Interferons Accelerate Decay of Replication-Competent Nucleocapsids of Hepatitis B Virus

Alpha interferon (IFN-α) is an approved medication for chronic hepatitis B. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is a key mediator of host antiviral immunity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in vivo. However, the molecular mechanism by which these antiviral cytokines suppress HBV replication remains elusive. Using an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML12)-derived cell line supporting tetracycline-inducible HBV replication, we show in this report that both IFN-α and IFN-γ efficiently reduce the amount of intracellular HBV nucleocapsids. Furthermore, we provide evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings thus reveal a novel antiviral mechanism of IFNs and provide a basis for a better understanding of HBV pathobiology.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a noncytopathic hepatotropic DNA virus which belongs to the family Hepadnaviridae (11, 44). Despite the fact that most adulthood HBV infections are transient, approximately 5 to 10% of infected adults and more than 90% of infected neonates fail to clear the virus and develop a lifelong persistent infection, which may progress to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (4, 33, 34). It has been shown by several research groups that resolution of HBV and other animal hepadnavirus infection in vivo depends on both killing of infected hepatocytes by viral antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and noncytolytic suppression of viral replication, which is most likely mediated by inflammatory cytokines, such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (10, 12, 15, 20, 26, 27, 48). Moreover, together with five nucleoside or nucleotide analogs that inhibit HBV DNA polymerase, alpha IFN (IFN-α) and pegylated IFN-α are currently available antiviral medications for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Compared to the viral DNA polymerase inhibitors, the advantages of IFN-α therapy include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and an increased likelihood for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance (8, 39). However, only approximately 30% of treated patients achieve a sustained virological response to a standard 48-month pegylated IFN-α therapy (6, 32). Thus far, the antiviral mechanism of IFN-α and IFN-γ and the parameters determining the success or failure of IFN-α therapy in chronic hepatitis B remain elusive. Elucidation of the mechanism by which the cytokines suppress HBV replication represents an important step toward understanding the pathobiology of HBV infection and the molecular basis of IFN-α therapy of chronic hepatitis B.Considering the mechanism by which IFNs noncytolytically control HBV infection in vivo, it is possible that the cytokines either induce an antiviral response in hepatocytes to directly limit HBV replication or modulate the host antiviral immune response to indirectly inhibit the virus infection. However, due to the fact that IFN-α and -γ do not inhibit or only modestly inhibit HBV replication in human hepatoma-derived cell lines (5, 22, 23, 30), the direct antiviral effects of the cytokines and their antiviral mechanism against HBV have been studied with either an immortalized hepatocyte cell line derived from HBV transgenic mice or duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infection of primary duck hepatocytes (37, 53). While these studies revealed that IFN treatment significantly reduced the amount of encapsidated viral pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) in both mouse and duck hepatocytes, further mechanistic analyses suggested that IFN-α inhibited the formation of pgRNA-containing nucleocapsids in murine hepatocytes (52) but shortened the half-life of encapsidated pgRNA in DHBV-replicating chicken hepatoma cells (21). Moreover, the fate of viral DNA replication intermediates or nucleocapsids in the IFN-treated hepatocytes was not investigated in the previous studies.To further define the target(s) of IFN-α and -γ in the HBV life cycle and to create a robust cell culture system for the identification of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) that mediate the antiviral response of the cytokines (25), we established an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML-12)-derived stable cell line that supported a high level of HBV replication in a tetracycline-inducible manner. Consistent with previous reports, we show that both IFN-α and IFN-γ potently inhibited HBV replication in murine hepatocytes (37, 40). With the help of small molecules that inhibit HBV capsid assembly (Bay-4109) (7, 47) and prevent the incorporation of pgRNA into nucleocapsids (AT-61) (9, 29), we obtained evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings provide a basis for further studies toward better understanding of IFN′s antiviral mechanism, which might ultimately lead to the development of strategies to improve the efficacy of IFN therapy of chronic hepatitis B.     

Gamma Interferon Signaling in Macrophage Lineage Cells Regulates Central Nervous System Inflammation and Chemokine Production

Intracranial (i.c.) infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) results in anorexic weight loss, mediated by T cells and gamma interferon (IFN-γ). Here, we assessed the role of CD4⁺ T cells and IFN-γ on immune cell recruitment and proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine production in the central nervous system (CNS) after i.c. LCMV infection. We found that T-cell-depleted mice had decreased recruitment of hematopoietic cells to the CNS and diminished levels of IFN-γ, CCL2 (MCP-1), CCL3 (MIP-1α), and CCL5 (RANTES) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Mice deficient in IFN-γ had decreased CSF levels of CCL3, CCL5, and CXCL10 (IP-10), and decreased activation of both resident CNS and infiltrating antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The effects of IFN-γ signaling on macrophage lineage cells was assessed using transgenic mice, called “macrophages insensitive to interferon gamma” (MIIG) mice, that express a dominant-negative IFN-γ receptor under the control of the CD68 promoter. MIIG mice had decreased levels of CCL2, CCL3, CCL5, and CXCL10 compared to controls despite having normal numbers of LCMV-specific CD4⁺ T cells in the CNS. MIIG mice also had decreased recruitment of infiltrating macrophages and decreased activation of both resident CNS and infiltrating APCs. Finally, MIIG mice were significantly protected from LCMV-induced anorexia and weight loss. Thus, these data suggest that CD4⁺ T-cell production of IFN-γ promotes signaling in macrophage lineage cells, which control (i) the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, (ii) the recruitment of macrophages to the CNS, (iii) the activation of resident CNS and infiltrating APC populations, and (iv) anorexic weight loss.Immune cell recruitment to and infiltration of the central nervous system (CNS) is central to the pathology of a variety of inflammatory neurological diseases, including infectious meningoencephalitis, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral ischemia (59, 60). Chemokines have been shown to be highly upregulated in both human diseases and animal models of neuroinflammation and are thought to be important mediators of immune cell entry into the CNS (59, 60). For example, during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and multiple sclerosis (MS), the chemokines CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 [MCP-1α]), CCL3 (macrophage inflammatory protein 1α [MIP-1α]), CCL5 (regulated upon activation, T-cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]), and CXCL10 (gamma interferon [IFN-γ]-inducible protein 10 [IP-10]) are produced by either resident CNS cells or infiltrating cells (27) and serve to amplify the ongoing inflammatory response (25, 28). However, in some EAE studies, neither CCL3 nor CXCL10 were required for disease (72, 73). During CNS viral infection, CXCL10 and CCL5 are highly produced in several models (2, 41, 48, 82). In addition, mice deficient in CCR5, which binds (among others) CCL3 and CCL5, do not display impaired CNS inflammation after certain viral infections (13). Thus, the role of chemokines in CNS inflammation is likely complex and dissimilar between autoimmune and viral infection models.IFN-γ is present in the CNS during autoimmunity and infection (7, 54, 69). Several studies suggest that IFN-γ can be a potent inducer of CNS chemokine expression. Adenoviral expression of IFN-γ in the CNS strongly induced CCL5 and CXCL10 mRNA and protein, and this induction was dependent on the presence of the IFN-γ receptor (50). In EAE and Toxoplasma infection, mice deficient in IFN-γ or the IFN-γ receptor demonstrated reduced expression of several chemokines, including CCL2, CCL3, CCL5, and CXCL10 (26, 69). However, given the near-ubiquitous expression of the IFN-γ receptor (44), the mechanisms by which IFN-γ regulates CNS chemokine production remain to be elucidated.We studied neuroinflammation and immune-mediated disease using a well-studied mouse model of infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Intracranial (i.c.) injection of mice with LCMV results in seizures and death 6 to 8 days after inoculation. The onset of symptoms is associated with a massive influx of mononuclear cells into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), meninges, choroid plexus, and ependymal membranes (6, 8, 18), as well as the presence of proinflammatory cytokines (7, 38). The immune response is critical for disease, since infection of irradiated or T-cell-depleted mice leads to persistent infection with very high levels of virus in multiple tissues without the development of lethal meningitis (18, 34, 64). i.c. LCMV infection of β₂-microglobulin-deficient mice (β₂m^−/− mice) also results in meningitis and production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines; however, meningitis occurs with a later onset and lower severity compared to wild-type mice (17, 24, 53, 57). Interestingly, i.c. LCMV infection of these mice also causes severe anorexia and weight loss (33, 38, 46, 52, 57) that is mediated by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-restricted, CD4⁺ T cells (17, 46, 53, 57). Anorexia and weight loss are also observed in wild-type mice, but they succumb to lethal meningitis shortly thereafter (33), making study of this particular aspect of disease difficult. LCMV-induced weight loss, similar to what we have observed in β₂m^−/− mice also occurs in perforin-deficient mice, which possess CD8⁺ T cells (37). Although some reports have observed weight loss after peripheral LCMV infection (11, 45), we note that these studies used high doses of the clone 13 strain of LCMV, in contrast to our studies which have used the Armstrong strain of LCMV and orders of magnitude less virus (33, 38, 46, 52, 57). Although we cannot exclude a contribution of peripheral cells to weight loss in our i.c. Armstrong infection model, we previously showed that this weight loss does not occur with peripheral infection with LCMV Armstrong (33, 38), indicating that interactions between the CNS and the immune system are contribute substantially to disease.During LCMV infection, there is biphasic production of IFN-γ: a small, early peak of IFN-γ (most likely produced by NK or NKT cells), followed by T-cell-mediated production of IFN-γ (23, 75). Further, both CD4⁺ T cells and CD8⁺ T cells produce large amounts of IFN-γ after LCMV infection and T-cell production of IFN-γ is critical for LCMV-induced weight loss (35). Chemokines, especially CXCL10, CCL5, and CCL2, and their receptors, are upregulated in the brain after i.c. LCMV infection (2, 13). Brain chemokine mRNA expression after i.c. LCMV infection is reduced in IFN-γ-deficient mice and relatively absent in athymic mice (2). However, the mechanism(s) by which T cells and IFN-γ mediate the effects on CNS chemokine expression, cellular infiltration into the CNS, and LCMV-induced anorexic weight loss remain unclear.In the present study, we focused on two major questions. The first question concerned the role of IFN-γ on immune cell recruitment to and chemokine/cytokine production within the CNS? We found that macrophages and myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) require IFN-γ for their accumulation within the CNS. Second, since macrophages and myeloid DCs are the predominant cellular infiltrate, we sought to determine whether IFN-γ signaling on these cells was direct with regard to their recruitment and to chemokine/cytokine production. We found that IFN-γ signaling in macrophage lineage cells contributes significantly to their recruitment, to chemokine production in the CNS, and to anorexic weight loss. Together, these data suggest that much of the proinflammatory effects of IFN-γ in the CNS are mediated by the effects of IFN-γ on CD68-bearing cells.     

Inability of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells To Directly Lyse HIV-Infected Autologous CD4+ T Cells despite Induction of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand

The function of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) in chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection remains controversial with regard to its potential for sustained alpha interferon (IFN-α) production and induction of PDC-dependent tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-mediated cytotoxicity of HIV-infected cells. We address these areas by a study of chronically HIV-1-infected subjects followed through antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruption and by testing PDC cytolytic function against autologous HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells. Rebound in viremia induced by therapy interruption showed a positive association between TRAIL and viral load or T-cell activation, but comparable levels of plasma IFN-α/β were found in viremic ART-treated and control subjects. While PDC from HIV-infected subjects expressed less interferon regulator factor 7 (IRF-7) and produced significantly less IFN-α upon Toll-like receptor 7/9 (TLR7/9) engagement than controls, membrane TRAIL expression in PDC from HIV⁺ subjects was increased. Moreover, no significant increase in death receptor 5 (DR5) expression was seen in CD4⁺ T cells from viremic HIV⁺ subjects compared to controls or following in vitro infection/exposure to infectious and noninfectious virus or exogenous IFN-α, respectively. Although activated PDC killed the DR5-expressing HIV-infected Sup-T1 cell line, PDC did not lyse primary autologous HIV⁺ CD4⁺ T cells yet could provide accessory help for NK cells in killing HIV-infected autologous CD4⁺ T cells. Taken together, our data show a lack of sustained high levels of soluble IFN-α in chronic HIV-1 infection in vivo and document a lack of direct PDC cytolytic activity against autologous infected or uninfected CD4⁺ T cells.Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with chronic immune activation, progressive immune suppression, and deletion of memory adaptive responses, resulting in increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections (23, 51, 52). Loss of CD4⁺ T cells is the hallmark of HIV infection, with multiple mechanisms proposed as contributing to this loss (activation-induced cell death, direct cytopathic effect, immune cells, and death receptor-mediated apoptosis induction) (reviewed in references 33 and 34). One of the most puzzling observations in AIDS pathogenesis has been the progressive depletion of bystander T cells, especially in lymphoid tissues (25, 33, 34, 55). While antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiated in the early stages of HIV infection, when CD4⁺ T-cell counts are high (>500 cells/μl), may prevent the destruction of lymph node (LN) tissue and the massive depletion of CD4⁺ T lymphocytes by decreasing the rate of virally induced apoptosis (20), a persistent, albeit decreased, level of apoptosis of peripheral blood CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells is seen in ART-treated HIV⁺ subjects despite long-term viral suppression (36).A member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), has been shown to be involved in HIV-1-associated T-cell apoptosis (33, 34). TRAIL (soluble or membrane bound) induces apoptosis upon binding to death receptor 4 (DR4; also named TRAIL-R1) or DR5 (also named TRAIL-R2, TRICK2, or Killer/DR5).On the basis of the in vitro observation that alpha interferon (IFN-α) and interferon regulator factor 7 (IRF-7) are increased in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) exposed to HIV-1 (40), the hypothesis that PDC activation by HIV-1 is responsible for an increased level of IFN-α throughout chronic disease has been proposed. It has also been proposed that the activation of the PDC compartment by HIV-1 participates in the initial immune activation following acute infection and contributes to CD4⁺ T-cell depletion by inducing, through IFN-α, the production of TRAIL, which mediates apoptosis of DR5-expressing CD4⁺ T cells following HIV-1 infection (37, 38, 40). However, several lines of evidence question the direct involvement of PDC in the loss of T cells during HIV infection, as PDC numbers are depleted during chronic HIV infection and PDC remaining in circulation are functionally impaired (10). Recent data show that circulating PDC in HIV-infected subjects, although unable to secrete IFN-α after Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated activation, constitutively express an increased level of IFN-α mRNA, indicating that during HIV infection PDC are activated yet impaired (71). Rodriguez et al. demonstrated the prevention of spontaneous apoptosis of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells by IFN-α (63), a major product of PDC following HIV-1 stimulation (3, 28). In addition, Audige et al. (2) showed that blockade of IFN-α and IFN-α receptor during in vitro HIV infection of CD4⁺ T cells isolated from human tonsils did not prevent apoptosis or TRAIL production, suggesting a lack of a central link between IFN-α production and apoptosis of tonsillar CD4⁺ T cells in HIV-1 infection. These data are also consistent with the observation that, in the human peripheral blood lymphocyte-transplanted SCID mouse (hu-PBL-SCID) model, IFN-α efficiently increases the survival of CD4⁺ T cells (49). Thus, controversy remains on the role of IFN-α as an indirect or direct inducer of apoptosis of CD4⁺ T cells through PDC/TRAIL induction, whereas the possibility that IFN-α acts as an antiviral agent by controlling HIV-1 replication and thus reducing virally mediated T-cell loss appears to be supported by several studies (reviewed in references 26, 47, and 58). In this regard, endogenous IFN-α produced by PDC has been shown to play an important role in controlling HIV infection in the human thymus (35), upregulating host antiviral factors such as APOBEC (1, 32, 44, 70) and stimulating NK cell-mediated cytotoxic activity against autologous HIV-infected targets (72).In this report, we investigated the in vivo correlates of viremia in chronically infected subjects by studying the relationship between therapy interruption-associated viremia and plasma IFN-α and TRAIL levels. We also tested in vitro the functional outcome of HIV-1-activated PDC in terms of their ability to mediate lysis of primary autologous CD4 T cells (infected or not with HIV-1), compared to indirect PDC-mediated lysis effects on the NK-dependent antiviral cytotoxic response.     

Lambda Interferon Renders Epithelial Cells of the Respiratory and Gastrointestinal Tracts Resistant to Viral Infections

Virus-infected cells secrete a broad range of interferons (IFN) which confer resistance to yet uninfected cells by triggering the synthesis of antiviral factors. The relative contributions of the various IFN subtypes to innate immunity against virus infections remain elusive. IFN-α, IFN-β, and other type I IFN molecules signal through a common, universally expressed cell surface receptor, whereas type III IFN (IFN-λ) uses a distinct cell-type-specific receptor complex for signaling. Using mice lacking functional receptors for type I IFN, type III IFN, or both, we found that IFN-λ plays an important role in the defense against several human pathogens that infect the respiratory tract, such as influenza A virus, influenza B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus. These viruses were more pathogenic and replicated to higher titers in the lungs of mice lacking both IFN receptors than in mice with single IFN receptor defects. In contrast, Lassa fever virus, which infects via the respiratory tract but primarily replicates in the liver, was not influenced by the IFN-λ receptor defect. Careful analysis revealed that expression of functional IFN-λ receptor complexes in the lung and intestinal tract is restricted to epithelial cells and a few other, undefined cell types. Interestingly, we found that SARS coronavirus was present in feces from infected mice lacking receptors for both type I and type III IFN but not in those from mice lacking single receptors, supporting the view that IFN-λ contributes to the control of viral infections in epithelial cells of both respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts.The interferon (IFN) system represents a major element of the innate immune response against viral infections (10, 13, 14). Virus-induced IFN is a complex mixture of biologically active molecules, which includes type I and type III IFN. Type I IFN consists of 14 different IFN-α subtypes in the mouse as well as IFN-β, IFN-κ, IFN-ɛ, and limitin, which all signal through the same universally expressed cell surface receptor complex (IFNAR) (30). Type III IFN includes IFN-λ1, IFN-λ2, and IFN-λ3 (21, 28), of which only the latter two are encoded by genes that are expressed in the mouse (22). Type III IFN uses a distinct receptor complex (IL28R) for signaling (21, 28), which appears to be expressed on only a few cell types, including epithelial cells (29). Binding of type I IFN and type III IFN to their cognate receptor complexes triggers signaling cascades that result in the activation of a large number of genes, many of which encode antiviral proteins (10, 32). Type I IFN and type III IFN trigger highly similar gene expression profiles in responsive cells, suggesting that both IFN types might serve similar functions. However, it has to date been largely unclear to which extent IFN-λ might contribute to innate immunity.Using knockout mouse strains that lack receptors for type I IFN (IFNAR1^0/0), type III IFN (IL28Rα^0/0), or both (IFNAR1^0/0IL28Rα^0/0), we have recently shown that IFN-λ contributes to resistance against influenza A virus (FLUAV) (26). Here, we used the same mouse strains to investigate the relative contribution of IFN-λ in resistance against additional viral pathogens that infect the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract and to visualize IFN-λ-responsive cells. We found that the double-knockout mice showed enhanced susceptibility to various viruses that primarily replicate in lung epithelial cells. Our analysis further revealed that epithelial cells of both lung and gastrointestinal tracts can strongly respond to IFN-λ and that IFN-λ inhibited the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in both lung and gastrointestinal tracts.     

Receptor Density Is Key to the Alpha2/Beta Interferon Differential Activities

Multiple type I interferons (IFN-α/β) elicit Jak/Stat activation, rapid gene induction, and pleiotropic effects, such as differentiation, antiviral protection, and blocks in proliferation, which are dependent on the IFN subtype and the cellular context. To date, ligand- and receptor-specific molecular determinants underlying IFN-α/β differential activities or potencies have been well characterized. To analyze cellular determinants that impact subtype-specific potency, human fibrosarcoma U5A-derived clones, exhibiting a gradient of IFN sensitivity by virtue of increasing receptor levels, were monitored for Jak/Stat signaling, gene induction, cell cycle lengthening, and apoptosis. In cells with scarce receptors, IFN-β was more potent than IFN-α2 in antiproliferative activity, while the two subtypes were equipotent in all other readouts. Conversely, in cells with abundant receptors, IFN-α2 matched or even surpassed IFN-β in all readouts tested. Our results suggest that the differential activities of the IFN subtypes are dictated not only by the intrinsic ligand/receptor binding kinetics but also by the density of cell surface receptor components.A persistent question in the field of helically bundled cytokines concerns the molecular basis of intracellular signal activation following binding to cognate cell surface receptors. Typically, cytokine-induced dimerization of the receptor subunits is thought to trigger catalytic transactivation of the associated Jak tyrosine kinases. Phosphorylation of critical receptor tyrosine motifs by the activated Jak proteins allows recruitment and activation of downstream Stat effectors (25, 34). A clear distinction can be made between the short homodimeric Jak2-activating receptors, such as the growth hormone or the erythropoietin receptors, and the more complex heteromeric receptors. Among these latter is the type I interferon (IFN) receptor, a prototypic class 2 receptor, made of two subunits, each associated with a different Jak enzyme (29). IFNAR2 contains extracellularly two fibronectin III domains forming a well-defined cytokine binding module. The cytoplasmic region of IFNAR2 is 250 amino acids long, interacts with Jak1, and contains two principal Tyr-based Stat recruitment motifs (24, 35). IFNAR1 is made of a large ectodomain of four fibronectin III domains, not all involved in ligand binding, and a 100-amino-acid-long cytoplasmic region complexed with Tyk2 and subjected to ligand-induced ubiquitination driving receptor proteolysis (13, 14).A large array of IFNs (over a dozen α subtypes and one β subtype) bind to this ubiquitously expressed receptor complex to induce rapid gene expression programs that elicit measurable antiviral responses and cell growth inhibition as well as cell context-specific functional changes (4, 31). Several studies have reported on differential activities of type I IFNs, but no unique function has ever been attributed to a given subtype (see references in reference 29). Thus, a differential can be defined as a lack of correlation between two specific activities. For instance, depending on the cell system, IFN-α2 and IFN-β can exhibit equivalent antiproliferative potency or over a 100-fold difference in antiproliferative potency and nearly equipotency in antiviral activity. Since no overt differences are observed in the structure or stoichiometry of the ligand-receptor complex formed with different subtypes, the concordant view points to the way each IFN subtype engages the available receptors. Indeed, kinetic measurements of the interaction of IFN-α2 and IFN-β with receptor ectodomains have shown substantial differences. IFNAR2 represents the high-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits nanomolar binding affinity and IFN-β exhibits ∼100 pM binding affinity. Conversely, IFNAR1 is the low-affinity subunit, toward which IFN-α2 exhibits micromolar affinity and IFN-β ∼50 nM affinity (19, 22). The contribution of the individual and combined affinities on ternary complex formation by either IFN subtype have been thoroughly studied (10, 26). However, how these dynamic parameters influence receptor function and translate into activation of Jak, recruitment of Stats and additional effectors, gene induction, and bioactivities remains ill defined.Rather than focusing on ligand and receptor determinants, here we investigated the relationship between receptor subunit levels and IFN-α2 versus IFN-β signaling and functional outcomes (IFN-α2/β differential potencies). Since we previously showed that no simple relationship between receptor levels and Jak/Stat signaling can be inferred by comparing different cell types (18), we have used a reductionist approach in a single cell type, from which we have engineered and studied clones expressing low or abundant receptor levels. We show that the density of receptors at the cell surface represents a critical determinant of the level of differential activity exhibited by two IFN subtypes.