Vitamin D3 restores altered cholinergic and insulin receptor expression in the cerebral cortex and muscarinic M3 receptor expression in pancreatic islets of streptozotocin induced diabetic rats

Nutritional therapy is a challenging but necessary dimension in the management of diabetes and neurodegenerative changes associated with it. The study evaluates the effect of vitamin D₃ in preventing the altered function of cholinergic, insulin receptors and GLUT3 in the cerebral cortex of diabetic rats. Muscarinic M3 acetylcholine receptors in pancreas control insulin secretion. Vitamin D₃ treatment in M3 receptor regulation in the pancreatic islets was also studied. Radioreceptor binding assays and gene expression was done in the cerebral cortex of male Wistar rats. Immunocytochemistry of muscarinic M3 receptor was studied in the pancreatic islets using specific antibodies. Y-maze was used to evaluate the exploratory and spatial memory. Diabetes induced a decrease in muscarinic M1, insulin and vitamin D receptor expression and an increase in muscarinic M3, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, acetylcholine esterase and GLUT3 expression. Vitamin D₃ and insulin treatment reversed diabetes-induced alterations to near control. Diabetic rats showed a decreased Y-maze performance while vitamin D₃ supplementation improved the behavioural deficit. In conclusion, vitamin D₃ shows a potential therapeutic effect in normalizing diabetes-induced alterations in cholinergic, insulin and vitamin D receptor and maintains a normal glucose transport and utilisation in the cortex. In addition vitamin D₃ modulated muscarinic M3 receptors activity in pancreas and plays a pivotal role in controlling insulin secretion. Hence our findings proved, vitamin D₃ supplementation as a potential nutritional therapy in ameliorating diabetes mediated cortical dysfunctions and suggest an interaction between vitamin D₃ and muscarinic M3 receptors in regulating insulin secretion from pancreas.     

AFDX-116 discriminates between muscarinic M2 receptors of the heart and the iris smooth muscle

Summary Studies with the atypical muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine provide convincing evidence for the classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) into two subtypes, M₁ and M₂. The present study examines the heterogeneity of the M₂ subtype employing the newly developed competitive muscarinic antagonist, AFDX-116. Comparison of the binding affinities of pirenzepine, atropine, and AFDX-116 to mAChRs in microsomes from the rabbit cerebral cortex, heart, and iris smooth muscle shows that iris mAChRs, which are pharmacologically of the M₂ subtype, can be distinguished from M₂ cardiac receptors based on their affinity for AFDX-116. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the M₂ receptor subtype consists of a heterogeneous population of receptors.Abbreviations mAChRs Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors - CCh Carbachol - NMS N-Methylscopolamine - AFDX-116 11-[[2-[(diethylamino)methyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6Hpyrido[2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepine-6-one     

Generation and pharmacological analysis of M2 and M4 muscarinic receptor knockout mice

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M1-M5) play important roles in the modulation of many key functions of the central and peripheral nervous system. To explore the physiological roles of the two Gi-coupled muscarinic receptors, we disrupted the M2 and M4 receptor genes in mice by using a gene targeting strategy. Pharmacological and behavioral analysis of the resulting mutant mice showed that the M2 receptor subtype is critically involved in mediating three of the most striking central muscarinic effects, tremor, hypothermia, and analgesia. These studies also indicated that M4 receptors are not critically involved in these central muscarinic responses. However, M4 receptor-deficient mice showed an increase in basal locomotor activity and greatly enhanced locomotor responses following drug-induced activation of D1 dopamine receptors. This observation is consistent with the concept that M4 receptors exert inhibitory control over D1 receptor-mediated locomotor stimulation, probably at the level of striatal projection neurons where the two receptors are known to be coexpressed. These findings emphasize the usefulness of gene targeting approaches to shed light on the physiological and pathophysiological roles of the individual muscarinic receptor subtypes.     

Phosphorylation by Protein Kinase C of the Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors purified from porcine cerebrum were phosphorylated by protein kinase C purified from the same tissue. More than 1 mol of phosphate was incorporated per mole of receptor, with both serine and threonine residues being phosphorylated. Neither the degree nor the rate of the phosphorylation was affected by the presence or absence of acetylcholine. GTP-sensitive high-affinity binding with acetylcholine was observed for muscarinic receptors reconstituted with GTP-binding proteins (Gi or Go), irrespective of whether muscarinic receptors or the GTP-binding proteins had been phosphorylated by protein kinase C or not. This indicates that the interaction between purified muscarinic receptors and purified GTP-binding proteins in vitro is not affected by their phosphorylation.     

Snake toxins with high selectivity for subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

There are five subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M(1) to M(5)) which control a large number of physiological processes, such as the function of heart and smooth muscles, glandular secretion, release of neurotransmitters, gene expression and cognitive functions as learning and memory. A selective ligand is very useful for studying the function of a subtype in presence of other subtypes, which is the most common situation, since a cell or an organ usually has several subtypes. There are many non-selective muscarinic ligands, but only few selective ones. Mambas, African snakes of genus Dendroaspis have toxins, muscarinic toxins, that are selective for M(1), M(2) and M(4) receptors. They consist of 63-66 amino acids and four disulfides which form four loops. They are members of a large group of snake toxins, three-finger toxins; three loops are extended like the middle fingers of a hand and the disulfides and the shortest loop are in the palm of the hand. Some of the toxins target the allosteric site which is located in a cleft of the receptor molecule close to its extracellular part. A possible explanation to the good selectivity is that the toxins bind to the allosteric site, but because of their size they probably also bind to extracellular parts of the receptors which are rather different in the various subtypes. Some other allosteric ligands also have good selectivity, the alkaloid brucine and derivatives are selective for M(1), M(3) and M(4) receptors. Muscarinic toxins have been used in several types of experiments. For instance radioactively labeled M(1) and M(4) selective toxins were used in autoradiography of hippocampus from Alzheimer patients. One significant change in the receptor content was detected in one region of the hippocampus, dentate gyrus, where M(4) receptors were reduced by 50% in patients as compared to age-matched controls. Hippocampus is essential for memory consolidation. M(4) receptors in dentate gyrus may play a role, since they decreased in Alzheimers disease which destroys the memory. Another indication of the role of M(4) receptors for memory is that injection of the M(4) selective antagonist muscarinic toxin 3 (M(4)-toxin 1) into rat hippocampus produced amnesia.     

Molecular and pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptors in retinal pigment epithelium: role in light-adaptive pigment movements

Muscarinic receptors are the predominant cholinergic receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Recently, activation of muscarinic receptors was found to elicit pigment granule dispersion in retinal pigment epithelium isolated from bluegill fish. Pigment granule movement in retinal pigment epithelium is a light-adaptive mechanism in fish. In the present study, we used pharmacological and molecular approaches to identify the muscarinic receptor subtype and the intracellular signaling pathway involved in the pigment granule dispersion in retinal pigment epithelium. Of the muscarinic receptor subtype-specific antagonists used, only antagonists specific for M1 and M3 muscarinic receptors were found to block carbamyl choline (carbachol)-induced pigment granule dispersion. A phospholipase C inhibitor also blocked carbachol-induced pigment granule dispersion, and a similar result was obtained when retinal pigment epithelium was incubated with an inositol trisphosphate receptor inhibitor. We isolated M2 and M5 receptor genes from bluegill and studied their expression. Only M5 was found to be expressed in retinal pigment epithelium. Taken together, pharmacological and molecular evidence suggest that activation of an odd subtype of muscarinic receptor, possibly M5, on fish retinal pigment epithelium induces pigment granule dispersion.     

Structural determinants for the interactions between muscarinic toxin 7 and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) have five subtypes and play crucial roles in various physiological functions and pathophysiological processes. Poor subtype specificity of mAChR modulators has been an obstacle to discover new therapeutic agents. Muscarinic toxin 7 (MT7) is a natural peptide toxin with high selectivity for the M1 receptor. With three to five residues substituted, M3, M4, and M5 receptor mutants could bind to MT7 at nanomolar concentration as the M1 receptor. However, the structural mechanisms explaining MT7–mAChRs binding are still largely unknown. In this study, we constructed 10 complex models of MT7 and each mAChR subtype or its mutant, performed molecular dynamics simulations, and calculated the binding energies to investigate the mechanisms. Our results suggested that the structural determinants for the interactions on mAChRs were composed of some critical residues located separately in the extracellular loops of mAChRs, such as Glu4.56, Leu4.60, Glu/Gln4.63, Tyr4.65, Glu/Asp6.67, and Trp7.35. The subtype specificity of MT7 was attributed to the non‐conserved residues at positions 4.56 and 6.67. These structural mechanisms could facilitate the discovery of novel mAChR modulators with high subtype specificity and enhance the understanding of the interactions between ligands and G‐protein‐coupled receptors. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

昆虫毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体的研究进展

毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体(Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors,mAChRs)是昆虫神经系统中一类重要的G蛋白偶联受体.昆虫mAChRs可以分为A、B、C型三大类,它们通过偶联不同的G蛋白激活不同的第二信使,完成信号转导过程,从而发挥其功能.mAChRs参与调控昆虫多种生理反应和行为过程,如生长发育、运动、鸣声、嗅觉以及学习记忆等,是潜在的杀虫剂靶标,对昆虫mAChRs的全面研究有助于开发新型杀虫剂.本文较为全面地综述了近年来国内外昆虫mAChRs的组织分布、信号转导、药理学特性以及生理功能等方面的研究新进展,为今后研究该类受体提供参考.     

Glycoprotein Properties of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors from Bovine Cerebral Cortex

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors from bovine cerebral cortex were solubilized in digitonin for the subsequent determination of several biochemical properties. The digitonin-solubilized receptors were representative of the entire membrane-bound population of muscarinic receptors with respect to carbohydrate content, isoelectric point, and molecular weight. The glycoprotein nature of the solubilized receptors was demonstrated by their quantitative binding to wheat germ agglutinin-agarose. The presence of a bound antagonist did not decrease the extent of receptor binding to this lectin. Treatment of receptors with neuraminidase to remove N-acetylneuraminic acid residues reduced binding to wheat germ agglutinin-agarose by 40%; further treatment with endoglycosidases D and H, to remove all N-linked carbohydrate, decreased binding by a total of 67%. Removal of N-acetylneuraminic acid residues had no effect on agonist binding properties of the membrane-bound receptors. The carbohydrate-specific enzymes were further used to assess the contribution of carbohydrate to the isoelectric point and molecular weight of the receptor. Muscarinic receptors solubilized in either digitonin or Triton X-100 focused as one major species with a pI of 4.3. Neuraminidase treatment resulted in an increase of 0.17 units in the pI of the receptor. Muscarinic receptors labeled with the covalent muscarinic antagonist propylbenzilylcholine mustard migrated as a single major polypeptide with a molecular weight of 73,000 on sodium dodecyl sulfate-urea-polyacrylamide gels. The exclusion of urea from these gels severely retarded receptor mobility, indicating a strong tendency for aggregation of receptors in SDS. Removal of N-linked carbohydrate by endoglycosidase treatment reduced the molecular weight of the antagonist binding polypeptide by no more than 5%. These results demonstrate the glycoprotein nature of muscarinic receptors from mammalian cerebral cortex and provide evidence for their heterogeneity with respect to carbohydrate content.     

The Cysteine Residue in the Carboxyl-Terminal Domain of the m2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Is Not Required for Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Adenylate Cyclase

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) share with many other receptors of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptor family a highly conserved cysteine residue in the putative cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal region of the protein. Because elimination of this cysteine in the beta 2-adrenergic receptor has been reported to decrease functional responsiveness, we determined if this cysteine residue is essential for mAChR-effector coupling by replacing Cys457 of the m2 mAChR with glycine and expressing wild-type and mutant receptor in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The mutant and wild-type receptors exhibited similar affinities for binding of muscarinic ligands. In addition, the mutation did not affect cell surface localization or receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase. These results indicate that the cysteine residue in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the m2 mAChR is not required for ligand binding or mAChR-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase in CHO cells.     

Influence of MT7 toxin on the oligomerization state of the M1 muscarinic receptor1

Background information. The idea that GPCRs (G‐protein‐coupled receptors) may exist as homo‐ or hetero‐oligomers, although still controversial, is now widely accepted. Nevertheless, the functional roles of oligomerization are still unclear and gaining greater insight into the mechanisms underlying the dynamics of GPCR assembly and, in particular, assessing the effect of ligands on this process seems important. We chose to focus our present study on the effect of MT7 (muscarinic toxin 7), a highly selective allosteric peptide ligand, on the oligomerization state of the hM₁ (human M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype). Results. We analysed the hM₁ oligomerization state in membrane preparations or in live cells and observed the effect of MT7 via four complementary techniques: native‐PAGE electrophoresis analysed by both Western blotting and autoradiography on solubilized membrane preparations of CHO‐M1 cells (Chinese‐hamster ovary cells expressing muscarinic M₁ receptors); FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) experiments on cells expressing differently tagged M₁ receptors using either an acceptor photobleaching approach or a novel fluorescence emission anisotropy technique; and, finally, by BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) assays. Our results reveal that MT7 seems to protect the M₁ receptor from the dissociating effect of the detergent and induces an increase in the FRET and BRET signals, highlighting its ability to affect the dimeric form of the receptor. Conclusions. Our results suggest that MT7 binds to a dimeric form of hM₁ receptor, favouring the stability of this receptor state at the cellular level, probably by inducing some conformational rearrangements of the pre‐existing muscarinic receptor homodimers.     

Subtype-specific regulation of the expression and function of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in embryonic chicken retinal cells

We examined the effect of long-term agonist exposure on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expression and function in embryonic chicken retinal cells. Long-term carbachol exposure induced a time- and concentration-dependent decrease in M2, M3 and M4 muscarinic receptor numbers. Kinetic analyses revealed a first-order process with similar rate constants for all three subtypes. Both the maximal decrease and the agonist potency for regulation of M3 were significantly higher than those for M2 and M4. Upon agonist removal, M2 and M4 numbers returned to control values, but M3 recovery after 24 h was no higher than 40%. Agonist treatment did not alter the levels of receptor mRNAs. Receptor inactivation with a covalent alkylating antagonist demonstrated that the partial M3 protein recovery was not due to a decreased intrinsic basal rate of synthesis, suggesting that it is induced by agonist treatment. Prolonged carbachol exposure induced concomitant decreases in muscarinic-mediated inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation which were completely reversed after agonist removal. Sustained receptor activation also promoted significant decreases in muscarinic receptor-stimulated phosphoinositide turnover, which were only partially reversed after agonist removal. These data demonstrate subtype-specific regulation of the expression and function of muscarinic receptors in the retina.     

MNT inhibits the migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC7721 cells

Muscarinic toxins (MTs) are snake venom peptides found to selectively target specific subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors. In here, we have attached a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) tail to three different toxin molecules and evaluated their receptor-blocking effects in a heterologous expression system. MT7-GPI remained anchored to the cell surface and selectively inhibited M(1) muscarinic receptor signaling expressed in the same cell. To further demonstrate the utility of the GPI tail, we generated MT3- and MTα-like gene sequences and fused these to the signal sequence for GPI attachment. Functional assessment of these membrane-anchored toxins on coexpressed target receptors indicated a prominent antagonistic effect. In ligand binding experiments the GPI-anchored toxins were found to exhibit similar selection profiles among receptor subtypes as the soluble toxins. The results indicate that GPI attachment of MTs and related receptor toxins could be used to assess the role of receptor subtypes in specific organs or even cells in vivo by transgenic approaches.     

Oxotremorine-M potentiates NMDA receptors by muscarinic receptor dependent and independent mechanisms

Muscarinic acetylcholine M1 receptors play an important role in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and cortex. Potentiation of NMDA receptors as a consequence of muscarinic acetylcholine M1 receptor activation is a crucial event mediating the cholinergic modulation of synaptic plasticity, which is a cellular mechanism for learning and memory. In Alzheimer's disease, the cholinergic input to the hippocampus and cortex is severely degenerated, and agonists or positive allosteric modulators of M1 receptors are therefore thought to be of potential use to treat the deficits in cognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease. In this study we developed a simple system in which muscarinic modulation of NMDA receptors can be studied in vitro. Human M1 receptors and NR1/2B NMDA receptors were co-expressed in Xenopus oocytes and various muscarinic agonists were assessed for their modulatory effects on NMDA receptor-mediated responses. As expected, NMDA receptor-mediated responses were potentiated by oxotremorine-M, oxotremorine or xanomeline when the drugs were applied between subsequent NMDA responses, an effect which was fully blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine. However, in oocytes expressing NR1/2B NMDA receptors but not muscarinic M1 receptors, oxotremorine-M co-applied with NMDA also resulted in a potentiation of NMDA currents and this effect was not blocked by atropine, demonstrating that oxotremorine-M is able to directly potentiate NMDA receptors. Oxotremorine, which is a close analogue of oxotremorine-M, and xanomeline, a chemically distinct muscarinic agonist, did not potentiate NMDA receptors by this direct mechanism. Comparing the chemical structures of the three different muscarinic agonists used in this study suggests that the tri-methyl ammonium moiety present in oxotremorine-M is important for the compound's interaction with NMDA receptors.     

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured by radioligand binding techniques

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) play a role in learning, memory and behavior in vertebrate animals. We measured the muscarinic cholinergic receptor levels in extracts from zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain by radioligand binding techniques. Saturation binding experiments with the radioligand [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) were used to determine receptor number and relative affinity for several agonists and antagonists. Affinity at zebrafish brain receptors was relatively high with a K(d) of 40 +/- 5 pM. The number of receptors, represented by Bmax, was 63 +/- 16 fmol/mg protein. Oxotremorine and carbachol, agonists at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, bound with displacement curves indicating multiple binding sites. In addition, oxotremorine bound with a higher affinity than did carbachol. The antagonist potency profile at zebrafish receptors in brain was determined to be atropine>pirenzipine>p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol>otenzepad. The results obtained with zebrafish brain compare favorably to those found in insect, fish and mammalian species. Taken together, the binding results and favorable comparisons to mammalian systems indicate that zebrafish may provide a useful model organism for evaluating the role of cholinergic systems in learning, memory and behavior.     

Alterations in the muscarinic M1 and M3 receptor gene expression in the brain stem during pancreatic regeneration and insulin secretion in weanling rats

Muscarinic M1 and M3 receptor changes in the brain stem during pancreatic regeneration were investigated. Brain stem acetylcholine esterase activity decreased at the time of regeneration. Sympathetic activity also decreased as indicated by the norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (EPI) content of adrenals and also in the plasma. Muscarinic M1 and M3 receptors showed reciprocal changes in the brain stem during regeneration. Muscarinic M1 receptor number decreased at time of regeneration without any change in the affinity. High affinity M3 receptors showed an increase in the number. The affinity did not show any change. The number of low affinity receptors decreased with decreased Kd at 72 hours after partial pancreatectomy. The Kd reversed to control value with a reversal of the number of receptors to near control value. Gene expression studies also showed a similar change in the mRNA level of M1 and M3 receptors. These alterations in the muscarinic receptors regulate sympathetic activity and maintain glucose level during pancreatic regeneration. Central muscarinic M1 and M3 receptor subtypes functional balance is suggested to regulate sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, which in turn control the islet cell proliferation and glucose homeostasis.     

Regulation of signal transduction at M2 muscarinic receptor

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors mediate transmission of an extracellular signal represented by released acetylcholine to neuronal or effector cells. There are five subtypes of closely homologous muscarinic receptors which are coupled by means of heterotrimeric G-proteins to a variety of signaling pathways resulting in a multitude of target cell effects. Endogenous agonist acetylcholine does not discriminate among individual subtypes and due to the close homology of the orthosteric binding site the same holds true for most of exogenous agonists. In addition to the classical binding site muscarinic receptors have one or more allosteric binding sites at extracellular domains. Binding of allosteric modulators induces conformational changes in the receptor that result in subtype-specific changes in orthosteric binding site affinity for both muscarinic agonists and antagonists. This overview summarizes our recent experimental effort in investigating certain aspects of M2 muscarinic receptor functioning concerning i) the molecular determinants that contribute to the binding of allosteric modulators, ii) G-protein coupling specificity and subsequent cellular responses and iii) possible functional assays that exploit the unique properties of allosteric modulators for characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes in intact tissue. A detailed knowledge of allosteric properties of muscarinic receptors is required to permit drug design that will modulate signal transmission strength of specific muscarinic receptor subtypes. Furthermore, allosteric modulation of signal transmission strength is determined by cooperativity rather than concentration of allosteric modulator and thus reduces the danger of overdose.     

Regulation of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Concentration in Cloned Neuroblastoma Cells

Abstract: The concentration of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the neuroblastoma cell line NIE-115 is regulated by receptor activation. Muscarinic agonists cause a time and dose-dependent loss of [³H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites from cultured cells. Muscarinic antagonists have no effect on receptor concentration and block agonist-induced regulation. The maximum decrease in steady state receptor levels is 80% and occurs within 9 h. The altered steady state concentration persists as long as agonist remains present. Upon withdrawal of agonist, the concentration of receptors returns to control levels. This increase requires protein synthesis. Kinetically, the increase in receptors following withdrawal of agonist is slower than the decrease caused by addition of agonist, suggesting that bursts of receptor activation could lower receptor levels. In harmony with this prediction, cycles in which receptors are active for 15 min and then inactive for 15 min cause a 50% decrease in receptor concentration in a 6-h period.