometry of the αβ₂ motif is characterized by the azimuthal angle θ between the helix axis and an average vector representing the two strands, the elevation angle ψ between the helix axis and the plane containing the two strands, and the distance D between the helix and the strands. We observe that the helix tends to align to the two strands, with a preference for an antiparallel orientation if the two strands are parallel; this preference is diminished for other topologies of the β‐sheet. Side‐chain packing at the interface between the helix and the strands is mostly hydrophobic, with a preference for aliphatic amino acids in the strand and aromatic amino acids in the helix. From the knowledge of the geometry and amino acid propensities of αβ₂ motifs in proteins, we have derived different statistical potentials that are shown to be efficient in picking native‐like conformations among a set of non‐native conformations in well‐known decoy datasets. The information on the geometry of αβ₂ motifs as well as the related statistical potentials have applications in the field of protein structure prediction. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A neural-network based method for prediction of gamma-turns in proteins from multiple sequence alignment

In the present study, an attempt has been made to develop a method for predicting gamma-turns in proteins. First, we have implemented the commonly used statistical and machine-learning techniques in the field of protein structure prediction, for the prediction of gamma-turns. All the methods have been trained and tested on a set of 320 nonhomologous protein chains by a fivefold cross-validation technique. It has been observed that the performance of all methods is very poor, having a Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) 相似文献   

Improved prediction for N-termini of alpha-helices using empirical information

The prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequences remains a key component of many approaches to the protein folding problem. The most abundant form of regular secondary structure in proteins is the alpha-helix, in which specific residue preferences exist at the N-terminal locations. Propensities derived from these observed amino acid frequencies in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database correlate well with experimental free energies measured for residues at different N-terminal positions in alanine-based peptides. We report a novel method to exploit this data to improve protein secondary structure prediction through identification of the correct N-terminal sequences in alpha-helices, based on existing popular methods for secondary structure prediction. With this algorithm, the number of correctly predicted alpha-helix start positions was improved from 30% to 38%, while the overall prediction accuracy (Q3) remained the same, using cross-validated testing. Although the algorithm was developed and tested on multiple sequence alignment-based secondary structure predictions, it was also able to improve the predictions of start locations by methods that use single sequences to make their predictions. Furthermore, the residue frequencies at N-terminal positions of the improved predictions better reflect those seen at the N-terminal positions of alpha-helices in proteins. This has implications for areas such as comparative modeling, where a more accurate prediction of the N-terminal regions of alpha-helices should benefit attempts to model adjacent loop regions. The algorithm is available as a Web tool, located at http://rocky.bms.umist.ac.uk/elephant.     

Patterns,structures, and amino acid frequencies in structural building blocks,a protein secondary structure classification scheme

To study local structures in proteins, we previously developed an autoassociative artificial neural network (autoANN) and clustering tool to discover intrinsic features of macromolecular structures. The hidden unit activations computed by the trained autoANN are a convenient low-dimensional encoding of the local protein backbone structure. Clustering these activation vectors results in a unique classification of protein local structural features called Structural Building Blocks (SBBs). Here we describe application of this method to a larger database of proteins, verification of the applicability of this method to structure classification, and subsequent analysis of amino acid frequencies and several commonly occurring patterns of SBBs. The SBB classification method has several interesting properties: 1) it identifies the regular secondary structures, α helix and β strand; 2) it consistently identifies other local structure features (e.g., helix caps and strand caps); 3) strong amino acid preferences are revealed at some positions in some SBBs; and 4) distinct patterns of SBBs occur in the “random coil” regions of proteins. Analysis of these patterns identifies interesting structural motifs in the protein backbone structure, indicating that SBBs can be used as “building blocks” in the analysis of protein structure. This type of pattern analysis should increase our understanding of the relationship between protein sequence and local structure, especially in the prediction of protein structures. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Seventy-five percent accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction

In this study we present an accurate secondary structure prediction procedure by using a query and related sequences. The most novel aspect of our approach is its reliance on local pairwise alignment of the sequence to be predicted with each related sequence rather than utilization of a multiple alignment. The residue-by-residue accuracy of the method is 75% in three structural states after jack-knife tests. The gain in prediction accuracy compared with the existing techniques, which are at best 72%, is achieved by secondary structure propensities based on both local and long-range effects, utilization of similar sequence information in the form of carefully selected pairwise alignment fragments, and reliance on a large collection of known protein primary structures. The method is especially appropriate for large-scale sequence analysis efforts such as genome characterization, where precise and significant multiple sequence alignments are not available or achievable. Proteins 27:329–335, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

A simple and fast approach to prediction of protein secondary structure from multiply aligned sequences with accuracy above 70%.

To improve secondary structure predictions in protein sequences, the information residing in multiple sequence alignments of substituted but structurally related proteins is exploited. A database comprised of 70 protein families and a total of 2,500 sequences, some of which were aligned by tertiary structural superpositions, was used to calculate residue exchange weight matrices within alpha-helical, beta-strand, and coil substructures, respectively. Secondary structure predictions were made based on the observed residue substitutions in local regions of the multiple alignments and the largest possible associated exchange weights in each of the three matrix types. Comparison of the observed and predicted secondary structure on a per-residue basis yielded a mean accuracy of 72.2%. Individual alpha-helix, beta-strand, and coil states were respectively predicted at 66.7, and 75.8% correctness, representing a well-balanced three-state prediction. The accuracy level, verified by cross-validation through jack-knife tests on all protein families, dropped, on average, to only 70.9%, indicating the rigor of the prediction procedure. On the basis of robustness, conceptual clarity, accuracy, and executable efficiency, the method has considerable advantage, especially with its sole reliance on amino acid substitutions within structurally related proteins.     

Fine-tuning structural RNA alignments in the twilight zone

Background  

A widely used method to find conserved secondary structure in RNA is to first construct a multiple sequence alignment, and then fold the alignment, optimizing a score based on thermodynamics and covariance. This method works best around 75% sequence similarity. However, in a "twilight zone" below 55% similarity, the sequence alignment tends to obscure the covariance signal used in the second phase. Therefore, while the overall shape of the consensus structure may still be found, the degree of conservation cannot be estimated reliably.