Association between <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTM1</Emphasis>, <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTT1</Emphasis>, and <Emphasis Type="Italic">GSTP1</Emphasis> polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in a Turkish population

Several studies focused on investigating genetic polymorphisms in order to estimate genetic contribution to lung cancer often showed conflicting results. In this study, we investigated the role of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 exon 5 and exon 6 polymorphisms on developing lung cancer and histological subtypes in 213 lung cancer patients and 231 controls. GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and GSTP1 exon 5 variant genotypes did not show a significant risk for developing lung cancer overall. Significant association was noted between GSTP1 exon 6 variant genotypes and overall lung cancer risk (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.25–3.78; P = 0.006). These results show that GSTP1 exon 6 polymorphism might be an important factor in determining lung cancer susceptibility in a Turkish population.     

Polymorphisms in the HPC/ELAC-2 and alpha 1-antitrypsin genes that correlate with human diseases in a North Indian population

Two genes HPC/ELAC-2 and AAT were studied in north Indian population. HPC/ELAC-2 was studied in prostate cancer cases and AAT was studied in COPD patients. HPC/ELAC-2 is considered as an important cancer-susceptibility gene in prostate cancer. There are two common polymorphisms of this gene, i.e., Ser217Leu and Ala541Thr. Alpha 1 antitrypsin is a highly polymorphic anti-elastase enzyme, especially active in the protection of alveoli and liver. In the present study, we observed the distribution of two deficient alleles PiZ and Pi S in COPD patients. We extracted the DNA from 157 prostate cancer cases, 200 COPD patients, 170 BPH and 370 healthy controls. The polymorphisms were studied by PCR–RFLP technique. The mutant genotype (Leu/Leu) of HPC/ELAC-2 was present in 9.6, 7.6 and 5.9% of BPH, cancer cases and healthy controls, respectively. Higher risk of Ser/Leu as well as Leu/Leu had shown when compared to healthy controls. That was about 1.5 and 1.7-fold (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 0.96–2.51; OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 0.74–3.92), respectively. Risk was found to be increased in smokers and those consuming non-vegetarian diet. Our results suggest that the HPC/ELAC-2 polymorphisms, especially in localized cases, could help to predict prostate cancer risk and confirm its high prevalence of the leu/leu allele in north Indian population. Considering heterozygous PiZ genotype, we obtained an OR of 3.82 (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis adjusted by age sex and drinking habit showed 4.15-fold increased risk for COPD in PiZ heterozygous individuals. No increased risk was observed in the individuals carrying PiS alleles.     

Glutathione S-Transferase M1, T1, P1 Genotypes and Risk for Development of Colorectal Cancer

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) supergene family is an important part of cellular enzyme defense against endogenous and exogenous chemicals, many of which have carcinogenic potential. The present investigation was conducted to detect a possible association between polymorphisms at the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genes and the interaction with cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer incidence. We examined 181 patients with colorectal cancer and 204 controls. DNA was extracted from whole blood, and the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms were determined using a real-time polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence resonance energy transfer with a Light-Cycler instrument. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of colorectal cancer were examined by use of logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The GSTM1 polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06–2.46). Also the risk of colorectal cancer associated with the GSTT1 null genotype was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10–2.59). Statistically no differences were found between patients with colorectal cancer and control groups for the GSTP1 Ile/Ile, Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes. In addition, the frequencies of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion genotypes differed significantly between the cases and controls for current smokers; the GSTT1 null genotype especially is associated with a greater risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.24–4.81). The GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions were associated with an increased risk of developing a transverse or rectal tumor (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.15–3.00; OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.02–2.84; respectively). The glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms were not associated with risk in patients stratified by age. The risk of colorectal cancer increased as putative high-risk genotypes increased for the combined genotypes of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null, and either GSTP1 valine heterozygosity or GSTP1 valine homozygosity (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.02–7.11). In conclusion, the results obtained in this study clearly suggest that those susceptibility factors related to different GST polymorphic enzymes are predisposing for colorectal cancer.     

Null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 contribute to increased risk of diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common disease which results from various causes including genetic and environmental factors. Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) and Glutathione S-Transferase T1 (GSTT1) genes are polymorphic in human and the null genotypes lead to the absence of enzyme function. Many studies assessed the associations between GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes and DM risk but reported conflicting results. In order to get a more precise estimate of the associations of GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotypes with DM risk, we performed this meta-analysis. Published literature from PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases was searched for eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model. 11 publications (a total of 2577 cases and 4572 controls) were finally included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analyses indicated that null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 were all associated with increased risk of DM (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.60, 95%CI 1.10–2.34, P_OR = 0.014; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.47, 95%CI 1.12–1.92, P_OR = 0.005; GSTM1–GSTT1: OR _{fixed-effects} = 1.83, 95%CI 1.30–2.59, P_OR = 0.001). Subgroup by ethnicity suggested significant associations between null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and DM risk among Asians (GSTM1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.77, 95%CI 1.24–2.53, P_OR = 0.002; GSTT1: OR _{random-effects} = 1.58, 95%CI 1.09–2.27, P_OR = 0.015). This meta-analysis suggests null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are all associated with increased risk of DM, and null genotypes of GSTM1/GSTT1 and dual null genotype of GSTM1–GSTT1 are potential biomarkers of DM.     

Copy Number Variation of GSTT1 and GSTM1 and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Caribbean Population of African Descent

Background

Deletions of the glutathione S-transferase genes M1 and T1 (GSTM1 and GSTT1) have been studied as potential risk factors for prostate cancer. Conflicting results have been obtained. Moreover, most such studies could not discriminate heterozygous from homozygous carriers of the non-deleted alleles.

Objective

We investigated whether copy number variation (CNV) of the GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 genes contribute to the risk of prostate cancer in the Caribbean population of African descent of Guadeloupe.

Methods

In a population-based case-control study, we compared 629 prostate cancer patients and 622 control subjects. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Exact copy numbers of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were determined by real-time PCR.

Results

A higher copy number of GSTM1 was marginally associated with prostate cancer risk. Men with 2 and 3 or more GSTT1 genes were at higher risk of prostate cancer (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.11–2.16 and OR: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.71–13.99, respectively; P_trend<0.001). Men with 3, 4 and 5 or more copies of both GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes were at higher risk of prostate cancer (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.21–3.91, OR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.63–6.46, and OR: 5.77, 95% CI: 1.40–23.84, respectively; P_trend<0.001).

Conclusions

Copy number of GSTT1 and combined GSTM1/GSTT1 appear to be associated with prostate cancer risk in our population study with gene dose relationship. Our results support the hypothesis that variations in copy number of GSTT1 modulate the risk of prostate cancer.     

DNA repair genes polymorphism (<Emphasis Type="Italic">XPG</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">XRCC1</Emphasis>) and association of prostate cancer in a north Indian population

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer related mortality. Genetic background may account for the difference in susceptibility of individuals to different diseases and the relationship between genetic polymorphism and some diseases has been extensively studied. There are several common polymorphisms in genes encoding DNA repair enzymes, some of these polymorphisms are reported to result in subtle structural alterations of the repair enzyme and modulation of the repair capacity. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of XPG Asp 1104His and XRCC1 Arg309Gln polymorphisms on risk of prostate cancer in north Indian population. Statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer was observed on individuals that posses His/His genotype of XPG (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.99–6.56, P = 0.031). In this study 150 prostate cancer diagnosed patients, 150 healthy controls and 150 BPH (benign prostate hyper plasia) were recruited from north Indian population. Moreover, individuals that carried the Gln/Gln genotype of XRCC1 also showed statistically increased risk of prostate cancer (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.07–4.00, P = 0.033). The Asp/Asp of XPG and Gln/Gln of XRCC1 in combination showed statistically increased risk of prostate cancer in cases (OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.09–10.16, P = 0.032).     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 genotypes and breast cancer risk: a study in a Portuguese population

Glutathione S-transferases are a superfamily of multifunctional enzymes that play a key role in Phase II metabolism, detoxifying therapeutic drugs, and various carcinogens by conjugation with glutathione. We undertook a case-control study in Central-Eastern Portuguese population to evaluate the association of null genotype in GSTM1 and GSTT1 along with the polymorphism in GSTP1 (A/G) and susceptibility to breast cancer. The population sample consisted of 85 patients with histological diagnosis of breast cancer and 102 healthy women. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples, and genotyping analyses were performed by PCR-based methods. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression. We found a increased breast cancer risk associated with GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 3.597; 95% CI = 1.849-6.999; P = 0.0001) and GSTT1 (OR = 2.592; 95% CI = 1.432-4.690; P = 0.002), but the presence of valine alleles compared to isoleucine alleles in codon 105 in GSTP1 did not increase the risk of breast cancer development. The two-way combination of GSTM1 and GTTT1 null genotypes resulted in 8-fold increase for breast cancer risk (OR = 8.287; 95% CI = 3.124-21.980; P = 0.0001) and the three-way combination of GSTP1 105AA/AG and null genotypes for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 resulted in 5-fold increase for breast cancer risk (OR = 5.040; 95% CI = 1.392-18.248; P = 0.016). Our results suggest that GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype alone, both combined or combined with GSTP1 valine alleles, are associated with higher susceptibility to breast cancer development.     

Genetic Polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 with Prostate Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 57 Studies

Background and Objectives

The GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms might be involved in inactivation of procarcinogens that contribute to the genesis and progression of cancers. However, studies investigating the association between GSTM1, GSTT1 or GSTP1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer (PCa) risk report conflicting results, therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy.

Methods

Published literature from PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched (updated to June 2, 2012). According to our inclusion criteria, studies that observed the association between GSTM1, GSTT1 or GSTP1 polymorphisms and PCa risk were included. The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of PCa associated with GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms.

Results

Fifty-seven studies involving 11313 cases and 12934 controls were recruited. The overall OR, which was 1.2854 (95% CI = 1.1405–1.4487), revealed a significant risk of PCa and GSTM1 null genotype, and the similar results were observed when stratified by ethnicity and control source. Further, the more important is that the present study first reported the high risks of PCa for people who with dual null genotype of GSTM1 and GSTT1 (OR = 1.4353, 95% CI = 1.0345–1.9913), or who with GSTT1 null genotype and GSTP1 A131G polymorphism (OR = 1.7335, 95% CI = 1.1067–2.7152). But no association was determined between GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.102, 95% CI = 0.9596–1.2655) or GSTP1 A131G polymorphism (OR = 1.0845, 95% CI = 0.96–1.2251) and the PCa risk.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggested that the people with GSTM1 null genotype, with dual null genotype of GSTM1 and GSTT1, or with GSTT1 null genotype and GSTP1 A131G polymorphism are associated with high risks of PCa, but no association was found between GSTT1 null genotype or GSTP1 A131G polymorphism and the risk of PCa. Further rigorous analytical studies are highly expected to confirm our conclusions and assess gene-environment interactions with PCa risk.     

Analysis of genetic predisposition to pulmonary tuberculosis in native Russians

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most important concerns of public health. There is evidence suggesting that genetic status is responsible for predisposition to infectious diseases including TB. To determine genetic risk factors of TB development, the frequencies of polymorphisms of genes CYP1A1, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, GSTT1, GSTM1, NAT2, MDR1, and NRAMP1 in 73 TB patients and 352 healthy individuals were determined by allele-specific hybridizatio n using microarray technology. The TB patients have shown a significant increase in the frequency of the null GSTT1 genotype (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.91–5.55, p = 0.000028) as well as the double null GSTT1/GSTM1 genotype (OR = 4.05, 95% CI = 2.14-7.65,p = 0.000034) compared to the group of healthy donors. It was shown that the NAT2* 5/* 5 genotype in combination with the “null” GSTT1 and the double “null” GSTT1/GSTM1 genotypes was observed significantly more often in the TB patients than in the control sample. Thus the examined GSTT1, GSTM1 and NAT2 gene polymorphisms may potentially alter the risk of TB development in ethnic Russians and are of interest for further research using larger cohorts of patients.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 gene polymorphism and COPD risk in smokers: an updated analysis

We evaluated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers. A meta-analysis of the published case–control studies was performed. Published literature was retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), with last update in February, 2011. Data were extracted and a fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals depending on statistical heterogeneity. Fourteen eligible studies, comprising 1,665 COPD cases and 1,614 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. The combined analyses showed that there was a significant difference in GSTM1 genotype distribution between COPD cases and controls among Caucasians, but not among Asians. The combined GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype conferred a 1.36-fold greater risk for COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype alone was not associated with enhanced risk for COPD. The GSTM1 null genotype is significantly associated with an increasing susceptibility to COPD in Caucasian smokers, but not in Asian smokers. The GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype is a significant risk factor for developing COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype, however, was not associated with COPD.     

Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, GSTM3 and the susceptibility to gallbladder cancer in North India

Abstract

The glutathione S-transferase (GSTs) are polymorphic supergene family of detoxification enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of numerous potential carcinogens. Several allelic variants of polymorphic GSTs show impaired enzyme activity and are suspected to increase the susceptibility to various cancers. To find out the association of GST variants with risk of gallbladder cancer, the distribution of polymorphisms in the GST family of genes (GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTM3) were studied in 106 cancer patients and 201 healthy controls. Genotypes were analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The frequencies of GSTM1 null and GSTM3*BB genotypes did not differ between patients and controls. The overall frequency of GSTT1 null was lower in cases as compared with controls (p=0.003, Odds ratio (OR)?=?0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–0.6). After sex stratification, the GSTT1 null frequency was reduced only in female patients (p=0.008, OR?=?0.2, 95% CI?=?0.1–0.6). However, the GSTP1, ile/val genotype and the val allele were significantly higher in cases than controls (p=0.013, OR?=?1.9, 95% CI?=?1.1–3.1; p=0.027, OR?=?1.5, 95% CI?=?1.0–2.1), respectively. To study gene–gene interactions, a combined risk of gallbladder cancer due to ile/val or val/val were calculated in combination with null alleles of GSTM1 and GSTT1 or the *B allele of GSTM3, but there was no enhancement of risk. Gallstones were present in 57.5% of patients with gallbladder cancer, but there were no significant differences between allelic/genotype frequencies of the studied GST genes polymorphisms between patients with or without gallstones. To best of our knowledge, this is the first paper showing ile/val genotypes and val allele of GSTP1 to be associated with higher risk of gallbladder cancer.     

Polymorphisms of glutathione-S-transferase M1 and T1 and prostate cancer risk in a Tunisian population

Several genes involved in the metabolism of carcinogenesis have been found to be polymorphic in the human population, and specific alleles are associated with increase risk of cancer of various sites. This study is focused on the polymorphic enzymes glutathione-S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and T1 (GSTT1) that involved in the detoxification of many xenobiotics involved in the etiology of prostate cancer. Objective. To evaluate whether GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 contribute to prostate cancer (CaP) etiology, we studied 110 incident CaP cases and 122 controls. Results. The probability of having CaP was increased in men who had homozygous deleted (non-functional) genotypes at GSTT1 (OR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1–3.79) but not GSTM1 (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.66–1.88). Hence, individuals lacking the GSTT1 gene are at approximately twofold higher risk of developing prostate cancer in comparison with individuals with at least one active allele in the GSTT1 locus. Conclusion. These results suggest that GSTT1 is associated with CaP risk. The effect of smoking associated with the GSTT10/0 genotype was not found to affect the risk of prostate cancer.     

Association of glutathione S-transferase M1/T1 polymorphisms with susceptibility to vitiligo

Background

Some studies suggested that Glutathione S-transferases M1/T1(GSTM1/T1) null polymorphisms may be associated with the risk of vitiligo.

Aims

The purpose of this study is to further evaluate the association between GSTM1/T1 null polymorphisms and the susceptibility to vitiligo.

Methods

We carried out a retrieval of studies in the databases. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of this association. We analyzed the data using Stata 11.0.

Results

Six case–control studies including 1358 cases and 1673 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Our overall results showed the GSTM1 or GSTT1 null polymorphism was associated with vitiligo (GSTM1:OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.21–2.08, P = 0.001; GSTT1: OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12–1.51, P = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the GSTM1 null polymorphism might be a genetic risk factor to vitiligo in East Asian (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.12–2.63, P = 0.014) but not in the Mediterranean, however individuals with the GSTT1 null polymorphism in the Mediterranean (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.15–2.71, P = 0.010) but not in East Asian have a greater predisposition to vitiligo. In addition there was also a significant trend toward an association with the combination of the GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null in either East Asians or Mediterraneans.

Conclusion

The GSTM1/T1 null polymorphisms may be associated with vitiligo. More studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.     

Combined effect of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms on histological subtypes of lung cancer

Genetic polymorphisms are natural genetic variations in the gene sequence that occur at a frequency of >1% in the population. This genetic variability (polymorphisms) can be a factor in cancer risk. The functional polymorphisms in GST genes play an important role in susceptibility to lung cancer. In our previous study, we reported that the combination of certain genotypes of GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1A1 is associated with lung cancer. The study has been extended to investigate the potential role of polymorphism in GSTP1 alone or in combination with the status of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in the likelihood of development of lung cancer. A total of 302 subjects (151 cases and 151 controls) were evaluated. Using a case–control design, individuals were genotyped for GSTs using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism techniques. The data obtained were analyzed using multiple logistic regression. The combined ‘at risk’ genotypes of GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null in comparison with ‘wild-type’ genotypes seems to be associated with a greater risk of lung cancer, but the results are not significant (odds ratio (OR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–5.96) and for squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) it was 1.6-fold (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.49–5.68). In summary, our case–control study of lung cancer revealed that the effect of these polymorphisms is not very marked for different genotypic combinations of GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 in the context of developing lung cancer in a north Indian population. However, the increased risk was limited to SqCC, and was not found for other histological subtypes. Further analyses on this topic are needed.     

Null Genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 and Endometriosis Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 25 Case-Control Studies

Endometriosis is one of the most frequent benign gynecological disorders. Numerous studies have shown an association between GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 polymorphisms and endometriosis susceptibility. However, these associations remain inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation, we conducted a comprehensive search to identify all existing studies and then performed a meta-analysis. Electronic literature searches of the PubMed, Chinese Biomedical, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were performed up to December 2013. GSTM1-, GSTT1-, and dual-null genotypes were analyzed independently, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by comparing the null genotype with other genotypes using the random-effects or fixed-effects model. Twenty-five and 16 independent studies on GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms, respectively, and five GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analyses were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Both GSTM1- and GSTT1-null genotypes increased risk of endometriosis (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.30–1.83, P<0.001; OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.10–1.82, P = 0.007; respectively). Moreover, we found a significant positive association between the dual null genotype GSTM1-GSTT1 and endometriosis susceptibility (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03–1.72, P = 0.027). This meta-analysis provides evidence that null genotypes of GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 contribute to risk of endometriosis. Further investigations are required to confirm these findings.     

Ethnic differences in the association of the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and risk of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk in populations from different ethnic backgrounds, based on a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE libraries. Thirty-six individual case–control studies comprising 7,689 gastric cancer cases and 12,445 controls were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, the GSTT1 null genotype appeared to increase gastric cancer risk (OR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.06–1.31, p = 0.003). While Caucasian populations showed an association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk (OR 1.27, 95 % CI 1.05–1.52, p = 0.01), Asian populations did not show such an association (p = 0.11). When stratified by quality assessment scores, a significant association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk was observed only in the Caucasian high quality subgroup (OR 1.27 95 % CI 1.01–1.60, p = 0.05). Null genotypes for both GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion polymorphisms also increased gastric cancer risk (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04–1.80, p = 0.03). Our study suggests that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with a significant increase in gastric cancer risk in Caucasians, but not in Asians. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm the association between GSTT1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in relation to various clinicopathological factors in different ethnic groups, especially Caucasians.     

Differential effects of paraoxonase 1 (PON1) polymorphisms on cancer risk: evidence from 25 published studies

Paraoxonase is an HDL-associated enzyme that plays a preventive role against oxidative stress, which is thought to contribute to cancer development. PON1 activity varies widely among individuals, which is in part related to two common nonsynonymous polymorphisms in the PON1 gene (Q192R and L55M). The polymorphisms in PON1 have been implicated in cancer risk. However, results from the studies to date have been conflicting. To clarify the association, a meta-analysis was performed for 7,073 cases and 9,520 controls from 25 published case–control studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Significant associations between PON1-L55M but not Q192R polymorphism and total cancer were observed from all the comparisons. In stratified analyses, PON1-55M allele was a risk factor for breast cancer. Similarly, increased risk was observed for prostate cancer (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01–1.36, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.260) and Caucasian population (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.38, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.1) of the LM genotype, compared with the LL genotype. For PON1-Q192R polymorphism, PON1-192R allele was a decreased risk factor for cancer in the Asian group (RR vs QQ: OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38–0.98, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.268; QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52–0.96, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.130; RR + QR vs QQ: OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53–0.95, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.135). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggests that the PON1-55M allele is a risk factor for the development of cancer, in particular for breast cancer. Future studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to further evaluate these associations.     

Glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms have been implicated in susceptibility to male idiopathic infertility, but study results are still controversial. To investigate the genetic associations between GSTs polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) form studies in electronic databases up to March 16, 2012. Glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) null genotype, Glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) null genotype, and dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 were analyzed independently. 14 eligible studies with a total of 1,845 idiopathic infertility males and 1,729 controls were included. There were 13 studies on GSTM1 polymorphism, 10 ones on GSTT1 polymorphism and 5 ones on GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis. Meta-analyses of total relevant studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI 1.07–1.84, P _OR = 0.015). The GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis showed dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was also significantly associated with increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.85, 95 % CI 1.07–3.21, P _OR = 0.028). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed the associations above were still statistically significant in Caucasians (For GSTM1, OR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.11–2.05, P _OR = 0.009; For GSTM1/GSTT1, OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.51–2.91, P _OR < 0.001). This meta-analysis suggests GSTM1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of male idiopathic infertility in Caucasians, and males with dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 are particularly susceptible to developing idiopathic infertility.     

Potential risk modifications of GSTT1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 (glutathione-S-transferases) variants and their association to CAD in patients with type-2 diabetes

Background

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) resulting in high morbidity and mortality. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1) are known for their broad range of detoxification and in the metabolism of xenobiotics. Recent studies revealed the relationship of GSTs variants with T2DM and CAD. In this case-control study we ascertained the association of GSTs variants in association with the development of CAD in patients with T2DM.

Methods

From the Southern part of India, we enrolled 222 T2DM patients, 290 T2DM patients with CAD and 270 healthy controls matched for age, sex and origin. Serum lipid profiles were measured and DNA was extracted from the blood samples. Multiplex PCR for GSTM1/T1 (null polymorphism) and PCR-RFLP for GSTP1 (105 A > G), were performed for genotyping of study participants. Gene frequency and lipid profiles were statistically analyzed for disease association.

Results

Regression analysis showed that, GSTM1-null genotype is associated with a 2-fold increase (OR = 2.925; 95% CI = 2.078–4.119; P < 0.0001) and GSTT1-null genotype is associated with a 3-fold increase (OR = 3.114; 95% CI = 2.176–4.456; P < 0.0001) to T2DM development. Ile/Val and Val/Val genotypes of GSTP1 also showed a significant risk for T2DM (OR = 1.423, CI = 1.041–1.946; P = 0.027 and OR = 1.829, CI = 1.064–3.142; P = 0.029). Increased odds ratio showed that GSTT1-null genotype had a moderately higher occurrence in T2DM–CAD patients (OR = 1.918, 95% CI = 1.144–3.214; P = 0.014) than T2DM patients without CAD. The level of HDL has significantly decreased in GSTT1-present than in GSTT1-null genotype (43.50 ± 4.10 vs. 45.20 ± 3.90; P = 0.004) when compared with control and T2DM patients. However, LDL level showed a significant increase in GSTT1-null than GSTT1-present genotype (108.70 ± 16.90 vs. 102.20 ± 12.60; P = 0.005). Although the GSTM1-null polymorphism showed no correlation with lipid profiles among T2DM and T2DM with CAD patients, GSTT1-null polymorphism attained a statistical significance for the level of LDL (127 ± 28.20 vs. 134 ± 29.10; P = 0.039) and triglycerides in T2DM with CAD patients (182.10 ± 21.10 vs. 191.20 ± 24.10; P = 0.018).

Conclusion

Our work concludes that GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 variants might contribute to the development of T2DM and GSTT1 variant alone is involved in the development of T2DM associated CAD complications in the South Indian population.     

Association between glutathione S-transferases M1, T1 and P1 gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer in Koreans

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the developed world, and the incidence of this cancer is rising rapidly in many countries. Several polymorphic genes encoding enzymes involved carcinogenesis have been studied as potential risk factor of prostate cancer. Genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases M1 (GSTM1), T1 (GSTT1) and P1 (GSTP1) genes have been constantly reported to have a meaningful effect on prostate cancer risk. But other surveys of this relationship have yielded inconsistent results. To assess the possible contribution of the GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in prostate cancer, we performed a population-based study of 139 prostate cancer patients and 115 healthy controls based on their genotype distributions of the genes. There were no differences in distributions of genotype frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms between prostate cancer patients and controls (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 0.886–2.860 for GSTM1 and OR 1.38, 95 % CI 0.739–2.577 for GSTP1). In contrast, the distribution of GSTT1-null genotype is significantly different between the prostate cancer case and controls (OR 0.26, 95 % CI 0.128–0.518, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, GSTP1 I/V and V/V genotypes were significantly associated with prostate cancer where the PSA level was more than 10.0 (OR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.319–5.639, p = 0.006). Thus, our data imply that the GSTT1-null genotype may not be a risk factor but a protective factor of prostate cancer and GSTP1 Val allele is a risk factor for the prostate cancer where the PSA level was high, although functional studies with larger sample size are necessary to elucidate these findings.